Fujirumors recently conducted a survey of the “best” and “worst” Fujifilm-related gear released in 2025. This included Fujifilm cameras—specifically, the X-E5, X-T30 III, X half, GFX100RF, and GFX Eterna 55—as well as lenses, including third-party lenses. Instax was in the list, too. The survey had two questions: which was the best, and which was the worst. The insinuation in the body of the article was that whatever product was chosen as the “worst” would be considered a flop.
No surprise to me, the Fujifilm X-E5 was ranked as the “best” Fujifilm-related product of 2025, receiving nearly 40% of the votes. It’s an excellent camera that’s been pretty well received. A strong argument can be made that the GFX100RF or Eterna 55 are technically the best, but the majority of those voting are likely not in the GFX system. The X-T30 III will probably end up selling more copies than any of the other cameras, which doesn’t necessarily make it the “best” only the best selling due to having the best value. It’s all subjective.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
The Fujifilm X half far and away received the most votes for “worst” Fujifilm-related product, receiving 50% of the responses. I’m not surprised because the survey was on Fujirumors, and the X half is largely not intended for the market that audience generally is. Just like I’d be shocked if the Instax Mini LiPlay won best product on that site, while it wouldn’t be shocking at all if it did so on an Instax-centric website.
The primary customers of the X half are not those in X-series; it’s those with an Instax camera, those who shoot film on a retro point-and-shoot, those who like digicams, and those who have an interest in photography but have no interest in using a mirrorless or DSLR model. They want film-like results without fuss. I would bet that two-thirds of those who have bought an X half don’t own and have never owned an X-series camera, aside from their new X half. If we were to revisit this in a couple of years, I would wager that the X half was the gateway into the X-series for thousands of people, which is exactly what the purpose of that camera is. Someone buys the X half today, next year they buy an X-T30 III or X100VI or something like that.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
The question, of course, is this: does that make the X half the worst Fujifilm-related product of 2025? If it’s successful at bringing in new customers, particularly an often overlook subset of potential customers, isn’t that good? I don’t know exactly how well the X half is or isn’t selling, especially since those statistics are hard to come by. Apparently, it was the number one selling camera in Japan over the summer, significantly outselling the second most popular. After talking with a few different camera stores, it seems to be doing well, but the camera is not nearly as hot as the X100VI or even the X-E5. I hear that it’s more popular in Asian markets than in Europe or America, so maybe that explains it.
I can tell you this: I have an X half, and it was my most-used camera on an RV roadtrip up the Atlantic coast over the summer. It’s fun for casual snapshots, and was perfect for documenting our journey. My wifeand I both use it, and sometimes we fight over it. With that said, it will never replace my X-T5 or X-E5 or X100VI or any other model. It’s not that type of camera. It’s going to give you the “worst” image quality of any current X-series model, but in the best way possible. So maybe it is the worst Fujifilm-related product, but that’s what makes it great. And it’s definitely not a flop, it’s just intended for a different group of people than the usual suspects, which certainly can be a great way to expand market share.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
I’ve never been a staunch advocate of In Body Image Stabilization (IBIS). For the 25+ years that I’ve been creating photographs, only in the last four or five years have I even owned a camera with IBIS, and it has had only a minimal effect on my photography. So I’ve had a take it or leave it attitude towards it—nice to have sometimes, but far from essential. Nowadays, most of my cameras have built-in stabilization, including my X-E5, X-T5, X100VI, GFX100S II, X-T4 ES, Ricoh GR IV, and more. I still have many without IBIS, including an X-E4, X-T30, X100V, and some others. Yes, I own way too many cameras.
For the most part, the inclusion or exclusion of stabilization hasn’t had any significant impact on my photography. I’m not much of a videographer; if I were, I’d want IBIS—in fact, my wife is a videographer, and IBIS is essential for her. With that said, I know of several people who have done amazing video work on non-stabilized cameras. If I used long telephoto lenses, I’d want IBIS. I used to own the Fujinon 100-400mm, but I rarely used it, so I sold it—for that lens, IBIS can be helpful. The longer the lens, the more camera shake is exaggerated, and the more important IBIS is for handheld photography; the wider the lens, the less you need the camera to be stabilized.
Fujifilm X100V at 1/3 second exposure handheld
The picture above is nothing special, but, at 1/3 second, I do believe it is the longest I’ve successfully handheld a non-IBIS camera. The leaf shutter in the X100V certainly helped, but mostly I just utilized good techniques, including bracing myself and slowly exhaling as I lightly pressed the shutter release button, which was set on a two-second self-timer. It took several tries to get one sharp result. It was more work than that particular picture was worth, but it does demonstrate that the lack of IBIS isn’t necessarily a major deal.
Aside from that, I could always carry a tripod with me. Even a monopod will potentially offer the stabilization necessary for slow shutter speeds, but a tripod ensures the camera is perfectly still and I’ll get a sharp picture. Before I had cameras with IBIS, I would usually use a tripod for any shutter speed as long as or longer than half the reciprocal focal length of the lens. For example, with a 50mm lens, I can, with good techniques, get a sharp photo as slow as 1/30; anything slower than that needs a tripod. Even in that example, using 1/30th shutter speed with the 50mm lens is definitely pushing the envelope of what I can do, and it might depend on how much coffee I’ve had that day. If the lens is wider, the shutter speed can be slower. For a 12mm lens, 1/8 might not need a tripod, but 1/6 probably does.
I hate carrying tripods. Especially when traveling, or if I have to hike somewhere, the last thing I want is a tripod. When I was younger, carrying a tripod was less of a big deal (and I’m sure they were heavier back then, too), but now that I’m in my mid-40’s, it’s annoying, and I’d rather avoid it. That’s where IBIS comes in handy. I can go slower and not think twice about it. I don’t have to utilize crazy techniques. I can leave the tripod at home, and just enjoy photography—the camera will take care of my shakiness.
So even though I’m not a big IBIS advocate, and it’s still a feature that 99% of the time I see as nonessential for me, it can certainly be quite handy. It was definitely nice to have on my recent trip to The Great Smoky Mountains National Park, where I utilized it a number of times for flowing streams and waterfall pictures. I don’t think that every camera needs to have IBIS; however, when I’m packing my camera bag for an adventure, if I think I might be shooting in low-light situations or want a slow shutter speed for effect, you better believe that at least one of my bodies will be stabilized. Having at least one camera with IBIS is good to have.
Fujifilm’s Film Dial is probably the third most controversial design decision from the brand. First is the entirety of the X half camera, which has a vertically orientated sensor and frame advance lever. Second is the backwards-mounted rear LCD on the X-Pro3. Unlike the other controversies, the Film Dial is not just found on one model, but three (soon to be four) with certainly more to come in the future. With these contentious features, it’s understandable that people have mixed reactions.
Some people love the Film Dial. Some people could take-it-or-leave-it and its inclusion or exclusion is unimportant. Some people don’t mind it, but would prefer a different dial instead. And some people just loathe it.
Fujifilm had sent me an X-T50 to try out prior to its announcement. I didn’t know what the Film Dial was—it looked cool, but how do you use it? Initially, I didn’t really like it. I shoot with Film Simulation Recipes, and most Recipes work well with one specific Film Simulation and not nearly as well with others. Since the Film Dial (except on the X-E5… we’ll get to that later) only changes the Film Simulation and nothing else, it seemed like a useless feature to my photography. But then I had an epiphany: what if there was a “universal” Recipeor two, which was specifically designed for use with any and all Film Simulations? The Film Dial would become an important tool for maximizing in-camera picture aesthetics. So I went from disliking it to loving it rather quickly.
I think some of the criticisms are valid. Is a Film Dial more useful than a Drive Dial or ISO Dial? Fujifilm has never replaced an ISO Dial with a Film Dial, and I hope they never do. Complaining that a Film Dial was implemented instead of an ISO Dial is a little silly since the camera lines in question never had an ISO Dial in the first place. Still, of the two potential knobs, many people would prefer ISO over Film Simulation, and perhaps that is something Fujifilm should take into consideration. Fujifilm has replaced the Drive Dial with the Film Dial, and, for those who commonly use the Drive Dial, I can see how that might be annoying. Instead of a knob on top, Drive is now a button like on the X-E, X100, and X-Pro series. Most ideal might be to use a dual knob like the ISO/Drive dial on the X-T series (except Film Simulations instead of ISO), but Fujifilm hasn’t tried that yet—who knows, they might at some point. I don’t think this is a big deal for most people, but it is understandable. There was a similar sentiment when the four-way D-Pad was removed on most models, and it turned out that the majority acclimated without much heartache. My guess is that the lack of a Drive Knob on certain models will prove to be rather trivial in the long run.
The majority of complaints are from the loathers. They really hate the Film Dial and don’t even want to see it when they look at their camera. It bothers them deeply. Some even claim that they’ll leave the brand over its inclusion. It’s like kryptonite or something. I find this very, very strange. It’s weird. The main issue seems to be that the Film Dial is something they’d never, ever use. They dislike Film Simulations so much that they don’t want anyone to even think that they might (gasp!) use one. Of course the irony is that, outside of some drastic measures, they’re using one: Provia. That’s how their camera sees the world, and where their RAW edits begin. Yes, they can manipulate the files any which way and make any number of unique adjustments, but you have to admit that using Provia has at least a small influence over the final edited photo. Almost all of the Film Simulation haters are using a Film Simulation if they shoot a Fujifilm camera, but they’re either ignorant to that fact or they’re fully aware and are just being dishonest.
For (nearly) the last 15 years, many people have been buying and using Fujifilm cameras without digging into the menus, and as such never ventured beyond the Provia/STD Film Simulation. I’ve had a number of people tell me this. They’ve owned many Fujifilm cameras over the years, and never bothered to change the various IQ Menu items like Film Simulation, Dynamic Range, Color, etc., etc., until recently. When people say that they don’t use Film Simulations, what they often mean is that they’ve never tried anything other than Provia. They don’t know what they’re missing, and perhaps they don’t realize that it can be beneficial to their photography.
For example, a strictly RAW photographer might dismiss Film Simulations (and only use Provia), but not realize that a different Film Simulation might help them to better pre-visualize the shot. Perhaps a different Film Simulation is a closer aesthetic match to their style, and seeing the scene in those colors might help them, and maybe even improve their photography. I know of several photographers—some fairly well known—that use Recipes for this purpose. They’re not JPEG photographers—they RAW edit, and a couple even sell Lightroom presets—but the Recipes help them to visualize the finished photo while in the field, which helps them produce better pictures. Those who dismiss Film Simulations forfeit this great tool.
There’s no right or wrong way to do photography. There’s no right or wrong way to use Film Simulations or Recipes (I’m surprised sometimes how people use Recipes, occasionally in very unexpected ways). Do what works best for you, whatever that is. If you only ever want to use Provia and factory-default IQ settings, that’s cool. I just don’t understand the disdain that some have for the other Film Sims, and (more importantly) for those who appreciate them. There shouldn’t be such hate. There are some buttons that I never use on some of my cameras, and I don’t look at those buttons with disgust or think less than of people who do use them—it would be ridiculous of me to do so. How silly and strange would that be! Yet there are people who do just that when it comes to the Film Dial, and are very open about it, plastering it across the internet.
A long-time Fujifilm photographer told me recently that he never bothered with the various Film Simulations because he shoots RAW and didn’t see the point in trying them. Then he purchased a Fujifilm X-T50. Seeing the Film Dial on the top of the camera made him curious, so he began to try the different Film Sims, and he realized that he likes some more than Provia, especially Classic Negative. Eventually this led him to find Film Simulation Recipes, and he begun shooting JPEGs for the first time. He told me that none of this would have happened if the camera had a Drive Dial instead of a Film Dial. That’s why Fujifilm is putting one of their greatest assets—their amazing in-camera profiles—right on top of their cameras for all to see, and super convenient to use. It was such a great move by the brand.
The Film Dial isn’t perfect, though. First, the X-T50 and X-M5 (along with the upcoming X-T30 III) should have the ability to save Recipes into FS1, FS2, and FS3, just like the Fujifilm X-E5. I really hope Fujifilm does that. Second, why can’t all of the Film Simulations on the Film Dial have the ability to save Recipes? I should be able to program a Provia Recipe, a Velvia Recipe, an Astia Recipe, a Classic Chrome Recipe, etc., etc., into the various slots on the dial. That would be strongly welcomed by a large portion of Fujifilm’s customers. Third, Classic Negative was inexplicably left off the X-E5 Film Dial; I know that not every Film Simulation can make the cut, but Classic Negative should have been included. There’s room for improvement, and I think Fujifilm is working towards making it better.
Personally, I like the Film Dial and appreciate seeing it on more and more cameras. It can be quite useful, especially when paired with a “universal” Recipe. And it will only improve with time. Those who complain about the Film Dial, there’s validity to some of the criticisms and Fujifilm should ponder those; however, some criticisms are just plain silly. Those who say that it’s dumb or garbage or makes them feel sick or want to change brands—I just don’t get it. Nobody said that you have to use the Film Dial (simply keep it set to C), or even that you have to buy a camera with a Film Dial. Nobody is forcing you to do it. And the world doesn’t revolve around you, anyway. People use cameras in all sorts of ways, and all of those ways are valid. Fujifilm has no obligation to make a camera for your preferences and your preferences alone. To think otherwise is strange and narcissistic. The Film Dial is not kryptonite, and you’re not Superman. It can be a useful tool if you take a moment to figure out how to best utilize it for your photographic circumstances—even if you’re a strictly RAW shooter who dislikes Film Simulations, it can be used to your advantage. For the JPEG photographer, it adds significant straight-out-of-camera aesthetic versatility. In other words, the Film Dial is awesome! I think it’s quite smart for Fujifilm to prominently place it on particular cameras, like the X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5.
The sun is beginning to set on Fujifilm’s fifth-generation of X-series cameras. Soon, dawn will break on X-Trans VI. This is a much-too-early speculation on what that might look like. In other words, take all of this with a massive grain of salt, because these are merely guesses. I don’t have any inside information. Many of my prior guesses were completely wrong, but a few were spot on—I anticipate that many of these will prove to be incorrect, too, but that some will turn out to be right.
I don’t know with certainty that the upcoming Fujifilm X-T30 III will be the final fifth-generation camera. The X-T30 II was the last fourth-generation model. The X-E series has often marked the end of a generation by being the second-to-last model. So with the recent release of the Fujifilm X-E5, and the upcoming announcement of the X-T30 III, I think it’s a pretty safe bet that the fifth-generation is coming to a close, and that the sixth-generation is right around the corner.
To start with, let’s talk about a potential timeline. I think the first sixth-generation camera will be the X-Pro5 (maybe they’ll call it X-Pro4), and it will be announced in January or February, and ship in February or March. After that will be the X-H3 and X-H3s, which will come in late-spring and/or summer. I’m going to go way out on a limb, and say that an X80 (followup to the X70) will come in fall of 2026. If this all happens, next year will be a busy year for the X-series.
In 2027, I see the X-T6 arriving in late-winter or early-spring. The X-S30 will likely follow in the summer or fall. I suspect there will be a GFX release or two, but that’s it for the X-series for that year. In 2028, I anticipate the X100VII in late-winter or early-spring, followed by the X-T60 in late-spring or early-summer, and the X-M5 in the fall. 2029 will wind down the sixth-generation, with an X-HF2 (not X-Trans, but technically X-series) early in the year and an X-E6 later in the year. There will not be a followup to the X-T30 III. It’s possible that the seventh-generation of X-Trans kicks off towards the end of 2029, possibly with an Eterna 28 (APS-C version of the GFX Eterna 55) cinema camera.
A lot will look the same between X-Trans V and X-Trans VI, as it will be mainly under-the-hood changes. I don’t anticipate any major resolution bump with X-Trans VI; I think it will be more about speed and efficiency. Will Fujifilm continue to use the same sensors? They might. I can see a partially stacked 40mp sensor in the X-Pro3, X-H2, X-T6, and maybe X100VII. I can see them using the 40mp X-Trans V sensor (but paired with a new processor) in the X-T60, X-E6, and maybe X100VII (the X100VII could go either way between non-stacked and partially stacked). I don’t think that the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor will be used any longer, but a new sensor (maybe 30mp) will be added to the lineup, found in the X80, X-S30, and X-M5. The X-H3s might continue to use the same 26mp stacked X-Trans V sensor, or it might have a new-and-improved stacked sensor.
My guess is that the X-Pro5 will have an aspect ratio dial like the GFX100RF, and will be the first X-series model with the XPan aspect ratio. It will probably have the classic EVF feature like the X-E5. It might even have a Film Dial like the X-E5. I really don’t know what else will be different, but I suspect there will be a few surprises. The X-H3s will be a lot like the X-H2s, but with some speed/efficiency improvements plus the ability to use video LUTs like the Eterna 55. The X-H3 will be a lot like the X-H2, but mainly just speed/efficiency improvements. The X80—if Fujifilm decides to make it—will be a massive success, and will serve as Fujifilm’s closest competitor to the Ricoh GR IV.
The X-T6 will be a lot like the X-T5, with mainly just speed and efficiency upgrades. The X-S30 will have a new sensor, I believe, that will boost the resolution a smidge; overall, I don’t think it will be much different than the X-S20. The X100VII will have a new-and-improved lens that can better take full advantage of the 40mp sensor, but otherwise will be quite similar to the X100VII. It could have an X-E5-like Film Dial, too. The X-T60 won’t be a whole lot different than the X-T50, just small improvements. The X-M6 will likely have a new sensor, but otherwise won’t be much different than the X-M5. The X-HF2 will have a hotshoe and/or better flash, but will still be pretty much the same. The X-E6, which might just be called the X-E5s, will just see some small improvements, like Classic Negative added to the Film Dial, and other minor refreshes.
There will probably be two new Film Simulations added: one beginning with the X-Pro5, and another with the X100VII. Some potential Film Sim ideas are Fujicolor PRO 400H emulation that turns pastel with overexposure, Natura (modeled after Natura 1600), Fortia (more vibrant than Velvia), Cross Process (modeled after Velvia 50 that’s been cross processed), Instax, and a more contrasty B&W option. I think they will add a couple more JPEG options, too. I’d like to see Halation Effect (with the options of Off, Weak, Strong) and Light Leak (Off, Intermittent, On), which Fujifilm has already invented, they just need to incorporate. Faded black and vignetting are a couple other options worth considering. They should revamp the Advanced Filters, adding Retro and Expired Film from the X half, and allow Dynamic Range, White Balance, and Grain to be selected. There’s a lot that Fujifilm could do, but a suspect it will be limited to a couple of new Film Simulations, a couple of new JPEG options, and maybe some long-overdue improvements to the Advanced Filters.
Essentially, I think the sixth-generation will look a lot like the fifth, with mostly under-the-hood improvements. If Fujifilm has ever considered releasing an X80, they should probably do so sooner than later; if they do, that camera will be the X-Trans VI headliner. The X-Pro5 will probably be the most different compared to its predecessor. My guess is that there will not be an X-T30 IV or X-T40—the X-T30 III will be the final iteration of that camera; however, they will continue to sell it well into the sixth-generation lifecycle, quietly discontinuing it 2028. Of course, all of this is speculation. Fujifilm could certainly surprise us with all sorts of things—they’ve done it before, and they’ll do it again. A lot seems pretty predictable, though; however, we should expect the unexpected, at least here and there.
Me, at Create With Us, During Setup – Minneapolis, MN – Fujifilm X-E5 – 1970’s Summer
I returned home late last night from Fujifilm’s Create With Us event in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This was their third annual Create With Us—I was fortunate to be at the last one, too, which was in Austin, Texas. It was a very quick trip: I flew out Saturday evening, and the returning flight landed just before midnight on Sunday. It was a whirlwind, but I’m so glad that I got to be a part of it.
Fujifilm assigned me three jobs: assist with a Fujifilm X-E5 and X-T50 touch-and-try station, cohost a Tech Talk with Christopher Gilbert, and lead a photowalk. The topic of the Tech Talk was straight-out-of-camera photography. Christopher and I discussed the various Film Simulations, how to set up a Film Simulation Recipe in the camera, and how to reprocess a RAW file using the in-camera RAW converter. It was a fun experience, and hopefully educational for those in the audience (the next Tech Talk is on Wednesday, October 1st).
The photowalk was great. It was supposed to be limited to 15 attendees, plus myself and two assistants (someone from Fujifilm, and a local photographer), and two models. We ended up with over 25 people in total (including myself, the two assistants, and the two models). The new Fujifilm North America CEO Ryuichi “Richie” Matoba (forgive me if his official title is not exactly that) also attended. He was the CEO of Fujifilm Australia, but as of a month ago Richie was given the reins of the North America office. It was an incredible honor to have him join the photowalk! I didn’t get a chance to talk much with him, but I would love an opportunity for a longer conversation (I have a lot of feedback and ideas), should he happen to read this.
It was an honor to photograph with and meet in-person all those who attended the photowalk. The two models were great, too. I’m grateful for those who stopped by the touch-and-try booth to say hello. It was a really good event, and I’m sure all who attended can attest to that. If there’s ever a Create With Us event near you in the future, be sure to attend—it’s well worth whatever effort it takes to get there.
The only camera I brought with me was my Fujifilm X-E5. This is such a great travel camera, and for a quick there-and-back adventure, I really didn’t need anything else. I especially appreciate that you can program up to 11 Recipes into the X-E5. I attached the new Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 pancake lens to the camera, and also brought along a Pentax-110 50mm f/2.8 lens and adapter for a second option. One spare battery, which I didn’t even use, rounded out the kit.
Probably the most interesting thing that I learned at Create With Us was from a somewhat off-handed comment from a Fujifilm employee. It would have been really easy to overlook what was said. I don’t think it was intended to be interpreted as an official statement, but I was fascinated by it, so I want to share it with you: “Each sensor generation has its own unique charm. Some people like the Provia rendering of X-Trans I, some people like the Velvia rendering of X-Trans II—each one is different.” I might not have the quote 100% correct, but that’s the gist of it.
The insinuation was (at least as I understood it when it was said) is that the small differences in image rendering between sensor generations, and even the much more subtle differences camera-to-camera within the same sensor generation, is intentional and even a feature. It’s kind of like when an emulsion is updated, it looks slightly different than it used to; one person might prefer the “old” version of the film, while another might prefer the updated iteration. For example, when Kodak went from the second to third generation of Kodachome in 1974, some photographers liked the change, and some (like William Eggleston) didn’t. If you preferred the old version of Kodachrome, you were soon out of luck once it sold out. Fujifilm cameras are a different story because you can still buy the old models on the second-hand market. You can find and use the one with the charm that you most prefer. Maybe that’s the X-Pro1. Perhaps it’s the X-T1. It could be the X100F. Possibly it’s the X-E4. Maybe it’s the X-T50. Or some other camera. It’s up to you to find the one that you especially love, and the intention is that you’ll continue making photographs with it for a long time, and not just for a couple of years until the next iteration is released.
The specific hardware and software in the camera plays a role in the image rendering. It would be extraordinarily difficult to 100% match the output of various sensors and processors. You can get very, very close, though; however, 100% exactly matching is not quite possible. That’s certainly a part of it. Maybe you don’t want to perfectly match the output anyway, if it would require ignoring a benefit of the updated technology. It could be that the new technology allows the programmers to better achieve the intended results, which were less possible with the older technology. Perhaps the vision of what those results should be has been tweaked a little over time. All of that is a factor. But that’s not the point that was made: each Fujifilm camera generation has its own unique quality, which was purposefully crafted, and you might especially like the particular charm of one more than the others. Since they’re not all perfectly identical, you get to decide which is your favorite.
My personal favorite is the fourth generation. I think the JPEG output of the X100V, X-T4, and X-E4 (I own those specific models) is special. The fifth generation, which has the advantage of Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace, is a very close second-favorite for me. There’s an obvious difference in output between those two generations, most notable (but not limited to) how deeply blue is rendered on some film simulations. Whether you prefer either of those two generations—or a different one entirely—is up to you; I really like the output from the Fujifilm X-Pro2, for example.
We’re all unique. Each of us have our own unique styles. We all have our own tastes. As the saying goes: Different strokes for different folks. The beauty of Fujifilm’s approach is that no X-series camera generation is objectively better than another. Each one might be considered subjectively better, just depending on who you ask, but they each have their own charm. You might even prefer certain aspects of one and certain aspects of another, and use both.
When it comes to other brands, for the most part you really don’t hear people talk about the picture charm of various models. People don’t discuss the image quality magic of (say) the Canon Rebel T7i or debate which Sony A6000 series model has the best picture profile rendering. This seems more exclusive to Fujifilm, and it’s because Fujifilm intended each iteration to have a unique allure, which sparks the discussions and debates, but more importantly it provides an avenue to connect with and really love the gear you use.
Below are the photographs that I captured on the Create With Us photowalk in Minneapolis with my Fujifilm X-E5.
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
In my estimation, the next generation of Fujifilm cameras is right around the corner, likely to be announced early next year. I’ll tell you why I think that, and I’ll take some guesses at what X-Trans VI could look like—what might be different on the next generation of X-series cameras.
Fujifilm’s generational lifespan for the X-series is about three years. Some are a little longer, some are a little shorter. X-Trans I had the shortest lifespan of only about one year, or maybe two years, depending on how you classify the X-M1, which had an X-Trans I sensor paired with X-Trans II processor. Otherwise, though, three or three-and-a-half years is the average. Even though the X-S20 and X-M5 (and likely the X-T30 III when it is announced soon) have an X-Trans IV sensor, I consider them fifth generation cameras because they have the X-Processor 5 and everything that goes with that—they have some notable similarities to the other fifth generation models (the X-M1, on the other hand, had notable dissimilarities with X-Trans II models). The X-H2/X-H2s kicked off X-Trans V a little over three years ago, so we’re due for the next generation.
Fujifilm has been using the X-E series as a marker for the end of an X-Trans generation—not as the last camera, but as the second-to-last. The X-E1 was the second-to-last X-Trans I camera, with the X-M1 as the last; the X-E2s was released simultaneously with the X70, the last two X-Trans II cameras; the X-E3 was the second-to-last X-Trans III model, with only the X-H1 following; the X-E4 was the second-to-last X-Trans IV release (not including the X-S20 and X-M5), with the X-T30 II as the last. The Fujifilm X-E5 will most likely continue this pattern, and be the second-to-last fifth-generation model, with only the upcoming X-T30 III following. I think it’s safe to say, based on past patterns, that 2025 will be the final year for the fifth-generation, and the sixth-generation will kick off in 2026.
Fujifilm often announces cameras in January/February, which are shipped in February/March. There’s a reasonable chance that will continue; however, not every year sees a camera released at the very beginning. A spring announcement with a late-spring, early-summer release is also common. My best guess is that the first sixth generation camera will be announced on or before the end of May, but probably sooner. Keep in mind this is merely a guess and nothing more.
Captured with a Fujifilm X-M1
What will X-Trans VI look like? I think it will be more about speed and efficiency than resolution. X-Trans takes a lot more computing power than Bayer, which not only puts a strain on the processor, but can also be more prone to heat dispersion issues. By emphasizing speed and efficiency improvements, Fujifilm can minimize some of the drawbacks to X-Trans. Besides, 40mp is already more than enough resolution for the format. I’m not sure if Fujifilm plans to continue using the same sensors and just upgrade the processor, or if we’ll see new sensors, too—or maybe a mix. Or it could be that we’ll see “new” sensors that have identical specs to the old ones, with small design improvements.
Sony makes Fujifilm’s camera sensors, as they do for many camera companies. If Fujifilm wants a partially-stacked 40mp APS-C sensor, Sony has to be willing to manufacture and sell it to Fujifilm. I think such a sensor would be well received in an X-H3 and X-T6, and would help to address speed and efficiency. Would Sony make that sensor, and how much more will it cost than the non-stacked version? That’s a good question. I think there is potential for some cameras to have a partially-stacked 40mp sensor (X-H3 and X-T6), and some to have a non-stacked 40mp sensor (for example, X-T60 and X-E6).
What about the X-H3s? Will it continue with the 26mp stacked sensor? If the X-H3 has a partially-stacked sensor, that might narrow the gap sufficiently for Fujifilm to discontinue the X-H2s line altogether. I think it’s possible that Fujifilm offers some small under-the-hood improvements along with the X-Processor 6, and simply call it the X-H2s II (basically, a very minor update). I also think it’s possible that Fujifilm replaces the X-H2s with an X-series version of the upcoming GFX Eterna cinema camera. I’m not sure how well the X-H2 and X-H2s have sold, and if Fujifilm feels that both models are justified in the new generation. If there’s one camera potentially on the chopping block, it’s likely either the X-H2 or the X-H2s; however, my guess is that they both continue, unless an “X Eterna” model is introduced as a sort-of replacement for the X-H2s.
I also wonder if Fujifilm will continue to use the X-Trans IV sensor into the sixth generation. As far as I know, Sony doesn’t offer any APS-C sensor in-between the 26mp that X-Trans IV is built on and the 40mp that X-Trans V is built on. Maybe Sony has been developing (say) a 32mp sensor behind the scenes; after all, Fujifilm was the first and (so far) only customer of the 40mp sensor, so it could happen with another one. If so, Fujifilm would move beyond the X-Trans IV sensor in its lower-resolution sixth generation cameras, like the X-S30, X-M6, and X-T30 IV (perhaps the X-T30 III and X-T50 “merge” into one line, called the X-T60, with a 32mp X-Trans VI sensor). If not, I suspect that the X-Trans IV sensor will live on for a few more years, or maybe they make a minor change to it and call it 26mp X-Trans VI. It might even make sense for Fujifilm to offer three different resolution options.
Captured with a Samsung NX210 in 2013
It’s possible, albeit highly unlikely, that Fujifilm will stop using Sony sensors. Samsung makes pretty good camera sensors, and Fujifilm even helps with some of their technology. They used to manufacture APS-C sensors for their long-defunct NX line, including a 28mp one that was pretty well regarded at the time. I could see Fujifilm using a new sensor maker for X-Trans VI, but I would be highly surprised if that actually happens. Sony is tried-and-true, reliable, and comfortable—if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
My guess is that the next X-Pro, which might be called X-Pro4, X-Pro5, or maybe even X-Pro6, will be announced early next year, and will be the first sixth generation camera. I have no idea what will be different about it. I really hope that it has the XPan aspect ratio—it would be an absolute shame if it doesn’t. The X-Pro1 kicked off X-Trans I, the X-Pro2 launched X-Trans III (there was a significant gap in-between the two), and the X-Pro3 was the first camera with Classic Negative (and some other JPEG goodies). It’s overdue, so it makes sense to me that it will be the first X-Trans VI model.
After that, the X-H3 and X-H3s (or X Eterna) seem like logical options, followed by the X-T6, which might come in late 2026 or early 2027. I could see the X-S30 announced in May of 2027, and with it the new 32mp sensor (if such a sensor happens). Of course, this is all highly speculative. I have no inside information, these are merely guesses that should be taken with a huge amount of salt.
I do think that X-Trans VI should introduce a new Film Simulation or two. While Fujifilm is the in-camera JPEG processing leader, other companies are trying to close the gap, so Fujifilm should not be complacent. Some ideas: PRO Neg. H, that resembles Fujicolor PRO 400H film, and turns pastel with overexposure; Velvia XPRO, which mimics Fujichrome Velvia 50 that has been cross-processed; Fortia, which is simply the Pop Color Advanced Filter graduated to Film Simulation, resembling Fujichrome Fortia film; Natura, a facsimile of Fujicolor Natura 1600; Neopan, a new B&W option similar to Acros but with more contrast. I have many other ideas, but those should get Fujifilm started if they’re not sure what to do.
It shouldn’t stop with Film Simulations. Some other JPEG ideas are: Highlight and Shadow Color Toning, allowing for a split tone aesthetic (available for both color and B&W photos; something like the Monochromatic Color option, but specifically for Highlight and/or Shadow); Faded Shadow Effect (Strong, Weak, Off); Vignetting (Strong, Weak, Off); Halation Effect (Strong, Weak, Off); Light Leak Effect (On, Random, Off); Mid Tone adjustment within the Tone Curve (-2 to +4); Medium Grain size and strength; Extra Strong and Extra Large Grain Effect. Additionally, I’d like to see the Retro and Expired Film Filters from the X half make their way into Advanced Filters, and also the ability to set Grain and perhaps some other customizations within Advanced Filters. Last but certainly not least, all of the 40mp cameras should have the XPan aspect ratio. If Fujifilm introduced just half of those ideas, it would be highly celebrated.
I’d also like to see Fujifilm address the IQ options—the Recipe parameters—linked to other settings, such as AF, sound, etc., within C1-C7. I explained this problem last year, and provided Fujifilm with a potential solution that came from Fred Miranda—if you’re from Fujifilm, you may want to read that article. Also, John Peltier covered this topic in his Fujifilm X-E5 video. There’s more than one way that this could be addressed, and the X-E5 does sort-of somewhat fix it, but I think it’s important to find a solution sooner than later.
We’re nearing the end of the fifth generation of the X-series. In all likelihood, the sixth generation will come in 2026, which is right around the corner. I have no idea what changes that will bring, but it will certainly bring some. While I’m excited for the new cameras, I also want to express my opinion that camera successors come too quickly. If parts can be secured, camera makers should keep manufacturing models for many years. The refresh rate should be five-to-seven years; three years should be an exception and not a rule. Regular firmware updates can keep “old” products fresh. This also means you have to keep building the current models, and situations where a certain one is discontinued and the successor doesn’t come for a couple of years should be avoided. Discontinue the old model when the new one is six months out, and when the new one is released, it should be a substantial update, and not a minor refresh. This seems like a more realistic approach, and is more similar to how the camera industry worked for many, many decades—I hope we can get back to that. In the meantime, I’ll continue to enjoy the cameras I have, which are quite excellent photo-making machines. It’s fun to consider what the future might be, but it’s important to not lose sight of here and now, which is what actually matters.
A common question I get is, “Which Fujifilm X-series camera should I buy?” With so many options, it can be difficult to figure out which one is right for you. Some models are quite alike, with overlapping features and similar price points, which can be confusing—especially if you’re new to the system. Each camera in Fujifilm’s lineup has its own role to play, and understanding that role makes it much easier to choose the right one for you. To help you out, I’ll break down each X-series camera below and explain its purpose in the lineup—what it’s best at, who it’s for, and why Fujifilm made it. With that foundation, you’ll be better equipped to make your decision.
Fujifilm X-H2s
The Fujifilm X-H2s is Fujifilm’s most premium X-series camera—the flagship model. It’s designed for speed, which makes it the most ideal option for videography, as well as sports and wildlife photography. It’s the only X-series camera—and only APS-C camera—with a stacked sensor, which allows it to be faster than other models. Interestingly, a large majority of the official Fujifilm videos (found on their various YouTube channels) are filmed on this camera—if you want to know what you can do with it cinematically, there are tons and tons of excellent examples online. Because the X-H2s is the top-of-the-line option, it is also the most expensive at $2,799 (after the recent price increase across the Fujifilm lineup).
A couple of possible downsides to the X-H2s are that it’s the largest (along with the X-H2, which shares the same body), which might make it less ideal for travel or walk-around photography, and it doesn’t have the traditional tactile exposure controls that Fujifilm is known for. This is a PASM model that’s specifically intended to be appealing to those coming from Canikony brand cameras, who might not appreciate Fujifilm’s retro-styled bodies. It’s weather sealed and has two card slots (one for CFexpress Type B). The rear LCD screen is vari-angle, and can twist many directions. I find it fascinating that camera reviewers often compare the X-H2s to full-frame models; those are somewhat unfair apples-to-oranges comparisons, but you see it often, which just goes to show that this camera punches above its weight class.
If you really need speed, the Fujifilm X-H2s is your best bet. It’s the top X-series option for video, sports, and wildlife. This is the most “pro” camera in the lineup, if that’s important to you. I have never used this camera personally.
Fujifilm X-H2
The Fujifilm X-H2 is nearly identical to the X-H2s. The main difference is that, instead of a 26mp stacked X-Trans V sensor intended for speed, it has a 40mp non-stacked X-Trans V sensor intended for resolution. It’s not quite as quick as the “s” version, so it’s not as ideal for video, sports and wildlife; however, it’s still snappy, and still excellent for those situations—it’s a great hybrid camera. You simply trade a little speed for megapixels, while saving $600. You get basically the same camera for significantly less money. If you need the fastest X-series model, the “s” version is the one to get; if not, the X-H2 is quite compelling, especially if you are moving over from one of the “big three” brands. I have not used the X-H2 personally.
Fujifilm X-Pro5
There is not currently an X-Pro5. The last camera in this series was the X-Pro3, released in 2019 and discontinued in 2022. A successor is overdue, and likely to come next year (my prediction is in the spring, but that’s merely a guess). Nothing is known about the camera (not even the name… “X-Pro5” is speculation); however, it probably won’t be too dissimilar from other X-Pro models. The X-Pro series offers classic rangefinder styling, a hybrid EVF/OVF, and durability (other than the rear LCD cable on the X-Pro3… that’s another story, and probably why that camera was discontinued). X-Pro is top-of-the-line out of all the retro-styled X-series models. These cameras are beloved, they’re classics—the Leica of Fujifilm, so to speak. There’s not much to say about it at this time other than it’s coming someday, and it will likely be over $2,000 (maybe well over) when it does come. I wouldn’t be surprised if Fujifilm kicked off the sixth generation with this camera. Whenever it is released, you’ll know, because it will definitely make headlines. The picture above is of an X-Pro1.
Fujifilm X100VI
The X100 series is legendary. It’s probably the most iconic Fujifilm line, with a beautiful retro rangefinder design, including a hybrid OVF/EVF. Pairing the 40MP X-Trans V sensor with a fixed 23mm (35mm full-frame equivalent) f/2 lens, the X100VI is perfect for street, travel, and documentary photography. This iteration is the first in the series to have IBIS. The leaf shutter, built-in flash, and built-in ND filter are three especially great but often overlooked features. The X100VI is compact and discreet, yet eye catching—no wonder it is the most viral camera of all time!
Because you cannot change the lens, this camera is not for everyone; however, it can inspire you to see differently because you’re limited to one focal length, which can force you to think more creatively. The Fujifilm X100VI is my “desert island” camera—if I could only have one model for the rest of my life, it would be this one. With that said, I find that the X100-series tends to pair really well with an interchangeable-lens model, for when the 35mm-equivalent focal length just isn’t the right choice. The X100VI isn’t a point-and-shoot; it’s a premium compact, which is reflected by the $1,799 MSRP (after the recent price increase).
Fujifilm X-T5
If there’s one quintessential interchangeable-lens Fujifilm camera, it’s probably the X-T5. It closely embodies Fujifilm’s retro styling and tactile controls, while packing in their latest 40mp X-Trans V sensor and processor. You get IBIS, a three-way tilting LCD, dual card slots, and weather sealing—all in a body that still feels compact. It’s basically an X-H2, but smaller, lighter, better-looking, and cheaper. This is a premium stills-centric model, yet it’s no slouch when it comes to video capabilities. A lot of comparisons have been made to the Nikon Zf, which is a full-frame camera (not necessarily a fair equivalence), yet the X-T5 holds its own pretty well, (again) punching above its weight class.
The X-T5 is a workhorse that can do a bit of everything. It seems well suited for landscapes, portraits, travel, etc., etc.. I used this camera extensively for about a year-and-a-half, then my wife, Amanda, used it for a year (mostly portraits, theater, and video), and now I have it back, and am enjoying photographing with it again. As a stills-centric yet good-for-everything camera, it’s easy to recommend. With an MSRP of $1,899, it’s under 2K but definitely not cheap.
Fujifilm X-T50
The Fujifilm X-T50 is the little brother of the X-T5. It has the same sensor, processor, and IBIS—it’s basically the same internally as the X-T5 and even the X-H2—but lacks weather sealing and dual card slots. It’s smaller and lighter, with a little more plastic. This was the first camera with a Film Dial, which adds a bit of aesthetic versatility, and is great for exploring which Film Simulations you might like best. This is Fujifilm’s mid-range retro SLR-styled camera, but is just as capable as the higher-end X-T5.
Because this camera is smaller and lighter, it’s a little better for travel or walk-around photography. The X-T50 is a bit more beginner or enthusiast orientated than the X-T5, but you can grow with it, since it’s just as capable as the higher end model. At $1,699, it’s only a little cheaper than the X-T5. If size and weight are a priority, that might be a reason to choose this camera, or if you want a slightly less complicated camera; otherwise, the X-T5 is the better option. I really like the X-T50 personally, particularly because of the Film Dial.
Fujifilm X-E5
The Fujifilm X-E5 is the newest X-series camera. It’s basically an X-T50, but in an X100VI-like body. It’s as close as you’re going to get to an interchangeable-lens X100VI, especially when paired with pancake lenses. It’s Fujifilm’s smallest camera with an EVF, which makes it especially great for travel photography, or just everyday carry. It’s also the only model where you can program up to 11 Recipes into it. The X-E5 is the most premium camera in the X-E series, and is solidly mid-tier, with improved build quality over its predecessor. I have no doubt that this will be a big hit, even with the $1,699 price tag. If you like retro rangefinder styling, this is the interchangeable-lens camera to buy.
Fujifilm X-S20
The Fujifilm X-S20 is the little brother of the X-H2s. It’s a hybrid model that’s especially good for video, but is no slouch for stills. It uses the “old” 26mp X-Trans IV sensor paired with the new X Processor 5. It is not weather sealed and has only one card slot. It’s not necessarily retro styled, and lacks the traditional tactile dials found on most Fujifilm models; instead, it has PASM controls similar to the X-H2s and X-H2, and it has an articulating rear LCD screen. It’s intended to be appealing to those coming from Canikony brand cameras. It only has C1-C4 and not C1-C7 like many other Fujifilm cameras, for those who use Film Simulation Recipes. There are two X-S20’s in my house: one belongs to my wife, Amanda, and the other belongs to my son, Jonathan. They both really love it—in fact, my wife chose the X-S20 over the X-T5. At $1,599, this is a mid-tier camera, but it is slightly more affordable than the X-T50 and X-E5.
Fujifilm X-T30 II / X-T30 III
The current entry-level X-series camera with an EVF and retro tactile controls is the Fujifilm X-T30 II. It has the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor and X Processor 4; however, it was the very last fourth-generation model, so it does have some options that the earlier 4th-gen cameras lack, making it seem a bit less dated. At $999, it is definitely more affordable than the options above, making it a compelling choice, and probably the best overall value right now—a great beginners camera. It doesn’t have IBIS, and may not be the best option for video—although, with a gimbal or tripod, it’s certainly capable of recording quality clips.
The X-T50 was not this camera’s successor, but a whole new highly similar line that is a bit more premium. Fujifilm is about to replace the X-T30 II with (what will likely be called) the X-T30 III. Because of this, the X-T30 II can be a bit tough to find in-stock, as I believe Fujifilm has stopped production of it. If you want the best affordable Fujifilm camera, be sure to buy an X-T30 II—that is, if you can find one. Fujifilm is expected to announce the X-T30 III later this year, likely in the fall. I anticipate it being nearly identical to the X-T30 II, just with the new X Processor 5, possibly with a Film Dial like the X-T50, and perhaps a couple hundred dollars more expensive. In all likelihood, the X-T30 III will be the last fifth-generation X-series camera.
Fujifilm X-M5
The Fujifilm X-M5 is the bargain basement entry-level X-series camera, with an MSRP of $899. It has a striking rangefinder-like retro design, but lacks traditional tactile controls (it has PASM instead) and lacks an EVF. It’s the smallest and lightest interchangeable-lens model in the lineup. Like the X-S20, it pairs the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor with the X Processor 5. It’s touted as a hybrid camera that’s excellent for video, but it lacks IBIS. In a sense, X-M5 is the little brother of the X-S20, and in a sense it’s the X-E5’s smaller sibling. If you have a tight budget or if you prioritize size and weight, this camera might be for you. Between this and the X-T30 II, if you are primarily a videographer, the X-M5 is your best bet, but if you are primarily a stills photographer, I recommend the X-T30 II. It seems like a good option as your very first camera, or else as a second camera for when your larger model isn’t ideal. I’ve never used the X-M5 personally.
Fujifilm X half
Last and maybe least is the Fujifilm X half. This is technically an X-series camera, but it’s not X-Trans, and isn’t APS-C, either. It has a 1″ Bayer sensor orientated vertically, with a fixed 32mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens. It’s essentially a digital version of half-frame cameras, like the Fujica Half, Olympus Pen, Kodak H35N, and Pentax 17. The X half has as much in common with the Instax Evo line as it does the X-series, and bridges a gap between the two systems, with a foot in both camps. It’s a heck-of-a-lot of fun, but definitely less serious than all of the options above. This could be a toy for the photographer who has everything, or a casual camera for events and vacations, or a first camera for your child that shows an interest in photography. You’re unlikely to capture portfolio-worthy pictures with the X half, but for social media or scrapbooks, this camera is quite excellent. Both my wife and I enjoy using it (and have fought over it), but neither of us would chose it as our primary model. At $850, it’s a bit expensive for what it is.
Conclusion
If you’re still unsure which Fujifilm cameras are right for you, let me break it down even more simply. If you are coming from one of the big three camera companies and want the easiest transition, you’re going to look at the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-S20. If you are primarily a videographer, you’ll want to consider those same three cameras, and I’ll throw in the X-M5 if you are on a tight budget. If you simply want the best-of-the-best, the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-T5 are your top options (and the next X-Pro, whenever that comes out). If you are primarily a stills photographer, the X-T5 is top-of-the-line (the next X-Pro will be, as well), the X-T50 and X-E5 are nearly as good (and smaller), and the X-T30 II is the best bargain. The best looking cameras are the next X-Pro (assuming that Fujifilm doesn’t change much), X100VI, and X-E5. If you don’t want to invest in a whole system, and just want to dip your toes into the Fujifilm world, the X100VI is what you should buy. If you don’t have a lot of money to spend, the X-T30 II and X-M5 are the two cameras you need to consider. If you have large hands and/or plan to use long lenses, the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-S20 have the best ergonomics, and I’ll throw in the X-T5 as a bonus. If you want small and lightweight, look at the X-M5, X-E5, X100VI, and (of course) the X half. If you want the most enjoyable, the X half, X100VI, X-E5, and the next X-Pro are the ones to consider. I’m sure I’m missing some situations, but I hope this provides clarity for some of you who are trying to decide which camera to purchase, and are just unsure.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Fujifilm recently loaned me an X-E5 to try out for a week or so. I also got to play with one at the B&H BILD Expo last month, so I was already a bit familiar with the camera before it arrived in the mail. Included with the X-E5 was the brand-new Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 pancake lens, so I’ll also be discussing that in this review, too. Let’s dive right in!
The Fujifilm X-E5 is actually the sixth X-E camera. The X-E1, released in 2012, was the very first, and the third X-series model overall, with only the X100 and X-Pro1 predating it. The X-E2 came out only one year later, followed by the nearly identical X-E2s in 2016. A year after that, Fujifilm released the X-E3, which saw the first significant design change (although it was still pretty similar). The X-E4 came out in 2021, which was the most different, with an emphasis on minimalism, compactness, and affordability; however, it was still similar overall. We have another significant design change with the X-E5, yet it still retains the distinctive look of an X-E series model.
With the X-E5, Fujifilm quite noticeably improved the construction quality—for example, the top plate is a single piece of machined aluminum, and the camera seems less plasticky overall. It just feels more sturdy, more premium, more refined than the X-E4. With a pancake lens attached—like the new 23mm f/2.8—the camera closely resembles an X100VI, which was clearly intentional. The X-E5 is essentially an interchangeable-lens X100VI; for those who have asked for such a camera: here it is! The two models aren’t exactly the same, and they each have their advantages and disadvantages, but they’re certainly similar enough to justify the comparison.
I don’t want to dive too deeply into the specs, but some important notes are that the X-E5 has the same 40-megapixel X-Trans V sensor and processor as the X100VI, X-T50, and X-T5. Like those models, the X-E5 also has IBIS. This is a camera capable of capturing high quality photos and videos. Not surprising, the X-E5 is also much more expensive—plus a tad larger and heavier—than its predecessor.
Like the X-T50 and X-M5, the X-E5 has a Film Dial, although it’s implemented a bit differently. Instead of a knob, it’s a wheel on the back, with a little window on the top plate. This is a really cool design; however, there is a downside: it has fewer Film Simulations. The X-T50 and X-M5 have only eight of the 20 Film Sims on the knob, with three customizable slots for your favorites that were left out; the X-E5 has only six Film Simulations, with three customizable slots. The six Film Sims on the dial are Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, and Acros. Somehow—shockingly and inexplicably—Classic Negative was left out, as was Nostalgic Negative. I know that not all of them could make the cut, but I definitely question why Classic Negative was not included—seems like a sin.
The three customizable slots—called FS1, FS2, and FS3—can be set to any Film Simulation. In addition to that, they can also be customized into Film Simulation Recipes (functionality that should be—and hopefully will be—brought to the X-T50 and X-M5 via a firmware update). This is the very first time that Fujifilm has used the term “Recipe” in a camera—amazing! You can have 11 different Recipes programmed into the X-E5: seven within the C1-C7 Custom Settings presets, one in the IQ Menu set, and three on the Film Dial. The Film Dial also works well with my Universal Negative and Film Dial Recipes, providing extra aesthetic versatility. Only the C1-C7 Recipes can be custom named, so you have to remember what the other four are.
While this is certainly a welcome evolution of this feature, it could be made even better. For example, all of the Film Simulations should have the option for Recipes, and not just FS1/FS2/FS3. One issue with this UI, though, is that Recipes are scattered: some in Custom Settings presets, some on the Film Dial, and one in the IQ Menu. I think, more ideally, you’d find them all in one place. A lot of Fujifilm users would appreciate a Custom Settings Dial instead of a Film Dial, with maybe C1-C9 or C1-C12 (more is better). There are a lot of different ways that this could be addressed, and it’s something that should be addressed for future models. Still, the opportunity to have three extra Recipes programmed into the camera at any one time is quite nice, and I’m thankful for it. This is the main reason why I preordered this camera, even though I own an X-E4 that I really like.
Included with the X-E5 was the new Fujinon XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR pancake. This lens is very similar to the Fujinon 27mm f/2.8 R WR, which happens to be one of my absolute favorite lenses. I’ve been saying for years that Fujifilm should have more pancake lenses in their lineup, since a major selling point of Fujifilm cameras are their compact size and minimal weight. A camera like the X-E5 paired with a handful of tiny pancakes is ideal for traveling. This particular camera and lens combo is especially great for everyday walk-around photography.
The lens is sharp with minimal flaws. It has great close-focus capabilities; it’s not a macro-lens by any means, but with 40mp to crop from, it’s possible to use it for near-macro photography. From a technical point-of-view (and mind you, I didn’t do any serious testing), it’s pretty darn good for what it is, a marvel of engineering; from an artistic point-of-view, it seems to lack a little of the magic (a.k.a. character) that the 27mm f/2.8 and 23mm f/2 lenses are known for. Like the 27mm, it isn’t the quietest Fujinon lens. If you are trying to decide between the 23mm f/2.8 and the 27mm f/2.8, that’s going to be a tough call—personally, I like the 27mm just a bit more; however, the close-focus capabilities of the 23mm is certainly a significant plus. If you are trying to decide between the 23mm f/2.8 and 23mm f/2, that’s also going to be difficult, and your decision might come down to just how small is small enough for you. If you are buying the Fujifilm X-E5, it seems like an easy choice to get it bundled with the 23mm f/2.8, since it’s only $200 more when the lens itself is $500—if you have no intentions of keeping it, just turn around and sell it for $450, which makes the camera more affordable.
Ants & Funyun – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Kodachrome 64
Getting back to the X-E5, the camera has a couple of really cool features, but you can only use one of them, and not both. The first, which is borrowed from the GFX100RF, is called Surround View Mode. It allows you to see outside of the frame when using an aspect ratio other than 3:2, giving a faux optical viewfinder experience (sort of). This is particularly nice when using the 1:1 aspect ratio. The XPan ratio would have been a great addition, but (sadly) it’s still missing on X-series models. The second feature is called Classic Display Mode, which turns the EVF into a really cool retro 1980’s-inspired display. I like both, but I couldn’t figure out how to activate the Classic Display Mode for some time—eventually I asked a Fujifilm tech rep for help. As it turns out, if Surround View Mode is activated, even when using the 3:2 aspect ratio, Classic Display Mode is disabled (and vice versa). Fujifilm: I suggest that Surround View Mode be automatically disabled when in the 3:2 aspect ratio, so that Classic Display Mode can be used; when changing aspect ratios to anything other than 3:2, if Surround View is activated, it would automatically disable Classic Display. This way, you don’t have to jump through hoops to use both of these cool new features.
While the X-E4 saw a lot of buttons removed in the name of minimalism, Fujifilm gave them to the X-E5 in spades. Just the new front control lever alone allows for five customizable functions. The inclusion of the rear command wheel and M/C/S switch means that you shouldn’t be short of camera controls, no matter how many functions you need quick access to. Those who disliked the direction of the X-E4 should especially appreciate its successor.
What else can I tell you about the Fujifilm X-E5? It isn’t weather-sealed (although it seems to have some level of weather resistance—I wouldn’t put it under a faucet, though). It uses the “old” NP-W126S battery. I expected that, as those things would have increased the size, weight, and cost even more. The X-E5 is definitely more premium than previous X-E cameras. I had suggested that Fujifilm prioritize size, weight, and cost by keeping it nearly the same as the X-E4; however, my opinion was clearly in the minority. Most people asked for an interchangeable-lens X100VI, and the X-E5 is as close to that as you’re likely ever going to get. It’s a very nice camera.
It comes with a “nice” price tag, too. In America, it’s $1,700 for the body-only, and $1,900 when bundled with the new 23mm pancake lens. That’s pretty shocking, especially when it’s double the price of the X-E4; however, keep in mind that inflation and tariffs have impacted the price in addition to the more expensive components that Fujifilm used in the camera. Interestingly enough, the X-E1 was $999 in 2012, which is about $1,400 in today’s dollars; add to that tariffs, and you’ve pretty much got the X-E5 price tag, never mind the 40mp sensor, IBIS, and better build quality. While it seems expensive, it is not an entry-level model. And with Fujifilm raising the price (in America) of the X100VI to $1,800, the X-T50 to $1,600, the X-T5 to $1,900, the MSRP of the X-E5 makes a little more sense. I do think it’s worthwhile to buy at $1,700, which is why I have it preordered bundled with the 23mm f/2.8 lens.
Mission San Xavier del Bac – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Kodak Vericolor VPS
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
According to Fujirumors, Fujifilm is likely to raise the price by about 10% on most of their cameras and lenses beginning August 1st, which is Friday. It’s unclear if this is worldwide or just in America, but my suspicion is that it will just be in America, and is related to the tariffs. I also highly doubt that the X half and X-E5 will be affected, because the increase was already built into their MSRP.
Every major camera maker has either already increased their prices, or has announced that they will be soon—or both (already raised prices, but further price increases are forthcoming). While the X half and X-E5 were on the leading edge of the increase (and both were criticized for it), Fujifilm has largely delayed price increases on everything else. My guess is, with the Japan trade deal finalized, Fujifilm has something stable to determine what the increase should be, so that’s why it’s been delayed until now. I also suspect that Fujifilm will try to manufacture more of their U.S.-bound units in Japan instead of China, something they’ve already begun doing.
It’s also possible that this will be the first in a series of price increases. If Fujifilm were to raise the cost by (say) 20% all at once, that could scare off potential customers; however, by increasing it by “only” 10% now and another 10% later (perhaps on January 1st), it allows customers to acclimate more gradually to the higher prices. It’s like the frog in boiling water thing. Hopefully, though, this will be the one-and-only increase; if it is worldwide and not limited to America, I think that could possibly be an indication of it being only a one-time thing. It’s all just speculation at this point, and time will eventually tell—until then, take it all with a very large grain of salt.
Of course some will say that this is just Fujifilm being greedy or that Fujifilm has lost the plot and is out-of-touch with their customers. That’s all nonsense, spoken largely by trolls and click-bait content creators. Every camera maker is dealing with this same issue right now, and they are all raising their prices (RED is the only camera made in America as far as I’m aware, but I’m not sure how long that will last since they’ve been purchased by Nikon). I said back when the X half was announced that it was a foreshadowing of future price increases. When everyone complained about the cost, I said in time it would seem pretty normal, once the MSRP of everything else goes up. Now they’re going up. My suspicion is that we’re still five or six months out from all the dust settling, and it’s even possible that the X half and X-E5 could see a small price reduction at some point (since they were announced when there was a lot more uncertainty), who knows?
All of that is to say, if you’ve been eyeing a certain camera or lens, you might want to get your order in now and not wait until the price goes up later this week. If you delay, you may have to pay about 10% more. This is probably just for those in America, although I’m not 100% sure, and worldwide price increases are certainly a possibility, albeit a fairly slim possibility in my estimation.
Fujifilm has already produced and delivered more copies of the X100VI than any other previous X100-series model. There are more X100VI’s in the hands of photographers right now than X100V, or X100F, or X100T, etc.. That’s truly amazing, since the X100VI was released only about a year-and-a-half ago, while the other models had production runs closer to four years.
The reason why Fujifilm has made so many copies of this camera is because of the unprecedented historic demand for it. By far, there were more preorders for the X100VI than any other camera by any manufacturer ever. No camera in the history of cameras has had so much interest at announcement. And, if the demand doesn’t relent anytime soon, it could possibly lead to the X100VI becoming the most-sold camera of all time (not including cellphones), which would be a highly improbable achievement. I don’t think that will happen—not even close—because surely the demand isn’t that strong. At some point, it will certainly back off to a more “normal” level, right?
There are still people lamenting that they can’t get their hands on a Fujifilm X100VI. They’d like to buy one, but can’t find it in stock anywhere. As soon as a camera store lists it in-stock, which doesn’t happen often, within hours or even minutes, they’re sold out again. So it might be easy to believe that the demand hasn’t relented. But that’s mostly just in America, and it seems to be partially related to the tariffs. Worldwide, the X100VI has been becoming easier and easier to find. It’s still out of stock at a lot of places, but overall, it’s not terribly hard to get one if you want one. People are reporting walking into their local camera store and finding a few copies on the shelf. So internationally—and depending on where exactly—the situation is a bit better than here at home.
What makes me think that supply and demand are equalizing is that there are used copies available for a reasonable price, like at B&H. Scalping continues on sites like eBay, but it’s not nearly as bad as it was last year. Things are slowly returning to normal. And this is where Fujifilm needs to be very, very careful, a situation that I’ve been predicting for more than a year.
With the X100VI, Fujifilm doubled the production numbers of the X100V from the get-go, from 7,500 units per month to 15,000. At one point last year they said that they wanted to double production again, making it four times that of the X100V, but later stated that that simply wasn’t possible. My best guess is that it is somewhere around three times more than the X100V right now, which would put it at about 22,000 copies per month, or about 265,000 units per year (these numbers are just guesses). The historically “normal” demand for an X100-series camera is 90,000 per year.
At some point, demand for the X100VI will drop. Once the majority of those who want one get one, Fujifilm will sell a lot fewer of them. If the market gets oversaturated, the value will decrease, and Fujifilm will be forced to reduce the price. Those selling them used will have to drop their price, too. This is a situation that Fujifilm really wants to avoid, as it would reduce brand strength. It would be a Lean Production failure if Fujifilm produced more X100VI’s than there are customers wanting to buy them. Fujifilm must proceed with caution.
The mistake of overproduction would be very easy. Since it takes many months from securing parts and scheduling manufacturing to delivering an assembled camera to a store, the demand must be forecasted in advance, probably at least six months. If Fujifilm is making 22,000 units per month, and the total international demand right now is 130,000, in six months Fujifilm would have overproduced 2,000 copies. That’s probably not a big deal, as they’ll surely sell those cameras; however, if they’ve still got 132,000 cameras in the process somewhere, to be manufactured over the following six months, that’s a massive and possibly devastating problem. That’s something that could sink the whole camera division.
I’m just little ol’ me sitting in my office trying to stay cool from the brutal Arizona sun, but even I can see early signs that supply and demand are equalling out. That should be a huge caution flag for Fujifilm. They should strongly consider scaling back production. Perhaps drop it back to 15,000 units monthly ASAP, and work towards “only” 7,500 units monthly by 12 months from now. Obviously Fujifilm wants to capitalize on this lightning-in-a-jar situation as much as possible, and they’d love to sell a quarter-million-plus copies per year without hardly any promotion—what a dream circumstance! But they should also listen to that nagging feeling that this won’t last forever, because it won’t.
I wouldn’t doubt if the X100VI sold twice as many units as the X100V or any other prior X100-series camera by the time its production run has ended. It might even sell four times as many. At some point, though, all the people who want one will have one. Aside from that, trends change quickly. All it takes is some shift in market dynamics or some other camera to catch the attention of social media influencers for the X100VI to be yesterday’s news. Overproduction is a real problem that Fujifilm is well acquainted with and desperately wants to avoid, and no other X-series camera has had a higher risk of overproduction than the X100VI. Fujifilm should ask themselves if now is the time to scale back, because it would be very easy to overshoot this, something that they’d certainly regret doing.
Fujirumors posted an article today entitled BREAKING: This Totally Unexpected Fujifilm Camera is Coming in 2025 – And I Know You Won’t Believe Me. I believe it and even expected it, because I’ve been saying it for over a year. If you regularly read Fuji X Weekly, you probably believe it, too, and might even have expected it yourself. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve predicted it over the last 14 months—probably a good handful. For some (including myself), this is not a surprise in the least.
In the third paragraph of my Fujifilm X-T50 review (published on May 16, 2024), I stated, “The X-T50 is not the successor to the X-T30 II, but a whole new (yet highly similar) line. Fujifilm plans to sell the X-T30 II alongside the X-T50, similarly to what they did with the X-T3 and X-T4 a few years back. This also means that there is a potential future successor to the X-T30 II, perhaps called the X-T30 III or X-T40; I don’t know that for sure, but I think it is a fair assumption. The main thing for you to know is that the X-T50 is not a replacement for any previous model, but a whole new camera.”
Just two months ago, in my article entitled My Hopes for the Fujifilm X-E5 (published on May 21st), I concluded with this: “My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall….” It looks like that guess was pretty much correct.
For those still scratching their heads, Fujirumors just leaked that the X-T30 II’s successor (which isn’t the X-T50) is coming sometime in 2025. And this is taking the Fujifilm community by surprise. Many people apparently assumed that the X-T50 was the X-T30 II’s successor, even though Fujifilm said from the get-go that it wasn’t. Fuji X Weekly might have been the only website that predicted the X-T30 III (or maybe they’ll call it X-T40, but I doubt it). I don’t have any inside information, I only took Fujifilm at their word, and followed the sequence of past releases to predict this outcome. It just made sense to me.
So what will the Fujifilm X-T30 III look like? I think it will be exactly the same as the X-T30 and X-T30 II (which was mostly just a firmware update to the X-T30), except with the X-Processor 5. In other words, it will have Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace, but otherwise will be pretty much identical to the X-T30 II. Some are predicting an X-T50 but with the 26mp sensor instead of 40mp, but I don’t think so, personally. There will be a price increase, because of inflation (and, in America, the tariffs). The X-T30 II was $900 in 2021, which is $1,070 today, so don’t be surprised if the X-T30 III is about $1,050-$1,100 USD for the body-only outside of America, and $1,300-$1,400 in the US due to tariffs. That’s just the new normal, I think.
The question that some will certainly ask is why does this camera need to exist. The X-M5 is the new entry-level model. The X-S20 is the hybrid PASM model underneath the X-H2/X-H2s. The X-E5 has been upgraded to a mid-tier camera. The X-T50 is also a mid-tier model. Where does the X-T30 III fit into that? I believe that it will be the lowest-tier non-PASM camera, underneath the X-T50 and X-T5. This line has been historically successful for Fujifilm. It offers a more affordable option for those who want an EVF. But… I think it will also be an indication of what’s to come very soon with the other models (aside from the X-E5 and X half): price increases (at least in America, maybe not worldwide). Other brands have already announced higher prices, and Fujifilm will be doing so soon, too, in my opinion.
Of course, I’ve been wrong about plenty of things before. For every one thing that I’ve predicted correct, I’ve predicted two or three completely incorrect. That’s the trouble with guessing the future (ask Robert Zemeckis). I cannot say with any level of certainty what the X-T30 II’s successor will be like, so my predictions should be taken with a large grain of salt. But the fact is that the X-T30 II’s successor is coming soon, and I’m not surprised by it.
I got a surprise package in the mail from Fujifilm: the brand-new X half! I will write a review of the camera in a few weeks probably—I haven’t had it nearly long enough to provide any proper insights. It’s a fun little camera, with some positive and negative aspects. We’ll talk about all of that at some point in the future. Today I want to write about how Fujifilm could implement some features of this camera into future X-series models.
Specifically, I want to discuss a few of the new Filters. Filters are not Film Simulations (although some of them are based on Provia); on all other X-series models, these are known as Advanced Filters. The X half has the usual array: Toy Camera, Miniature Effect, Pop Color, High-Key, Low-Key, Dynamic Tone, Soft Focus, and Partial Color. There are also some new ones, that apparently are borrowed from the Instax Evo line: Canvas, Retro, Vignette, Blur, Fisheye, Color Shift, Mirror, Double Exposure, Light Leak, Halation, and Expired Film. Some of these are uninteresting, and probably should have been left off the camera so that one could navigate the menu faster. But some of these are great, and should be included in future X-series models—just maybe not in the same way.
My favorite is Light Leak. With this filter, the camera puts a random faux light leak on your images. You don’t know what you’re going to get, and that serendipity can be thrilling, especially when it just really works with the image. I would love Light Leak to become a JPEG option (like Color Chrome Effect and Grain) on all X-series cameras moving forward. You should have three choices: All (where every picture gets a light leak), Random (where some pictures get it, but most don’t), or Off (for those who don’t want it at all). This would be such a fun thing for Fujifilm to add, and it seems like it wouldn’t be very difficult to do.
Film Leak Filter — Fujifilm X half
Next up is Expired Film, which has three options: Green, Red, and Neutral. This should be a new Advanced Filter on future X-series cameras. On the X half, your Grain settings get applied to the Filters (at least some of them; I haven’t tested them all yet), and not just the Film Simulations; however, on the X-series, you can’t apply Grain to the Advanced Filters. So this is actually two suggestions for Fujifilm: add Expired Film to Advanced Filters, and allow Grain to be selected for Advanced Filters.
Expired Film (Green) Filter — Fujifilm X half diptych
Third is Halation, which puts a red glow around bright highlights. This Filter should be a JPEG option that can be applied to any Film Simulation. I suggest three choices: Off, Weak, Strong. I would love to pair this effect with my CineStill 800T Recipe to more accurately mimic the film. The X half is not necessarily a great option for nighttime photography, so it’s almost a waste on this camera, but I definitely see potential for this effect on other X-series models.
Halation Filter — Fujifilm X half
I haven’t used Retro yet, but I’m sure it would be fine to join the Advanced Filter club. Vignette should probably be added as a JPEG option (like Color Chrome Effect and Grain). In my opinion, Fujifilm should graduate Pop Color to Film Simulation, and call it Fortia. In-camera diptychs are just a ton of fun, but I don’t see that coming to other cameras. The Film Camera Mode is pretty cool, and I’d like to see something similar be included in the next X-Pro or X100-series model (although maybe implemented slightly differently). The X half has plenty of unique features and functions, which is what makes it an interesting camera. In my opinion, some of these need to find their way into other models, and not remain solely on the X half.
In 1978, Pentax surprised the photographic world with the Auto 110, a tiny interchangeable-lens SLR that used 110 film cartridges. It was the smallest ILC ever made. For only $249, you got the body, a 24mm f/2.8 lens, a case, and a strap. Pentax discontinued the Auto 110 in 1986.
The concept of this camera was portability and simplicity. It was the smallest and lightest SLR ever made—probably the only one that’s pocketable. It was one of the most simple SLRs to operate. In order to accomplish these goals, Pentax built it around the 110 film format, which was considered subpar and only for amateurs. And that was the paradox: interchangeable-lens SLRs were for enthusiasts and pros, while 110 film was not.
Serious photographers would never, ever use 110 film. The camera was fully auto except for focus; at the time, anything auto was largely considered for novices, as “real photographers” used full manual. Interchangeable-lens SLR cameras were the standard for hobbyists and professionals. The Pentax Auto 110 occupied a weird space of being too robust and expensive for the uninitiated, yet too lackluster for anyone remotely serious. Who would buy it? While plenty of photographers scoffed at the Pentax Auto 110, it sold fairly well, and Pentax continued to make it for eight years—a pretty long run. So how did Pentax pull it off? Why was the camera not a flop?
There is a market for compact, unique, fun, less-serious cameras. The Pentax Auto 110 was able to get the most out of the small film format, delivering image quality that was plenty good enough for everyday moments. No, the pictures weren’t going to grace the cover of magazines or hang on museum walls, but they could be placed into photo albums, or in an 8″x10″ frame and hung in the hallway. It was so small and lightweight that the camera didn’t get in the way, and could be easily carried everywhere. It was simple enough to operate that most anyone could do it, as the complications of larger SLRs were removed. At the very least, it was a conversation starter (still is).
The Auto 110 was more affordable than other SLRs, at only $249. The Canon A-1, released the same year, was $625 (with a 50mm lens). Pentax released the iconic K1000 two years prior—in 1976—with an MSRP of $299 (with a 50mm lens), so for just $50 more one could get a much more respectable camera. It’s pretty interestingly if you adjust these numbers for inflation: $249 in 1978 is $1,230 today, $299 is $1,477, and $625 is $3,087! None of these cameras were cheap, not even the Auto 110.
Which brings me to what I want to discuss today, and that’s the cost of the Fujifilm X half. Unless something unexpected happens, this will be the last post about the new camera until after I get back from the B&H BILD Expo next month, so if you are tired of hearing about it, just bear with me a moment—I promise that we’ll get to other things. Let’s dive in!
Probably the biggest criticism of the X half is the price. $850 seems like a lot of money, because it is. The camera is a little expensive. I’ve seen plenty of people say that if it was $400 or $500, that would be the right cost. If it was 2015, I might agree, but there’s been some significant inflation since then. $500 in 2015 is $680 today, which is what I estimate would be a fair price for this camera (I said $700, but close enough). The reality is that things are expensive in 2025. And if you consider that the X half is probably the first to be adjusted for the tariffs, I think it’s more of a foreshadowing of what’s to come across the entire camera market in the coming months.
Yet the X half is still much cheaper—$380 cheaper—than the Pentax Auto 110 was in 1978, accounting for inflation. I knew the late-1970’s were rough economically, but I didn’t realize just how expensive things were. While there is plenty that’s divergent, I see some parallels between the Auto 110 and the X half, namely portability, simplicity, and casual fun. If the X half was transported back in time to 1978, it would sell for $172, which would have been considered a good bargain for the time; however, in 2025, $850 is a lot of money for what it is. Even as prices seem to skyrocket, it’s still much better than it was in the late-1970’s.
So where does that leave us? I think it’s good to have a healthy historical perspective, but that doesn’t help the wallet feel any less empty. I don’t know the future, but I think it’s unlikely that the tariffs are fully settled, and as things fall into place over the coming months, the opportunity to lower the price is a strong possibility. If the camera sells really well, and the backorder list is long, even if Fujifilm could drop the price, they would be silly to do so (but who knows, maybe they will). I don’t see the historic X100VI demand, but all indications are that preorder sales have been strong. I believe that the camera will do quite well for Fujifilm. Time will tell, though.
If you can accept the X half for what it is, and forgive it for not being what it’s not, it could be a really fun camera for capturing everyday moments. It’s not a serious camera for serious photography, yet it is priced nearly as if it is—just like the Pentax Auto 110 was. If you think you’d enjoy it, then consider grabbing one at some point; if not, it’s very easy to pass, and consider a more advanced model instead—you can get a Fujifilm X-T30 II with a lens today for less than a Pentax K1000 with a lens cost in the late-1970’s, adjusting for inflation. There are plenty of options for those that want an enthusiast or pro camera. The X half is one of a kind—the most unique digital camera ever made—and as such, it’s not going to be for everyone, and that’s ok.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
There’s been a lot of negativity within the community about the new Fujifilm X half camera. A lot of positivity, too, but definitely a lot of gloom. I think it stems from a misunderstanding of who the camera is for. Understanding better the intended market segment might help to make sense of the camera. I think it’s also important to state that just because a particular model is not for you personally, doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t exist—if it becomes commercially successful (which I’m confident it will be), that is a strong argument that it should indeed exist because it obviously filled a market void, but maybe just not the particular void affecting you. It’s certainly ok to express your opinions about it, but preferably in a kind and constructive way. Not everything I said was positive because in all honesty, not everything about it is roses and rainbows; however, that doesn’t mean the camera is junk. With that out of the way, let’s get into this.
So who is the Fujifilm X half for? In my opinion, there are several primary groups. And just because someone doesn’t fit any of those groups, that doesn’t mean they won’t buy or appreciate the camera. I think this is a polarizing model that is definitely not for everyone, or even for most people. Some of you will love it, some of you will hate it, and that’s ok. This camera isn’t for everyone who regularly reads this website. In fact, the target audience most likely has never heard of Fuji X Weekly, or is maybe only vaguely familiar (but probably not).
One group is those who have recently discovered the joys of film photography, particularly those who have purchased the Pentax 17 or Kodak H35N—but not exclusively those people. Some have a 35mm point-and-shoot from the ’90’s. Some have been using Fujifilm Quicksnap disposable cameras. Film photography has seen a significant resurgence from the younger generation; however, it’s been hindered by the high cost of film and development, and sometimes the lack of availability. A camera that provides a similar experience and even aesthetic, but with the convenience of digital and with a one-time-fee entry point will be appealing to some of these people.
Another group is the digicam lovers. Surprisingly, the number one digital camera brand in Japan in 2024 was Kodak (actually, JK Imaging using the Kodak brand name). They’re selling a ton of cheap digicams that are basically 15-year-old tech and designs. Nobody in the camera world takes this seriously, but it is a sizable demographic. Retro digicams from 15 or 20 years ago are all the rage right now, too. The X half offers a graduation of sorts for those looking for a more premium option.
A third group is Instax users. Instax is the camera division’s money maker much more than the X-series is. Instant film photography is big and has been for awhile, and Fujifilm is king of the hill. At some point one can outgrow Instax; the Evo series is supposed to help with that, but it’s not a big step. So how can Fujifilm convince Instax photographers to take the leap into the X-series world? With a digital camera that offers a simple and analog-like experience with some Instax compatibility, of course!
In my opinion, those are the three main groups. That’s a pretty large umbrella, and you only need a small portion from each to sell a lot of copies. If you are not in one of those groups, you may still find the camera appealing, and might buy and love it (I might be one of those people); however, you’re not necessarily the target market for the X half. What’s fascinating—genius, really—is that this is a potential stepping stone into the system from the bottom. There’s always a lot of discussions about market share, and convincing those from other brands to join the fold. This camera is intended to bring in outsiders, and grow the brand unconventionally yet organically. Then, later, some of these people will buy an X-M5, X-T50, X100VI, etc., as their second X-series camera. I bet thousands get into the system this way.
Unfortunately, some of those who aren’t the target market have been trashing the camera online (not on this website, but elsewhere), and—much worse—speaking harshly of those who might buy it. My estimation is that the majority of sales will come from first-time Fujifilm photographers. I think it will sell fairly well to the existing X-series customer base because it’s a fun concept, but primarily it’s going to be someone’s first dip into the X-series pool. Instead of degrading these folks for liking and buying the camera, we should gladly welcome them into the community. If they have a good experience, they may just stick around for awhile, and that’s a very good thing for the brand and photography in-general. I think we need to be more welcoming and accepting of these newcomers, and not criticize them for making the purchase. I don’t think anyone here is doing that, but I’ve definitely seen it elsewhere, and it’s not healthy. It’s ok if this camera isn’t for you, but it is certainly for someone, and they’re going to absolutely love it.
Fujifilm announced a new camera last night called X half. It also goes by the name X-HF1, apparently. This is a 32mm (full-frame-equivalent) f/2.8 fixed-lens compact camera with a vertically mounted 1″ sensor, and is probably the most unique digital camera ever made—or, at the least, it offers the most unique photographic experience in all of digital photography. This isn’t a review, but I did want to give my thoughts on the release.
I haven’t used the camera, or even seen it in-person. I was up late last night watching the announcement and various review videos that were published, trying to figure out what this camera is. Now I’m awake typing this article after less than five hours of sleep, so if there are any typos, please excuse me. I’ve barely started my first cup of coffee. Anyway, Fujifilm released two videos, which I’ve included below.
In the weeks leading up to the release, I published two article about the X-HF1, speculating what it might be. The first was Why the Upcoming Fujifilm Half-Frame Camera is Genius, and I guessed that this was going to be an amazing camera, specifically designed for both a film-like photographic experience and recording vertical videos for TikToks and Reels. The second was What if the upcoming Fujifilm Xhalf is something different?, where I second-guessed my prior article, and wondered if the camera was going to be stripped down, less video-centric, and more Instax than X-series. Well, the X half seems to fall right in-between (maybe closer to the second take), and both articles had some things right and some wrong.
The new camera is intended to produce a film-like experience, and is capable of doing so in a unique way. In Film Camera Mode, you choose your “film” (Film Simulation) and how many frames (36, 54, or 72), and then you shoot through the Optical Viewfinder until the roll is fully exposed, using the frame advance lever in-between shots. You cannot see your pictures until after the roll is finished and “developed” in their new app that is just for this camera. I think this is super cool, and I hope this mode comes to some future camera, maybe the upcoming X-E5. There is a missed opportunity: Fujifilm offers photo printing services, so you should be able to order 4″x6″ prints of your roll of “film” from the new app. It would be so much fun to order prints, then wait until they arrive in the mail before reviewing the pictures. It would encourage people to print their photos, which isn’t done nearly enough nowadays. And it would be a way for Fujifilm to make some extra money on a service they already offer. Maybe they’ll update the app to include this in the future, as it seems like an obvious oversight.
The X half has a 20mp 1″ Bayer sensor, but only uses 18mp because it crops out 2mp to accommodate the 3:4 aspect ratio (the sensor is 2:3). If you want to crop your pictures to 2:3, you’ll lose a little more resolution, but it is still plenty for social media and web use, as well as prints smaller than 16″x24″. It would have been nice if one could choose to use the full sensor and the 2:3 aspect ratio, but with the X-HF1, Fujifilm significantly stripped down the menu and customizations. They made the camera about simplicity, but in doing so you lose out on some of what makes Fujifilm cameras special; namely, you cannot use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera, since you cannot control the various parameters like you can on any other X-series model.
Instead of 20 Film Simulations, this camera only has 13: Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Negative, Eterna, Acros, Acros+Y/+R/+G, an Sepia. It’s too bad Sepia made the cut over PRO Neg. Hi, PRO Neg. Std, and Eterna Bleach Bypass. While you cannot use Recipes, the Film Simulations seem to produce a slightly divergent look than the standard Film Sims, almost as if Fujifilm programmed each with its own Recipe, for what that’s worth. There are also so-called Advanced Filters, including a few new ones borrowed from the Instax Evo cameras.
While the X half does shoot vertical video, the quality seems suspect. I’m sure there are some who will appreciate this and will create some interesting content with it, but it’s a big miss in my opinion. They should have allowed 1080p in the 9:16 aspect ratio so it would have been more useful for social media video creation. The X-HF1 could have been a trendy camera for TikToks, Reels, and Shorts, but I just don’t see that happening with the video implementation. The capability of video-video and still-video diptychs are a bit intriguing, but I don’t think that will catch on as anything more than a passing curiosity. Or don’t included video capabilities at all—I think that would have made a bigger statement (and would have been viewed more positively) than how it was implemented.
So what do I make of the X half? It looks nice. It’s very compact, which is perfect for everyday carry or travel. It’s minimalistic, which can be good. It offers a very unique shooting experience that looks like a lot of fun. It seems like a bridge between Instax and the X-series, and I think it’s fair to consider it more like a very-high-end Instax Evo camera without a printer than a bottom-end X-series model (it’s basically both). It will certainly be a very controversial camera (maybe the most), with perhaps the biggest controversy being the price: an MSRP of $850, which seems high for what it is. Some people are going to love it, and some are going to hate it. I think it will be especially popular with Gen Z and Gen Alpha, who are currently fascinated with classic digicams and film cameras, including half-frame models like the Pentax 17. Me? I applaud Fujifilm for daring to be different, and going way outside the box. I did preorder one last night, but I’m a bit unsure if I’m actually going to like it or not. Now excuse me while I pour that second cup of coffee….
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
One of Fujifilm’s most beloved lines is the X-E series. While never the most popular, X-E cameras have a passionate cult-like following. My first Fujifilm camera was an X-E1, so I have a special place in my heart for the line. The X-E4 is currently my favorite for travel photography, especially when paired with pancake lenses. At this time, Fujifilm doesn’t offer an X-E camera—the last one was the X-E4, but it was discontinued over two years ago.
The X-E1, which was announced in the fall of 2012, was a striking camera that caught a lot of people’s attention with its retro styling and compact design; however, there were some initial issues (later rectified via firmware updates) that hindered the perception of it. One year later, Fujifilm released the X-E2, which had a new sensor and was largely free of the problems that had given its predecessor bad press. This was a successful model for Fujifilm, but the X-series was still pretty new, with a small (but quickly growing) market share. The X-E2s was released three years later; it was almost just a firmware update disguised as a new camera, and Fujifilm later gave that same firmware to the X-E2. A lot of people consider the X-E2 and the X-E2s (which had a pretty short run) to be the same camera, because they basically are (although not 100%). In the fall of 2017, Fujifilm announced the X-E3, at a time when the X-series seemed to be hitting its stride, with several commercially successful models coming before (X-Pro2, X100F, X-T2, X-T20). I think there were some high sales expectations for the X-E3; however, demand turned out to be sluggish, and the camera had to be discounted in order to move the inventory. Because it was considered a bit of a “flop” (too many copies were manufactured for the actual demand), there were some rumblings that the X-E3 might be the last model in that series. Thankfully it wasn’t.
White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe
In March of 2021, Fujifilm released the X-E4. I preordered my copy the moment it was announced; if I hadn’t, I might not own one today. Fujifilm used the sales figures of the X-E3 to estimate the demand for its successor, which was a fair assumption, but what they didn’t know is that the X100V was about to go viral, and it was going to take the X-E4 with it. Demand for the X-E4 turned out to be much greater than it had been for the X-E3; however, as luck would have it, this was during the Covid global parts shortage, and Fujifilm had trouble securing materials to manufacture more copies. Two years after it was released, and with a very long backorder list, the camera was discontinued.
Because there was so much unfulfilled demand, the second-hand market for the X-E4 went nuts. It was pretty common to find a used X-E4 selling for 50% more than the MSRP of a new model, and sometimes double. Crazy! If sales had been slow, it very well might have been the final nail in the X-E coffin; however, sales were good, except that Fujifilm discontinued the camera at the peak of its popularity because they ran out of parts. Now, a little over two years later, apparently a new model is forthcoming. Interestingly, in 2023 I predicted that the X-E5 might come in the spring of 2025… not a bad guess, only slightly off. Let me quickly discuss what I hope for with the X-E5.
Beach Chairs – Folly Beach, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Velvia Film
A lot of people wanted to buy the X-E4 but just couldn’t find one in stock, so I wouldn’t change much. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. There are five things I would do different, and otherwise I’d leave it alone. I don’t think Fujifilm needs to reinvent the wheel here.
The five things that I would change, which would make the X-E5 pretty much perfect in my eyes, are simple: use the Shutter/ISO combo dial of the X100/X-Pro series, include an M/C/S switch, include a rear command dial, improve the EVF resolution, and use the X-Processor 5. That’s it. Keep the design the same, keep the sensor the same, use the same battery—keep almost all of it the same. Do this, and it will be a very successful camera.
Some people will demand IBIS and claim that the X-E5 must have it or the camera’s a dud. I don’t care if it does or doesn’t have IBIS, I’m fine either way. For still photography, IBIS is nice, but is oftentimes very overstated. It’s not a critical feature whatsoever for most people and circumstances. It does add weight (and probably size), cost, and battery life—in other words, there are tradeoffs. I’m ok with either choice, but I definitely lean towards its exclusion.
Will it have a small grip like the X-E3? It could, but if it doesn’t have IBIS, it’s lightweight enough that the omission is not a problem (it’s not a problem on the X-E4); personally, I’d welcome it for times when a larger lens is attached to the camera. They could include a built-in flash (the X-E1 and X-E2 had a flash), but it doesn’t bother me even slightly that the X-E4 doesn’t have one. I’d be a little surprised if the X-E5 has the 40mp X-Trans V sensor, but it certainly could. I’m more inclined to believe that it will have the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor like the X-S20 and X-M5, if for no other reason than to keep the cost down. The Film Dial? I like it personally, and I’d be curious to see how it might be implemented, but it doesn’t seem like an easy addition (the EVF is in the way), so I’m guessing no, the camera won’t have it.
One final point I’d like to make in this article is in regards to timing. The X-E1 was the second-to-last X-Trans I camera (X-M1 was last), the X-E2s was the second-to-last X-Trans II camera (X70 was last), the X-E3 was the second-to-last X-Trans III camera (X-H1 was last), and the X-E4 was the second-to-last X-Processor 4 model (X-T30 II was last). Fujifilm has used the X-E series to mark the sunset of each generation, with one camera model to follow. It’s reasonable to assume that we’re nearing the end of the fifth-generation. My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall, and the X-Pro4 (maybe called X-Pro5), which will be the first sixth-generation camera, will be announced in January or February of 2026. I’ve guessed wrong many times before, so take this with a massive grain of salt.
Fujifilm released a new teaser video (which you’ll find below) for the upcoming Xhalf camera, and it is quite interesting, because it showcases camera’s designer. The concept becomes much more clear, even if spoken in vague terms.
First, it starts with clarification: the upcoming camera is indeed X-series. I had wondered if it was going to be X-series, or maybe in the Instax line. Now we know for sure. Perhaps that is an indication that my initial speculation is more likely to be true.
“I personally use both digital and film cameras in various formats,” the product designer states, “ranging from point and shoot to medium format. But specs and tech aren’t always everything. I designed this camera so that you can express yourself in a different way. I hope you will enjoy telling your story with this camera.”
I don’t know if the photos and footage in this video were created using the upcoming camera. Fujirumors thinks that it was, but I couldn’t find anything that says one way or the other. It seems to be, though. The previous teaser video wasn’t, but they also stated that in the description. I think it’s fairly safe to assume that this latest video was indeed created using the new camera, but it’s still a possibility that some or all of it was not.
The photo on the left in the above screenshot caught my attention. It looks a lot like the Fujicolor 100 Gold Film Simulation Recipe. There are some others that can produce a similar look, such as Pacific Blues or Superia Negative (there are a couple others, too), or maybe it’s not one of my Recipes or even a Recipe at all. It doesn’t really mean anything, but I found it interesting nonetheless.
The Xhalf will be announced on May 22 at 1 AM Eastern Time, which is 10 PM Pacific Time on the 21st (just two days from now). I’m pretty excited to learn the specifics about this model, which will certainly be one of the most unique digital cameras ever made. If you are in Los Angeles on the 22nd, be sure to go to the X Summit Experience that Fujifilm is hosting.
Tree of Broken Glass – North Salt Lake, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Ever since I first saw the Fujifilm X100, X-Pro1, and X-E1 in 2011 and 2012, I wanted to buy one. These cameras were significantly different from the other digital models on the market, and seemingly more similar to classic film cameras. I’d see them in various camera magazines, and I’d eagerly read the reviews and study the pictures. I was fairly new to digital photography, having purchased my first DSLR in 2009, but I found the experience frustrating and disappointing. It was so much different than film, and I felt like I was learning photography all over again.
I had been a stubborn digital holdout for a decade, choosing film because I disliked digital. I would brag that I could easily distinguish a digital image from a film photo. But digital technology quickly advanced, becoming better and better. I knew that I needed to get onboard the train before getting completely left behind at the station. Because I had a couple of 35mm Pentax bodies, and you could use K-Mount lenses on Pentax DSLRs, I initially went with that brand. I have absolutely nothing against Pentax (I own a couple of Ricoh GR cameras), but it just wasn’t a good fit for me.
Barn by the Tetons – Grand Teton NP, WY – Fujifilm X-E1
Unfortunately, at the time that the original Fujifilm X-series cameras were released, I could not afford them. They were outside of my budget. Oh, if I just had a few hundred dollars more to spend on a camera, I’d buy one, I would tell myself. However, Fujifilm was just out of reach.
Time went on, and I jumped from brand-to-brand-to-brand, never satisfied with my gear. I thought maybe I was just being discontented, and I should try harder to find gratification with what I had. But contentment seemed illusive. After a number of years, I sold all of my digital gear except for one point-and-shoot digicam and my cellphone (I still had a couple of film cameras), and—for the most part—took a break from photography. Well, that break was short-lived, because I moved to Utah, which is a photographer’s playground, and I couldn’t resist the urge to create photographs.
Bison In The Road – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
This time, I was determined to buy a Fujifilm camera. I had never owned one, and didn’t really know what to expect, but I knew they were different. I couldn’t afford the current offerings, so I purchased a used Fujifilm X-E1, which was now a four-year-old model. The X-Pro2 was brand-new, and I would have loved to buy it, but it was not anywhere near my budget. The current X-E model was the X-E2s, and that was also unattainable for me at the time. Happily, I found an X-E1 that I could afford, so I bought it. The manual controls felt natural and made so much sense to me. I was reminded of why I loved photography. It was instantly clear to me that Fujifilm cameras were what I had been looking for all along.
The purchase of that X-E1 sent me on a path that I’m still on today, and it’s been an incredible journey! To say that it changed my life is a massive understatement, no hyperbole. Although it wasn’t a brand-new camera, I loved it. I have a special place in my heart for the X-E1, and all of the other X-E models, including my Fujifilm X-E4, which is one of my favorite cameras today. I find it sad that Fujifilm is not currently making any X-E bodies (the X-E4 was discontinued two years ago), but I’m hopeful that the series will continue on, and the next iteration isn’t too far out.
Fujifilm recently released the GFX100RF; while the press has been largely positive, there have been a lot of criticisms in the comments section of articles and in forums. The complaints mostly revolve around two things: the lack of IBIS, and a maximum aperture of only f/4. What should Fujifilm do about this?
It’s important to understand that the Fujifilm GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo ever made. It’s the most affordable (aside from used) and portable option for digital medium-format photography. That was Fujifilm’s goal for this model, and they achieved it quite fantastically. With that in mind, all of the positive press is easily understood. So what accounts for all the negative comments? I believe there are a few possible explanations.
First, the GFX system is niche, and is not for everyone. Most photographers don’t need it, but some do, and some who don’t “need” it enjoy GFX anyway; however, it’s not mainstream, and likely never will be. Because the initial expectations were that the GFX100RF was a medium-format X100VI, people thought this was going to be a camera for the masses. It’s not. It’s a niche camera in a niche system. While it might offer the best way to dip your toes into GFX before deciding whether or not to take the plunge, it is not a camera that most will appreciate. It will never sell nearly as many copies as the X100VI (although it could become the best-selling GFX model). Perhaps the comparisons to the X-series camera created some unrealistic expectations. Even though there are some similarities to the X100VI and even the X70, this camera is definitely divergent from both, and those comparisons should be taken with a grain of salt. If the new camera was literally a medium-format X100VI, it would be a lot different, including bulkier and more expensive. Some might want that, but this camera is not a medium-format X100-series model. It should be appreciated for what it is (smallest, lightest, cheapest), and not criticized for not being what it was never intended to be (a medium-format X100VI).
Second, I think most of the complaints are from those who have little or no experience with medium-format cameras, and have unrealistic understandings of the norms and physics of the format. Literally, there are some who have said they’d never buy the camera unless it had an f/1.7 lens. Yeah, Fujifilm could do that, but it would be so large, heavy, and expensive, I doubt anyone would buy. My guess is that the majority of those criticizing the camera were never going to buy it, but were always going to find an excuse to pass. Interestingly, the closest medium-format camera-lens combo in size and weight is the Hasselblad 907X (plus CFV 100C back) with the 28mm f/4 lens—which also lacks IBIS, has an f/4 maximum aperture, and costs nearly twice as much as the GFX100RF.
Which brings me to third: trolls. The internet is full of them, and the Fujifilm community is no exception. In fact, I’d say that the number of trolls lurking around Fujifilm content has dramatically increased over the last couple of years. It doesn’t help that one troll can have many accounts, and use a variety of personas. You might see a whole thread conversion, and not realize that it’s just one person talking to themselves using multiple names. It makes them appear to hold a popular opinion, but in reality most disagree. If you are an internet troll, you quite literally need professional help, and I urge you to seek out the mental health help you obviously desperately need. Interestingly, when you meet photographers in-person, you realize that trolls don’t exist in real life, they’re only on the internet. I met hundreds and hundreds of photographers over the last year, and can attest that none of them are trolls. But go to the comments section of most photography sites (thankfully, not this one), and probably anywhere from a quarter to a half of the comments are from trolls. I’d encourage content creators to crack down on internet trolls—if you don’t put up with them, they tend to go away, which makes the experience better for the real people who want to enjoy your website.
Now, this is what I propose to Fujifilm: make an actual medium-format X100VI. Call it the GFX100RF-XL. Give it a 45mm f/2 lens, or, if that’s just an impossible maximum aperture (which it probably is), go with f/2.8. Give it IBIS and an optical viewfinder (maybe like what’s in the X-Pro2). Yes, the body might need to be 25% or even 50% bigger. The lens would likely be 150% or 200% larger, maybe more. It might weigh twice as much as the GFX100RF. It’ll probably cost three thousand dollars more. But there are a lot of people who claim to want this, so give it to them. Let them have the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. If it’s a big success, then they’ll have proven their criticisms both valid and valuable. Win-win. If the camera struggles to sell well, then Fujifilm knows to ignore those people in the future (so you better pony up if Fujifilm does this!).
I do think it’s worth exploring if the demand is actually real—I believe that some of it is real. There are people who would be all over a medium-format X100VI, despite the size, weight, and cost increase. It would be a dream-come-true for them. Why not find out just how many there are? If money was no object to me, I’d happily own both a GFX100RF and a GFX100RF-XL. At the very least, this camera would grab headlines, and bring attention to the brand. Most likely it won’t sell as many copies as the GFX100RF, but it would likely sell well enough to justify its existence, and become a legendary model in time, if not right away.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Makoto told PetaPixel, “[O]ur first priority was how to make it smaller and lighter weight.” That’s pretty much the entirety of the article, as the rest is simply explaining why the camera does not have IBIS or a larger maximum aperture than f/4 and other design choices. It’s worth reading, if you are curious about those things. The main point: Fujifilm set out to make it as small and lightweight as possible. Interestingly, they did create mockups of versions with IBIS and larger apertures, but it required the camera to be significantly larger and heavier, which went against their “first priority” of small size and less weight. IBIS alone, according to this interview, would have doubled the camera’s size, because the lens would have to project to a much larger area.
The lens is pretty remarkable in that it is extremely compact for medium-format, and it barely covers the sensor. That’s why IBIS wasn’t practical, as it would have required a different and much larger lens. That’s why the maximum aperture is “only” f/4, as a larger aperture would not only have required a larger lens, but it would likely begin to show vignetting and corner softness when wide open. All of the design choices make sense when viewed through the prism of Fujifilm’s top priority: size and weight. The engineers succeeded, and did so quite fantastically.
Now you might disagree with the “first priority” that Fujifilm gave the GFX100RF team. You might not appreciate that the GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo that has ever been made. You might have wished that Fujifilm’s top goal was to make this as premium of a camera as possible, or balanced somewhere in-between premium and size/weight/cost. I think that’s where a lot of the criticisms are found. There are some (quite) vocal critics who disagree with the design ethos, and wished that this camera was different.
This is where the second PetaPixel article comes in. Interestingly, interchangeable-lens camera sales are declining year-over-year, while fixed-lens camera sales are increasing because of a renewed interest in compact cameras. Who is leading the fixed-lens camera market? Kodak. Surprised? It’s JK Imaging selling cheap point-and-shoots on Amazon under the Kodak PixPro name—cameras that are basically 15-year-old tech digicams. Second is Fujifilm, thanks to the massive success of the X100VI, which has already outsold all of the previous X100-series models, and also the Instax Evo line. Canon is third—largely because of their nine-year-old (but still in production) ELPH 360 digicam—but declining (the PowerShot V1 will certainly change that trajectory to some degree). Kenko Tokina is fourth with their tiny toy cameras and digicams. Panasonic is fifth and on the rise, due to the sales success of the DC-ZS99. Ricoh is sixth, thanks to the GR III and GR IIIx, and would probably rank higher if they manufactured those cameras at a higher rate to meet the current demand. Most of the fixed-lens cameras that are selling like hotcakes right now are cheap point-and-shoots; the exceptions are the Fujifilm X100VI and Ricoh GR III/GR IIIx.
If you are trying to understand why Fujifilm chose to make size, weight, and cost the priority for the GFX100RF, that’s why. Simply, it’s market trends. By making the camera as small, lightweight, and affordable as possible, Fujifilm gave it the best chance for market success. The early indicators seem to show that it was the best choice, but only time will tell. That’s not going to make those who wish that Fujifilm had made other aspects—like stabilization and maximum aperture—more important feel any better, but I hope it sheds some light on the why, even if you disagree.
With the massive success of the X100VI, if sales figures for the GFX100RF are good, and if Fujifilm were to release some other fixed-lens option (say, the half-frame camera that’s been rumored), it’s quite possible that Fujifilm will find itself at the very top of the fixed-lens market, which is a growing segment. But, I think it’s also quite possible that, as the months pass by, more and more fixed-lens cameras will be released by other manufacturers, heating up the competition, and making it more difficult to stay on top. Getting quality (and exciting) products out ahead of competitors is going to be a big long-term win for Fujifilm in my opinion; however, predicting the future is impossible, and I’ve certainly been wrong plenty of times before, so who knows? It does seem like smart moves to me, though. Overall, the GFX100RF is likely only going to be a small contributor to Fujifilm’s fixed-lens sales numbers (it’s a $4,900 camera, after all, and GFX models don’t move nearly as quickly as X-series), but it will probably do well for the company’s bottom line, which is good if you’d like to see them continue to make interesting cameras well into the future.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
