Fujifilm Camera

New: Fujifilm X half

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm announced a new camera last night called X half. It also goes by the name X-HF1, apparently. This is a 32mm (full-frame-equivalent) f/2.8 fixed-lens compact camera with a vertically mounted 1″ sensor, and is probably the most unique digital camera ever made—or, at the least, it offers the most unique photographic experience in all of digital photography. This isn’t a review, but I did want to give my thoughts on the release.

I haven’t used the camera, or even seen it in-person. I was up late last night watching the announcement and various review videos that were published, trying to figure out what this camera is. Now I’m awake typing this article after less than five hours of sleep, so if there are any typos, please excuse me. I’ve barely started my first cup of coffee. Anyway, Fujifilm released two videos, which I’ve included below.

In the weeks leading up to the release, I published two article about the X-HF1, speculating what it might be. The first was Why the Upcoming Fujifilm Half-Frame Camera is Genius, and I guessed that this was going to be an amazing camera, specifically designed for both a film-like photographic experience and recording vertical videos for TikToks and Reels. The second was What if the upcoming Fujifilm Xhalf is something different?, where I second-guessed my prior article, and wondered if the camera was going to be stripped down, less video-centric, and more Instax than X-series. Well, the X half seems to fall right in-between (maybe closer to the second take), and both articles had some things right and some wrong.

The new camera is intended to produce a film-like experience, and is capable of doing so in a unique way. In Film Camera Mode, you choose your “film” (Film Simulation) and how many frames (36, 54, or 72), and then you shoot through the Optical Viewfinder until the roll is fully exposed, using the frame advance lever in-between shots. You cannot see your pictures until after the roll is finished and “developed” in their new app that is just for this camera. I think this is super cool, and I hope this mode comes to some future camera, maybe the upcoming X-E5. There is a missed opportunity: Fujifilm offers photo printing services, so you should be able to order 4″x6″ prints of your roll of “film” from the new app. It would be so much fun to order prints, then wait until they arrive in the mail before reviewing the pictures. It would encourage people to print their photos, which isn’t done nearly enough nowadays. And it would be a way for Fujifilm to make some extra money on a service they already offer. Maybe they’ll update the app to include this in the future, as it seems like an obvious oversight.

The X half has a 20mp 1″ Bayer sensor, but only uses 18mp because it crops out 2mp to accommodate the 3:4 aspect ratio (the sensor is 2:3). If you want to crop your pictures to 2:3, you’ll lose a little more resolution, but it is still plenty for social media and web use, as well as prints smaller than 16″x24″. It would have been nice if one could choose to use the full sensor and the 2:3 aspect ratio, but with the X-HF1, Fujifilm significantly stripped down the menu and customizations. They made the camera about simplicity, but in doing so you lose out on some of what makes Fujifilm cameras special; namely, you cannot use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera, since you cannot control the various parameters like you can on any other X-series model.

Instead of 20 Film Simulations, this camera only has 13: Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Negative, Eterna, Acros, Acros+Y/+R/+G, an Sepia. It’s too bad Sepia made the cut over PRO Neg. Hi, PRO Neg. Std, and Eterna Bleach Bypass. While you cannot use Recipes, the Film Simulations seem to produce a slightly divergent look than the standard Film Sims, almost as if Fujifilm programmed each with its own Recipe, for what that’s worth. There are also so-called Advanced Filters, including a few new ones borrowed from the Instax Evo cameras.

While the X half does shoot vertical video, the quality seems suspect. I’m sure there are some who will appreciate this and will create some interesting content with it, but it’s a big miss in my opinion. They should have allowed 1080p in the 9:16 aspect ratio so it would have been more useful for social media video creation. The X-HF1 could have been a trendy camera for TikToks, Reels, and Shorts, but I just don’t see that happening with the video implementation. The capability of video-video and still-video diptychs are a bit intriguing, but I don’t think that will catch on as anything more than a passing curiosity. Or don’t included video capabilities at all—I think that would have made a bigger statement (and would have been viewed more positively) than how it was implemented.

So what do I make of the X half? It looks nice. It’s very compact, which is perfect for everyday carry or travel. It’s minimalistic, which can be good. It offers a very unique shooting experience that looks like a lot of fun. It seems like a bridge between Instax and the X-series, and I think it’s fair to consider it more like a very-high-end Instax Evo camera without a printer than a bottom-end X-series model (it’s basically both). It will certainly be a very controversial camera (maybe the most), with perhaps the biggest controversy being the price: an MSRP of $850, which seems high for what it is. Some people are going to love it, and some are going to hate it. I think it will be especially popular with Gen Z and Gen Alpha, who are currently fascinated with classic digicams and film cameras, including half-frame models like the Pentax 17. Me? I applaud Fujifilm for daring to be different, and going way outside the box. I did preorder one last night, but I’m a bit unsure if I’m actually going to like it or not. Now excuse me while I pour that second cup of coffee….

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X half in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment
Fujifilm X half in charcoal:
Amazon, B&H, Moment
Fujifilm X half in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment

My Hopes for the Fujifilm X-E5

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

One of Fujifilm’s most beloved lines is the X-E series. While never the most popular, X-E cameras have a passionate cult-like following. My first Fujifilm camera was an X-E1, so I have a special place in my heart for the line. The X-E4 is currently my favorite for travel photography, especially when paired with pancake lenses. At this time, Fujifilm doesn’t offer an X-E camera—the last one was the X-E4, but it was discontinued over two years ago.

The X-E1, which was announced in the fall of 2012, was a striking camera that caught a lot of people’s attention with its retro styling and compact design; however, there were some initial issues (later rectified via firmware updates) that hindered the perception of it. One year later, Fujifilm released the X-E2, which had a new sensor and was largely free of the problems that had given its predecessor bad press. This was a successful model for Fujifilm, but the X-series was still pretty new, with a small (but quickly growing) market share. The X-E2s was released three years later; it was almost just a firmware update disguised as a new camera, and Fujifilm later gave that same firmware to the X-E2. A lot of people consider the X-E2 and the X-E2s (which had a pretty short run) to be the same camera, because they basically are (although not 100%). In the fall of 2017, Fujifilm announced the X-E3, at a time when the X-series seemed to be hitting its stride, with several commercially successful models coming before (X-Pro2, X100F, X-T2, X-T20). I think there were some high sales expectations for the X-E3; however, demand turned out to be sluggish, and the camera had to be discounted in order to move the inventory. Because it was considered a bit of a “flop” (too many copies were manufactured for the actual demand), there were some rumblings that the X-E3 might be the last model in that series. Thankfully it wasn’t.

White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe

In March of 2021, Fujifilm released the X-E4. I preordered my copy the moment it was announced; if I hadn’t, I might not own one today. Fujifilm used the sales figures of the X-E3 to estimate the demand for its successor, which was a fair assumption, but what they didn’t know is that the X100V was about to go viral, and it was going to take the X-E4 with it. Demand for the X-E4 turned out to be much greater than it had been for the X-E3; however, as luck would have it, this was during the Covid global parts shortage, and Fujifilm had trouble securing materials to manufacture more copies. Two years after it was released, and with a very long backorder list, the camera was discontinued.

Because there was so much unfulfilled demand, the second-hand market for the X-E4 went nuts. It was pretty common to find a used X-E4 selling for 50% more than the MSRP of a new model, and sometimes double. Crazy! If sales had been slow, it very well might have been the final nail in the X-E coffin; however, sales were good, except that Fujifilm discontinued the camera at the peak of its popularity because they ran out of parts. Now, a little over two years later, apparently a new model is forthcoming. Interestingly, in 2023 I predicted that the X-E5 might come in the spring of 2025… not a bad guess, only slightly off. Let me quickly discuss what I hope for with the X-E5.

Beach Chairs – Folly Beach, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Velvia Film

A lot of people wanted to buy the X-E4 but just couldn’t find one in stock, so I wouldn’t change much. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. There are five things I would do different, and otherwise I’d leave it alone. I don’t think Fujifilm needs to reinvent the wheel here.

The five things that I would change, which would make the X-E5 pretty much perfect in my eyes, are simple: use the Shutter/ISO combo dial of the X100/X-Pro series, include an M/C/S switch, include a rear command dial, improve the EVF resolution, and use the X-Processor 5. That’s it. Keep the design the same, keep the sensor the same, use the same battery—keep almost all of it the same. Do this, and it will be a very successful camera.

Some people will demand IBIS and claim that the X-E5 must have it or the camera’s a dud. I don’t care if it does or doesn’t have IBIS, I’m fine either way. For still photography, IBIS is nice, but is oftentimes very overstated. It’s not a critical feature whatsoever for most people and circumstances. It does add weight (and probably size), cost, and battery life—in other words, there are tradeoffs. I’m ok with either choice, but I definitely lean towards its exclusion.

Tram Track – Houston, TX – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipes

Will it have a small grip like the X-E3? It could, but if it doesn’t have IBIS, it’s lightweight enough that the omission is not a problem (it’s not a problem on the X-E4); personally, I’d welcome it for times when a larger lens is attached to the camera. They could include a built-in flash (the X-E1 and X-E2 had a flash), but it doesn’t bother me even slightly that the X-E4 doesn’t have one. I’d be a little surprised if the X-E5 has the 40mp X-Trans V sensor, but it certainly could. I’m more inclined to believe that it will have the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor like the X-S20 and X-M5, if for no other reason than to keep the cost down. The Film Dial? I like it personally, and I’d be curious to see how it might be implemented, but it doesn’t seem like an easy addition (the EVF is in the way), so I’m guessing no, the camera won’t have it.

One final point I’d like to make in this article is in regards to timing. The X-E1 was the second-to-last X-Trans I camera (X-M1 was last), the X-E2s was the second-to-last X-Trans II camera (X70 was last), the X-E3 was the second-to-last X-Trans III camera (X-H1 was last), and the X-E4 was the second-to-last X-Processor 4 model (X-T30 II was last). Fujifilm has used the X-E series to mark the sunset of each generation, with one camera model to follow. It’s reasonable to assume that we’re nearing the end of the fifth-generation. My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall, and the X-Pro4 (maybe called X-Pro5), which will be the first sixth-generation camera, will be announced in January or February of 2026. I’ve guessed wrong many times before, so take this with a massive grain of salt.

Fujifilm Teases the Upcoming Xhalf in New Video

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm released a new teaser video (which you’ll find below) for the upcoming Xhalf camera, and it is quite interesting, because it showcases camera’s designer. The concept becomes much more clear, even if spoken in vague terms.

First, it starts with clarification: the upcoming camera is indeed X-series. I had wondered if it was going to be X-series, or maybe in the Instax line. Now we know for sure. Perhaps that is an indication that my initial speculation is more likely to be true.

“I personally use both digital and film cameras in various formats,” the product designer states, “ranging from point and shoot to medium format. But specs and tech aren’t always everything. I designed this camera so that you can express yourself in a different way. I hope you will enjoy telling your story with this camera.”

I don’t know if the photos and footage in this video were created using the upcoming camera. Fujirumors thinks that it was, but I couldn’t find anything that says one way or the other. It seems to be, though. The previous teaser video wasn’t, but they also stated that in the description. I think it’s fairly safe to assume that this latest video was indeed created using the new camera, but it’s still a possibility that some or all of it was not.

The photo on the left in the above screenshot caught my attention. It looks a lot like the Fujicolor 100 Gold Film Simulation Recipe. There are some others that can produce a similar look, such as Pacific Blues or Superia Negative (there are a couple others, too), or maybe it’s not one of my Recipes or even a Recipe at all. It doesn’t really mean anything, but I found it interesting nonetheless.

The Xhalf will be announced on May 22 at 1 AM Eastern Time, which is 10 PM Pacific Time on the 21st (just two days from now). I’m pretty excited to learn the specifics about this model, which will certainly be one of the most unique digital cameras ever made. If you are in Los Angeles on the 22nd, be sure to go to the X Summit Experience that Fujifilm is hosting.

Ode to my First Fujifilm Camera

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Tree of Broken Glass – North Salt Lake, UT – Fujifilm X-E1

Ever since I first saw the Fujifilm X100, X-Pro1, and X-E1 in 2011 and 2012, I wanted to buy one. These cameras were significantly different from the other digital models on the market, and seemingly more similar to classic film cameras. I’d see them in various camera magazines, and I’d eagerly read the reviews and study the pictures. I was fairly new to digital photography, having purchased my first DSLR in 2009, but I found the experience frustrating and disappointing. It was so much different than film, and I felt like I was learning photography all over again.

I had been a stubborn digital holdout for a decade, choosing film because I disliked digital. I would brag that I could easily distinguish a digital image from a film photo. But digital technology quickly advanced, becoming better and better. I knew that I needed to get onboard the train before getting completely left behind at the station. Because I had a couple of 35mm Pentax bodies, and you could use K-Mount lenses on Pentax DSLRs, I initially went with that brand. I have absolutely nothing against Pentax (I own a couple of Ricoh GR cameras), but it just wasn’t a good fit for me.

Barn by the Tetons – Grand Teton NP, WY – Fujifilm X-E1

Unfortunately, at the time that the original Fujifilm X-series cameras were released, I could not afford them. They were outside of my budget. Oh, if I just had a few hundred dollars more to spend on a camera, I’d buy one, I would tell myself. However, Fujifilm was just out of reach.

Time went on, and I jumped from brand-to-brand-to-brand, never satisfied with my gear. I thought maybe I was just being discontented, and I should try harder to find gratification with what I had. But contentment seemed illusive. After a number of years, I sold all of my digital gear except for one point-and-shoot digicam and my cellphone (I still had a couple of film cameras), and—for the most part—took a break from photography. Well, that break was short-lived, because I moved to Utah, which is a photographer’s playground, and I couldn’t resist the urge to create photographs.

Bison In The Road – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1

This time, I was determined to buy a Fujifilm camera. I had never owned one, and didn’t really know what to expect, but I knew they were different. I couldn’t afford the current offerings, so I purchased a used Fujifilm X-E1, which was now a four-year-old model. The X-Pro2 was brand-new, and I would have loved to buy it, but it was not anywhere near my budget. The current X-E model was the X-E2s, and that was also unattainable for me at the time. Happily, I found an X-E1 that I could afford, so I bought it. The manual controls felt natural and made so much sense to me. I was reminded of why I loved photography. It was instantly clear to me that Fujifilm cameras were what I had been looking for all along.

The purchase of that X-E1 sent me on a path that I’m still on today, and it’s been an incredible journey! To say that it changed my life is a massive understatement, no hyperbole. Although it wasn’t a brand-new camera, I loved it. I have a special place in my heart for the X-E1, and all of the other X-E models, including my Fujifilm X-E4, which is one of my favorite cameras today. I find it sad that Fujifilm is not currently making any X-E bodies (the X-E4 was discontinued two years ago), but I’m hopeful that the series will continue on, and the next iteration isn’t too far out.

Some People Don’t Like the Fujifilm GFX100RF, This is What Fujifilm Should Do

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm recently released the GFX100RF; while the press has been largely positive, there have been a lot of criticisms in the comments section of articles and in forums. The complaints mostly revolve around two things: the lack of IBIS, and a maximum aperture of only f/4. What should Fujifilm do about this?

It’s important to understand that the Fujifilm GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo ever made. It’s the most affordable (aside from used) and portable option for digital medium-format photography. That was Fujifilm’s goal for this model, and they achieved it quite fantastically. With that in mind, all of the positive press is easily understood. So what accounts for all the negative comments? I believe there are a few possible explanations.

First, the GFX system is niche, and is not for everyone. Most photographers don’t need it, but some do, and some who don’t “need” it enjoy GFX anyway; however, it’s not mainstream, and likely never will be. Because the initial expectations were that the GFX100RF was a medium-format X100VI, people thought this was going to be a camera for the masses. It’s not. It’s a niche camera in a niche system. While it might offer the best way to dip your toes into GFX before deciding whether or not to take the plunge, it is not a camera that most will appreciate. It will never sell nearly as many copies as the X100VI (although it could become the best-selling GFX model). Perhaps the comparisons to the X-series camera created some unrealistic expectations. Even though there are some similarities to the X100VI and even the X70, this camera is definitely divergent from both, and those comparisons should be taken with a grain of salt. If the new camera was literally a medium-format X100VI, it would be a lot different, including bulkier and more expensive. Some might want that, but this camera is not a medium-format X100-series model. It should be appreciated for what it is (smallest, lightest, cheapest), and not criticized for not being what it was never intended to be (a medium-format X100VI).

Second, I think most of the complaints are from those who have little or no experience with medium-format cameras, and have unrealistic understandings of the norms and physics of the format. Literally, there are some who have said they’d never buy the camera unless it had an f/1.7 lens. Yeah, Fujifilm could do that, but it would be so large, heavy, and expensive, I doubt anyone would buy. My guess is that the majority of those criticizing the camera were never going to buy it, but were always going to find an excuse to pass. Interestingly, the closest medium-format camera-lens combo in size and weight is the Hasselblad 907X (plus CFV 100C back) with the 28mm f/4 lens—which also lacks IBIS, has an f/4 maximum aperture, and costs nearly twice as much as the GFX100RF.

Which brings me to third: trolls. The internet is full of them, and the Fujifilm community is no exception. In fact, I’d say that the number of trolls lurking around Fujifilm content has dramatically increased over the last couple of years. It doesn’t help that one troll can have many accounts, and use a variety of personas. You might see a whole thread conversion, and not realize that it’s just one person talking to themselves using multiple names. It makes them appear to hold a popular opinion, but in reality most disagree. If you are an internet troll, you quite literally need professional help, and I urge you to seek out the mental health help you obviously desperately need. Interestingly, when you meet photographers in-person, you realize that trolls don’t exist in real life, they’re only on the internet. I met hundreds and hundreds of photographers over the last year, and can attest that none of them are trolls. But go to the comments section of most photography sites (thankfully, not this one), and probably anywhere from a quarter to a half of the comments are from trolls. I’d encourage content creators to crack down on internet trolls—if you don’t put up with them, they tend to go away, which makes the experience better for the real people who want to enjoy your website.

Now, this is what I propose to Fujifilm: make an actual medium-format X100VI. Call it the GFX100RF-XL. Give it a 45mm f/2 lens, or, if that’s just an impossible maximum aperture (which it probably is), go with f/2.8. Give it IBIS and an optical viewfinder (maybe like what’s in the X-Pro2). Yes, the body might need to be 25% or even 50% bigger. The lens would likely be 150% or 200% larger, maybe more. It might weigh twice as much as the GFX100RF. It’ll probably cost three thousand dollars more. But there are a lot of people who claim to want this, so give it to them. Let them have the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. If it’s a big success, then they’ll have proven their criticisms both valid and valuable. Win-win. If the camera struggles to sell well, then Fujifilm knows to ignore those people in the future (so you better pony up if Fujifilm does this!).

I do think it’s worth exploring if the demand is actually real—I believe that some of it is real. There are people who would be all over a medium-format X100VI, despite the size, weight, and cost increase. It would be a dream-come-true for them. Why not find out just how many there are? If money was no object to me, I’d happily own both a GFX100RF and a GFX100RF-XL. At the very least, this camera would grab headlines, and bring attention to the brand. Most likely it won’t sell as many copies as the GFX100RF, but it would likely sell well enough to justify its existence, and become a legendary model in time, if not right away.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100RF in black:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira, WEX
Fujifilm GFX100RF in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira, WEX
Fujifilm X100VI in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex, Nuzira
Fujifilm X100VI in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex, Nuzira

Why Fujifilm made the GFX100RF so small and lightweight

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

PetaPixel posted a couple of articles relating—directly and indirectly—to the Fujifilm GFX100RF, which I found quite interesting. In the first, Every Design Decision on the Fujifilm GFX100RF Was Made to Keep It Compact, they interviewed Makoto Oishi, a Product Planning Manager at Fujifilm, to discuss the ethos of the new camera’s design. In the second article, Compact and Interchangeable Lens Camera Demand Is Diverging, PetaPixel looks at a BCN+R report about market trends between fixed-lens and interchangeable-lens models.

Makoto told PetaPixel, “[O]ur first priority was how to make it smaller and lighter weight.” That’s pretty much the entirety of the article, as the rest is simply explaining why the camera does not have IBIS or a larger maximum aperture than f/4 and other design choices. It’s worth reading, if you are curious about those things. The main point: Fujifilm set out to make it as small and lightweight as possible. Interestingly, they did create mockups of versions with IBIS and larger apertures, but it required the camera to be significantly larger and heavier, which went against their “first priority” of small size and less weight. IBIS alone, according to this interview, would have doubled the camera’s size, because the lens would have to project to a much larger area.

The lens is pretty remarkable in that it is extremely compact for medium-format, and it barely covers the sensor. That’s why IBIS wasn’t practical, as it would have required a different and much larger lens. That’s why the maximum aperture is “only” f/4, as a larger aperture would not only have required a larger lens, but it would likely begin to show vignetting and corner softness when wide open. All of the design choices make sense when viewed through the prism of Fujifilm’s top priority: size and weight. The engineers succeeded, and did so quite fantastically.

Driveway – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 30mm f/3.5 – Superia Negative Recipe

Now you might disagree with the “first priority” that Fujifilm gave the GFX100RF team. You might not appreciate that the GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo that has ever been made. You might have wished that Fujifilm’s top goal was to make this as premium of a camera as possible, or balanced somewhere in-between premium and size/weight/cost. I think that’s where a lot of the criticisms are found. There are some (quite) vocal critics who disagree with the design ethos, and wished that this camera was different.

This is where the second PetaPixel article comes in. Interestingly, interchangeable-lens camera sales are declining year-over-year, while fixed-lens camera sales are increasing because of a renewed interest in compact cameras. Who is leading the fixed-lens camera market? Kodak. Surprised? It’s JK Imaging selling cheap point-and-shoots on Amazon under the Kodak PixPro name—cameras that are basically 15-year-old tech digicams. Second is Fujifilm, thanks to the massive success of the X100VI, which has already outsold all of the previous X100-series models, and also the Instax Evo line. Canon is third—largely because of their nine-year-old (but still in production) ELPH 360 digicam—but declining (the PowerShot V1 will certainly change that trajectory to some degree). Kenko Tokina is fourth with their tiny toy cameras and digicams. Panasonic is fifth and on the rise, due to the sales success of the DC-ZS99. Ricoh is sixth, thanks to the GR III and GR IIIx, and would probably rank higher if they manufactured those cameras at a higher rate to meet the current demand. Most of the fixed-lens cameras that are selling like hotcakes right now are cheap point-and-shoots; the exceptions are the Fujifilm X100VI and Ricoh GR III/GR IIIx.

If you are trying to understand why Fujifilm chose to make size, weight, and cost the priority for the GFX100RF, that’s why. Simply, it’s market trends. By making the camera as small, lightweight, and affordable as possible, Fujifilm gave it the best chance for market success. The early indicators seem to show that it was the best choice, but only time will tell. That’s not going to make those who wish that Fujifilm had made other aspects—like stabilization and maximum aperture—more important feel any better, but I hope it sheds some light on the why, even if you disagree.

With the massive success of the X100VI, if sales figures for the GFX100RF are good, and if Fujifilm were to release some other fixed-lens option (say, the half-frame camera that’s been rumored), it’s quite possible that Fujifilm will find itself at the very top of the fixed-lens market, which is a growing segment. But, I think it’s also quite possible that, as the months pass by, more and more fixed-lens cameras will be released by other manufacturers, heating up the competition, and making it more difficult to stay on top. Getting quality (and exciting) products out ahead of competitors is going to be a big long-term win for Fujifilm in my opinion; however, predicting the future is impossible, and I’ve certainly been wrong plenty of times before, so who knows? It does seem like smart moves to me, though. Overall, the GFX100RF is likely only going to be a small contributor to Fujifilm’s fixed-lens sales numbers (it’s a $4,900 camera, after all, and GFX models don’t move nearly as quickly as X-series), but it will probably do well for the company’s bottom line, which is good if you’d like to see them continue to make interesting cameras well into the future.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100RF in black:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira, WEX
Fujifilm GFX100RF in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira, WEX

New: Fujifilm GFX100RF — First Ever Fixed-Lens GFX

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm just announced this morning the brand-new GFX100RF, the first ever fixed-lens compact digital medium-format camera. This new camera uses the same 100mp sensor found in the GFX100 II and GFX100S II, and has a built-in 35mm (28mm full-frame-equivalent, or 18mm APS-C-equivalent) f/4 lens. All for only $4,899! There are several things that make this new camera special—plus a couple that don’t—so let’s dive right in.

The Fujifilm GFX100RF is the most portable digital medium-format camera ever made. It’s the most lightweight digital medium-format camera/lens combination, and it’s the smallest GFX. It’s probably the smallest medium-format, but it depends on how exactly you define smallest. The Hasselblad 907X (plus CFV 100C back) with the 28mm f/4 lens was previously considered the smallest and lightest, and while it might arguably be the “smallest” (it is less wide, but deeper), it is no longer the lightest. For portability, the GFX100RF is the best option in medium-format, making it a compelling camera for travel or even everyday carry.

A few months ago I purchased my first GFX camera, the GFX100S II, with the specific purpose of creating XPan panoramic images that I want to print large. One problem with GFX in general is the size and heft of the gear, which do not lend themselves well for lugging all over the place. Of course, Ansel Adams and the great photographers of the past would laugh at that. While I much prefer smaller gear for travel, I “need” to bring my GFX100S II for the XPan pictures. The 40mp sensor in my X-series cameras produces plenty of resolution for the XPan crop, but it is not quite enough for how large I hope to print. The GFX100RF would be perfect for this, except that I just dropped a ton of money on a GFX camera and a couple lenses back in December.

Which brings me to point number two: the GFX100RF is the cheapest way to get into digital medium-format photography, aside from buying used. If you’ve wanted to get into digital medium-format but have been priced out, this new camera might be for you. It wasn’t even a decade ago that it would cost you at least $10,000 for just the camera body, and thousands more for a lens. Now the entry fee is only $5,000, and that includes the lens! Most people, though, don’t need so much resolution, and medium-format is far more of a luxury than a need.

Another unfortunate aspect of the GFX system is the lack of retro-styled cameras with the traditional tactile controls that Fujifilm is known for. This not only makes the cameras stylish, but also fun, and (IMHO) more functional. The long-discontinued GFX50R is the only other option, so this type of design is long-overdue. Thankfully, Fujifilm is bringing it back to GFX! I bet if this camera does well, there will be more retro-styled models in the future—perhaps a GFX100R.

The GFX100RF has a couple of unique features. One is an aspect ratio knob, which also includes a couple of new aspect ratios not typical found on Fujifilm cameras. Now you can choose between 4:3, 5:4, 1:1, 3:2, 7:6, 65:24, 17:6, and 16:9, and you can switch between those without digging through the menu. Another is a digital teleconverter, with a wheel that shuffles through the options: 45mm, 63mm, and 80mm (I’m not sure if those crops are GFX focal-length measurements or full-frame). Also, interestingly, the GFX100RF uses the same 49mm filter thread size as the X100-series. I can’t say this with 100% confidence, but I’m pretty sure the WCL-X100 and TCL-X100 will work on the new camera (this is mere speculation), which is absolutely amazing if they do; however, I doubt that they are officially supported, and they may not cover the entire frame. Oh, and the GFX100RF is the first GFX model with a leaf shutter, which is especially useful for high speed flash sync.

Now onto a couple of negatives. I’ve covered these before (here and here), so I’ll try to make this quick. I think the camera will be well-received and well-loved, and these two issues will prove to be relatively minor in the long run.

First is the lack of IBIS. An expensive camera lacking IBIS in 2025 is a shocker for some. There are photographers who consider it an essential feature, and won’t buy a camera without it. I’m not in that camp personally. This isn’t a video-centric model, and it has a wide-angle lens, so it doesn’t really need IBIS. Sure, it would be nice to have, but it would have made the camera larger, heavier, and more expensive (at least a little). Two of the biggest selling points (portability and price) would have taken a bit of a hit. I’m sure Fujifilm debated extensively internally if it should have it or not, and ultimately they chose to exclude IBIS for the reasons I just stated. I would have been happy with or without stabilization, as it’s just not a big deal on a camera like this; however, those who do believe it is an essentially feature will likely pass.

Second is the maximum aperture of only f/4, which is not particularly impressive. While f/4 is common on medium-format, it’s not especially bright, which will make the camera less practical after the sun goes down or in dimly lit indoor situations. Generally speaking, shallow depth-of-field isn’t a major focus of wide-angle lens photography, but for those wondering, f/4 on GFX has a similar depth-of-field as f/2 on the X-series. The GFX100RF is more of an “f/8 and be there” camera, so I don’t think the small maximum aperture will be a problem for most people and situations.

That’s my analysis of the new camera. I think many will order it for its portability, price, and style. It’s not a camera that most people need, but I bet it will be highly desired. I want one! I kind of wish I had waited to jump into GFX, because if I hadn’t purchased a GFX100S II a few months ago I would have ordered the GFX100RF today. Instead, I will have to save up and wait. Oh, well. Whenever the opportunity comes to buy the camera, I’m certain that I will be thrilled with it. I’m sure those who have already preordered the camera will love it when it arrives next month.

You can preorder the Fujifilm GFX100RF today. I’ve heard there has already been a lot of preorders, so don’t be surprised if there is a bit of a wait before your order ships. The camera will officially be released and ship on April 24th.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100RF in black:
Amazon, B&H
Fujifilm GFX100RF in silver:
Amazon, B&H

Fujifilm X100VI Already Surpassing the Lifetime Production of the X100V

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

While at the CP+ Show in Japan, PetaPixel interviewed Yuji Igarashi, who is the General Manager of the Professional Imaging Group, Imaging Solutions Division, of the Fujifilm Corporation. He said some interesting things regarding the Fujifilm X100VI production situation. Now, it’s important to take it with a grain of salt. Sometimes people will harshly judge an interpretation of what someone said in a different language, lacking grace for interpretation errors and dialect and cultural differences. Keeping that in mind, let’s get into it.

“We’ve more than doubled our production compared to the previous model,” Yuji Igarashi stated. “But on top of that, we are also still increasing production. Now we can produce higher than [15,000 units per month] and we have been, but it’s not like we can produce double that [amount again].”

Not much new there. Fujifilm told us from the outset that they had doubled production from the previous model, from 7,500 units per month to 15,000. We also already knew that for a year now they have been trying to increase production further. Fujifilm told PetaPixel that they have been unable to accomplish 30,000 units per month, but they are definitely beyond 15,000.

“We’ve been doing what we can to increase our production for the X100VI,” Yuji explained, “but the processes are quite complicated—especially for pieces like the top plate. To make these sharp edges, it goes through many processes. So, this type of camera is not so suited for ramping up production.” In other words, they’re doing all that they can, but there are significant challenges that prevent them from churning out even more cameras.

“In one year since we launched this product,” Yuji continued, “compared to the previous models which took us to sell three or four years, we’ve already shipped an equivalent amount.” This was shocking to me. Fujifilm is stating that—even with the manufacturing limitations—they have already built and delivered as many X100VI’s, which was released just one year ago, as the previous iteration over nearly a four year period. Just as many people have an X100VI in their hands as have an X100V, yet it only took Fujifilm one year to do that for the new camera vs four years for the X100V. And it’s a similar situation for the X100F and the previous versions.

This completely shreds the (quite stupid) theory that Fujifilm is purposefully creating shortages in order to manipulate the market. The unprecedented demand of the X100VI was and is real. No camera has been as in-demand as the X100VI ever. In all of history, no model from any brand received more preorders than the X100VI, it’s not even close. Despite building a ton of copies, Fujifilm has not yet met the initial demand, but they’re getting close. “So I know people are quite frustrated when they say it’s still not available,” Yuji said. “I think one issue is that the first-day orders were so big when it was announced, that’s why people say they’ve been waiting for eight, or 10 months, which we totally understand is so frustrating. So until we clear that, some people will still continue to say, ‘We’ve been waiting for 10 months.'”

Now you might say that the math isn’t mathing. If Fujifilm hasn’t been able to quadruple production, how could they possibly build as many units in one year as they did over nearly four? First, Fujifilm produced a bunch of copies in the months prior to the camera’s announcement, in anticipation of strong initial demand. Also, the X100V was effected by the pandemic parts shortage, which for a time limited the number of copies they could manufacture. If Fujifilm managed to make (say) 300,000 units, that would likely be close to the total number of X100V’s manufactured in total. And that 300K guesstimate might be in the ballpark. We know that 180,000 were manufactured at a minimum post launch, and 60,000 might have been manufactured prior to launch. If Fujifilm has been able to increase production by 6,000 units on average over the last 10 months, then you’d have 300K. While that’s a lot of cameras, apparently there were around 500,000 day-one preorders in China alone, so the initial demand has still not been met a whole year later.

Thankfully, slowly but surely Fujifilm is catching up. Here and there the X100VI has been seen in-stock at camera stores, particularly the black version. If you want to buy one, the wait isn’t nearly as long now. You might still have to be patient for a month or maybe a few, but the 10-month-long waits are in the past. It’s a good time to get your order in if you’ve been waiting. Or, if you’ve been hoping to find it at a local camera store, they might just have one right now—maybe.

The challenge for Fujifilm is to tread carefully on production numbers. If they suddenly find that the demand has been met, and they’re building over 20,000 units per month, they could end up overproducing a lot of copies. Since it takes months from the time parts are ordered until finished cameras are delivered, if the market suddenly shifts, it’s possible that Fujifilm could manufacture a hundred thousand copies more than are needed and can be sold. That amount of overproduction would be a tough blow to the bottom line, and possible could cripple the camera division. As wait times dwindle, Fujifilm should strongly considered reducing the number of units that they manufacture monthly. At some point, 15,000 copies each month will be much too much. Hopefully that is a long ways off, but it will arrive eventually, and it will need to be handled quite carefully when it approaches.

See also: Evergreen + Fuji X Weekly Protective Case for Fujifilm X100VI / X100V / X100F

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X100VI in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex, Nuzira
Fujifilm X100VI in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex, Nuzira

News: Fujifilm X Summit in Prague + Las Vegas X Summit Experience

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

In just 10 days—on March 20th—Fujifilm will announce a new product, purportedly a fixed-lens GFX camera, in Prague. This X Summit takes place at 11:00 AM local in the Czech Republic, which is 2:00 AM Pacific Time and 5:00 AM Eastern Time in the United States. I won’t be awake for that. By the time I brew my first cup of coffee, the camera will have been long announced, and preorders already open. If you want to get this camera right away, my recommendation is to set your alarm clock.

Since most Americans will be fast asleep when the announcement happens, Fujifilm North America is having their own party, which they’re calling an X Summit Experience, in Las Vegas at the WPPI Expo. This will be at 10:30 AM Pacific Time on the 20th. If you are in the Las Vegas area, I’m sure it will be worthwhile to stop by—just be sure to register.

Fujifilm did something similar to this with the launch of the X-T50 and GFX100S II. The X Summit for that was in Australia, which was the middle of the night for most of America. So they had an X Summit Experience on a Manhattan rooftop later in the day to celebrate the announcements. I was invited to be a part of that, and it was a ton of fun. So definitely, if you are in Vegas on the 20th, be sure to go. Unfortunately, I won’t be there for this one.

It’s possible that more than one thing will be announced at this X Summit. Four products—two cameras and two lenses—were unveiled at the Sydney X Summit in 2024; however, since nothing has leaked, I would be surprised if anything else was officially announced. But, I do suspect there could be some extras, such as a future product tease, and/or more info on the upcoming GFX Eterna cinema camera. I won’t catch it live, but will probably watch it on YouTube later in the day.

See also:
WCL-X100 & TCL-X100 for GFX??!!
Is $5,000 a Bargain or Bust?
Is IBIS Really Necessary? Is F/4 too Small?
10 Frames in New Mexico — Fujifilm GFX100S II XPan Photographs
Fujifilm Grain Comparison: GFX100S II vs. X-T5
Film Simulation Recipes for Fujifilm GFX Cameras

Hidden Gems: Underrated Fujifilm Cameras for SOOC Photography

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm is renown in the photography world for blending modern technology with vintage styling, delivering an experience similar to classic film cameras with colors inspired by analog looks. While newer models often steal the spotlight, some older Fujifilm cameras remain hidden gems—overlooked, yet still highly capable. These cameras seem to pair especially well with my Film Simulation Recipes for straight-out-of-camera photos that don’t require editing. If you’re looking for a capable, budget-friendly camera that embraces the magic of Fujifilm’s film simulations, consider these four hidden treasures.

Fujifilm X-T1: The Classic Workhorse

Released in 2014, the Fujifilm X-T1 was a game-changer for the X-series. It introduced the rugged, SLR-style design with dedicated dials that many Fujifilm photographers love. With a 16mp X-Trans II sensor, the X-T1 may not have all the latest film simulations and JPEG options, or stats that impress compared to the latest models, but don’t let that fool you—it still produces fantastic images in 2025.

This was one of the first cameras with Classic Chrome, which is the long-time most popular film simulation for those who use Recipes. Kodachrome II, Kodachrome 64, Classic Kodak Chrome, and Kodacolor are a few of the Classic Chrome Recipes that work beautifully on the X-T1, producing a vintage film-like aesthetic straight-out-of-camera. The Fujifilm X-T1 is an excellent introduction to the Fujifilm experience without breaking the bank, and it’s easy to recommend as someone’s first interchangeable-lens model to learn photography on.

Fujifilm X-T1 & Kodak Portra 160 Recipe
Fujifilm X-T1 & Kodak Portra 160 Recipe
Fujifilm X-T1 & Ektachrome 100SW Recipe

Fujifilm X-Pro2: The Soul of Film Photography

The Fujifilm X-Pro2 is a dream camera for photographers who love the rangefinder experience. Introduced in 2016, it was the first Fujifilm camera with the 24mp X-Trans III sensor and the first to feature Acros, one of my favorite film simulations. This camera was a notable step forward in emulating film-like results thanks to added JPEG options like faux grain. Of the three X-Pro iterations, the X-Pro2 is my personal favorite.

This camera is a fantastic choice for those who want an analog-like shooting experience. With its optical/electronic hybrid viewfinder and vintage aesthetics, it feels like using an old film camera. Recipes like Vintage Kodachrome, Kodachrome II, Kodak Gold 200, and Acros Push Process (to name a few) look great on the X-Pro2. This camera is especially great for manual vintage lenses, which makes the experience even more retro.

Fujifilm X-Pro2 & Kodachrome II Recipe
Fujifilm X-Pro2 & Provia Slide Recipe
Fujifilm X-Pro2 & Acros Recipe

Fujifilm X-T20: The Compact Powerhouse

When I met Omar Gonzalez on a Manhattan rooftop last year, he seemingly wasn’t carrying a camera. So I asked him if he brought one with him, and, if so, which one? He smiled, and pulled out of his sweater pocket a Fujifilm X-T20. He then told me that the X-T20 is his everyday casual camera for just walking around with. That should speak volumes. He also mentioned that the C1-C7 Custom Setting Presets were filled with Fuji X Weekly Recipes.

With the same X-Trans III sensor as the X-Pro2 and X-T2, the Fujifilm X-T20 offers exceptional image quality in a more compact, lightweight body—ideal for street photographers, travelers, and creatives on the go. Despite its size, the X-T20 retains the essential dials that make Fujifilm cameras so enjoyable to use. Recipes like Provia Slide, Everyday Astia, Agfa Optima, and Agfa Scala produce stunning yet nostalgic images on this camera. The X-T20 is an excellent choice for photographers who want a mix of convenience, quality, and affordability.

Fujifilm X-T20 & Kodachrome II Recipe
Fujifilm X-T20 & Velvia Recipe
Fujifilm X-T20 & Fujicolor Pro 400H Recipe

Fujifilm X30: The Forgotten Compact

The Fujifilm X30 might just be the most underrated Fujifilm camera. This fixed-lens compact camera from 2014 features a 2/3-inch 12mp X-Trans II sensor and a 28-112mm (full-frame-equivalent) f/2.0-2.8 lens that has a lot of character. It’s small size is ideal for everyday carry, yet it is quite versatile thanks to the zoom lens.

The pictures from this camera are amazing, with a ton of character—I especially love the lens flare. The photos are instant memories, and that’s the selling point of the X30, as the spec sheet is not especially impressive, and the camera seems a bit outdated in 2025. Recipes like Pro Film, Lomography Color 100, CineStill 800T, and Monochrome Red are excellent options. The X30 is an everyday-carry camera—just grab it while heading out the door on ordinary outings.

Fujifilm X30 & Kodachrome 64 Recipe
Fujifilm X30 & Pro Film Recipe
Fujifilm X30 & CineStill 800T Recipe

Conclusion

While the latest Fujifilm cameras have more features and film simulations, these four underrated models remain exceptional tools for photographers who appreciate the magic of film simulations and Recipes. Each one offers a unique experience: the rugged reliability of the X-T1, the rangefinder soul of the X-Pro2, the compact power of the X-T20, and the travel-friendly versatility of the X30.

When paired with the right Film Simulation Recipes, these cameras prove that you don’t need the newest gear to get great results. If you’re looking for a Fujifilm camera that delivers timeless images and an engaging shooting experience, don’t overlook these hidden gems. You might just discover your new favorite camera.

Find these Film Simulation Recipes in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

Introducing the Fuji X Weekly + WEX Photo Video Fujifilm X-T50 Collaborative Bundle

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Last year, WEX Photo Video asked if I’d be interested in assembling a Fujifilm-related camera bundle. It could be anything that I wanted, just as long as the products made sense together. I decided on a first-time-Fujifilm type of kit. If you are in the market for your very first Fujifilm camera, this bundle would serve as an excellent all-in-one starting point.

The camera I chose for this bundle is the Fujifilm X-T50. It’s simple and fun enough for beginners, yet sophisticated and capable enough for advanced users—in other words, the camera will keep up with you as you grow. No matter where you are on your photographic journey—from brand-new hobbyist to experienced pro—the Fujifilm X-T50 is an excellent camera, so it’s easy to recommend. The silver version is my favorite, so that’s what I chose for the bundle.

“Fuji X Weekly is an amazing resource for photography enthusiasts, especially those diving into the world of Fujifilm. Created by Ritchie Roesch, Fuji X Weekly has become the go-to for Fujifilm photographers looking to explore their camera’s potential. Known for its collection of Film Simulation Recipes, Fuji X Weekly empowers users to recreate the iconic looks of classic film stocks directly in their cameras without the need for post-processing. This bundle celebrates the creativity that Fuji X Weekly represents and is picked by Ritchie to offer you a perfect starting point to explore the Fujifilm system and capture stunning images with ease.”

—Wex Photo Video

What’s a camera without a lens? The Fujinon 35mm f/2 is one of my favorites. It’s small, lightweight, optically excellent, and affordable. I’ve owned this lens for a long time, and still use it regularly. On X-series cameras, because of the APS-C crop factor, it’s a “nifty-fifty” standard prime, something every photographer should have, and the perfect lens for learning composition. The silver version of the Fujinon 35mm f/2 looks strikingly good on the silver X-T50.

To complete the kit, included is a spare NP-W126S battery, SanDisk Extreme 256GB SD Card, and SmallRig Leather Half Case. A memory card is essential to get started, and this SanDisk is one that I personally have in a few of my cameras. The extra battery isn’t essential, but very nice to have—especially for traveling—so I wanted it included. The SmallRig Half Case adds a little style and extra protection.

Altogether, these five items—silver Fujifilm X-T50 camera, silver Fujinon 23mm f/2 lens, spare battery, 256GB SD Card, and leather half case—is an excellent kit for someone just getting started with Fujifilm. With this bundle, you’re good to go—there’s nothing else you need to buy to begin your photographic journey.

This Fuji X Weekly + Wex Photo Video collaborative bundle is not available anywhere else. Fujifilm doesn’t offer the X-T50 and 35mm f/2 as a kit (they should!). The only place you can get these bundled together is at Wex. Right now, this kit is only £1,661.90 (about $2,100 USD). The MSRP for these five items, if purchased separately, is £1,841.90; however, because the X-T50 and 35mm lens are currently on sale, the price is £180 less. There’s no extra discount for purchasing these items together; this is meant to simplify the purchasing process for someone in the market for their first Fujifilm camera.

Fuji X Weekly + Wex Photo Video Fujifilm X-T50 Collaborative Bundle
Included:
– Silver Fujifilm X-T50 camera
– Silver Fujinon 35mm f/2 lens
– Spare NP-W126S battery
– SanDisk 256GB SD Card
– Small Rig Leather Half Case

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

See also:
Fujifilm X-T50 — The “Digital Film” Camera — But who is it for?
Fujifilm X-T50 Film Dial Settings + 14 New Film Simulation Recipes
Putting the Film Dial to Practice — Four Cities with the Fujifilm X-T50

Find nearly 400 Film Simulation Recipes for Fujifilm cameras in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

Is IBIS Really Necessary? Is F/4 too Small?

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

There’s been a lot of discussions about the rumored upcoming Fujifilm GFX100RF, which might get announced next month. Supposedly, it will be a compact 100mp medium-format fixed-lens camera similar to the X100-series and about the size of an X-Pro3. It won’t have IBIS, and the lens will be 35mm f/4, which are major points of contention for some. I figured that this might be a good opportunity to explore if those two design choices will be crippling for the camera, or if it is much ado about nothing.

I don’t have any inside information on the upcoming camera. Fujifilm hasn’t shared anything about it with me, not even if there is a camera forthcoming. I only know as much as the next person, and what I do know I read on Fujirumors. Patrick has a pretty solid track record, so there’s a good chance that everything he has shared about the camera is correct, but until it is announced by Fujifilm, nothing can be known with 100% certainty. In other words, anytime that we’re discussing rumors, it should be taken with a grain of salt.

Personally, I’m really excited for the GFX100RF. I believe that an X100-like GFX camera is going to be a major success for Fujifilm. While I don’t anticipate it being as viral as the X100VI, I do think it will have strong demand. It’s also about time that Fujifilm offers a GFX camera with manual tactile controls (is not PASM). The only other one is the long-discontinued GFX50R. If the GFX100RF is a big success, I bet that Fujifilm will begin work on a long-hoped-for GFX50R successor. If sales of the GFX100RF turn out to be disappointing, I don’t anticipate a retro-styled GFX camera for a long time, if ever. In my opinion, this is a crucial release, a lot hinges on it.

Fujifilm GFX100S II & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/4 – PRO Negative 160C

The upcoming GFX100RF will essentially be the digital version of the Fujifilm GA645W, a fixed-lens 120 film camera from the 1990’s. The GA645W has a 45mm f/5.6 lens, which is 25mm full-frame-equivalent, and with a depth-of-field similar to f/3.2. The GFX100RF will have a 35mm f/4 lens, which is 28mm full-frame-equivalent, and with a depth-of-field similar to f/3.2. It’s not quite as wide as the GA645W, but pretty close. The Fujifilm X70, with its 18.5mm (28mm full-frame-equivalent) lens, might also be considered comparable.

Some people have said that f/4 is much too small for a maximum aperture on the upcoming GFX camera, since f/4 is not especially impressive. Unfortunately, a larger maximum aperture lens would require the camera to be bigger and heavier. Would an f/2.8 lens be nice? For sure, yes. But, at what cost? I’m sure Fujifilm was faced with a lot of difficult choices as they developed the prototype, and as they weighed the pros and cons, they made what they felt were the best decisions. So we have f/4, which is not uncommon for GFX. I count six GF lenses in the current lineup with a maximum aperture of f/4, plus two at f/3.5, and four with a maximum aperture smaller than f/4. Only five GF lenses have a maximum aperture larger than f/3.5. The decision to go with f/4 should not be all that surprising, and I doubt many—if any—in the GFX world were shocked by it.

Fujifilm GFX100S II at ISO 6400 & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/4 – Kodak Tri-X 400

GFX cameras are good for high-ISO photography. It’s kind of a paradox of digital medium-format: it’s good that it’s better at high-ISOs, because you’re going to need it, since the maximum apertures are typically not as large as smaller sensor formats. There are pros and cons to everything. Unsurprisingly, you’re going to find tradeoffs. It is what it is.

Not all Fujifilm cameras have in-body-image-stabilization (IBIS), but most of the GFX models do (only the original two don’t). There are a couple of situations where IBIS is especially helpful, plus a few where it can be nice to have. One is video. IBIS is not a requirement for video, but it is particularly convenient when handholding without a gimbal. Another is telephoto lenses. The longer the lens, the more useful IBIS is. Low-light situations without a tripod is an example of when it can be nice to have. For many circumstances, IBIS is not particularly necessary, especially for wide-angle lenses. Some who say that they need IBIS might discover that their photography wouldn’t suffer if it was turned off—they’re not giving themselves enough credit for how well they can hold still.

Fujifilm GFX100S II at 1/20 & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/16 – Kodak Tri-X 400

The rule of thumb is that, without IBIS, whatever the focal length of the lens is (or in the case of Fujifilm cameras, the full-frame-equivalent focal length), the minimum shutter speed should be a similar number. For example, if the X-series lens is 16mm, which is 24mm full-frame-equivalent, the slowest hand-held shutter speed is around 1/25. If the lens is 90mm, which has a full-frame-equivalent focal length of 135mm, the slowest hand-held shutter speed is around 1/125. With good techniques, you can often get a sharp picture with even slower shutter speeds. For the GFX100RF, with its 35mm lens (28mm full-frame-equivalent), the slowest hand-held shutter speed will be about 1/30.

There’s a myth floating around that IBIS is more necessary with 100mp sensors than with lower-resolution sensors. That’s simply not true. More resolution does not equal a bigger need for IBIS in order to get sharp photographs. A 100mp sensor has no more or less of a need for IBIS than a 12mp sensor. A sharp photo is a sharp photo no matter the resolution, and a blurry image is blurry no matter the resolution. The myth is false, and not based on reality.

Fujifilm GFX100S II at 1/25 & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/9 – Superia Negative
Massive crop from the above photo

I put all of this to the test yesterday. Obviously, I don’t have access to a GFX100RF. I’m sure some people have it in their hands right now, but I don’t. I do own a GFX100S II and a Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 lens (which doesn’t have OIS). So I turned IBIS off. I kept the aperture at f/4 or smaller. I did my best to simulate the upcoming camera, although the GFX100S II is much larger and heavier, and with PASM. The 30mm lens is 24mm full-frame-equivalent (16mm on X-series), so a little wider than what the GFX100RF will have.

The f/4 maximum aperture wasn’t a major issue. Wide-angle photography is not known for shallow depths-of-field. While it is possible to achieve a shallow depth-of-field, I don’t anticipate this being a major selling point of the camera. I imagine that “f/8 and be there” will be a much more typical shooting philosophy. In low-light situations, I did have to increase the ISO higher than I would have had to if I had used my X-series gear, but thankfully the camera does well with high-ISO.

I tested handholding the camera at slow shutter speeds. Unsurprisingly, I consistently achieved sharp photographs at 1/25, with probably a 90% success rate. At 1/20, the success rate was closer to 60%. At 1/15, the success rate was probably 30%. I was able to get one sharp photo at 1/13. Because the lens on the GFX100RF will be a little less wide-angle, the shutter speed should be increased slightly. I suspect that it will be roughly a 90% rate at 1/30, 60% at 1/25, 30% at 1/20, and maybe 10% at 1/15. Obviously, results will vary from person-to-person, depending on your technique and ability to hold still.

Fujifilm GFX100S II at 1/13 & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/4 – Superia Negative
Massive crop from the above photo

While IBIS would have been a nice feature, I don’t think its exclusion is a major issue. I’m sure it was a compromise in order to keep the size, weight, and price down. This camera—like every other camera that’s ever been made—is not for everyone. It has advantages and disadvantages. It will be especially great for some situations and use-cases, and not so much for others. Personally, I plan to buy it; however, probably not on the announcement day. Like the GFX100S II, I’ll have to save up and probably sell some gear in order to afford it. I think it’s going to be a lot of fun, so I’m excited to try it someday when the opportunity comes.

See also:
10 Frames in New Mexico — Fujifilm GFX100S II XPan Photographs
Fujifilm Grain Comparison: GFX100S II vs. X-T5
Film Simulation Recipes for Fujifilm GFX Cameras

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100S II:
Amazon, B&H, Wex
Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5:
Amazon, B&H, Wex

Film Simulation Recipes for Fujifilm GFX Cameras

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

One of the first things that I hoped to accomplish after buying a Fujifilm GFX100S II camera last month is to understand how compatible X-series Film Simulation Recipes are with GFX, and what adjustments should be made, if any. I had anticipated this being a fairly easy task, and in a sense it was, but I really struggled with this project.

Fujifilm has made a number of GFX models since February of 2017: GFX50S, GFX50R, GFX100, GFX100S, GFX50S II, GFX100 II, and GFX100S II. There are a few different sensors and processors, and the cameras can be separated into different generations. The GFX50S, GFX50R and GFX50S II share the same sensor, but the GFX50S II falls into a different generation than the original two. The GFX100 and GFX100S share the same sensor, but are different generations. The GFX100 II and GFX100S II share the same sensor, but not the same sensor as the first two 100mp GFX models. It’s a bit of a puzzle. The only GFX camera that I own is the GFX100S II, and I briefly had the opportunity to borrow a GFX50S four years ago. My GFX experience is very limited at this point.

One issue that I found when comparing Recipes captured on X-Trans vs GFX is that the lenses are not the same. Different lenses can produce slightly different results depending on the micro-contrast and coatings. While not a big deal, it would have been preferable to have used the same lens across all the tests; however, even if I could, the focal length wouldn’t be the same. For example, when I adapt my vintage Helios 44-2 lens, the focal length on X-Trans is 87mm while it is 46mm on GFX; aside from that, the Helios is noticeably softer on the GFX. So the comparisons I made were never fully 1:1, unfortunately.

Fujifilm GFX100S II & Helios 44-2 – Fujicolor PRO 160C Warm

I did make a number of comparisons between the photos captured with the GFX100S II and those made on an X-T5 and X-E4, utilizing the same Recipes. The main difference between X-Trans IV and X-Trans V rendering is that blue is a little deeper on X-Trans V with the Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, Eterna, and Eterna Bleach Bypass film simulations—there are some other minor differences, but the blue rendering is the main one. On the GFX100S II, blue behaves more like X-Trans V. The overall rendering is very similar to X-Trans V, but not 100% identical. For example, Grain is scaled differently on GFX. There are several insignificant differences that I noticed upon close side-by-side comparisons, but without carefully studying deep crops, the GFX images look pretty identical to the X-Trans V photos. Except they also don’t.

This is the paradox I discovered: the pictures look so similar when comparing colors, tints, shadows, etc., etc., but there is something that’s clearly different. But what? I couldn’t put my finger on it.

I asked a few people I know who have a GFX camera, and one suggested color fidelity, that the same exact colors just seem more alive (or maybe more lifelike) on GFX. My wife, Amanda, suggested that it’s depth, that it feels like you can step into the GFX photos, while the X-series photos seem a little flat in comparison. This could simply be the depth-of-field or the micro-contrast of the GFX lenses (or both). As I thought about it, I was reminded of the Sigma DP2 Merrill camera I used to own that similarly had a (so-called) “3D pop” to the pictures. High-ISO digital noise looks different on GFX, with splotchy colors that are typical from a Bayer sensor (and not the more film-grain-like noise from X-Trans); however, it’s not particularly obvious, buried in all that resolution. It’s probably a combination of all of those things and more that make the nearly identical colors and contrast appear different in a way that is difficult to describe, but it’s all so subtle that it’s easy to miss and dismiss, so perhaps it doesn’t matter.

Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Kodachrome 64

With that information, I made a decision regarding Film Simulation Recipes in the Fuji X Weekly App. I added the GFX100 II and GFX100S II as compatible cameras to all X-Trans V Recipes, as well as X-Trans IV Recipes (excluding those for the X-T3/X-T30) that don’t use Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, Eterna or Eterna Bleach Bypass (the same Recipes as the X-T5, for example). Use those Recipes on the GFX100 II and GFX100S II, as they look great. I updated the App yesterday to show those Recipes as compatible with those two cameras. For the other (non-X-T3/X-T30) X-Trans IV Recipes, dropping Color Chrome FX Blue down one spot (Weak instead of Strong, Off instead of Weak) also makes them compatible.

After that, I thought about the other GFX models. Shouldn’t they be in the App, too? Why should they be left out? I don’t own any of those other GFX models, so I dug through the manuals—plus did several Google searches—to try to piece together how they should be categorized in the Fuji X Weekly App. That took a few verified and unverified assumptions. Also, I realized an assumption I made several years back was incorrect.

I categorized GFX100S the same as the newer X-Trans IV cameras; Recipes that are compatible with (for example) the X-T4 are also compatible with the GFX100S. I categorized the GFX100 the same as the X-T3 and X-T30.

Fujifilm GFX100S II + 80mm f/1.7 – 1970’s Summer

The 50mp GFX cameras are a bit of a problem because shadows are rendered slightly lighter, and a .5 Shadow increase is necessary for those models (the GFX50S and GFX50R don’t have .5 Highlight and Shadow adjustments). A few years ago when I had the GFX50S for a few weeks, I created three Recipes for 50mp GFX. I made an assumption that those Recipes would also be compatible with the GFX100, but I believe that camera has deeper shadow rendering like the other 100mp cameras, so that assumption was incorrect; however, I left it alone in the App. If not for the shadow rendering, X-T3/X-T30 Recipes would be compatible with the GFX50S and GFX50R—you can still use those Recipes, just know that it will look slightly different (try them anyway, you might like the results). The one camera that was left out of the App is the GFX50S II. You can use X-Trans IV Recipes the same as the GFX100S; however, a .5 Shadow adjustment should be made. If a Recipe calls for -1 Shadow, use -0.5 instead, and if a Recipe calls for +2 Shadow, use +2.5 instead.

This isn’t a perfect categorization of the GFX models, but I think it’s good. If I made a mistake in this, please let me know—like I said, my GFX experience is quite limited. For those with GFX cameras, I hope this provides a little clarity as to which Recipes to use. I’m sure that having these cameras in the App will be helpful to some photographers with GFX models, so if you have a GFX camera, open up the Fuji X Weekly App and take a look.

Fujifilm GFX100S II + 80mm f/1.7 – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired

Find Film Simulation Recipes for your Fujifilm cameras in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

See also: 10 Frames in New Mexico — Fujifilm GFX100S II XPan Photographs

Possible Fujifilm Film Camera Coming??

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

In a recent interview, Theo Georghiades, general manager of Fujifilm Imaging Solutions UK, told Amateur Photographer that there is a possibility of a Fujifilm film camera coming in the future. Some have called this a “bombshell revelation”, but is it really?

Theo was asked, “Would Fujifilm ever consider launching a film camera again, especially if it had the retro look of an X100VI?”

He responded, “I’ve been with Fujifilm for 25 years, so have learned to never say never—but I don’t know. There is without doubt a massive resurgence in film as we see from film sales. Go down to the markets around Westminster in London and you can see the popularity of film cameras again. And it’s the same in Japan, as I found on a recent trip. As I say, I’ve learned to never, ever say never! However, any business needs to analyze the prospects for a long-term opportunity over a short-term fad.”

I’m not sure how some have interpreted this to mean Fujifilm is in development of a film camera (outside of Instax), but some have insinuated that. Others are taking a more pragmatic interpretation, that Fujifilm simply hasn’t shut the door on a film camera, which is probably the more accurate analysis.

Photography in the ’80’s – Fujifilm X-T30 – Kodacolor Recipe

My guess is that Theo was speaking off-the-cuff, and didn’t mean to make any official statements on this topic. In other words, a large grain of salt should be taken. Perhaps there has been water-cooler talk of the possibility, perhaps not even that. I think he is simply saying that Fujifilm does unexpected things sometimes, so you just never know what they might do in the future, but there are no current plans at this time.

If I were Fujifilm, this is what I would do: rerelease the Fujica Compact Deluxe. They already have the designs. Maybe modernize the light meter, but mostly it should stay the same. I’m sure it would sell well enough to justify manufacturing it. But time is of the essence, so if they want to do this, they should be quick about it. If they hesitate, the market for 35mm film cameras might decrease by the time it hits the shelves. You’ve got to ride the waves while they’re high and before they crash.

Fujifilm currently makes “digital film” cameras, which isn’t the same thing, but in some ways it’s better. In my opinion, the X-series bridges the gap between the positive aspects of both film and digital photography. It’s still apples-to-oranges, and I’m not suggesting otherwise, but there is enough crossover that it’s worth pointing out, and even celebrating. I have no idea whether or not Fujifilm will release a 35mm film camera, but I’m extremely happy with my X-series gear. Still, it would be really cool if they did make a brand-new film camera, so I hope they do.

My new Fujifilm camera is…

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

My latest camera purchased arrived in the mail a few days ago: a Fujifilm GFX100S II. Along with the camera I also got a couple of lenses to go with it: Fujinon GF 80mm f/1.7 and GF 30mm f/3.5. This was, by far, the most money that I’ve ever spent on gear, and it was with some apprehensiveness that I clicked the Proceed with Purchase button. Let me explain why I bought it.

My first GFX experience was with the GFX 50S, which I was able to borrow for a couple of weeks in early 2021. It was a dream-come-true to try, but I was not convinced that it was something I wanted to own. Not only was it pretty far outside of my budget, but it was big, heavy, and slow, and didn’t provide any major advantages to my photography over the X-series. If I was given one I wouldn’t say no, but I wasn’t about to shell out many thousands of dollars for it.

The next GFX experience came earlier this year when Fujifilm invited me to a retreat in the Catskill Mountains of New York. Some photographers, including myself, were loaned preproduction Fujifilm X-T50‘s to try out, and some were loaned preproduction GFX100S II’s. While I didn’t get a chance to use one myself, I did get to see the amazing images that other photographers created with it, including Bryan Minear. I’ll never forget when Bryan and I got completely drenched on an early-morning photo outing in the rain.

A few days later Fujifilm had a rooftop launch party for the GFX100S II and X-T50 in New York City (above Foto Care), and myself and Bryan were enlisted to help. We were placed together at a touch-and-try station for the GF 500mm f/5.6 lens. I didn’t know much about the gear, so I wasn’t particularly helpful. I did get to touch-and-try very briefly, though, but not enough to form any sort of opinions of the gear. I met a number of interesting and talented people, and had an amazing time, so I’m extremely grateful and honored for the opportunity.

Most recently, when Bryan and I cohosted a photowalk in Ann Arbor last month, he let me try out his GFX100S II camera with the Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 lens attached. It was a beast, but also produced amazing images. It was that experience that pushed me over the edge to want one. Prior to this, I would have said that there’s no way I’m buying one, I can’t afford it. Instead, I began looking at what it would take to buy one. I had already began saving for the next camera purchase, so I was already partway along the path, but, you know, GFX is quite expensive.

It might seem like I just suddenly wanted one, like I was smitten with G.A.S., which is partially true. Actually, I’ve been thinking about it for some time now. Specifically, I have had an interest in creating 65:24 XPan panoramas, and the GFX cameras are especially excellent for that. I also want to explore square photographs, and GFX is quite good for that, too. My hope is to make large prints of these images, if I should capture any worthy of being printed.

Above: Me, as photographed by Bryan Minear using a Fujifilm GFX100S II & Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 with the XPan aspect ratio, in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

There’s also the benefit of figuring out which Film Simulation Recipes work best with the camera, and what modifications, if any, need to be considered. I haven’t made much headway with that just yet, but hopefully over the coming weeks I can publish some findings. I’ve had a number of requests for GFX Recipes, but, without any GFX gear, that’s tough to do. I should be able to make some big strides regarding this now that I have a GFX100S II in my hands.

I’m not a big fan of the heft, or the non-tactile controls, but the images are incredible! However, for everyday use, there’s no way that you can tell it’s GFX, and not X-series. In fact, I published a few pictures on Fuji X Weekly that were captured with the GFX100S II, and nobody noticed. You have to crop deeply and/or print very large to really appreciate it, I think. Those who truly “need” GFX are a small group, and I’m not one of them …yet, anyway. I’m making plans where I hope the GFX100S II proves to be a necessity for what I’m creating, so we’ll see if it does.

Above: Vultures circling a desert ridge; photo by Ritchie Roesch with a Fujifilm GFX100S II & Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 with the XPan aspect ratio and Kodachrome 64 Film Simulation Recipe.

I had to sell a couple of items to afford the camera (and to make room on the shelf for it). Even then, it was a stretch to pay for it. I had some trepidation when I ordered it, but I think it might eventually be worthwhile. Now I’ve just got to get it to the places I want to take it to—mostly, National Parks—in order to create the images that I imagine capturing with it.

I’ll try not to bombard you with GFX articles. I plan to keep this website primarily focused on X-series gear, and only sprinkled with with GFX content. But I can’t guarantee that. I might end up absolutely loving the camera, and speaking more about it than I initially intend. Or maybe it will mostly collect dust, as I choose smaller, lighter, more fun gear. Time will tell. But, for this first post, I will share with you some of my first pictures captured with the new camera.

Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Reggie’s Portra
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Reggie’s Portra
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Nostalgic Film
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Nostalgic Film
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Reggie’s Portra
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Reggie’s Portra
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Reggie’s Portra
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Reggie’s Portra
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Pacific Blues
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Nostalgic Film
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Reggie’s Portra
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + 1970’s Summer
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Kodachrome 64
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Kodak Gold 200
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Kodak Tri-X 400
Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Kodak Tri-X 400

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100S II:
Amazon, B&H, Wex
Fujinon GF 80mm f/1.7:
Amazon, B&H, Wex

Fujifilm: Please Read — A Firmware Update Idea — Fixing C1-C7 on Newer Cameras

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

I’ve received a bunch of feedback from Fujifilm photographers over the last few years about one specific thing, and I have never had a good answer to it. But just today I received a note from Fred Miranda with an excellent idea on how Fujifim could possibly fix the issue without too much trouble.

On some X-Trans IV and all X-Trans V cameras, the Custom Settings presets (often called C1-C7) save a lot more than IQ parameters. Focus settings, self timer settings, and even sound settings (and a whole lot more) must be programmed into the Custom Settings. The problem is that if you adjust some parameter because of the situation you are photographing in, the camera will forget this setting and restore whatever is saved into C1-C7 whenever the camera is powered off or goes to sleep.

One example is the focus mode on my Fujifilm X-E4. Since Fujifilm did not include an M/C/S switch, you have to set this within C1-C7. Since I mostly use autofocus lenses, this isn’t typically a problem, but whenever I use a manual focus lens, I need to set it to “M”. Whenever I power the camera Off and then On or change to a different C1-C7 Custom Settings preset, I have to set it back to “M” again. Otherwise, I must reprogram my Custom Settings to be “M” instead of “S” or “C”, and remember to change it back the next time I use an autofocus lens.

Another example is in situations with bright highlights (such as shooting into the sun), I prefer to use DR400 with the Reggie’s Portra Recipe, instead of DR-Auto, which will only choose DR100 or DR200. If I make this change and the camera goes to sleep, when I wake it up, it will be back at DR-Auto, unless I reprogrammed the Custom Settings preset with DR400 (which I’ll have to remember to change back).

There are probably a thousand different examples that I could give, and the specific ones that might annoy you the most might be different than what annoys me, but the larger point is that this is an annoyance for a lot of people. Some learn to “deal with it” (it is what it is) or sometimes they sell their X-Trans V model and return to their older camera. I think it is something that Fujifilm should address, and it might even be an easy fix.

The Custom Settings presets used to not behave this way—in fact, it doesn’t on my X-T30, X-T4 and X100V. C1-C7 used to be just for the IQ settings, which are the Film Simulation Recipe parameters. All the other settings—focus, sound, etc., etc.—were set within the menu. I think this worked well, except that “Base” was confusing (until you realize that it simply means the settings you are currently using). There are advantages and disadvantages to both concepts, so I don’t think simply going back to the old way is the answer. But the new process has some problems, for sure.

Fujifilm’s solution is Auto Update Custom Settings. If you Enable it, when you make a change, the camera will remember that change, and automatically adjust your C1-C7. However, one issue is that if you Enable Auto Update Custom Settings, your C1-C7 will most likely drift out of whack over time, and eventually not resemble what you programmed. This probably works for some, but it isn’t a good option for everyone. I always select Disable.

The proposed solution that Fred Miranda shared with me is a simple firmware update. In the Edit/Save Custom Settings menu, when you select (for example) C1, there are two empty lines: one above Edit/Check, and one below Edit Custom Name. Perhaps at the bottom Fujifilm could add Save IQ Settings Only, with the option to Enable or Disable. It could be default disabled (and, out of the box, the cameras would work the same as they do today), and enabled only if the user wants it to be enabled (what I would choose).

If you Enable Save IQ Settings Only, then all of the other options—AF/MF, Shooting Settings, Wrench, etc.—are greyed out when you program your C1-C7, as you won’t be able to set those within C1-C7. Whatever you have programmed into the Menu when no C1-C7 is selected (a.k.a. “None Selected” or, in the Q-Menu, “A/S/M/P”), is what those settings will be. Basically, it would make your C1-C7 function like it used to, and only be IQ (Recipe) settings.

What’s cool about this is that not only would it give you the choice, but it would give you the choice for each Custom Preset. You could Enable some, and Disable others. It gives you a lot more flexibility with how C1-C7 operates (make it work best for you). This seems like a fairly simple firmware update to create, so it shouldn’t require a lot of resources to implement. An easy fix, as they say, that should make everyone happy.

Now I don’t know if it would work with the PASM models, like the X-H2s, X-H2, X-S20, X-S10, or X-M5. The concept might need to be modified or completely nixed for those cameras, I’m not sure (I don’t own any, personally). But for the X-E4, X-T30 II, X-T5, X100VI, and X-T50, it should work like a charm. The X-T5, X-T50, and X100VI might be a good starting point. And it should definitely be implemented in future cameras—there’s plenty of time to bring this to whatever is in the pipeline.

I want to thank Fred for sharing this idea with me. I hope that Fujifilm reads this, and, if they do, takes it into consideration. This would improve the experience for many on the newer models, and I think it will prove itself worthwhile in the long run.

No, Fujifilm is NOT purposefully causing camera shortages — why this is absurd

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Captured with a Fujifilm X-T50 using the Fujicolor PRO 160C Warm Recipe

Back in May, Teiichi Goto, Fujifilm President and CEO, in response to a question about their inventory situation and plan, stated, “The most important point is how much brand strength to create and how to maintain it. Therefore, it would be quite unfortunate to manufacture too much and lower the price. What Fujifilm has been trying to do for a long time is finally coming true now. We intend to drive the entire imaging business, including Instax, while concentrating on building brand strength and not reducing the value of the properties purchased by our customers.” When asked if the current inventory situation is normal, Mr. Goto replied, “Yes.”

A lot of people interpreted that to mean that Fujifilm is purposefully causing market shortages. But they’re wrong, and I’m growing a bit tired of seeing this myth perpetuated over and over. I addressed it once, back in July, making a strong case that Fujifilm is not purposefully creating market shortages, but is simply getting better at “Lean” production. Unfortunately, based on what I keep seeing online, I think it needs to be said again, so here we go.

First, you have to understand that Mr. Goto spoke those words in Japanese, and they were later translated into English. Translating isn’t as easy as Google makes it seem. These two languages are very different. Fujifilm, for a number of years, translated “Daylight” White Balance as “Fine” in English. It’s as much an art as it is a science, and it is quite easy to get wrong, even subtly—small misinterpretations can cause big misunderstandings. This article that I’m typing right now might not fully translate well into Japanese, and could perhaps be misunderstood in that language. With that perspective, I think it’s important to read Mr. Goto’s words with a bit of grace and with a grain of salt.

Captured with a Fujifilm X-T50 using the Superia Negative Recipe

In order for someone to come to the conclusion that Mr. Goto’s intended communication was “purposefully create market shortages” one must have zero grace for translation errors, plus make a mental pretzel, because nowhere is that sentiment overtly stated, only vaguely implied. If you squint your eyes just right, it’s right there in-between the lines. Yet people go around stating it as fact. It’s not fact, it’s simply a misunderstanding.

Which brings me to the second point. You cannot understand what Fujifilm said without a basic understanding of the Lean Business Philosophy. If you don’t have that understanding, your local library or book store has an excellent selection on this topic, I’m sure. Just as a teaser, you can read this Harvard Business Review article, which gives a very brief synopsis of what the Lean strategy is. Like a lot of Japanese companies, Fujifilm operates under this philosophy, so understanding it will provide you with the context in which to best understand Mr. Goto’s words.

I have read a book or two on the topic. My interpretation of Teiichi Goto’s statement is this:
– “Brand strength” = not overproducing, which devalues the products.
– “Maintaining brand strength” = better forecasting future market trends, so as to not overproduce.
– Overproducing is bad for both Fujifilm and Fujifilm’s customers.
– Fujifilm has always strived to not overproduce products, but not very successfully; however, they’re getting better at it.
– Getting better at not overproducing is a driving force for Fujifilm.

Captured with a Fujifilm X100VI using the Texas Sun Recipe

Now you might think, what’s so bad about overproducing? In the Lean Business Philosophy, overproducing—and overbuying, which is related—is a sin. It’s bad. It’s better to buy one too few parts than one too many. It’s better to produce one too few products than one too many. Overproducing and overbuying means you now have warehousing issues, which cause all sorts of headaches across multiple departments. In order to deal with that, the company will often sell the products at a nice discount in order to get it out of the warehouse. This is bad for the company, because they are likely taking a loss, and it’s bad for the consumer because it reduces the resell value of the product they spent a bunch of money on. Those looking for a bargain might desire overproduction, but the discounts come at a price.

In a perfect world, every company would manufacture just the right amount of every product, so that the demand would be perfectly met, and there would never be any over or under production. But, we don’t live in a perfect world. Demand is difficult to predict, and it is being predicted months and months in advance. It takes quite some time to secure all of the parts from various suppliers, assemble those parts into cameras, and get them onto store shelves. The camera that just came in stock at your local camera store likely began six months ago or more, as Fujifilm approached the various vendors to get the necessary parts to build it, and schedule the manufacturing to get it assembled. They predicted back in the summer that you would be buying the camera in December, and built it based on that prediction. If it was possible to make the exact number of a copies of all of their products to perfectly meet the demand, I’m 100% convinced that Fujifilm would do it. But, like The Price is Right, they don’t want to do that at the expense of going over (especially way over), which is the same as losing.

Fujifilm has guessed wrong many times in the past. Some cameras that were overproduced are the X-E3, X-H1, and X-T4. Those aren’t the only ones, but those are some recent examples. Fujifilm had to sell them at a discount, which reduced their resell value for those who purchased them new. It’s a lose-lose. So they’re working hard to not repeat that. It might mean the camera you want hasn’t been sitting on the shelf at your local camera store collecting dust as it is waiting to be sold, but that’s not a bad thing when you think about it.

Captured with a Fujifilm X-T4 ES using the Aerochrome v2 Recipe

But what about the never-available Fujifilm X100VI? That’s an extreme case. It’s not everyday that a camera goes viral, and no camera has ever gone as viral as the X100VI. It holds the record as the most preordered camera in the history of cameras, and the most in-demand camera of 2024, and probably ever. Nobody could have anticipated that, but people think they should have, and, despite manufacturing the X100VI at four-times the rate of the X100V, people accuse Fujifilm of purposefully producing too few in order to artificially inflate demand.

Let’s say that Fujifilm decided to increase production of the X100VI to 60,000 units per month (basically, doubling current numbers). It would take them months to acquire all the parts and get assembly scheduled, meaning that Fujifilm would be predicting that the global demand for the X100VI would be at least 60,000 units per month next summer. But let’s say the market flips between now and then, and demand for the X100VI plummets to only 10,000 units per month (which, incidentally, is closer to what the demand was for the X100V). Because Fujifilm has set into motion six months of 60,000 units, they will have over-manufactured 250,000 copies before the end of next year, a shocking number! Fujifilm has the tough position of trying to keep up with shifting demands while being careful not to overproduce, and predicting all of it months in advance.

Let’s cut Fujifilm a little slack, and have a bit of grace, as they navigate changing market conditions. I don’t envy them, as I’m sure it’s not easy. If Fujifilm is getting better at the Lean strategy, I think that’s good, and not something they should be criticized for. I’m all for maintaining brand strength, because it’s good for all of us.

Your Gift Guide for Affordable Fujifilm Gear

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

It’s the holiday season, and Christmas is right around the corner. Maybe you want to give a gift to your photographer friend or family member something that they will absolutely love. Perhaps your spouse, child, grandchild, or niece/nephew is interested in following in your footsteps, and are hoping to find their first “real” camera under the tree. If you are shopping for a fellow photographer or budding photographer, I’ve got some gift ideas for you!

For my 40th birthday, my wife got me a Fujifilm X100V, which was such an incredible gift! For her 40th birthday, I gave her a Fujifilm X-T4. While those were certainly wonderful presents, they were very unusual for us, as we don’t typically spend anywhere near that much for birthdays and Christmas, and probably a lot of you reading this don’t either. There are tons of great more affordable options and it’s easy to get overwhelmed, so for this article I’m going to narrow the premise, which hopefully will provide some of you with a little better clarity.

First off, I’m assuming that you don’t have a small fortune to spend, and so you don’t mind buying used gear, which is more affordable, and perhaps a bit more practical as a gift. MPB, the sponsor of this article (where all my suggested gift ideas can be purchased from), is the largest global platform where you can buy, sell, or trade used photo and video gear—each piece checked by hand before being MPB Approved. If you’re thinking about upgrading or gifting gear this holiday season, embracing used is a great way to keep costs down without compromising on quality. Secondly, this website is Fujifilm-centric, so all of my suggestions will be related to that brand of gear.

Let’s jump right in!

Fujifilm X-T1 — Best learning camera

For someone who wants their first “real” camera to learn photography on, the Fujifilm X-T1 is my top recommendation. First, it has manual tactile controls to learn the principles of photography with (such as the exposure triangle). Second, while it is “old” for digital technology (released in 2014, a full decade ago), it is still very capable. This was Fujifilm’s flagship model when it was introduced, and 10 years later it holds up pretty well. Interestingly, in 2021, Antonio Faccilongo won the World Press Photo Story of the Year with a photograph captured with this model. Third, the X-T1 is quite affordable, and can be purchased for less than $500. You will need a lens to go with it, and my top recommendation is the Fujinon 35mm f/2, which can be had for less than $300 used. Depending on the exact copies you pick, you can get a camera and lens combo for under $800, and even under $700 if you don’t mind a few scuffs.

Fujifilm X-S10 — Affordable hybrid for videography

While many cameras are great for photography, some don’t excel at both stills and video. My top recommendation for an affordable hybrid—a camera that’s good for both stills and video—is the Fujifilm X-S10, which has in-body-image-stabilization (IBIS), an important feature for videography. If you are buying for someone who has shown an interest in creating TikTok or YouTube videos, you’ll want to strongly consider the X-S10. It can be had for under $900, which makes it the most expensive camera in this list; however, I think it pairs well with the Fujinon 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6, which is one of the more affordable lenses at about $150.

Fujifilm X-A2 – Most affordable camera

I get asked somewhat frequently what is the cheapest way to get into Fujifilm, usually from those wanting to buy a camera for their child or grandchild. Is it possible to do so under $500? Well, it is possible, but just barely. The Fujifilm X-A2 can be had for under $350, and the Fujinon 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 is about $150, which brings you in right around $500. The X-A line was Fujifilm’s most budget-friendly series. The X-A2 was released in 2015 and is approaching 10 years old; however, it is still surprisingly capable, with similar technical stats as the Fujifilm X-T1.

Fujifilm X30 — Fun for the one who has everything

For the photographer who has it all, the Fujifilm X30 is a fun little camera! There’s a pretty good chance that the photographer you are shopping for doesn’t have this model. It’s older, and doesn’t have particularly impressive stats, but what it lacks technically it more than makes up for in pure joy. Nobody is going to make a career out of this camera, but for fun snapshots that have a ton of character, the X30 is one to take a close look at. It’s not necessarily cheap at around $700, but at least you don’t have to buy a lens for it, since it is a fixed-lens camera.

Fujinon WCL-X100 II & TCL-X100 II — Conversion lenses for X100-series cameras

If the photographer you are buying for already owns a Fujifilm X100-series camera, like the X100VI, X100V, and X100F, a great addition are the two conversion lenses: WCL-X100 II and TCL-X100 II. These two lenses add versatility to any X100-series camera, and are especially great for travel photography. They’re not terribly expensive, either: the WCL-X100 II is about $200, while the TCL-X100 II is about $230. Choose one, or choose both. If it’s just one, I would give first consideration to the WCL-X100 II.

If you are searching for a holiday gift for the photographer or budding photographer in your life, I hope that this list provided you with some clarity. I always enjoy receiving camera-related clothes and coffee mugs and things like that as gifts, but if you really want to give a camera or lens, those do cost a lot of money, and I think that this list has some excellent suggestions; however, feel free to browse MPB’s current inventory, as you just never know what you might find.

See also:
Fujifilm X-Pro2 — The camera that got away (again)
Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm F/2 = Interchangeable-Lens Fujifilm X100VI??
Leica Q2 from the perspective of a Fujifilm photographer
Fujifilm X30 — Fujifilm’s Forgotten Retro Compact Zoom
Close Up with the Fujinon XF 30mm F/2.8 R LM WR Macro
Traveling Light with the Fujifilm X100VI + WCL-X100 II & TCL-X100 II Conversion Lenses

Philadelphia in Aerochrome — Infrared Photography in the City of Brotherly Love

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

A Fall Day in Philly – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2

I had a great time in Philadelphia this last weekend with Allan Ali at Unique Photo as a part of their two day Camera Show. Allan and I led a photowalk through the Old City. There were about 70 in attendance, which was amazing—it just edged out Denver as the largest photowalk that I’ve hosted. It was such an honor to have been a part of the Camera Show. I don’t know if there are very many other stores that are doing what Unique Photo is doing. The photographers in Philadelphia are incredibly fortunate.

I brought my Fujifilm X-T4 ES (“Extended Spectrum”) infrared camera with me to Philadelphia. This camera is a ton of fun, and it’s also a great conversation piece. It’s a “wow” camera, and people are really intrigued by it. I think if it were more widely known and available, people would buy it in much larger numbers. I had my Aerochrome v2 Recipe programmed into the X-T4 ES, and used it quite a bit on the photowalk.

Corn Exchange – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2

Probably the top genre for infrared photography is landscapes. The false color rendering lends itself well for photos that are bold and a bit abstract, especially when there are lots of trees and other vegetation. I’m sure that there are some doing IR urban and street photography, but probably not many. I enjoy using the X-T4 ES in unexpected ways, as it’s really a different way to see the world around you, and also serendipitous, with a lot of surprising results. I don’t know if I can convey through words just how much enjoyment that I’m getting out of this camera, but I’m really loving it!

The Fujifilm X-T4 ES with my Aerochrome v2 Recipe—due to the false colors—turns spring and summer into autumn, and it turns autumn into a more rich display—it’s like fall on steroids. With this camera and Recipe, it’s not only always autumn, but an especially brilliant autumn. That’s the most obvious use, but that doesn’t mean it can’t produce striking results for other subjects and in other situations, such as indoors and even nighttime photography.

Camera Show – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Things are Looking Up – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Leaves on a Brick Road – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Crosswalker – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Three Recycle Cans – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Standing on Steam – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Photographers in Elfreth’s Alley – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Connecting – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Vertical Composition – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Photowalking – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Photographing a Photographer Photographing a Photographer – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
George’s House – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Rainbow – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Street View – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Vegan – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Fire Tree – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Red Tree in the City – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Urban Cowboys – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2

See also: Photographing in Aerochrome

Three AF Firmware Updates + A GFX Discount

Posted on by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm just released three firmware updates, one for the X-H2s, one for the X-H2, and one for the GFX100 II. Among some video improvements (F-Log2 C, anyone?) and minor bug fixes, the main headline is autofocus improvements. Essentially, Fujifilm fully fixed the AF bug that had been plaguing these cameras for the last handful of months. Fujifilm has said that more firmware updates for other cameras (the X-T5 and X-S20 were specifically mentioned) are coming before the end of the year—my guess is in December.

I’ve never had a problem, personally, with the autofocus on my Fujifilm X-T5 or any other model. Mostly, it seemed to affect people using some specific settings in some specific scenarios. So some photographers were greatly affected, some only sometimes, and others were not at all. Obviously this was a big deal for those greatly affected, so it is excellent news that the fix is now available—yea! For those not affected, I always recommend waiting a little while (at least a few days) before updating the firmware in case there are any issues that come up (this isn’t just for Fujifilm, but any product by any brand).

Two on the Wave – Pismo Beach, CA – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe

Some people provided Fujifilm with valuable constructive feedback that I’m sure helped tremendously with this firmware update; however, in my opinion, there were others—haters, constant complainers, and trolls—who (sadly) only gave destructive criticism that has to some extent hurt the brand and community (which I believe was the goal for some). Their voice, unfortunately, seemed quite loud, and some of that can be attributed to trolls using multiple accounts, pretending to be multiple individuals in comment sections, Facebook groups, and forums. A troll says something outrageous, a normal person gives a reasonable response, and then the troll replies multiple times, pretending to be multiple people; those reading it might assume that the troll is “right” just because so many seem to agree with them (but it is only one person)—once you know what to look for, it’s quite easy to spot. This is toxic, and crazy (literally, not just figuratively). I would encourage website owners and administrators to crack down on this behavior; however, I know it’s hard to do because trolls will usually return under a different name. I would hope that these firmware updates would quell the outrage, but I’m sure it won’t, as it was never really about the AF for many of them—the AF woes were merely a means to reach an end (attention, chaos, trouble, hate, etc.).

Now that autofocus has been fixed via firmware, we can finally get back to appreciating just how truly wonderful our cameras are, because they are. It’s such a great time to be a photographer, we are all pretty lucky.

In other news, Amazon has the Fujifilm GFX100S II discounted to $4,599.99 with a $399.01 coupon that you have to click. I think this is a Black Friday deal.

When I was in Ann Arbor, Michigan, a week-and-a-half ago, Bryan Minear let me try his GFX100S II, and I was blown away by it. Such amazing image quality! I think, with the size and weight, perhaps it requires more thoughtful consideration of when and where to use (I tend to like smaller gear, such as my X100VI and X-E4). Also, I didn’t care much for the PASM controls. And even at $4.6K, it’s still well outside of my budget. With that said, this is an extremely affordable and capable medium-format (“more than full frame”) digital camera. If you’ve been thinking about buying one, it might be a good time to do so.