photography opinion

The Fujifilm X half Target Market — Why most get this wrong, and why it matters

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

There’s been a lot of negativity within the community about the new Fujifilm X half camera. A lot of positivity, too, but definitely a lot of gloom. I think it stems from a misunderstanding of who the camera is for. Understanding better the intended market segment might help to make sense of the camera. I think it’s also important to state that just because a particular model is not for you personally, doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t exist—if it becomes commercially successful (which I’m confident it will be), that is a strong argument that it should indeed exist because it obviously filled a market void, but maybe just not the particular void affecting you. It’s certainly ok to express your opinions about it, but preferably in a kind and constructive way. Not everything I said was positive because in all honesty, not everything about it is roses and rainbows; however, that doesn’t mean the camera is junk. With that out of the way, let’s get into this.

So who is the Fujifilm X half for? In my opinion, there are several primary groups. And just because someone doesn’t fit any of those groups, that doesn’t mean they won’t buy or appreciate the camera. I think this is a polarizing model that is definitely not for everyone, or even for most people. Some of you will love it, some of you will hate it, and that’s ok. This camera isn’t for everyone who regularly reads this website. In fact, the target audience most likely has never heard of Fuji X Weekly, or is maybe only vaguely familiar (but probably not).

One group is those who have recently discovered the joys of film photography, particularly those who have purchased the Pentax 17 or Kodak H35N—but not exclusively those people. Some have a 35mm point-and-shoot from the ’90’s. Some have been using Fujifilm Quicksnap disposable cameras. Film photography has seen a significant resurgence from the younger generation; however, it’s been hindered by the high cost of film and development, and sometimes the lack of availability. A camera that provides a similar experience and even aesthetic, but with the convenience of digital and with a one-time-fee entry point will be appealing to some of these people.

Another group is the digicam lovers. Surprisingly, the number one digital camera brand in Japan in 2024 was Kodak (actually, JK Imaging using the Kodak brand name). They’re selling a ton of cheap digicams that are basically 15-year-old tech and designs. Nobody in the camera world takes this seriously, but it is a sizable demographic. Retro digicams from 15 or 20 years ago are all the rage right now, too. The X half offers a graduation of sorts for those looking for a more premium option.

A third group is Instax users. Instax is the camera division’s money maker much more than the X-series is. Instant film photography is big and has been for awhile, and Fujifilm is king of the hill. At some point one can outgrow Instax; the Evo series is supposed to help with that, but it’s not a big step. So how can Fujifilm convince Instax photographers to take the leap into the X-series world? With a digital camera that offers a simple and analog-like experience with some Instax compatibility, of course!

In my opinion, those are the three main groups. That’s a pretty large umbrella, and you only need a small portion from each to sell a lot of copies. If you are not in one of those groups, you may still find the camera appealing, and might buy and love it (I might be one of those people); however, you’re not necessarily the target market for the X half. What’s fascinating—genius, really—is that this is a potential stepping stone into the system from the bottom. There’s always a lot of discussions about market share, and convincing those from other brands to join the fold. This camera is intended to bring in outsiders, and grow the brand unconventionally yet organically. Then, later, some of these people will buy an X-M5, X-T50, X100VI, etc., as their second X-series camera. I bet thousands get into the system this way.

Unfortunately, some of those who aren’t the target market have been trashing the camera online (not on this website, but elsewhere), and—much worse—speaking harshly of those who might buy it. My estimation is that the majority of sales will come from first-time Fujifilm photographers. I think it will sell fairly well to the existing X-series customer base because it’s a fun concept, but primarily it’s going to be someone’s first dip into the X-series pool. Instead of degrading these folks for liking and buying the camera, we should gladly welcome them into the community. If they have a good experience, they may just stick around for awhile, and that’s a very good thing for the brand and photography in-general. I think we need to be more welcoming and accepting of these newcomers, and not criticize them for making the purchase. I don’t think anyone here is doing that, but I’ve definitely seen it elsewhere, and it’s not healthy. It’s ok if this camera isn’t for you, but it is certainly for someone, and they’re going to absolutely love it.

Do You Care that Adobe is Spying on Your Pictures?

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

I Spy with my Little Eye – Laguna Beach, CA – Fujifilm X-T5 – Fujicolor Reala 100

There’s an Adobe controversy that seemingly everyone’s talking about. I have probably a unique take on it, and I want to share that with you in this article. If you’re interested, read on; otherwise, this is probably a post that’s ok to skip.

I don’t want to spend too much time rehashing what has already been said about it, but for those who don’t know… Adobe—the makers of Photoshop, Lightroom, and a number of other software programs—has been ticking off their customers for some time now. They’re constantly doing something that makes their customers unhappy—but, apparently, not unhappy enough to actually matter. Adobe is the long-time reigning king of photo and video editing software (at least by subscription sales…), and their closest competitors are pretty far in the distance. Adobe is not worried in the slightest about any controversy they’ve stepped into. They can be brazen in their controversies and it doesn’t bother them even a little. They have a lot to gain and very little to lose (or so they think). They can even spy on your pictures, and you’re not going to do a darn thing about it.

That’s the current controversy. Adobe has updated their terms of service, which allows them to potentially look at your pictures—presumably only if you are utilizing their cloud service and/or AI technologies; however, they haven’t fully clarified that, which certainly casts some doubt to a limited use scenario. If you’re not being forthcoming, people are going to assume all sorts of things, especially if you have a history of deception. For example, nobody had a clue that Adobe was using their pictures (via Adobe Stock) to train their AI; when it came out, Adobe pointed out it was in the terms of service, and everyone was like, “I don’t remember agreeing to that, and I wouldn’t have if I had known.” But how can you argue? You agreed. Is it Adobe’s fault that you didn’t read the lengthy terms of service written in a legal language that only an attorney could fully understand? No, it’s your fault, because you agreed, even though you had no idea what you were agreeing to. It was buried in there somewhere, apparently, that Adobe could legally use your pictures to eventually put you out of business.

A photo from 2015, back when I still post-processed RAW files. A little over-edited; nevertheless, this picture hangs on a wall in my house.

If you want to learn more about the controversy, PetaPixel has a few articles (here, here, and here). Tony Northrup has a video. Even Fujirumors has a post. There are a thousand more, I’m sure, that you can find and read. It’s a big story, but it won’t make any difference, unless this is the straw that breaks the camel’s back. Unless their customers have finally had enough and have a mass exodus. Otherwise, we’ll all forget about this rather quickly, and (as usual) it will be a complete nonissue.

The fact is that most apps are spying on you. Data is money right now. Big money. It’s a multi-billion-dollar-a-year industry. The more that is known about you, the easier it is to control how you think and behave and (most important to companies) to sell you crap that you probably don’t need and otherwise wouldn’t have purchased. Adobe is spying on you for the same reasons why Google, Apple, Meta, Yahoo, etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., are spying on you. There’s a lot of money to be made from knowing more about you, and there’s a lot of money for that data. They will tell you that it’s innocent: to improve customer service or improve their products or for legal or training purposes— something like that—but in reality it’s about the money that they can make from doing it. Your money, btw—it’s about how they can get their hands on your money more easily. And it’s not just your money; they don’t actually care where the cash comes from—for example, Adobe’s AI ultimately isn’t about getting more money from photographers, but eventually the money that might otherwise go to photographers; they’re going to cut out the middleman (that’s you).

I know all of this because, technically speaking, I’m an app developer, and I’ve learned this stuff while developing apps and researching topics related to it. My apps don’t spy on anyone for any reason. I collect zero data with my apps, not even user names or email addresses. There are plenty of people who would say it’s not smart to do that—everyone else is doing it, and making a lot of money in the process. Why shouldn’t I? But I value your privacy, because I value my own privacy. Treat others how you wish to be treated, right? That’s the Golden Rule, which used to mean something. Maybe I’m naive, but I think the world would be better if more people followed that principal. Unfortunately, most apps don’t follow that rule, and you’re being spied on a lot more than you likely realize.

Smile! You’re on Camera – Vulture City, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Fujicolor Natura 1600

Going back to Adobe, I haven’t used their products for a long time now. A lot of Fujifilm photographers use Capture One instead of Lightroom because of how it handles X-Trans files. Nowadays—and for a handful of years now—I shoot JPEGs, and don’t edit, other than cropping/straightening and maybe a minor adjustment occasionally. I use Film Simulation Recipes, and get the look I want straight-out-of-camera, unedited. I have no need for Photoshop or Lightroom or even a competitor’s version of those programs. Personally, I don’t really care what Adobe does or doesn’t do, because I have no skin in the game, so to speak. Every person’s needs are different, but I bet that a lot of you reading this probably don’t need Adobe’s software, either, and could cancel your subscription (if you have one) without any negative impact whatsoever on your photography. If you’ve been on the fence about cancelling your Adobe subscription, perhaps now is a good time.

Even though Adobe owns the primary programs that many photographers use, if you are not happy with them, why continually give them your money? There are alternative software options, and alternative approaches, that make Adobe unnecessary for almost everyone. For me, it’s Film Simulation Recipes and JPEGs. For you, maybe it’s Capture One or some other program. I don’t want to suggest what might be the best choice for you, as we’re all different. Maybe you actually really do need Adobe; if that’s you, I hope you don’t mind being spied on by them, because they might just be doing that.

Anyway, this will all blow over really quickly, and two weeks from now probably no one will even be talking about it or concerned in the least about Adobe possibly spying on their pictures. So none of this actually matters. But if it does matter to you, just know there are indeed other options, and some might even be closer to you and easier for you than you realize.

A Controversy Undone

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

The Camera Bar – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Pacific Blues Recipe

Panasonic inadvertently created a controversy (actually, two). You’re probably aware of it already, but for those who aren’t, let me briefly explain it to you. Afterwards, I’ll tie it back into Fujifilm and Fuji X Weekly, and by the end it will all make sense why I’m bringing it up on this blog.

It began when Gerald Undone, a popular YouTuber, posted a video lamenting that Panasonic didn’t invite him to the launch event of the Lumix S9, nor did they send him a preproduction model prior to release. Gerald comes across as unnecessarily bothered for the exclusion; however, he goes on to make some extremely valid points that shouldn’t be dismissed. If you haven’t seen the video, I’d rather you watch it and form your own opinions than to read my commentary on it, so I’ll leave it at that.

What is important to note, though, is that—in Gerald’s view—Panasonic punished him for being critical of one of their products (or, really, using the “wrong” word), and they told him they were excluding him from the S9 launch because they were concerned he wouldn’t like the camera. In his opinion, Panasonic’s content-creator inclusion for the event was largely based on who they felt would tow the company’s line, which casts skepticism (fairly or unfairly) across the viewpoints of those who were invited. Again, you can watch the video and form your own opinions, I’m just trying to lay out the controversy for those who are unaware.

Bus Ride with Tom Baumgaertel – New York – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe

Afterwards, people noticed that the camera reviews by those who attended the launch event and/or who had received a preproduction model of the Lumix S9 were largely very positive despite the technical specs and features being surprisingly mediocre. There was an obvious disconnect between the initial reviews and the perception of those who had read the fine details. Did that prove Gerald right?

Important to the controversy is that the Lumix S9, aside from one important aspect, is probably the least interesting full-frame camera released in the last decade (this is my opinion, it’s ok to disagree). Some reviewers—I’m sure at the recommendation of Panasonic—suggested that the S9 is comparable to the Fujifilm X100VI; basically, the S9 is a full-frame interchangeable-lens X100VI alternative. However, the Fujifilm camera that the S9 is most similar to is the X-A5, and not the X100VI. The X-A5 has some advantages (mechanical shutter, hotshoe, grip, size/weight, price, lenses), and the S9 has some advantages (6K video, IBIS, larger dynamic range, better high-ISO, better autofocus); otherwise, those two models are surprisingly similar.

The “important aspect” of the Lumix S9, which is indeed noteworthy, is the ability to wirelessly transfer LUTs (think overlays or presets) from an app to the camera, and apply those to still pictures for straight-out-of-camera photography. Panasonic is trying to create a community around LUTs similar to the Recipe Community for Fujifilm. Interestingly, Panasonic’s slogan for the S9 is: “Shoot. Edit. Share.” It’s a mixed message, for whatever reason; however, Film Simulation Recipes have become so popular for Fujifilm that other brands are trying to figure out how to incorporate something similar, which should not be overlooked or under-appreciated.

Omar Gonzalez – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Superia Negative Recipe

Going back to the controversy, there have been a large number of people within the photography world who have commented on a perceived disconnect between what the Lumix S9 actually is and the hype that many YouTubers espoused who were flown to Japan for the launch. The solution suggested by some is to ignore the opinions of those who were given early-access to the S9, and especially to those who attended the launch. But is that fair?

I was recently loaned a preproduction Fujifilm X-T50. I wasn’t invited to the X-Summit launch event in Sydney, but I was flown to a secondary event in New York City. The X-T50 has a contentious design choice that I spoke (mostly) positively about. Do you see a parallel? Was I invited because Fujifilm thought I would hype the camera? Were my opinions influenced by Fujifilm’s generosity towards me? Can Fuji X Weekly still be trusted for unbiased opinions (or at least as unbiased as an unashamed fanboy can get)? I really had to ask myself these questions, and give this whole matter a lot of consideration.

When I arrived in New York, one of the first things I was asked by a Fujifilm representative is what I thought of the new Film Dial. I said that I was unsure about it at first, but once I figured out how to get the most out of it, I really liked it. The representative was surprised, because it was assumed that I wouldn’t like it, since it’s not necessarily designed for use with Recipes.

Bryan Minear Getting Soaked – Windham, NY – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe

During the trip—and even before—it was stated several times by Fujifilm that what they wanted most was authenticity—those involved shouldn’t be concerned with what they may believe the company wants; Be true to who you are. I was also told that vulnerability is a virtue they appreciate. Looking back, my impression is that they wanted those in attendance to be at ease, and to not feel pressured to think or feel some certain way, or create some certain things. The point seemed to be more about establishing connections between creative people who happen to use Fujifilm products, and much less about the products themselves.

The question is whether or not I was influenced in some way by Fujifilm. I probably would not have picked up an X-T50 had Fujifilm not sent me one; had I not used it, I probably would not have spoken so positively towards it, because I wouldn’t have discovered how to effectively use it. That seems like an obvious one, to me. Maybe more subtly: I met some of the people behind the brand, and gained insights into some inner workings, which adjusted my perception about the company—essentially, some of my preconceived notions about Fujifilm had to be realigned to match reality. That’s a type of influence that I believe is actually positive. Did I come away thinking that if I speak negatively about the brand, I won’t be invited back? I’d be lying if I told you that it didn’t cross my mind, because it did; however, I don’t believe that is true.

This whole controversy has caused me to pause and self-reflect, and evaluate my own motives and actions. I want authenticity and vulnerability to be the gold standard of this website and myself, personally. I hope that I’m a trustworthy voice in the Fujifilm community—both now, and for years to come. I’m highly appreciative that Fujifilm reached out to me, loaned me a camera, and invited me to their event, and I look forward to any other potential opportunities to work with the brand in the future. If I have to leave my ethics at the door to do so, I’m not ok with that. Thankfully, I don’t believe Fujifilm would ask that of me, but it is important to not be complacent of the potential, and to hold onto my personal values tightly at all times.

Is Fujifilm Losing Its Soul?

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

After the announcement of the Fujifilm X-H2S, which has a PASM dial instead of the traditional dials of the X-H1, many people asked, “Is Fujifilm losing its soul?” I’ve had a number of Fujifilm photographers tell me that they believe so, and some have inquired if I believe so, too. What’s my opinion? Is Fujifilm indeed losing its soul?

Fujifilm has already lost its soul. It’s done gone. Elvis left the building awhile ago. The design decisions during development of the X-H2S are simply the manifestation of that lost soul.

What was this “soul” that Fujifilm lost? How can a company even have a soul?

A whole book could be written on this topic, but to summarize in a short sentence, Fujifilm’s philosophy for their X-series cameras was analog-inspired innovations with a focus on the photographer’s experience (both while using the camera for photography, and as customers of the brand). This was their soul. That philosophy, which seemed to be clearly understood, is what drove the camera department of the company (remember, Fujifilm’s main business is not photography nowadays). From the design decisions to the Kaizen firmware updates and everything in-between, this philosophy oozed out—it was both obvious and attractive, and is why Fujifilm was suddenly successful, quickly overtaking other brands, including iconic Nikon.

Fujifilm didn’t need to have a photography department at all, but they decided that, even if it was a bust, they’d still fund it and keep it going, because photography had been such an important part of their company’s heritage, and had been an important aspect of Japanese culture. They were merely the caretakers of this thing that was bigger than themselves. That’s how they looked at it, anyway, and it was noticeable and refreshing.

Somewhere along the line, however, Fujifilm began to view this differently. The photography division needed to be built bigger. It must grow. It must become more profitable. It must gain more marketshare. It must become as big as—or bigger than—Canon and Sony. I think there are actually two competing sides within Fujifilm (and maybe this battle has been taking place for awhile now): one is profit-first driven, and the other is nurture-first driven. The side I would like to see win is the latter, but the side that seems to be winning is the former.

Where this lost-soul has most obviously manifested itself is Kaizen, or the lack of it. This is a word that I hadn’t heard of until I owned a Fujifilm camera. It’s something that attracted a lot of people to the brand. It means continuous improvement—making something better over time, even though it was already purchased. Why? Part of it is duty (what you are supposed to do), and another part of it is that it creates loyalty, because it shows the customer that you care about them, and not just their money. That care will cause the customer to overlook shortcomings, because the caring is more important to them in the whole scheme of things. And long-term loyalty is more valuable to the company than short-term gains. I don’t know the exact timeline of when Fujifilm stopped caring (or, more accurately, began caring less about their customers in favor of caring more about profits), but it seems to be during the development of X-Trans IV. That’s when the profit-first people seemed to first get an upper hand on the nurture-first people. I don’t know for sure, though. What I am confident in is that, as X-Trans V rolls out, the profit-first philosophy is the current mantra of Fujifilm’s photography division—it’s Fujifilm’s current soul, unfortunately.

Am I overreacting? After all, the X-H2S is just one camera, right? There are two points that I’d like to make. First, Fujifilm removed the traditional dials on the X-H line in favor of PASM. For Fujifilm, PASM cameras are intended to attract new customers who are not interested in or are otherwise intimated by the traditional controls of their other X models. They don’t put PASM on cameras that they intend to market to their current customer base. The X-H2S is their top-of-the-line “flagship” model, the first X-Trans V… and it’s not for you. It was never intended for you. Screw you! It’s for them. Those guys with their Sonys and Canons, that’s who it’s for. We give our best to them. Our current customers who have been so loyal over the years will have to be happy with the crumbs that fall from the table. Second, X-Trans V is rolling out, while the X-T3 (their all-time top-selling model) and X-T30 are still on an island, and the X-Pro3 and X100V (premium models) don’t have as good of JPEG features as the X-S10, X-E4, and X-T30 II (mid or lower tier models). That’s shameful, in my opinion. Take care of your current customers first before working so hard to bring in new customers. Fujifilm is making their customer base less loyal, which will only hurt them in the long run. Nurture first.

If you build it, they will come. Fujifilm built it and they came; however, not enough for the profit-first people. They want more, but they’re barking up the wrong tree. Instead of becoming Sony in order to attract current Sony users who are unhappy with their gear (how does this makes sense to anyone?), Fujifilm should double-down on what makes them unique. What’s special about Fujifilm? Analog-inspired innovation and the photographer’s experience—that’s what’s special, or at least it used to be. There’s one other thing that’s unique, and that’s community. Fujifilm didn’t build it—instead it was built around them; however, they have not done nearly enough to embrace it and engage it. In fact, at times they’ve been standoffish to it. That needs to end, because community is Fujifilm’s greatest asset, yet they seem unsure of how to engage it, so they do so halfheartedly and from a “safe” distance.

I didn’t mean to write a negative article. When I sat down at the computer, I had no intention of typing out this post; however, it’s something that has been circling inside my mind for a few weeks now, so I suppose that it was inevitable. I really hope that it doesn’t make you feel angry towards Fujifilm. This article’s aim is to, on the off chance that this is actually read by Fujifilm, inspire reflection and perhaps even change, and secondarily put into words something that maybe you have felt but weren’t sure how to express. Perhaps this is somehow therapeutic. For me it feels good to say, even though it is negative, and I hope that getting it out in the open will somehow produce something positive.

What Future Camera Technology Might Be Like

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Barn by the Tetons – Grand Teton NP, WY – Fujifilm X-E1 – Nik Silver Efex edit

What will future cameras be like? More specifically, what do I think they’ll be like? This is an odd topic that has come up a few times recently in various places. I don’t have any inside information. I’ve never laid eyes on any top-secret still-in-development cameras. I only have my own ideas and opinions, which are probably inaccurate. I’ve certainly been wrong before, and I’m probably wrong now. Still, it’s fun to speculate.

I think, in the not-too-distant future, perhaps beginning in roughly five years, we’ll see camera manufacturers team up with software companies to offer more (and better) in-camera filters. We’re going to see more software built into cameras, and with that, I think we’ll start to see VSCO, RNI, Alien Skin, Nik Collection, and others, partner with camera manufacturers to include their popular presets integrated into gear. This will also allow RAW files to match straight-out-of-camera JPEGs (and TIFFs) simply by applying the same preset in-software as in-camera.

Mirrored Mountain – Mirror Lake, UT – Fujifilm X-E1 – Alien Skin Exposure edit

The Zeiss ZX1 camera has Lightroom Mobile built-in. The Pixii camera can be programmed with LUT profiles. It’s not even close to mainstream yet, but you can see the very beginning of this shift start to build. I think it is only a matter of time before you will be able to capture in-camera with (for example) the RNI Kodak Gold v.3 preset. I don’t think Canon, Sony, Nikon, or Fujifilm will be the first company to do this. Maybe Leica. Perhaps a future Panasonic S-series model. I’m not exactly sure, but it will definitely be a marketing strategy for whoever does it first.

I believe that in the beginning it will be collaborations between specific manufactures and software companies. For example, Sony might partner with VSCO, and perhaps Nikon partners with RNI. I personally hope Fujifilm partners with RNI or Alien Skin, but my guess is that Fujifilm will hold onto their film simulations, which, let’s be honest, is a similar concept. Film simulations are kind of like presets, especially since they can be customized with film simulation recipes; however, in its current state film simulations don’t go as far as what I believe is coming. I do think Fujifilm can accomplish in-house their own presets, since they do seem to have a nice head start, but I don’t know if they have the foresight to take it far enough or the R&D resources to keep up once it takes off. We’ll have to wait and see how it all plays out. Currently, Fujifilm’s Film Simulations, with the help of custom JPEG recipes, are the closest thing right now to what I believe is coming.

Eventually I see it morphing into more of an app model, where you can buy any company’s presets and use them on your camera, no matter the brand. Buy a Canon and download the RNI app if you want their presets, or VSCO if you want theirs. If you have a Fujifilm camera, you can use the exact same presets on that camera as you can on your Sony. This might be 10 or more years down the road, but it seems like it is inevitable that it will happen someday.

Whitefish Lake Infrared – Whitefish, MT – Fujifilm X100V – RNI Aero edit

Why do I think all this is the future of photography technology? What I believe is going to happen is a stronger movement towards straight-out-of-camera. Not for bragging rights, but for three reasons: 1) it saves so much time, 2) it can be more fun, and 3) it opens up photography more to those who don’t have the desire, skills, or time to post-process their pictures. Technology will make getting post-processed-like-looks more accessible without the need to actually do it. It’s going to be easier and more automatic. You, the photographer, will have to select which look you want, and the camera will do the work for you and will deliver to you out-of-camera that look without any need for Lightroom, etc., to achieve it. Upload the picture to whatever social media or cloud storage you want right from the camera. No need for a computer, as it’s all handled by the camera. You won’t even need your phone, unless camera companies figure out that they can harness the phone’s computing power to do the work for them, and the phone becomes (wirelessly) integrated into the camera.

I could be completely wrong about all of this. I’ve certainly been wrong many times before. Nobody knows the future. I do see things moving in this direction, and in a very small way, because of my film simulation recipes, I’ve had a hand in moving it.

Sentinel & Merced – Yosemite NP, CA – Fujifilm X100V – SOOC “Vintage Color” unedited