My Fujifilm X-T30 Kodachrome 64 Film Simulation Recipe


Kodachrome Slides – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – “Kodachrome 64”

Kodachrome 64 is probably the most requested film that people have asked me to create a recipe for. Kodachrome has a long history, with the first successful version debuting in 1935 (film simulation recipe here). In the early 1960’s Kodak replaced that version of the film with Kodachrome II and Kodachrome X (film simulation recipe here). In 1974 Kodak made the final version of Kodachrome, available in ISO 25 and ISO 64 (and later ISO 200) versions. This Kodachrome was discontinued 10 years ago. Kodak also discontinued the chemicals to process Kodachrome, and nine years ago the last roll was developed. This film simulation recipe is meant to mimic the aesthetics of Kodachrome 64.

In the early 1970’s there was a movement to end Kodachrome. The process to develop the film was toxic and complex. Kodachrome is actually a black-and-white film with color added during development, which you can imagine isn’t a simple procedure. Instead of discontinuing their most popular color film, Kodak made a new version that required a less-toxic (but still toxic) and less complicated (but still complicated) development process. This appeased those who wanted the film gone, but the new version of Kodachrome was not initially well received by photographers, many of whom liked the old version better. William Eggleston, for example, who used Kodachrome extensively in his early career, wasn’t a fan of the new version, and began to use other films instead.

The photography community did come around to Kodachrome 25 and Kodachrome 64. Due to Kodachrome’s sharpness, grain, color, contrast and archival characteristics, this film was a great all-around option that worked well in almost any circumstance. The film became incredibly popular, and was found on the pages of many magazines, including National Geographic, which practically made its use a requirement. Steve McCurry was perhaps the best known photographer to extensively use this era of Kodachrome. He said of the film, “It has almost a poetic look with beautiful colors that were vibrant and true to what you were shooting.”


Onaqui Wild Horses – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – “Kodachrome 64”

I shot many rolls of Kodachrome 64, and a few rolls of Kodachrome 25. My favorite was Kodachrome 64 because it had a little more contrast and was slightly more saturated. It was a sad day for me when Kodak discontinued it. I was just getting into digital photography at that time, and in retrospect I wish that I had paused on digital and shot a few more rolls of Kodachrome. Kodak has hinted that they might resurrect it, but I would be surprised if they actually did because of the complex development process.

When I decided to attempt a Kodachrome 64 film simulation recipe for my Fujifilm X-T30, I did some experiments, and after a few tries I thought that I had it figured out. Excitingly, I snapped many frames with these settings, but then I figured that I should consult some actual Kodachrome 64 slides to make sure that it matched. It didn’t. Kodachrome 64 looked different than how I remembered it. I was close, but not close enough, so I went back to the drawing board. A handful of experiments later I got it right, which is the recipe that you see here.

Of course, the issue with all of these film simulation recipes that mimic actual film is that one film can have many different looks, depending on how it was shot, under what conditions, how it was developed, and how it’s viewed, whether through a projector or light table, a print (and how it was printed), or a scan (and how it was scanned and perhaps digitally altered, and the monitor). There are a ton of variables! Kodachrome looks best when viewed by projector, no doubt about it, but that’s not how Kodachrome is seen today, unless you own a projector and have some slides. While I don’t think that this recipe will ever match the magic of projected Kodachrome, I do think it’s a close approximation of the film and it deserves to share the famed name.


Mayhem – Tooele, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – “Kodachrome 64”

I have Grain set to Weak, but I feel that when using this recipe at higher ISOs Grain should be set to Off. While I chose DR400, in low-contrast situations DR200 is a good Dynamic Range option. For X-Trans III cameras, which obviously don’t have Color Chrome Effect, this recipe will still work and will appear nearly identical, but it will produce a slightly different look. To modify this recipe for Kodachrome 25, I suggest setting Shadow to +1, Color to -1, Grain to Off, and Sharpness to +3.

Classic Chrome
Dynamic Range: DR400
Highlight: +1
Shadow: +2
Color: 0
Noise Reduction: -4
Sharpening: +2
Grain Effect: Weak
Color Chrome Effect: Weak
White Balance: Daylight, +2 Red & -5 Blue
ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400
Exposure Compensation: +1/3 to +1 (typically)

Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this Kodachrome 64 film simulation recipe on my Fujifilm X-T30:


Shopping Cart Car – Riverdale, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Traffic Lamp – Bountiful, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Red Tricycle – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Hay Stack – Layton, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Pony Express Trail – Faust, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Wild Horse Country – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Wild Horse Grazing – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Lonely Horse – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Wild & Free – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Onaqui Horses – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Spotted Green – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Grassland – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


In The Dust – Faust, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Roar Forever – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Jon In The Backyard – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Big Wheel – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Evening Tree – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Look Up To The Sky – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Lavender Bee – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Lavender Sunset – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Sunset Leaves – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Sun Kissed Leaf – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Summer Tree Leaves – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Jar of Coffee Beans – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Beans To Grind – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Sugar Dish – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Morning Coffee – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30


Processed by Kodak – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30

See also: Kodachrome 64 for X-Trans II

Fujifilm X100F Review Blog

Help Fuji X Weekly

Nobody pays me to write the content found on There's a real cost to operating and maintaining this site, not to mention all the time that I pour into it. If you appreciated this article, please consider making a one-time gift contribution. Thank you!



  1. · August 2

    You are my hero! Am running out to shoot with this over the weekend. Thanks!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Fugeelala · August 2

    Good sir, you are amazing! Your recipes have inspired me to shoot more. Looking forward to more great content.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. fragglerocking · August 2

    I’ll have a go with this one too!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Ricardo Richon Guzman · August 2


    so this is meant for daylight only (fixed WB with reddish greenish) ????

    I found that all Kodachrome work “less than spectacular” in low light (not bad , but not as good as in daylight)

    maybe is it the way the contrast work when low light , and this is that you recommend even +1 exposure compensation ?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · August 2

      Well, Kodachrome film was in fact daylight balanced. Back in the film days, you would use warming and cooling filters to adjust the “white balance” for the scene you were shooting. AWB makes those filters unnecessary, which is why I like to use AWB in my recipes. In the case of this Kodachrome 64 recipe, I found that selecting Daylight instead of AWB produced a more accurate look, but AWB would still work if you preferred that.
      As far as night photography, I actually have some night (long exposure) Kodachrome slides, and the blacks were definitely deep black. If you don’t like how the recipe works after dark, I would suggest playing with Shadow and Highlight and see if it doesn’t work better for you with an adjustment. I hope this helps!


  5. ilyastruzhkov walkincircless · August 3

    THANK YOU!!! ❤


  6. Pingback: Kodachrome Compared | Fuji X Weekly
  7. Vito · August 5

    Hi! Which settings do you suggest for a Fuji xt20?
    Thanks and greetings from Italy

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · August 5

      The same exact settings, except obviously you ignore Color Chrome Effect because the X-T20 doesn’t have it.


  8. Pingback: Film Simulation Challenge – 1st Roll: Kodachrome 64 | Fuji X Weekly
  9. Dean Fuller · September 9

    Thanks for producing these recipes. So these can be programmed into custom settings under the Q button, except for some of the modified white balances called for, or is there a way to do that also?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Ritchie Roesch · September 9

      You are welcome! You are correct, everything can be programmed into the Q menu except for the white balance shift, which will have to be adjusted manually.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Rain · October 26

        First I wanted to thank you for your recipes, they’re so inspirational and such a precious help !

        About WB Shifts, I discovered today, switching between two recipes I stored in the quick menu of my X-T3, that white balance shifts are actually stored for each type of white balance. For example in your Kodachrome 64, White Balance is set to Daylight with a shift of +2 Red & -5 Blue, if you switch to another stored recipe with a 3200K White Balance (Fujicolor 100 Industrial) and a shift of +8 Red & -8 Blue, that shift is automatically applied.

        So for each type of White Balance preset you can store one (and only one) shift. As AWB is usually the most commonly used setting, this feature doesn’t seem to be a big help, but now I’m probably going to take advantage of this as I organize my Q menu recipes before shooting sessions.


      • Ritchie Roesch · October 26

        You are welcome, and I much appreciate the feedback!
        Yes, I figured this out a few months back, but (like you said) most recipes use AWB. But that’s also partially why I have tried creating recipes with other white balance settings, with one benefit that it makes things easier when switching between them. Thanks for the comment!


  10. Pingback: 15 Film Simulation Recipes So Far This Year | Fuji X Weekly
  11. Khürt Williams · September 28

    Hi Ritchie, given that most of the Fuji X cameras have a base ISO of ISO 200, would you be willing to make Kodachrome 200 recipe?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · September 28

      I used Kodachrome 200 once. I remember not being impressed because it was so much more grainy than Kodachrome 64. It has a similar look, probably a bit more contrast, smaller dynamic range, and perhaps slightly warmer, but the strong grain wasn’t pretty. At least that’s what I thought at the time, my opinion might be different now. I would think that ISO 12800 might be a good starting point.


  12. mohammed samsheer · October 17

    I tried using the with my Xe-1 but its just not the same. 😦

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · October 17

      Unfortunately, this isn’t compatible with X-Trans I and II, and not completely compatible with X-Trans III. But feel free to play around with the settings on your camera to see how close you can get.


  13. Pingback: DR400 Film Simulation Recipes | Fuji X Weekly
  14. Nick Dyson · October 20

    Love this! Is there a way to apply this recipe to a RAF file in post processing? Would I need to download Fuji X Raw Studio?

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Pingback: รีวิวตั้งค่ากล้อง Fuji X-T30 เป็นโทนฟิล์มอุ่น | magnum x
  16. Pingback: Film Simulation Recipes That Use Other White Balnces | Fuji X Weekly
  17. Pingback: My White Balance Shift Solution | Fuji X Weekly
  18. Pingback: Travel: McCormick Stillman Railroad Park, Scottsdale, AZ | Fuji X Weekly
  19. James Symmonds · December 5

    Not sure if you’ll see this but I have really good news! The Xpro 3 does indeed allow you to save separate white balance shifts per custom setting!


    • Ritchie Roesch · December 5

      That’s awesome news! Thank you for the confirmation!


      • James Symmonds · December 6

        No problem. Now I just need to figure out this Chrome Color Effect Blue thing.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Ritchie Roesch · December 6

        I have no idea, but if you do figure it out be sure to let me know!


  20. Pingback: Fujifilm Grain Settings | Fuji X Weekly
  21. Pingback: Photoessay: November Arizona, Part 1: Color | Fuji X Weekly
  22. gunther geeraerts · December 8

    The fact that white balance can be saved in the XPRO is indeed great news.
    Any recipes possible with the new classic negative sim?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · December 8

      I’m sure that there are a bunch of recipes possible. I can’t wait to try it someday and make some recipes with it.


  23. Pingback: 10 Most Popular Film Simulation Recipes of 2019 | Fuji X Weekly
  24. Pingback: My Fujifilm X-T1 (X-Trans II) Kodachrome 64 Film Simulation Recipe | Fuji X Weekly
  25. Pingback: Monument Valley – A Monumental Landscape | Fuji X Weekly
  26. Pingback: My Fujifilm X-T30 Classic Slide Film Simulation Recipe | Fuji X Weekly
  27. hpchavaz · April 5

    Hi Ritchie,

    I hope everything’s fine on your side as far as health is concerned.

    In the simulation, the DR400 setting is used.

    Is it simply for its effect on the dynamic range or is it also to bring a little bit of grain?

    I ask this question because some people point out that ISO800 brings a little bit of noise compared to ISO200 and that this could be a reason for the DR400 setting.

    More generally, have you noticed an increase in noise for DR400?



    • Ritchie Roesch · April 6

      The DR settings have to do with preventing clipped highlights and maximizing dynamic range. I don’t find a significant difference in digital noise between ISO 200 and ISO 800. In the “old” days, the difference between these two ISOs was huge. Nowadays, you can’t even notice without very closely studying massive crops. Take care!


  28. Pingback: Video: Monument Valley with Fuji X Weekly (500th Post!) | Fuji X Weekly
  29. Pingback: Fuji X Weekly’s Kodachrome Recipes on YouTube | Fuji X Weekly
  30. Serena · May 21

    Hi Ritchie! First of all, thanks for your amazing work, it’s great! I’m trying to set up my XT30 with this Kodachrome 64 recipe, but how do I set the Film Simulation point? Thanks


    • Ritchie Roesch · May 21

      I appreciate the feedback! I’m not sure I understand the question, though.


  31. Jerry Weisskohl · May 22

    Hi Ritchie and thanks for the great work you are doing with these recipes!

    I just got the new Fuji X-T4 and I am trying to put the recipe for Kodachrome 64 in. I noticed the XT-4 no longer has a NR (noise reduction) setting, or perhaps I can’t seem to find it in the menus, including the Q menu.

    Therefore, I haven’t been able to put the -4 NR setting in. Do you know anything about why NR is no longer available and whether not having the NR will drastically change the recipe? Thanks.


    • Ritchie Roesch · May 22

      I’m not sure. My X100V has NR. I wonder why it’s different on the X-T4. I don’t think it will make a huge difference either way.


  32. mihir garikiparithi · May 24

    I recommend staying away from this version of the recipe on the XT-20. It produces very prominent blacks that dominate the image.

    The older Kodachrome II recipe works much better. 🙂


    • Ritchie Roesch · May 24

      That’s interesting. I’ve used it on my wife’s X-T20 and didn’t notice a difference from my X-T30.


  33. Pingback: Fuji Film Simulations – Why shoot Jpegs & RAW –
  34. Pingback: My Fujifilm X100V Kodachrome 64 Film Simulation Recipe | Fuji X Weekly
  35. Moritz Lauper · 26 Days Ago

    Hey Ritchie,

    Do you know if this recipe also works for the x100f? Will the image be processed the same?



    • Moritz Lauper · 26 Days Ago

      Because for the recipe you have for the x100f, the fotos you uploaded looked way different to the ones here.


    • Ritchie Roesch · 24 Days Ago

      It’s not exactly the same, as it’s not fully compatible with X-Trans III.


  36. Duncan Magade · 4 Days Ago

    Hello, Ritchie.

    A huge THANK YOU for the quality of your work as well as the quality of your sharing. Your blog is a gold mine for Fujifilm users and we are very grateful.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s