What a fun surprise to watch the latest Pal2Tech YouTube video! For those that don’t know, Pal2Tech is one of the top Fujifilm-centric YouTubers, and for a very good reason: he’s awesome at explaining complex things in an easy-to-understand way (and often in an entertaining way). His library of videos is a treasure trove of information. I always recommend his channel to those new to Fujifilm. Even if you are seasoned in the X-series system, there’s a lot that you can learn. And beyond that, some of his “other” content is really cool, like the OJ Simpson video. If you’ve never watched his stuff, be sure to visit his channel today.
In his most recent upload, Pal2Tech discusses Film Simulations and Recipes. I’m not going to spoil it, you’ll just have to watch the video, which I’ve included below. For those looking for the Film Simulation Recipe specifically mentioned in the video, click here. Dish yourself a bowl of vanilla ice cream, grab a spoon, and enjoy the video.
There’s a brand-new Fuji X Weekly App update that I’m really excited to share with you. The main headline is a new feature called Categories, which can be interacted with in two different ways. The goal of Categories is to help you find Film Simulation Recipes for the specific situation that you are photographing in. This update is beneficial for both Patrons and non-Patrons.
The first way to interact with Categories is if you choose a Recipe—any Recipe, it doesn’t matter which one—and scroll towards the bottom just above Notes, you’ll find a Category Tag or maybe a handful of them (the amount varies from Recipe-to-Recipe). This tells you that the particular Recipe you selected has been identified as good for those specific situations and/or aesthetics. Now, tap on a Category Tag and it opens Discover Recipes, except instead of showing you all of the photos in the entire App to browse through, it shows only those that share that tag. This can help you to find Recipes based on image aesthetic. Each time you tap on a Category Tag, the order of the photos is reshuffled. For Patron subscribers, Category Tags can be used in conjunction with Filter by Sensor or Filter by Camera.
The second way to interact with Categories is only available to Patron subscribers. If you tap Filter, you’ll see By Category has been added to the list of options. You can choose one or more Categories—as many as you like, but the more you choose the fewer results you’ll get. You can Filter By Cameras (say X100VI), Film Simulation (say Classic Negative), White Balance (say Auto, Auto Ambience Priority and Auto White Priority), and Categories (say Film-Like and Street), and you’ll get a few results that match your request quite well. You can get real specific. If you are looking for (let’s say) a Film-Like Recipe that’s good for Portraits on Cloudy days for your X-Pro3, you can find that.
This is such a fun new way to interact with Film Simulation Recipes, and I anticipate that it will be extremely helpful to those who don’t know which Recipes to try. I’m really excited to introduce Categories to you because of all that, and also because so much work went into it. I didn’t keep careful tabs on the exact number of hours spent on this project, but it was a lot! The task of categorizing the various Recipes (over 400!) was pretty daunting on its own. I’m sure that it’s not perfect, and some might disagree with a certain Recipe’s inclusion or exclusion from a specific Category, but overall I think it turned out quite well. I really hope that some of you will find it to be a useful feature.
***Update: We were able to get the bug identified, fixed, and the app update submitted and approved by Apple in record time. On your iPhone, if the Fuji X Weekly App crashes immediately, make sure that you update to version 1.12.1 (and not 1.12.0) or update the iOS to the latest version (either option will fix it). I’m sorry for any trouble that this may have caused anyone.***
The Fuji X Weekly App is available to download for free from the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly. If your device didn’t update automatically, be sure to update it now.
PetaPixel published an article entitled If You Think ‘Cameras Have Gotten Boring’ You’re Looking at Photography All Wrong, and I’m not so much interested in talking about that article in particular as I am of the idea of why new cameras might seem boring. There are probably a thousand different ways to look at it, and they’re likely all legitimate—I’m not suggesting that my explanation is better, it’s simply my thoughts and opinions. You might agree or disagree, and that’s perfectly ok. So, why do new cameras seem boring to some people?
I read a book last year, entitled David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants by Malcolm Gladwell, that was quite fascinating. I’m not a mathematician by any stretch, and I’m certainly not a statistician. For those who haven’t read the book, Malcolm talks a lot about the inverted-U curve (that is to say, an upside-down U). There’s a common pattern found everywhere (that’s often ignored) where something goes up a little, then up steeply before it begins to flattens out as it nears the peak, followed by a slow decline, then a steep decline. Can you picture the upside-down U?
Above: A short excerpt from Malcolm Gladwell’s David and Goliath from Amazon’s website. Seriously, read the book if you haven’t yet done so.
Let’s take a topic like autofocus, which a lot of people talk about in the Fujifilm world, but much less so outside of that. Photographers who use Sony cameras, for example, don’t discuss AF, except to occasionally remind everyone else just how good it is. In the PetaPixel article, the author states, “Sony managed to… improve processing for better autofocus….” Do Sony photographers care? If their AF is already super-duper awesome amazing, does it matter that it just got a hair better? I’m sure that 99%+ of Sony users wouldn’t be able to distinguish a difference, and only a tiny fraction of a percent of users would note that it makes a real, practical difference to their photography. While the improved processing for better autofocus may have been a substantial technical feat, for most people who use the gear, it’s inclusion or exclusion doesn’t matter in the least.
The reason why it doesn’t matter is that autofocus on Sony cameras (and some other brands) is near the peak of the inverted-U curve. Each improvement has less-and-less-and-less of a practical benefit to the users, who already find it more than good enough for each and every situation. In some circumstances, AF was prioritized to the detriment of image quality. If autofocus is already amazingly incredible beyond what you even need, any improvements will seem boring. They’re more gee-whiz than anything else. It’s like the famous line from The Incredibles, spoken by the villain: “And when everyone’s super, no one will be.”
Captured using a Fujifilm X-M1
With Fujifilm, there is some room for improvement. Fujifilm’s AF isn’t trash like some have hyperbolically said, but it isn’t peak like Sony’s. Fujifilm’s AF is more than good enough for most photographers; however, it is occasionally less than ideal for some situations. If Fujifilm “managed to improve processing for better autofocus” just like Sony did, it would not be perceived as boring because Fujifilm is not at the peak of the inverted-U. The improvements would make a real, practical difference to a larger percentage of the users. But, with each improvement, they inch closer to the peak, and eventually they’ll reach it (a bet some will still complain, though).
I think digital photography technology is near the peak of inverted-U curves in most categories. This means it’s an amazing time to be a photographer. We should have a deep appreciation for just how fortunate we are to have access to the gear we have. At the same time, camera advancements are easy to take for granted. An improvement that a team of experts worked tirelessly on for years might seem ho-hum, because the usefulness of it is minor for a small percentage of people, and is otherwise unnoticeable. That’s just the way it is at the peak.
Camera-made JPEG from Sony A7 IV
New cameras aren’t boring because they’re boring; they’re boring because they’re so good they do everything we need them to and more. They’re so good that our expectations have become incredibly high, making it more difficult to wow us. And, when you’re at the peak of an inverted-U, it’s easy to step a little beyond it. Take a step forward, and you take a step down. For instance, Sony’s new Dual Gain Output technology increases the dynamic range at low ISO when using the mechanical shutter, but can give a lower dynamic range when using the electronic shutter than cameras without this technology—a step forward, but also a small step down.
I’m not picking on Sony, they were just the primary subject of the PetaPixel article. Actually, I’m pointing out that they’ve managed to get to the peak of inverted-U curves almost across the board, which is an amazing feat. It puts them in a tough position where advancements seem boring to their customers. Some areas where they’re not at or near the peak of the curve are JPEG output, color science, and stylish camera body design. If they make improvements in those areas, they’re less likely to be perceived as boring. For Fujifilm, they’re near the peak in those areas, but not in some others. In my opinion, camera manufacturers should self-identify where they are on various inverted-U curves, and put more efforts where they’re not at or near the peak, and less effort where they’ve already achieved greatness.
Viltrox just released two conversion lenses for Fujifilm X100-series cameras: WCL-X100VI and TCL-X100VI. These lenses are very similar to Fujifilm’s own conversion lenses for the X100-series, the WCL-X100 II and TCL-X100 II, and if you don’t look closely, you might not notice the differences, as they seem nearly identical. How does the Viltrox version stack up? Should you even consider these for your Fujifilm X100VI? If so, which should you get, Viltrox or Fujinon?
I need to tell you upfront that Viltrox sent me the two lenses to try out. They didn’t give any expectations other than, “We look forward to your impression of the lenses.” This review serves as that. It’s my honest feedback to Viltrox, while also hopefully being helpful to those considering these lenses for their X100VI or other X100-series camera.
There are two conversion lenses—Viltrox WCL-X100VI and TCL-X100VI—and I want to talk about them individually, but also as a set. We’ll begin with the wide-converter, then the teleconverter, and finish up by discussing the two together. Let’s dive right in!
Viltrox WCL-X100VI
The Viltrox WCL-X100VI is a wide conversion lens that’s nearly identical to the Fujinon WCL-X100 II. It has an 0.8x magnification, which, when screwed onto the end of the X100VI’s lens, changes the focal-length from 35mm to 28mm (full-frame equivalents; 23mm to 19mm in APS-C terms). It makes the camera a little more wide-angle, which can be useful when the native focal-length is just a little too tight for the circumstance.
On X100-series cameras, there is a hidden thread for a filter/hood adapter, which reveals itself when a ring on the end of the lens is unscrewed. Both of the conversion lenses attach to this thread, simply by screwing onto it. The WCL-X100VI is threaded to accept 49mm filters. Oh, and the camera automatically recognizes that you attached the lens, just like the Fujinon WCL-X100 II.
Sun Peek, Bougainvillea Peak – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox WCL – Pacific Blues
From my measurements, the Viltrox version is just a hair smaller than the Fujinon, and weighs just slightly less (very minimally on both accounts). Using the TCL adds some size and weight to the camera, but, for the WCL-X100VI, this isn’t a major deal, because the lens is pretty small. The added bulk and heft is a small price for the extra versatility.
As for both the build and image quality, the lens seems to be on par with the Fujinon option. There’s a little difference in how the lens flares, but otherwise it seems to render images pretty much identically. A lot of times when you buy a third-party version of a lens, it’s less expensive, but it’s pretty obvious why, as it feels cheaper and/or has image quality flaws. With the Viltrox conversion lenses, there does not seem to be any reduction in quality. You’re not giving up anything to save a little money. In the case of the WCL-X100VI, it’s not a little money, but a significant chunk of change! The Viltrox WCL-X100VI has an MSRP of $159; the Fujinon WCL-X100 II is a lot more expensive at $399. For a lot less than half the cost, you basically get the same exact thing.
Viltox TCL-X100VI
The Viltrox TCL-X100VI is a tele conversion lens that’s nearly identical to the Fujinon TCL-X100 II. It has a 1.4x magnification, which, when screwed onto the end of the X100VI’s lens, changes the focal-length from 35mm to 50mm (full-frame equivalents; 23mm to 33mm in APS-C terms). It makes the camera a “standard” focal-length, which can be useful when the native focal-length is just a little too wide for the circumstance.
Like the WCL, the TCL-X100VI attaches to the camera by screwing onto the hidden filter/hood adapter thread. It accepts 67mm filters. Also like the WCL, the camera recognizes when you attach the lens, just like it does for the Fujinon TCL-X100 II.
Sun-Kissed Bougainvillea – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL – Pacific Blues
From my measurements, the Viltrox version is just barely a hair smaller than the Fujinon; however, the weight difference is notable, with the Viltrox coming in at about 25% heavier, or 0.1 pounds more, than the Fujinon. For both brands, the TCL is larger and heavier than the WCL, which makes it a little less practical for carrying around. Even so, I really like 50mm (full-frame equivalent), so I tend to use the TCL more than the WCL, personally.
Just like the WCL-X100VI, for both the build and image quality, the TCL-X100VI seems to be right on par with the Fujinon option. There’s a little difference in how the lens flares, but otherwise it seems to render images pretty much identically. You’re not giving up anything to save a little money. The Viltrox TCL-X100VI has an MSRP of $189; the Fujinon TCL-X100 II is a lot more expensive at $399. For less than half the cost, you basically get the same exact thing.
Both Lenses
Last year, I travelled to Austin, Texas, and the only camera I took was a Fujifilm X100VI with the Fujinon WCL-X100 II and TCL-X100 II conversion lenses. It allowed me to travel light but still have some focal-length versatility. An X100-series camera with the two conversion lenses is a compact and powerful three-lens kit. But, for the Fujinon, those two additional lenses will run you $798, which is a lot of money; however, with Viltrox, you can do it for only $348, which is a bargain. If you own an X100-series camera, you should buy these two lenses. Despite having “X100VI” in the name, the conversion lenses will work on any X100-series model, not just the latest iteration.
When you combine the conversion lenses with the built-in digital teleconverter, you get even more focal-length versatility: 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 70mm, and 100mm (full-frame equivalents). On the X100VI, to get 70mm requires both the TCL and the digital teleconverter, and you go from 40mp to 20mp (which is still plenty of resolution); to get to 100mm, you’ll get a 10mp file, which is fine for social media use, but it’s not ideal for photos you intend to print much larger than 8″x12″. You can also skip the digital teleconverter and simply crop after-the-fact and accomplish the same thing.
A three lens kit for your X100VI, which requires only two additional lenses, is nice to have, but it does kind of defeat the purpose of the camera, which is a compact one-camera-one-lens philosophy. I wish that Fujifilm made a wide-angle and nifty-fifty alternative versions of the X100VI (like Sigma did with the DP camera series), so that you could choose the focal length that fits you best. Since they don’t, if you want to adjust the focal length yourself, it does require adding some extra bulk.
What works for me is to keep the conversion lenses in my pockets, and simply screw one onto the camera whenever I need it. With two front pockets in my jeans or shorts, I can have the WCL in one pocket and the TCL in the other. Viltrox includes a little bag in the box that helps to protect the lens when doing this. I’m able to use the X100VI as a fixed-lens 35mm (full-frame equivalent) camera most of the time, but go wider or more telephoto whenever I need to. When you want to travel light, this is quite ideal.
Fountain at Dusk – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI – Summer of ’59
To save a little weight, choose the Fujinon TCL over the Viltrox TCL. The Fujinon TCL-X100 II is large and already heavy enough; the Viltrox TCL-X100VI adds a noticeable amount of additional weight. Unfortunately, a second-hand Fujinon TCL-X100 II costs more than the Viltrox version brand-new. If you don’t mind spending an extra $50 or so and getting a used model, the most ideal scenario is to purchase the Viltrox WCL-X100VI and the Fujinon TCL-X100 II. Or, just save a few bucks and don’t worry about 0.1 pounds, and get both Viltrox options.
Both lenses come in silver and black. If you have a silver X100-series camera, you’ll probably want the silver lenses; if you have a black X100-series camera, you’ll probably want the black lenses. I definitely do recommend the Viltrox conversion lenses. I was quite surprised at both the build and image quality, especially considering the price. You won’t break the bank, so get one. Or get both.
Orange Rocks – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Farbwelt 200 Expired
This Kodak Farbwelt 200 Expired Film Simulation Recipe comes courtesy of Thomas Schwab, who has created or co-created a number of excellent Film Simulation Recipes. Thomas told me that he loaded a roll of Kodak Farbwelt 200 that expired in 2004 into his Olympus Mju. After finishing the roll, he took it to a local lab, where he had it developed and printed (not scanned). He then developed this Recipe using X RAW Studio, comparing the results to the prints. “Some are very close,” he said, “others are a little off.” Either way, the results are excellent. Personally, I really love the aesthetic. Thank you, Thomas, for creating and sharing this Recipe!
I didn’t know what Kodak Farbwelt 200 was, I had to research it. Unfortunately, there’s not a lot of concrete information. Farbwelt apparently means color world, so a film like ColorPlus might seem like an obvious answer, but from what I could find, it seems that the answer is no, Farbwelt 200 is not ColorPlus 200. It likely is Gold 200, rebranded for the German market, sold mostly (but not exclusively) in Germany. It might be a slightly retooled version of Gold 200 specifically for that region, or it might be straight-up Gold 200, simply rebranded. Kodak released Farbwelt 200 in 2000 and discontinued it in 2012 or 2013. There was also an ISO 100, 400, and even 800 version of Kodak Farbwelt.
The Kodak Farbwelt 200 Expired Recipe looks lovely, with soft warm tones. It’s like a memory of summertime. It reminds me a little of the 1970’s Summer Recipe, which is one of my favorites. It’s compatible with fifth-generation models, which are the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, and X-T30 III. It’s also compatible with the latest GFX cameras: GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF. For fourth-generation cameras, you can use this Recipe, but it will render slightly different (just a little), which you might like, so don’t be afraid to give it a try. One note I want to highlight: a little underexposure will help to keep the highlights in check.
Film Simulation: Classic Chrome Dynamic Range: DR100 Grain Effect: Strong, Large Color Chrome Effect: Weak Color Chrome FX Blue: Strong White Balance: 7500K, +1 Red & -4 Blue Highlight: -2 Shadow: -2 Color: -3 Sharpness: -4 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: -4 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: 0 to -1 1/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this Kodak Farbwelt 200 Expired Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5, X-T5, X100VI, X-S20, and GFX100S II:
Chainlink Gate – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jon Roesch
Golden Gate – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jon Roesch
Evening along the California Coast – Elk, CA – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Rocks over Sedona – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Sedona Panoramic – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Yellow Tree in Oak Creek Canyon – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Flower, Fence – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Dressed Western – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Photo by Amanda Roesch
Saguaro in the Desert – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Rural Irrigation – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Sunlit Fountain – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Stand In – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Photo by Amanda Roesch
Sunset over Canon Photographer – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Meeting Santa – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Suburban Sunset – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Christmas Train – Scottsdale, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 400 more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Two or three weeks ago, Fujirumors reported that Fujifilm is working on a Film Era Dial that will be found on some upcoming camera. I made the false assumption that it must be the upcoming X-Pro, which is most likely the next X-series camera to be released (although it might not be), possibly early next year. I’m glad that I used words like “guess” and “suspect” and clarified that “I have absolutely zero inside information” because apparently my guess and suspicions were completely wrong. The camera that Fujifilm is going to put this new feature on, according to Fujirumors, is not an X-series model, but an Instax Evo camera.
Some of you just sighed with relief. You don’t want a Film Era Dial or even a Film Dial. Personally, I like the Film Dial. It’s not perfect, but Fujifilm has been working to improve it (and hopefully will continue to do so). I think the Film Era Dial could be a really cool concept if it’s done right. They could screw it all up and make it really cheesy, or they could do a great job with it and it becomes a beloved feature (or anything in-between). For now, it’s apparently not coming to the X-series, only to an Instax Evo model. Maybe it will be on the next X half, which is kind of a cross between Instax Evo and the X-series. It could someday find its way to the X-series, but apparently not yet. I’m probably in the minority of people who are a bit disappointed to hear this news.
At this time of year, I typically get asked which Fujifilm cameras are the best to gift to someone. It’s usually like, “I want to give my spouse a new camera, but I don’t know which one.” Or, “This will be my kid’s first real camera.” Or, “He has everything, so I’m really unsure.” The future recipient of the gift is usually a spouse, child, parent, or close friend. Sometimes they’re very experienced photographers, sometimes they’re complete novices. Budgets can also vary wildly.
It’s difficult to give good advice, since every situation is different, but I do make an attempt to give what I hope is helpful suggestions. For example, last year I published Your Gift Guide for Affordable Fujifilm Gear, which was intended to help those looking for secondhand options that are fairly affordable but still excellent. That article is just as valid this year as last, so you might still find it useful.
For 2025, I have one suggestion that I think will apply to almost everyone. No matter if you are buying for your spouse, child, parent, or friend. No matter if they are a seasoned photographer or brand-new. No matter if they have everything already or no camera equipment at all. This is something that I know most would love to receive. And it’s on sale right now.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
The gear that I recommend as a gift is the Fujifilm X half. This is a super fun pocket point-and-shoot that makes unique photos instantly. It’s easy enough that anyone—even a young child—can use it, so no worries if the recipient is a novice; it’s enjoyable enough that even those with high-end expensive gear will choose to use it occasionally. I own this camera, and both my wife and I appreciate it. No matter who you are, this is a camera that people will love to find underneath the Christmas tree.
The Fujifilm X half is perfect for travel snapshots, family events, and documenting everyday moments. It’s small and lightweight, so it’s easy to have with you. It’s simply to use. It delivers film-like results, and can even give a film-like shooting experience. It’s a very unique camera that’s so much fun to use. Last summer the X half was my most-used camera while on a long RV roadtrip up the east coast.
The primary criticism of the camera has been the price, which is a bit high for what it is. I said in my review that the camera should be $650-$700, and not $850. Well, right now and until December 28th, the Fujifilm X half is $200 off in America, which places it at a more affordable and reasonable $650. That’s almost 25% off! So, if you’re seeking out a Fujifilm camera to gift someone, the X half is my top recommendation for 2025.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Oak Creek in Monochrome – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – FRGMT B&W
A couple of weeks ago Fujifilm announced the GFX100RF Fragment Edition, a limited-edition version of the GFX100RF, which will only be available in Japan. The camera was modified by fashion designer, producer, and artist Hiroshi Fujiwara, the founder of Fragment. Interestingly, it comes preloaded with a Film Simulation Recipe by Hiroshi called FRGMT B&W, which is in the Film Simulation menu in lieu of the Monochrome Film Simulation. This is the first official Fujifilm Recipe, and the first (as far as I’m aware) by Hiroshi Fujiwara. Fujifilm published the details of this Recipe within the GFX100RF Fragment Edition announcement, which means that anyone can use it, and not just those in Japan who purchase the limited-edition camera.
When I saw this, I knew that some of you would want to try the FRGMT B&W Recipe, so I shared it. I wasn’t going to make it an “official” Fuji X Weekly Recipe or include it in the Fuji X Weekly App unless I had permission to do so from those involved. I reached out to Fujifilm and asked for permission, but I knew it was a long shot. My request was forwarded up the chain all the way to Japan. I didn’t think the odds were very good, but, perhaps as a Christmas miracle, the answer came back pretty quickly. To my shock, yes, I do have permission, both from Fujifilm and from Fragment, to publish this Recipe. Wow!
Cheers – Scottsdale, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – FRGMT B&W
It’s such an honor to get this permission, not only because it’s the first Recipe included in any of Fujifilm’s cameras, but also because it was created by Hiroshi Fujiwara. For those unaware, that’s a really big deal. Hiroshi has collaborated with Eric Clapton twice. He appeared on the big screen in Lost in Translation. If someone like Pharrell Williams created a Film Simulation Recipe and then gave me permission to include it on this website and in the Fuji X Weekly App, that would be fairly equivalent to this (obviously, there is only one Hiroshi Fujiwara).
The FRGMT B&W Recipe produces a contrasty and grainy black-and-white aesthetic. It reminds me of Ilford Delta 400 pushed one stop. I didn’t study or research that; it’s more of a “memory color” (as Fujifilm puts it) of using Ilford Delta 400 and push-processing it 25 years ago or so. I don’t believe this Recipe was intended to resemble any specific film or process, but if you were to ask me what film this Recipe most closely mimics, it’s Ilford Delta 400 pushed one stop. Again, that’s not based on research, but just what I remember from way back in my film days.
Shadow Shapes – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II – FRGMT B&W
With the exception of the X-T3 and X-T30, this FRGMT B&W Recipe is compatible with all of the fourth and fifth generation models: Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, and X-T30 III. It’s also compatible with the GFX100S, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF. Because this Recipe uses Clarity set to something other than 0, there is a short storing pause after capturing a photo, with a similar delay as advancing to the next frame on a film camera. I want to give a big shoutout to both Fujifilm and Fragment for allowing me to publish this, and also to Hiroshi Fujiwara for creating it. Thank you!
Film Simulation: Acros (including +Ye, +R, or +G) Monochromatic Color (Toning): WC 0 & MG 0 (Off) Dynamic Range: DR-Auto Grain Effect: Strong, Large Color Chrome Effect: Off Color Chrome FX Blue: Off White Balance: Auto, 0 Red & 0 Blue Highlight: +4 Shadow: +2 Sharpness: -4 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: +5 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 12800 Exposure Compensation: 0 to +2/3 (typically) — Hiroshi says +1/3
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this FRGMT B&W Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5, X-T5 and GFX100S II:
Notice – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-E5
Regular – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-E5
Abandoned Gas Pumps – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-E5
Mercedes-Benz – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Broken Shelving – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
West Fork – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Fujifilm Photographer – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Monochrome Leaves – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Flowing Creek – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Lost Creek, Found – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Creek in the Desert – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Rural Water – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Supai – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Rocks in the Sky – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Pirate – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Classic Design – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
The Man in Black & White – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – by Amanda Roesch
Tall Bank, Empty Lot – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
A Girl and Her Horse – Litchfield Park, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4 – Reggie’s Portra
It’s been interesting to watch Reggie’s Portra Recipe grow in popularity over the years. It was created by Reggie Ballesteros (website, YouTube, Instagram), and I published it in the summer of 2022 with his permission. I’m not sure where it ranked in 2022, but it didn’t crack the Top 10. In 2023 it was the 9th most popular. It climbed to #3 in 2024. This year, Reggie’s Portra is the number one most popular Film Simulation Recipe on Fuji X Weekly, just edging out Kodachrome 64, which was the long-time reigning champion.
A few days ago, Reggie posted a video on YouTube explaining what changes, if any, he has made to the Recipe for use in 2025. When it was made, Reggie’s Portra was for X-Trans IV cameras, but now we’re well into the fifth-generation. So what adjustments did he make? I’ve included the video below, so that you can watch it for yourself.
Not trying to give away the answer, but the short of it is that Reggie doesn’t adjust anything. He uses the same exact Reggie’s Portra settings on fifth-generation models as he did on fourth-generation X-series cameras. He doesn’t make any adjustments whatsoever. The only change is the diffusion filter that he often uses.
On the Fuji X Weekly App, I’ve only included Reggie’s Portra as compatible with X-Trans IV models, specifically the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, and X-T30 II (as well as the GFX100S). I didn’t include fifth-generation cameras (X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, and X-T30 III, as well as GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF) because, on those cameras, there are some aesthetic differences—the largest being how deeply the color blue is rendered on certain film simulations, including Classic Chrome. It’s quite similar, but not identical; however, there is a simple fix to get them to be more similar: reduce Color Chrome FX Blue by one.
Jon Dressed Up – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4 – Reggie’s Portra – by Amanda Roesch
The difference between Color Chrome FX Blue Weak and Off is pretty subtle. If you’re not comparing photos side-by-side, you probably won’t even notice (even when directly comparing, you still might not see the difference immediately). It’s honestly not a big deal, but, if you’re trying to get Reggie’s Portra to most closely match the X-Trans IV results on a fifth-generation camera, then adjusting Color Chrome FX Blue from Weak to Off will do that. This is an adjustment that I make personally, and one that I recommend; however, there’s nothing wrong with not making that small change. Feel free to set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak (as called for in the Recipe and as Reggie himself does it) or Off (as I do) on the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, and X-T30 III cameras, as well as the GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF. Either way works.
People have asked me why I haven’t updated Reggie’s Portra in the App for X-Trans V cameras, and the answer is simple: it’s not my Recipe to make a change to. It belongs to Reggie Ballesteros, and I certainly didn’t want to step on his toes by modifying it. Now that he has clarified how he uses it on fifth-generation cameras, I have updated the App to reflect that. It now shows in the Fuji X Weekly App as compatible with the latest cameras. It won’t render exactly the same as on X-Trans IV, but pretty similar—not enough of a difference to be concerned about (only very subtly divergent). I want to close this out by giving a shoutout to Reggie. His Recipe is great—both my wife and I use it ourselves. It’s a real honor to have it available to you on Fuji X Weekly. If you’ve never tried it, well, it’s almost a right of passage at this point, so be sure to program it into your camera today.
Dodge – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm X100VI – Reggie’s Portra
There’s a temptation in the photography world to paint Fujifilm photographers as a single, uniform type—a caricature built from assumptions about retro dials, film simulations, or a supposed obsession with nostalgia. They’ll say that Fujifilm photographers dress a certain way, with a particular look or style. Even though they’re not “real photographers” (they are only pretending for TikTok or Instagram fame), they’re a pretentious bunch, with a subtle smugness—an air of superiority simply from the gear they own. But anyone who has spent even a moment around the Fujifilm community knows how wildly inaccurate that is. Fujifilm photographers aren’t a stereotype—they’re a vibrant, diverse group of caring creatives who share a love of making meaningful images, each in their own unique way. Anyone who perpetuates the obviously false caricature has never spent any amount of time around Fujifilm photographers. Most likely, they’ve never met one in real life.
One beautiful thing about the Fujifilm community is how kind and helpful its members tend to be. Whether you’re new to photography or a seasoned professional, there’s always someone willing to share a tip, explain a setting, or offer thoughtful encouragement. Spend even just a few minutes with these photographers, and you’ll see it: generosity, enthusiasm, and a genuine desire to lift one another up. There’s a shared excitement about creating something special.
Above: Photographs from various Fujifilm photowalks and events across America.
No two Fujifilm photographers look alike—not in personality, style, workflow, or creative goals. Some are brand-new to photography with their first “real” camera; some are seasoned and successful professionals. Some are street photographers, some are portrait photographers, some are landscape photographers, etc., etc.. Some shoot straight-out-of-camera JPEGs using Film Simulation Recipes; others shoot RAW. Some do both, depending on the circumstance. Some use Recipes even though they are strictly RAW photographers because they found one similar to their own style, which helps them to pre-visualize the final result while in the field. Some only use Fujifilm gear; some use many different brands. Some are strictly digital; some mostly use film, and only occasionally digital. There’s no right or wrong way to do photography, only what works best for each individual person. Fujifilm photographers are united by their passion for photography, not by any single behavior, camera setting, style, or picture aesthetic.
That diversity is one of Fujifilm’s greatest strengths. Their cameras invite experimentation—color, tone, mood—and they meet people where they are. They don’t demand a specific style; they encourage discovery. The Film Dial, for example, encourages you to try something other than Provia/STD. One person might like a particular Film Simulation Recipe for cityscape photography, while another might find it perfect for snapshots of their kids. The same settings can lead to completely different results because the photographer matters more than the settings. The tool supports the artist’s vision. Fujifilm cameras are artist tools, and there are a variety of options for diverse customers.
Above: Photographs from various Fujifilm photowalks across America using my Fujifilm X-T4 ES infrared camera.
When people try to reduce Fujifilm photographers to a single stereotype, it misses the real heart of the community. Fujifilm users aren’t defined by any cartoonish characterizations. They’re defined by curiosity, creativity, and kindness, which is what makes them special. It’s what some other brands are trying hard to corporately foster within their own communities; with Fujifilm, it’s just natural, it’s organic. The Fujifilm community cannot be summarized by a caricature because it’s too broad, too generous, and too diverse. That’s something to celebrate. Photography is richer when everyone is welcomed, and when every photographer feels free to create in the way that’s most meaningful to them. If anything, the Fujifilm community has been shunning the pesky gatekeepers—those who say that “real photographers” must do photography a certain way, and other paths are less legitimate—and are more open to new ideas or unorthodox methods. That’s a good thing.
Over the last two years I’ve met hundreds and hundreds of you—probably thousands—at various photowalks and Fujifilm events across the country, from San Diego to New York City and many places in-between. I wanted to include in this article a lot of pictures from those events (captured by my wife, Amanda, and I), to demonstrate who the community is (hint: it’s you!). Do these photos resemble the caricature that is too often portrayed across the internet? I’m sure that most stereotypes have an once of truth to them, but they’re broad strokes that are often misrepresentations of the broader group. In the case of the Fujifilm community, it’s easy to see just from these photographs that anyone and everyone is welcomed, and broad strokes don’t come anywhere close to telling the real story of who these people are. The one broad stroke that seems to apply is this: the Fujifilm community is the best in all of photography. And it’s a real honor to be a part of it with you.
Above: Photographs from various Fujifilm photowalks and events across America.
