New gear | FUJI X WEEKLY

New: Fujifilm X-T30 III & Fujinon XC 13-33mm lens

Last night Fujifilm announced the brand-new X-T30 III camera and Fujinon XC 13-33mm f/3.5-6.3 lens. That’s a lot of threes! I’m not going to spend much time talking about either of these products, but I did want to briefly mention their existence.

The X-T30 III is almost identical to the X-T30 II, which was pretty much identical to the X-T30, launched in early 2019. The big changes for the third iteration are: X-Processor 5 and Film Dial. All of the other changes are directly related to those two.

X-Processor 5 brings with it more computing power and more efficient processing, which allows for autofocus and video improvements (including 6K Open Gate), as well as the Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace Film Simulations. Probably better battery life, too. The Film Dial replaces the Drive Dial, which has now been relocated to a button on the back, similar to the Fujifilm X-E5, X100VI, and X-Pro3. Some people are greatly offended by this, but the Drive button has worked quite sufficiently on those popular models and has been a complete nonissue, so there’s no reason to believe it won’t be the same for the X-T30 III. Some people like to complain for the sake of complaining. The benefit of the Film Dial is that it can store up to three Film Simulation Recipes, bringing the total possible Recipes that can be programmed into the camera at any one time up to 11 (certainly Nigel Tufnel would buy this camera just for this). As of right now, the X-T30 III and X-E5 are the only two cameras capable of 11 Recipes; however, I hope that Fujifilm brings the FS1/FS2/FS3 Recipe option to the X-T50 and X-M5, and any future models with the Film Dial.

The one negative with the Film Dial on the X-T30 III is that—like the X-E5—it’s limited to only six hard-set Film Simulations. Unfortunately, Classic Negative and Nostalgic Neg. were both excluded. For Classic Negative, that’s inexplicable, as it’s one of the most popular and iconic options. I think if Fujifilm had used the same Film Dial found on the X-T50 and X-M5, that would have been better. While the Film Dial isn’t perfect and certainly can be improved, it’s still a feature that I love, and I’m happy to see it on this camera.

The lens? I personally don’t use zooms very often. I’m more of a prime guy myself. It seems like a budget-friendly alternative to the 10-24mm f/4. I’m sure it’s sufficiently good, and a decent starter kit lens. I have no intentions of owning it, personally. Sold with the X-T30 III, I’m sure it’s worthwhile for $150; I definitely wouldn’t spend $400 on one.

There are two (very annoying) complaints that I’ve seen regarding this announcement: Fujifilm should not release any camera until they have Sony-like AF, and where’s the X-Pro4? Let’s discuss both.

I’ve talked about autofocus at great lengths (just type “autofocus” in the search bar), so I won’t spend much energy on it. My basic argument, though, is that Fujifilm’s AF is pretty good, better than what’s existed for the vast majority of photography, and if you can’t make it work for you, it’s largely user error. Yes, your fault. People are offended by that, but sometimes the truth hurts. Once you accept that truth, it reveals a path forward so that you can move beyond your AF obstacles. It might take learning some new skills and/or learning some new things about your camera that you didn’t realize. Fujifilm’s AF is more than sufficient for 99%+ photographers and situations if you know what you’re doing. Those who constantly complain about it have 1) unrealistic expectations (Canikony brands have been making AF for much, much longer, have larger R&D budgets, and larger teams, so it stands to reason that theirs is and always will be better), 2) an unwillingness to accept that they are a part of the problem (more so than the gear), and 3) no motivation for self-improvement.

Can and will Fujifilm improve their AF? Absolutely. I have zero doubts that they’re working hard on that right now and have been for years. Will those improvements have a practical benefit for most of their customers? Probably not, because we’re nearing the peak of an inverted U curve, which means that each improvement will have a smaller and smaller and smaller impact (this is true for every brand, especially Sony and Canon, who might actually be nearing the back side of the curve). Also, realize that any obstacle—including AF woes—can be overcome if you are willing to self-reflect and put in the work. Those who constantly complain about this topic are unwilling on both accounts.

As for the X-Pro4, which I’m predicting will be called X-Pro5, I’m somewhat confident that it will arrive within the next six months, probably announced in January or February. It will likely kick off X-Trans VI, and the X-T30 III will mark the end of the fifth-generation. In other words, the next X-Pro is coming, just have a little more patience.

Anyway, the Fujifilm X-T30 III will hold the important role of budget-friendly non-PASM model with an EVF. The X-T30 II and the X-T30 before it served this purpose very well, and, despite less fanfare, sold a heck-of-a-lot of copies. The X-T30 III will quietly be a major success, too. At only $999, it’s probably the best value camera in the lineup. Yes, some models are cheaper. Yes, some are better. But none quite offer the bang-for-the-buck that the X-T30 III does.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X-T30 III in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T30 III in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T30 III in Charcoal:
Amazon, B&H, Moment
Fujinon 13-33mm f/3.5-6.3:
B&H, Nuzira

My Sony RX1R III Opinions

Posted on July 18 by Ritchie Roesch

Sony surprised the photographic world with the announcement of the RX1R III, a full-frame fixed-lens compact camera. It’s a followup to the RX1R II, which was released 10 years ago. I wasn’t intending to write about it, but a couple people asked for my opinions, so I thought I’d chime in. If you’re interested to know what I think, read on.

Whenever I write these types of articles, invariably someone will get upset. If I criticize any aspect of any camera that’s not Fujifilm, people will say that I’m a hater. If I don’t criticize Fujifilm cameras enough, I’m accused of being a fanboy (meant negatively; I consider it positive). For some people—and they’re found all over the internet but very rarely in real life—I (and other Fujifilm bloggers) must speak only positively about other brands, but at least 50% negative about Fujifilm, or else the opinions expressed are to be disregarded as rubbish. It’s weird. So I think it’s important for me to state right up front where I’m coming from, and if your perspective is similar to mine, maybe you’ll appreciate this article; if not, take all of this with a very large grain of salt, and don’t let it bother you. I like retro-styled cameras (preferably with traditional exposure controls and not PASM) that are compact and lightweight, and that produce excellent straight-out-of-camera pictures that have an analog-like look to them and don’t need to be edited. Fujifilm cameras are by far my favorite, but I have used (and occasionally still use) other brands, including Sony (among others).

Above: Sony a7 IV and the FL “Film Look” profile

To begin with, I think it was smart for Sony to make this camera. It will sell quite well. I have no doubts that this camera will be a hit, and will be a money-maker for them. The specific questions I received about the RX1R III were: how will it impact Fujifilm? Will people leave Fujifilm for this model? Will it affect the sales of the X100VI and GFX100RF? I want to avoid getting into the spec sheet, or criticisms of the rear LCD or things like that—plenty of other people have already discussed those things at length. I’m going to focus more on answering the questions that I was asked.

I don’t think the RX1R III is a direct competitor to the Fujifilm X100VI, but the success of the X100VI certainly influenced Sony to make this camera. And there are enough similarities on paper that one might think they’re competition; however, simply looking at the cameras, it’s obvious they’re significantly divergent in philosophy and design, not to mention price. In my estimation, not many X100VI customers will be lured away by the RX1R III, and not many RX1R III customers will be lured away by the X100VI (probably more will be attracted to the X100VI simply due to cost). I can imagine that some photographers will even have both cameras, although that’s likely going to be a pretty small number. People on YouTube will make the comparison, I’m sure, but overall I don’t see these two models as major competitors.

The RX1R III will more directly compete with the GFX100RF, even though their focal lengths are different. Do you want the bigger, heavier GFX100RF with a larger, higher-resolution sensor and wider but slower lens, or the smaller, lighter RX1R III with a tighter focal length and larger f-stop? Do you want the traditional tactile controls of the Fujifilm, or the PASM and slightly more minimalistic approach of the Sony? Do you want Fujifilm’s renown colors and JPEG engine, or Sony’s better AF and video output? Do you want a striking retro-styled camera, or a more discrete design (to put it nicely)? Do you want to pay $5,100 for the RX1R III, or $4,900 for the GFX100RF? Both have their pluses and minuses, so it really comes down to personal preferences. I’d choose the GFX100RF (and I hope to someday when my budget allows), but that’s just me, and I can see this being a tough choice for some.

Above: Sony a7 IV and the FL “Film Look” profile

Of course, the Sony RX1R III is also competing against the Leica Q3 and Q3 43. I don’t see this camera taking people out of the Leica camp, but it could certainly convince some not to get into it. I can see this as a Leica alternative for those who can’t quite afford to buy a Leica. Mostly, though, the RX1R III is simply a fixed-lens camera for those who are already in the Sony ecosystem. It’s a pocketable-ish camera that’s great for everyday carry or travel due to its compact size, when you don’t want to lug around something like the Sony a7 IV.

I’m not against Sony or the RX1R III. It’s a camera that you’re likely going to shoot RAW with and not JPEG, although Sony has made some notable strides in that department. Most of Sony’s JPEG profiles are so-so, but FL (“Film Look”) is pretty good—kind of similar to the Negative Film effect on the Ricoh GR III and GR IIIx. Apparently there are now three FL options: the original one that’s now called FL1, a more subdued and vintage-looking one called FL2, and a more vibrant and contrasty option called FL3. While these can be customized into Recipes (if someone made them), and Sony does offer interesting customizations like Fade, there’s no faux grain, which is a bit of a bummer. Also, you cannot reprocess the RAW files in-camera, should you need to boost or reduce exposure or apply a different look altogether. From my experience, Sony’s JPEGs can be a bit prone to banding, especially in clear blue sky situations. Fujifilm is a long ways ahead of Sony in regards to camera-made JPEGs, which is one reason why I’m not personally interested in the RX1R III.

I don’t have strong positive or negative opinions about Sony’s new camera. If I was offered one to try, I certainly wouldn’t say no (I doubt that will happen, though). I’m saving up for the GFX100RF, which I’m sure I would like better; however, if I were in the market for a Sony camera, the RX1R III is the only one that I’d consider purchasing right now, and I do think I’d enjoy it, especially with the three FL profiles set to the 1, 2, & 3 positions on the top dial. And that’s my two pennies, for anyone who might be interested.