Fujirumors recently conducted a survey of the “best” and “worst” Fujifilm-related gear released in 2025. This included Fujifilm cameras—specifically, the X-E5, X-T30 III, X half, GFX100RF, and GFX Eterna 55—as well as lenses, including third-party lenses. Instax was in the list, too. The survey had two questions: which was the best, and which was the worst. The insinuation in the body of the article was that whatever product was chosen as the “worst” would be considered a flop.
No surprise to me, the Fujifilm X-E5 was ranked as the “best” Fujifilm-related product of 2025, receiving nearly 40% of the votes. It’s an excellent camera that’s been pretty well received. A strong argument can be made that the GFX100RF or Eterna 55 are technically the best, but the majority of those voting are likely not in the GFX system. The X-T30 III will probably end up selling more copies than any of the other cameras, which doesn’t necessarily make it the “best” only the best selling due to having the best value. It’s all subjective.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
The Fujifilm X half far and away received the most votes for “worst” Fujifilm-related product, receiving 50% of the responses. I’m not surprised because the survey was on Fujirumors, and the X half is largely not intended for the market that audience generally is. Just like I’d be shocked if the Instax Mini LiPlay won best product on that site, while it wouldn’t be shocking at all if it did so on an Instax-centric website.
The primary customers of the X half are not those in X-series; it’s those with an Instax camera, those who shoot film on a retro point-and-shoot, those who like digicams, and those who have an interest in photography but have no interest in using a mirrorless or DSLR model. They want film-like results without fuss. I would bet that two-thirds of those who have bought an X half don’t own and have never owned an X-series camera, aside from their new X half. If we were to revisit this in a couple of years, I would wager that the X half was the gateway into the X-series for thousands of people, which is exactly what the purpose of that camera is. Someone buys the X half today, next year they buy an X-T30 III or X100VI or something like that.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
The question, of course, is this: does that make the X half the worst Fujifilm-related product of 2025? If it’s successful at bringing in new customers, particularly an often overlook subset of potential customers, isn’t that good? I don’t know exactly how well the X half is or isn’t selling, especially since those statistics are hard to come by. Apparently, it was the number one selling camera in Japan over the summer, significantly outselling the second most popular. After talking with a few different camera stores, it seems to be doing well, but the camera is not nearly as hot as the X100VI or even the X-E5. I hear that it’s more popular in Asian markets than in Europe or America, so maybe that explains it.
I can tell you this: I have an X half, and it was my most-used camera on an RV roadtrip up the Atlantic coast over the summer. It’s fun for casual snapshots, and was perfect for documenting our journey. My wifeand I both use it, and sometimes we fight over it. With that said, it will never replace my X-T5 or X-E5 or X100VI or any other model. It’s not that type of camera. It’s going to give you the “worst” image quality of any current X-series model, but in the best way possible. So maybe it is the worst Fujifilm-related product, but that’s what makes it great. And it’s definitely not a flop, it’s just intended for a different group of people than the usual suspects, which certainly can be a great way to expand market share.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Last night Fujifilm announced the brand-new X-T30 III camera and Fujinon XC 13-33mm f/3.5-6.3 lens. That’s a lot of threes! I’m not going to spend much time talking about either of these products, but I did want to briefly mention their existence.
The X-T30 III is almost identical to the X-T30 II, which was pretty much identical to the X-T30, launched in early 2019. The big changes for the third iteration are: X-Processor 5 and Film Dial. All of the other changes are directly related to those two.
X-Processor 5 brings with it more computing power and more efficient processing, which allows for autofocus and video improvements (including 6K Open Gate), as well as the Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace Film Simulations. Probably better battery life, too. The Film Dial replaces the Drive Dial, which has now been relocated to a button on the back, similar to the Fujifilm X-E5, X100VI, and X-Pro3. Some people are greatly offended by this, but the Drive button has worked quite sufficiently on those popular models and has been a complete nonissue, so there’s no reason to believe it won’t be the same for the X-T30 III. Some people like to complain for the sake of complaining. The benefit of the Film Dial is that it can store up to three Film Simulation Recipes, bringing the total possible Recipes that can be programmed into the camera at any one time up to 11 (certainly Nigel Tufnel would buy this camera just for this). As of right now, the X-T30 III and X-E5 are the only two cameras capable of 11 Recipes; however, I hope that Fujifilm brings the FS1/FS2/FS3 Recipe option to the X-T50 and X-M5, and any future models with the Film Dial.
The one negative with the Film Dial on the X-T30 III is that—like the X-E5—it’s limited to only six hard-set Film Simulations. Unfortunately, Classic Negative and Nostalgic Neg. were both excluded. For Classic Negative, that’s inexplicable, as it’s one of the most popular and iconic options. I think if Fujifilm had used the same Film Dial found on the X-T50 and X-M5, that would have been better. While the Film Dial isn’t perfect and certainly can be improved, it’s still a feature that I love, and I’m happy to see it on this camera.
The lens? I personally don’t use zooms very often. I’m more of a prime guy myself. It seems like a budget-friendly alternative to the 10-24mm f/4. I’m sure it’s sufficiently good, and a decent starter kit lens. I have no intentions of owning it, personally. Sold with the X-T30 III, I’m sure it’s worthwhile for $150; I definitely wouldn’t spend $400 on one.
There are two (very annoying) complaints that I’ve seen regarding this announcement: Fujifilm should not release any camera until they have Sony-like AF, and where’s the X-Pro4? Let’s discuss both.
I’ve talked about autofocus at great lengths (just type “autofocus” in the search bar), so I won’t spend much energy on it. My basic argument, though, is that Fujifilm’s AF is pretty good, better than what’s existed for the vast majority of photography, and if you can’t make it work for you, it’s largely user error. Yes, your fault. People are offended by that, but sometimes the truth hurts. Once you accept that truth, it reveals a path forward so that you can move beyond your AF obstacles. It might take learning some new skills and/or learning some new things about your camera that you didn’t realize. Fujifilm’s AF is more than sufficient for 99%+ photographers and situations if you know what you’re doing. Those who constantly complain about it have 1) unrealistic expectations (Canikony brands have been making AF for much, much longer, have larger R&D budgets, and larger teams, so it stands to reason that theirs is and always will be better), 2) an unwillingness to accept that they are a part of the problem (more so than the gear), and 3) no motivation for self-improvement.
Can and will Fujifilm improve their AF? Absolutely. I have zero doubts that they’re working hard on that right now and have been for years. Will those improvements have a practical benefit for most of their customers? Probably not, because we’re nearing the peak of an inverted U curve, which means that each improvement will have a smaller and smaller and smaller impact (this is true for every brand, especially Sony and Canon, who might actually be nearing the back side of the curve). Also, realize that any obstacle—including AF woes—can be overcome if you are willing to self-reflect and put in the work. Those who constantly complain about this topic are unwilling on both accounts.
As for the X-Pro4, which I’m predicting will be called X-Pro5, I’m somewhat confident that it will arrive within the next six months, probably announced in January or February. It will likely kick off X-Trans VI, and the X-T30 III will mark the end of the fifth-generation. In other words, the next X-Pro is coming, just have a little more patience.
Anyway, the Fujifilm X-T30 III will hold the important role of budget-friendly non-PASM model with an EVF. The X-T30 II and the X-T30 before it served this purpose very well, and, despite less fanfare, sold a heck-of-a-lot of copies. The X-T30 III will quietly be a major success, too. At only $999, it’s probably the best value camera in the lineup. Yes, some models are cheaper. Yes, some are better. But none quite offer the bang-for-the-buck that the X-T30 III does.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
The sun is beginning to set on Fujifilm’s fifth-generation of X-series cameras. Soon, dawn will break on X-Trans VI. This is a much-too-early speculation on what that might look like. In other words, take all of this with a massive grain of salt, because these are merely guesses. I don’t have any inside information. Many of my prior guesses were completely wrong, but a few were spot on—I anticipate that many of these will prove to be incorrect, too, but that some will turn out to be right.
I don’t know with certainty that the upcoming Fujifilm X-T30 III will be the final fifth-generation camera. The X-T30 II was the last fourth-generation model. The X-E series has often marked the end of a generation by being the second-to-last model. So with the recent release of the Fujifilm X-E5, and the upcoming announcement of the X-T30 III, I think it’s a pretty safe bet that the fifth-generation is coming to a close, and that the sixth-generation is right around the corner.
To start with, let’s talk about a potential timeline. I think the first sixth-generation camera will be the X-Pro5 (maybe they’ll call it X-Pro4), and it will be announced in January or February, and ship in February or March. After that will be the X-H3 and X-H3s, which will come in late-spring and/or summer. I’m going to go way out on a limb, and say that an X80 (followup to the X70) will come in fall of 2026. If this all happens, next year will be a busy year for the X-series.
In 2027, I see the X-T6 arriving in late-winter or early-spring. The X-S30 will likely follow in the summer or fall. I suspect there will be a GFX release or two, but that’s it for the X-series for that year. In 2028, I anticipate the X100VII in late-winter or early-spring, followed by the X-T60 in late-spring or early-summer, and the X-M5 in the fall. 2029 will wind down the sixth-generation, with an X-HF2 (not X-Trans, but technically X-series) early in the year and an X-E6 later in the year. There will not be a followup to the X-T30 III. It’s possible that the seventh-generation of X-Trans kicks off towards the end of 2029, possibly with an Eterna 28 (APS-C version of the GFX Eterna 55) cinema camera.
A lot will look the same between X-Trans V and X-Trans VI, as it will be mainly under-the-hood changes. I don’t anticipate any major resolution bump with X-Trans VI; I think it will be more about speed and efficiency. Will Fujifilm continue to use the same sensors? They might. I can see a partially stacked 40mp sensor in the X-Pro3, X-H2, X-T6, and maybe X100VII. I can see them using the 40mp X-Trans V sensor (but paired with a new processor) in the X-T60, X-E6, and maybe X100VII (the X100VII could go either way between non-stacked and partially stacked). I don’t think that the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor will be used any longer, but a new sensor (maybe 30mp) will be added to the lineup, found in the X80, X-S30, and X-M5. The X-H3s might continue to use the same 26mp stacked X-Trans V sensor, or it might have a new-and-improved stacked sensor.
My guess is that the X-Pro5 will have an aspect ratio dial like the GFX100RF, and will be the first X-series model with the XPan aspect ratio. It will probably have the classic EVF feature like the X-E5. It might even have a Film Dial like the X-E5. I really don’t know what else will be different, but I suspect there will be a few surprises. The X-H3s will be a lot like the X-H2s, but with some speed/efficiency improvements plus the ability to use video LUTs like the Eterna 55. The X-H3 will be a lot like the X-H2, but mainly just speed/efficiency improvements. The X80—if Fujifilm decides to make it—will be a massive success, and will serve as Fujifilm’s closest competitor to the Ricoh GR IV.
The X-T6 will be a lot like the X-T5, with mainly just speed and efficiency upgrades. The X-S30 will have a new sensor, I believe, that will boost the resolution a smidge; overall, I don’t think it will be much different than the X-S20. The X100VII will have a new-and-improved lens that can better take full advantage of the 40mp sensor, but otherwise will be quite similar to the X100VII. It could have an X-E5-like Film Dial, too. The X-T60 won’t be a whole lot different than the X-T50, just small improvements. The X-M6 will likely have a new sensor, but otherwise won’t be much different than the X-M5. The X-HF2 will have a hotshoe and/or better flash, but will still be pretty much the same. The X-E6, which might just be called the X-E5s, will just see some small improvements, like Classic Negative added to the Film Dial, and other minor refreshes.
There will probably be two new Film Simulations added: one beginning with the X-Pro5, and another with the X100VII. Some potential Film Sim ideas are Fujicolor PRO 400H emulation that turns pastel with overexposure, Natura (modeled after Natura 1600), Fortia (more vibrant than Velvia), Cross Process (modeled after Velvia 50 that’s been cross processed), Instax, and a more contrasty B&W option. I think they will add a couple more JPEG options, too. I’d like to see Halation Effect (with the options of Off, Weak, Strong) and Light Leak (Off, Intermittent, On), which Fujifilm has already invented, they just need to incorporate. Faded black and vignetting are a couple other options worth considering. They should revamp the Advanced Filters, adding Retro and Expired Film from the X half, and allow Dynamic Range, White Balance, and Grain to be selected. There’s a lot that Fujifilm could do, but a suspect it will be limited to a couple of new Film Simulations, a couple of new JPEG options, and maybe some long-overdue improvements to the Advanced Filters.
Essentially, I think the sixth-generation will look a lot like the fifth, with mostly under-the-hood improvements. If Fujifilm has ever considered releasing an X80, they should probably do so sooner than later; if they do, that camera will be the X-Trans VI headliner. The X-Pro5 will probably be the most different compared to its predecessor. My guess is that there will not be an X-T30 IV or X-T40—the X-T30 III will be the final iteration of that camera; however, they will continue to sell it well into the sixth-generation lifecycle, quietly discontinuing it 2028. Of course, all of this is speculation. Fujifilm could certainly surprise us with all sorts of things—they’ve done it before, and they’ll do it again. A lot seems pretty predictable, though; however, we should expect the unexpected, at least here and there.
A common question I get is, “Which Fujifilm X-series camera should I buy?” With so many options, it can be difficult to figure out which one is right for you. Some models are quite alike, with overlapping features and similar price points, which can be confusing—especially if you’re new to the system. Each camera in Fujifilm’s lineup has its own role to play, and understanding that role makes it much easier to choose the right one for you. To help you out, I’ll break down each X-series camera below and explain its purpose in the lineup—what it’s best at, who it’s for, and why Fujifilm made it. With that foundation, you’ll be better equipped to make your decision.
Fujifilm X-H2s
The Fujifilm X-H2s is Fujifilm’s most premium X-series camera—the flagship model. It’s designed for speed, which makes it the most ideal option for videography, as well as sports and wildlife photography. It’s the only X-series camera—and only APS-C camera—with a stacked sensor, which allows it to be faster than other models. Interestingly, a large majority of the official Fujifilm videos (found on their various YouTube channels) are filmed on this camera—if you want to know what you can do with it cinematically, there are tons and tons of excellent examples online. Because the X-H2s is the top-of-the-line option, it is also the most expensive at $2,799 (after the recent price increase across the Fujifilm lineup).
A couple of possible downsides to the X-H2s are that it’s the largest (along with the X-H2, which shares the same body), which might make it less ideal for travel or walk-around photography, and it doesn’t have the traditional tactile exposure controls that Fujifilm is known for. This is a PASM model that’s specifically intended to be appealing to those coming from Canikony brand cameras, who might not appreciate Fujifilm’s retro-styled bodies. It’s weather sealed and has two card slots (one for CFexpress Type B). The rear LCD screen is vari-angle, and can twist many directions. I find it fascinating that camera reviewers often compare the X-H2s to full-frame models; those are somewhat unfair apples-to-oranges comparisons, but you see it often, which just goes to show that this camera punches above its weight class.
If you really need speed, the Fujifilm X-H2s is your best bet. It’s the top X-series option for video, sports, and wildlife. This is the most “pro” camera in the lineup, if that’s important to you. I have never used this camera personally.
Fujifilm X-H2
The Fujifilm X-H2 is nearly identical to the X-H2s. The main difference is that, instead of a 26mp stacked X-Trans V sensor intended for speed, it has a 40mp non-stacked X-Trans V sensor intended for resolution. It’s not quite as quick as the “s” version, so it’s not as ideal for video, sports and wildlife; however, it’s still snappy, and still excellent for those situations—it’s a great hybrid camera. You simply trade a little speed for megapixels, while saving $600. You get basically the same camera for significantly less money. If you need the fastest X-series model, the “s” version is the one to get; if not, the X-H2 is quite compelling, especially if you are moving over from one of the “big three” brands. I have not used the X-H2 personally.
Fujifilm X-Pro5
There is not currently an X-Pro5. The last camera in this series was the X-Pro3, released in 2019 and discontinued in 2022. A successor is overdue, and likely to come next year (my prediction is in the spring, but that’s merely a guess). Nothing is known about the camera (not even the name… “X-Pro5” is speculation); however, it probably won’t be too dissimilar from other X-Pro models. The X-Pro series offers classic rangefinder styling, a hybrid EVF/OVF, and durability (other than the rear LCD cable on the X-Pro3… that’s another story, and probably why that camera was discontinued). X-Pro is top-of-the-line out of all the retro-styled X-series models. These cameras are beloved, they’re classics—the Leica of Fujifilm, so to speak. There’s not much to say about it at this time other than it’s coming someday, and it will likely be over $2,000 (maybe well over) when it does come. I wouldn’t be surprised if Fujifilm kicked off the sixth generation with this camera. Whenever it is released, you’ll know, because it will definitely make headlines. The picture above is of an X-Pro1.
Fujifilm X100VI
The X100 series is legendary. It’s probably the most iconic Fujifilm line, with a beautiful retro rangefinder design, including a hybrid OVF/EVF. Pairing the 40MP X-Trans V sensor with a fixed 23mm (35mm full-frame equivalent) f/2 lens, the X100VI is perfect for street, travel, and documentary photography. This iteration is the first in the series to have IBIS. The leaf shutter, built-in flash, and built-in ND filter are three especially great but often overlooked features. The X100VI is compact and discreet, yet eye catching—no wonder it is the most viral camera of all time!
Because you cannot change the lens, this camera is not for everyone; however, it can inspire you to see differently because you’re limited to one focal length, which can force you to think more creatively. The Fujifilm X100VI is my “desert island” camera—if I could only have one model for the rest of my life, it would be this one. With that said, I find that the X100-series tends to pair really well with an interchangeable-lens model, for when the 35mm-equivalent focal length just isn’t the right choice. The X100VI isn’t a point-and-shoot; it’s a premium compact, which is reflected by the $1,799 MSRP (after the recent price increase).
Fujifilm X-T5
If there’s one quintessential interchangeable-lens Fujifilm camera, it’s probably the X-T5. It closely embodies Fujifilm’s retro styling and tactile controls, while packing in their latest 40mp X-Trans V sensor and processor. You get IBIS, a three-way tilting LCD, dual card slots, and weather sealing—all in a body that still feels compact. It’s basically an X-H2, but smaller, lighter, better-looking, and cheaper. This is a premium stills-centric model, yet it’s no slouch when it comes to video capabilities. A lot of comparisons have been made to the Nikon Zf, which is a full-frame camera (not necessarily a fair equivalence), yet the X-T5 holds its own pretty well, (again) punching above its weight class.
The X-T5 is a workhorse that can do a bit of everything. It seems well suited for landscapes, portraits, travel, etc., etc.. I used this camera extensively for about a year-and-a-half, then my wife, Amanda, used it for a year (mostly portraits, theater, and video), and now I have it back, and am enjoying photographing with it again. As a stills-centric yet good-for-everything camera, it’s easy to recommend. With an MSRP of $1,899, it’s under 2K but definitely not cheap.
Fujifilm X-T50
The Fujifilm X-T50 is the little brother of the X-T5. It has the same sensor, processor, and IBIS—it’s basically the same internally as the X-T5 and even the X-H2—but lacks weather sealing and dual card slots. It’s smaller and lighter, with a little more plastic. This was the first camera with a Film Dial, which adds a bit of aesthetic versatility, and is great for exploring which Film Simulations you might like best. This is Fujifilm’s mid-range retro SLR-styled camera, but is just as capable as the higher-end X-T5.
Because this camera is smaller and lighter, it’s a little better for travel or walk-around photography. The X-T50 is a bit more beginner or enthusiast orientated than the X-T5, but you can grow with it, since it’s just as capable as the higher end model. At $1,699, it’s only a little cheaper than the X-T5. If size and weight are a priority, that might be a reason to choose this camera, or if you want a slightly less complicated camera; otherwise, the X-T5 is the better option. I really like the X-T50 personally, particularly because of the Film Dial.
Fujifilm X-E5
The Fujifilm X-E5 is the newest X-series camera. It’s basically an X-T50, but in an X100VI-like body. It’s as close as you’re going to get to an interchangeable-lens X100VI, especially when paired with pancake lenses. It’s Fujifilm’s smallest camera with an EVF, which makes it especially great for travel photography, or just everyday carry. It’s also the only model where you can program up to 11 Recipes into it. The X-E5 is the most premium camera in the X-E series, and is solidly mid-tier, with improved build quality over its predecessor. I have no doubt that this will be a big hit, even with the $1,699 price tag. If you like retro rangefinder styling, this is the interchangeable-lens camera to buy.
Fujifilm X-S20
The Fujifilm X-S20 is the little brother of the X-H2s. It’s a hybrid model that’s especially good for video, but is no slouch for stills. It uses the “old” 26mp X-Trans IV sensor paired with the new X Processor 5. It is not weather sealed and has only one card slot. It’s not necessarily retro styled, and lacks the traditional tactile dials found on most Fujifilm models; instead, it has PASM controls similar to the X-H2s and X-H2, and it has an articulating rear LCD screen. It’s intended to be appealing to those coming from Canikony brand cameras. It only has C1-C4 and not C1-C7 like many other Fujifilm cameras, for those who use Film Simulation Recipes. There are two X-S20’s in my house: one belongs to my wife, Amanda, and the other belongs to my son, Jonathan. They both really love it—in fact, my wife chose the X-S20 over the X-T5. At $1,599, this is a mid-tier camera, but it is slightly more affordable than the X-T50 and X-E5.
Fujifilm X-T30 II / X-T30 III
The current entry-level X-series camera with an EVF and retro tactile controls is the Fujifilm X-T30 II. It has the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor and X Processor 4; however, it was the very last fourth-generation model, so it does have some options that the earlier 4th-gen cameras lack, making it seem a bit less dated. At $999, it is definitely more affordable than the options above, making it a compelling choice, and probably the best overall value right now—a great beginners camera. It doesn’t have IBIS, and may not be the best option for video—although, with a gimbal or tripod, it’s certainly capable of recording quality clips.
The X-T50 was not this camera’s successor, but a whole new highly similar line that is a bit more premium. Fujifilm is about to replace the X-T30 II with (what will likely be called) the X-T30 III. Because of this, the X-T30 II can be a bit tough to find in-stock, as I believe Fujifilm has stopped production of it. If you want the best affordable Fujifilm camera, be sure to buy an X-T30 II—that is, if you can find one. Fujifilm is expected to announce the X-T30 III later this year, likely in the fall. I anticipate it being nearly identical to the X-T30 II, just with the new X Processor 5, possibly with a Film Dial like the X-T50, and perhaps a couple hundred dollars more expensive. In all likelihood, the X-T30 III will be the last fifth-generation X-series camera.
Fujifilm X-M5
The Fujifilm X-M5 is the bargain basement entry-level X-series camera, with an MSRP of $899. It has a striking rangefinder-like retro design, but lacks traditional tactile controls (it has PASM instead) and lacks an EVF. It’s the smallest and lightest interchangeable-lens model in the lineup. Like the X-S20, it pairs the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor with the X Processor 5. It’s touted as a hybrid camera that’s excellent for video, but it lacks IBIS. In a sense, X-M5 is the little brother of the X-S20, and in a sense it’s the X-E5’s smaller sibling. If you have a tight budget or if you prioritize size and weight, this camera might be for you. Between this and the X-T30 II, if you are primarily a videographer, the X-M5 is your best bet, but if you are primarily a stills photographer, I recommend the X-T30 II. It seems like a good option as your very first camera, or else as a second camera for when your larger model isn’t ideal. I’ve never used the X-M5 personally.
Fujifilm X half
Last and maybe least is the Fujifilm X half. This is technically an X-series camera, but it’s not X-Trans, and isn’t APS-C, either. It has a 1″ Bayer sensor orientated vertically, with a fixed 32mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens. It’s essentially a digital version of half-frame cameras, like the Fujica Half, Olympus Pen, Kodak H35N, and Pentax 17. The X half has as much in common with the Instax Evo line as it does the X-series, and bridges a gap between the two systems, with a foot in both camps. It’s a heck-of-a-lot of fun, but definitely less serious than all of the options above. This could be a toy for the photographer who has everything, or a casual camera for events and vacations, or a first camera for your child that shows an interest in photography. You’re unlikely to capture portfolio-worthy pictures with the X half, but for social media or scrapbooks, this camera is quite excellent. Both my wife and I enjoy using it (and have fought over it), but neither of us would chose it as our primary model. At $850, it’s a bit expensive for what it is.
Conclusion
If you’re still unsure which Fujifilm cameras are right for you, let me break it down even more simply. If you are coming from one of the big three camera companies and want the easiest transition, you’re going to look at the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-S20. If you are primarily a videographer, you’ll want to consider those same three cameras, and I’ll throw in the X-M5 if you are on a tight budget. If you simply want the best-of-the-best, the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-T5 are your top options (and the next X-Pro, whenever that comes out). If you are primarily a stills photographer, the X-T5 is top-of-the-line (the next X-Pro will be, as well), the X-T50 and X-E5 are nearly as good (and smaller), and the X-T30 II is the best bargain. The best looking cameras are the next X-Pro (assuming that Fujifilm doesn’t change much), X100VI, and X-E5. If you don’t want to invest in a whole system, and just want to dip your toes into the Fujifilm world, the X100VI is what you should buy. If you don’t have a lot of money to spend, the X-T30 II and X-M5 are the two cameras you need to consider. If you have large hands and/or plan to use long lenses, the X-H2s, X-H2, and X-S20 have the best ergonomics, and I’ll throw in the X-T5 as a bonus. If you want small and lightweight, look at the X-M5, X-E5, X100VI, and (of course) the X half. If you want the most enjoyable, the X half, X100VI, X-E5, and the next X-Pro are the ones to consider. I’m sure I’m missing some situations, but I hope this provides clarity for some of you who are trying to decide which camera to purchase, and are just unsure.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
I’m hesitant to write this review, because the Fujifilm X half is paradoxical. There’s a lot about it that’s conflicting. You can say this aspect of it is great for a certain group of people, but this aspect of it is not. This might be the most unique digital camera ever made, so it’s going to get a lot of attention, but also a lot of criticism. Trying to figure out who will most appreciate the X half (also called X-HF1) has been an intriguing endeavor.
To be completely transparent, it’s important for me to tell you upfront that Fujifilm sent me an X half to keep. Yea! Thank you, Fujifilm. I didn’t pay a dime for the camera. But I did have an X half preordered, so I was planning to spend money on one. I’m doing my best to not let my impressions be colored by Fujifilm’s kind generosity.
There are a few things that are unique about X-HF1. The headline is the vertically-mounted 1″ sensor. As far as I know, this is the very first camera to have a vertical sensor, all others are horizontal—that is, aside from cellphones. A lot of people—younger people especially—tend to photograph vertically on their cellphones, so it was just a matter of time before a camera would have a tall sensor. The X half is revolutionary because it’s the very first. I suspect there will be more in the future, and Fujifilm won’t be the only brand. Speaking of 1″ sensors, the name is a bit misleading. The surface area of a so-called 1″ sensor is the same as old 1″ Vidicon vacuum tube television cameras. So the name (“one inch”) has to do with the tube size of TV cameras from the ’50’s, ’60’s and ’70’s, and not the dimensions of the sensor.
The inspiration for the X half—and where the name comes from—are half-frame film cameras, like the Fujica Half, Olympus Pen, Kodak H35N, and Pentax 17. These cameras use half of a 35mm frame for each picture, orientated tall. Some medium-format cameras also are natively portrait orientated. Cameras that capture vertical photos are not new, but they are new in the digital age. Of course it has to be said that the X-HF1’s sensor isn’t half the size of a full-frame sensor, or even half the size of APS-C; no, the X half‘s “half” is not a mathematical term, but simply a nod to analog half-frame cameras. The 3:4 aspect ratio is also the same as half-frame cameras.
Like a half-frame film camera, the X half is capable of creating diptychs, which are two frames side-by-side combined into one image. You can do this easily in-camera using the Frame Advance Lever, or after-the-fact using the new X half app. It’s a heck-of-a-lot of fun, but I imagine that the novelty will wear off after awhile. While it will put a (customizable) bar in-between the two frames, I wish it had the option for a boarder around the whole image like in the examples above, which was done using a third-party app. Maybe Fujifilm will add this feature to the X half app in the future.
The X-HF1 is as minimalistic as it gets in the X-series. The menu has been simplified and streamlined, and a lot of settings have been left out. You cannot use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera, only the stock Film Simulations and Filters. Not all of the Film Sims made the cut, but most of them are there: Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Negative, Eterna, Acros (include +Ye, +R & +G), and Sepia. I would rather have Eterna Bleach Bypass over Sepia, but it’s a good group overall. There are a whole bunch of Filters (called Advanced Filters on other X-series cameras), some of which are borrowed from the Instax Evo cameras. My favorites are Pop Color, Light Leak, Expired Film, and Retro. These cannot be used in addition to Film Simulations—it’s one or the other, and not both. The list of Filters is quite long, and I don’t have an interest in most of them, so I wish that you could customize which ones are available, to make it easier to find and select the ones you actually want to use.
Above: Pop Color Filter
Above: Light Leak Filter
Above: Expired Film Filter
Above: Retro Filter
Pop Color is reminiscent of Fujichrome Fortia. I’d actually like to see it graduate to Film Simulation status. Light Leak, as well as filters like Halation and Vignette, should become JPEG options on other X-series cameras, that can be added to any Film Simulation. Expired Film and Retro should be added as Advanced Filters. Of the three Expired Film options, Green and Neutral are my favorites.
The only customizations that are available are Grain, Portrait Enhancer (which I believe is just Smooth Skin Effect renamed), White Balance (but no WB Shift), and Long Exposure NR. One cool thing is that these are also applied to the Filters, and not just the Film Simulations—I’d love for that to make its way to other X-series cameras. Beyond that, the Film Simulations and Filters cannot be customized to achieve various looks, which is a real bummer for someone like me who uses Recipes extensively.
Top left: Weak / Small Grain. Top right: Strong / Large Grain. Bottom: Actual Ilford Delta P3200 film
I enjoy a little grain in my photos. It adds texture that’s been common in photography for much of its existence. The X-HF1 has faux grain, with four options: Weak/Small, Weak/Large, Strong/Small, and Strong/Large. Grain set to Weak/Small on the X half is a little more pronounced than Strong/Large is on (for example) the X100VI. I wish that there was a less strong option than Weak/Small, because it’s borderline too much; however, since there’s not, I used it almost exclusively. Strong/Large is a bit ridiculous, and is reminiscent of the grain of ultra-high ISO films like Ilford Delta P3200. If you want to achieve an Ilford Delta P3200 look, the X half isn’t far off at all when Grain is set to its maximum parameters.
Another word about Grain is that it slows the camera down, much like Clarity on other X-series cameras. I found this to be odd, and my theory is that when Grain is applied, so is Clarity (maybe -2). I tried to prove this, but couldn’t, so I might be completely wrong. I have another theory that—for Film Simulations, at least, and maybe for Filters—Color is increased as exposure is increased, and is reduced as the exposure is reduced. I also tried to prove this, but got mixed results, so I’m not certain if this is how the camera is programmed, or just a natural effect of over and under exposure.
Above: Classic Negative
The camera seems to apply a heavy-handed noise reduction, and then a heavy-handed sharpening to compensate. I would love to have some control over this, as it’s not my favorite approach. It might be necessary, though, since the X-HF1 has a Bayer sensor instead of X-Trans. One benefit of X-Trans that doesn’t get discussed enough is that it allows noise to be more easily identified and controlled; Fujifilm uses this to make it more film-grain-like, and less of a nuisance. Since this is a Bayer camera, it might require a little stronger noise reduction.
Another benefit of X-Trans is that it has more green pixels (55%, compared to 50% on Bayer), which allows for more luminosity information. This provides a little more dynamic range and high-ISO capabilities. On the X half, dynamic range is quite limited. I would say it’s roughly comparable to DR100 with Highlight and Shadow set to +0.5 on other X-series cameras. It’s fairly easy to clip highlights and/or block up shadows, and is a little like slide film in this regard. Since this camera is JPEG-only (no RAW), you have to be very careful about the exposure.
Above left: ISO 1600. Above right: ISO 4000
I found that I prefer ISO 400 and below on the X half, reminiscent of Sigma Merrill cameras, which has a similar limitation. In a pinch you can go higher, especially if the picture will only be shared to social media, but I tried my best to keep the ISO at or below ISO 400 whenever possible. Because the maximum aperture of the lens is “only” f/2.8, when the sun goes down it can be very challenging to use the camera.
The X-HF1 does have a built-in flash, albeit not a great one. It doesn’t have a hotshoe, only a coldshoe. Flash photography is, unfortunately, not ideal on this camera, which is too bad, since it has a leaf shutter. If Fujifilm someday makes a second version, I hope that it either has a proper flash or a hotshoe (or both), as this current setup is mediocre at best. I kept the flash off most of the time.
Above: Flash photography on the X half
One really cool feature is called Film Camera Mode. You select either 36, 54, or 72 shots, and you are dedicated to that mode until you’ve completed your “roll of film”—which is whatever Film Simulation you chose. I do wish that 24 was an option, as it takes awhile to finish a roll. You cannot review the photos until they’ve been “developed” in the X half app. In this mode, the X-HF1 functions similarly to point-and-shoot film cameras from the 1990’s. You have to use the Frame Advance Lever in-between shots. It’s a ton of fun, but also challenging, because you have no idea if you correctly exposed, focused, or even if you framed it well. I kept forgetting to take the lens cap off, too. My daughter coined the 72 shot roll as the 72 exposure challenge. I’d love for that to become a community-driven trend, where people post their best frames from their 72 exposure “roll” on social media, with the hashtag #72exposurechallenge.
It would be nice if you could use the various Filters in this mode, and not just the Film Simulations. ***Edit: I was on a pre-production firmware; however, after updating to the latest version, I can now use Filters in the Film Camera Mode. Yea! Sorry for the confusion.*** Another thing I’d appreciate is that whatever ISO you have selected is carried over to the Film Camera Mode. Unfortunately, you only get Auto ISO up to ISO 12800, which is totally unusable whenever it goes that high. Fortunately, your Grain and White Balance settings are carried over, so be sure to set those before starting.
Above: X half contact sheet and various frames
Once you develop your “roll” in the app, you get a contact sheet. It would be great if you could long-press on a frame, and it would give you the option of saving that frame with the sprockets, or that frame plus the one next to it (on either side, unless it’s the end of the strip), or the whole strip. Instead, you have to crop the contact sheet in order to accomplish that. But I’m a huge fan of the contact sheet in-general, it’s a really cool idea.
Overall, I enjoyed using the Film Camera Mode, but I found myself not using it as much as the regular shooting mode because you have to be in the mood for it. One of the challenges that I appreciate about the X-HF1 is finding the “right” Film Simulation or Filter, combined with the “best” White Balance, to convey the mood of the scene most appropriately. The X half is so simple that a three-year-old could use it, but to get the most out of it requires thinking a little more deeply about things that are easily taken for granted. It’s been one of the most simple yet most challenging cameras I’ve ever used—the paradox I mentioned in the opening sentence.
Fujifilm X half – Acros Film Simulation
The X half is capable of recording video, but it’s very mediocre. Someone will use it creatively just to prove the point that it can be done, but I think Fujifilm probably should have just left off video, which would have made an interesting statement. Or else, maybe do a faux 8mm thing with sprockets and light leaks and such—that would have been really cool. Food for thought for the next iteration, if there is one someday.
Who should consider buying this camera? I think there are a few obvious answers. First, the X-HF1 has a foot in both the X-series and the Instax world. For those unaware, Instax is bigger than X and GFX combined. I talked to a bunch of people—probably close to ten—who own an Instax camera yet don’t own any X-series model, and they were all highly interested in the X half. Six different people told me that it’s the only Fujifilm camera they want, aside from Instax. The X half is an obvious bridge into the X-series for these folks. Also, some people who shoot point-and-shoot film cameras but are tired of the cost of film will find this to be an intriguing option. At $25 to $50+ per roll (including development and scanning), it won’t take long for the X half to pay for itself. The X-HF1 is sort of like a digital 110 camera, and almost lomography-esque, so it’s not difficult to see the appeal. Third, digicams are all the rage right now among younger people, and this camera can be considered in that category, too.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
What about current X-series photographers? What about someone like me? The camera is a blast. It’s so much fun. But it’s a toy. It’s not a serious camera for serious photography (I’m sure someone will use it in a serious way just to prove the point that it can be). It’s great for casual snapshots. I used it extensively during nearly three weeks of travel, and it was my most-used camera during that time, even more than my Fujifilm X100VI. I have so many more pictures that I could share, this is only a small sampling. It’s so easy to always have on you, and I would rather use the X half than my iPhone, if only for the tactile experience and Fujifilm colors. If you think you’d enjoy it, it’s probably worthwhile to get. If you wonder why anyone would buy it, it’s probably not for you, and it’s easy to move on.
The biggest criticism is going to be the price. In America, the X half is a steep $850. Across the rest of the world, it’s roughly equivalent to $700 USD. Unfortunately, this was the first camera to include the new tariffs in the price (although Canon and Nikon have just implemented some price increases, and Sony will soon, too), so it’s a bit shocking. Some people will say it should be $200 or $300, and that’s highly unrealistic—just absurd and not even close to any level of reality. Some will say it should be $500, and I’d agree with that if it were pre-Covid; however, there’s been a lot of inflation since then. I believe that $650 to $700 is a fair price. $850 is a little much, but that’s largely not Fujifilm’s fault; hopefully the tariff situation will get resolved soon, and Fujifilm can drop the price to where it should be. I don’t know if that will happen, though, and if the camera sells really well at its current price, there may not be a reason to reduce it.
Above: Various diptych pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
The last thing that I want to address is the inability to use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera. Recipes are a pretty big thing in the Fujifilm world—the brand-new X-E5 actually uses the word “Recipe” in the camera menu. I appreciate excellent straight-out-of-camera results. While I would love to be able to customize the looks more in the X half, you can still get good picture aesthetics with the limited tools available in the camera. The photography continuum has been leaning towards less editing for a few years now, and this camera is just a natural and seemingly inevitable expression of that.
There’s a lot to like about the Fujifilm X half, and a lot that can be questioned. You have to accept the camera for what it is and forgive it for not being what it’s not; otherwise, it might grind on your nerves. But, for certain, the camera is very enjoyable, and it offers a unique shooting experience not found anywhere else. If you want the X half experience, you have to have an X half. But that unique experience will not appeal to everyone, and maybe not even to most X-series photographers. I do believe this camera will be quite successful, and will bring many people into the X-series fold, mainly from groups that the camera industry has largely ignored. This will be the first X-series camera for a number of people, and someday some of those people will upgrade to a more premium model, perhaps an X-M5, X-E5, or X100VI. I think all of that is very good. It’s quite obvious to me that the Fujifilm X-HF1 will be a trendy camera, especially among younger photographers, and you’re soon going to see X half pictures all over TikTok and Instagram.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
One of Fujifilm’s most beloved lines is the X-E series. While never the most popular, X-E cameras have a passionate cult-like following. My first Fujifilm camera was an X-E1, so I have a special place in my heart for the line. The X-E4 is currently my favorite for travel photography, especially when paired with pancake lenses. At this time, Fujifilm doesn’t offer an X-E camera—the last one was the X-E4, but it was discontinued over two years ago.
The X-E1, which was announced in the fall of 2012, was a striking camera that caught a lot of people’s attention with its retro styling and compact design; however, there were some initial issues (later rectified via firmware updates) that hindered the perception of it. One year later, Fujifilm released the X-E2, which had a new sensor and was largely free of the problems that had given its predecessor bad press. This was a successful model for Fujifilm, but the X-series was still pretty new, with a small (but quickly growing) market share. The X-E2s was released three years later; it was almost just a firmware update disguised as a new camera, and Fujifilm later gave that same firmware to the X-E2. A lot of people consider the X-E2 and the X-E2s (which had a pretty short run) to be the same camera, because they basically are (although not 100%). In the fall of 2017, Fujifilm announced the X-E3, at a time when the X-series seemed to be hitting its stride, with several commercially successful models coming before (X-Pro2, X100F, X-T2, X-T20). I think there were some high sales expectations for the X-E3; however, demand turned out to be sluggish, and the camera had to be discounted in order to move the inventory. Because it was considered a bit of a “flop” (too many copies were manufactured for the actual demand), there were some rumblings that the X-E3 might be the last model in that series. Thankfully it wasn’t.
White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe
In March of 2021, Fujifilm released the X-E4. I preordered my copy the moment it was announced; if I hadn’t, I might not own one today. Fujifilm used the sales figures of the X-E3 to estimate the demand for its successor, which was a fair assumption, but what they didn’t know is that the X100V was about to go viral, and it was going to take the X-E4 with it. Demand for the X-E4 turned out to be much greater than it had been for the X-E3; however, as luck would have it, this was during the Covid global parts shortage, and Fujifilm had trouble securing materials to manufacture more copies. Two years after it was released, and with a very long backorder list, the camera was discontinued.
Because there was so much unfulfilled demand, the second-hand market for the X-E4 went nuts. It was pretty common to find a used X-E4 selling for 50% more than the MSRP of a new model, and sometimes double. Crazy! If sales had been slow, it very well might have been the final nail in the X-E coffin; however, sales were good, except that Fujifilm discontinued the camera at the peak of its popularity because they ran out of parts. Now, a little over two years later, apparently a new model is forthcoming. Interestingly, in 2023 I predicted that the X-E5 might come in the spring of 2025… not a bad guess, only slightly off. Let me quickly discuss what I hope for with the X-E5.
Beach Chairs – Folly Beach, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Velvia Film
A lot of people wanted to buy the X-E4 but just couldn’t find one in stock, so I wouldn’t change much. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. There are five things I would do different, and otherwise I’d leave it alone. I don’t think Fujifilm needs to reinvent the wheel here.
The five things that I would change, which would make the X-E5 pretty much perfect in my eyes, are simple: use the Shutter/ISO combo dial of the X100/X-Pro series, include an M/C/S switch, include a rear command dial, improve the EVF resolution, and use the X-Processor 5. That’s it. Keep the design the same, keep the sensor the same, use the same battery—keep almost all of it the same. Do this, and it will be a very successful camera.
Some people will demand IBIS and claim that the X-E5 must have it or the camera’s a dud. I don’t care if it does or doesn’t have IBIS, I’m fine either way. For still photography, IBIS is nice, but is oftentimes very overstated. It’s not a critical feature whatsoever for most people and circumstances. It does add weight (and probably size), cost, and battery life—in other words, there are tradeoffs. I’m ok with either choice, but I definitely lean towards its exclusion.
Will it have a small grip like the X-E3? It could, but if it doesn’t have IBIS, it’s lightweight enough that the omission is not a problem (it’s not a problem on the X-E4); personally, I’d welcome it for times when a larger lens is attached to the camera. They could include a built-in flash (the X-E1 and X-E2 had a flash), but it doesn’t bother me even slightly that the X-E4 doesn’t have one. I’d be a little surprised if the X-E5 has the 40mp X-Trans V sensor, but it certainly could. I’m more inclined to believe that it will have the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor like the X-S20 and X-M5, if for no other reason than to keep the cost down. The Film Dial? I like it personally, and I’d be curious to see how it might be implemented, but it doesn’t seem like an easy addition (the EVF is in the way), so I’m guessing no, the camera won’t have it.
One final point I’d like to make in this article is in regards to timing. The X-E1 was the second-to-last X-Trans I camera (X-M1 was last), the X-E2s was the second-to-last X-Trans II camera (X70 was last), the X-E3 was the second-to-last X-Trans III camera (X-H1 was last), and the X-E4 was the second-to-last X-Processor 4 model (X-T30 II was last). Fujifilm has used the X-E series to mark the sunset of each generation, with one camera model to follow. It’s reasonable to assume that we’re nearing the end of the fifth-generation. My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall, and the X-Pro4 (maybe called X-Pro5), which will be the first sixth-generation camera, will be announced in January or February of 2026. I’ve guessed wrong many times before, so take this with a massive grain of salt.
Tree of Broken Glass – North Salt Lake, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
Ever since I first saw the Fujifilm X100, X-Pro1, and X-E1 in 2011 and 2012, I wanted to buy one. These cameras were significantly different from the other digital models on the market, and seemingly more similar to classic film cameras. I’d see them in various camera magazines, and I’d eagerly read the reviews and study the pictures. I was fairly new to digital photography, having purchased my first DSLR in 2009, but I found the experience frustrating and disappointing. It was so much different than film, and I felt like I was learning photography all over again.
I had been a stubborn digital holdout for a decade, choosing film because I disliked digital. I would brag that I could easily distinguish a digital image from a film photo. But digital technology quickly advanced, becoming better and better. I knew that I needed to get onboard the train before getting completely left behind at the station. Because I had a couple of 35mm Pentax bodies, and you could use K-Mount lenses on Pentax DSLRs, I initially went with that brand. I have absolutely nothing against Pentax (I own a couple of Ricoh GR cameras), but it just wasn’t a good fit for me.
Barn by the Tetons – Grand Teton NP, WY – Fujifilm X-E1
Unfortunately, at the time that the original Fujifilm X-series cameras were released, I could not afford them. They were outside of my budget. Oh, if I just had a few hundred dollars more to spend on a camera, I’d buy one, I would tell myself. However, Fujifilm was just out of reach.
Time went on, and I jumped from brand-to-brand-to-brand, never satisfied with my gear. I thought maybe I was just being discontented, and I should try harder to find gratification with what I had. But contentment seemed illusive. After a number of years, I sold all of my digital gear except for one point-and-shoot digicam and my cellphone (I still had a couple of film cameras), and—for the most part—took a break from photography. Well, that break was short-lived, because I moved to Utah, which is a photographer’s playground, and I couldn’t resist the urge to create photographs.
Bison In The Road – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-E1
This time, I was determined to buy a Fujifilm camera. I had never owned one, and didn’t really know what to expect, but I knew they were different. I couldn’t afford the current offerings, so I purchased a used Fujifilm X-E1, which was now a four-year-old model. The X-Pro2 was brand-new, and I would have loved to buy it, but it was not anywhere near my budget. The current X-E model was the X-E2s, and that was also unattainable for me at the time. Happily, I found an X-E1 that I could afford, so I bought it. The manual controls felt natural and made so much sense to me. I was reminded of why I loved photography. It was instantly clear to me that Fujifilm cameras were what I had been looking for all along.
The purchase of that X-E1 sent me on a path that I’m still on today, and it’s been an incredible journey! To say that it changed my life is a massive understatement, no hyperbole. Although it wasn’t a brand-new camera, I loved it. I have a special place in my heart for the X-E1, and all of the other X-E models, including my Fujifilm X-E4, which is one of my favorite cameras today. I find it sad that Fujifilm is not currently making any X-E bodies (the X-E4 was discontinued two years ago), but I’m hopeful that the series will continue on, and the next iteration isn’t too far out.
Fujifilm recently released the GFX100RF; while the press has been largely positive, there have been a lot of criticisms in the comments section of articles and in forums. The complaints mostly revolve around two things: the lack of IBIS, and a maximum aperture of only f/4. What should Fujifilm do about this?
It’s important to understand that the Fujifilm GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo ever made. It’s the most affordable (aside from used) and portable option for digital medium-format photography. That was Fujifilm’s goal for this model, and they achieved it quite fantastically. With that in mind, all of the positive press is easily understood. So what accounts for all the negative comments? I believe there are a few possible explanations.
First, the GFX system is niche, and is not for everyone. Most photographers don’t need it, but some do, and some who don’t “need” it enjoy GFX anyway; however, it’s not mainstream, and likely never will be. Because the initial expectations were that the GFX100RF was a medium-format X100VI, people thought this was going to be a camera for the masses. It’s not. It’s a niche camera in a niche system. While it might offer the best way to dip your toes into GFX before deciding whether or not to take the plunge, it is not a camera that most will appreciate. It will never sell nearly as many copies as the X100VI (although it could become the best-selling GFX model). Perhaps the comparisons to the X-series camera created some unrealistic expectations. Even though there are some similarities to the X100VI and even the X70, this camera is definitely divergent from both, and those comparisons should be taken with a grain of salt. If the new camera was literally a medium-format X100VI, it would be a lot different, including bulkier and more expensive. Some might want that, but this camera is not a medium-format X100-series model. It should be appreciated for what it is (smallest, lightest, cheapest), and not criticized for not being what it was never intended to be (a medium-format X100VI).
Second, I think most of the complaints are from those who have little or no experience with medium-format cameras, and have unrealistic understandings of the norms and physics of the format. Literally, there are some who have said they’d never buy the camera unless it had an f/1.7 lens. Yeah, Fujifilm could do that, but it would be so large, heavy, and expensive, I doubt anyone would buy. My guess is that the majority of those criticizing the camera were never going to buy it, but were always going to find an excuse to pass. Interestingly, the closest medium-format camera-lens combo in size and weight is the Hasselblad 907X (plus CFV 100C back) with the 28mm f/4 lens—which also lacks IBIS, has an f/4 maximum aperture, and costs nearly twice as much as the GFX100RF.
Which brings me to third: trolls. The internet is full of them, and the Fujifilm community is no exception. In fact, I’d say that the number of trolls lurking around Fujifilm content has dramatically increased over the last couple of years. It doesn’t help that one troll can have many accounts, and use a variety of personas. You might see a whole thread conversion, and not realize that it’s just one person talking to themselves using multiple names. It makes them appear to hold a popular opinion, but in reality most disagree. If you are an internet troll, you quite literally need professional help, and I urge you to seek out the mental health help you obviously desperately need. Interestingly, when you meet photographers in-person, you realize that trolls don’t exist in real life, they’re only on the internet. I met hundreds and hundreds of photographers over the last year, and can attest that none of them are trolls. But go to the comments section of most photography sites (thankfully, not this one), and probably anywhere from a quarter to a half of the comments are from trolls. I’d encourage content creators to crack down on internet trolls—if you don’t put up with them, they tend to go away, which makes the experience better for the real people who want to enjoy your website.
Now, this is what I propose to Fujifilm: make an actual medium-format X100VI. Call it the GFX100RF-XL. Give it a 45mm f/2 lens, or, if that’s just an impossible maximum aperture (which it probably is), go with f/2.8. Give it IBIS and an optical viewfinder (maybe like what’s in the X-Pro2). Yes, the body might need to be 25% or even 50% bigger. The lens would likely be 150% or 200% larger, maybe more. It might weigh twice as much as the GFX100RF. It’ll probably cost three thousand dollars more. But there are a lot of people who claim to want this, so give it to them. Let them have the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. If it’s a big success, then they’ll have proven their criticisms both valid and valuable. Win-win. If the camera struggles to sell well, then Fujifilm knows to ignore those people in the future (so you better pony up if Fujifilm does this!).
I do think it’s worth exploring if the demand is actually real—I believe that some of it is real. There are people who would be all over a medium-format X100VI, despite the size, weight, and cost increase. It would be a dream-come-true for them. Why not find out just how many there are? If money was no object to me, I’d happily own both a GFX100RF and a GFX100RF-XL. At the very least, this camera would grab headlines, and bring attention to the brand. Most likely it won’t sell as many copies as the GFX100RF, but it would likely sell well enough to justify its existence, and become a legendary model in time, if not right away.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Makoto told PetaPixel, “[O]ur first priority was how to make it smaller and lighter weight.” That’s pretty much the entirety of the article, as the rest is simply explaining why the camera does not have IBIS or a larger maximum aperture than f/4 and other design choices. It’s worth reading, if you are curious about those things. The main point: Fujifilm set out to make it as small and lightweight as possible. Interestingly, they did create mockups of versions with IBIS and larger apertures, but it required the camera to be significantly larger and heavier, which went against their “first priority” of small size and less weight. IBIS alone, according to this interview, would have doubled the camera’s size, because the lens would have to project to a much larger area.
The lens is pretty remarkable in that it is extremely compact for medium-format, and it barely covers the sensor. That’s why IBIS wasn’t practical, as it would have required a different and much larger lens. That’s why the maximum aperture is “only” f/4, as a larger aperture would not only have required a larger lens, but it would likely begin to show vignetting and corner softness when wide open. All of the design choices make sense when viewed through the prism of Fujifilm’s top priority: size and weight. The engineers succeeded, and did so quite fantastically.
Now you might disagree with the “first priority” that Fujifilm gave the GFX100RF team. You might not appreciate that the GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo that has ever been made. You might have wished that Fujifilm’s top goal was to make this as premium of a camera as possible, or balanced somewhere in-between premium and size/weight/cost. I think that’s where a lot of the criticisms are found. There are some (quite) vocal critics who disagree with the design ethos, and wished that this camera was different.
This is where the second PetaPixel article comes in. Interestingly, interchangeable-lens camera sales are declining year-over-year, while fixed-lens camera sales are increasing because of a renewed interest in compact cameras. Who is leading the fixed-lens camera market? Kodak. Surprised? It’s JK Imaging selling cheap point-and-shoots on Amazon under the Kodak PixPro name—cameras that are basically 15-year-old tech digicams. Second is Fujifilm, thanks to the massive success of the X100VI, which has already outsold all of the previous X100-series models, and also the Instax Evo line. Canon is third—largely because of their nine-year-old (but still in production) ELPH 360 digicam—but declining (the PowerShot V1 will certainly change that trajectory to some degree). Kenko Tokina is fourth with their tiny toy cameras and digicams. Panasonic is fifth and on the rise, due to the sales success of the DC-ZS99. Ricoh is sixth, thanks to the GR III and GR IIIx, and would probably rank higher if they manufactured those cameras at a higher rate to meet the current demand. Most of the fixed-lens cameras that are selling like hotcakes right now are cheap point-and-shoots; the exceptions are the Fujifilm X100VI and Ricoh GR III/GR IIIx.
If you are trying to understand why Fujifilm chose to make size, weight, and cost the priority for the GFX100RF, that’s why. Simply, it’s market trends. By making the camera as small, lightweight, and affordable as possible, Fujifilm gave it the best chance for market success. The early indicators seem to show that it was the best choice, but only time will tell. That’s not going to make those who wish that Fujifilm had made other aspects—like stabilization and maximum aperture—more important feel any better, but I hope it sheds some light on the why, even if you disagree.
With the massive success of the X100VI, if sales figures for the GFX100RF are good, and if Fujifilm were to release some other fixed-lens option (say, the half-frame camera that’s been rumored), it’s quite possible that Fujifilm will find itself at the very top of the fixed-lens market, which is a growing segment. But, I think it’s also quite possible that, as the months pass by, more and more fixed-lens cameras will be released by other manufacturers, heating up the competition, and making it more difficult to stay on top. Getting quality (and exciting) products out ahead of competitors is going to be a big long-term win for Fujifilm in my opinion; however, predicting the future is impossible, and I’ve certainly been wrong plenty of times before, so who knows? It does seem like smart moves to me, though. Overall, the GFX100RF is likely only going to be a small contributor to Fujifilm’s fixed-lens sales numbers (it’s a $4,900 camera, after all, and GFX models don’t move nearly as quickly as X-series), but it will probably do well for the company’s bottom line, which is good if you’d like to see them continue to make interesting cameras well into the future.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
While at the CP+ Show in Japan, PetaPixel interviewed Yuji Igarashi, who is the General Manager of the Professional Imaging Group, Imaging Solutions Division, of the Fujifilm Corporation. He said some interesting things regarding the Fujifilm X100VI production situation. Now, it’s important to take it with a grain of salt. Sometimes people will harshly judge an interpretation of what someone said in a different language, lacking grace for interpretation errors and dialect and cultural differences. Keeping that in mind, let’s get into it.
“We’ve more than doubled our production compared to the previous model,” Yuji Igarashi stated. “But on top of that, we are also still increasing production. Now we can produce higher than [15,000 units per month] and we have been, but it’s not like we can produce double that [amount again].”
Not much new there. Fujifilm told us from the outset that they had doubled production from the previous model, from 7,500 units per month to 15,000. We also already knew that for a year now they have been trying to increase production further. Fujifilm told PetaPixel that they have been unable to accomplish 30,000 units per month, but they are definitely beyond 15,000.
“We’ve been doing what we can to increase our production for the X100VI,” Yuji explained, “but the processes are quite complicated—especially for pieces like the top plate. To make these sharp edges, it goes through many processes. So, this type of camera is not so suited for ramping up production.” In other words, they’re doing all that they can, but there are significant challenges that prevent them from churning out even more cameras.
“In one year since we launched this product,” Yuji continued, “compared to the previous models which took us to sell three or four years, we’ve already shipped an equivalent amount.” This was shocking to me. Fujifilm is stating that—even with the manufacturing limitations—they have already built and delivered as many X100VI’s, which was released just one year ago, as the previous iteration over nearly a four year period. Just as many people have an X100VI in their hands as have an X100V, yet it only took Fujifilm one year to do that for the new camera vs four years for the X100V. And it’s a similar situation for the X100F and the previous versions.
This completely shreds the (quite stupid) theory that Fujifilm is purposefully creating shortages in order to manipulate the market. The unprecedented demand of the X100VI was and is real. No camera has been as in-demand as the X100VI ever. In all of history, no model from any brand received more preorders than the X100VI, it’s not even close. Despite building a ton of copies, Fujifilm has not yet met the initial demand, but they’re getting close. “So I know people are quite frustrated when they say it’s still not available,” Yuji said. “I think one issue is that the first-day orders were so big when it was announced, that’s why people say they’ve been waiting for eight, or 10 months, which we totally understand is so frustrating. So until we clear that, some people will still continue to say, ‘We’ve been waiting for 10 months.'”
Now you might say that the math isn’t mathing. If Fujifilm hasn’t been able to quadruple production, how could they possibly build as many units in one year as they did over nearly four? First, Fujifilm produced a bunch of copies in the months prior to the camera’s announcement, in anticipation of strong initial demand. Also, the X100V was effected by the pandemic parts shortage, which for a time limited the number of copies they could manufacture. If Fujifilm managed to make (say) 300,000 units, that would likely be close to the total number of X100V’s manufactured in total. And that 300K guesstimate might be in the ballpark. We know that 180,000 were manufactured at a minimum post launch, and 60,000 might have been manufactured prior to launch. If Fujifilm has been able to increase production by 6,000 units on average over the last 10 months, then you’d have 300K. While that’s a lot of cameras, apparently there were around 500,000 day-one preorders in China alone, so the initial demand has still not been met a whole year later.
Thankfully, slowly but surely Fujifilm is catching up. Here and there the X100VI has been seen in-stock at camera stores, particularly the black version. If you want to buy one, the wait isn’t nearly as long now. You might still have to be patient for a month or maybe a few, but the 10-month-long waits are in the past. It’s a good time to get your order in if you’ve been waiting. Or, if you’ve been hoping to find it at a local camera store, they might just have one right now—maybe.
The challenge for Fujifilm is to tread carefully on production numbers. If they suddenly find that the demand has been met, and they’re building over 20,000 units per month, they could end up overproducing a lot of copies. Since it takes months from the time parts are ordered until finished cameras are delivered, if the market suddenly shifts, it’s possible that Fujifilm could manufacture a hundred thousand copies more than are needed and can be sold. That amount of overproduction would be a tough blow to the bottom line, and possible could cripple the camera division. As wait times dwindle, Fujifilm should strongly considered reducing the number of units that they manufacture monthly. At some point, 15,000 copies each month will be much too much. Hopefully that is a long ways off, but it will arrive eventually, and it will need to be handled quite carefully when it approaches.
Above: Aurora Borealis captured in Central Park NYC on an iPhone 13 using the Vibrant Color filter in RitchieCam.
I’m very proud of my iPhone camera app, called RitchieCam. But this last weekend I broke it, and I’m very sorry about that. For some of you, the app stopped working a couple days ago. But now it’s fixed! Let me explain what happened and why.
When Apple introduced the iPhone 16 and iOS 18 a couple of months ago, they included some new features. I wanted to incorporate those into RitchieCam so that you could take advantage of them. Whenever Apple introduces something new, that doesn’t mean that it is easily implemented into third-party apps. Sometimes they exclude it from even being available, and in order to include it one must take unconventional and roundabout paths. The volume button as a shutter release is one example of that: it was only fairly recently that Apple officially supported it for third party apps like RitchieCam, and so (until they did) it was quite crazy the programming necessary to make it work. Some things have been figured out, and some things haven’t. RitchieCam has a very small team working on it in their spare time, yet we’ve been able to do a heck-of-a-lot, all things considered. There’s a lot more that we’d like to do, and are currently working on.
Thankfully and amazingly—and really because of Sahand Nayebaziz, who is an incredibly talented app developer—we were able to get most of the new iPhone 16 and iOS 18 features added to RitchieCam. We finished it up late last week, submitted to Apple for approval, and over the weekend it went live. I was really excited, but then reports began to come in: the app keeps crashing and is unusable. Yikes! I’m very appreciative of all those who reported the problem.
The issue was actually very small, but it was a matter of finding and correcting it. It was related to iOS 17—if you were on iOS 18, you didn’t experience any issues; if you were on iOS 17, simply updating the iOS would clear it up. Some people hadn’t done that yet, and also some people have older devices not capable of updating to iOS 18. Those are the folks who experienced the problem, which essentially rendered the app useless—I apologize for the problem and inconvenience. We figured out the issue, got a new update built, submitted it to Apple, and yesterday afternoon it was approved and made available. If RitchieCam isn’t working on your device, make sure to update it right now.
Above: Various photos captured on an iPhone 13 using the RitchieCam app.
We didn’t find the problem while beta testing because all of our iPhones were updated to iOS 18. There’s a simulator that allows you to test the app on various devices and iOS versions, and it had worked well on it with no problems—the simulator didn’t catch the crash. Once we found an iPhone with iOS 17 to test it on, the problem was immediate and obvious. Figuring out why and resolving it was another issue, but we got it done. It’s now fixed, and RitchieCam should be working just fine for you (if you’ve updated it).
For iOS 18, one cool new feature is launching RitchieCam directly from the Lock Screen. It’s easy to setup, and makes accessing the app much quicker. If you have an iPhone 16, you can use the new Camera Control Button for various functions, such as exposure adjustments. This isn’t a major update, but hopefully these new features will be helpful to some of you. I don’t use RitchieCam for serious work (although people do use their iPhones for such, so it’s certainly possible…), but it’s very convenient for casual images that most likely will be sent in a text or posted to social media. In particular, I like to use it for the 65:24 XPan aspect ratio (something Fujifilm should include in their 40mp X-series cameras). RitchieCam is available for free in the App Store; become a Patron to unlock all of the features and filters, and to support future development.
According to Fujirumors, Fujifilm is working on a new camera that will have a sensor size never before used by Fujifilm. I have no idea what that means, but I thought it might be fun to speculate what some of the possibilities are. Who knows if this is an X-series camera… it could be GFX. It could be a digicam or something like the XP80 waterproof camera. It could be Instax, since they have the EVO and PAL models. It could be something else entirely. For the sake of this article, I will assume that it is X-series; however, it very well might not be. I think this is one of those times where it’s best to keep expectations in check and not get your hopes up too high. Still, it can be fun to guess.
My very first thought is that it could be an X30-like successor—perhaps called X50—with a 1″ sensor. The Fujifilm X30 had a tiny 2/3″ 12mp X-Trans II sensor, but was still a good compact zoom, and is fun to use even in 2024. While a successor would need to be significantly different, I do believe that if it has a 1″ 20mp X-Trans V sensor, a 9mm to 37mm (24mm to 100mm full-frame-equivalent) f/2-4 zoom lens, IBIS, EVF, and retro tactile controls (no PASM, please), it will do quite well. There is a renewed interest in these types of cameras right now. Alternatively, a fixed-focal-length wide-angle option could be good, too.
Another idea would be to use the sensor found in the latest GoPro models. It has a tiny 1/1.9″ 27mp sensor with an unusual (almost square) 8:7 aspect ratio. The benefit of the unusual sensor shape is it allows for vertical videos without having to tilt the camera sideways, so obviously it would be a video-centric model, perhaps in the action camera realm. Most likely this would not technically be an X-series model, but it is possible that Fujifilm could use an X-Trans array. I don’t think this is a likely option, unless Fujifilm has thought of some way to stand out in what is already a crowded scene.
I doubt that Fujifilm has any interest in Micro-4/3. I think that MFT is too close to APS-C that they would only compete against themselves; aside from that, MFT is basically a declining market. Still, it is possible that an X100-like or X70-like compact fixed-lens MFT camera is in the works, I just see it as highly unlikely.
An intriguing option that I’ve suggested a couple of times (first in 2019, actually) is APS-H. There aren’t a lot of APS-H cameras anymore, but it used to be more common. Canon made some, as did Sigma. Since APS-H is about 15% larger than APS-C, not all APS-C lenses cover the entire frame. Sigma’s solution was to automatically crop to APS-C for the lenses without full coverage, and I would suggest that Fujifilm take the same approach. While some Fujifilm lenses will fully cover APS-H, some—the majority, actually—won’t; for those that don’t, the camera would automatically crop to APS-C.
The reason why Fujifilm might do this—and the camera that Fujifilm might do this for—is XPan on the future X-Pro4 (or maybe called X-Pro5). Where APS-C lenses struggle to cover APS-H are the corners, so the not-fully-covered lenses would be just fine for the XPan aspect-ratio, since the corners are cropped out. The roughly 50mp APS-H sensor would produce roughly 27mp XPan images. For lenses without full coverage with the 3:2 aspect ratio, you’d still get a 40mp APS-C photo; however, for the lenses with full coverage, you’d get the full 50mp-ish picture.
The only other option I can think of that makes sense is perhaps a full-frame X100-like camera. I don’t believe that Fujifilm has any interest in creating a new lens mount, so I would be completely shocked if Fujifilm made any interchangeable-lens full-frame models. Fujifilm would mostly be competing against themselves, and would undercut both their X and GFX lines; aside from that, the full-frame market is quite crowded and highly competitive. But, a premium fixed-lens full-frame camera might sell very well. Fujifilm would have to do something to differentiate it from the X100VI so that they aren’t directly competing against each other, and I have no doubts that they can.
If I were to bet on what it will be, my guess is none of these, that it’s not an X-series camera. If it is in the X-series, I think the top odds are that it is a 1″ sensor compact camera of some sort. An APS-H X-Pro with the XPan aspect ratio would be super cool, but unlikely in my opinion. With the massive demand for the X100VI, a full-frame version could be a huge sales success. Eventually we will know for sure, but for now we can only speculate, and most of those guesses will turn out to be wrong. Still, it’s fun to dream.
The Fujifilm X100VI is the most preordered camera in history by far. There were more orders placed prior to the release date than there were X100V’s produced in its entire four-year run. Completely unprecedented! I quickly made my order within minutes after it was announced, and I still had to wait over a month for it to arrive. There are people who placed their preorders on day-one who are still waiting, and some have been told that it might be closer to Christmas before it can be delivered. Even though Fujifilm is right now manufacturing the X100VI at somewhere around four-times the rate that they did the X100V, they still haven’t cleared out the preorder list, let alone begin to tackle the backorders placed after the release. It’s nuts! If you’ve been patiently waiting for yours, I hope that it arrives soon. If you haven’t already ordered yours, the wait could be quite significant.
Quite obviously before Fujifilm even thinks about offering alternative versions of the X100VI, they need to catch up on all the orders already placed. I have no idea how long that might take, but I highly doubt it will be anytime in 2024, and maybe not in 2025, either. However, once they’ve managed to get this situation under control—perhaps in the spring of 2026—I would encourage Fujifilm to consider producing variations of the X100VI. While this is something I’ve suggested for awhile (first with the X100F, actually), this is the first time that I’ve dedicated an entire article to the topic.
Leica just announced a 43mm f/2 version of the Q3, called Leica Q3 43. For those who don’t know, the Q3 has a 28mm f/1.7 lens, which is equivalent to 18.6mm on Fujifilm, the same focal-length as the X70. The new 43mm version has more of a standard field-of-view, and is equivalent on Fujifilm to 28.6mm (Fujifilm doesn’t offer that exact focal-length, but it is pretty close to both 27mm and 30mm, which Fujifilm does make).
Offering multiple focal-length versions of a fixed-lens camera is nothing new. For the Ricoh GR III, which has a 18.3mm (27.5mm full-frame-equivalent) lens, there’s a 26mm (39mm equivalent) variation called GR IIIx. Sigma had up to four versions of the DP cameras: 14mm (21mm equivalent), 19mm (28.5mm equivalent), 30mm (45mm equivalent), and 50mm (75mm equivalent). Fujifilm has never taken this approach, but I think they should.
What Fujifilm does offer are conversion lenses, which screw onto the end of the camera’s fixed lens. There’s a wide-angle (WCL-X100 II) and telephoto (TCL-X100 II) option. The wide conversion lens has a 0.8x magnification, which means that the 23mm (34.5mm equivalent) lens on the X100VI becomes 18.4mm (27.6mm equivalent). The telephoto conversion lens has a 1.4x magnification, which means that the 23mm lens on the X100VI becomes 32.2mm (48.3mm equivalent). Essentially, it’s like having three versions of the camera: 18mm, 23mm, and 32mm. The downside to the conversion lenses is that they add a fairly significant amount of size and weight (especially the telephoto) to the camera, which, to an extent, defeats the purpose of it. While the teleconverters do indeed add quite a bit of versatility, I would like to see one or two alternative focal-length versions in the future, where the dimensions and weight of the camera are about the same, just with different fields-of-view.
My top two recommendations would be a 16mm (24mm equivalent) f/2.8 version, and a 35mm (52.5mm equivalent) f/2 version. Obviously 18mm f/2 would be a popular choice, so I’m sure that would be high on their list of potential focal-lengths. Fujifilm has a pancake 27mm f/2.8, and modifying those optics for use with an X100 series camera could be intriguing. Fujifilm could offer just one variation (like Leica did with the Q3, and Ricoh did with the GR III), or they could offer multiple options (like Sigma did with the DP series). Personally, I’d like both a more wide-angle and a more telephoto version.
This should not be a priority for Fujifilm whatsoever, but something to consider for down the road. Maybe it could be announced in the fall of 2025 in time for the Christmas shopping season, or in spring of 2026, or sometime later. Or maybe they don’t see any reason to offer it at all, because perhaps they don’t believe it will gain any net camera sales, only take away X100VI sales. Personally, I would likely buy whatever alternative focal-length version(s) that they do release, if they ever do, to be an addition to my X100VI. I don’t know how many other people would do the same, but it might be worthwhile for them to consider.
I don’t see Fujifilm going down this path in the near future. They may have no interest in doing it ever. But I like the idea, personally, and would encourage them to at least consider the possibility. Not everyone appreciates the 23mm (34.5mm equivalent) focal-length of the X100-series cameras, and even if they do, they may want a little variety sometimes. While I believe that it would do quite well for Fujifilm, obviously it is something that they themselves must believe in order for it to ever happen. I hope that someday it does.
In this article we’re going to discuss Fujifilm’s X-series Autofocus, which is a hot topic right now. A lot of things are being said about it on YouTube and social media and especially in the comments section of photography websites. I’m a little afraid to give my two cents, because I know it will not be well received by some of you reading this. I think most regular visitors of this website will not have any qualms about it, but no doubt this will be shared on Reddit or DPReview or a Facebook group or someplace like that, and I will receive some aggressive disagreements by some of those folks.
I cannot tell you how many times I’ve seen people online call Fujifilm’s Autofocus “garbage” or “bad” or some other negative term. Every once in awhile a person will comment on Fuji X Weekly with a similar sentiment; however, it’s vocalized a lot less here than elsewhere, it seems. This is a controversy that I’ve tried to steer clear of—people have strong opinions about this topic, and my opinions are different than many. I did write about it two months ago, but I think it needs to be addressed again.
As I’ve pondered this topic, I think there are a number of issues that are often lumped together, but need to be discussed individually. They are related in that it affects Autofocus, but otherwise they are unrelated, and lumping them together doesn’t help bring about any solutions. We’ll get to it all, but it will take some time to navigate through it. Be patient, as this will be a journey.
First and foremost, I believe that much of the negativity is a type of hysteria. Someone points out a “problem” and now everyone (it seems) is experiencing it. Echo chambers and groupthink on the internet can make people especially susceptible to this. I’m not a psychologist and offer no professional medical advice, but I did listen to a podcast recently on a flight that made me consider this as a strong possibility.
The podcast was Cautionary Tales with Tim Harford and the episode was entitled Sonic Poison? The Genesis of Havana Syndrome. It explains how hysteria can have a real affect on people, such as causing nuns to meow, or children to experience sickness that they don’t really have, or millions of dollars of perfectly good Coca-Cola dumped down the drain for no good reason, or spies “poisoned” by loud cicadas in Cuba. While these things were in their heads, they manifested in real physical ways.
What clued me in to the potential that this phenomena might also be happening to those who own Fujifilm cameras is when someone told me that they were really upset at Fujifilm because their Autofocus was not working as it should be and that Fujifilm needed to fix the problem right now; this person admitted that they had never experienced the issue personally, but they knew it was a problem because they had seen it in a YouTube video. Later, another person stated to me something very similar: while the “problem” had had no affect on their photography, they were aware of its existence because they had seen it on the internet—and they were demanding that Fujifilm fix it ASAP or else they would quit the brand.
I’m not suggesting that Fujifilm’s Autofocus woes are “all in your head” and that it is just psychological, but I do believe it explains a good deal of it. I think if some certain YouTube videos had never been published (and it’s fine that they were, I’m not condemning them, I’m just observing), there would not be nearly so much discussion and outrage right now. A lot of people “became aware” of a problem that they likely would not have noticed on their own otherwise, and it wouldn’t have affected them in any real way (in other words, it wouldn’t have been an issue at all). When you spend a lot of money on something, and especially if your livelihood (or hopes of a future livelihood) depends on that thing, and you believe that it is not working right, it’s easy to understand why there would be some hysteria. Nuns meowing, Coke getting dumped, and Fujifilm’s “sucky” Autofocus are related, if you ask me, and it’s something that we can all be susceptible to. But, again, I’m not a psychologist and offer no professional advice on this.
While I believe a significant amount of the outrage can be attributed to that hysteria, there are real issues that should be discussed rationally. Something that I find interesting is that for the first five or six years of this blog, Fujifilm’s Autofocus was not a big issue whatsoever. It wasn’t a hot topic. What changed? I think it was Fujifilm’s enticement of Canikony brand photographers. I think many of the complaints are by people who used to shoot Canikony brand cameras—particularly Canon and Sony—and when they switched to Fujifilm over the last couple of years, they were disappointed by Fujifilm’s Autofocus system. It’s not as good as those found on Canikony models, especially Canon and Sony.
There are three reasons why Canikony cameras have better Autofocus than Fujifilm. First, they’ve been doing it for much longer. Sony (through Konica and Minolta) have been making Autofocus cameras since the 1970’s, and had what was considered the first “good” AF system (not good compared to what we have today, but good for back then) with the Minolta Maxxum in the mid-1980’s; Canon and Nikon both introduced their first Autofocus cameras in the 1980’s. Second, Canikony brands have had significantly more R&D money to invest in their Autofocus systems. Finally, as PetaPixel pointed out, the Canikony brands over the last handful of years have spent very little effort on image quality improvements, while placing much of their efforts on Autofocus improvements, and in some specific cases, actually to the detriment of image quality (a path that I do not want Fujifilm to pursue, personally). Most of the Canikony cameras that Fujifilm models are often compared to are also significantly more expensive, and usually larger and heavier.
Anyone who expects Fujifilm’s Autofocus to be at the same level as the Canikony brands have not put much thought into it. Still, it’s surprising to me, considering the disadvantages that Fujifilm has faced, that they’re not very far behind, either. Fujifilm’s Autofocus is by far more than good enough for most people and situations, including for the many professional photographers who use these cameras each day even under difficult circumstances. In preparation for this article, I reached out to five highly talented and successful photographers/videographers who use Fujifilm—people I met in person this year while traveling across America—and asked if they find Fujifilm’s Autofocus “lacking” or “detrimental” to their work. All five answered no; one added a caveat that for a specific use-case this person prefers their Sony model—they could do it with their Fujifilm, but it’s a little easier on their Sony, so for that particular situation this person doesn’t use Fujifilm.
Photography has been around for a very long time. It didn’t begin two, five, or ten years ago. People have been capturing amazing photographs for well over 100 years. If you were to grab a Fujifilm X-T5, jump into a DeLorean, and travel back in time just 20 years, you’d blow away the photographers of that era with what would seem like to them impossible camera technology. Yet the photographs captured today are no more impressive than than they were then. Camera gear has advanced tremendously over the last two decades, but the great photographs from today are no more great than they were 30, 40, 50, etc., etc., years ago. I love finding vintage photography magazines and admiring the incredible photographs captured on significantly inferior gear than what we have readily available today—we’re so spoiled!
In other words, if they could do it on their lesser gear, you can do it on your greater gear. No excuses. Fujifilm’s Autofocus is really good, especially compared to what existed over the last handful of decades. No, not quite as good as the Canikony brands are right now, but really good nonetheless. The negativity just never made sense to me. It’s like complaining that a Corvette isn’t a Maserati, and calling the Corvette garbage because it isn’t more like a Maserati. If you want a Maserati, buy a Maserati! Otherwise, appreciate that you have a Corvette.
Many years ago I was given this advice: Either you are controlling your camera, or your camera is controlling you. I think that a lot of people allow their cameras to control them, which might typically work out fine because the current tech is so advanced, but, when it doesn’t work out, it’s an easy scapegoat to blame the gear instead of looking inward. Without self reflection, you are robbing yourself of the opportunity to learn and grow. Your gear is only a limitation if you allow it to be, and if you don’t allow it, then it’s no issue whatsoever. That might require learning some new skills or sharpening some skills that you already have but could be improved upon.
A lot of people don’t like that advice, but it is completely true. You have it within you to not allow any limitations on any gear get in the way of creating whatever it is that you want to create. The difference between those that are having a ton of success with their Fujifilm gear and those complaining about it saying they can’t is the person holding the camera, and not the camera itself. I get it: it’s much easier to blame the gear. But, if you blame the gear instead of yourself, your camera is controlling you, and you will not improve—that success will be elusive.
All that I just said is the most important part of this article. You might disagree, and that’s ok. Sometimes the truth hurts. It might be a bitter pill that you were not ready to swallow. I didn’t say anything that’s not true; perhaps it is deserving of a second read-through, and with an open mind. With all that said, there are some other things that are important to address.
I think a good deal of the negative attention regarding Fujifilm’s Autofocus issues came after Fujifilm released a firmware update earlier this year with an Autofocus bug. I didn’t experience the issue caused by that firmware personally because I always wait awhile to update the firmware. This is a good idea regardless of camera brand. Sometimes there are bugs, and sometimes the bugs are significant. If you wait a week or two, if there is some major bug, it should be well known by then—if so, just skip that firmware and wait for the next one. Fujifilm did fix that Autofocus bug; however, to a much smaller degree there is still some AF problem that seems to only affect certain use cases. It’s my understanding that Fujifilm is aware of it and working on a solution. It will get resolved, just give it a little time.
As Fujifilm has grown, I think one department that may not have upscaled enough is the one that is in charge of firmware. Perhaps Fujifilm needs to add a couple more to the team, or maybe they have already and are experiencing some growing pains as new folks are brought in (or combination of the two). From my perspective, it just seems that this team is stretched a little too thin and needs more resources to allow them to keep up. My advice to Fujifilm is simply to invest more in the team that is in charge of firmware, as I’m certain it will pay off in the long run. A lot of negative attention today could have been avoided had this team been given all of the necessary resources a couple years back.
The remaining Autofocus woes are related to hardware and settings. It could be that you are not using the best lenses, or don’t have your camera settings programmed optimally.
Fujifilm’s older lenses are slower. The newer options with a Linear Motor (designated with “LM” in the lens name) are often the fastest. The larger and heavier the glass elements, the slower the AF will likely be. In other words, there’s a pretty significant performance difference depending on the lens that you have on your camera. Use the right lenses and you’ll have more success; however, for most people and circumstances, all of the lenses are plenty good enough—this is more for those who demand peak performance for their situation. Also, ensure that the lens firmware is up-to-date, not just the camera—this might resolve it for you, so it is worth looking into.
Fujifilm cameras have a lot of customizable fine-tuning options for Autofocus (especially on the newer models); if those settings are optimized for your situation, you will have much success, but if not, you may have more “misses” than you’d like. There are resources online that can help you find the right AF settings for you—it’s a very individual type of thing, so what works for one person may not for another; I recommend that you look for advice from multiple sources, and experiment—try different settings and see what happens. Also, I have found that several complaints were resolved with one specific thing: Release/Focus Priority should be set to Focus and not Release. I have a feeling that this one setting is the root of many people’s AF woes.
Political Skateboarder – Nashville, TN – Fujifilm X-T50 – Kodak Film Recipes
In my opinion, Fujifilm’s Autofocus problems have been significantly overblown—Mount Everest has been made out of an ant hill. The internet has spread hysteria. Some people have unrealistic expectations. For others its user-error, and could be resolved with a little effort. Blaming the camera is easy to do, but it stifles your growth. Control your camera, don’t let it control you. Many people have the same exact gear as you do and they do not experience your issues. It’s not the camera—it has never been the camera, and it never will be the camera. Your gear is much more than capable. As Ansel Adams stated, “The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it.” You have it within you to not allow it to adversely affect you, but it might require some practice or learning new skills. That’s not a message that people usually want to hear, but it’s one that needs to be said. If you require optimized peak Autofocus performance, make sure that you are using the right lenses and have the best settings selected for your situation. For Fujifilm: provide more resources to the firmware team so that they can ensure they are not producing buggy updates (by the way, this is not an issue unique to Fujifilm by any stretch).
Please keep your comments civil. I know that chronic complainers, haters, and trolls will come out of the woodworks when an article like this is published. Unlike most websites, I don’t put up with that here. If you disagree, please be kind in your disagreement. I feel like this article needs to be published to counteract all the negativity that is much too prevalent across the internet. My hope is that—if you have experienced issues with Fujifilm’s Autofocus—you’ll be encouraged to create amazing content with the gear you own, because your camera is, in fact, more than capable just so long as the one using it is also capable (and you can be!). Excuses get in the way, but you don’t have to let them. That’s the message of this article.
I get asked occasionally which Fujifilm cameras are the very best. Sometimes people want to jump into the Fujifilm system, but are unaware of which camera to buy; however, they know that they want the “best” model, whichever one that is. Of course, best is highly subjective—what is “best” for one person may not be for another. My list might look a lot different from another’s. This is simply my opinion as a long-time experienced Fujifilm photographer, so take it for what it’s worth, which might only be two pennies.
My list of Fujifilm’s seven best cameras is limited to X-series models. I’m not including GFX, Instax, Fujica, or anything else. I’m only discussing the APS-C line that Fujifilm introduced with the fixed-lens X100 in 2011, and the interchangeable-lens X-Pro1 in 2012. Those cameras and the ones introduced afterwards are the models being considered for this list.
Without any further delay, let’s get started!
#7: Fujifilm X70
The Fujifilm X70 is a fixed-lens X-Trans II camera that was released in 2016. It had a short sales-life because Sony suddenly discontinued production of the 16mp APS-C sensor that the camera used, and by the end of that year the X70 was discontinued, and out-of-stock shortly thereafter. As a compact camera with an 18.5mm (28mm full-frame-equivalent) lens, it competed directly with the Ricoh GR II. I like the X70 better than the GR II because it has the traditional tactile controls that Fujifilm is known for, while the GR cameras utilize PASM.
Today, at eight-years-old, the camera often sells for more than when it was brand-new. It’s much beloved by many who own one. Some proclaim it to be their favorite Fujifilm camera of all time. Compared to the latest models, the X70 is less advanced and with fewer options, but it does what few Fujifilm cameras can: fit into your pocket. In my opinion, it’s the best carry-everywhere camera ever made by Fujifilm. A successor—an X80—should be a high priority for Fuji.
#6: Fujifilm X-Pro2
While all three of the X-Pro cameras are great, there’s something especially special about the Fujifilm X-Pro2. It’s the seemingly perfect balance of form and function. It’s one of those cameras that will be desired and used for many years to come. While other digital cameras of its era will be long forgotten, I’m convinced that the X-Pro2 will still be sought out even when it’s 20 years old or older.
Introduced at the same time as the X70, the Fujifilm X-Pro2 is an X-Trans III model, and as such it doesn’t seem quite as dated as the X70. It still holds up fairly well in ability and features compared to the latest models. I would be perfectly happy if it were my only camera; unfortunately, I let it get away from me twice.
#5: Fujifilm X-E4
The X-E4 is the smallest and most minimalistic of Fujifilm’s modern offerings. While it is not perfect (no camera is), it does offer a slightly unique experience for Fujifilm that some like and some don’t. Personally, I appreciate the camera—it is one of my favorite Fujifilm models—and I find it especially great for travel or just everyday walk-around photography, thanks to its compactness. I have more expensive cameras, but often choose the X-E4 instead.
While the Fujifilm X-E4 doesn’t have IBIS or 40mp or the newest couple of film simulations, it is one of the last X-Trans IV models, and as such is quite advanced and capable. Unfortunately, Fujifilm greatly underestimated the demand for the X-E4, and failed to secure enough parts to manufacture as many copies as they should have, inexplicably discontinuing it when there were lengthy backorder lists. Because of that, right now the X-E4 sells for several hundred dollars more used than when it was brand-new.
#4: Fujifilm X100V
The X100 is where the X-series began; the X100V is the model that unexpectedly wen’t viral when it was over two years old. This list could be filled with X100 cameras—in fact, I debated if the X100F should have been placed in the #6 or #7 positions (it was a tough cut). The X100V is the fifth iteration—the X-Trans IV version—and served as my “desert island” camera until the introduction of the X100VI earlier this year.
I love the X100V because it is small and lightweight, and has great features like a built-in ND filter and leaf shutter plus a fill-flash that just seems to work perfect. For a fixed-lens camera, it is surprisingly versatile. I don’t travel without an X100 model. It’s no wonder why the X100V was the camera to have in 2023 (although few could get it); in 2024, it’s still an excellent choice. And it might be easier to find than an X100VI.
#3: Fujifilm X-T5
The X-T5 is Fujifilm’s flagship SLR-styled traditional tactile control model. If you want the best, look no further—it’s the cream of the crop: IBIS, 40mp, weather-sealing, dual SD-card slots, etc., etc.. The X-T5 is notably smaller and lighter than the X-T4. It’s such a great camera, there’s not much negative that can be said about it. This camera could very easily be #1 on this list, and on paper it should be.
While the Fujifilm X-T5 is technically a great camera, and it did slim down compared to its predecessor, it’s more camera than I need much of the time. Because of this, I will often choose a different model, including technically inferior options like the X-E4. Sometimes data sheets and spec charts don’t tell the full story. You don’t always need a fully loaded Land Cruiser, sometimes a Camry will get you there more efficiently; still, sometimes you need the Land Cruiser.
#2: Fujifilm X-T50
The X-T50 is an X-T5, but without weather-sealing, with only one SD-card slot, with a Film Dial instead of an ISO Dial, a lower resolution-EVF, the old battery, in a smaller and lighter body, and a little cheaper. Technically speaking, the X-T5 is superior, but, over the summer, I used an X-T50 far more than an X-T5. Between the two, most of the time I chose the X-T50.
The X-T30 II is in the same series as the X-T50; however, Fujifilm says that the X-T50 is not the X-T30 II’s successor. The X-T50 is closely related and similar, but is not the X-T30 II’s replacement, as they are currently manufacturing both models. The X-T30 II is a better value (and I almost placed it at #7); overall, the X-T50 is the better camera of the two. For those wanting to get into the Fujifilm system, the X-T50 is my top recommendation, but the X-T30 II isn’t far behind.
#1: Fujifilm X100VI
I love the Fujifilm X100V, and the X100VI is even better! It is my “desert island” camera, which is to say that if I could choose only one model to use for the rest of my life, it would be this one. It is my absolute favorite photography tool, and it gets a lot of use. In my opinion, this is Fujifilm’s best camera.
The Fujifilm X100VI is by far the most preordered camera by any brand in history. We’re over six months since it was announced, and some people who preordered on Day 1 are still waiting for their camera to arrive, and some have been told that it might be closer to Christmas. There were more preorders for the X100VI than there were X100V’s manufactured over its four-year production life. Fujifilm is assembling far more X100VI’s each month than they did the X100V, yet they still can’t even make enough to fulfill the orders that were placed back in February. This is the most viral camera ever, and if the hype continues (and it might), the X100VI could potentially end up as the most-sold model of all time by any brand. If you didn’t order one right away when it was announced, you may have to wait a long time to get one.
Some of you may have noticed that both the X-H2 and X-H2s, which are Fujifilm’s top-tier flagship models, did not make this list. Nor did the very capable X-S20. The reason is very simple: those are PASM models, and I don’t care much for PASM, personally. Those cameras are intended to give the most Canikony-like experience of any Fujifilm models; if you are coming from a Canikony brand, those models are going to feel more familiar to you. I never appreciated the (modern) Canikony approach, so I’m very much drawn to the traditional tactile controls that Fujifilm is known for. Fujifilm offers a unique experience in the camera world, which is one of the big reasons why I love Fujifilm, and that unique experience is found on each of the seven models in my list. While some might see it as merely “retro” (which it is), to me its preferable. It’s better—much better, in fact. You may or may not agree with that, and that’s fine—different strokes for different folks—I’m just explaining why those particular models didn’t crack my list.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
There’s a feature on most Fujifilm cameras that few use—you might not even be aware that they exist—called Advanced Filters. Fujifilm introduced it in 2013 with the X100S and X20 models. With the exception of a few early models, your Fujifilm camera has Advanced Filters—find it on the Drive Dial or Drive Menu (depending on the specifics of your model). For older models, Advanced Filters are JPEG only; however, on newer models, you can save a RAW file in addition to the JPEG.
So why are the Advanced Filters so obscure and not widely used? Worse, why is it actually detested by some who have tried it? Well, the short answer is that Advanced Filters aren’t “advanced” at all, and are probably the most gimmicky and sometimes cringy thing Fujifilm has included in what are otherwise sophisticated cameras. My personal opinion is that some of the Advanced Filters aren’t half bad, and some are indeed bad and definitely out-of-date; none are especially good (although a couple have potential). Below I’ll briefly explain what each one of the Advanced Filters do. Also, this will serve as an open letter to Fujifilm, with suggestions on how to improve this feature for future cameras.
Here we go!
Toy Camera
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – Toy Camera
Fujifilm describes this Advanced Filter as “a retro toy camera effect”, which is to say that it is roughly modeled after a Holga or Diana film camera aesthetic. The Toy Camera Advanced Filter is ok, but the big issue—and this is a problem with all the filters—is that it cannot be customized. You get what you get, and what you get is mediocre. I have used Toy Camera several times over the years because I like the idea, but I’m always a bit disappointed in the execution.
Fujifilm could make the Toy Camera filter much better by allowing it to be customizable. First, you should be able to choose any film simulation to use with it. Second, the vignetting should be adjustable, such as Weak or Strong, with the current amount being the Strong option. You should be able to add Grain (Weak or Strong, and Small or Large). Soft Focus—which we’ll talk more about in a moment—should be merged into Toy Camera, with the options of Off, Weak or Strong (Strong being the current Soft Focus, and Off being default). You should be able to adjust the contrast: Low, Standard, and High. Finally, Fujifilm should allow you to use any White Balance that you’d like, so that you can control the tint.
Miniature
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – Miniature
This filter adds blur to the top and bottom of the frame, similar to using a tilt-shift lens. When you are photographing from an elevated vantage point, this Advanced Filter can give the illusion that the subject is a miniature model. It’s better to use an actual tilt-shift lens to get this effect, but if you don’t own one, this is an easy way to approximate it.
The Miniature filter, along with many of the others, are modeled after photography trends that were popular 15 years ago. By the time Fujifilm introduced Advanced Filters in 2013, these trends were already on their way out. Now, eleven years later, they’re very dated. While I don’t have any issues with Miniature being included, I also don’t think anyone would mind of Fujifilm axed it, or replaced it with something different entirely. How about a filter that gives an Aerochorme-like infrared aesthetic?
Pop Color
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – Pop Color
Pop Color is my favorite Advanced Filter; however, it suffers from the same problem that they all do—it cannot be customized. The solution for Fujifilm is quite simple, actually: make Pop Color the next film simulation. Obviously it wouldn’t be called Pop Color; instead, Fujifilm should call it Fortia, as it resembles Fujichrome Fortia 50 film. Perhaps they’ll need to fine-tune some aspects of it in some way in order to make it a film simulation—whatever it is that they need to do, I believe that Pop Color absolutely should graduate from Advanced Filters into the film simulation list as Fortia.
High Key / Low Key
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – High Key
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – Low Key
There’s nothing especially special about the High Key and Low Key Advanced Filters—both can be easily replicated using the Provia film simulation. You might occasionally use these two in lieu of having a Film Simulation Recipe programmed into C1-C7 with a similar look, but I don’t believe many people are doing that. Instead, you could use Recipes like Bright Kodak or Low Key for better results.
Fujifilm should replace these two Advanced Filters with something else entirely. How about a split-tone effect? Select any of the film simulations, have three-to-five different split-tone options (highlight and shadow with a different tints), plus have grain and contrast options for further customization.
Dynamic Tone
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – Dynamic Tone
“Dynamic tone expression is used for a fantasy effect,” is how Fujifilm describes it. What it reminds me of is HDR photography with aggressive tonemapping, which was all the rage 15 years ago despite being hideous. This is one that Fujifilm should definitely axe, in my opinion. They could replace it with something like a high-contrast effect, where you can choose any film sim, but where the contrast is stronger than Highlight and Shadow set to +4 (Dynamic Range, White Balance and Grain should be customizable).
Soft Focus
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – Soft Focus
This is kind of like setting Clarity to -20 and Sharpness to -10 on your Fujifilm camera. Obviously that’s not possible, but it it were, Soft Focus is what it would look like. Aside from being much too strong generally speaking, Soft Focus should be integrated into the Toy Camera filter instead of being standalone. A better Advanced Filter might be a faded effect similar to my Film Simulation Recipes that utilize double exposures like Faded Color, Vintage Color Fade, Bleach Bypass, and Faded Monochrome.
Partial Color (Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Purple)
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – Partial Color Red
Fujifilm X-T50 – Advanced Filters – Partial Color Green
The six Partial Color filters are the Monochrome film simulation (with everything set to factory defaults), but with one color recorded (either red, orange, yellow, green, blue, or purple—the singular color is the Provia film simulation). This is another effect that was popular 15 years ago, and I’m sure very few utilize it in 2024. If Fujifilm wants to keep Partial Color, they should allow it to be customized similar to how I described for the other effects; however, I doubt that many would miss it if Fujifilm got rid of it entirely. I think a cross-process filter would be much more interesting—perhaps like cross-processed Velvia, with deep contrast, vibrant colors, pronounced grain, and shifted hues. Something along the lines of the picture below, which is actual cross-processed Velvia 50 film.
To conclude, your Fujifilm camera has something called Advanced Filters that are rather mediocre at best and cringeworthy at worst. Pop Color is my personal favorite—it’s the closest your camera can get to straight-out-of-camera Fujichrome Fortia 50—and it should be made into a film simulation so that it can be customized with Grain, Color Chrome Effects, Highlight, Shadow, etc., etc.. Most of the Advanced Filters should be replaced with something else entirely, and I think I offered a number of good suggestions for that (for those keeping score, that’s Aerochrome, Split-Tone, High Contrast, Faded, and Cross Process, plus an improved Toy Camera). If you find yourself bored one day, perhaps try out some of the Advanced Filters for yourself—Pop Color is my recommendation if you’re only going to try one; otherwise, just know that you’re not missing out on much. If you are Fujifilm reading this, I would suggest working right away on new-and-improved Advanced Filters for the next generation of Fujifilm cameras.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
A straight-out-of-camera B&W IR picture from my Fujifilm X-E4
I’ve had a fascination with infrared photography for a very long time. Using light beyond the visible spectrum to create pictures often produces unusual results—an ordinary scene can become extraordinary with infrared photography. While I’ve been interested in this type of photography for awhile, I’ve not experimented much with it. Many years ago I shot a roll of IR film, but it didn’t turn out very well; that’s mostly my entire IR experience. I’m an infrared novice.
Even though digital cameras have a filter to block infrared light, many cameras are still IR sensitive. You can test your camera by pointing a TV remote (which works via infrared light) at it. When you press a button on the remote, if your camera is IR sensitive, you’ll see the infrared light in the LCD or electronic viewfinder. It turns out that my Fujifilm X-E4 is indeed IR sensitive (I believe that many Fujifilm cameras are). A few years ago I experimented using a non-IR converted X-E4 with a 720nm IR filter, and I indeed got some infrared pictures.
The big problem with IR photography, of course, is that—at least for color pictures—it requires significant editing, including swapping color channels. If you are a JPEG photographer who doesn’t want to hassle with all that, your options are quite limited. Black-and-white IR is a completely different story; you can get dramatic results out-of-camera without much trouble. For color, either you’ve got to be happy with a red picture, or you’ve got to edit. If you have a full-spectrum camera, there is one option that doesn’t require editing, but it does require that the camera be full-spectrum and not just IR converted.
SOOC JPEG from my Fujifilm X-E4 using a 720nm IR filter.
Same picture after a crude R/B color channel swap and a quick edit.
Anyway, I’m writing all of this because I told you that I’d update you regarding the Fujifilm X-T4 ES (Extended Spectrum) camera that I ordered from the Fujifilm website. Right in the middle of my move, I received an email from Fujifilm (the “monthly content roundup” email that many of you might also receive), and towards the bottom of it was an add for the Fujifilm X-T4 ES. “Look into the infrared extended spectrum and document the results in beautiful detail with this specialist version of the popular X-T4.”
There was a link in the email to the official Fujifilm online store where the X-T4 ES was listed with very little information about what it is exactly. Even though I did not know much about the specifics of its IR capabilities, I decided to order the camera anyway. The link no longer works (and hasn’t for a week-and-a-half), and the X-T4 ES can no longer be found on the website. I assumed that either the listing was a mistake, or it was sold out quickly.
Then today (two weeks after ordering) I received an email stating that the camera has shipped. Apparently the Fujifilm X-T4 ES has traversed from New Jersey to Tennessee, and just departed Memphis for Arizona within the last few minutes. It’s supposed to arrive at my door on Monday. Yea!
I searched the internet, and found very little information about the Fujifilm X-T4 ES. It was briefly listed at B&H (apparently mistakenly) back in February of last year. Fujifilm has made two other IR models—the X-T1 and GFX100—but those were specifically for “forensic, scientific, and cultural preservation applications, and will not be made available to general customers for personal use.” But the X-T4 ES was made available to the general public, just in a very limited quantity and without much fanfare. I’m not sure what “extended spectrum” even means, so that’s something I look forward to finding out.
It won’t be much longer before I’m capturing infrared pictures on a dedicated Fujifilm IR camera, but in the meantime, I have a lot of questions and very few answers. Once I have the Fujifilm X-T4 ES in my hands, I’ll be able to tell you a lot more about it. Stay tuned!
The short answer is no. The longer answer is below.
There’s a controversy that’s been brewing for awhile, but has really gained steam over the last couple of weeks, that suggests Fujifilm is purposefully crafting market shortages of products so as to create hype (or, really, FOMO), in an attempt to ensure that their products are constantly in high demand. The roots of this controversy are in the constant shortages of Fujifilm’s products. At one time, you could walk into most camera stores on any given day and buy the camera or lens that you wanted; however, over the last few years, that hasn’t always been the case. Then, just recently, Fujifilm seemed to confirm it.
Manhattan from Pulaski Bridge – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – PRO Negative 160C
“The most important point is how much brand strength to create and how to maintain it,” said Teiichi Goto, Fujifilm President and CEO, in response to a question about their inventory situation and plan. “Therefore, it would be quite unfortunate to manufacture too much and lower the price. What Fujifilm has been trying to do for a long time is finally coming true now. We intend to drive the entire imaging business, including Instax, while concentrating on building brand strength and not reducing the value of the properties purchased by our customers.” When asked if the current inventory situation is normal, Mr. Goto replied, “Yes.”
A lot of people responded to this with something to the effect of: “This proves it! Fujifilm is purposefully creating camera shortages to manipulate the market.” But I think they misunderstand it. I wasn’t planning to write this article, but, since I’ve had several people ask me to comment on the controversy, I thought I’d type out my opinion.
I’m completely convinced that if Fujifilm could produce the precise number of gear (cameras, lenses, etc.) for the current demand, so that everyone who wanted to purchase something could do so without waiting, they would. But that’s nearly impossible to correctly estimate. When PetaPixel asked for clarification if they consider insufficient supply to be part of a marketing strategy, Fujifilm responded, “No. Our marketing strategy is to showcase the innovation behind our lineup of digital cameras and lenses to provide creators with a variety of options so they can choose the right tools for their craft.”
Sign on the Roof – Gila Bend, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Classic Color
It takes many months for a camera to be manufactured and end up at a camera store. Fujifilm has to secure the parts, get them assembled, and shipped across the world. They are guessing in December what the demand might be in July. And there are limited resources for manufacturing. How many parts can a supplier produce at any given time? How many cameras can an assembly line put together each day? The whole process is much more complex than I think many people assume. Fujifilm not only has to anticipate future demand, but they have to figure out how to meet that within the constrains of many and various limitations.
Demand isn’t steady, but constantly fluctuating. It can spike unexpectedly, and fall off a cliff unexpectedly. If the demand for a certain camera suddenly ceases, Fujifilm needs to anticipate that months and months in advance, or they’ll continue to manufacture tens of thousands of copies of a product that few are buying.
Let’s look at the Fujifilm X100V. It was released in early 2020, and, for about two-and-a-half years, Fujifilm was more-or-less manufacturing the number of copies it needed in order to meet the demand for that camera. Then, suddenly, demand spiked, due to several viral TikTok videos. Fujifilm did not ramp up production (or, if they did, it wasn’t nearly enough) of the X100V, likely because they assumed the hype would quickly dissipate, especially since the camera was approaching three-years-old at the time; however, they guessed wrong.
Sentinel & Merced – Yosemite NP, CA – Fujifilm X100V – Vintage Color
For the X100VI, Fujifilm assumed that doubling the production of the X100V would be enough to meet the anticipated demand for it. Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your perspective, the demand for the X100VI was historic and unprecedented. There were more preorders for the X100VI in China alone than there were X100V’s manufactured in total. Fujifilm has said that they will be increasing production of the X100VI, but I’m not certain to what extent exactly (I’ve heard that it could be 30,000 units per month by sometime in the summer, but I have no idea what the precise numbers are right now).
This is uncharted territory for not just Fujifilm, but for any camera maker. Fujifilm has to try to meet steep current demand while being hyper alert for any changes in future demand. If, for example, they are actually making 30K cameras per month, and suddenly the floor drops and nobody wants one, and they’ve already set in motion the manufacturing of 150K cameras, that could be enough to bankrupt the company (at least the camera division).
Another example is the Fujifilm X-E3 and X-E4 cameras. Fujifilm anticipated that demand for the X-E3 would be greater than it actually was, and made too many copies. Fujifilm had to discount the X-E3, and sometimes significantly, to clear the warehouse. You could still find brand-new (and discounted) X-E3 bodies 18 months after it had been officially discontinued. Fujifilm used the sales figures of the X-E3 to estimate the demand for the X-E4; however, the X-E4 was much more in-demand than the X-E3 was (largely because it was viewed as a top alternative to the impossible-to-find X100V in the aftermath of the viral videos). Fujifilm did not secure enough parts to manufacture nearly enough copies to meet the demand of the X-E4, and likely assumed (incorrectly) that the spike in demand would be short-lived. If you look at eBay, X-E4’s are listed for double the price of X-E3’s, and much higher than the MSRP when they were brand-new.
I bring that up for a specific reason. While consumers prefer over-manufacturing (especially since it usually means one can find bargains, and you can readily buy what you want), producers prefer under-manufacturing. Most ideal is precise-manufacturing, but that is really difficult to achieve; between over and under, every company—including Fujifilm—would much prefer to err on the side of making too few of something than too much. And, if you want the gear that you spent a lot of money on to retain its value, you, too, will prefer them to err on the side of caution.
Toyota created the Toyota Production System in the aftermath of WWII. This system invented what is now referred to as Lean Manufacturing (or Lean Business Philosophy or Lean Strategy Process). Many books have been written on this topic—I have a few on my library shelf, although I’ve only actually read one. To understand Fujifilm’s approach to manufacturing and inventory means understanding the Lean approach, which is used worldwide, especially in Japan. This Harvard Business Review article gives a very brief synopsis of what the Lean strategy is, just to give you an idea; even better, I’m sure your local bookstore has a few books on this topic.
The conclusion is that Fujifilm (along with all manufacturers) is in the tough position of trying to accurately gauge demand for each product they offer, and attempt to produce just the right amount; if they are going to err on one side or the other, they much prefer to err by producing too few copies than too many. Making too many of something reduces its value, while making just the right amount or too few does not. They have to guess what the demand will be many months from now, not just what the current demand is. The current demand might be an indication of future demand, but it also might not. Fujifilm would love to make and sell 50,000 copies of something, but just because they make 50,000 copies of something doesn’t mean that they will actually sell them all. A much better position for Fujifilm is to make 30,00 copies of something, and sell them all. That’s not manipulating the market, but simply good business strategy that provides some stability in a turbulent market.
The Fujifilm X-E4 is one of my absolute favorite Fujifilm cameras. There was a lot of demand for it, then, inexplicably, Fujifilm discontinued the X-E4 while there was still a fairly lengthy backorder list. According to Fujirumors, Fujifilm is working on the X-E5 right now, possibly to be released sometime in 2025. There’s a reasonable chance that Fujifilm will read this, so I thought I’d take the opportunity to express my wish-list for the camera.
The Fujifilm X-E1 was my gateway into the Fujifilm system. The camera, which was released in 2012 and was Fujifilm’s second interchangeable-lens X-series camera (only preceded by the X-Pro1), was praised for its beautiful retro rangefinder design (nicknamed “Sexy One”), but also criticized for its sluggish performance (some of which was rectified in firmware updates). The X-E1 was fairly quickly replaced by the X-E2, and a minor updated version called the X-E2s was released at the end of the X-Trans II lifecycle (beginning the pattern of X-E cameras released near the end of a sensor generation). While the X-E series has a history of somewhat slow sales, the cameras tend to be much beloved by those who own them. The X-E4 did not experience sluggish sales (in fact, Fujifilm was unable to meet the strong demand); however, it was discontinued anyway, presumably because Fujifilm did not secure enough parts to produce more.
I love the Fujifilm X-E4 because it is small and lightweight, which makes it more pleasant to carry around as an everyday camera. When traveling, there’s limited space for gear in the bag, and tough choices must be made; the X-E4 takes up less room than other bodies, so it’s more likely to be chosen over larger and heavier cameras. In fact, the X-E4 and X100V (and now X100VI) have been my go-to travel cameras since 2021. I also appreciate its clean minimalistic design of the camera.
Fujifilm could simply engrave “X-E5” on the new camera and include the X-Processor 5, but keep everything else completely identical to the X-E4, and it would sell. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. People wanted the X-E4 but simply couldn’t get it. An X-E5 that is just an X-E4 with the new processor and the new film simulations would do quite well, I’m certain of it. The less Fujifilm changes, the better.
With that said, there are some things that would make the X-E5 even better than the X-E4. I do feel the minimalistic approach was perhaps a bit too minimalistic. The five key changes that I would make if I were one of the designers are: 1) bring back the M/C/S switch, 2) add an ISO Ring around the Shutter Knob like the X100 and X-Pro series have, 3) add back the rear command dial, 4) improve the EVF resolution, and 5) add a small grip to the front like the X-E3 has.
These might be unpopular opinions, but I would use the “old” 26mp X-Trans IV sensor in combination with the X-Trans V processor (like the X-S20); IBIS is unnecessary, and should be avoided for weight and cost reasons; the camera doesn’t need to be weather-sealed. Keep the X-E5 as similar to the X-E4 as possible, just refine it a little with a handful of small improvements.
There’s a massive opportunity that I believe Fujifilm has largely ignored. One of the biggest advantages of APS-C over full-frame is size/weight. There are tradeoffs with anything, and APS-C seems to strike a near perfect balance of size/weight, performance, image quality, and value. While full-frame cameras have been shrinking lately, APS-C has not; instead, the APS-C advantage has been shrinking. This is easily rectified, though, and the X-E5 is one step towards that, but it needs to be kept small, light, and affordable. The other key piece that’s missing are pancake lenses.
Yes, there’s the exceptional Fujinon XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR; however, it’s not often readily available for purchase. Likely, you have to add yourself to a backorder list and wait awhile. There’s also the sort-of pancake (Japanese pancake?) Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R, but it is old, overpriced, and in desperate need of an update. Otherwise, there aren’t many options—at least not natively; however, there are some 3rd-party pancake lenses that have recently appeared, which is good. Fujifilm needs to add a few more pancakes to the Fujinon lineup, and not be satisfied with just two.
I think a total of five pancake lenses would do the trick. The 27mm f/2.8 already exists, but simply needs to be made available. The 18mm f/2 also already exists, although I would strongly encourage Fujifilm to update it. The three lenses that, in my opinion, Fujifilm should add to the pancake lens lineup are 15mm f/3.5, 23mm f/2.8, and 40mm f/2.8. That gives a good variety, and all five would together make for a fantastic kit.
Since Fujifilm already has two 23mm lenses—the 23mm f/2 and 23mm f/1.4—they might consider something else that they don’t have, perhaps 20mm or 25mm, but definitely something in-between 18mm and 27mm. Instead of 40mm, a longer focal-length could alternatively be chosen, such as 45mm f/3.5 or 55mm f/4. The point is to have something wider than 18mm, something more telephoto than 27mm, and an option in-between the 18mm and 27mm.
A small and lightweight camera—such as the X-E5—combined with a handful of small lenses would make an ideal kit for travel and walk-around photography. It would clearly illustrate a significant advantage of APS-C over full-frame—imagine a camera and five-lens kit that could all fit into a small camera bag! I have no doubt that it would be successful, but it would require that Fujifilm clearly articulate why a small camera with small lenses should be desirable.
I don’t know if the “right” people at Fujifilm will read this, or, if they do, if they’ll listen. But, just in case, I wanted to make sure to get my opinions out there. Now it’s your turn! What would you like to see in a Fujifilm X-E5? What pancake lenses do you think that Fujifilm should make? Let me know in the comments!
Leica is the camera brand that everyone desires, but few can afford. Premium is the word that best describes Leica. Crème de la crème, or perhaps Beste der Besten. If you can afford a Leica you buy a Leica, because every real photographer wants a Leica. It’s a status symbol, and it shows that you’ve arrived.
All of that is hyperbole, of course; however, there’s a good chance you’ve heard the sentiment before. An alternative yet similar statement is that Fujifilm is the poor man’s Leica. You only own a Fujifilm camera because you cannot afford a Leica model; if you could, you’d own a Leica instead.
I’ve wanted to try a Leica for some time now. The cameras are beautiful, there’s no question about it. But is it beauty over brawn? Are Leica cameras actually so good that the cost is justifiable? Would I—a long-time Fujifilm photographer—like a Leica enough to purchase one? Are Fujifilm cameras just cheap Leica knockoffs for those who cannot afford the real deal? Those are questions that I wanted to answer.
MPB is the sponsor of this article. They loaned me a Leica Q2 to try out for a couple of weeks. For those who don’t know, MPB is an online platform where you can buy, sell, or trade used photo and video gear. “At MPB, there’s something for everyone who wants to try something new, hone their skills, or pursue their passion—and it won’t cost the earth.” If you’re in the market for used camera gear, be sure to check out their platform—you can learn more about MPB here. Thank you, MPB, for making this article possible!
Leica Q2
For those who don’t know, the Leica Q2 is a premium compact fixed-lens 47mp full-frame camera. It is simultaneously somewhat similar to the Fujifilm X100VI, Fujifilm X-E4, and Fujifilm X70, yet significantly divergent from all of those models in several aspects. It has a 28mm f/1.7 lens that is fast and sharp. The camera was released in 2019, and discontinued last year when it was succeeded by the Q3. The original MSRP of the Q2 was $5,800; the current used price is roughly $4,500 to $3,800, depending on the condition. The specific Leica Q2 that I picked from the MPB platform was exactly as described: the camera functioned like it was brand-new; the body had only extremely minor signs of wear, which I was well aware of due to the gear-specific ‘cosmetic condition’ rating (“Excellent” in this case) displayed on the platform.
Something that I was unexpectedly impressed with was the Leica box. I know this sounds strange, but Leica is head and shoulders above the other brands when it comes to packaging. I’d pay a little more to have my Fujifilm cameras come in functional boxes similar to what the Q2 came in. Sometimes the little things can be big things.
I didn’t know a whole lot about the Leica Q2 before this project. I was quite surprised by just how minimalistic the Q2 is. In this regard it is more like the Fujifilm X-E4, which is Fujifilm’s most minimalistic model in recent years, but even more so. There are not very many buttons and controls on the body. For a camera that begs to be used fully manually, it is incomprehensibly missing an ISO dial; however, it is possible to use the unmarked knob on the top plate as an ISO dial by programming the button on top of it to activate ISO. That’s not ideal, but it is certainly better than digging through the menu. On one hand I do like the clean approach, but on the other hand I found it to be a bit too minimalistic for my liking.
There’s no doubt that the Leica Q2 is a beautifully designed camera that is solidly built. While the body is just a tad larger than the Fujifilm X100VI, the lens is significantly larger, and the whole thing is definitely heavier. It’s easy to understand why it would be compared to the X100VI, but the Q2 is a little more similar to the X-E4 (just with a fixed lens instead of interchangeable, and more ruggedly built). The Q2’s 28mm lens is roughly equivalent to 18mm on Fujifilm X cameras, so that’s where a comparison to the long-discontinued X70 comes in. Probably the closest lens in the Fujifilm lineup to that of the Q2 is the Fujinon 18mm f/1.4. Overall, I think the Leica Q2 is dissimilar enough to any Fujifilm model that it’s really apples-to-oranges, yet similar enough that the correlations are understandable.
The Leica Q2 is best when used with a RAW workflow. It’s ok for straight-out-of-camera photography, but definitely much more limited in that regard than Fujifilm. The JPEG image quality is good-but-not-great. There are five profiles—three color and two B&W—which can only be customized to a small extent. For color, Standard is somewhat reminiscent of the Provia film simulation, Vivid can be made to fairly closely resemble factory-default Velvia, and Natural is like a cross between Eterna and PRO Neg. Std. I didn’t care much for Standard, and opted for Vivid the most, and Natural a distant second. For B&W, the two profiles are quite similar to each other, and are much more reminiscent of Monochrome than Acros (on Fujifilm). The High Contrast option has stronger shadows, but is otherwise similar to the standard B&W profile; it can be hard to tell the two apart sometimes. Since I stopped editing RAW files years ago, I only used the camera-made JPEGs.
Two notable issues for using the camera for JPEG photography is that it quite obviously struggles with color banding, such as with clear blue sky, and there is some pronounced distortion from the wide-angle lens that the camera doesn’t fix for you. In some situations, simply adding faux grain might be enough to cover up the banding, but other times that won’t likely be enough. For the distortion, either you have to be ok with it, or you have to adjust it in-post, and, if you are doing that, you might as well just shoot RAW.
It was definitely fun to try out the Leica Q2. I can understand why people desire it, since the camera has a lovely retro design and a minimalism philosophy, two things that I personally appreciate. I think you have to know going into it that RAW editing is more-or-less essential. I’d love to see Fujifilm create a camera that could be more of an apples-to-apples comparison to the Q2, so that you could have a similar experience but paired with Fujifilm’s wonderful JPEG output; currently, no such camera exists.
The Leica Q2 is both beauty and brawn, but not nearly as much JPEG brawn as I had hoped for. I do find the price to be very difficult to justify; however, if it’s a camera that you really want—and you buy it used—it can probably be a worthwhile expenditure. I don’t intend to purchase one, personally, particularly since the JPEG output isn’t nearly as good as Fujifilm’s. While there are certainly some similarities between Leica and Fujifilm cameras, there are plenty of differences that produce notably divergent experiences. If the Leica Q2 experience is what you are after, you’ll just have to get the Q2.
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured with a Leica Q2:
