Let’s talk about art and photography! Discussing art is kind of a dangerous proposition because it’s subjective, and you’re bound to step on someone’s toes. I think it’s important to talk about art, and I think, even if someone might be offended, it’s beneficial to define it and have some understanding of how it relates to photography and to you, the photographer.
Most pictures are not art. Most people who use a camera are not artists, just like most people who have a paintbrush in their hands are not artists. Most people who sing aren’t recording artists. Not all who whittle are wood-carvers. Those who draw letters are not always calligraphers. You get the idea. Just because something is similar to art, does not make it art. There is something that separates actual art from facsimile “art” that’s not really art at all.
Before jumping too deep into this, I want to clarify that it is perfectly fine that most photographs are not art. There are many different purposes for the photograph, and art is just one of them. There is nothing wrong with pictures that aren’t art, as they have their place, just as photographs as art also have their place. Just because one uses a camera doesn’t mean that person must be or should be an artist. You may have little to no interest in art at all, but you love to photograph, and there is nothing wrong with that whatsoever.
Webster defines art as “the conscious use of skill and creative imagination.” Oxford defines it as “the expression of human creative skill and imagination.” Both of these explanations are similar and describe the two critical components for determining if something is or is not art: skill and imagination. If something is created skillfully but not imaginatively, it’s not art. If something is created imaginatively but not skillfully, it’s not art. It must be both skillfully and imaginatively completed in order to be considered art.
People have different levels of skill and creativity. You might be very skillful but only marginally creative. You can be highly creative but only marginally skillful. Either way, you can still create art, and you can work to improve your shortcomings. You can become more proficient and increase your creativity with practice. Obviously the place you want to be if you wish to be an artist photographer is very skillful and highly creative. That’s a life-long process, and there are no easy one-size-fits-all instant answers. Just continue to work hard and be persistent.
Aside from knowing how to use your camera gear to achieve your desired results, and having imagination enough to know what you want the results to be in the first place, I think that there are a few more aspects to art that should be talked about. Look again at what Webster said of art, paying particular attention to the phrase, “conscious use of…” in the definition. You have to know what it is that you are creating. You have to be able to define it. You should be able to explain it to some extent. If you can’t, it’s not likely art that you’re creating.
I used to show my photographs to people and they’d say, “Oh, that looks nice!” Or, “What a pretty picture!” Then one day someone asked, “What does this picture mean? What is its purpose?” I had no answer because I had never thought of that before. I really didn’t know what to say, and it was kind of embarrassing. I realized that I needed to have an answer for all of my photographs–I needed to know the purpose and meaning of each–but the answer needed to be made prior to exposure, not after. If I’m trying to make it up after the fact, the answer will typically translate as artificial and weak.
If a photograph is art, the photographer should be able to give a clear and concise explanation of the image. It doesn’t necessarily have to be profound. It doesn’t necessarily have to be obvious to the viewer. But the photographer should know clearly in their mind why they created the image and what the meaning of it is. And it’s okay if the viewer doesn’t see it the same way that you see it, it only matters that you know the purpose.
If something is art I believe that it should communicate some message to the viewer. It might be a strong and obvious message, it might be a subtle concept, or it might be an emotion. There should be some kind of nonverbal communication, whether clear or vague, that is presented to the viewer. The photographer must decide what it is that the picture will convey, and then make decisions prior to exposure that will most strongly speak it. The stronger the communication, the stronger the image will be.
The Oxford explanation of art uses the word expression, which can be defined as making one’s thoughts and feelings known. When you are an artist photographer, that’s exactly what you are doing. You are expressing your thoughts and/or feelings to others through your pictures. You are giving the viewer a glimpse of yourself through your photographs. Art is self expression. How you do this is entirely up to you. What glimpses you give of yourself is entirely up to you. You have to make those decisions, then skillfully and imaginatively create something from it.
Not everyone will appreciate your art. Not everyone will get it. In fact, if you are truly expressing yourself, you should expect criticism. People have opinions that are different than yours. People have experiences that are different than yours. People see the world through different eyes than yours. Strangers will look at something that you think is great and they’ll think it’s terrible. That’s completely okay, and you may not realize it, but you do the exact same thing. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
If you are an artist photographer, you have to expect that criticism will come. Take it for what it’s worth, and, most likely, it’s not worth much. Listen to people who you trust, and take their criticism to heart. They mean well with what they say, and they’re just trying to help you. For everyone else, give the criticism a listen, but don’t put much stock into it, and don’t let it bother you. If you’re not getting any criticism at all, it’s most likely because you are not creating art, and you are not expressing yourself through your photographs enough.
Not everyone is an artist photographer, and not every artist photographer is always creating art. Photography as art happens when someone consciously expresses themselves in a masterful and creative fashion. It happens when the photographer communicates thoughts or emotions through pictures. I’m constantly striving to be an artist photographer. Sometimes I think I’ve succeeded, other times I feel like I’ve fallen short. But I keep at it, never giving up, always striving ahead.
The takeaway that I’d like to most impart is that you and I, if we are indeed artists, should continuously be working towards becoming more skilled with our gear and we should be practicing creativity daily. Constantly take baby steps to become a better and more artistic photographer. Even if things are slow developing or mistakes happen, don’t give up but instead keep moving forward. Be persistent. Tomorrow’s photographs can be better than today’s.
Great thoughts. Thank you for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are welcome!
Thank you for this wonderful post, you sir, not only a good photographer, but a good writer as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, I appreciate that! I love to write about as much as I love to photograph. I hope to someday be a published author, but of course that means having time to sit down and write.
Very interesting. That debate of skill is common as well. There are degrees of skill and finish that can define what skill is to the artist. It’s the consistency that qualifies it.
Very good and insightful post. When looking at photography as art, I think that we need to consider two aspects:
1. is photography on its own an art form (like painting, sculpting)?
2. is every photograph a piece of art?
Reading your essay above, it seems to me that it is geared towards answering the second aspect. Am I right?
I shared some time ago a couple of thoughts about photography as art form on my blog.
In case you are interested 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
In my opinion, the answer to #1 was profoundly decided many years ago by Adams, Weston, Cartier-Bresson, Lange and other greats from that era. It’s not even a question anymore, and anyone who thinks otherwise doesn’t have a basic understand art or art history.
I will take a look at both of your articles.
Thank you for commenting! —Ritchie
Fully agree. And thanks!
Really interesting views and I agree with most. But you seem to be saying that art cannot be created by a happy accident. I sometimes will take a photograph intending one thing but when I see the result something else is apparent. Maybe it is even better than what I originally intended. If this isn’t art what is it?
Happy accidents rarely are art, because happy accidents rarely speak anything to the viewer. I think the keyword is “rarely” which means sometimes happy accidents can be art. This is my opinion, but I am not necessarily some expert on what is or isn’t art, so different people can have different opinions.
I always wanted to be an artist, but ended up working as a graphic designer. When I was 53, I went back to university to study for a degree in fine art and eventually graduated 6 years later with first class honours. I’ve taken photos all my adult life, but I’d never had any desire to be perceived as “a photographer” and getting my degree made me realise I didn’t want to be perceived as “an artist” either. The one thing I learned from doing my degree was that art is whatever you think it is – or isn’t – and it’s perfectly possible for a work of art to be simultaneously “good” and “bad”, depending on who’s looking at it. We tend to categorise ourselves and the things that we do, and in the process we create rules and conventions that then dictate our responses, but for me, photography is undoubtedly art. It can be intentional or accidental and it doesn’t really matter what the artist’s intentions are, because the viewer will always see it through the prism of their own experiences, prejudices and preconceptions. Obviously that’s all just my opinion!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the thoughtful response, I appreciate it!
LikeLiked by 1 person