Subscribe to get access
Read more of this content when you join the Fuji X Weekly Creative Collective today! Click here to learn more.
Black-and-white pictures are abstract by nature. They’re not faithful reproductions of the world as we see it. Because it is abstract, the photographer is invited to capture the scene in a unique way, with a vision that is dissimilar to—and perhaps even the opposite of—reality. It’s not so much about what the scene is, but about how we see the scene through a divergent eye, and how we can express that to the viewer. It’s a timeless approach to fine-art photography.
The strength of color photographs is color, but it’s also its weakness. When color works within a color theory—perhaps contrasting or harmonious—it can create an especially dramatic or beautiful picture; however, when the colors within an image work against each other, it can be a distraction. B&W photos remove the distraction of color, allowing the viewer to see the important elements without color fighting for their attention—it’s the art of subtraction.
Black-and-white photography is about light and shadow. It’s about contrast. It’s about shape. Texture. Pattern. Space. Emotion. Those are very important elements to color photography, too, but they’re even more critical to B&W pictures. Mastering monochrome will make you a better photographer, even for your color work.
Join myself and Fujifilm X-Photographer Nathalie Boucry as we finish our discussion of B&W photography in-depth on SOOC Live this Friday, August 25th, at 10:00 AM Pacific Time, 1:00 PM Eastern. I’ve included the video below so that you can easily find it on Friday. Also, if you haven’t uploaded your photographs captured with the Kodak Tri-X 400, Kodak T-Max P3200, Ilford HP5 Plus 400, and/or Acros Film Simulation Recipes, be sure to do so ASAP (click here)! There’s not much time, so don’t delay. I hope to see you on Friday!
Also, if you missed our the initial discussion of black-and-white photography, check it out below:
The world is full of color, so why would one want to photograph in black-and-white? It’s so old-fashioned anyway. Are there any good reasons to make monochrome pictures in 2023?
In 1826, the first photograph was captured by Joseph Nicéphore Niépce in France. It was black-and-white because the first process was B&W. But then in 1861 the first color picture was made by James Clerk Maxwell and Thomas Sutton in Scotland. That should have been the end of B&W photos, right? Actually, color photography didn’t catch on for a very long time because the process to create them was much more complex than B&W, and their color reproduction not particularly accurate. Kodak launched Kodachrome slide film in 1935, which was the first reasonably accurate color process. That should have been the end of B&W, but it wasn’t. In fact, many photographers shunned color photography, and derided it as for amateurs. Black-and-white was for the serious, while color was not.
The New American Color movement of the 1960’s and ’70’s is really what made color photography an acceptable art form. It challenged the idea that “real” photography was only in monochrome. Color images could be just as good as, or perhaps even better than, B&W pictures. It revolutionized photography.
That was so long ago. Color photography is the norm now, not black-and-white. Your digital camera captures a color picture, and you have to convert it to B&W if you want to see in shades of grey. B&W has become a niche of sorts.
So why should you shoot black-and-white photographs in 2023? What reasons are there, other than nostalgia for a time long gone? I love B&W photography, so let me offer a few to you.
Black-and-white pictures are abstract by nature. They’re not faithful reproductions of the world as we see it. Because it is abstract, the photographer is invited to capture the scene in a unique way, with a vision that is dissimilar to, and perhaps even the opposite of, reality. It’s not so much about what the scene is, but about how we see the scene through a divergent eye, and how we can express that to the viewer. It’s a timeless approach to fine-art photography.
The strength of color photographs is color, but it’s also its weakness. When color works within a color theory—perhaps contrasting or harmonious—it can create an especially dramatic or beautiful picture; however, when the colors within an image work against each other, it can be a distraction. B&W photos remove the distraction of color, allowing the viewer to see the important elements without color fighting for their attention—it’s the art of subtraction.
Black-and-white photography is about light and shadow. It’s about contrast. It’s about shape. Texture. Pattern. Space. Emotion. Those are very important elements to color photography, too, but they’re even more critical to B&W pictures. Mastering monochrome will make you a better photographer, even for your color work.
Fujifilm cameras are particularly great for black-and-white photography thanks to their wonderful film simulations: Monochrome and especially Acros. Many different Film Simulation Recipes can be made using these as the base, with a wide variety of characteristics. Pick one that looks interesting to you, and shoot with it for a day or two to see what you get. My personal favorite is Kodak Tri-X 400, but there are so many that are really good, it’s hard to go wrong with any of them.
Whether you’ve been shooting black-and-white for decades and decades, or if you never have before but are interested, I invite you to join myself and Fujifilm X-Photographer Nathalie Boucry as we discuss B&W photography in-depth on SOOC Live this Thursday, August 3rd, at 10:00 AM Pacific Time, 1:00 PM Eastern. I’ve included it below so that you can easily find in on Thursday.
If you missed last Thursday’s SOOC Live broadcast, where Nathalie and I finished our discussion of travel photography, be sure to watch it now. I’ve included it below, or visit the SOOC Live YouTube Channel. Also, if you haven’t seen the Viewers’ Images slideshow (your pictures!), I’ve added that to the bottom of this article—be sure to watch!
Pentax just announced the K3 III Monochrome DSLR. Yes, a black-and-white only camera!
I find a few things intriguing by this. First, a lot of people say that there’s no market for such a camera, that only the Leica enthusiasts with Leica-like budgets will buy a monochrome-only camera. Yet Pentax apparently disagrees. I hope they’re right. It’s certainly a risk that they’re taking, but I think it will do well enough simply based on all the initial hype, which there’s quite a bit of.
The Pentax K3 III Monochrome (such an uninspired name, right?) has a 26-megapixel APS-C sensor inside. Sound familiar? My guess is that it’s the same Sony sensor that’s found in Fujifilm X-Trans IV models, just with the color filter array removed. I could be wrong about that. Perhaps more importantly, this monochrome sensor is clearly available for camera makers to buy, because Pentax is doing so, which means Fujifilm could, too.
The price difference that Pentax is charging for the monochrome vs the regular model is $500. That seems pretty steep, but it’s a niche product, so a premium should be expected. I suspect that Fujifilm would likely charge a similar amount—$300 to $500—for a monochrome version of one of their models, if they were to make one.
I’ve been suggesting for years that Fujifilm should make a dedicated black-and-white camera, and call it the Acros Edition. Why? With an X-Trans sensor, 55% of the light-sensitive sensor elements are recording luminosity information while 45% are recording color information. With a monochrome sensor, 100% of the light-sensitive sensor elements are recording luminosity information. Because of this, you get higher perceived resolution, as pictures will appear more richly detailed, and there’s more shadow latitude, which improves dynamic range and high-ISO capabilities. You can also use color filters just like with black-and-white film. It’s definitely not a camera that everyone will want, but some—myself included—will line up for it the day it is announced.
Basically, it will have only the Acros film simulation, and the same JPEG options as other X-Trans cameras (except no Color or White Balance). I can imagine Fujifilm offering a stronger Grain option than what’s currently available on the other models, and perhaps an Acros Hi and Acros Low, for higher or lower contrast rendering. I’d also like to see a lifted shadow option for a faded look. The X-Pan aspect ratio should absolutely be included. Otherwise, I don’t think too many modifications will be required to the menu.
Hopefully Fujifilm is already working on this. They should be, anyway, but they’re probably not. Ideally, it would be an X-Pro or X100 model, but at this point I’d take any, except for the X-S or X-H lines. Seriously, a Fujifilm X-Pro3 Acros Edition or X100V Acros Edition would be simply incredible! It would definitely catch people’s attention. If Fujifilm wants a WOW product, this is it right here.
Anders Lindborg is, in my opinion, the guru on Fujifilm black-and-white Film Simulation Recipes. After all, he invented the Kodak Tri-X 400, Ilford HP5 Plus 400, and Ilford Pan F Plus 50 recipes, and co-created the Kodak T-Max 400 recipe. These are some of my favorite monochrome options, and Kodak Tri-X 400 is my all-time favorite recipe, period. Anders also created the Kodak Gold v2 recipe, seven Fujicolor Pro 160NS recipes, seven Fujicolor Pro 400H recipes, and made an important D-Range Priority discovery. This Ilford FP4 Plus 125 recipe was invented by Anders Lindborg, too, so I know that you will love it! It’s a real honor to publish it on Fuji X Weekly, and I appreciate his willingness to share it with all of you.
The story doesn’t end there. Recently, Fuji X Weekly reader Dan Allen wanted to help create an Ilford FP4 Plus 125 recipe, and he purchased some rolls of the film to shoot side-by-side with his Fujifilm camera. When he told me this, I sent him Anders’ recipe to try. After he did his experiment, Dan shared with me the results, which were quite fascinating. It turns out that Dan’s Ilford frames and his Fujifilm digital pictures (using Anders’ recipe) looked similar, but the Ilford frames had less contrast, with softer highlights and shadows, so I made a few small modifications to Anders’ recipe to better match Dan’s pictures. Of course, one film can have many different looks, depending on how it was shot, developed, printed, and/or scanned. “This particular film stock,” Anders told me, “is highly tunable, ranging from super clean to ultra gritty.” No single recipe will ever recreate every possible aesthetic from the film.
“Just like the real thing,” Anders explained to me, “a slight underexposure protects the highlights and improves contrast. Centered around the upper half of the grayscale, this recipe ranges from soft and dreamy to sharp and almost graphic with pencil-like lines. It will almost never go entirely black and is great for shadow details.” Ilford originally introduced FP4 Plus 125 way back in 1968, and in 2014 they improved the emulsion, which is what’s currently available.
If you want to use Anders Lindborg’s recipe as he created it, set Dynamic Range to DR100, Highlight to 0, and Shadow to -1. He says that you can “really go crazy” with Clarity and Grain—try Clarity anywhere from -2 to +4, with Grain Weak/Small when using less Clarity (for a cleaner look) and Grain Strong/Large when using more Clarity (for a grittier look). Also, feel free to use the different faux filter options (+Ye, +R, +G) with this recipe.
The Ilford FP4 Plus 125 Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with X-Trans V cameras, which (as of this writing) are the Fujifilm X-T5, X-H2, and X-H2S, and newer X-Trans IV cameras: X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, and X-T30 II. If you have an X100V or X-Pro3, you can use Anders’ unmodified version (explained above); for the X-T3, X-T30, plus X-Trans III, additionally ignore Clarity and Grain size. This recipe is especially well suited for mid-to-high contrast scenes, paying careful attention to the highlights so as to not clip them.
Film Simulation: Monochrome
Grain Effect: Weak, Large
Color Chrome Effect: Off
Color Chrome FX Blue: Off
White Balance: Daylight, +6 Red & -8 Blue
Dynamic Range: DR200
Highlight: -0.5
Shadow: -1.5
Monochromatic Color: 0 WC & 0 MG
Sharpness: 0
High ISO NR: -4
Clarity: +2
ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400
Exposure Compensation: -1 to -1/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this “Ilford FP4 Plus 125” Film Simulation Recipe on my Fujifilm X-T5:
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Fujifilm X-T5 in black: Amazon B&H
Fujifilm X-T5 in silver: Amazon B&H
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 250 more on the Fuji X Weekly — Film Recipes App!
I recently visited a vista in Arizona that overlooks The Valley of the Sun, which is the nickname given to the Phoenix metropolitan area (beginning back in the 1930’s); the official name is The Salt River Valley. I brought along my Fujifilm X-H1, plus my Fujinon 90mm f/2, Vivitar 135mm f/2.8, and Fujinon 100-400mm lenses. Programmed into the X-H1 was my Acros Push Process Film Simulation Recipe. I thought it would be interesting to use these longer lenses to capture the views of the vast valley, plus the desert bluff behind me—never forget to check behind you when photographing, because it can be easy to miss something great when you’re not focused on it.
When I was a kid, my friends and I often played “catch” with a football. Sometimes whoever the quarterback was would shout, “Go long!” You’d run as fast as you could for a good distance, turn around to see the ball wizzing through the air—maybe you’d catch it and it would be amazing, maybe you ran too far or not far enough and the ball hit the ground.
Let’s see what happens when you “go long” with your lenses.
Read more of this content when you join the Fuji X Weekly Creative Collective today! Click here to learn more.
I’ve been saying for awhile now that Fujifilm should make a dedicated black-and-white camera, kind of like the Leica M10 Monochrom. I would absolutely love that, and would shell out gobs of money for it, assuming that I actually have the funds available to do so. Of course, Fujifilm X cameras are already great at capturing black-and-white photographs straight-out-of-camera, but a true monochrome camera would be on a whole other level.
For this week’s Fuji Features post, I found some articles and videos on the web related to this topic is some way. I hope you enjoy!
The Obscurity of Light – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – “Dramatic Monochrome”
A couple of weeks ago when I was discussing the possibility of Fujifilm creating a black-and-white only camera, something that I came to learn by accident is that the Monochrome film simulation is pretty darn good. On X-Trans III & IV cameras, I have always used the Acros film simulation because it is beautiful and has a film-like quality to it. But there’s something about the “old-fashioned” Monochrome film simulation that’s nice, as well. I had never made a Monochrome film simulation for X-Trans III & IV cameras, so I set out to do so.
At first I wasn’t sure exactly what I wanted, so I decided that the best starting point was to revisit the iconic photographs of the great photographers from the 1930’s, ’40’s and ’50’s—people like Ansel Adams, Andre Kertesz, Robert Doisneau, Weegee, Pual Strand, Elliott Erwitt and others. I realized that I was drawn to the high-contrast pictures that these photographers had created. I wanted to create a recipe that mimics that look in-camera. These settings, which I call Dramatic Monochrome, are what resulted from that.
Francis Peak – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – “Dramatic Monochrome”
For those with X-Trans III sensors, which don’t have the Color Chrome Effect, you’ll get similar results, but it won’t be quite as dramatic. The difference isn’t very big, so don’t worry about it. I would consider using +2 for Sharpness on X-Trans III instead of +3. On X-Trans IV cameras, you could give a +1 toning for a subtle warm look, such as what would happen if you gave a print a quick Sepia bath.
Monochrome (+Y, +R, +G)
Dynamic Range: DR200
Highlight: +4
Shadow: +4
Grain: Strong
Color Chrome Effect: Strong
Toning: 0
Sharpening: +3
Noise Reduction: -4
Exposure Compensation: 0 to +2/3 (typically)
ISO: Auto up to ISO 12800
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this Dramatic Monochrome film simulation recipe on my Fujifilm X-T30:
Chair Near a Window – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Shadow Ware – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
White Pillow – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Santa Fe – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Young Piano Hands – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Clouds Above The Snow – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Wasatch Ridge Winter – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Lines In The Snow – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Clouds Over The Frosted Hill – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
White Beyond Dark – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Frosted – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
Darkness & Light – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30
See also: Film Simulation Recipes
Help Fuji X Weekly
Nobody pays me to write the content found on fujixweekly.com. There's a real cost to operating and maintaining this site, not to mention all the time that I pour into it. If you appreciated this article, please consider making a one-time gift contribution. Thank you!
$5.00
Terrible Ford – Boulder City, NV – Fujifilm X-T30
I’ve passed through Nevada many times, often only stopping for gas or lunch. It never seems to be my destination. I’m headed somewhere else, and I have to go through the Silver State to get to where I’m going. While I have stayed longer than a few hours, most of the time I’m through Nevada so quickly that it’s easy to forget that I was ever there. The photographs in this article were captured during those times where I just passed through, and didn’t stay. In fact, many of them were captured from inside my car. I hope that you enjoy this set!
Plaza Hound – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X-T30
I-15 Overpass – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X100F
Chance of Rain – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X-T30
Abstract Roof Lines – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X-T30
Empty Hoppers – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X-T30
Palm Shadow – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X100F
See also: November Arizona
Rays Over Colorado River – Lake Mead Nat’l Rec. Area, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 35mm f/2
Along U.S. Highway 93, about 12 miles south of the Hoover Dam, there’s a scenic view pullout, which offers tremendous views of desert mountains and canyons and a glimpse of the Colorado River at Willow Beach. This is part of the Lake Mead National Recreation Area. It’s easy to drive right on past this spot, as I have done many times before. Those who do stop here are rewarded with an incredible vista. It’s not the Grand Canyon, but it’s like a small glimpse of the Grand Canyon. It’s a quintessential Arizona landscape. Actually, you can see both Arizona and Nevada, as the river marks the boundary between the two states.
When I was at this scenic pullout last week, there was a storm passing through, which provided a dramatic sky with streaking light rays from the peeking sun. It was an amazing sight, yet short lived. I had my Fujifilm X-T30 with me, alternating between a Fujinon 35mm f/2 and a Fujinon 90mm f/2 attached to the front. A more wide-angle lens might have been nice, but these are the two lenses that I had with me. I captured a number of frames, then the great light disappeared as quickly as it had come.
Because I had a camera with me, and I decided to stop, I was able to witness and record this beautiful moment. Many cars zoomed down the highway, perhaps witnessing the scene quickly from behind their windows, or perhaps not noticing it at all, and only a few stopped. I’m thankful that I was one of the few who stopped, and what a great reward I was given for doing so. Sometimes the journey is the destination, especially if you are a photographer.
Light Streaming – Lake Mead Nat’l Rec. Area, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 90mm f/2
Light & Mesa – Lake Mead Nat’l Rec. Area, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 90mm f/2
Shining Down – Lake Mead Nat’l Rec. Area, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 90mm f/2
Pouring Light Over Desert – Lake Mead Nat’l Rec. Area, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 90mm f/2
Dramatic Desert Sky – Lake Mead Nat’l Rec. Area, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 35mm f/2
Rays Over The Desert – Lake Mead Nat’l Rec. Area, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 35mm f/2
Rays Over Willow Beach – Lake Mead Nat’l Rec. Area, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 35mm f/2
You might think that you live in a boring neighborhood. You might think that there’s nothing of interest to photograph where you live. You might think that you have to go somewhere to capture good photographs. This photoessay is intended to debunk that. I live in a boring suburban neighborhood, but I have still made an effort to walk the sidewalks with my camera in hand. This particular collection features some recent black-and-white images that I’ve captured in the neighborhood where I live. In the past I’ve shared many pictures captured in my neighborhood, so these are far from the only ones or even the best ones–they are simply ones that I have not posted on here before. I hope that this article inspires you to get out into your local area with your camera, even if “getting out” is just a short trip around the block.
Home Peek – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 35mm f/2
Shadow Maker – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm
Suburban Pathway – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm
Monochrome American Flag – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Asahi Pentax Auto-Takumar 55mm f/2.2
Geo – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Asahi Pentax Auto-Takumar 55mm f/2.2
House Work – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm
Alaskan Engineer – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm
Ray Above The Roof – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 90mm
Hill Behind The Homes – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm
Curious Cow – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm
Grey Fence – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & 35mm
Brush Strokes Over The Great Salt Lake – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
The Great Salt Lake is the largest natural lake west of the Mississippi River, the largest salt water lake in the western hemisphere and the 33rd largest lake in the world. It’s massive! It can seem almost ocean-like, or perhaps more like a large ocean bay, but it is located far from any ocean. One difference between the Great Salt Lake and an ocean is that the lake is much saltier, and brine shrimp are the only thing alive in it. It is one of Utah’s natural wonders!
The largest island in the Great Salt Lake is Antelope Island, which is 15 miles long and five miles wide. The highest point, Frary Peak, is 6,594′, and is often snow-capped in the winter. It’s accessible by road via a causeway. Antelope Island is managed by the Utah State Park system.
Kit Carson and John C. Fremont, who visited Antelope Island in 1845, gave it its name after hunting pronghorn antelope on the island. Daddy Stump and Fielding Garr would build homes on Antelope Island over the next few years. This is a place that people have been coming to for a long time. In fact, there is evidence that native people have spent time on the island since at least the time of Christ.
Antelope Island seems like a world away from the Salt Lake City metro area, even though it is located very close to the city. It looks remote, and it must have been very remote before the road was built and the city grew. Interestingly enough, the oldest non-Native American structure in Utah is located on the island: an adobe ranch house built in 1848. The Fielding Garr Ranch was a working ranch from 1848 to 1981, and now the old ranch is open to the public for self-guided tours.
Wildlife abounds on Antelope Island, including buffalo, mule deer, pronghorn antelope, big horn sheep and many other animals. At one time the bison herd on Antelope Island was the largest in America. There are a huge variety of birds that migrate across the area.
The water is often calm and the reflections can be incredible. There are sandy beaches. There are trails that curve across the rugged landscape. There is a unique beauty to Antelope Island that draws me back. It’s one of my favorite places to photograph. But it’s also disgusting! There’s a certain “rotten egg” smell that can be found near the shores. There are tons and tons of bugs, including biting no-see-ums, brine flies (that cover the shore like a thick cloud), mosquitoes, tons of spiders (venomous and non-venomous), among other things. It’s pretty common to see dead birds. There’s plenty to love and hate about this place. I try to look beyond the gross to see the beauty.
Something interesting that I’ve discovered since moving to the Salt Lake City area almost three years ago is that most people who grew up in Utah don’t visit Antelope Island. Maybe they went on a school field trip as a kid, but they haven’t been back since. The majority of people you find on the island are from out-of-town. The locals who do visit are often those that moved to the area from someplace else. It’s too bad for those who don’t make the short trip to the island, because they’re really missing out!
Antelope Island is incredibly beautiful and tranquil. It is indeed odd, and one has to purposefully look beyond the negative aspects of the place to truly appreciate it. I feel like it is a secret treasure that is easily overlooked, and I feel honored to have found it and photographed it.
Frary Fence – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
Coming Storm – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3
Island Beach View – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
White Rock Bay Vista – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3
Bush In The Crag – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3
Clouds Over The Great Salt Lake – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
White Rock Bay – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Land & Lake Layers – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
Promontory Peninsula – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
Sunlight Falling On The Salty Water – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
Light Streaming Over Antelope Island – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Wasatch Mountains From The Causeway – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Frary Peak Reflected – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Deer Statue – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Old Salty Stump – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Frozen Stump – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
Ice, Lake & Mountains – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Cracked Earth – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Buffalo Snow – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
Bison In The Road – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Area Closed For Bison – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
One Buffalo – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3
Pulling Hard – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Park Patrol – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
On The Fence – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
State Park Workday – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Waiting Game – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Leather Gloves – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Circle Hashtag – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Fielding Garr Ranch Fence – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Empty Marina – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Boys Playing In The Great Salt Lake – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Pollution – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
Buffalo Corral – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Antelope Island is the largest island in the Great Salt Lake. It’s home to about 700 wild buffalo. Every year Antelope Island State Park rounds up the buffalo herd so that they can be counted, examined, and vaccinated. This event, which is open to the public, happens every autumn and takes place over a seven day period.
I had the opportunity to photograph a portion of this year’s buffalo roundup, which I was very excited about. I missed the actual roundup, where a bunch of cowboys on horseback traverse the island to guide the bison to the corral, but I did get to witness the second phase, where the animals are seen one at a time by a veterinarian. This operation takes a team of about 40 people several days to complete. It’s fascinating to watch, but it’s also a slow process and there is a lot of downtime where very little is happening.
I used my Fujifilm X100F to capture these photographs, which are all unedited camera-made JPEGs. For the camera settings I used the [Not] My Fujifilm X-Pro2 Tri-X Cross Process Film Simulation Recipe, utilizing the X100F’s built-in neutral density filter so that I could use high ISOs even in bright midday light. I took a photojournalist approach, and I think these settings worked particularly well for it. I’m pleased with how this series turned out and I hope that you enjoy the pictures!
White Rock Bay – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Park Patrol – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Time To Watch Buffalo – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Waiting For A Buffalo – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Buffalo Corral Workers – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Buffalo Head – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Cautious Buffalo – Antelope Island, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Running Bison Calf – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Roundup Downtime – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Rope On The Gate – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Leather Gloves – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
A Buffalo – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Workers Waiting – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Between Buffalo – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
On The Fence – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Utah Cowboys – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Park Ranger – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Bison Barriers – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
From The Holding Pen – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Mother & Calf – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Buffalo Track – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Three Bison – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Tractor Ride – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
State Park Workday – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujfilm X100F
Circular Gate Operator – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Rope Preparation – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Bison Spying – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Rope Pull – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Pulling Hard – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Rope Runner – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Waiting Games – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Waiting Buffalo – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Bison Skull – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Island Shore View – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
I have created many wonderful film simulation recipes for X-Trans III cameras, but none of those can be used on my Fujifilm XF10. I had to create brand-new film simulation recipes for this camera. I used my experience with other Fujifilm cameras to create different straight-out-of-camera looks that I would appreciate.
You can only have one custom setting saved on the XF10. The default settings that I have programmed for the camera are my Classic Chrome recipe. If I want a look with more saturation I’ll adjust the settings to my Velvia recipe. If I want black-and-white I’ll adjust the settings to my Monochrome recipe. It’s a little bit of a pain to be constantly switching, so I try to not go back-and-forth any more than I need to.
While I use these recipes on my XF10, they’re compatible with the X-T100, X-A5, X-A3 and any X-Trans I or X-Trans II camera. The rendition might vary slightly from model-to-model, but the overall look should be fairly consistent. These settings won’t translate to X-Trans III or X-Trans IV.
Aside from some minor cropping, the photographs in this article are all straight-out-of-camera JPEGs. I like to keep my workflow as simple as possible, and Fujifilm’s different film simulation options allow me to rely on camera-made JPEGs. Using JPEGs instead of RAW saves me a ton of time. I appreciate being in front of a computer less and behind a camera more.
Below are my Fujifilm XF10 film simulation recipes!
Classic Chrome
Ghosts of the Past – Ogden, UT – Fujifilm XF10
This is my go-to film simulation option. I use it significantly more often than the other recipes. It has a classic Kodak film look, although not exactly like any one in particular. I think it most closely resembles 1960’s era Ektachrome, but it’s not an exact match. Even so, it looks great and is quite versatile. It has a lot of contrast, just vibrant enough colors and a warm tone.
Classic Chrome
Dynamic Range: DR-Auto
Highlight: +1 (0 sometimes in high-contrast situations)
Shadow: +2
Color: +1
Noise Reduction: -2
Sharpening: -1
White Balance: Auto, +3 Red & -4 Blue
Kids At The Lake – East Canyon SP, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Bolsey 100 – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Terminal Windows – SLC, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Flag On A Pole – Layton, UT – Fujifilm XF10
FED 5c Window – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Velvia
Vibrant Bloom – Riverdale, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Velvia was one of my favorite films. It produced incredibly vibrant colors. Apparently Fujifilm didn’t intend to make such a wild film, it was more of an accident than anything else, but it quickly become the standard film for color landscape photography. Something interesting that I recently learned is one of the people who helped develop Velvia for Fujifilm also helped develop the Velvia Film Simulation. The film simulation isn’t a 100% match to Velvia 50, but perhaps closer to Velvia 100F. My recipe is intended to produce a look that is closer to Velvia 50.
Velvia
Dynamic Range: DR-Auto
Highlight: 0 (+1 in low-contrast situations, -1 in high-contrast situations)
Shadow: +1
Color: +2
Noise Reduction: -2
Sharpening: -1
White Balance: Auto, +1 Red & -3 Blue
Historic Dragon – Ogden, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Scattering of Red – Fruit Heights, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Sunlight Through The Forest – Bountiful, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Green Leaves – Layton, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Yellow Amid Red – Riverdale, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Monochrome
Shy Horse – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm XF10
The XF10 lacks Fujifilm’s greatest film simulation: Acros. Instead it has the old Monochrome option, which is alright but not nearly as good as Acros. Despite this, it is possible to get nice black-and-white camera-made JPEGs from the XF10. There are four different options, and to understand what each does one must understand what different colored filters do to black-and-white film, as +Y simulates using a yellow filter, +R simulates a red filter and +G simulates a green filter. If you know how to use color filters on black-and-white film then you know when to pick which option on the XF10.
Monochrome (Monochrome+Y, Monochrome+R, Monochrome+G)
Dynamic Range: DR-Auto
Highlight: +1 (+2 in low-contrast situations)
Shadow: +2 (+1 in high-contrast situations)
Noise Reduction: -2
Sharpening: -1
Wishes Waiting – Fruit Heights, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Plastic Fingers – Ogden, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Hat Abstract – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Dream – Ogden, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Tilted Pier – East Canyon SP, UT – Fujifilm XF10
Help Fuji X Weekly
Nobody pays me to write the content found on fujixweekly.com. There's a real cost to operating and maintaining this site, not to mention all the time that I pour into it. If you appreciated this article, please consider making a one-time gift contribution. Thank you!
$5.00
Storm Over Pueblo – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
One thing I found particularly fascinating about the Taos Pueblo is that this historic site is still inhabited. This is a real home to many people. The doors and windows belong to someone. Inside there are living spaces, bedrooms and kitchens. Surrounding the two large pueblos are even more houses. There’s a church. This is a community.
Visiting Taos is like being invited into a stranger’s home. You have the opportunity to see a more intimate side of things, and perhaps come away with a different perspective. What I found in Taos was not what I had pictured in my mind prior to visiting, but something much more interesting. There’s a certain profoundness to this place that’s difficult to put into words.
I appreciate those in Taos for allowing me in, answering my questions and showing hospitality and kindness. Unfortunately, my stay was much too short. I had only a couple of hours to spend at the pueblo, and then it was time to continue down the highway to Santa Fe. I truly hope that the opportunity to return comes sooner than later.
Taos Tourist – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X100F
Jacob’s Ladder – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
Dream Ladder – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X100F
Tree & Shed – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
Bells & Crosses – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
Pueblo Sky – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X100F
Taos & Sky – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
Second Floor Pueblo – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
Pueblo Roof – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
Boxy – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
Taos Pueblo Apartments – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm
Storm Approaching Taos – Taos, NM – Fujifilm X100F
Stu – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Colorado New Mexico West Texas East Texas Oklahoma (Color) Wyoming
Pawhuska is a rural town in northeastern Oklahoma that once boomed. The 1920’s were especially roaring, but the 1930’s included an oil bust, the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl, scars of which are clearly evident to this day. The Boy Scouts of America began in Pawhuska over 100 years ago. The town is also home to Drummond Ranch, which is one of the largest ranches in the country. Ree Drummond has a popular television cooking show and has authored a number of books. She also has a store and restaurant in town, and that’s why my wife and I were there.
The town is quite small, but photographic opportunities were numerous. In fact, I made more exposures in Pawhuska than any other place we visited on our road trip. There’s a lot of history, character and hospitality packed into the little town in the middle of nowhere. Pawhuska proved to be a great experience! I felt as though I left many potential pictures unphotographed, so perhaps another visit will be in store in the future.
Double Flag – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Kitchen Window – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Bakery – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
County Courthouse – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Broken Glass Through The Glass – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Industrial Brick – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Industrial Design – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Star – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
The Other Mother – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
The Merc – Pawhuska, OK – X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Mercantile – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X100F – US HWY 60
Cafe Flowers – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X100F – US HWY 60
Wet Tables – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X100F – US HWY 60
Unlikely – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Pawhuska Rain – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X100F – US HWY 60
Osage County – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X100F – OK HWY 99
Thunder Sky – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X100F – OK HWY 99
Rural Cows – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Horse Gate – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Two Horses In The Grass – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Rural Mail – Pawhuska, OK – Fujifilm X-Pro2 & 60mm – US HWY 60
Great Sand Dunes Sign – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
In July my family and I visited the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve near Alamosa, Colorado. This national park features the tallest sand dunes in North America. The towering Sangre de Cristo Mountains loom in the background. It’s an impressive and unusual landscape!
During wetter months the Medano Creek flows beneath the sand dunes, and in order to get to the dunes one must get their feet wet. We were there during a dry month and there was no water in the wide creek bed. Unsurprisingly, a visit to the sand dunes requires a significant amount of walking on sand, which means that it takes more effort and more time to get from one point to another. It’s no walk in the park, and it’s best to come prepared with plenty of water and ready for the hike.
While we were there, once on the dunes, the wind was blustery and it kicked up the sand quite fiercely. It pelted our legs and would occasionally blow in our faces and get into our eyes. It was more of an issue for the kids since they’re shorter. It was not a fun experience, so we did not stay on the dunes for very long.
The place offers amazing photographic opportunities. If you like working with shadows and highlights and abstract shapes, this is the place for you! The Great Sand Dunes National Park is one of those special landscapes where it’s difficult to come away with bad pictures. I had with me a Fujifilm X-Pro2 with a Fujinon 60mm f/2.4 Macro lens attached to the front. The X-Pro2 is weather sealed, but the lens is not. Thankfully I did not get dust on the sensor. I would strongly recommend not changing lenses while at the dunes, as you’re just asking for trouble by doing so.
We were only at the sand dunes for a couple of hours. It would have been great if we could have stayed longer. I think that a sunrise hike to the top would have been epic, but time just didn’t allow for it. Even so, we were glad for the opportunity that we did have. I’m happy with the photographs and memories that I came away with.
Great Sand Dunes – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Mountains & Sand Across The Valley – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Mountain of Sand – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Stroller Alone – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Sand & Sangre de Cristo – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Running In The Sand – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
It’s A Long Ways To The Top – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Mountain, Sand & Sky – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Sand & Sierra Sky – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Improbability – Great Sand Dunes National Park, CO
Sand Walkers – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Passerby – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Silver Sand – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Sandal In The Sand – Great Sand Dunes NP, CO
Canyon Cliffs – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
I’ve heard it said that at Grand Canyon National Park your widest lens isn’t wide enough and your longest lens isn’t long enough, no matter how wide-angle or telephoto those lenses might be. I’ve been to the Grand Canyon several times, and each time I’ve felt that way. The place is amazing, yet it seems difficult to do it justice with a camera.
The canyon is huge! The national park is almost 2,000 square miles. The Colorado River traverses 277 miles through it. At its deepest point (or, really, the highest part of the rim to the river) is 6,000′. The longest stretch across rim-to-rim is 18 miles. It’s hard to effectively portray this scale in a photograph.
The Grand Canyon is the most photographed landmark in Arizona and one of the most photographed places in America, with tens of thousands of images created within the park daily. The task of creating something that’s photographically unique is nearly impossible. I’m sure that there are hundreds of pictures that look almost identical to mine. One has to spend significant time within the park, as well as exercise the creative mind, in order to capture something different than what’s already been done before.
Watchtower Sky – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
I was attempting art with some of the photographs that I captured at the Grand Canyon. Other images were family snapshots meant simply for memories. There’s a difference between interpreting and documenting. Both are valid and serve different purposes, and they each take a different approach to accomplish. In this article you’ll find both.
I used my Fujifilm X100F for most of these pictures, which are all straight-out-of-camera JPEGs. The Acros Film Simulation makes for exceptional monochrome images, and I used my Acros and Acros Push-Process film simulations for these X100F images. I used my Fujifilm X-A3 with a Jupiter 21M lens for three of these pictures, which are also camera-made JPEGs. I used the Monochrome film simulation, which isn’t as good as Acros, but the X-A3 doesn’t have Acros so I couldn’t use it.
I love black-and-white photography, and Grand Canyon National Park is a wonderful place to create monochrome images. I look forward to returning. Grand Canyon is a special place, and it’s been much too long between visits. Maybe next time I can stay a little longer.
Kids Approaching The Rim – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Maricopa Point – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Canyon Juniper – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Boy Riding Backwards – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Strapped In Her Stroller – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Joy of Window Shopping – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
From Behind Glass – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Two Young Explorers – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Tree Over Arch – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Of Light & Shadow – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Canyon Grand – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Scraggly Tree At Grand Canyon – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Looking West From Desert View – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
The Watchtower – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Mary’s Watchtower – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Watchtower Sun – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Desert Watchtower – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Telescoping – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Canyon River – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Sky Above The Canyon Below – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
The Grand View – Grand Canyon NP, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Heavenly Sky – Valle, AZ – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Passed By – Williams, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Subtlety – Canyonlands NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
I surprised myself with how few images I captured in monochrome of Canyonlands National Park. During that visit I most often chose color, as the lighting made for wonderful color photographs, and I only went with black-and-white here and there. This is the opposite of what happened at Arches National Park earlier in the day, in which I chose monochrome more often because of the poor light. In general, I’m more drawn towards black-and-white photography, and so it was very unusual for me to focus so much on color.
Canyonlands was a joy to photograph and I felt like I came away with some print-worthy exposures. The pictures in this post were mostly captured using my Fujifilm X-A3 with a Jupiter 21M lens attached, which is a good telephoto combination. I used the Monochrome+R film simulation, which isn’t as good as Acros, but the X-A3 doesn’t have Acros and so I couldn’t use it (the lone Fujifilm X100F image was captured using Acros). All of these photographs are straight-out-of-camera JPEGs, which I prefer because it saves me tons of time. A couple of them could have been slightly improved if I had edited the RAW exposure, but the JPEGs are certainly good enough in this case.
If I ever have the chance, I’d love to spend a week at Canyonlands National Park. I feel like I barely touched the surface of the potential photo opportunities there. It seems like a place that could provide plenty of portfolio material. It was just so breathtakingly beautiful and peaceful. I just can’t say enough about Canyonlands! If you ever have the chance to go, definitely go, you won’t be disappointed.
La Sal Moon – Canyonlands NP, UT – Fuji X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
La Sal From Island In The Sky – Canyonlands NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Mountains Through Mesa Arch – Canyonlands NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Tree at Grand View Overlook – Canyonlands NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Oh, Deer – Canyonlands NP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Monochrome Mesas – Canyonlands NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Arch & La Sal – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
As I mentioned in part one, the lighting for photography was pretty terrible during the few hours that I was at Arches National Park. Still, the place was nothing short of amazing! I wanted to capture it all, and found that black-and-white was often a better choice than color. I think if I had been there closer to sunrise or sunset, color would have been the way to go. Because I was up against the harsh midday sun, monochrome seemed to better express the abnormally stunning landscape.
On the X100F I used my Acros and Acros Push-Process film simulations, except that I had the dynamic range set to DR400. I often chose Acros+R to simulate the use of a red filter (making the blue sky darker), although the results are closer to what one would get with an orange filter in real black-and-white film photography and not a red filter. On the X-A3 I primarily used the B&W+R film simulation with the highlights and shadows set to +2, which seems to give the right amount of contrast in most situations.
All of the photographs in this article are camera-made JPEGs. If I had relied on RAW and used Lightroom or some other software on my computer, I’d probably still be editing the pictures. Instead, I saved a ton of time and relied on the camera’s great JPEG processor. I’m happy with the results. I didn’t capture any portfolio worthy pictures, but all things considered, I managed at least a few decent photographs that I’m proud to show here. I just hope for the opportunity to return and photograph Arches National Park in better light.
If you ever have the chance to go, I highly recommend this place. It’s so unusual, filled with seemingly impossible formations and brilliant colors. It’s a landscape photographer’s playground. Or just a great place to wander in the wonder of nature. I enjoyed my short visit to Arches National Park, and I cannot wait to return, hopefully sooner than later.
Park Avenue – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Queen Nefertiti – Arches NP, UT – Fuji X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Beanpole – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Mt. Peale In The Distance – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
La Sal Range – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Monochrome Rocks – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Gossip – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Balanced Rock – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Balance – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Graboid – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Monument – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Window Arch & La Sal – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Bird Flew – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Monochrome Arch – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Rock Window – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Mt Peale – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Tree In Rocky Terrain – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Window Arch In Monochrome – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Cairn & Arch – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
The Desert Is Unforgiving – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Three Stone Peaks – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Monochrome Layers – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Over The Desert Ridge – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Hidden Human Head – Arches NP, UT – Fujifilm X-A3 & Jupiter 21M
Mount Nebo – Mona, UT – Fujifilm X100F
I really love the different film simulations available on my Fujifilm X100F. There is one that I like more than the others, and it’s Acros. The contrast, tonality and grain are simply beautiful, and Acros has a true film-like aesthetic.
I know, that’s been said so much that it’s almost cliche, and, besides, not everyone wants a film look. I appreciate the look of film and I like it much more than the digital aesthetic. I grew up on analog photography, I shot tons of 35mm and 120 film, and to me it’s how photography should look. Digital is far more convenient than film, so it can be hard to justify the hassle of film. The best of both worlds would be the convenience of digital with a film aesthetic.
I’ve been trying to get a film look from my digital files for awhile. I’ve used different software options, such as Alien Skin Exposure and Nik Silver Efex, which are both excellent, to achieve the look that I want. The Acros Film Simulation on my Fujifilm X100F is every bit as good (maybe better) as what I would get using either of those editing programs, and I get it straight out of the camera, no editing required.
One aspect of Acros that Fujifilm got especially right is the grain. Digital noise, which is the modern equivalent of film grain, doesn’t match the look of actual silver grain, and the aesthetic of it is far inferior (although X-Trans noise is better looking than most). Adding a layer of faux grain over top of an image can get you closer (and Alien Skin does a better job with this than anyone in my opinion), but it’s still not the same. The “grain” found in my Acros JPEGs more resembles actual film grain than anything else I’ve found in digital photography.
Apache Sky – Mountain Green, UT – Fujifilm X100F
If you were to scan actual film and compare it side-by-side to images captured with the Acros Film Simulation, you’d have a tough time identifying which is film and which is digital. Same thing if you printed from the film and from the digital file, and asked people to identify which is which. The Acros Film Simulation doesn’t look all that digital as it more closely resembles analog.
Images captured with Acros look beautiful. They look nice viewed from a distance and up close, on a computer screen or printed and hung on a wall. Even though the film simulation produces a JPEG file and not RAW, the results are what one would expect to achieve if they post-processed a RAW file. This isn’t typical camera-made JPEG stuff.
Great black-and-white results without hassle is what the Acros Film Simulation delivers. That’s the convenience of digital photography merged with the quality of film photography. I have two different settings, a “standard” Acros and a “push-process” Acros, that I frequently use, and they’re very good. The photographs in this article are examples of both that I’ve captured over the last several weeks.
I remember the “old days” of film photography. It was a slow process. Loading the film, using the entire roll before you could change it, rewinding it by hand, then all of the darkroom work–winding it onto a reel in complete darkness, baths in chemicals and water, drying, printing a contact sheet, then making prints. One print could take hours of work to get right. It wasn’t easy, but that’s the way it was, and the results made it worthwhile. Now, thanks to the X100F and Acros, I can achieve similar results with ease.
One Way Or Another – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Sanitary Sewer Surprise – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Palm Shadow – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X100F
I-15 Overpass – Las Vegas, NV – Fujifilm X100F
Serious Coffee – Taylorsville, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Agave Drops – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Shelf Owls – Peoria, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Hot Coffee – South Weber, UT – Fujifilm X100F
Bird Bath – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F
Aunt & Niece – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100F