Photoessay: Suburban B&W

You might think that you live in a boring neighborhood. You might think that there’s nothing of interest to photograph where you live. You might think that you have to go somewhere to capture good photographs. This photoessay is intended to debunk that. I live in a boring suburban neighborhood, but I have still made an effort to walk the sidewalks with my camera in hand. This particular collection features some recent black-and-white images that I’ve captured in the neighborhood where I live. In the past I’ve shared many pictures captured in my neighborhood, so these are far from the only ones or even the best ones–they are simply ones that I have not posted on here before. I hope that this article inspires you to get out into your local area with your camera, even if “getting out” is just a short trip around the block.

48703596691_62e5089c55_c

Home Peek – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 35mm f/2

48703761647_66333c64e4_c

Shadow Maker – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm

48703595931_c4bf7aa384_c

Suburban Pathway – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm

47967660157_951e4fe0d4_c

Monochrome American Flag – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Asahi Pentax Auto-Takumar 55mm f/2.2

47967660152_248225b359_c

Geo – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Asahi Pentax Auto-Takumar 55mm f/2.2

48174778686_ed29dbdab7_c

House Work – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm

48069452746_21fcf6b3da_c

Alaskan Engineer – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm

48024314487_dba7969d60_c

Ray Above The Roof – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 90mm

48703595276_9139688f65_c

Hill Behind The Homes – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm

48174882851_fed3142dd1_c

Curious Cow – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm

48703262478_8fac1d4c89_c

Grey Fence – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm

Advertisements

Comparing Film Simulation Recipes

47960367703_4be17c996b_c

I shoot JPEGs, but it’s not uncommon for me to shoot RAW+JPEG, since it gives me the opportunity to reprocess the picture in-camera, which is helpful when developing different film simulation recipes. Because of this, I was able to process a single picture I captured recently on my Fujifilm X-T30 using many of my different recipes to compare the differences. I thought that this might be helpful to some of you. Perhaps there’s one recipe that stands out to you in the pictures below that you’ve never used. Obviously different settings look better in different situations, and in this article there’s just one picture to compare, so even though you might not like how one recipe looks in this article doesn’t mean that you wouldn’t like it with different subject and in a different light. The scope of this article is quite limited, but I hope that seeing the various film simulation recipes applied to a single exposure is helpful to someone.

Not every recipe was used for this post. Some of them require a specific parameter that was not available. For example, the picture at the top was made using my HP5 Plus Push-Process recipe, which requires an ultra-high ISO, so it wasn’t possible to apply it to the exposure below. Other recipes, such as my faded color and faded monochrome, require double exposures. There are other film simulation recipes that you could try not represented below, and I invite you to investigate the different options to see if there’s one or more that work well for your photography. Let me know in the comments which film simulation recipe is your favorite and which in your opinion fits the exposure below best.

Color

B&W

My Fujifilm X-T30 Acros Film Simulation Recipe (Agfa APX 400)

47630904731_5754573aa2_c

Cloud Over The White Ridge – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

I made a new Acros recipe! I’ve been playing around lately with the Acros settings on my Fujifilm X-T30, trying to create a certain look (which I’m still working on), and I stumbled upon some interesting settings. I tried them out for a few days and wanted to share my findings with you. I think some of you might like this one!

This recipe is not intended to mimic the look of any particular film, but it’s in the neighborhood of a couple different black-and-white stocks. The closest might be Agfa APX 400 (the newer version), but it’s not an exact match for that film. I don’t think it really matters if it’s an exact match or not, it has an analog black-and-white look that’s easy to appreciate!

47557834522_a3bb78d448_c

Shopping Carts – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

The idea behind this film simulation recipe is to have a lower-contrast option that doesn’t look flat. It seems to be especially well suited for high-contrast scenes, but there’s a certain beauty in low-contrast scenes where it produces almost a faded aesthetic. This Acros recipe is really great for certain situations, and it’s one of my favorite Acros recipes that I’ve created. If you don’t have an X-Trans IV camera, you can still use this recipe, except you can’t use Color Chrome Effect or Toning, so the results will be slightly different, but still very similar.

Acros (Acros+Y, Acros+R, Acros+G)
Dynamic Range: DR400
Highlight: -2
Shadow: +4
Noise Reduction: -4
Sharpening: +4
Grain Effect: Weak
Color Chrome Effect: Strong
Toning: +1 (warm)
ISO: Auto up to ISO 12800
Exposure Compensation: +2/3 to +1-1/3 (typically)

Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this recipe on the Fujifilm X-T30:

46711313185_90e525ea40_c

Frozen Reservoir – Causey Reservoir, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

47630909841_b034d4c275_c

Mid Morning Mountain – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

32684212637_a8b59f9f8f_c

Head In The Clouds – Ogden Canyon, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

46701664795_8016571973_c

Mountain Obscured – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

32688127747_08fbe0ba7c_c

Reaching For Grass – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

32684256027_4009080ac5_c

Jo by a Window – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

32674744347_b20e46d310_c

Girl Sitting – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

33733744818_104e4f552b_c

Bread Cutting – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

46695198325_73b81e7edb_c

The Course Toward – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

47557840692_edf7617f3a_c

Asleep – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

46702179015_a498b1c0b0_c

Couch – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

40643673753_252782234e_c

Three Vases By A Window – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

47626856951_6ffbc4a168_c

White Flower Bouquet – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

47610284661_7147125c2e_c

Dead Rose Leaves – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

33733604518_6aa197985f_c

Hiding Hydrant – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Acros

Understanding Acros Film Simulation Options On Fujifilm X Cameras

46567436664_aed7dc8581_c

B&W Film With Colored Filters – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm has included on X-Trans III and IV cameras four Acros Film Simulation options: Acros, Acros+Y, Acros+R, and Acros+G. I’ve been asked a few times to explain the differences between these options. On my Acros Film Simulation recipes I never mention which one to use, I only say to use any or all of them, so that has left some confusion on what’s the best choice. Which Acros Film Simulation should you choose?

With real black-and-white film, you can use colored filters to manipulate the shades of grey. Since there are no colors, the film interprets colors between black and white. You can change how the film interprets the color, and what grey you get, by using different filters. Take a look at the graphic below to see an explanation of how different color filters change the grey on black-and-white film.

You cannot use colored filters on your X-Trans camera to achieve this same effect, so Fujifilm has given you three “filter” options for Acros: +Y, which simulates the use of a yellow filter, +R, which simulates the use of a red filter, and +G, which simulates the use of a green filter. You might notice that, in black-and-white film photography, there are more options than you are given on your X-Trans camera, but at least you have some choices.

While these different “filter” Acros options simulate the look of using filters, the actual results aren’t a 100% match. The manipulation of grey is not nearly as pronounced as using colored filters on film, and it’s not exactly the same shift, either. One thing that can help achieve desired results is using the white balance shift in conjunction with the different Acros options. It takes a little extra thought to figure out how adjusting the color balance will change the way the film simulation interprets the color in grey, but it can be worth the effort.

To help you understand what the different Acros Film Simulation options are doing to different colors, I made an image in color and re-processed it in-camera using all four Acros choices. Take a look!

46378913195_de00e5b280_c

Fujifilm X-T20 – Velvia

40329085493_2c7ca3844a_c

Acros

40329113573_686fe87673_c

Acros+Y

32351963917_5fab81c23f_c

Acros+R

46570553974_ba9235fb1d_c

Acros+G

The differences between the different Acros Film Simulations might not seem immediately obvious, but take a closer look. Notice that the red paint is a little lighter and the blue paint is a little darker in the Acros+R image. However, in the Acros+G image the red paint is darker and the blue paint is lighter. These small manipulations in the shades of grey are what the different Acros options provide.

How do you use this information in a practical way? When should you consider using the different Acros Film Simulations? When would you want to change the shade of grey of a particular color? It’s really difficult to give generalized answers to those questions because what works for one person and one photograph may not work for another. You really must think in grey and consider how contrast will work in an image, and how to best achieve that using the different Acros options.

47281084441_145f04a9c2_c

Monochrome Mountain Majesty – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T20 – Acros+R

A common example of when Acros+R might work well is in landscape photography where the sky is a deep blue. You can turn the sky dark grey or even black, which will create dramatic contrast against clouds or a snow-capped peak. Acros+R will lighten reds, so sometimes in portraits it can lighten a face, but it can make lips blend in, which might be bad. Acros+G, which darkens reds, can sometimes work well for dramatic portraits.

There is a lot to consider when it comes to choosing the most appropriate Acros Film Simulation for a particular circumstance. You have to know what each one will do, and decide what shade of grey you want the different colors to be, in order to make the right selection. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but it’s not too hard to figure out with practice. My suggestion is to try them all in different situations, and study the differences closely to better understand what each one does.

Fujifilm Acros Film Simulation Recipes

43704351561_99d9a85420_c

Taos Tourist – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

Acros is one of the most popular film simulations available on Fujifilm X-Trans cameras. It looks incredibly similar to the black-and-white film that it was named after. In fact, in my opinion, it produces the most film-like results of any settings on any camera! It’s easy to see the draw to the analog-esque results produced by the Acros film simulation.

I love Acros and I have used it as the base for a bunch of different film simulation recipes. It’s possible to achieve a number of different interesting looks straight out of camera by adjusting the settings. I plan to create even more film simulation recipes using Acros in the coming months. As I do, I will add them to this article.

Below you will find all of my different film simulation recipes that I have created that use Acros. If you haven’t tried them all, I personally invite you to do so and see which are your favorites! My personal favorite is Tri-X Push-Process, but they each have their own usefulness and charm. Let me know in the comments which recipe you like most!

Even though the different recipes say X100F and X-Pro2, they are completely compatible with any Fujifilm X-Trans III or IV camera. For example, you don’t have to use the X100F recipes exclusively on the X100F. You can use any of my recipes on any X-Trans III camera.

Original Acros

Acros Push-Process

Agfa Scala

Ilford HP5 Plus

Tri-X Push Process

Using White Balance Shift For Black & White

44919199595_5c338a0434_z

Dramatic Sky Over The Wasatch Front – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T20

Just a couple of weeks ago I posted an article about using white balance shift to achieve different looks in color photographs. What you may not be aware of is that white balance shift can be used to adjust the look of black-and-white images, and it can sometimes be surprisingly dramatic how much it changes things. White balance shift is an unexpected tool that allows you to better achieve desired results in monochrome.

When you shift the white balance it changes how different colors are rendered, so it only makes sense that the grey interpretation of those colors would also be different. Some colors might appear as darker shades of grey and some as lighter. The tones shift, creating a slightly different rendering of the scene. It could be very subtle or it could be quite apparent, but indeed the monochrome interpretation has been altered.

Let’s take a look at the photo below. I reprocessed the same exposure using the RAW developer built into the Fujifilm X-T20, with each version having identical settings except for the white balance shift. I used the Acros+R Film Simulation for this image. As you can see, each adjustment changes the look of the image. For instance, the sky has some areas of bright white in the top version, which is the overall brightest picture, but not the bottom version, which is overall the darkest picture. The highlights on the mountain are handled a little differently in the top and bottom versions. The two middle versions fall in-between, and are only very subtly different from each other.

45833443971_4561aa55f5_z

White balance shift: +9 Red & 0 Blue

31962706268_b6c7ce698a_z

White balance shift: 0 Red & -9 Blue

45784267862_712cc8b223_z

White balance shift: 0 Red & +9 Blue

45833450611_40d56ede35_z

White balance shift: -9 Red & 0 Blue

If I were to use Acros+G, the white balance shift would manipulate the image differently than what you see above. It still changes things, but not in the same way. That goes for Acros and Acros+Y, as well. It makes sense when you consider that Acros+Y, Acros+R, and Acros+G settings are designed to simulate the look of using colored filters on real black-and-white film. One must consider the color cast that is being applied to an image, and how the different Acros options will render that.

I’m still figuring out how to use this knowledge in actual real life situations. It’s one thing to apply it when redeveloping a RAW file, and another thing to use it in the field, applying it before the exposure. The latter option is where I’d like to be, but it will take a lot more practice. It’s certainly fun to play with! White balance shift is an interesting option for getting the grey tones more precisely where you want them to be in black and white photographs.

My Fujifilm X100F Agfa Scala Film Simulation Recipe

42006515070_f1e6fbc4fb_z

Kitchen – Waco, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

I love the Acros film simulation that Fujifilm included in their X-Trans III cameras. It’s the closest thing to actual film that I have ever found in a digital camera. I made two different Acros recipes for my X100F: original recipe and Extra Crispy Push-Process. I love both; however, I find myself using Acros Push-Process more than my “standard” settings just because it’s more dramatic. I will sometimes adjust each recipe to taste, depending on the situation.

What’s interesting about black-and-white film photography is that all the different film options look fairly similar, yet people have their one or two film stocks that they absolutely love. The differences in contrast, dynamic range and grain aren’t typically wildly different. Black-and-white films are more alike than not alike, but there are indeed differences, sometimes very subtle, sometimes quite noticeable. What is more unique to each film is what can be done in the lab, as each film will respond to different development techniques differently. There’s a lot that can be done in the darkroom to set apart the films from each other. In fact, one film stock could have many different looks, depending on what exactly you do with it.

This film simulation recipe was made by just messing around with the settings. I found something that I liked so I shot with it for awhile. The more I used it the more I liked it. As I was shooting with it, I kept having this feeling that it resembled some film that I’d used before, but I couldn’t put my finger on exactly which one. After a few weeks I finally figured it out: these settings produce results similar to Agfa Scala.

43704351561_99d9a85420_z

Taos Tourist – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

Agfa Scala was a black-and-white slide film. It was unusual in that it was a reversal film and not a negative film. Most black-and-white films are negatives, and most reversal films are color. If you shot a lot of slides, this was an intriguing choice. I used it a number of times. The last roll of Scala that I shot couldn’t be developed as it required a special process that had been discontinued (it’s my understanding that there is a lab in Denver that can now develop Scala). There were people who really loved Scala, and there were people who really did not, mostly because it wasn’t a negative film. Since it was a slide, there wasn’t a whole lot one could do to manipulate the look it produced.

It was quite by accident that I created an Agfa Scala film simulation for my Fujifilm X100F. I’m glad that I stumbled upon it, because it produces excellent results. Interestingly enough, it only looks subtly different than my original Acros recipe, and I think that real Acros and real Scala also produce similar results, and the small differences are, to an extent, accurately replicated in the two recipes. It was a happy accident, and sometimes it’s better to be lucky than good.

Acros (Acros+Y, Acros+R, Acros+G)
Dynamic Range: DR100
Highlight: +4
Shadow: 0
Noise Reduction: -3
Sharpening: 0
Grain Effect: Weak
ISO: Auto up to ISO 6400
Exposure Compensation: -1/3 to +1/3 (typically)

Example photos, all straight-out-of-camera JPEGs captured using my Fujifilm X100F Agfa Scala Film Simulation recipe:

28879123997_ba53b4a293_z

Two Towers – Dallas, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

41887992030_ae0db30d24_z

Santuario de Guadalupe – Santa Fe, NM – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

43260928404_9e9ae5e671_z

Cafe Flowers – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

42911793245_405f0bf002_z

Monochrome Silos – Waco, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

43065138515_c431cd57a1_z

Storm Shelter – McKinney, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

43735534292_2047a3ce40_z

Truck Stop – Bowie, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

43783547951_964d8fee30_z

Ex Lover – Amarillo, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

42880137625_a21d538d15_z

Semi & Dinosaur – Santa Rosa, NM – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

43804460782_76cd176ef7_z

Grain Hoppers – Westlake, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

43135178644_08d62fd81e_z

BNSF Alliance Yard – Haslet, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

28879124087_476ccd7f5c_z

Kitchen Camera – Waco, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

42044092120_b16a52c6e7_z

Apples To Apples – Haslet, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

42923079055_21913d9b86_z

Forgotten Sandals – Princeton, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

43700881372_d1d7f84886_z

Flower In The Pond – Princeton, TX – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

43556865292_eab8be36b8_z

Apple Tree Fence – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X100F “Agfa Scala”

Road Trip: Grand Canyon National Park, Part 2: Monochrome

40238695694_e16083fa6a_z

Canyon Cliffs – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

Part 1 – Color

I’ve heard it said that at Grand Canyon National Park your widest lens isn’t wide enough and your longest lens isn’t long enough, no matter how wide-angle or telephoto those lenses might be. I’ve been to the Grand Canyon several times, and each time I’ve felt that way. The place is amazing, yet it seems difficult to do it justice with a camera.

The canyon is huge! The national park is almost 2,000 square miles. The Colorado River traverses 277 miles through it. At its deepest point (or, really, the highest part of the rim to the river) is 6,000′. The longest stretch across rim-to-rim is 18 miles. It’s hard to effectively portray this scale in a photograph.

The Grand Canyon is the most photographed landmark in Arizona and one of the most photographed places in America, with tens of thousands of images created within the park daily. The task of creating something that’s photographically unique is nearly impossible. I’m sure that there are hundreds of pictures that look almost identical to mine. One has to spend significant time within the park, as well as exercise the creative mind, in order to capture something different than what’s already been done before.

40905092422_58a01d5294_z

Watchtower Sky – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

I was attempting art with some of the photographs that I captured at the Grand Canyon. Other images were family snapshots meant simply for memories. There’s a difference between interpreting and documenting. Both are valid and serve different purposes, and they each take a different approach to accomplish. In this article you’ll find both.

I used my Fujifilm X100F for most of these pictures, which are all straight-out-of-camera JPEGs. The Acros Film Simulation makes for exceptional monochrome images, and I used my Acros and Acros Push-Process film simulations for these X100F images. I used my Fujifilm X-A3 with a Jupiter 21M lens for three of these pictures, which are also camera-made JPEGs. I used the Monochrome film simulation, which isn’t as good as Acros, but the X-A3 doesn’t have Acros so I couldn’t use it.

I love black-and-white photography, and Grand Canyon National Park is a wonderful place to create monochrome images. I look forward to returning. Grand Canyon is a special place, and it’s been much too long between visits. Maybe next time I can stay a little longer.

27076395208_120057abd2_z

Kids Approaching The Rim – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

27076892548_8a39e954fc_z

Maricopa Point – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M 

27076275648_7a484434c8_z

Canyon Juniper – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40947155591_5dea336b79_z

Boy Riding Backwards – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

39137378580_9de85b1613_z

Strapped In Her Stroller – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40905264272_b4d7c11d7d_z

Joy of Window Shopping – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

27075980918_f15b0142fe_z

From Behind Glass – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40905116902_8d3dfae789_z

Two Young Explorers – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

27076163748_e149be83ee_z

Tree Over Arch – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40052872605_aaec54c852_z

Of Light & Shadow – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

27075874718_59bc8ee49a_z

Canyon Grand – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40946810181_76472ca380_z

Scraggly Tree At Grand Canyon – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40946512741_3fa4db6ddb_z

Looking West From Desert View – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

39137245550_16a3ce1258_z

The Watchtower – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40946622501_d271705da7_z

Mary’s Watchtower – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40904937822_04f63be131_z

Watchtower Sun – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

27075536598_89ebae2a6f_z

Desert Watchtower – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

39137128640_d4086ce412_z

Telescoping – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

26075105167_085b6efa68_z

Canyon River – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M

39137026640_ae1d40dc51_z

Sky Above The Canyon Below – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

26075335847_fd7a3bf059_z

The Grand View – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

40053463155_6b5d6922f9_z

Heavenly Sky – Valle, AZ – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M

40946429051_6e64cbf1ce_z

Passed By – Williams, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

For The Love of Fujifilm Acros Film Simulation

39072850734_3a393b1a02_z

Mount Nebo – Mona, UT – Fujifilm X100F

I really love the different film simulations available on my Fujifilm X100F. There is one that I like more than the others, and it’s Acros. The contrast, tonality and grain are simply beautiful, and Acros has a true film-like aesthetic.

I know, that’s been said so much that it’s almost cliche, and, besides, not everyone wants a film look. I appreciate the look of film and I like it much more than the digital aesthetic. I grew up on analog photography, I shot tons of 35mm and 120 film, and to me it’s how photography should look. Digital is far more convenient than film, so it can be hard to justify the hassle of film. The best of both worlds would be the convenience of digital with a film aesthetic.

I’ve been trying to get a film look from my digital files for awhile. I’ve used different software options, such as Alien Skin Exposure and Nik Silver Efex, which are both excellent, to achieve the look that I want. The Acros Film Simulation on my Fujifilm X100F is every bit as good (maybe better) as what I would get using either of those editing programs, and I get it straight out of the camera, no editing required.

One aspect of Acros that Fujifilm got especially right is the grain. Digital noise, which is the modern equivalent of film grain, doesn’t match the look of actual silver grain, and the aesthetic of it is far inferior (although X-Trans noise is better looking than most). Adding a layer of faux grain over top of an image can get you closer (and Alien Skin does a better job with this than anyone in my opinion), but it’s still not the same. The “grain” found in my Acros JPEGs more resembles actual film grain than anything else I’ve found in digital photography.

38968992855_5e832c998c_z

Apache Sky – Mountain Green, UT – Fujifilm X100F

If you were to scan actual film and compare it side-by-side to images captured with the Acros Film Simulation, you’d have a tough time identifying which is film and which is digital. Same thing if you printed from the film and from the digital file, and asked people to identify which is which. The Acros Film Simulation doesn’t look all that digital as it more closely resembles analog.

Images captured with Acros look beautiful. They look nice viewed from a distance and up close, on a computer screen or printed and hung on a wall. Even though the film simulation produces a JPEG file and not RAW, the results are what one would expect to achieve if they post-processed a RAW file. This isn’t typical camera-made JPEG stuff.

Great black-and-white results without hassle is what the Acros Film Simulation delivers. That’s the convenience of digital photography merged with the quality of film photography. I have two different settings, a “standard” Acros and a “push-process” Acros, that I frequently use, and they’re very good. The photographs in this article are examples of both that I’ve captured over the last several weeks.

I remember the “old days” of film photography. It was a slow process. Loading the film, using the entire roll before you could change it, rewinding it by hand, then all of the darkroom work–winding it onto a reel in complete darkness, baths in chemicals and water, drying, printing a contact sheet, then making prints. One print could take hours of work to get right. It wasn’t easy, but that’s the way it was, and the results made it worthwhile. Now, thanks to the X100F and Acros, I can achieve similar results with ease.

27614263759_87052864cc_z

One Way Or Another – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

39395101361_d65a1a9b2b_z

Sanitary Sewer Surprise – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

24675140047_919b979cc0_z

Palm Shadow – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X100F

38883995295_6295bddc2b_z

I-15 Overpass – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X100F

25672318998_c7ba4b8eef_z

Serious Coffee – Taylorsville, UT – Fujifilm X100F

39395027661_65c0dafbef_z

Agave Drops – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

39394428591_eb81f966aa_z

Shelf Owls – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

27295676869_b82eae38be_z

Hot Coffee – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X100F

24674771617_fe2937f19c_z

Bird Bath – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

25524790448_2a61c4061b_z

Aunt & Niece – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

Photoessay: B&W Cacti

24528799337_f8de301ab8_z

Barbs – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

One thing that I did on my Christmas visit to Arizona was photograph cacti. You can find cactus all over the place there. The spiky shrubs are common in Arizona landscaping, and a short walk into the desert will reveal even more. There are over 60 varieties of cactus that grow there. I only photographed a few different types, including Organ Pipe, Saguaro, Barbary Fig, Cholla, and a couple others that I couldn’t identify.

The ten photographs in this article are all camera-made JPEGs; however, I used X RAW Studio to process the RAW files (if you aren’t sure what X RAW Studio is, be sure to click the link), fine-tuning my Across Push-Process Film Simulation recipe. For most of these I increased the shadows to +4, and for some of them I reduced highlights to +3. I adjusted the exposure by 1/3 stop (either plus or minus) for a few of the pictures, as well.

I love the film-look that the Fujifilm X100F produces. A few years back I captured some cactus pictures in Arizona using a Minolta XG-1 and Kodak T-Max 400 film. What I get from the X100F using Acros and what I got back from the lab using the film gear are surprisingly similar. You can achieve film-like results with any digital camera using software, such as Nik Silver Efex or Alien Skin Exposure (both of which I’ve used extensively in the past), but with Fujifilm you can get it straight from the camera if you want.

People have told me, “I don’t get your fascination with film. I don’t like the film-look.” Different strokes for different folks. I personally don’t like pictures that look digital. I compare it to listening to an MP3 file versus an analog record. The MP3 will be more cold and clean, while the analog sound will have more warmth and character. Digital music is way more convenient, and that’s why it is so common.

Digital photography is way more convenient than analog photography, but that doesn’t necessarily make it better. I appreciate the characteristics of film, and the ability to achieve that look while enjoying the conveniences of digital is something I’m thrilled about. One thing I especially like about Fujifilm is that they maintain their analog soul in the digital age.

38686218854_d19d61ed22_z

Cactus Needles – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

38516510105_f003d9e3b5_z

Cactus Shrub – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

38516374865_fb7ed1d563_z

Arms Up – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

27613940469_73cd3b23dd_z

Old & Weathered – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

24525534127_0c0486d397_z

Layers – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

24525525667_ee372ebc0c_z

Minimal Protection – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

38516527705_02cdb86119_z

Drama – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

39360961812_129df46e50_z

Finger Spikes – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F

25524903808_236b931f32_z

Still Surviving – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F