Asahi-Pentax Super-Takumar 135mm f/3.5 + Fujifilm X-T30

Fujifilm XT30 Blog Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 135mm f/3.5

Asahi-Pentax Super-Takumar 135mm f/3.5 Lens & Fujifilm X-T30.

The Super-Takumar 135mm f/3.5 lens was made by the Asahi Optical Company in Japan in the 1960’s and 1970’s for Pentax M42 screw mount cameras. There were a few nearly identical versions of the Asahi Takumar 135mm f/3.5 lens manufactured, each with a different coating applied to the glass, but otherwise identical. I love pairing my Fujifilm X-T30 with vintage lenses, such as this one. You will need an M42 to Fuji-X adapter to attach it to your Fujifilm X camera. The Asahi-Pentax Super-Takumar 135mm f/3.5 lens is a long telephoto prime that won’t break the bank, but is it any good?

This lens, unsurprisingly, is all manual (don’t let the “A” and “M” switch on the side fool you). You will have to manually focus it and manually adjust the aperture. There’s nothing automatic about it. If you are not used to lenses like this, it might take some practice to get comfortable using it. Also, being a longer lens without image stabilization, you’ll need to use faster shutter speeds or tripod to avoid blur.

As I stated in my Fujinon 90mm f/2 lens review, the 135mm focal length used to be very common. It was one of the first primes you’d add to your bag. It’s much less common nowadays. Because of the APS-C crop factor, this lens has a full-frame focal-length equivalency of about 202mm, which makes it a long telephoto option. Fujifilm only makes one prime lens this long, in fact, but it costs a heck-of-a-lot, so if you want a long telephoto prime, you have to look elsewhere, such as vintage glass like this one, or buy a telephoto zoom.

Fujifilm XT30 blog Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 135mm f/3.5

Fujifilm XT30 Blog Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 135mm f/3.5

The Asahi Takumar 135mm lens is fairly small and lightweight for how long it is. At 0.75 pounds, it weighs noticeably less than the previously mentioned Fujinon 90mm lens. It’s made of metal and feels pretty sturdy. Asahi made quality lenses, so this is not surprising. Even though this lens is quite old, it seems like it has a lot of life left.

Sharpness is a tale of two lenses, with the focus distance being the key factor. At near and medium distances, the Asahi Takumar 135mm is quite sharp. There is perhaps some softness, particularly in the corners, at f/3.5 (the maximum aperture), but by f/5.6 it’s pretty sharp across the entire frame. Peak sharpness is around f/8 or f/11, with diffraction setting in at f/16, and f/22 (the minimum aperture) being only marginally usable. Beyond medium focus distances, the lens becomes less sharp as you move towards infinity, and has only mediocre sharpness when focused at infinity, about what one would expect from a cheap zoom and not a prime.

There’s quite a bit of chromatic aberrations in the corners no matter the aperture, but the smaller the aperture the worse it seems to get; there’s very little in the middle at all apertures. I haven’t noticed any vignetting. There’s a tiny amount of pincushion distortion that will only be noticed when photographing brick walls. This lens does not control flare well at all, producing a hazy-type flare that significantly reduces contrast. Sunstars are medicore. Bokeh is not especially good looking.

Fujifilm Blog Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 135mm f/3.5

Fujifilm Blog Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 135mm f/3.5

The lens functions well. The focus ring is smooth. The aperture clicks at the f-stops. I have had no problems pairing it with my Fujifilm X-T30. There are good and bad points to the image quality that the Asahi Takumar 135mm lens produces. In fact, I would say that this is the worst Takumar lens I’ve used, but it is still capable of capturing good images. You have to understand its strengths and weaknesses, and use it accordingly.

Despite the negative points, this lens can usually be found for less than $50, and sometimes for less than $25, which makes it a great bargain! You can find cheap M42 to Fuji-X adapters that will allow you to attach the lens to your camera; mine was about $10. Considering the price, if you want a 200mm equivalent focal-length lens, it’s worth taking a chance on this one.

Sample photographs, all captured using this Asahi-Pentax Super-Takumar 135mm f/3.5 lens attached to my Fujifilm X-T30:

48927762992_bb80937f2a_c

Flowing Fall – Bountiful, UT

48942211727_459c5f3cff_c

Apple, Hangin’ On – South Weber, UT

48940261151_400f533b55_c

Young Smile – South Weber, UT

48939709928_af1e09edd0_c

White Stars – Roy, UT

48939729948_d8bfce8087_c

I See Red – Riverdale, UT

48927789852_b5b000f972_c

Plant Leaves – South Weber, UT

48944960893_7286633f5f_c

Becoming Autumn Yellow – South Weber, UT

48939709903_ddb44a99d7_c

Cold On Top – South Weber, UT

48927790522_8cb9ef1137_c

Peaks & Ridges – South Weber, UT

48939452528_a194a13cbb_c

Last Light on the Clearing Mountain – South Weber, UT

48939451848_d3b5e2f531_c

Sunset Red Peak – South Weber, UT

48941473183_8f936ac08f_c

White Cloud Over Black Mountain – South Weber, UT

48940192597_b3afbb723a_c

Mount Ogden #1 – Riverdale, UT

48940261086_dd365cae8c_c

Mount Ogden #2 – Riverdale, UT

48945009108_a4882f2a9e_c

Coffee & Cameras – South Weber, UT

See also:
Industar 69 + Fujifilm X-T30
Fujifilm Gear

16 comments

  1. kd5urs · October 25, 2019

    If my memories of old Pentax days are correct, the A/M switch is for the diaphragm, on camera which required stop-down metering.

  2. Marc Beebe · October 25, 2019

    The Super Takumars are all top quality lenses, providing they haven’t suffered with age. I have a 28mm, 35mm, and 50mm. The 28 is a favourite for use on my Canon DSLR. The 35 would be too, except that its glass has yellowed over the years and so every image needs colour correction. I hope to find another one day that isn’t discoloured.

    • Ritchie Roesch · October 25, 2019

      I hope you find a good copy of the 35mm, I have heard great things about it. Thank you for the input!

    • Karl Waller · July 1, 2022

      The yellow caste is not the coating but the thoriated (radioactive) glass itself. As the Thorium breaks down it causes the yellow tint. Set your 35mm under a UV light. When mine arrived, it was quite discolored and I put it on a small mirror and left the light on it for a few days. I left the aperture wide open. It cleared up almost perfectly. This can also be done by putting it in direct sunlight but you have to leave it sitting a lot longer, a week or more.
      I run mine on my Pentax K1 and it gives me beautiful photos.

  3. chan.kit.sg · October 26, 2019

    More of these type of posts please. Love it.

    • Ritchie Roesch · October 26, 2019

      I hope to do just that. Glad you like it!

  4. Pingback: Asahi SMC Macro-Takumar 50mm f/4 + Fujifilm X-T30 | Fuji X Weekly
  5. Pingback: Asahi SMC-Takumar 50mm f/1.4 + Fujifilm X-T30 | Fuji X Weekly
  6. Pingback: Asahi Super-Takumar 28mm f/3.5 + Fujifilm X-T30 | Fuji X Weekly
  7. Pingback: Photoessay: Autumn 2019 | Fuji X Weekly
  8. Iftach · June 27, 2020

    Hi!

    Loved your photos and style. can you please share which Adapter did you use? I’ve heard that an a adapter, even a cheap one, could make quite a difference.

    Thanks!

    • Ritchie Roesch · June 28, 2020

      It’s a very cheap adapter I found on eBay several years ago. It doesn’t have a brand name, but I’m sure it wasn’t more than $10. It works well, never had a problem.

  9. Mohd Noor Azri Bin Othman · November 26

    I got mine for the X-T30 as well. BTW do you have trouble shooting in bright daylights? cos mine having issue with some sort of lights bleeding in and making my images kinda hazy. I use lens hood as well and it does not solve the issue. I don’t have that problem shooting indoors.

    • Ritchie Roesch · November 26

      No, not much haze on my copy. I’d look for scratches or fungus on the lens, that could cause it. I have a different lens with scratches, and that’s exactly what it does.

Leave a Reply to Marc BeebeCancel reply