Panasonic | FUJI X WEEKLY

My Panasonic L10 Thoughts

A few people have asked for my opinion on the newly announced Panasonic L10 compact zoom. The news came while I was traveling, so I didn’t pay any attention to it. After learning more about the camera, I really don’t have any strong opinions. But, since some of you asked, I will share my thoughts, which probably aren’t worth a whole lot, maybe not even two pennies.

The first thing I noticed is that a lot of reviewers are comparing it to the Fujifilm X100VI. For example, Amateur Photographer says, “A new contender to dethrone the Fujifilm X100VI.” Another website states, “Move over Fujifilm X100VI.” I don’t know if there is a single review that doesn’t make at least a passing comparison, while some seem to make it the thesis of their article. But the Fujifilm X100VI is not a very close competitor; if there is an X-series model that would most closely align with the L10, it’s the long-discontinued Fujifilm X30. Should Fujifilm decide to revive that camera line, that would be a direct competitor to the Panasonic. The X100VI is not in the same class, nor is it a similar ethos, so it’s very much apples-to-oranges.

If you look from a distance and squint your eyes, the L10 has a vague design resemblance to the X100VI. I don’t mean this as an insult—it’s stated with humor [insert laughing emojis here]—but it looks like a Temu X100-series knockoff. I’m sure in-person, the L10 has a refined quality and feels good to hold. I’m making no commentary on the build quality, only that nobody will confuse the two cameras just by looking at them; however, they do have some rangefinder-style similarities, but the Panasonic is a PASM camera, while the Fujifilm has traditional tactile dials. The two cameras also have very similar size and weight specs, which means the L10 is surprisingly bulky for a fixed-lens M43 camera. The X100VI is only $100 more.

From there, the similarities end. If you want a fixed-lens compact zoom, Fujifilm doesn’t offer that right now. If you prefer traditional tactile controls, Panasonic doesn’t offer that currently. The comparisons between the L10 and the X100VI make very little sense, so I’m not sure why it’s so pervasive. I find it difficult to believe that there is anyone carefully considering buying one of these two cameras, and having trouble deciding. The differences are so significant, the answer should be immediately obvious, whichever way it goes.

None of this is intended to be negative towards the Panasonic L10, it’s more about the reviewers. I’m sure the L10 is an excellent camera that makes wonderful pictures and is fun to use, and everyone who buys one will be happy with their purchase. I’m not interested in it personally, but we’re all different people with divergent likes and needs. The L10 and X100VI can happily coexist in the camera market; the L10 will likely sell a whole lot of copies, and the X100VI will continue to sell a whole lot of copies. In both cases, they will sell as many as they make with no problems. I’m sure in a couple of years Leica will announce the Panasonic L10 under their own brand name for a bunch more money, and people will buy it up.

From a marketing point-of-view, the name “L10” isn’t very catchy. It reminds me of the old Lockheed L-1011. Or maybe it’s supposed to conjure “Elton” as in Elton John (maybe they should make an Elton John limited-edition model?). The camera won’t have any trouble selling, so I’m sure none of this matters even a little, but this isn’t the first time I’ve questioned name choices by Panasonic’s marketing department. Probably the best example of market-naming was the X-E1, which sounds a little like “sexy one”. Anyway, those are my thoughts. If the Panasonic Elton sounds intriguing to you, consider purchasing it; if not, don’t. If Fujifilm made an X30 successor, I would buy it, and I don’t think they’d have any trouble selling it if they did. Hopefully they will.

A Controversy Undone

Posted on May 31, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

*The Camera Bar* – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Pacific Blues Recipe

Panasonic inadvertently created a controversy (actually, two). You’re probably aware of it already, but for those who aren’t, let me briefly explain it to you. Afterwards, I’ll tie it back into Fujifilm and Fuji X Weekly, and by the end it will all make sense why I’m bringing it up on this blog.

It began when Gerald Undone, a popular YouTuber, posted a video lamenting that Panasonic didn’t invite him to the launch event of the Lumix S9, nor did they send him a preproduction model prior to release. Gerald comes across as unnecessarily bothered for the exclusion; however, he goes on to make some extremely valid points that shouldn’t be dismissed. If you haven’t seen the video, I’d rather you watch it and form your own opinions than to read my commentary on it, so I’ll leave it at that.

What is important to note, though, is that—in Gerald’s view—Panasonic punished him for being critical of one of their products (or, really, using the “wrong” word), and they told him they were excluding him from the S9 launch because they were concerned he wouldn’t like the camera. In his opinion, Panasonic’s content-creator inclusion for the event was largely based on who they felt would tow the company’s line, which casts skepticism (fairly or unfairly) across the viewpoints of those who were invited. Again, you can watch the video and form your own opinions, I’m just trying to lay out the controversy for those who are unaware.

*Bus Ride with Tom Baumgaertel* – New York – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe

Afterwards, people noticed that the camera reviews by those who attended the launch event and/or who had received a preproduction model of the Lumix S9 were largely very positive despite the technical specs and features being surprisingly mediocre. There was an obvious disconnect between the initial reviews and the perception of those who had read the fine details. Did that prove Gerald right?

Important to the controversy is that the Lumix S9, aside from one important aspect, is probably the least interesting full-frame camera released in the last decade (this is my opinion, it’s ok to disagree). Some reviewers—I’m sure at the recommendation of Panasonic—suggested that the S9 is comparable to the Fujifilm X100VI; basically, the S9 is a full-frame interchangeable-lens X100VI alternative. However, the Fujifilm camera that the S9 is most similar to is the X-A5, and not the X100VI. The X-A5 has some advantages (mechanical shutter, hotshoe, grip, size/weight, price, lenses), and the S9 has some advantages (6K video, IBIS, larger dynamic range, better high-ISO, better autofocus); otherwise, those two models are surprisingly similar.

The “important aspect” of the Lumix S9, which is indeed noteworthy, is the ability to wirelessly transfer LUTs (think overlays or presets) from an app to the camera, and apply those to still pictures for straight-out-of-camera photography. Panasonic is trying to create a community around LUTs similar to the Recipe Community for Fujifilm. Interestingly, Panasonic’s slogan for the S9 is: “Shoot. Edit. Share.” It’s a mixed message, for whatever reason; however, Film Simulation Recipes have become so popular for Fujifilm that other brands are trying to figure out how to incorporate something similar, which should not be overlooked or under-appreciated.

*Omar Gonzalez* – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Superia Negative Recipe

Going back to the controversy, there have been a large number of people within the photography world who have commented on a perceived disconnect between what the Lumix S9 actually is and the hype that many YouTubers espoused who were flown to Japan for the launch. The solution suggested by some is to ignore the opinions of those who were given early-access to the S9, and especially to those who attended the launch. But is that fair?

I was recently loaned a preproduction Fujifilm X-T50. I wasn’t invited to the X-Summit launch event in Sydney, but I was flown to a secondary event in New York City. The X-T50 has a contentious design choice that I spoke (mostly) positively about. Do you see a parallel? Was I invited because Fujifilm thought I would hype the camera? Were my opinions influenced by Fujifilm’s generosity towards me? Can Fuji X Weekly still be trusted for unbiased opinions (or at least as unbiased as an unashamed fanboy can get)? I really had to ask myself these questions, and give this whole matter a lot of consideration.

When I arrived in New York, one of the first things I was asked by a Fujifilm representative is what I thought of the new Film Dial. I said that I was unsure about it at first, but once I figured out how to get the most out of it, I really liked it. The representative was surprised, because it was assumed that I wouldn’t like it, since it’s not necessarily designed for use with Recipes.

*Bryan Minear Getting Soaked* – Windham, NY – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe

During the trip—and even before—it was stated several times by Fujifilm that what they wanted most was authenticity—those involved shouldn’t be concerned with what they may believe the company wants; Be true to who you are. I was also told that vulnerability is a virtue they appreciate. Looking back, my impression is that they wanted those in attendance to be at ease, and to not feel pressured to think or feel some certain way, or create some certain things. The point seemed to be more about establishing connections between creative people who happen to use Fujifilm products, and much less about the products themselves.

The question is whether or not I was influenced in some way by Fujifilm. I probably would not have picked up an X-T50 had Fujifilm not sent me one; had I not used it, I probably would not have spoken so positively towards it, because I wouldn’t have discovered how to effectively use it. That seems like an obvious one, to me. Maybe more subtly: I met some of the people behind the brand, and gained insights into some inner workings, which adjusted my perception about the company—essentially, some of my preconceived notions about Fujifilm had to be realigned to match reality. That’s a type of influence that I believe is actually positive. Did I come away thinking that if I speak negatively about the brand, I won’t be invited back? I’d be lying if I told you that it didn’t cross my mind, because it did; however, I don’t believe that is true.

This whole controversy has caused me to pause and self-reflect, and evaluate my own motives and actions. I want authenticity and vulnerability to be the gold standard of this website and myself, personally. I hope that I’m a trustworthy voice in the Fujifilm community—both now, and for years to come. I’m highly appreciative that Fujifilm reached out to me, loaned me a camera, and invited me to their event, and I look forward to any other potential opportunities to work with the brand in the future. If I have to leave my ethics at the door to do so, I’m not ok with that. Thankfully, I don’t believe Fujifilm would ask that of me, but it is important to not be complacent of the potential, and to hold onto my personal values tightly at all times.

Thoughts on the Panasonic Lumix S9

Posted on May 22, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

Panasonic just announced a new camera: Lumix S9. I’ve never touched or seen the Panasonic Lumix S9 in person. I’ve only seen reviews of it, such as the Chris Niccolls writeup on PetaPixel. I have a few quick thoughts that I want to share with you, before returning to the regularly scheduled programming.

Many years ago I used to own a Panasonic camera, but only briefly, because I didn’t care for it. It was one of their low-budget models, so maybe if I had something higher-end I would have liked it better. I’m sure I would think much differently about the S9; however, I don’t have much of a personal interest in the brand. If they ceased making cameras, I probably wouldn’t even notice. The S9 only crossed my radar because I might be the reason that it exists.

*I captured this on a Panasonic in 2016*

The Lumix S9 is specifically intended to appeal to those waiting for a Fujifilm X100VI, but are on a really long waitlist. There’s a vague retro rangefinder styling that might from a distance look similar to the Fujifilm X-E4. It has a 24mp full-frame sensor. More interestingly, it has LUTs, a LUT button, and a LUT app. Panasonic intended this camera for those who want straight-out-of-camera film-like results. We’ll get to that in just a moment.

There are some serious design issues that make the camera a compromise. I think they wanted it to be in a certain size and price point to appeal to potential Fujifilm customers, but they had to strip it down in order to do so. There’s no viewfinder—optical or electronic—which means you’ll have to compose everything on the LCD. That’s ok sometimes—Ricoh GR cameras are that way—but it’s definitely not ideal. There’s no grip—not even a small one—which is ok if the lens is small and lightweight, but not for most of the lenses available for the camera. You won’t find a joystick. Most severely, the S9 doesn’t have a mechanical shutter, so it isn’t a good option for artificial light or quickly moving objects. I don’t like the PASM mode dial, and wish it had retro controls.

*The Fujifilm X-A3 was the X-A5’s predecessor, but quite similar overall*

Like I said, I have not seen or touched the S9 in person, but it seems like a full-frame version of the Fujifilm X-A5; however, it has IBIS, while the X-A5 doesn’t. Still, there are enough similarities that, in my opinion, the X-A5 is the model people should be focusing their comparisons towards, and not the X100VI. Between the X-A5 and the S9, the S9 wins, but you can buy the old Fujifilm for less than $500, while the S9 will cost you $1,500.

Now back to the LUTs, perhaps the defining feature of the Lumix S9. Those who edit videos are probably quite familiar with LUTs; however, it’s not nearly as well-known or well-understood in the still photography world (and it’s not the same as a film simulation, either). LUTs are presets that overlay (preferably flat) videos or images. Let’s say you captured a photograph using the Eterna film simulation with Highlight, Shadow, and Color all set to -4, then later added a filter to that JPEG to add in contrast and color—that’s what a LUT does. The S9 has the ability to store and apply LUTs to both videos and still photographs in-camera.

*Best Burger Shack* – Tannersville, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Pacific Blues Recipe

This isn’t a new feature for Panasonic, but what is new is that the LUTs can now be added to the camera wirelessly via an app (Fujifilm should do this with Recipes). There’s a library of LUTs available on the app, plus you can create your own. A button on the camera activates the on-camera LUT library. This is a bold move by Panasonic, one that takes direct aim at Fujifilm, and is intended to lure potential (or maybe even current) Fujifilm customers. They want a Recipe-like movement for their own brand.

There are a few reasons why, in my opinion, it won’t catch on. First, the S9 is too stripped down to be taken seriously. Sure, people will buy it, but it won’t be a trendy camera. Second, “LUT” is far less imaginative and romantic than “film simulation”—aside from that, Panasonic doesn’t have the vast experience manufacturing analog emulsions like Fujifilm does. Third, creating your own Film Simulation Recipe is far less complicated (but can still be complicated) than creating your own LUT. Fourth, there are more Recipes available for Fujifilm cameras than there are LUTs available for Panasonic.

*Yellow Cab* – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI – Vintage Vibes Recipe

With all of that said, I think it’s great that Panasonic is trying this out. More and more, photographers are relying on camera-made JPEGs, and are editing less and less. I think that’s wonderful! The stigma of “you must shoot RAW; only amateurs use JPEGs” is rightfully melting away. I think it’s only a matter of time before camera companies team up with RNI, Alien Skin, VSCO, etc., and offer film-like presets in-camera. Fujifilm has a film heritage that allowed them to build it from the ground up and achieve convincing results. They’re pioneers and leaders in all this, and now it’s catching on.

However—and I had a conversation with someone about this today—would film simulations be the big deal that they are today if not for Fuji X Weekly and Film Simulation Recipes? Would the Panasonic Lumix S9 exist without this community? Probably not. That’s an incredible honor! It goes to show that there’s something to all this—a rising tide that is affecting all of photography, and not just those with X-series models. It will definitely be interesting to see what happens in the next few years: with Fujifilm, Panansonic, and all the other brands who are sure to try their own take on film simulations and Recipes.