Upcoming camera | FUJI X WEEKLY

Why the Upcoming Fujifilm X-T30 III is Genius, and makes the X-T30 legendary

Fujifilm is about to announce the X-T30 III, the true successor to the X-T30 II. A lot of people assumed that the Fujifilm X-T50 was the X-T30 II’s successor, but it wasn’t—if you a Fuji X Weekly regular, you’ve known that for about a year-and-a-half now. Tomorrow at 10:00 PM Pacific Time, Fujifilm will unveil the new camera.

I don’t have any inside information, but I expect that the Fujifilm X-T30 III will be 95% the same as the X-T30 II, which was 98% the same as the X-T30. Fujifilm announced the original X-T30 in February of 2019. I remember it well because I preordered it, and later created many Film Simulation Recipes with that camera. The X-T30 II, which was basically a firmware update with a few minor changes, came in October of 2021. The ability to save WB Shift with each C1-C7 Custom Settings preset, as well as Classic Negative and other JPEG tools like Clarity, are the major improvements found on the Mark II version. Now, four years later, Fujifilm is about to release the latest iteration.

From all accounts, the X-T30 III will be the same as the X-T30 II, except with X-Processor 5 (which includes Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace), a Film Dial like what’s on the X-T50 and X-M5, and a Drive Button instead of a Drive Dial. Aside from that, it will be pretty much the same thing as the X-T30 II. I don’t expect any major changes. Overall, it will be a mild refresh.

Why, then, do I think this camera is genius? Because Fujifilm will quietly sell a whole lot of these. It’s not going to go viral like the X100VI. It’s not going to make major headlines. It’s not going to be a hot topic on Reddit or Facebook groups. But Fujifilm will sell a bunch of X-T30 III cameras, more than most other models offered by the brand.

Just four days ago, New York Magazine published in The Strategist section This Fujifilm Camera Gives Me Film Photos Without the Processing by Katherine Gillespie. It’s essentially a review of the Fujifilm X-T30 II. In that article, Katherine states, “Even just using the cheapest 15-45mm kit lens, the camera creates beautiful JPEG photos that require little to no editing to make the colors pop and can be wirelessly transferred to my phone via Fujifilm’s XApp. For me, this is a big sell. While some people seem to enjoy playing around with presets on Lightroom, as a procrastinator who also sort of hates computers, I can’t think of anything worse than shooting in RAW then having to go through and edit hundreds of photos after every social event or vacation. Especially as doing so would also require purchasing a pricey Adobe subscription.”

The article included a small and subtle shoutout to Fuji X Weekly, which was mind-blowing. This follows the New York Times mention in July. I never imagined getting noticed by such large and prestigious publications. But I digress; however, it is a good read, should you want to.

Statements like Katherine’s are why the X-T30 and X-T30 II sold so well, and why soon the X-T30 III will, too. It’s easy to get great-looking photos without the fuss. The cameras are small, lightweight, inexpensive, and straightforward-enough that they’re accessible to anyone and everyone. Even a child can use it and get great results. Robust enough that professionals can use it for serious work, but not so much that first-time hobbyists are in over their heads. That’s indeed a big sell.

No other Fujifilm camera has been given a Mark III iteration. The X-E2 had a second version called X-E2s. There’s the X-H2 and X-H2s, but that’s a slightly different story. There was an X-T3 WW, which was an X-T3 without an external battery charger included in the box. The X-T4 ES is an infrared version of the X-T4. Most models have their time, followed by a successor; the few with a second variation were not given a third. The X-T30 is unique, with a third iteration about to crest the horizon. That elevates the camera to legendary status in my books. There is no doubt in my mind that the X-T30 III will be a great success for Fujifilm, albeit without the fanfare that other models in the X-series often get.

My Sony RX1R III Opinions

Posted on July 18 by Ritchie Roesch

Sony surprised the photographic world with the announcement of the RX1R III, a full-frame fixed-lens compact camera. It’s a followup to the RX1R II, which was released 10 years ago. I wasn’t intending to write about it, but a couple people asked for my opinions, so I thought I’d chime in. If you’re interested to know what I think, read on.

Whenever I write these types of articles, invariably someone will get upset. If I criticize any aspect of any camera that’s not Fujifilm, people will say that I’m a hater. If I don’t criticize Fujifilm cameras enough, I’m accused of being a fanboy (meant negatively; I consider it positive). For some people—and they’re found all over the internet but very rarely in real life—I (and other Fujifilm bloggers) must speak only positively about other brands, but at least 50% negative about Fujifilm, or else the opinions expressed are to be disregarded as rubbish. It’s weird. So I think it’s important for me to state right up front where I’m coming from, and if your perspective is similar to mine, maybe you’ll appreciate this article; if not, take all of this with a very large grain of salt, and don’t let it bother you. I like retro-styled cameras (preferably with traditional exposure controls and not PASM) that are compact and lightweight, and that produce excellent straight-out-of-camera pictures that have an analog-like look to them and don’t need to be edited. Fujifilm cameras are by far my favorite, but I have used (and occasionally still use) other brands, including Sony (among others).

Above: Sony a7 IV and the FL “Film Look” profile

To begin with, I think it was smart for Sony to make this camera. It will sell quite well. I have no doubts that this camera will be a hit, and will be a money-maker for them. The specific questions I received about the RX1R III were: how will it impact Fujifilm? Will people leave Fujifilm for this model? Will it affect the sales of the X100VI and GFX100RF? I want to avoid getting into the spec sheet, or criticisms of the rear LCD or things like that—plenty of other people have already discussed those things at length. I’m going to focus more on answering the questions that I was asked.

I don’t think the RX1R III is a direct competitor to the Fujifilm X100VI, but the success of the X100VI certainly influenced Sony to make this camera. And there are enough similarities on paper that one might think they’re competition; however, simply looking at the cameras, it’s obvious they’re significantly divergent in philosophy and design, not to mention price. In my estimation, not many X100VI customers will be lured away by the RX1R III, and not many RX1R III customers will be lured away by the X100VI (probably more will be attracted to the X100VI simply due to cost). I can imagine that some photographers will even have both cameras, although that’s likely going to be a pretty small number. People on YouTube will make the comparison, I’m sure, but overall I don’t see these two models as major competitors.

The RX1R III will more directly compete with the GFX100RF, even though their focal lengths are different. Do you want the bigger, heavier GFX100RF with a larger, higher-resolution sensor and wider but slower lens, or the smaller, lighter RX1R III with a tighter focal length and larger f-stop? Do you want the traditional tactile controls of the Fujifilm, or the PASM and slightly more minimalistic approach of the Sony? Do you want Fujifilm’s renown colors and JPEG engine, or Sony’s better AF and video output? Do you want a striking retro-styled camera, or a more discrete design (to put it nicely)? Do you want to pay $5,100 for the RX1R III, or $4,900 for the GFX100RF? Both have their pluses and minuses, so it really comes down to personal preferences. I’d choose the GFX100RF (and I hope to someday when my budget allows), but that’s just me, and I can see this being a tough choice for some.

Above: Sony a7 IV and the FL “Film Look” profile

Of course, the Sony RX1R III is also competing against the Leica Q3 and Q3 43. I don’t see this camera taking people out of the Leica camp, but it could certainly convince some not to get into it. I can see this as a Leica alternative for those who can’t quite afford to buy a Leica. Mostly, though, the RX1R III is simply a fixed-lens camera for those who are already in the Sony ecosystem. It’s a pocketable-ish camera that’s great for everyday carry or travel due to its compact size, when you don’t want to lug around something like the Sony a7 IV.

I’m not against Sony or the RX1R III. It’s a camera that you’re likely going to shoot RAW with and not JPEG, although Sony has made some notable strides in that department. Most of Sony’s JPEG profiles are so-so, but FL (“Film Look”) is pretty good—kind of similar to the Negative Film effect on the Ricoh GR III and GR IIIx. Apparently there are now three FL options: the original one that’s now called FL1, a more subdued and vintage-looking one called FL2, and a more vibrant and contrasty option called FL3. While these can be customized into Recipes (if someone made them), and Sony does offer interesting customizations like Fade, there’s no faux grain, which is a bit of a bummer. Also, you cannot reprocess the RAW files in-camera, should you need to boost or reduce exposure or apply a different look altogether. From my experience, Sony’s JPEGs can be a bit prone to banding, especially in clear blue sky situations. Fujifilm is a long ways ahead of Sony in regards to camera-made JPEGs, which is one reason why I’m not personally interested in the RX1R III.

I don’t have strong positive or negative opinions about Sony’s new camera. If I was offered one to try, I certainly wouldn’t say no (I doubt that will happen, though). I’m saving up for the GFX100RF, which I’m sure I would like better; however, if I were in the market for a Sony camera, the RX1R III is the only one that I’d consider purchasing right now, and I do think I’d enjoy it, especially with the three FL profiles set to the 1, 2, & 3 positions on the top dial. And that’s my two pennies, for anyone who might be interested.