Freedom & Fujifilm Recipes

Red Barn – Ronks, PA – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodachrome 64

In an interesting conversation I had recently, someone mentioned that Fujifilm Recipes are great because they provide freedom—freedom from the computer and Lightroom (or other RAW editing software), freedom from indecisive aesthetic choices, freedom from unfinished work (such as RAW files just sitting around waiting to be edited)—but it can be too much freedom sometimes. For example, I’ve published over 400 Film Simulation Recipes for Fujifilm cameras; while having so many options allows you to find a great match for your subject, situation, and style, narrowing it down can feel overwhelming. Perhaps there are too many choices. “Limitations are necessary constraints for creativity,” he told me, “and freedom is most productive when it’s narrowed on purpose.” In other words, intentional constraints. Sometimes, less is more. Finding the “right” Recipe out of hundreds might seem daunting, but even choosing from among the seven programmed into your camera’s C1-C7 Custom Settings presets might be too much.

Something to try, he suggested, is to program fewer Recipes into your camera—perhaps three, or even just one. Instead of scrolling through your C1-C7 options before every shot, try pre-selecting one, two, or three Recipes before you head out, and commit to just those. Use just those for the duration of your walk, day, or trip. When the look is already decided, your attention naturally shifts to light and framing. Instead of asking, “Which Recipe should I use?” Ask, “How can I make this scene work with what I’ve chosen?” When selecting your Recipes (if it’s more than one), consider having one specifically for color daylight, one specifically for color nighttime, and one for black-and-white. If the Recipes are too similar in aesthetic or serve a similar purpose, it makes it less obvious which one to shoot with.

Ghost Train – Flagstaff, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100RF – Fluorescent Night

Analog photographers understood all of this instinctively. Loading a roll of film was a commitment for 12, 24, or 36 frames. You accepted the look, learned its strengths and weaknesses, and worked within them. That constraint didn’t stifle expression, it shaped it. On X and GFX cameras, you can benefit from that same discipline by using one Recipe long enough to understand where it shines and where it fails. You adapt rather than escape. Using a single Recipe for an extended period—days, weeks, or a full project—can be especially revealing and rewarding.

Fujifilm Recipes work best when they’re treated like film stocks: chosen with purpose, used with commitment, and understood through experience. When you narrow your options on purpose, the freedom they offer becomes more focused, more useful, and ultimately more gratifying. Freedom in photography isn’t about having endless options at every moment, but about choosing a direction and going far enough down that path to discover something meaningful. When freedom is narrowed on purpose, it stops being a distraction and starts being productive.

Low Clouds Over Manhattan – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Tri-X 400

This is all theoretical, of course, and I don’t want to leave you hanging with that. Let me give a practical example of how this could be implemented. As you might have guessed from the photos in this article, you could choose the Kodachrome 64 Recipe for daylight photography, Fluorescent Night for nighttime, and Kodak Tri-X 400 for B&W. Alternatively, you could choose Pacific Blues for daytime, CineStill 800T for night, and Classic B&W for monochrome. There are a ton of possible three-Recipe combinations, but the larger point is to pick three (or fewer), and use those for an outing, a day, a month, or a project to better familiarize yourself with the strengths and limitations of those specific Recipes. If you do this enough times, you’ll be intimately aware of which Recipe to use for each subject and circumstance you encounter, and you’ll be more in tuned with your personal style.

I have often told people that when I started creating and using Fujifilm Recipes, I experienced a ton of freedom. Photography became more enjoyable to me when I detached editing software from it. Because I was spending much less time at a computer, I had more time to photograph (increasing productivity) and also more time to spend with my family. But as more and more Recipes are created (which is a good thing), it can be difficult to know which to use and when to use them. Narrowing it down through experience—simply by picking one, two, or three and using those for a period—is a great way to help with this. Another option is to use the Categories feature in the Fuji X Weekly App (available for Android and Apple), which can help to really zero in on specific genres, styles, and situations. For example, if you want a retro Americana aesthetic that’s good for midday light, you can find that. By selecting multiple Categories, you can significantly narrow down the selection to assist in finding the perfect Recipe for your needs.

Intentionalism – Moving From More To Less

46581367605_0c9dcecf2a_c

The old house. Captured with a Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 35mm f/2.

Less is more. That short and simple statement is true in both photography and in life. Less time commitments. Less money spent. Less accumulating stuff. Less frustrations. Less worrying. Less stress. More time spent with family and friends. More generosity. More doing what you love. More living life right now.

In America, and many other parts of the world, materialism is strong, and it constantly demands more. You need the best, the newest, the largest, and the most-expensive things that you can afford. If the Jones’ have it, you need it now! Envy is everywhere, and it’s difficult to escape its cold, choking grasp. People judge you on your possessions, at least that’s what you’re told, so your possessions better be good. You need to make a good impression quickly, as you might not get a second chance. You aren’t who you are, you are what you have. It’s an incredibly sad and selfish way to live, but it’s normal for a lot of people. I’m guilty of living this way just as much as the next person, but I’m tired of the materialistic life.

The opposite of materialism is minimalism, which is living with the absolute least amount of stuff that you need to survive. If you don’t need it, you shouldn’t have it. If it doesn’t add value to your life, you shouldn’t have it. It’s not about things, it’s about not having things. I’m not against minimalism, but I do feel like it’s a rabbit hole that can miss the point. Having less can be very good, but there’s a point where the pursuit of it can be oppressive and as equally vain as the pursuit of frivolous stuff.

49335221093_53c5c65775_c

View from the old house. Captured with a Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 50-230mm.

There’s a reasonable middle ground, where you’re not consumed by consumerism and you’re not subservient to minimalism. It’s called intentionalism, which is being intentional with your time and treasures. The idea is that everything you own should serve a purpose or bring you joy. If it doesn’t have a purpose in your life or if it doesn’t bring you joy, you don’t need it, so get ride of it! It’s about living with less. It’s having less clutter; having less things that you don’t really need taking up space in your life. Everything that you buy should be purchased very intentionally. Thoughtful consideration is required for what you spend money on. Spend less on junk. You shouldn’t be a servant to money, but instead money should serve you. Also, be careful of things that rob your time, because time is incredibly short.

Cut down on what you’ve accumulated. Lessen time spent unnecessarily. Trim what you spend money on. Scale down yourself, so that you can gain what those things can never provide. Reduce, so that you can obtain joy. Reduce, so that you can spend more time with family and friends. Reduce, so that you can be more generous with others. Reduce, so that you can live more freely. Not less for the sake of less, but less for the sake of more.

I don’t want to sound too preachy; I’m writing these things to myself just as much as I’m writing them to you. I’m telling you about this philosophical road that I’m beginning to journey down because you might notice some changes. Actually, the journey began several months ago, but the changes will become more obvious on Fuji X Weekly as time goes on.

49405942277_74cc2d425d_c

View from the new house. Captured with a Fujifilm X-T1 & Funinon 35mm f/2.

Something that I’ve been working towards is fewer articles on this blog, yet higher quality content. I want to spend less time on insignificant posts, and use that time instead for more meaningful articles. I hope that this will improve Fuji X Weekly. Another change is that I sold my house and moved. For me, a big part of intentionalism is downsizing, which I’ve been doing, and now I live in a different town. That will affect my pictures in some way, although I’m not certain exactly how at the moment. Anytime that you change where you’re photographing, it will change your photography, at least a little.

How does intentionalism relate to photography and Fujifilm? Well, for me, Fujifilm cameras save me a ton of time because I can rely on camera-made JPEGs. I rarely sit at a computer editing pictures. I can use that time for other things, such as playing with my kids or a date night with my wife or visiting a friend or capturing more pictures. This isn’t new for me, but it does fit well with this philosophy. Another way that this relates is that I should only own gear that I need (serves a purpose) or that brings me joy. Of course, all of it brings me joy! But things that sit on a shelf collecting dust and taking up space, rarely used, aren’t really bringing joy, they’re just clutter. If something is working well for me, there’s no need to replace it just because something new came out. It’s good to get your money’s worth out of what you buy before replacing it. Buy things of quality and really use them, and don’t be in a hurry to upgrade.

Intentionalism is a journey towards simplicity. It’s similar to minimalism, but the end goal isn’t less for the sake of less, it’s less for the sake of more. It’s a path towards joy and a meaningful life, where I’m less important and those around me are more important. It’s a journey of generosity. It’s finding ways to make life simpler so that I can focus more on what’s really important. Less can indeed be more.