My New Fujifilm Camera

I bought a new camera. By “new” I mean new-to-me, as it was in fact a used camera. It’s a few years old, but in decent shape, and functions well. I’m not going to disclose the model just yet, as I’m going to let it be a surprise a little further down this article. I will give you some clues: this is a 16-megapixel fixed-lens Fujifilm camera. Any guesses?

Let’s take a look at some straight-out-of-camera JPEGs from this camera, and then I will reveal what it is.

48620687377_1fcdca285c_c

Red Trike – South Weber, UT

48620197733_2d24d1a86e_c

Leaves By The Shed – South Weber, UT

48650604142_3835b70851_c

Flower Jungle – South Weber, UT

48620713812_c7749eae7d_c

Green Summer Leaf – South Weber, UT

48620197018_295ccd3076_c

Dead Rose – South Weber, UT

48650617622_2aa071e432_c

Factory Authorized Service – Ogden, UT

48650617582_942e900217_c

Mary Wants You To Buy Some Books – Ogden, UT

48650604907_af2154cd31_c

Suburban Fence Monochrome – South Weber, UT

What camera do you think captured these pictures?

My new 16-megapixel fixed-lens Fujifilm camera is…

…an AX350. You’re likely saying to yourself right now, “An AX what?!” The Fujifilm AX350 is an eight-year-old low-budget pocket point-and-shoot zoom camera. It came out around the same time as the original X100. It has a tiny sensor, and really is a point-and-shoot with very few manual controls. It has three film simulations: Standard, which reminds me more of Astia than Provia, Chrome, which is a lot like Classic Chrome but predates it by a few years, and B&W. Changing the film simulation is pretty much all you can do on this camera, besides zooming in and out and activating macro mode.

48620690976_f32c6b8b50_c

48620840182_0fc94e9d6b_c

I was surprised by the image quality. When the ISO is low (ISO 200 and lower, roughly), and just as long as the highlights aren’t too bright, it produces very lovely pictures. The lens seems to perform worst when at the widest or most telephoto ends, but it does well when in-between. It has a narrow window, but when things line up correctly, this camera creates pictures that you’d never guess came from an eight-year-old low-budget point-and-shoot. On the flip side, when things don’t line up, the pictures are just as you’d expect them to be.

A couple of weeks ago I purchased a box of assorted film and digital cameras for under $40. I had no idea if any of it worked, but I thought it was worth the risk. This Fujifilm AX350 was among the cameras in the box. I tried it out just to see if it worked, and I was shocked when I reviewed the pictures! I’m glad that I didn’t pay a whole lot of money for this camera, but I think I might keep it around for a little while, as it seems to have a purpose, and can potentially fulfill a tiny niche role in my bag. I wouldn’t go out looking for one of these cameras to buy, but if someone is trying to give you one, maybe accept the offer. It is a capable photographic tool, even if just barely, in the hands of a skilled photographer.

6 comments

  1. Khürt Williams · September 5, 2019

    “…this is a 16-megapixel fixed-lens Fujifilm camera”

    I immediately thought of the Fuji X-100T.

    • Khürt Williams · September 5, 2019

      Darn. I hit enter too fast. Wanted to add, I was disappointed that it wasn’t the X-100T.

      • Ritchie Roesch · September 5, 2019

        I think it would have been more fun if it were the X100T instead! I figured most would guess X100T, X100S or X80.

  2. bguizol · September 5, 2019

    Like Khürt, I had put my money on an X100S…
    Well congrats on the new camera. The only thing that matters at the end of the day is that it motivates you to go shoot more photos 🙂

    • Ritchie Roesch · September 5, 2019

      I’m not sure if it will motivate me to create more photos or not, but I will attempt to use it on a rare occasion. An X100S would have been much more fun.

  3. Pingback: The 5 Worst Fujifilm Cameras That You Should Never Own | FUJI X WEEKLY

Leave a Reply