camera gear

Grading Fujifilm Releases in 2025

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

I’m going to rate Fujifilm’s class of 2025 gear releases. I’ve never done something like this before. I’ve seen plenty of other people do end-of-the-year camera gear grading, which I sometimes agree with and sometimes don’t. Since 2025 is nearly over, I thought I’d try my hand at grading all the cameras and lenses that Fujifilm’s released over the last 12 months.

Specifically, there were five cameras—two GFX and three X-series (one is only sort-of X-series)—and three lenses, one of which is a GFX cinema lens. That’s eight items in total. For the sake of this article, I’m excluding Instax. Let’s dive in!

Cameras

Fujifilm released five cameras in 2025: three X-series and two GFX models. We’ll grade each camera individually, then each series as a whole, and finally grade all of the cameras as a group.

First up is the Fujifilm GFX100RF. This is a medium-format fixed-lens compact camera, and best thought of as the GFX equivalent of the Fujifilm X70. It’s the smallest, lightest, and cheapest medium format camera-lens combo from any brand. It’s the only retro-styled GFX camera currently being made, and only the second ever (the long-discontinued GFX 50R is the other). This camera is high on my bucket list, and I hope to someday purchase it, but at $5,600 it’s well outside of my current budget.

Common complaints about the GFX100RF are that 1) it lacks IBIS, 2) it has a maximum aperture of “only” f/4, and 3) it’s not fully weather-sealed (an adapter and filter are required to fully seal it). I’m perfectly ok with point three—it’s no problem for the X100-series, and it shouldn’t be seen as an issue for the GFX100RF. As far as points one and two, Fujifilm has said that the camera would need to be significantly larger and heavier to accommodate either of those, and especially both. Interestingly enough, the medium-format camera-lens combo that’s closest in size and weight to the GFX100RF (the Hasselblad 907X plus CFV 100C back with the 28mm lens) also lacks IBIS and has a maximum aperture of f/4 (but is much, much more expensive than the GFX). Fujifilm could certainly make a larger, heavier, and more expensive camera that’s similar in concept (just like they made both an X70 and an X100T), and I hope they someday do. Anyway, the GFX100RF deserves a very high grade, so I give it an A+.

Next is the Fujifilm X half, which is currently the smallest X-series camera; however, it’s not X-Trans. It’s a compact fixed-lens model with a vertically mounted 1″ sensor. Sitting in-between an Instax Evo and the X-M5, it’s intended to deliver an analog-like experience in a simple package. The designers took inspiration from half-frame 35mm cameras. The X half is a ton of fun, and great for snapshots of family vacations and things like that. I enjoy using it, and so does my wife.

Common complaints are that 1) it’s too expensive for what it is, 2) it has some flaws like the lack of a proper flash or hotshoe, and 3) it’s a gimmicky concept. I agree with point one, as the camera should be around $650-$700 in my opinion. I also agree with point two, and I hope those are addressed in a future iteration. As far as point three, I think it’s not really intended for the majority of people who typically buy X-series gear. Fujifilm had in mind a bridge between Instax and the X-series, a pathway for Instax customers to move up (remember, Instax is much larger than the X-series and GFX combined). From what I’ve seen, it seems to be successful in this regard, so, even though the usual crowd might bemoan it, the camera is largely a hit with those whom it was made for. I grade the X half a B-.

Third is the Fujifilm X-E5, which is the closest you’re likely to get to an interchangeable-lens X100VI. This camera is a much different model than its predecessor. The X-E4 was a minimalist low-budget model, serving as Fujifilm’s smallest, lightest, and cheapest camera with an EVF. Inexplicably, Fujifilm discontinued it when it was in high-demand, with months-long waitlists. The X-E5 is the long awaited successor; however, Fujifilm gave it many notable upgrades, and the camera is no longer minimalist or entry-level.

Common complaints are that 1) it’s so much more expensive than the X-E4 and 2) the EVF should have received an upgrade. For point one, the X-E4 was the cheapest (both in price and quality) of any X-E series model, while the X-E5 is the most premium iteration, so it stands to reason that it would be significantly more expensive. I agree with point two; however, it’s not a major issue whatsoever in practical use, only a minor point. My biggest complaint is that Classic Negative was left off the Film Dial, which is inexcusable. The X-E5 is one of my favorite cameras, and I give it an A.

Fourth is the GFX Eterna 55 cinema camera. I’ve seen it in person, I’ve talked to a couple of people who have personally used it. From what I understand, it’s not perfect, but it will likely be highly appreciated by certain segments of the professional cinema crowd. At some point in the coming few years, a major motion picture will be recorded using the Eterna 55, I’m certain. It’s Fujifilm’s most expensive model, but it’s reasonably priced for the segment that it’s in. I give the Eterna 55 an A-.

Last but not least is the Fujifilm X-T30 III, a mild refresh to the X-T30 II, which was a mild refresh to the Fujifilm X-T30, released in early 2019. It fills an important role in the X-series lineup, which is an affordable interchangeable-lens model with an EVF. While it doesn’t have all the bells-and-whistles of the more expensive models, it is very capable, and is the overall best value within the X-series. Fujifilm will sell a whole lot of X-T30 III cameras. I grade it a B+.

Now, to the overall grades, beginning with the X-series. To recap, I gave the X half a B-, the X-E5 an A, and the X-T30 III a B+, which puts the overall grade for the 2025 X-series releases as a B+. Now, to GFX. To recap, I gave the GFX100RF an A+ and the Eterna 55 an A-, which puts the overall grade as an A. That puts the total grade for both the X and GFX lines combined at an A-.

Lenses

Fujifilm only released three lenses in 2025: two X-series and one GFX. I’m not going to spend nearly as much time on this as I did the cameras. I’m going to grade each lens, and then give one overall grade for all the lenses.

First is the Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 pancake. I’ve long advocated for more pancake lenses for the X-series. The 27mm f/2.8 is one of my favorites, while the 18mm f/2 is barely a pancake, and is need of a refresh. The 23mm f/2.8 pancake has been long requested, adds a solid third pancake option for the X-series, and is a great performer; however, the 23mm focal-length is now a bit crowded with several options. That’s really the only complaint, if there is one. I grade this lens an A-.

Next up is the Fujinon XC 13-33mm f/3.5-5.6 kit zoom. I prefer primes, personally. This lens is the smallest X-series zoom, and the closest Fujifilm has to a pancake zoom, but I’m not excited about it in the least. I’m sure it’s good, and some people will really love it. I give it a C.

Lastly, we have the GF 32-90mm cinema lens. If I’m not mistaken, this is the first and currently only GFX lens offered by Fujifilm specifically for filmmaking. Unsurprisingly, this is the most expensive lens for GFX cameras. I don’t know much about it, but the little I have heard has been very positive. This rating is more of a shot in the dark, but I’ll give it an A.

To recap, I gave the Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 pancake an A-, the Fujinon XC 13-33mm zoom a C, and the GF 32-90mm cinema lens an A. Between the three, the overall grade is B+.

Conclusion

It’s also important to consider if the gear that Fujifilm released is the gear they should have released. Did they do enough? Did they introduce the wrong things? We should take that into consideration.

The largest hole is the very-long-overdue X-Pro3 successor, which probably should have come in 2023 or 2024; it’s the end of 2025, and we haven’t seen it yet. My guess is that it will arrive next year, probably within a few months, but that’s only a guess. I get that they might wait for it to be extra special, and perhaps it will be well worth the wait, but I do think some points need to be deducted for its continued absence. Fujifilm should make this camera their top priority for 2026.

The lens lineup has matured over the years, so it makes sense that they might release fewer and fewer new options each year, but there are still a few holes that I’d like to see them fill. Between X and GFX, four or five new or updated lenses each year is probably a better number than just three. I’m a big fan of one of their 2025 lenses, but overall it was a ho-hum year for glass, mostly because the class was so small.

I gave the cameras an A- and the lenses a B+. When factoring in the lack of an X-Pro and the small number of lenses introduced, overall I have to give Fujifilm a grade of B for the gear they released in 2025. Do you agree or disagree? What grade would you give Fujifilm for their class of 2025 gear? Let me know in the comments!

The Best Fujifilm Camera to Gift this Year

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

At this time of year, I typically get asked which Fujifilm cameras are the best to gift to someone. It’s usually like, “I want to give my spouse a new camera, but I don’t know which one.” Or, “This will be my kid’s first real camera.” Or, “He has everything, so I’m really unsure.” The future recipient of the gift is usually a spouse, child, parent, or close friend. Sometimes they’re very experienced photographers, sometimes they’re complete novices. Budgets can also vary wildly.

It’s difficult to give good advice, since every situation is different, but I do make an attempt to give what I hope is helpful suggestions. For example, last year I published Your Gift Guide for Affordable Fujifilm Gear, which was intended to help those looking for secondhand options that are fairly affordable but still excellent. That article is just as valid this year as last, so you might still find it useful.

For 2025, I have one suggestion that I think will apply to almost everyone. No matter if you are buying for your spouse, child, parent, or friend. No matter if they are a seasoned photographer or brand-new. No matter if they have everything already or no camera equipment at all. This is something that I know most would love to receive. And it’s on sale right now.

Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half

The gear that I recommend as a gift is the Fujifilm X half. This is a super fun pocket point-and-shoot that makes unique photos instantly. It’s easy enough that anyone—even a young child—can use it, so no worries if the recipient is a novice; it’s enjoyable enough that even those with high-end expensive gear will choose to use it occasionally. I own this camera, and both my wife and I appreciate it. No matter who you are, this is a camera that people will love to find underneath the Christmas tree.

The Fujifilm X half is perfect for travel snapshots, family events, and documenting everyday moments. It’s small and lightweight, so it’s easy to have with you. It’s simply to use. It delivers film-like results, and can even give a film-like shooting experience. It’s a very unique camera that’s so much fun to use. Last summer the X half was my most-used camera while on a long RV roadtrip up the east coast.

The primary criticism of the camera has been the price, which is a bit high for what it is. I said in my review that the camera should be $650-$700, and not $850. Well, right now and until December 28th, the Fujifilm X half is $200 off in America, which places it at a more affordable and reasonable $650. That’s almost 25% off! So, if you’re seeking out a Fujifilm camera to gift someone, the X half is my top recommendation for 2025.

Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X half in black:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in charcoal:
Amazon, B&H

Is the X Half the Worst Fujifilm-Related Product of 2025?

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujirumors recently conducted a survey of the “best” and “worst” Fujifilm-related gear released in 2025. This included Fujifilm cameras—specifically, the X-E5, X-T30 III, X half, GFX100RF, and GFX Eterna 55—as well as lenses, including third-party lenses. Instax was in the list, too. The survey had two questions: which was the best, and which was the worst. The insinuation in the body of the article was that whatever product was chosen as the “worst” would be considered a flop.

No surprise to me, the Fujifilm X-E5 was ranked as the “best” Fujifilm-related product of 2025, receiving nearly 40% of the votes. It’s an excellent camera that’s been pretty well received. A strong argument can be made that the GFX100RF or Eterna 55 are technically the best, but the majority of those voting are likely not in the GFX system. The X-T30 III will probably end up selling more copies than any of the other cameras, which doesn’t necessarily make it the “best” only the best selling due to having the best value. It’s all subjective.

Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half

The Fujifilm X half far and away received the most votes for “worst” Fujifilm-related product, receiving 50% of the responses. I’m not surprised because the survey was on Fujirumors, and the X half is largely not intended for the market that audience generally is. Just like I’d be shocked if the Instax Mini LiPlay won best product on that site, while it wouldn’t be shocking at all if it did so on an Instax-centric website.

The primary customers of the X half are not those in X-series; it’s those with an Instax camera, those who shoot film on a retro point-and-shoot, those who like digicams, and those who have an interest in photography but have no interest in using a mirrorless or DSLR model. They want film-like results without fuss. I would bet that two-thirds of those who have bought an X half don’t own and have never owned an X-series camera, aside from their new X half. If we were to revisit this in a couple of years, I would wager that the X half was the gateway into the X-series for thousands of people, which is exactly what the purpose of that camera is. Someone buys the X half today, next year they buy an X-T30 III or X100VI or something like that.

Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half

The question, of course, is this: does that make the X half the worst Fujifilm-related product of 2025? If it’s successful at bringing in new customers, particularly an often overlook subset of potential customers, isn’t that good? I don’t know exactly how well the X half is or isn’t selling, especially since those statistics are hard to come by. Apparently, it was the number one selling camera in Japan over the summer, significantly outselling the second most popular. After talking with a few different camera stores, it seems to be doing well, but the camera is not nearly as hot as the X100VI or even the X-E5. I hear that it’s more popular in Asian markets than in Europe or America, so maybe that explains it.

I can tell you this: I have an X half, and it was my most-used camera on an RV roadtrip up the Atlantic coast over the summer. It’s fun for casual snapshots, and was perfect for documenting our journey. My wife and I both use it, and sometimes we fight over it. With that said, it will never replace my X-T5 or X-E5 or X100VI or any other model. It’s not that type of camera. It’s going to give you the “worst” image quality of any current X-series model, but in the best way possible. So maybe it is the worst Fujifilm-related product, but that’s what makes it great. And it’s definitely not a flop, it’s just intended for a different group of people than the usual suspects, which certainly can be a great way to expand market share.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X half in black:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in charcoal:
Amazon, B&H

New: Fujifilm X-T30 III & Fujinon XC 13-33mm lens

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Last night Fujifilm announced the brand-new X-T30 III camera and Fujinon XC 13-33mm f/3.5-6.3 lens. That’s a lot of threes! I’m not going to spend much time talking about either of these products, but I did want to briefly mention their existence.

The X-T30 III is almost identical to the X-T30 II, which was pretty much identical to the X-T30, launched in early 2019. The big changes for the third iteration are: X-Processor 5 and Film Dial. All of the other changes are directly related to those two.

X-Processor 5 brings with it more computing power and more efficient processing, which allows for autofocus and video improvements (including 6K Open Gate), as well as the Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace Film Simulations. Probably better battery life, too. The Film Dial replaces the Drive Dial, which has now been relocated to a button on the back, similar to the Fujifilm X-E5, X100VI, and X-Pro3. Some people are greatly offended by this, but the Drive button has worked quite sufficiently on those popular models and has been a complete nonissue, so there’s no reason to believe it won’t be the same for the X-T30 III. Some people like to complain for the sake of complaining. The benefit of the Film Dial is that it can store up to three Film Simulation Recipes, bringing the total possible Recipes that can be programmed into the camera at any one time up to 11 (certainly Nigel Tufnel would buy this camera just for this). As of right now, the X-T30 III and X-E5 are the only two cameras capable of 11 Recipes; however, I hope that Fujifilm brings the FS1/FS2/FS3 Recipe option to the X-T50 and X-M5, and any future models with the Film Dial.

The one negative with the Film Dial on the X-T30 III is that—like the X-E5—it’s limited to only six hard-set Film Simulations. Unfortunately, Classic Negative and Nostalgic Neg. were both excluded. For Classic Negative, that’s inexplicable, as it’s one of the most popular and iconic options. I think if Fujifilm had used the same Film Dial found on the X-T50 and X-M5, that would have been better. While the Film Dial isn’t perfect and certainly can be improved, it’s still a feature that I love, and I’m happy to see it on this camera.

The lens? I personally don’t use zooms very often. I’m more of a prime guy myself. It seems like a budget-friendly alternative to the 10-24mm f/4. I’m sure it’s sufficiently good, and a decent starter kit lens. I have no intentions of owning it, personally. Sold with the X-T30 III, I’m sure it’s worthwhile for $150; I definitely wouldn’t spend $400 on one.

There are two (very annoying) complaints that I’ve seen regarding this announcement: Fujifilm should not release any camera until they have Sony-like AF, and where’s the X-Pro4? Let’s discuss both.

I’ve talked about autofocus at great lengths (just type “autofocus” in the search bar), so I won’t spend much energy on it. My basic argument, though, is that Fujifilm’s AF is pretty good, better than what’s existed for the vast majority of photography, and if you can’t make it work for you, it’s largely user error. Yes, your fault. People are offended by that, but sometimes the truth hurts. Once you accept that truth, it reveals a path forward so that you can move beyond your AF obstacles. It might take learning some new skills and/or learning some new things about your camera that you didn’t realize. Fujifilm’s AF is more than sufficient for 99%+ photographers and situations if you know what you’re doing. Those who constantly complain about it have 1) unrealistic expectations (Canikony brands have been making AF for much, much longer, have larger R&D budgets, and larger teams, so it stands to reason that theirs is and always will be better), 2) an unwillingness to accept that they are a part of the problem (more so than the gear), and 3) no motivation for self-improvement.

Can and will Fujifilm improve their AF? Absolutely. I have zero doubts that they’re working hard on that right now and have been for years. Will those improvements have a practical benefit for most of their customers? Probably not, because we’re nearing the peak of an inverted U curve, which means that each improvement will have a smaller and smaller and smaller impact (this is true for every brand, especially Sony and Canon, who might actually be nearing the back side of the curve). Also, realize that any obstacle—including AF woes—can be overcome if you are willing to self-reflect and put in the work. Those who constantly complain about this topic are unwilling on both accounts.

As for the X-Pro4, which I’m predicting will be called X-Pro5, I’m somewhat confident that it will arrive within the next six months, probably announced in January or February. It will likely kick off X-Trans VI, and the X-T30 III will mark the end of the fifth-generation. In other words, the next X-Pro is coming, just have a little more patience.

Anyway, the Fujifilm X-T30 III will hold the important role of budget-friendly non-PASM model with an EVF. The X-T30 II and the X-T30 before it served this purpose very well, and, despite less fanfare, sold a heck-of-a-lot of copies. The X-T30 III will quietly be a major success, too. At only $999, it’s probably the best value camera in the lineup. Yes, some models are cheaper. Yes, some are better. But none quite offer the bang-for-the-buck that the X-T30 III does.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X-T30 III in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T30 III in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T30 III in Charcoal:
Amazon, B&H, Moment
Fujinon 13-33mm f/3.5-6.3:
B&H, Nuzira

What Fujifilm X-Trans VI Might Look Like

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

The sun is beginning to set on Fujifilm’s fifth-generation of X-series cameras. Soon, dawn will break on X-Trans VI. This is a much-too-early speculation on what that might look like. In other words, take all of this with a massive grain of salt, because these are merely guesses. I don’t have any inside information. Many of my prior guesses were completely wrong, but a few were spot on—I anticipate that many of these will prove to be incorrect, too, but that some will turn out to be right.

I don’t know with certainty that the upcoming Fujifilm X-T30 III will be the final fifth-generation camera. The X-T30 II was the last fourth-generation model. The X-E series has often marked the end of a generation by being the second-to-last model. So with the recent release of the Fujifilm X-E5, and the upcoming announcement of the X-T30 III, I think it’s a pretty safe bet that the fifth-generation is coming to a close, and that the sixth-generation is right around the corner.

To start with, let’s talk about a potential timeline. I think the first sixth-generation camera will be the X-Pro5 (maybe they’ll call it X-Pro4), and it will be announced in January or February, and ship in February or March. After that will be the X-H3 and X-H3s, which will come in late-spring and/or summer. I’m going to go way out on a limb, and say that an X80 (followup to the X70) will come in fall of 2026. If this all happens, next year will be a busy year for the X-series.

In 2027, I see the X-T6 arriving in late-winter or early-spring. The X-S30 will likely follow in the summer or fall. I suspect there will be a GFX release or two, but that’s it for the X-series for that year. In 2028, I anticipate the X100VII in late-winter or early-spring, followed by the X-T60 in late-spring or early-summer, and the X-M5 in the fall. 2029 will wind down the sixth-generation, with an X-HF2 (not X-Trans, but technically X-series) early in the year and an X-E6 later in the year. There will not be a followup to the X-T30 III. It’s possible that the seventh-generation of X-Trans kicks off towards the end of 2029, possibly with an Eterna 28 (APS-C version of the GFX Eterna 55) cinema camera.

A lot will look the same between X-Trans V and X-Trans VI, as it will be mainly under-the-hood changes. I don’t anticipate any major resolution bump with X-Trans VI; I think it will be more about speed and efficiency. Will Fujifilm continue to use the same sensors? They might. I can see a partially stacked 40mp sensor in the X-Pro3, X-H2, X-T6, and maybe X100VII. I can see them using the 40mp X-Trans V sensor (but paired with a new processor) in the X-T60, X-E6, and maybe X100VII (the X100VII could go either way between non-stacked and partially stacked). I don’t think that the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor will be used any longer, but a new sensor (maybe 30mp) will be added to the lineup, found in the X80, X-S30, and X-M5. The X-H3s might continue to use the same 26mp stacked X-Trans V sensor, or it might have a new-and-improved stacked sensor.

My guess is that the X-Pro5 will have an aspect ratio dial like the GFX100RF, and will be the first X-series model with the XPan aspect ratio. It will probably have the classic EVF feature like the X-E5. It might even have a Film Dial like the X-E5. I really don’t know what else will be different, but I suspect there will be a few surprises. The X-H3s will be a lot like the X-H2s, but with some speed/efficiency improvements plus the ability to use video LUTs like the Eterna 55. The X-H3 will be a lot like the X-H2, but mainly just speed/efficiency improvements. The X80—if Fujifilm decides to make it—will be a massive success, and will serve as Fujifilm’s closest competitor to the Ricoh GR IV.

The X-T6 will be a lot like the X-T5, with mainly just speed and efficiency upgrades. The X-S30 will have a new sensor, I believe, that will boost the resolution a smidge; overall, I don’t think it will be much different than the X-S20. The X100VII will have a new-and-improved lens that can better take full advantage of the 40mp sensor, but otherwise will be quite similar to the X100VII. It could have an X-E5-like Film Dial, too. The X-T60 won’t be a whole lot different than the X-T50, just small improvements. The X-M6 will likely have a new sensor, but otherwise won’t be much different than the X-M5. The X-HF2 will have a hotshoe and/or better flash, but will still be pretty much the same. The X-E6, which might just be called the X-E5s, will just see some small improvements, like Classic Negative added to the Film Dial, and other minor refreshes.

There will probably be two new Film Simulations added: one beginning with the X-Pro5, and another with the X100VII. Some potential Film Sim ideas are Fujicolor PRO 400H emulation that turns pastel with overexposure, Natura (modeled after Natura 1600), Fortia (more vibrant than Velvia), Cross Process (modeled after Velvia 50 that’s been cross processed), Instax, and a more contrasty B&W option. I think they will add a couple more JPEG options, too. I’d like to see Halation Effect (with the options of Off, Weak, Strong) and Light Leak (Off, Intermittent, On), which Fujifilm has already invented, they just need to incorporate. Faded black and vignetting are a couple other options worth considering. They should revamp the Advanced Filters, adding Retro and Expired Film from the X half, and allow Dynamic Range, White Balance, and Grain to be selected. There’s a lot that Fujifilm could do, but a suspect it will be limited to a couple of new Film Simulations, a couple of new JPEG options, and maybe some long-overdue improvements to the Advanced Filters.

Essentially, I think the sixth-generation will look a lot like the fifth, with mostly under-the-hood improvements. If Fujifilm has ever considered releasing an X80, they should probably do so sooner than later; if they do, that camera will be the X-Trans VI headliner. The X-Pro5 will probably be the most different compared to its predecessor. My guess is that there will not be an X-T30 IV or X-T40—the X-T30 III will be the final iteration of that camera; however, they will continue to sell it well into the sixth-generation lifecycle, quietly discontinuing it 2028. Of course, all of this is speculation. Fujifilm could certainly surprise us with all sorts of things—they’ve done it before, and they’ll do it again. A lot seems pretty predictable, though; however, we should expect the unexpected, at least here and there.

The Fujifilm X-Series Buyers Guide — Which Camera is for You

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

A common question I get is, “Which Fujifilm X-series camera should I buy?” With so many options, it can be difficult to figure out which one is right for you. Some models are quite alike, with overlapping features and similar price points, which can be confusing—especially if you’re new to the system. Each camera in Fujifilm’s lineup has its own role to play, and understanding that role makes it much easier to choose the right one for you. To help you out, I’ll break down each X-series camera below and explain its purpose in the lineup—what it’s best at, who it’s for, and why Fujifilm made it. With that foundation, you’ll be better equipped to make your decision.

Fujifilm X-H2s

The Fujifilm X-H2s is Fujifilm’s most premium X-series camera—the flagship model. It’s designed for speed, which makes it the most ideal option for videography, as well as sports and wildlife photography. It’s the only X-series camera—and only APS-C camera—with a stacked sensor, which allows it to be faster than other models. Interestingly, a large majority of the official Fujifilm videos (found on their various YouTube channels) are filmed on this camera—if you want to know what you can do with it cinematically, there are tons and tons of excellent examples online. Because the X-H2s is the top-of-the-line option, it is also the most expensive at $2,799 (after the recent price increase across the Fujifilm lineup).

A couple of possible downsides to the X-H2s are that it’s the largest (along with the X-H2, which shares the same body), which might make it less ideal for travel or walk-around photography, and it doesn’t have the traditional tactile exposure controls that Fujifilm is known for. This is a PASM model that’s specifically intended to be appealing to those coming from Canikony brand cameras, who might not appreciate Fujifilm’s retro-styled bodies. It’s weather sealed and has two card slots (one for CFexpress Type B). The rear LCD screen is vari-angle, and can twist many directions. I find it fascinating that camera reviewers often compare the X-H2s to full-frame models; those are somewhat unfair apples-to-oranges comparisons, but you see it often, which just goes to show that this camera punches above its weight class.

If you really need speed, the Fujifilm X-H2s is your best bet. It’s the top X-series option for video, sports, and wildlife. This is the most “pro” camera in the lineup, if that’s important to you. I have never used this camera personally.

Fujifilm X-H2

The Fujifilm X-H2 is nearly identical to the X-H2s. The main difference is that, instead of a 26mp stacked X-Trans V sensor intended for speed, it has a 40mp non-stacked X-Trans V sensor intended for resolution. It’s not quite as quick as the “s” version, so it’s not as ideal for video, sports and wildlife; however, it’s still snappy, and still excellent for those situations—it’s a great hybrid camera. You simply trade a little speed for megapixels, while saving $600. You get basically the same camera for significantly less money. If you need the fastest X-series model, the “s” version is the one to get; if not, the X-H2 is quite compelling, especially if you are moving over from one of the “big three” brands. I have not used the X-H2 personally.

Fujifilm X-Pro5

There is not currently an X-Pro5. The last camera in this series was the X-Pro3, released in 2019 and discontinued in 2022. A successor is overdue, and likely to come next year (my prediction is in the spring, but that’s merely a guess). Nothing is known about the camera (not even the name… “X-Pro5” is speculation); however, it probably won’t be too dissimilar from other X-Pro models. The X-Pro series offers classic rangefinder styling, a hybrid EVF/OVF, and durability (other than the rear LCD cable on the X-Pro3… that’s another story, and probably why that camera was discontinued). X-Pro is top-of-the-line out of all the retro-styled X-series models. These cameras are beloved, they’re classics—the Leica of Fujifilm, so to speak. There’s not much to say about it at this time other than it’s coming someday, and it will likely be over $2,000 (maybe well over) when it does come. I wouldn’t be surprised if Fujifilm kicked off the sixth generation with this camera. Whenever it is released, you’ll know, because it will definitely make headlines. The picture above is of an X-Pro1.

Fujifilm X100VI

The X100 series is legendary. It’s probably the most iconic Fujifilm line, with a beautiful retro rangefinder design, including a hybrid OVF/EVF. Pairing the 40MP X-Trans V sensor with a fixed 23mm (35mm full-frame equivalent) f/2 lens, the X100VI is perfect for street, travel, and documentary photography. This iteration is the first in the series to have IBIS. The leaf shutter, built-in flash, and built-in ND filter are three especially great but often overlooked features. The X100VI is compact and discreet, yet eye catching—no wonder it is the most viral camera of all time!

Because you cannot change the lens, this camera is not for everyone; however, it can inspire you to see differently because you’re limited to one focal length, which can force you to think more creatively. The Fujifilm X100VI is my “desert island” camera—if I could only have one model for the rest of my life, it would be this one. With that said, I find that the X100-series tends to pair really well with an interchangeable-lens model, for when the 35mm-equivalent focal length just isn’t the right choice. The X100VI isn’t a point-and-shoot; it’s a premium compact, which is reflected by the $1,799 MSRP (after the recent price increase).

Fujifilm X-T5

If there’s one quintessential interchangeable-lens Fujifilm camera, it’s probably the X-T5. It closely embodies Fujifilm’s retro styling and tactile controls, while packing in their latest 40mp X-Trans V sensor and processor. You get IBIS, a three-way tilting LCD, dual card slots, and weather sealing—all in a body that still feels compact. It’s basically an X-H2, but smaller, lighter, better-looking, and cheaper. This is a premium stills-centric model, yet it’s no slouch when it comes to video capabilities. A lot of comparisons have been made to the Nikon Zf, which is a full-frame camera (not necessarily a fair equivalence), yet the X-T5 holds its own pretty well, (again) punching above its weight class.

The X-T5 is a workhorse that can do a bit of everything. It seems well suited for landscapes, portraits, travel, etc., etc.. I used this camera extensively for about a year-and-a-half, then my wife, Amanda, used it for a year (mostly portraits, theater, and video), and now I have it back, and am enjoying photographing with it again. As a stills-centric yet good-for-everything camera, it’s easy to recommend. With an MSRP of $1,899, it’s under 2K but definitely not cheap.

Fujifilm X-T50

The Fujifilm X-T50 is the little brother of the X-T5. It has the same sensor, processor, and IBIS—it’s basically the same internally as the X-T5 and even the X-H2—but lacks weather sealing and dual card slots. It’s smaller and lighter, with a little more plastic. This was the first camera with a Film Dial, which adds a bit of aesthetic versatility, and is great for exploring which Film Simulations you might like best. This is Fujifilm’s mid-range retro SLR-styled camera, but is just as capable as the higher-end X-T5.

Because this camera is smaller and lighter, it’s a little better for travel or walk-around photography. The X-T50 is a bit more beginner or enthusiast orientated than the X-T5, but you can grow with it, since it’s just as capable as the higher end model. At $1,699, it’s only a little cheaper than the X-T5. If size and weight are a priority, that might be a reason to choose this camera, or if you want a slightly less complicated camera; otherwise, the X-T5 is the better option. I really like the X-T50 personally, particularly because of the Film Dial.

Fujifilm X-E5

The Fujifilm X-E5 is the newest X-series camera. It’s basically an X-T50, but in an X100VI-like body. It’s as close as you’re going to get to an interchangeable-lens X100VI, especially when paired with pancake lenses. It’s Fujifilm’s smallest camera with an EVF, which makes it especially great for travel photography, or just everyday carry. It’s also the only model where you can program up to 11 Recipes into it. The X-E5 is the most premium camera in the X-E series, and is solidly mid-tier, with improved build quality over its predecessor. I have no doubt that this will be a big hit, even with the $1,699 price tag. If you like retro rangefinder styling, this is the interchangeable-lens camera to buy.

Fujifilm X-S20

The Fujifilm X-S20 is the little brother of the X-H2s. It’s a hybrid model that’s especially good for video, but is no slouch for stills. It uses the “old” 26mp X-Trans IV sensor paired with the new X Processor 5. It is not weather sealed and has only one card slot. It’s not necessarily retro styled, and lacks the traditional tactile dials found on most Fujifilm models; instead, it has PASM controls similar to the X-H2s and X-H2, and it has an articulating rear LCD screen. It’s intended to be appealing to those coming from Canikony brand cameras. It only has C1-C4 and not C1-C7 like many other Fujifilm cameras, for those who use Film Simulation Recipes. There are two X-S20’s in my house: one belongs to my wife, Amanda, and the other belongs to my son, Jonathan. They both really love it—in fact, my wife chose the X-S20 over the X-T5. At $1,599, this is a mid-tier camera, but it is slightly more affordable than the X-T50 and X-E5.

Fujifilm X-T30 II / X-T30 III

The current entry-level X-series camera with an EVF and retro tactile controls is the Fujifilm X-T30 II. It has the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor and X Processor 4; however, it was the very last fourth-generation model, so it does have some options that the earlier 4th-gen cameras lack, making it seem a bit less dated. At $999, it is definitely more affordable than the options above, making it a compelling choice, and probably the best overall value right now—a great beginners camera. It doesn’t have IBIS, and may not be the best option for video—although, with a gimbal or tripod, it’s certainly capable of recording quality clips.

The X-T50 was not this camera’s successor, but a whole new highly similar line that is a bit more premium. Fujifilm is about to replace the X-T30 II with (what will likely be called) the X-T30 III. Because of this, the X-T30 II can be a bit tough to find in-stock, as I believe Fujifilm has stopped production of it. If you want the best affordable Fujifilm camera, be sure to buy an X-T30 II—that is, if you can find one. Fujifilm is expected to announce the X-T30 III later this year, likely in the fall. I anticipate it being nearly identical to the X-T30 II, just with the new X Processor 5, possibly with a Film Dial like the X-T50, and perhaps a couple hundred dollars more expensive. In all likelihood, the X-T30 III will be the last fifth-generation X-series camera.

Fujifilm X-M5

The Fujifilm X-M5 is the bargain basement entry-level X-series camera, with an MSRP of $899. It has a striking rangefinder-like retro design, but lacks traditional tactile controls (it has PASM instead) and lacks an EVF. It’s the smallest and lightest interchangeable-lens model in the lineup. Like the X-S20, it pairs the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor with the X Processor 5. It’s touted as a hybrid camera that’s excellent for video, but it lacks IBIS. In a sense, X-M5 is the little brother of the X-S20, and in a sense it’s the X-E5’s smaller sibling. If you have a tight budget or if you prioritize size and weight, this camera might be for you. Between this and the X-T30 II, if you are primarily a videographer, the X-M5 is your best bet, but if you are primarily a stills photographer, I recommend the X-T30 II. It seems like a good option as your very first camera, or else as a second camera for when your larger model isn’t ideal. I’ve never used the X-M5 personally.

Fujifilm X half

Last and maybe least is the Fujifilm X half. This is technically an X-series camera, but it’s not X-Trans, and isn’t APS-C, either. It has a 1″ Bayer sensor orientated vertically, with a fixed 32mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens. It’s essentially a digital version of half-frame cameras, like the Fujica Half, Olympus Pen, Kodak H35N, and Pentax 17. The X half has as much in common with the Instax Evo line as it does the X-series, and bridges a gap between the two systems, with a foot in both camps. It’s a heck-of-a-lot of fun, but definitely less serious than all of the options above. This could be a toy for the photographer who has everything, or a casual camera for events and vacations, or a first camera for your child that shows an interest in photography. You’re unlikely to capture portfolio-worthy pictures with the X half, but for social media or scrapbooks, this camera is quite excellent. Both my wife and I enjoy using it (and have fought over it), but neither of us would chose it as our primary model. At $850, it’s a bit expensive for what it is.

Conclusion

If you’re still unsure which Fujifilm cameras are right for you, let me break it down even more simply. If you are coming from one of the big three camera companies and want the easiest transition, you’re going to look at the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-S20. If you are primarily a videographer, you’ll want to consider those same three cameras, and I’ll throw in the X-M5 if you are on a tight budget. If you simply want the best-of-the-best, the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-T5 are your top options (and the next X-Pro, whenever that comes out). If you are primarily a stills photographer, the X-T5 is top-of-the-line (the next X-Pro will be, as well), the X-T50 and X-E5 are nearly as good (and smaller), and the X-T30 II is the best bargain. The best looking cameras are the next X-Pro (assuming that Fujifilm doesn’t change much), X100VI, and X-E5. If you don’t want to invest in a whole system, and just want to dip your toes into the Fujifilm world, the X100VI is what you should buy. If you don’t have a lot of money to spend, the X-T30 II and X-M5 are the two cameras you need to consider. If you have large hands and/or plan to use long lenses, the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-S20 have the best ergonomics, and I’ll throw in the X-T5 as a bonus. If you want small and lightweight, look at the X-M5, X-E5, X100VI, and (of course) the X half. If you want the most enjoyable, the X half, X100VI, X-E5, and the next X-Pro are the ones to consider. I’m sure I’m missing some situations, but I hope this provides clarity for some of you who are trying to decide which camera to purchase, and are just unsure.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X-H2:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-H2s:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T5 in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T5 in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T50 in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T50 in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T50 in charcoal:
Amazon, B&H, Moment
Fujifilm X100VI in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X100VI in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-S20:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-E5 in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-E5 in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T30 II in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T30 II in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-M5 in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-M5 in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in black:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in charcoal:
Amazon, B&H

Autofocus and an Upside-Down U

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Captured with a Fujifilm X-M1 camera & Fujinon 90mm f/2 lens

Fujifilm’s autofocus will never be as good as Canon, Sony, or Nikon’s, and that’s ok. I’ve explained this before a couple of times, so forgive me for repeating myself. There are some highly unrealistic expectations that need to be put to rest, which I hope this article accomplishes.

There are a lot of comments floating around the internet along the lines of, “Fujifilm’s autofocus sucks.” And, “Fujifilm needs class leading autofocus like Sony and Canon.” And, “If Fujifilm doesn’t address AF on the next generation, I’m leaving.” And many other similar sentiments. But these comments are out of touch with reality. Let me explain why Fujifilm’s autofocus will never be as good as the Canikony brands, and why it doesn’t matter.

There are three reasons why Fujifilm’s AF isn’t as good as the three big brands. First, those companies have been making autofocus systems for much longer. Sony (through Konica and Minolta) have been making AF since the 1970’s—they were the first (via Konica), and the first to have what was considered a “good” AF system (via Minolta). Canon and Nikon have been developing AF since the 1980’s. Since they had such a big head start, it is only logical that they’re further along. Second, the Canikony brands have more R&D funds to commit to autofocus development and improvements. They have larger teams with larger budgets, and it’s probably easier for them to attract the most experienced talent. Last but not least—and this was pointed out by PetaPixel—the big three have put most of their effort over the last handful of years into AF, and have largely ignored image quality improvements; in some cases, autofocus was prioritized to the detriment of image quality. That is a path I would highly discourage Fujifilm from pursuing, personally.

Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 90mm f/2 — Fujichrome Sensia 100

While Canon, Sony, and Nikon have put a lot of their eggs in the AF basket, we’ve long surpassed the point of diminishing returns—the Inverted U Curve, for those who have read Malcolm Gladwell’s David & Goliath (a book I definitely recommend). How good does AF really need to be? At what point is it good enough for almost everyone? I think we passed that point years ago. For almost the entire history of photography and videography, there was no autofocus. It was manual focus only. Yet today’s photos and videos aren’t necessarily better than they were then (in some ways, they might be subjectively worse). If we compare Minolta’s first “good” AF to the AF of any camera made in the last 25 years, it’s clearly not as good as even the worst examples you could find. In other words, we’re really spoiled today with incredible gear. Fujifilm’s so-called “sucky” AF is better than the best AF from 15 years ago, maybe even 10. Were we incapable of creating good photos and videos then? Are photos and videos captured today using the latest Canikony cameras better than anything previously? Of course not! Some people seem to think that photography has only been around for a few years.

It was never about the gear, it has always been about the one using the gear. Yes, some tools make it a bit easier to achieve your desired results, but if you really want a certain result, you can do it no matter your camera. You might have to try a little harder, you might have to learn a new skill, or you might have to practice a skill you’ve gotten rusty at, but you can still do it. My guess, though, is that for 98% of people, Fujifilm’s AF is more than good enough just as it is, as was Canikony’s five or ten or even 15 years ago. So does it actually matter that Fujifilm’s autofocus isn’t as good as the three big brands? It might matter to some, but it shouldn’t matter to the vast majority. If you can’t get the job done with the gear you have, the problem isn’t the gear; however, that’s a bitter pill that people don’t want to swallow. Nobody wants to hear that they’re the problem, but without introspection there’s no opportunity for growth.

With all of that said, Fujifilm has done an amazing job creating and improving the autofocus on their cameras, all things considered (aside from that infamous firmware bug last year). With a smaller budget and smaller team (and with a lot less time), they’re not terribly far behind Nikon. I’m sure they will continue to make strides, and—who knows—with AI they might have some breakthroughs that would be difficult otherwise, and which might level the playing field a bit. For most people, these improvements will have little-to-no practical benefit because the AF is already more than sufficient—we’re near the top of the upside-down U. Seriously, how good does it need to be? It’s been more than good enough for me since X-Trans III, and even the older models are decent in daylight situations. Only in extreme cases do the Canikony brands have a clear advantage, yet even those situations aren’t insurmountable if the one behind the camera doesn’t allow them to be. While I’m sure Fujifilm’s autofocus will continue to improve, the difference it will make for most people is very small. Yes, we’re rooting for Fujifilm to be at the head-of-the-pack in every aspect of camera-making, but it’s important to keep expectations realistic, or else we’ll inevitable be disappointed, which will lead to unnecessary resentment—something that’s easy to spot all over the internet.

The Totally Unexpected Camera Coming in 2025… was Completely Expected

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujirumors posted an article today entitled BREAKING: This Totally Unexpected Fujifilm Camera is Coming in 2025 – And I Know You Won’t Believe Me. I believe it and even expected it, because I’ve been saying it for over a year. If you regularly read Fuji X Weekly, you probably believe it, too, and might even have expected it yourself. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve predicted it over the last 14 months—probably a good handful. For some (including myself), this is not a surprise in the least.

In the third paragraph of my Fujifilm X-T50 review (published on May 16, 2024), I stated, “The X-T50 is not the successor to the X-T30 II, but a whole new (yet highly similar) line. Fujifilm plans to sell the X-T30 II alongside the X-T50, similarly to what they did with the X-T3 and X-T4 a few years back. This also means that there is a potential future successor to the X-T30 II, perhaps called the X-T30 III or X-T40; I don’t know that for sure, but I think it is a fair assumption. The main thing for you to know is that the X-T50 is not a replacement for any previous model, but a whole new camera.”

Just two months ago, in my article entitled My Hopes for the Fujifilm X-E5 (published on May 21st), I concluded with this: “My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall….” It looks like that guess was pretty much correct.

For those still scratching their heads, Fujirumors just leaked that the X-T30 II’s successor (which isn’t the X-T50) is coming sometime in 2025. And this is taking the Fujifilm community by surprise. Many people apparently assumed that the X-T50 was the X-T30 II’s successor, even though Fujifilm said from the get-go that it wasn’t. Fuji X Weekly might have been the only website that predicted the X-T30 III (or maybe they’ll call it X-T40, but I doubt it). I don’t have any inside information, I only took Fujifilm at their word, and followed the sequence of past releases to predict this outcome. It just made sense to me.

So what will the Fujifilm X-T30 III look like? I think it will be exactly the same as the X-T30 and X-T30 II (which was mostly just a firmware update to the X-T30), except with the X-Processor 5. In other words, it will have Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace, but otherwise will be pretty much identical to the X-T30 II. Some are predicting an X-T50 but with the 26mp sensor instead of 40mp, but I don’t think so, personally. There will be a price increase, because of inflation (and, in America, the tariffs). The X-T30 II was $900 in 2021, which is $1,070 today, so don’t be surprised if the X-T30 III is about $1,050-$1,100 USD for the body-only outside of America, and $1,300-$1,400 in the US due to tariffs. That’s just the new normal, I think.

The question that some will certainly ask is why does this camera need to exist. The X-M5 is the new entry-level model. The X-S20 is the hybrid PASM model underneath the X-H2/X-H2s. The X-E5 has been upgraded to a mid-tier camera. The X-T50 is also a mid-tier model. Where does the X-T30 III fit into that? I believe that it will be the lowest-tier non-PASM camera, underneath the X-T50 and X-T5. This line has been historically successful for Fujifilm. It offers a more affordable option for those who want an EVF. But… I think it will also be an indication of what’s to come very soon with the other models (aside from the X-E5 and X half): price increases (at least in America, maybe not worldwide). Other brands have already announced higher prices, and Fujifilm will be doing so soon, too, in my opinion.

Of course, I’ve been wrong about plenty of things before. For every one thing that I’ve predicted correct, I’ve predicted two or three completely incorrect. That’s the trouble with guessing the future (ask Robert Zemeckis). I cannot say with any level of certainty what the X-T30 II’s successor will be like, so my predictions should be taken with a large grain of salt. But the fact is that the X-T30 II’s successor is coming soon, and I’m not surprised by it.

Fujifilm should add these X half features to the X-series

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

I got a surprise package in the mail from Fujifilm: the brand-new X half! I will write a review of the camera in a few weeks probably—I haven’t had it nearly long enough to provide any proper insights. It’s a fun little camera, with some positive and negative aspects. We’ll talk about all of that at some point in the future. Today I want to write about how Fujifilm could implement some features of this camera into future X-series models.

Specifically, I want to discuss a few of the new Filters. Filters are not Film Simulations (although some of them are based on Provia); on all other X-series models, these are known as Advanced Filters. The X half has the usual array: Toy Camera, Miniature Effect, Pop Color, High-Key, Low-Key, Dynamic Tone, Soft Focus, and Partial Color. There are also some new ones, that apparently are borrowed from the Instax Evo line: Canvas, Retro, Vignette, Blur, Fisheye, Color Shift, Mirror, Double Exposure, Light Leak, Halation, and Expired Film. Some of these are uninteresting, and probably should have been left off the camera so that one could navigate the menu faster. But some of these are great, and should be included in future X-series models—just maybe not in the same way.

My favorite is Light Leak. With this filter, the camera puts a random faux light leak on your images. You don’t know what you’re going to get, and that serendipity can be thrilling, especially when it just really works with the image. I would love Light Leak to become a JPEG option (like Color Chrome Effect and Grain) on all X-series cameras moving forward. You should have three choices: All (where every picture gets a light leak), Random (where some pictures get it, but most don’t), or Off (for those who don’t want it at all). This would be such a fun thing for Fujifilm to add, and it seems like it wouldn’t be very difficult to do.

Film Leak Filter — Fujifilm X half

Next up is Expired Film, which has three options: Green, Red, and Neutral. This should be a new Advanced Filter on future X-series cameras. On the X half, your Grain settings get applied to the Filters (at least some of them; I haven’t tested them all yet), and not just the Film Simulations; however, on the X-series, you can’t apply Grain to the Advanced Filters. So this is actually two suggestions for Fujifilm: add Expired Film to Advanced Filters, and allow Grain to be selected for Advanced Filters.

Expired Film (Green) Filter — Fujifilm X half diptych

Third is Halation, which puts a red glow around bright highlights. This Filter should be a JPEG option that can be applied to any Film Simulation. I suggest three choices: Off, Weak, Strong. I would love to pair this effect with my CineStill 800T Recipe to more accurately mimic the film. The X half is not necessarily a great option for nighttime photography, so it’s almost a waste on this camera, but I definitely see potential for this effect on other X-series models.

Halation Filter — Fujifilm X half

I haven’t used Retro yet, but I’m sure it would be fine to join the Advanced Filter club. Vignette should probably be added as a JPEG option (like Color Chrome Effect and Grain). In my opinion, Fujifilm should graduate Pop Color to Film Simulation, and call it Fortia. In-camera diptychs are just a ton of fun, but I don’t see that coming to other cameras. The Film Camera Mode is pretty cool, and I’d like to see something similar be included in the next X-Pro or X100-series model (although maybe implemented slightly differently). The X half has plenty of unique features and functions, which is what makes it an interesting camera. In my opinion, some of these need to find their way into other models, and not remain solely on the X half.

Bargain or Bust? The price of a unique experience

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

In 1978, Pentax surprised the photographic world with the Auto 110, a tiny interchangeable-lens SLR that used 110 film cartridges. It was the smallest ILC ever made. For only $249, you got the body, a 24mm f/2.8 lens, a case, and a strap. Pentax discontinued the Auto 110 in 1986.

The concept of this camera was portability and simplicity. It was the smallest and lightest SLR ever made—probably the only one that’s pocketable. It was one of the most simple SLRs to operate. In order to accomplish these goals, Pentax built it around the 110 film format, which was considered subpar and only for amateurs. And that was the paradox: interchangeable-lens SLRs were for enthusiasts and pros, while 110 film was not.

Serious photographers would never, ever use 110 film. The camera was fully auto except for focus; at the time, anything auto was largely considered for novices, as “real photographers” used full manual. Interchangeable-lens SLR cameras were the standard for hobbyists and professionals. The Pentax Auto 110 occupied a weird space of being too robust and expensive for the uninitiated, yet too lackluster for anyone remotely serious. Who would buy it? While plenty of photographers scoffed at the Pentax Auto 110, it sold fairly well, and Pentax continued to make it for eight years—a pretty long run. So how did Pentax pull it off? Why was the camera not a flop?

There is a market for compact, unique, fun, less-serious cameras. The Pentax Auto 110 was able to get the most out of the small film format, delivering image quality that was plenty good enough for everyday moments. No, the pictures weren’t going to grace the cover of magazines or hang on museum walls, but they could be placed into photo albums, or in an 8″x10″ frame and hung in the hallway. It was so small and lightweight that the camera didn’t get in the way, and could be easily carried everywhere. It was simple enough to operate that most anyone could do it, as the complications of larger SLRs were removed. At the very least, it was a conversation starter (still is).

The Auto 110 was more affordable than other SLRs, at only $249. The Canon A-1, released the same year, was $625 (with a 50mm lens). Pentax released the iconic K1000 two years prior—in 1976—with an MSRP of $299 (with a 50mm lens), so for just $50 more one could get a much more respectable camera. It’s pretty interestingly if you adjust these numbers for inflation: $249 in 1978 is $1,230 today, $299 is $1,477, and $625 is $3,087! None of these cameras were cheap, not even the Auto 110.

Which brings me to what I want to discuss today, and that’s the cost of the Fujifilm X half. Unless something unexpected happens, this will be the last post about the new camera until after I get back from the B&H BILD Expo next month, so if you are tired of hearing about it, just bear with me a moment—I promise that we’ll get to other things. Let’s dive in!

Bench with a View – Prefumo Canyon, CA – Fujifilm X-E4 & Pentax-110 24mm – Pacific Blues Recipe

Probably the biggest criticism of the X half is the price. $850 seems like a lot of money, because it is. The camera is a little expensive. I’ve seen plenty of people say that if it was $400 or $500, that would be the right cost. If it was 2015, I might agree, but there’s been some significant inflation since then. $500 in 2015 is $680 today, which is what I estimate would be a fair price for this camera (I said $700, but close enough). The reality is that things are expensive in 2025. And if you consider that the X half is probably the first to be adjusted for the tariffs, I think it’s more of a foreshadowing of what’s to come across the entire camera market in the coming months.

Yet the X half is still much cheaper—$380 cheaper—than the Pentax Auto 110 was in 1978, accounting for inflation. I knew the late-1970’s were rough economically, but I didn’t realize just how expensive things were. While there is plenty that’s divergent, I see some parallels between the Auto 110 and the X half, namely portability, simplicity, and casual fun. If the X half was transported back in time to 1978, it would sell for $172, which would have been considered a good bargain for the time; however, in 2025, $850 is a lot of money for what it is. Even as prices seem to skyrocket, it’s still much better than it was in the late-1970’s.

So where does that leave us? I think it’s good to have a healthy historical perspective, but that doesn’t help the wallet feel any less empty. I don’t know the future, but I think it’s unlikely that the tariffs are fully settled, and as things fall into place over the coming months, the opportunity to lower the price is a strong possibility. If the camera sells really well, and the backorder list is long, even if Fujifilm could drop the price, they would be silly to do so (but who knows, maybe they will). I don’t see the historic X100VI demand, but all indications are that preorder sales have been strong. I believe that the camera will do quite well for Fujifilm. Time will tell, though.

If you can accept the X half for what it is, and forgive it for not being what it’s not, it could be a really fun camera for capturing everyday moments. It’s not a serious camera for serious photography, yet it is priced nearly as if it is—just like the Pentax Auto 110 was. If you think you’d enjoy it, then consider grabbing one at some point; if not, it’s very easy to pass, and consider a more advanced model instead—you can get a Fujifilm X-T30 II with a lens today for less than a Pentax K1000 with a lens cost in the late-1970’s, adjusting for inflation. There are plenty of options for those that want an enthusiast or pro camera. The X half is one of a kind—the most unique digital camera ever made—and as such, it’s not going to be for everyone, and that’s ok.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X half in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment
Fujifilm X half in charcoal:
Amazon, B&H, Moment
Fujifilm X half in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment

The Fujifilm X half Target Market — Why most get this wrong, and why it matters

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

There’s been a lot of negativity within the community about the new Fujifilm X half camera. A lot of positivity, too, but definitely a lot of gloom. I think it stems from a misunderstanding of who the camera is for. Understanding better the intended market segment might help to make sense of the camera. I think it’s also important to state that just because a particular model is not for you personally, doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t exist—if it becomes commercially successful (which I’m confident it will be), that is a strong argument that it should indeed exist because it obviously filled a market void, but maybe just not the particular void affecting you. It’s certainly ok to express your opinions about it, but preferably in a kind and constructive way. Not everything I said was positive because in all honesty, not everything about it is roses and rainbows; however, that doesn’t mean the camera is junk. With that out of the way, let’s get into this.

So who is the Fujifilm X half for? In my opinion, there are several primary groups. And just because someone doesn’t fit any of those groups, that doesn’t mean they won’t buy or appreciate the camera. I think this is a polarizing model that is definitely not for everyone, or even for most people. Some of you will love it, some of you will hate it, and that’s ok. This camera isn’t for everyone who regularly reads this website. In fact, the target audience most likely has never heard of Fuji X Weekly, or is maybe only vaguely familiar (but probably not).

One group is those who have recently discovered the joys of film photography, particularly those who have purchased the Pentax 17 or Kodak H35N—but not exclusively those people. Some have a 35mm point-and-shoot from the ’90’s. Some have been using Fujifilm Quicksnap disposable cameras. Film photography has seen a significant resurgence from the younger generation; however, it’s been hindered by the high cost of film and development, and sometimes the lack of availability. A camera that provides a similar experience and even aesthetic, but with the convenience of digital and with a one-time-fee entry point will be appealing to some of these people.

Another group is the digicam lovers. Surprisingly, the number one digital camera brand in Japan in 2024 was Kodak (actually, JK Imaging using the Kodak brand name). They’re selling a ton of cheap digicams that are basically 15-year-old tech and designs. Nobody in the camera world takes this seriously, but it is a sizable demographic. Retro digicams from 15 or 20 years ago are all the rage right now, too. The X half offers a graduation of sorts for those looking for a more premium option.

A third group is Instax users. Instax is the camera division’s money maker much more than the X-series is. Instant film photography is big and has been for awhile, and Fujifilm is king of the hill. At some point one can outgrow Instax; the Evo series is supposed to help with that, but it’s not a big step. So how can Fujifilm convince Instax photographers to take the leap into the X-series world? With a digital camera that offers a simple and analog-like experience with some Instax compatibility, of course!

In my opinion, those are the three main groups. That’s a pretty large umbrella, and you only need a small portion from each to sell a lot of copies. If you are not in one of those groups, you may still find the camera appealing, and might buy and love it (I might be one of those people); however, you’re not necessarily the target market for the X half. What’s fascinating—genius, really—is that this is a potential stepping stone into the system from the bottom. There’s always a lot of discussions about market share, and convincing those from other brands to join the fold. This camera is intended to bring in outsiders, and grow the brand unconventionally yet organically. Then, later, some of these people will buy an X-M5, X-T50, X100VI, etc., as their second X-series camera. I bet thousands get into the system this way.

Unfortunately, some of those who aren’t the target market have been trashing the camera online (not on this website, but elsewhere), and—much worse—speaking harshly of those who might buy it. My estimation is that the majority of sales will come from first-time Fujifilm photographers. I think it will sell fairly well to the existing X-series customer base because it’s a fun concept, but primarily it’s going to be someone’s first dip into the X-series pool. Instead of degrading these folks for liking and buying the camera, we should gladly welcome them into the community. If they have a good experience, they may just stick around for awhile, and that’s a very good thing for the brand and photography in-general. I think we need to be more welcoming and accepting of these newcomers, and not criticize them for making the purchase. I don’t think anyone here is doing that, but I’ve definitely seen it elsewhere, and it’s not healthy. It’s ok if this camera isn’t for you, but it is certainly for someone, and they’re going to absolutely love it.

My Hopes for the Fujifilm X-E5

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

One of Fujifilm’s most beloved lines is the X-E series. While never the most popular, X-E cameras have a passionate cult-like following. My first Fujifilm camera was an X-E1, so I have a special place in my heart for the line. The X-E4 is currently my favorite for travel photography, especially when paired with pancake lenses. At this time, Fujifilm doesn’t offer an X-E camera—the last one was the X-E4, but it was discontinued over two years ago.

The X-E1, which was announced in the fall of 2012, was a striking camera that caught a lot of people’s attention with its retro styling and compact design; however, there were some initial issues (later rectified via firmware updates) that hindered the perception of it. One year later, Fujifilm released the X-E2, which had a new sensor and was largely free of the problems that had given its predecessor bad press. This was a successful model for Fujifilm, but the X-series was still pretty new, with a small (but quickly growing) market share. The X-E2s was released three years later; it was almost just a firmware update disguised as a new camera, and Fujifilm later gave that same firmware to the X-E2. A lot of people consider the X-E2 and the X-E2s (which had a pretty short run) to be the same camera, because they basically are (although not 100%). In the fall of 2017, Fujifilm announced the X-E3, at a time when the X-series seemed to be hitting its stride, with several commercially successful models coming before (X-Pro2, X100F, X-T2, X-T20). I think there were some high sales expectations for the X-E3; however, demand turned out to be sluggish, and the camera had to be discounted in order to move the inventory. Because it was considered a bit of a “flop” (too many copies were manufactured for the actual demand), there were some rumblings that the X-E3 might be the last model in that series. Thankfully it wasn’t.

White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe

In March of 2021, Fujifilm released the X-E4. I preordered my copy the moment it was announced; if I hadn’t, I might not own one today. Fujifilm used the sales figures of the X-E3 to estimate the demand for its successor, which was a fair assumption, but what they didn’t know is that the X100V was about to go viral, and it was going to take the X-E4 with it. Demand for the X-E4 turned out to be much greater than it had been for the X-E3; however, as luck would have it, this was during the Covid global parts shortage, and Fujifilm had trouble securing materials to manufacture more copies. Two years after it was released, and with a very long backorder list, the camera was discontinued.

Because there was so much unfulfilled demand, the second-hand market for the X-E4 went nuts. It was pretty common to find a used X-E4 selling for 50% more than the MSRP of a new model, and sometimes double. Crazy! If sales had been slow, it very well might have been the final nail in the X-E coffin; however, sales were good, except that Fujifilm discontinued the camera at the peak of its popularity because they ran out of parts. Now, a little over two years later, apparently a new model is forthcoming. Interestingly, in 2023 I predicted that the X-E5 might come in the spring of 2025… not a bad guess, only slightly off. Let me quickly discuss what I hope for with the X-E5.

Beach Chairs – Folly Beach, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Velvia Film

A lot of people wanted to buy the X-E4 but just couldn’t find one in stock, so I wouldn’t change much. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. There are five things I would do different, and otherwise I’d leave it alone. I don’t think Fujifilm needs to reinvent the wheel here.

The five things that I would change, which would make the X-E5 pretty much perfect in my eyes, are simple: use the Shutter/ISO combo dial of the X100/X-Pro series, include an M/C/S switch, include a rear command dial, improve the EVF resolution, and use the X-Processor 5. That’s it. Keep the design the same, keep the sensor the same, use the same battery—keep almost all of it the same. Do this, and it will be a very successful camera.

Some people will demand IBIS and claim that the X-E5 must have it or the camera’s a dud. I don’t care if it does or doesn’t have IBIS, I’m fine either way. For still photography, IBIS is nice, but is oftentimes very overstated. It’s not a critical feature whatsoever for most people and circumstances. It does add weight (and probably size), cost, and battery life—in other words, there are tradeoffs. I’m ok with either choice, but I definitely lean towards its exclusion.

Tram Track – Houston, TX – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipes

Will it have a small grip like the X-E3? It could, but if it doesn’t have IBIS, it’s lightweight enough that the omission is not a problem (it’s not a problem on the X-E4); personally, I’d welcome it for times when a larger lens is attached to the camera. They could include a built-in flash (the X-E1 and X-E2 had a flash), but it doesn’t bother me even slightly that the X-E4 doesn’t have one. I’d be a little surprised if the X-E5 has the 40mp X-Trans V sensor, but it certainly could. I’m more inclined to believe that it will have the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor like the X-S20 and X-M5, if for no other reason than to keep the cost down. The Film Dial? I like it personally, and I’d be curious to see how it might be implemented, but it doesn’t seem like an easy addition (the EVF is in the way), so I’m guessing no, the camera won’t have it.

One final point I’d like to make in this article is in regards to timing. The X-E1 was the second-to-last X-Trans I camera (X-M1 was last), the X-E2s was the second-to-last X-Trans II camera (X70 was last), the X-E3 was the second-to-last X-Trans III camera (X-H1 was last), and the X-E4 was the second-to-last X-Processor 4 model (X-T30 II was last). Fujifilm has used the X-E series to mark the sunset of each generation, with one camera model to follow. It’s reasonable to assume that we’re nearing the end of the fifth-generation. My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall, and the X-Pro4 (maybe called X-Pro5), which will be the first sixth-generation camera, will be announced in January or February of 2026. I’ve guessed wrong many times before, so take this with a massive grain of salt.

Ode to my First Fujifilm Camera

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Tree of Broken Glass – North Salt Lake, UT – Fujifilm X-E1

Ever since I first saw the Fujifilm X100, X-Pro1, and X-E1 in 2011 and 2012, I wanted to buy one. These cameras were significantly different from the other digital models on the market, and seemingly more similar to classic film cameras. I’d see them in various camera magazines, and I’d eagerly read the reviews and study the pictures. I was fairly new to digital photography, having purchased my first DSLR in 2009, but I found the experience frustrating and disappointing. It was so much different than film, and I felt like I was learning photography all over again.

I had been a stubborn digital holdout for a decade, choosing film because I disliked digital. I would brag that I could easily distinguish a digital image from a film photo. But digital technology quickly advanced, becoming better and better. I knew that I needed to get onboard the train before getting completely left behind at the station. Because I had a couple of 35mm Pentax bodies, and you could use K-Mount lenses on Pentax DSLRs, I initially went with that brand. I have absolutely nothing against Pentax (I own a couple of Ricoh GR cameras), but it just wasn’t a good fit for me.

Barn by the Tetons – Grand Teton NP, WY – Fujifilm X-E1

Unfortunately, at the time that the original Fujifilm X-series cameras were released, I could not afford them. They were outside of my budget. Oh, if I just had a few hundred dollars more to spend on a camera, I’d buy one, I would tell myself. However, Fujifilm was just out of reach.

Time went on, and I jumped from brand-to-brand-to-brand, never satisfied with my gear. I thought maybe I was just being discontented, and I should try harder to find gratification with what I had. But contentment seemed illusive. After a number of years, I sold all of my digital gear except for one point-and-shoot digicam and my cellphone (I still had a couple of film cameras), and—for the most part—took a break from photography. Well, that break was short-lived, because I moved to Utah, which is a photographer’s playground, and I couldn’t resist the urge to create photographs.

Bison In The Road – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1

This time, I was determined to buy a Fujifilm camera. I had never owned one, and didn’t really know what to expect, but I knew they were different. I couldn’t afford the current offerings, so I purchased a used Fujifilm X-E1, which was now a four-year-old model. The X-Pro2 was brand-new, and I would have loved to buy it, but it was not anywhere near my budget. The current X-E model was the X-E2s, and that was also unattainable for me at the time. Happily, I found an X-E1 that I could afford, so I bought it. The manual controls felt natural and made so much sense to me. I was reminded of why I loved photography. It was instantly clear to me that Fujifilm cameras were what I had been looking for all along.

The purchase of that X-E1 sent me on a path that I’m still on today, and it’s been an incredible journey! To say that it changed my life is a massive understatement, no hyperbole. Although it wasn’t a brand-new camera, I loved it. I have a special place in my heart for the X-E1, and all of the other X-E models, including my Fujifilm X-E4, which is one of my favorite cameras today. I find it sad that Fujifilm is not currently making any X-E bodies (the X-E4 was discontinued two years ago), but I’m hopeful that the series will continue on, and the next iteration isn’t too far out.

Some People Don’t Like the Fujifilm GFX100RF, This is What Fujifilm Should Do

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm recently released the GFX100RF; while the press has been largely positive, there have been a lot of criticisms in the comments section of articles and in forums. The complaints mostly revolve around two things: the lack of IBIS, and a maximum aperture of only f/4. What should Fujifilm do about this?

It’s important to understand that the Fujifilm GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo ever made. It’s the most affordable (aside from used) and portable option for digital medium-format photography. That was Fujifilm’s goal for this model, and they achieved it quite fantastically. With that in mind, all of the positive press is easily understood. So what accounts for all the negative comments? I believe there are a few possible explanations.

First, the GFX system is niche, and is not for everyone. Most photographers don’t need it, but some do, and some who don’t “need” it enjoy GFX anyway; however, it’s not mainstream, and likely never will be. Because the initial expectations were that the GFX100RF was a medium-format X100VI, people thought this was going to be a camera for the masses. It’s not. It’s a niche camera in a niche system. While it might offer the best way to dip your toes into GFX before deciding whether or not to take the plunge, it is not a camera that most will appreciate. It will never sell nearly as many copies as the X100VI (although it could become the best-selling GFX model). Perhaps the comparisons to the X-series camera created some unrealistic expectations. Even though there are some similarities to the X100VI and even the X70, this camera is definitely divergent from both, and those comparisons should be taken with a grain of salt. If the new camera was literally a medium-format X100VI, it would be a lot different, including bulkier and more expensive. Some might want that, but this camera is not a medium-format X100-series model. It should be appreciated for what it is (smallest, lightest, cheapest), and not criticized for not being what it was never intended to be (a medium-format X100VI).

Second, I think most of the complaints are from those who have little or no experience with medium-format cameras, and have unrealistic understandings of the norms and physics of the format. Literally, there are some who have said they’d never buy the camera unless it had an f/1.7 lens. Yeah, Fujifilm could do that, but it would be so large, heavy, and expensive, I doubt anyone would buy. My guess is that the majority of those criticizing the camera were never going to buy it, but were always going to find an excuse to pass. Interestingly, the closest medium-format camera-lens combo in size and weight is the Hasselblad 907X (plus CFV 100C back) with the 28mm f/4 lens—which also lacks IBIS, has an f/4 maximum aperture, and costs nearly twice as much as the GFX100RF.

Which brings me to third: trolls. The internet is full of them, and the Fujifilm community is no exception. In fact, I’d say that the number of trolls lurking around Fujifilm content has dramatically increased over the last couple of years. It doesn’t help that one troll can have many accounts, and use a variety of personas. You might see a whole thread conversion, and not realize that it’s just one person talking to themselves using multiple names. It makes them appear to hold a popular opinion, but in reality most disagree. If you are an internet troll, you quite literally need professional help, and I urge you to seek out the mental health help you obviously desperately need. Interestingly, when you meet photographers in-person, you realize that trolls don’t exist in real life, they’re only on the internet. I met hundreds and hundreds of photographers over the last year, and can attest that none of them are trolls. But go to the comments section of most photography sites (thankfully, not this one), and probably anywhere from a quarter to a half of the comments are from trolls. I’d encourage content creators to crack down on internet trolls—if you don’t put up with them, they tend to go away, which makes the experience better for the real people who want to enjoy your website.

Now, this is what I propose to Fujifilm: make an actual medium-format X100VI. Call it the GFX100RF-XL. Give it a 45mm f/2 lens, or, if that’s just an impossible maximum aperture (which it probably is), go with f/2.8. Give it IBIS and an optical viewfinder (maybe like what’s in the X-Pro2). Yes, the body might need to be 25% or even 50% bigger. The lens would likely be 150% or 200% larger, maybe more. It might weigh twice as much as the GFX100RF. It’ll probably cost three thousand dollars more. But there are a lot of people who claim to want this, so give it to them. Let them have the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. If it’s a big success, then they’ll have proven their criticisms both valid and valuable. Win-win. If the camera struggles to sell well, then Fujifilm knows to ignore those people in the future (so you better pony up if Fujifilm does this!).

I do think it’s worth exploring if the demand is actually real—I believe that some of it is real. There are people who would be all over a medium-format X100VI, despite the size, weight, and cost increase. It would be a dream-come-true for them. Why not find out just how many there are? If money was no object to me, I’d happily own both a GFX100RF and a GFX100RF-XL. At the very least, this camera would grab headlines, and bring attention to the brand. Most likely it won’t sell as many copies as the GFX100RF, but it would likely sell well enough to justify its existence, and become a legendary model in time, if not right away.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100RF in black:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira, WEX
Fujifilm GFX100RF in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira, WEX
Fujifilm X100VI in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex, Nuzira
Fujifilm X100VI in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex, Nuzira

Why Fujifilm made the GFX100RF so small and lightweight

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

PetaPixel posted a couple of articles relating—directly and indirectly—to the Fujifilm GFX100RF, which I found quite interesting. In the first, Every Design Decision on the Fujifilm GFX100RF Was Made to Keep It Compact, they interviewed Makoto Oishi, a Product Planning Manager at Fujifilm, to discuss the ethos of the new camera’s design. In the second article, Compact and Interchangeable Lens Camera Demand Is Diverging, PetaPixel looks at a BCN+R report about market trends between fixed-lens and interchangeable-lens models.

Makoto told PetaPixel, “[O]ur first priority was how to make it smaller and lighter weight.” That’s pretty much the entirety of the article, as the rest is simply explaining why the camera does not have IBIS or a larger maximum aperture than f/4 and other design choices. It’s worth reading, if you are curious about those things. The main point: Fujifilm set out to make it as small and lightweight as possible. Interestingly, they did create mockups of versions with IBIS and larger apertures, but it required the camera to be significantly larger and heavier, which went against their “first priority” of small size and less weight. IBIS alone, according to this interview, would have doubled the camera’s size, because the lens would have to project to a much larger area.

The lens is pretty remarkable in that it is extremely compact for medium-format, and it barely covers the sensor. That’s why IBIS wasn’t practical, as it would have required a different and much larger lens. That’s why the maximum aperture is “only” f/4, as a larger aperture would not only have required a larger lens, but it would likely begin to show vignetting and corner softness when wide open. All of the design choices make sense when viewed through the prism of Fujifilm’s top priority: size and weight. The engineers succeeded, and did so quite fantastically.

Driveway – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 30mm f/3.5 – Superia Negative Recipe

Now you might disagree with the “first priority” that Fujifilm gave the GFX100RF team. You might not appreciate that the GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo that has ever been made. You might have wished that Fujifilm’s top goal was to make this as premium of a camera as possible, or balanced somewhere in-between premium and size/weight/cost. I think that’s where a lot of the criticisms are found. There are some (quite) vocal critics who disagree with the design ethos, and wished that this camera was different.

This is where the second PetaPixel article comes in. Interestingly, interchangeable-lens camera sales are declining year-over-year, while fixed-lens camera sales are increasing because of a renewed interest in compact cameras. Who is leading the fixed-lens camera market? Kodak. Surprised? It’s JK Imaging selling cheap point-and-shoots on Amazon under the Kodak PixPro name—cameras that are basically 15-year-old tech digicams. Second is Fujifilm, thanks to the massive success of the X100VI, which has already outsold all of the previous X100-series models, and also the Instax Evo line. Canon is third—largely because of their nine-year-old (but still in production) ELPH 360 digicam—but declining (the PowerShot V1 will certainly change that trajectory to some degree). Kenko Tokina is fourth with their tiny toy cameras and digicams. Panasonic is fifth and on the rise, due to the sales success of the DC-ZS99. Ricoh is sixth, thanks to the GR III and GR IIIx, and would probably rank higher if they manufactured those cameras at a higher rate to meet the current demand. Most of the fixed-lens cameras that are selling like hotcakes right now are cheap point-and-shoots; the exceptions are the Fujifilm X100VI and Ricoh GR III/GR IIIx.

If you are trying to understand why Fujifilm chose to make size, weight, and cost the priority for the GFX100RF, that’s why. Simply, it’s market trends. By making the camera as small, lightweight, and affordable as possible, Fujifilm gave it the best chance for market success. The early indicators seem to show that it was the best choice, but only time will tell. That’s not going to make those who wish that Fujifilm had made other aspects—like stabilization and maximum aperture—more important feel any better, but I hope it sheds some light on the why, even if you disagree.

With the massive success of the X100VI, if sales figures for the GFX100RF are good, and if Fujifilm were to release some other fixed-lens option (say, the half-frame camera that’s been rumored), it’s quite possible that Fujifilm will find itself at the very top of the fixed-lens market, which is a growing segment. But, I think it’s also quite possible that, as the months pass by, more and more fixed-lens cameras will be released by other manufacturers, heating up the competition, and making it more difficult to stay on top. Getting quality (and exciting) products out ahead of competitors is going to be a big long-term win for Fujifilm in my opinion; however, predicting the future is impossible, and I’ve certainly been wrong plenty of times before, so who knows? It does seem like smart moves to me, though. Overall, the GFX100RF is likely only going to be a small contributor to Fujifilm’s fixed-lens sales numbers (it’s a $4,900 camera, after all, and GFX models don’t move nearly as quickly as X-series), but it will probably do well for the company’s bottom line, which is good if you’d like to see them continue to make interesting cameras well into the future.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100RF in black:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira, WEX
Fujifilm GFX100RF in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira, WEX

Introducing the Fuji X Weekly + WEX Photo Video Fujifilm X-T50 Collaborative Bundle

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Last year, WEX Photo Video asked if I’d be interested in assembling a Fujifilm-related camera bundle. It could be anything that I wanted, just as long as the products made sense together. I decided on a first-time-Fujifilm type of kit. If you are in the market for your very first Fujifilm camera, this bundle would serve as an excellent all-in-one starting point.

The camera I chose for this bundle is the Fujifilm X-T50. It’s simple and fun enough for beginners, yet sophisticated and capable enough for advanced users—in other words, the camera will keep up with you as you grow. No matter where you are on your photographic journey—from brand-new hobbyist to experienced pro—the Fujifilm X-T50 is an excellent camera, so it’s easy to recommend. The silver version is my favorite, so that’s what I chose for the bundle.

“Fuji X Weekly is an amazing resource for photography enthusiasts, especially those diving into the world of Fujifilm. Created by Ritchie Roesch, Fuji X Weekly has become the go-to for Fujifilm photographers looking to explore their camera’s potential. Known for its collection of Film Simulation Recipes, Fuji X Weekly empowers users to recreate the iconic looks of classic film stocks directly in their cameras without the need for post-processing. This bundle celebrates the creativity that Fuji X Weekly represents and is picked by Ritchie to offer you a perfect starting point to explore the Fujifilm system and capture stunning images with ease.”

—Wex Photo Video

What’s a camera without a lens? The Fujinon 35mm f/2 is one of my favorites. It’s small, lightweight, optically excellent, and affordable. I’ve owned this lens for a long time, and still use it regularly. On X-series cameras, because of the APS-C crop factor, it’s a “nifty-fifty” standard prime, something every photographer should have, and the perfect lens for learning composition. The silver version of the Fujinon 35mm f/2 looks strikingly good on the silver X-T50.

To complete the kit, included is a spare NP-W126S battery, SanDisk Extreme 256GB SD Card, and SmallRig Leather Half Case. A memory card is essential to get started, and this SanDisk is one that I personally have in a few of my cameras. The extra battery isn’t essential, but very nice to have—especially for traveling—so I wanted it included. The SmallRig Half Case adds a little style and extra protection.

Altogether, these five items—silver Fujifilm X-T50 camera, silver Fujinon 23mm f/2 lens, spare battery, 256GB SD Card, and leather half case—is an excellent kit for someone just getting started with Fujifilm. With this bundle, you’re good to go—there’s nothing else you need to buy to begin your photographic journey.

This Fuji X Weekly + Wex Photo Video collaborative bundle is not available anywhere else. Fujifilm doesn’t offer the X-T50 and 35mm f/2 as a kit (they should!). The only place you can get these bundled together is at Wex. Right now, this kit is only £1,661.90 (about $2,100 USD). The MSRP for these five items, if purchased separately, is £1,841.90; however, because the X-T50 and 35mm lens are currently on sale, the price is £180 less. There’s no extra discount for purchasing these items together; this is meant to simplify the purchasing process for someone in the market for their first Fujifilm camera.

Fuji X Weekly + Wex Photo Video Fujifilm X-T50 Collaborative Bundle
Included:
– Silver Fujifilm X-T50 camera
– Silver Fujinon 35mm f/2 lens
– Spare NP-W126S battery
– SanDisk 256GB SD Card
– Small Rig Leather Half Case

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

See also:
Fujifilm X-T50 — The “Digital Film” Camera — But who is it for?
Fujifilm X-T50 Film Dial Settings + 14 New Film Simulation Recipes
Putting the Film Dial to Practice — Four Cities with the Fujifilm X-T50

Find nearly 400 Film Simulation Recipes for Fujifilm cameras in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

Fujifilm Grain Comparison: GFX100S II vs. X-T5

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Unfair Comparisons – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Astia Summer

I’m planning to do a number of comparison tests between the JPEGs from the Fujifilm GFX100S II and my X-series models, like the Fujifilm X-T5. What’s different? What’s the same? I haven’t come to very many conclusions yet. There’s clearly a difference, but it seems so subtle it is tough to put a finger on what exactly is divergent.

For this article, I’m comparing the faux Grain between the GFX100S II and the X-T5. This isn’t a carefully controlled scientific test. When my wife (on the X-T5) and I (on the GFX100S II) captured these images, we did not intend for them to be used in any sort of comparison test. I chose these because they were made in the same location (White Sands National Park in New Mexico). They were captured with the new Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired Recipe, and reprocessed in-camera with the Astia Summer Recipe. I chose those two Recipes because of their Grain: Weak/Small and Strong/Large.

Fujifilm X-T5 – Astia Summer – Grain Weak/Small
Fujifilm GFX100S II – Astia Summer – Grain Weak/Small
Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired – Grain Strong/Large
Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired – Grain Strong/Large

You cannot tell much at all from the above photos. From examining the pictures more closely, I can state that the size of the faux grain is a little larger in the X-T5 JPEGs than the GFX100S II, but you can’t really tell without cropping in. So let’s crop in!

In the first set (identified simply by “Crop”), I’ve made the pictures roughly the same size. If you look carefully, the Weak/Small Grain is slightly more visible in the X-T5 pictures, but it’s not overtly obvious. In the second set (identified by “Bigger Crop”), I’ve tried to match the Grain, and I had to crop much more deeply on the GFX100S II pictures to do so. These are significant crops, and you’d have to print large to view them this big. I think if a Grain size Medium existed on GFX, that would more closely match Grain size Small on the X-series.

Crop – Fujifilm X-T5 – Astia Summer – Grain Weak/Small
Crop – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Astia Summer – Grain Weak/Small
Bigger Crop – Fujifilm X-T5 – Astia Summer – Grain Weak/Small
Bigger Crop – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Astia Summer – Grain Weak/Small

Below is a repeat, except for with Strong/Large Grain. I think if a Grain size Medium existed on the X-T5, it would more closely match Grain size Large on the GFX100S II.

Crop – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired – Grain Strong/Large
Crop – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired – Grain Strong/Large
Bigger Crop – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired – Grain Strong/Large
Bigger Crop – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired – Grain Strong/Large

I don’t know that it makes any practical real-world difference, but the size of the Grain—whether Small or Large—is not identical on GFX as it is on X-series cameras. It’s not scaled the same. It’s smaller on GFX and larger on X-series, specifically when comparing the 100mp images from the GFX100S II to the 40mp images from the X-T5. There are also likely variances between the 26mp APS-C sensor and the 50mp GFX sensor.

The way to look at this, I suppose, is that film grain appears more fine on medium-format film than 35mm. The difference in silver grain between—say—120 film and Advanced Photo System Type-C film is much, much more significant than the difference in Grain between GFX and X. I think you’d expect the Grain to be more “fine” on GFX—and that’s what you find—but it isn’t nearly as much of a difference as with actual film.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X-T5 in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T5 in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex, Nuzira
Fujifilm GFX100S II:
Amazon, B&H, Wex

Possible Fujifilm Film Camera Coming??

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

In a recent interview, Theo Georghiades, general manager of Fujifilm Imaging Solutions UK, told Amateur Photographer that there is a possibility of a Fujifilm film camera coming in the future. Some have called this a “bombshell revelation”, but is it really?

Theo was asked, “Would Fujifilm ever consider launching a film camera again, especially if it had the retro look of an X100VI?”

He responded, “I’ve been with Fujifilm for 25 years, so have learned to never say never—but I don’t know. There is without doubt a massive resurgence in film as we see from film sales. Go down to the markets around Westminster in London and you can see the popularity of film cameras again. And it’s the same in Japan, as I found on a recent trip. As I say, I’ve learned to never, ever say never! However, any business needs to analyze the prospects for a long-term opportunity over a short-term fad.”

I’m not sure how some have interpreted this to mean Fujifilm is in development of a film camera (outside of Instax), but some have insinuated that. Others are taking a more pragmatic interpretation, that Fujifilm simply hasn’t shut the door on a film camera, which is probably the more accurate analysis.

Photography in the ’80’s – Fujifilm X-T30 – Kodacolor Recipe

My guess is that Theo was speaking off-the-cuff, and didn’t mean to make any official statements on this topic. In other words, a large grain of salt should be taken. Perhaps there has been water-cooler talk of the possibility, perhaps not even that. I think he is simply saying that Fujifilm does unexpected things sometimes, so you just never know what they might do in the future, but there are no current plans at this time.

If I were Fujifilm, this is what I would do: rerelease the Fujica Compact Deluxe. They already have the designs. Maybe modernize the light meter, but mostly it should stay the same. I’m sure it would sell well enough to justify manufacturing it. But time is of the essence, so if they want to do this, they should be quick about it. If they hesitate, the market for 35mm film cameras might decrease by the time it hits the shelves. You’ve got to ride the waves while they’re high and before they crash.

Fujifilm currently makes “digital film” cameras, which isn’t the same thing, but in some ways it’s better. In my opinion, the X-series bridges the gap between the positive aspects of both film and digital photography. It’s still apples-to-oranges, and I’m not suggesting otherwise, but there is enough crossover that it’s worth pointing out, and even celebrating. I have no idea whether or not Fujifilm will release a 35mm film camera, but I’m extremely happy with my X-series gear. Still, it would be really cool if they did make a brand-new film camera, so I hope they do.

Firmware Updates for Fujifilm X-T5, X-T50, X100VI, X-S20 & GFX100S II

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm released a new set of firmware updates, which they had promised would come before the end of the year: one for the X-T5, one for the X-T50, one for the X100VI, one for the X-S20, and one for the GFX100S II. This is simply an autofocus fix for the bug introduced earlier in the year that was partially fixed already, and should be fully fixed now. Unlike the firmware updates last month for the X-H2s, X-H2, and GFX100 II, this one doesn’t include F-Log2 C or some of the other improvements that were given to those cameras, only the AF fix. It’s possible those things might still come in a future firmware update, but I’m not sure.

I haven’t yet updated any of my cameras, because I always like to wait awhile—you never know if there will be some unexpected issue. For example, Sony famously released a firmware update earlier this year that cost their customers $700 to fix. A good rule of thumb is to wait a week or two to see if any issues arise. Most of the time there is not an issue, and I don’t suspect any problems with this one specifically, but since it does happen every once in awhile, it’s prudent to wait at least a few days, and if something major comes up, it should be well known by then.

I’m sure that you’ve read about the AF woes somewhere, or seen a YouTube video or two about it; however, in my opinion it has been largely overblown and misunderstood. Let me explain why.

First, most people weren’t affected. Some were, for sure, but not the majority; however, the large vocal outcry caused a bit of hysteria, which made it seem like a much bigger issue than it actually was—essentially, trolls took over the Fujifilm corner of the internet for awhile. A few different people told me something to the effect of, “I didn’t know my camera was broken until I saw it demonstrated on a YouTube video, and now I’m mad because I paid a lot of money for it.” It didn’t affect them personally and they would have never known without someone telling them, but since they did know, they were pissed. A lot of people got angry over something that had no negative implications for them personally, only the idea that it possibly could.

Second, Fujifilm’s AF can perform very different depending on the specific lenses used and the specific settings programmed, and if you are using lenses and/or settings that are not ideal for the specific situation, you might get less than ideal results. An example of this comes courtesy of Camera Conspiracies, as Kasey discovered that his prior criticisms of Fujifilm’s AF—including the bug—were at least partially user-error by him. I suspect that is true of a lot of the criticisms, but people tend to get offended when you suggest that the gear isn’t the primary problem. Perhaps something can be said of the intuitiveness of the AF system—there’s certainly room for improvement—however, a lot of the blame that was directed at the camera wasn’t fully the camera’s fault, but largely the lens and/or setting choices made by the one using it.

Third (and this is related to second), some people seem to want AF to automatically focus precisely as they wish it would without any input from the user. It’s like if you put your exposure triangle into full-auto, and then complained that it didn’t choose the specific aperture, shutter speed, or ISO that you wished it had. Autofocus doesn’t necessarily mean that you should set-and-forget it; like with the exposure triangle, a little control can go a long ways. After all, we’re photographers, not merely button pushers. I see people all of the time create wonderful images and videos with the gear that supposedly has sucky AF, and it isn’t a limiting factor for them (proving that it isn’t sucky after all). As Ansel Adams famously stated, “The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it.”

Fourth, I think some people have unrealistic expectations of how Fujifilm’s AF should perform, ignoring that the Canikony brands have been developing autofocus systems since the 1960’s and ’70’s, have significantly larger R&D budgets for it, and have even prioritized AF over image quality in recent years. Of course theirs is better, but that does not mean Fujifilm’s AF is bad, because it is not—far from it. If you could take any current Fujifilm model back in time 15 years, you’d shock the camera world with seemingly impossible technology. Photography has been around for nearly 200 years, and videography for over 135 years, and not just since the invention of our incredibly capable modern gear. People created amazing photos and videos in the past with their subpar gear (as compared to what is available today), so literally nothing should stop you from doing so with your superior gear. If something is stopping you, it is only you, and you have the power to change that.

Thankfully, Fujifilm’s AF has been fully fixed. Can it be improved? Sure, just like everything else, there is always room for improvement (there is no such thing as a perfect camera). Those who continue to moan about it are either haters, constant complainers, or trolls, or they are experiencing user-error and are blaming the gear instead of themselves. It’s beyond time for all that negativity to end—I’m sick of it, and I know a lot of other people are, too. Let’s get back to enjoying our gear, and creating awesome content with it.

Selling and Trading my Unwanted Gear

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Over the years I have accumulated quite a collection of photography gear. I have cameras and lenses that I rarely—if ever—use. They’re on my shelf collecting dust, or packed away in a box. I’ve been meaning to get rid of some of these items, but I just never seem to get around to it.

The number one reason why I hold onto my old, unused gear is not because I want to keep it, but because I dislike the process of selling. Over the years I have used sites like Craigslist, eBay, Facebook Marketplace, and even Instagram Stories to sell my stuff, but it has rarely been an easy and smooth process. I’ve been ghosted more times than I can count, and even scammed a couple of times. It’s such a headache!

I want to be transparent upfront: MPB is the sponsor of this article. If you don’t know it yet, they are the largest global platform to buy, sell and trade used photo and video gear—each piece checked by hand before being MPB Approved. MPB asked me to create a series of articles sharing my honest opinion about using gear loaned from their platform (you can find the links at the bottom of this article). 

A couple of weeks back, they asked me about testing the selling and trading process for myself—and since I’d been putting off selling my old gear to raise funds for a camera I had my eye on, I jumped at the suggestion to try (fingers crossed) an easier way. It is important to note that they didn’t give me any special treatment or pricing. So while I have purchased from MPB a couple of times in the past, this article is about my experience going through the sell and trade process as a normal customer for the first time. Free, fast, and fair is how they describe their instant quote process, so let’s put that to the test.

I had three items that I no longer needed: My Fujifilm X-M1, Fujinon 100-400mm lens, and Canon EOS 5DS R. For the X-M1, I wanted to trade for a Fujinon TCL-X100 II Conversion Lens, which MPB had loaned to me back in October. For the zoom lens and Canon DSLR, I wanted cash. I did this in two separate transactions—one trade, and one sell.

How to sell with MPB

When you visit the MPB platform, you are presented with a path choice: “Shop” or “Sell/Trade”. When you click “Sell/Trade”, you are prompted to provide information about the gear you’re looking to sell—what exactly is it, and what is the condition it’s in (there’s even a quick guide if you’re not sure how). After that, you just select “Get Instant Quote”, provide some basic information (name, email, and optionally your phone number), and MPB presents you with a tentative offer. All quick, easy, and painless.

For my Fujifilm X-M1, since I was planning to trade, I added the TCL-X100 II lens to the Buying category, selected my desired cosmetic condition, and chose the specific one that I wanted to trade for. When I clicked “Get Instant Quote”, I was presented with a price for the X-M1 that was well above what I had anticipated being offered—I didn’t expect so much! I added some batteries and accessories to the trade, and still had ample cash leftover. The next step was to box up the camera, and ship it for free via FedEx. I should note that trading gear doesn’t increase or decrease the price of whatever you are buying or selling.

A few days later I received an email from MPB that my item was received. The next day another email came stating that my item had been inspected, and my quote updated. They reduced the amount they wanted to pay for it by a little and I could either accept or reject it. I had the option to reject the offer and get my gear returned for free if I wasn’t happy, but I accepted. It was still more than I had anticipated, and there was still cash leftover after the trade. I provided MPB with banking info, and two days later I was paid. Just yesterday, the TCL-X100 II, batteries, and accessories arrived in the mail, and I couldn’t be happier with the whole process.

Next, I went through the same process to sell my Fujinon 100-400mm lens and Canon 5DS R camera; however, the quote for these two items were both less than I had hoped for. I needed them gone fast, so I decided to send them in anyway. When MPB reviewed the lens and camera, they once again adjusted the quote, this time significantly increasing the value of the Canon DSLR. It was still less than I would have liked to have sold them for, but the overall increase made me feel a little better about it. I later learned they use MPB Re.Value—the world’s leading proprietary dynamic pricing engine for used camera gear with millions of data points—to provide real-time prices for buyers and sellers.

I was curious how much of a markup MPB would give my items (after all, they’ve got to earn a profit), so I found them on their website. The X-M1 has a markup of $149, which seems quite reasonable. The Fujinon 100-400mm has a markup of $339, and the Canon EOS 5DS R has a markup of $333, which leans in their favor. You could say that I left money on the table, had I sold these items myself instead of using MPB, but that’s assuming I would have been able to sell them for that price, and that I wouldn’t have had to pay shipping and other fees. Add to that the time and hassle of doing it, plus the risk of being scammed or worse, and I would say that selling to MPB was undoubtedly preferable.

After selling gear through MPB for the first time, I’ve learned that it’s a quick, easy, and painless process. While I would have liked to have received a little more for two of the three items that I sold, overall I am pleased with the outcome, and I will certainly use MPB again in the future.

See also:
Fujifilm X-Pro2 — The camera that got away (again)
Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm F/2 = Interchangeable-Lens Fujifilm X100VI??
Leica Q2 from the perspective of a Fujifilm photographer
Fujifilm X30 — Fujifilm’s Forgotten Retro Compact Zoom
Close Up with the Fujinon XF 30mm F/2.8 R LM WR Macro
Traveling Light with the Fujifilm X100VI + WCL-X100 II & TCL-X100 II Conversion Lenses
Your Gift Guide for Affordable Fujifilm Gear