Your Camera’s Warranty Might Be Voided

According to Fujifilm, using any non-licensed program (including Fujifilm’s own SDK) “to connect to, or control, any compatible Fujifilm camera, will void the camera’s limited product warranty.” I spoke with Fujifilm and confirmed this to be true. I was also told that they only give licenses to large corporations “like Adobe.” I bring this up because more and more, there are programs and apps that can connect to your Fujifilm camera, to remote control it or push Recipes to it, and so forth. Very few of these seem to tell you that doing so voids your camera’s warranty. I was also told by someone at Fujifilm that each time you connect, a marker is left in the camera, which Fujifilm could find to prove that a non-licensed program was connected to the camera.

Personally, I would be extremely cautious connecting any Fujifilm model that is still under warranty to any non-licensed software or app (anything that’s not officially from or supported by Fujifilm). Depending on your country, X-series gear can have up to a three year warranty, and GFX up to five year. You may want to look into the specifics of your camera and country to determine the exact length of your manufacturer warranty; for a lot of people, it will be just one year.

I bring this up because most of these programs and apps don’t tell you this. The developers are well aware (or at least should be) that if you connect your camera to their software it will void your warranty, but I think they’re afraid that if you knew the risk, you’d be less inclined to use their program, and they’d be less profitable. They’d rather be a bit shady than lose potential customers. The risk that they themselves are taking is that if your warranty gets denied and they didn’t disclose to you that using their app would void the warranty, you could hold them accountable (although good luck with that). My guess is that thousands (maybe tens of thousands) of Fujifilm photographers have unknowingly voided their warranty—they are completely unaware, and might be learning about it for the first time right now. That’s terrible, and it should be unacceptable.

With some of these programs, it’s even more shady than that. For example, many of them aggregate Recipes; however, some of the creators of those Recipes have no idea that their Recipes are even in the apps, and much of the time they are not even given credit, which is a shame. Worse, many photographers (who create Recipes) have their photos in these apps without permission or even credit (in other words, illegally). Someone who doesn’t even make Recipes is profiting off of those who do, including off of their photos. You’ll find tons of my Recipes, and when I’ve asked them to be removed, I have been told that there’s nothing technically illegal about it, so pound sand. That might be true (there could be a strong plagiarism argument), but it’s not cool in the least to do so. Someone who doesn’t even make Recipes shouldn’t be profiting off of those who do. With regards to my photos, that’s a daily (and uphill) battle to get them removed. If you’ve ever created and published a Recipe anywhere on the internet, there’s a good chance you’ll find it in at least one of these programs, and maybe your photos, too.

My Fujicolor 100 Gold Recipe and my photo used without permission or even credit in someone else’s app.

I’ve hesitated to say anything because some will take this as sour grapes. They will think that I’m just upset over competition. Look, there are legitimate creators doing wonderful things for the community, and I’ve happily pointed them out and linked to their websites or channels many times on Fuji X Weekly over the years. I’m for the community, and I think it’s great that so many are not only using Recipes, but are creating them, too. It’s a wonderful thing, and I never imagined that all of this would grow and grow and grow so much. It’s truly an honor to have a front-row seat. What I’m saying is: does that non-official-Fujifilm program that connects to your camera, whether software or app, tell you that by doing so your warranty will be voided? If not, that’s a big problem. You should be made aware, and from there you can make an educated decision to connect or not connect. If it’s hidden in the fine print, that’s an issue, too, because few actually read the fine print, yet it absolves the developer of responsibility.

Of course, Fujifilm themselves deserve some blame. You should be able to push Recipes into the Custom Settings presets (C1-C7 for most cameras, C-C6 or C1-C4 for others) right from the X App. You can do it from X RAW Studio, but it isn’t obvious. For that matter, there should be a mobile version of X RAW Studio. There’s a lot more that Fujifilm could and should do to make adding Recipes to your camera easier (something I’ve encouraged them to do, and even offered my assistance with). And maybe it’s a bit my own fault, too, because I’ve spent more than a year trying to go about all of this “the right way” by attempting to work with Fujifilm on something that was highly unlikely to ever work out, and ultimately didn’t. Because of this, my own implementation of a similar feature has been delayed and delayed and delayed. I desperately want to avoid voiding your warranty. If I did make something that would void your warranty, I would make everyone very well aware and not hide it, so that you could make whatever informed decision that you’re comfortable with.

Anyway, I need to end this post. I truly hope nobody gets hosed by an unknowingly voided warranty. Make whatever choice that you want, but I do think it’s beyond time for someone to say something publicly, so at least you know the potential consequences of the choice that you are making. I’m sorry that it has to come from me, I’d rather not be the messenger. I’ve put this off for a very long time hoping that something would change, but it seems to only have gotten worse with time.

Edit: I want to add a few quick things. First, you should learn the warranty laws that are specific to your country and state/region. Some places have stronger protections than others, some of which may prevent your warranty from automatically being voided just because you connect to an unlicensed program. Second, just because technically speaking your warranty has been voided, that doesn’t mean that Fujifilm won’t still honor it. They may or may not—in my estimation, depending on exactly what the problem is, there is a good chance that they will honor it. Third, even if they don’t, you might still have legal options (I’m not an attorney, nor am I an expert in warranty laws). I am only trying to make people aware of the potential risk, because they should absolutely be aware that there is a risk.

Thoughts on Apps & App Development

Since I have three apps now—Fuji X Weekly, Ricoh Recipes, and RitchieCam—I’ve been asked by several people for advice on app development. I’ve also been meaning to discuss some of the things I’ve learned, because it’s interesting, and maybe it’s useful information to a few of you. I’ve hesitated to write this as it might seem like a boring topic—perhaps even controversial or offensive at times—and unrelated to Fujifilm, but I truly hope that by the end there’ll be something for you. I write from real-world experience, but I’ve also researched this fairly extensively over the last year-and-a-half (including reading several books on the topics), so I’m not making this stuff up.

I have received a lot of criticism over the pricing structure of my apps. There are three options: free, freemium (the app is free, but there’s a fee for some features), and premium (not free). Within freemium and premium are three options: one-time fee (to unlock everything), à la carte fees (pay individually for this or that), and subscriptions (reoccurring monthly or annually).

One-time fees used to be the most common, but are much less so now. Why? Apps used to be popular for a season, then the next trend would make them irrelevant, so the life cycle of apps was typically pretty short, usually two years or less. Nowadays apps have a much longer lifespan—often a decade or even indefinitely—so the one-time fee model makes no sense. You wouldn’t buy a vacuum cleaner and expect it to be up-kept and improved upon by the manufacturer for years to come—not without additional fees, anyway—but people expect that from apps and software. Apps that use this model are abandoned as soon as new customers become less frequent. There are numerous apps in the Google Play Store and Apple App Store right now that succumbed to this fate. In my research I came across countless apps that hadn’t been updated in years, where the most recent review was two years old, and it was begging the developer to update the out-of-date app. This model is good for short-term projects, but is not good if you want an app to be around for years and years to come, because as soon as the financial motivation dries up, the app is neglected and abandoned.

The apps that use à la carte fees are often gaming and dating apps. You pay to unlock something, such as a level redo, puzzle hint, or something like that. This can be affective, but you have to be careful because if not done tastefully it can come across as scammy. People don’t like paying “hidden” fees around every corner.

So that leaves us with the subscription model, which is a win-win, and allows the app to continuously improve into something greater over time. This is best-case for the developer because it ensures continuous resources, and best-case for the customer because it ensures the app will improve regularly over time and not be left abandoned. More and more apps are going this route, and it is now the most common model. It’s all rainbows and roses except for one thing: many people don’t like subscriptions in general, and some people passionately oppose it with all their heart, as if it were some great evil.

Premium apps are good if you can get the word out. It can be tough to gain traction, because most people don’t want to pay for things, so they won’t buy it. That’s why freemium is often preferred. Here’s the thing, though: 95% of people will use the app for free, and only 5% will subscribe—it’s actually more like 8% on Apple and 2% on Android (yes, this is true!). Apple users are much more likely to spend money on apps than Android, but either way we’re still talking about small percentages. That also means that 95% of people will pass on premium apps. With freemium, for 95 people who are using it for free, they’ll tell others, which will lead to 20 new users, and one of those will subscribe. That’s why a lot of developers choose freemium over premium—it’s a little easier to gain the traction you need to be successful.

Now let’s talk about free apps, or even the “free” aspect of most freemium apps. There are two sayings: there’s no such thing as a free lunch, and if you aren’t the customer than you are the product. Both are true. In addition to all of the time I put into creating, maintaining, and improving apps, there’s a real cost that I pay out of pocket. In fact, each time one of my apps is opened on your phone, I am charged an extraordinarily small fee, which does add up. Just because you are not paying, doesn’t mean someone else isn’t paying on your behalf. That lunch might be free to you, but it isn’t free.

If you aren’t willing to be the customer, app developers turn you into the product. They sell you ads or—much worse—sell your data. Ads are annoying, but a lot of people are willing to put up with them in exchange for something being free. For app developers, unless you have millions of users, ad revenue doesn’t add up into anything more than pocket change. The real money is in data harvesting. Companies want to serve personalized ads that are highly affective, and they need to know everything about you in order to do this. It’s a multi-billion dollar industry because it works, and, because of this, you unknowingly spend much more than the cost of an app subscription. That’s the cost of being the product.

Here’s the creepy part. If I were to harvest data with, say, the RitchieCam app, I could know so much about you. If I have access to your GPS, I could know where you live, and, comparing that with Zillow, I could know more-or-less how affluent you are. I could track where you work, and, referencing Google maps, could know what industry you are in. I could know where you shop. I could know where you eat out at. I could know where your kids go to school. Since I have access to your camera and library, I could deduce the size of your family, your family’s genders, who your friends are, if you have pets, I could read the text on your screenshots. I could do all of this and so much more. Rest assured that I do not collect or sell any data whatsoever, which isn’t particularly common, because I’m leaving money on the table. Most free and freemium apps are indeed collecting and selling your data, because there’s no free lunch, so they’ve turned you into the product for profit.

What I have said might sound farfetched, but it isn’t. In fact, what I pointed out was really just the tip of the iceberg. You have apps on your phone right now—apps that you regularly use and trust—that go well beyond what I described in the previous paragraph. Have you ever talked about something out-loud and five minutes later see an ad for it? Ads are highly personalized and targeted because your apps know so much about you, and companies pay big bucks for that knowledge, because it means even bigger bucks—your bucks—become their profits.

Again, I want to make it clear that none of my apps collect or sell data. It’s to my own detriment that I do this, but I do it for you because you deserve it, and it’s the right thing to do, even if it is rare. On my apps, you are never, ever the product. I “pay for your lunch” for you if you are using the apps for free, and I happily do that.

You might be surprised to hear this, but I am told frequently that I do not give enough away for free. I am told that I am selfish and greedy because I have the audacity to charge “so much” for things. I am told that my approach is wrong. I am sorry if you feel that way, but I deserve something for my work, right? Trust me, I’m not rolling in the dough or becoming wealthy from this. I have enough to put food on the table, a roof over my head, and take trips sometimes (adventures are often more worthwhile investments than gear), but I couldn’t go out and purchase a GFX system right now. This is to say that the perception of my compensation is often exaggerated and misunderstood—I’m doing alright, but if I were indeed greedy and selfish I could be doing better. The accusations are hurtful because they’re untrue.

There’s a lot that can be debated on what exact paths are the best paths. I chose the freemium model after much research and advice from others with experience within the industry. Some might disagree with that decision. I chose not to turn those using the apps for free into products. Some would say that’s leaving money on the table, and everyone else is doing it anyway. I chose the subscription prices for a reason—I’ve received a lot of criticism from that, and many “Monday morning quarterbacks” tell me that I got it all wrong, although the books I’ve read and those I’ve spoken with within the industry tell me that I am where I should be (I “got it right” thanks to all the research that wen’t into the decisions to begin with, but there’s always different paths and varying philosophies). As Abraham Lincoln stated, “You can please some of the people some of the time, all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can never please all of the people all of the time.” In other words, nothing that I do will make everyone happy, but I hope that many people find my apps to be helpful and worthwhile tools. I hope that most of those who subscribe find it to be worth their money, and that they don’t feel ripped off or swindled—that they’re good values for what they deliver. Not all will feel that way, though, and that’s just the way it is.

For those wanting to create an app, you have to know that, no matter how much research you do, and no matter how much of your heart, soul, blood, sweat, and tears you pour into it, there are some who won’t like it and some who will criticize your decisions. Mean and hurtful things will be said about you. You can’t make everyone happy, and you have to know that and accept that, but if you do what you believe is right—especially if you’ve done extensive research—you’re going to make some people happy just for the fact that you did it. The tricky part is figuring out how to maximize happiness and minimize the dissatisfaction, while also being fair to yourself, because you deserve satisfaction and compensation for your time, money, and hard work that you poured into it. It’s definitely a difficult and precarious balancing act that has to be regularly analyzed and addressed, and perhaps adjusted if needed.

I know this lengthy article has nothing to do with the regular content of this website, but I hope it is helpful for a few of you, and that most of you got something out of it (even if it is simply awareness of what your apps are doing behind the scenes). I didn’t write this as any sort of complaint or “woe is me” statement, because I don’t mean it that way whatsoever. I am quite happy with what I’m doing, and I know that it is helpful to many of you—it is even having an impact on the photography continuum, something I never imagined would happen! I’m really honored and blessed to be a part of this. I’m extraordinarily flattered and humbled if I’ve impacted your photography in some small way. It really is my pleasure to do all that I do for the Fujifilm community. With all of that said, I think it is important to be authentic, which means being vulnerable, and sharing this information is one way to do that. Perhaps somehow this was a meaningful article for some of you, and maybe it was worth your time today to read, even if it wasn’t about Fujifilm cameras.

Fuji X Weekly App: Android Apple
Ricoh Recipes App: Android Apple
RitchieCam App: Apple