Fujifilm lenses | FUJI X WEEKLY

Review: Viltrox Conversion Lenses for Fujifilm X100VI

Viltrox just released two conversion lenses for Fujifilm X100-series cameras: WCL-X100VI and TCL-X100VI. These lenses are very similar to Fujifilm’s own conversion lenses for the X100-series, the WCL-X100 II and TCL-X100 II, and if you don’t look closely, you might not notice the differences, as they seem nearly identical. How does the Viltrox version stack up? Should you even consider these for your Fujifilm X100VI? If so, which should you get, Viltrox or Fujinon?

I need to tell you upfront that Viltrox sent me the two lenses to try out. They didn’t give any expectations other than, “We look forward to your impression of the lenses.” This review serves as that. It’s my honest feedback to Viltrox, while also hopefully being helpful to those considering these lenses for their X100VI or other X100-series camera.

There are two conversion lenses—Viltrox WCL-X100VI and TCL-X100VI—and I want to talk about them individually, but also as a set. We’ll begin with the wide-converter, then the teleconverter, and finish up by discussing the two together. Let’s dive right in!

Viltrox WCL-X100VI

The Viltrox WCL-X100VI is a wide conversion lens that’s nearly identical to the Fujinon WCL-X100 II. It has an 0.8x magnification, which, when screwed onto the end of the X100VI’s lens, changes the focal-length from 35mm to 28mm (full-frame equivalents; 23mm to 19mm in APS-C terms). It makes the camera a little more wide-angle, which can be useful when the native focal-length is just a little too tight for the circumstance.

On X100-series cameras, there is a hidden thread for a filter/hood adapter, which reveals itself when a ring on the end of the lens is unscrewed. Both of the conversion lenses attach to this thread, simply by screwing onto it. The WCL-X100VI is threaded to accept 49mm filters. Oh, and the camera automatically recognizes that you attached the lens, just like the Fujinon WCL-X100 II.

*Sun Peek, Bougainvillea Peak* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox WCL – Pacific Blues

From my measurements, the Viltrox version is just a hair smaller than the Fujinon, and weighs just slightly less (very minimally on both accounts). Using the TCL adds some size and weight to the camera, but, for the WCL-X100VI, this isn’t a major deal, because the lens is pretty small. The added bulk and heft is a small price for the extra versatility.

As for both the build and image quality, the lens seems to be on par with the Fujinon option. There’s a little difference in how the lens flares, but otherwise it seems to render images pretty much identically. A lot of times when you buy a third-party version of a lens, it’s less expensive, but it’s pretty obvious why, as it feels cheaper and/or has image quality flaws. With the Viltrox conversion lenses, there does not seem to be any reduction in quality. You’re not giving up anything to save a little money. In the case of the WCL-X100VI, it’s not a little money, but a significant chunk of change! The Viltrox WCL-X100VI has an MSRP of $159; the Fujinon WCL-X100 II is a lot more expensive at $399. For a lot less than half the cost, you basically get the same exact thing.

Viltox TCL-X100VI

The Viltrox TCL-X100VI is a tele conversion lens that’s nearly identical to the Fujinon TCL-X100 II. It has a 1.4x magnification, which, when screwed onto the end of the X100VI’s lens, changes the focal-length from 35mm to 50mm (full-frame equivalents; 23mm to 33mm in APS-C terms). It makes the camera a “standard” focal-length, which can be useful when the native focal-length is just a little too wide for the circumstance.

Like the WCL, the TCL-X100VI attaches to the camera by screwing onto the hidden filter/hood adapter thread. It accepts 67mm filters. Also like the WCL, the camera recognizes when you attach the lens, just like it does for the Fujinon TCL-X100 II.

*Sun-Kissed Bougainvillea* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL – Pacific Blues

From my measurements, the Viltrox version is just barely a hair smaller than the Fujinon; however, the weight difference is notable, with the Viltrox coming in at about 25% heavier, or 0.1 pounds more, than the Fujinon. For both brands, the TCL is larger and heavier than the WCL, which makes it a little less practical for carrying around. Even so, I really like 50mm (full-frame equivalent), so I tend to use the TCL more than the WCL, personally.

Just like the WCL-X100VI, for both the build and image quality, the TCL-X100VI seems to be right on par with the Fujinon option. There’s a little difference in how the lens flares, but otherwise it seems to render images pretty much identically. You’re not giving up anything to save a little money. The Viltrox TCL-X100VI has an MSRP of $189; the Fujinon TCL-X100 II is a lot more expensive at $399. For less than half the cost, you basically get the same exact thing.

Both Lenses

Last year, I travelled to Austin, Texas, and the only camera I took was a Fujifilm X100VI with the Fujinon WCL-X100 II and TCL-X100 II conversion lenses. It allowed me to travel light but still have some focal-length versatility. An X100-series camera with the two conversion lenses is a compact and powerful three-lens kit. But, for the Fujinon, those two additional lenses will run you $798, which is a lot of money; however, with Viltrox, you can do it for only $348, which is a bargain. If you own an X100-series camera, you should buy these two lenses. Despite having “X100VI” in the name, the conversion lenses will work on any X100-series model, not just the latest iteration.

When you combine the conversion lenses with the built-in digital teleconverter, you get even more focal-length versatility: 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 70mm, and 100mm (full-frame equivalents). On the X100VI, to get 70mm requires both the TCL and the digital teleconverter, and you go from 40mp to 20mp (which is still plenty of resolution); to get to 100mm, you’ll get a 10mp file, which is fine for social media use, but it’s not ideal for photos you intend to print much larger than 8″x12″. You can also skip the digital teleconverter and simply crop after-the-fact and accomplish the same thing.

*Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox WCL-X100VI – 28mm*

*Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI – 50mm*

*Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI + Digital Teleconverter (1.4x) – 70mm*

*Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI + Digital Teleconverter (2x) – 100mm*

A three lens kit for your X100VI, which requires only two additional lenses, is nice to have, but it does kind of defeat the purpose of the camera, which is a compact one-camera-one-lens philosophy. I wish that Fujifilm made a wide-angle and nifty-fifty alternative versions of the X100VI (like Sigma did with the DP camera series), so that you could choose the focal length that fits you best. Since they don’t, if you want to adjust the focal length yourself, it does require adding some extra bulk.

What works for me is to keep the conversion lenses in my pockets, and simply screw one onto the camera whenever I need it. With two front pockets in my jeans or shorts, I can have the WCL in one pocket and the TCL in the other. Viltrox includes a little bag in the box that helps to protect the lens when doing this. I’m able to use the X100VI as a fixed-lens 35mm (full-frame equivalent) camera most of the time, but go wider or more telephoto whenever I need to. When you want to travel light, this is quite ideal.

*Fountain at Dusk* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI – Summer of ’59

To save a little weight, choose the Fujinon TCL over the Viltrox TCL. The Fujinon TCL-X100 II is large and already heavy enough; the Viltrox TCL-X100VI adds a noticeable amount of additional weight. Unfortunately, a second-hand Fujinon TCL-X100 II costs more than the Viltrox version brand-new. If you don’t mind spending an extra $50 or so and getting a used model, the most ideal scenario is to purchase the Viltrox WCL-X100VI and the Fujinon TCL-X100 II. Or, just save a few bucks and don’t worry about 0.1 pounds, and get both Viltrox options.

Both lenses come in silver and black. If you have a silver X100-series camera, you’ll probably want the silver lenses; if you have a black X100-series camera, you’ll probably want the black lenses. I definitely do recommend the Viltrox conversion lenses. I was quite surprised at both the build and image quality, especially considering the price. You won’t break the bank, so get one. Or get both.

Above, clockwise from top-left: Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox WCL-X100VI + Kodachrome 64; Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI + Classic Amber; Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI + Summer of ’59; Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox WCL-X100VI + FRGMT B&W; Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox WCL-X100VI + FRGMT B&W; Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox WCL-X100VI + Superia Negative; Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI + Summer of ’59; Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI + Summer of ’59; Fujifilm X100VI + Viltrox TCL-X100VI + Superia Negative.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X100VI in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X100VI in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Viltrox WCL-X100VI in black:
Amazon, B&H
Viltrox WCL-X100VI in silver:
Amazon, B&H
Viltrox TCL-X100VI in black:
Amazon, B&H
Viltrox TCL-X100VI in silver:
Amazon, B&H

Lens Review: Pergear 25mm F/1.7

Posted on December 14, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

Back in April, Pergear announced a new lens: Pergear 25mm f/1.7. This is a compact lens that’s not quite pancake, but not far from it either. It’s a little larger than the Fujinon 27mm f/2.8, and a little smaller than the Fujinon 23mm f/2. I appreciate small gear, so I got this diminutive lens specifically to pair with my Fujifilm X-E4. The Pergear 25mm f/1.7 looks really good on the X-E4; it’s an aesthetic match to the retro-styled Fujifilm models, with the right amount of vintage-like charm. The 25mm focal-length is 37.5mm full-frame-equivalent, which is good for everyday walk-around photography.

It is a manual-focus lens, which means there’s no auto-focus capabilities. I learned photography on manual lenses, so I don’t mind them personally; however, if you don’t have much experience manually focusing, it will likely take you a little practice to feel comfortable with it. The focus ring is smooth on this lens. The minimum focus distance is about eight inches, which isn’t bad. The lens has 7 Elements in 5 Groups, and 10 blades. The filter thread size is 37mm. Also, there’s no communication with the camera.

The aperture ring has clicks, and steps in full stops—there are no intermediate apertures, such as f/3.5 or f/5, which is a bit unusual (although a long time ago this wasn’t odd at all). The maximum aperture is a bright f/1.7, but skips f/2 and goes straight for f/2.8. The minimum aperture is f/22; however, due to diffraction, f/22 should probably be avoided. The aperture ring has a good amount of stiffness, and the clicks obvious, meaning that you won’t accidentally change the aperture, and you can mentally keep track of the aperture adjustments without having to take your eye off the EVF.

The Pergear 25mm f/1.7 is a very different lens depending on the aperture. When wide open at f/1.7, center sharpness is sufficient but not impressive, and the corners are soft with some vignetting. It’s also prone to a hazy flare if there is a bright light source in front of you. This can give a cinematic or even atmospheric effect sometimes, and can be used creatively. Things improve notably as you stop down. By f/5.6 the technical flaws that are obvious at f/1.7 are nearly gone, and this lens can hold its own pretty well against many others. In other words, for a clinically clean lens, you will want to be in the f/5.6 to f/8 range, but for more interesting character, you’ll want to increase the aperture. Also, you can get some nice sunstars at f/11 and especially f/16. I feel like there is enough of a difference in outcome at f/1.7, f/2.8-f/4, f/5.6-f/8, and f/11-f/16, that you could almost compartmentalize those apertures for specific situations and desired picture aesthetics.

This lens retails for only $75, which is quite affordable. It seems well built and robust. There’s a lot to like about the Pergear 25mm f/1.7 lens, and it’s easy to overlook the shortcomings because it is so inexpensive. I’m very happy with it, personally, and plan to use it regularly on my Fujifilm X-E4.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Pergear 25mm f/1.7:
Amazon

Example photos, all camera-made JPEGs using the Pergear 25mm f/1.7 lens on my Fujifilm X-E4:

*Snake Boots* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 + Pergear 25mm f/1.7 – Kodak Tri-X 400

*Cowboy Hat 1* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 + Pergear 25mm f/1.7 – Kodak Tri-X 400

*Cowboy Hat 2* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 + Pergear 25mm f/1.7 – Superia Negative

*Arizona Autumn* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 + Peargear 25mm f/1.7 – Superia Negative

*Hanging Bougainvillea* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 + Pergear 25mm f/1.7 – Classic Color

*Backlit Bougainvillea Blooms* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 + Pergear 25mm f/1.7 – Kodak Portra 160

*Red Blossoms* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 + Pergear 25mm f/1.7 – Agfachrome RS 100

*Christmas Soldier* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 + Pergear 25mm f/1.7 – Fujicolor 100 Gold

Find these Film Simulation Recipes and over 350 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

My Fujifilm X-E5 Wish List

Posted on July 6, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

The Fujifilm X-E4 is one of my absolute favorite Fujifilm cameras. There was a lot of demand for it, then, inexplicably, Fujifilm discontinued the X-E4 while there was still a fairly lengthy backorder list. According to Fujirumors, Fujifilm is working on the X-E5 right now, possibly to be released sometime in 2025. There’s a reasonable chance that Fujifilm will read this, so I thought I’d take the opportunity to express my wish-list for the camera.

The Fujifilm X-E1 was my gateway into the Fujifilm system. The camera, which was released in 2012 and was Fujifilm’s second interchangeable-lens X-series camera (only preceded by the X-Pro1), was praised for its beautiful retro rangefinder design (nicknamed “Sexy One”), but also criticized for its sluggish performance (some of which was rectified in firmware updates). The X-E1 was fairly quickly replaced by the X-E2, and a minor updated version called the X-E2s was released at the end of the X-Trans II lifecycle (beginning the pattern of X-E cameras released near the end of a sensor generation). While the X-E series has a history of somewhat slow sales, the cameras tend to be much beloved by those who own them. The X-E4 did not experience sluggish sales (in fact, Fujifilm was unable to meet the strong demand); however, it was discontinued anyway, presumably because Fujifilm did not secure enough parts to produce more.

I love the Fujifilm X-E4 because it is small and lightweight, which makes it more pleasant to carry around as an everyday camera. When traveling, there’s limited space for gear in the bag, and tough choices must be made; the X-E4 takes up less room than other bodies, so it’s more likely to be chosen over larger and heavier cameras. In fact, the X-E4 and X100V (and now X100VI) have been my go-to travel cameras since 2021. I also appreciate its clean minimalistic design of the camera.

*Pacific Poppies* – Montaña de Oro SP, CA – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe

Fujifilm could simply engrave “X-E5” on the new camera and include the X-Processor 5, but keep everything else completely identical to the X-E4, and it would sell. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. People wanted the X-E4 but simply couldn’t get it. An X-E5 that is just an X-E4 with the new processor and the new film simulations would do quite well, I’m certain of it. The less Fujifilm changes, the better.

With that said, there are some things that would make the X-E5 even better than the X-E4. I do feel the minimalistic approach was perhaps a bit too minimalistic. The five key changes that I would make if I were one of the designers are: 1) bring back the M/C/S switch, 2) add an ISO Ring around the Shutter Knob like the X100 and X-Pro series have, 3) add back the rear command dial, 4) improve the EVF resolution, and 5) add a small grip to the front like the X-E3 has.

These might be unpopular opinions, but I would use the “old” 26mp X-Trans IV sensor in combination with the X-Trans V processor (like the X-S20); IBIS is unnecessary, and should be avoided for weight and cost reasons; the camera doesn’t need to be weather-sealed. Keep the X-E5 as similar to the X-E4 as possible, just refine it a little with a handful of small improvements.

*Fujifilm X-E4 + Fujinon 27mm f/2.8 + Kodak Vision3 250D Recipe*

There’s a massive opportunity that I believe Fujifilm has largely ignored. One of the biggest advantages of APS-C over full-frame is size/weight. There are tradeoffs with anything, and APS-C seems to strike a near perfect balance of size/weight, performance, image quality, and value. While full-frame cameras have been shrinking lately, APS-C has not; instead, the APS-C advantage has been shrinking. This is easily rectified, though, and the X-E5 is one step towards that, but it needs to be kept small, light, and affordable. The other key piece that’s missing are pancake lenses.

Yes, there’s the exceptional Fujinon XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR; however, it’s not often readily available for purchase. Likely, you have to add yourself to a backorder list and wait awhile. There’s also the sort-of pancake (Japanese pancake?) Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R, but it is old, overpriced, and in desperate need of an update. Otherwise, there aren’t many options—at least not natively; however, there are some 3rd-party pancake lenses that have recently appeared, which is good. Fujifilm needs to add a few more pancakes to the Fujinon lineup, and not be satisfied with just two.

I think a total of five pancake lenses would do the trick. The 27mm f/2.8 already exists, but simply needs to be made available. The 18mm f/2 also already exists, although I would strongly encourage Fujifilm to update it. The three lenses that, in my opinion, Fujifilm should add to the pancake lens lineup are 15mm f/3.5, 23mm f/2.8, and 40mm f/2.8. That gives a good variety, and all five would together make for a fantastic kit.

*Fujifilm X-E4 + Fujinon 18mm f/2 + Fujicolor Superia 800 Recipe*

Since Fujifilm already has two 23mm lenses—the 23mm f/2 and 23mm f/1.4—they might consider something else that they don’t have, perhaps 20mm or 25mm, but definitely something in-between 18mm and 27mm. Instead of 40mm, a longer focal-length could alternatively be chosen, such as 45mm f/3.5 or 55mm f/4. The point is to have something wider than 18mm, something more telephoto than 27mm, and an option in-between the 18mm and 27mm.

A small and lightweight camera—such as the X-E5—combined with a handful of small lenses would make an ideal kit for travel and walk-around photography. It would clearly illustrate a significant advantage of APS-C over full-frame—imagine a camera and five-lens kit that could all fit into a small camera bag! I have no doubt that it would be successful, but it would require that Fujifilm clearly articulate why a small camera with small lenses should be desirable.

I don’t know if the “right” people at Fujifilm will read this, or, if they do, if they’ll listen. But, just in case, I wanted to make sure to get my opinions out there. Now it’s your turn! What would you like to see in a Fujifilm X-E5? What pancake lenses do you think that Fujifilm should make? Let me know in the comments!

TTArtisan 35mm F/1.8 Autofocus for Fujifilm X-Mount

Posted on November 20, 2023 by Ritchie Roesch

Back in early-August, Pergear reached out to me and asked if I’d be interested in testing out an upcoming lens. I said sure, agreeing to provide feedback and keep quiet about the lens until it was announced sometime in the future. Two weeks later a box arrived at my door containing a TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 Autofocus lens. I eagerly attached it to my Fujifilm X-T5 and put it to use!

Before I go any further, I want to state a few important notes. To start, this is the first time that I’ve ever been given a chance to try out and provide feedback for a piece of unreleased camera gear. Heck, I’ve barely been offered gear that’s already been available! This was such a big honor, and I appreciate the opportunity given to me by Pergear. I hope it’s not the last time, or that it’s limited to just one manufacturer (Fujifilm: hint, hint). Second, my copy of the TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF was a preproduction model. They told me that the production version would have a slight tweak to the mount (which, for my copy, is X-mount, if that wasn’t obvious), but the optics and functionality would be identical; however, I have some notes (and an apology) about this in just a moment. Third, I wasn’t given any technical information until after I’d finished writing this review, so I had to edit that information in as best as I could.

*Fujifilm X-T5 + TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/9 + Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipe*

The TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF competes directly with the Fujinon XC 35mm f/2 lens, which is the budget version of the XF 35mm f/2. Those two Fujinon lenses are, as far as I understand, optically identical, but the cheaper XC version lacks an aperture ring and weather-sealing. Going head-to-head with such a high-image-quality-yet-still-very-affordable lens seems a bit risky. Clearly, if money is no concern, one will opt for the $400 XF version (which is both smaller and better-looking); however, those on a tight budget now have two lenses to consider: the $200 Fujinon XC 35mm f/2 or the $149 TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF. At $280, the Viltrox 33mm f/1.4 AF could also be mentioned. Plus there are a number of manual focus options, including the TTArtisan 35mm f/1.4, TTArtisan 35mm f/0.95, and Meike 35mm f/1.7, which I compared side-by-side in Sedona earlier this year.

From a pure technical image-quality perspective, the Fujinon options are significantly superior. The TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF lens has some corner softness when wide-open, as well as vignetting. Across the entire frame, the TTArtisan is noticeably less crisp at f/1.8 than the Fujinon is at f/2. Once you stop down, things quickly improve, and the TTArtisan is quite excellent (and comparable to the Fujinon) from around f/5 or so and beyond, with nothing negative to report. There are 10 elements in 8 groups, with 9 aperture blades. The minimum focus distance is about two feet, which is so-so. The lens seems to be well built, with more metal than plastic. The filter thread size is 52mm. Of course, photography is art, and character in real-world use can be much more important than test charts and spec sheets, so we’ll move right along.

Thankfully, the TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF has excellent character, especially when a bright light source is just outside of the frame. I cannot tell you strongly enough how much I love how this lens flares! However, this is where I need to apologize. You see, I told Pergear that I really love the flare produced by this lens—especially the multiple rainbow flare—and showed them some examples of it, but their response was not what I expected: they didn’t think that most of their customers would appreciate it, so steps would be taken to reduce it. I reached out to them a few weeks later to inquire what was changed to reduce the flare, and they simply replied that TTArtisan reduced the flare, but did not change any of the optics or coatings. So I don’t know what’s different between my preproduction version and the final version that’s now for sale, but apparently there is a difference, and my copy is more prone to the absolutely wonderful flare, and yours less so to some extent, if at all. I pleaded with them not to make this change, but to no avail. I hope that whatever they did change has a minimal impact on flaring, but I have no idea. The lens comes with a square lens hood (mine did not), and maybe that was their solution; I’d definitely try the lens without the hood and see what you get.

The TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF doesn’t have an aperture ring. This might or might not be a big deal to you, but it is to me. In my opinion, all lenses for Fujifilm X cameras should have an aperture ring, because it’s such an integral part of the experience for the majority of Fujifilm models. However, I do understand that not everyone feels the same as I do, and that many third-party lenses are available for other systems where aperture rings are less common or essential. I told Pergear that if this lens was offered with an aperture ring, I’d definitely buy it. I hope that TTArtisan makes an aperture ring version at some point in the future. I don’t know how much that would cost, but I think $250 would be a fair price for such a lens. The minimum aperture is f/1.8 and the maximum is f/16, with 1/3 intermediate stops in-between the full stops (except for in-between f/11 and f/16, where it has only a single 1/3-stop before jumping 2/3-stop to f/16); however, you must use the command dial to adjust the aperture, which isn’t my preference. That makes the use of this lens more frustrating (and, in turn, less fun) than it should be.

*Fujifilm X-T5 + TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/2.5 + Reala Ace Recipe*

There’s one issue that I want to mention cautiously, and that you must take with a big grain of salt. While the autofocus was quiet, I experienced a lot of focus-hunting and misses with the TTArtisan lens, much more than any other glass I own. My guess is that this is due to it being a preproduction model (an early one at that), and I assume that the firmware on the production version has rectified this problem; however, I cannot verify one way or the other. It’s important for me to point this out just in case it is an issue, but I hope it’s not. Most likely it’s no issue. It’s common for preproduction versions of gear to have problems that are partially or fully resolved by the time they’re released. It’s probably only a problem on my copy, which was an early model, and those being sold today have fast and accurate autofocusing, but I cannot state that with certainty. A side note is that the firmware for this lens is updated via a USB connection in the rear lens cap, but apparently requires a Windows operating system.

Is the TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 lens worth buying? Despite no aperture ring and the autofocus woes of my preproduction copy, this has been my most-used lens since it arrived at my doorstep. I have used it on both my Fujifilm X-E4 and X-T5, but mostly on the X-T5. I love the character that this lens gives to my pictures. I have shared some of these images on Fuji X Weekly and on my Instagram page, and I’ve had a lot of people inquire about the lens I used (much more than usual), and I had to respond with “I can’t tell you yet” (because I agreed not to talk about it). The way this lens renders seems to pair especially well with Fujifilm’s excellent JPEG output and my Film Simulation Recipes. It’s highly desirable. In my opinion, this lens is well worth the small price-tag. With that said, I would much prefer an aperture ring, and I want the lens flare that my copy produces, which might be different than the one they’re currently selling. I hope that TTArtisan will someday offer such a version.

*Fujifilm X-T5 + TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/5 + Reala Ace Recipe*

Pergear asked that I not show some of the pictures in this article that have the rainbow lens flare, which might not be so pronounced (if produced at all) on the final version. Some of my absolute favorite photographs captured with the TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF lens have this flare. I have so many examples of it, I could have shown it in every picture. Instead, I only included a handful of those images, with the hopes that TTArtisan will realize that this unique characteristic is desirable. If you agree, please leave a comment below saying so.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF:  Amazon
Fujifilm X-T5 in black:  Amazon  B&H  Moment
Fujifilm X-T5 in silver:  Amazon  B&H  Moment

Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using my preproduction version of the TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF lens on my Fujifilm X-T5:

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @f/11 + Vibrant Velvia Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/13 +* *The Rockwell Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/9 + The Rockwell Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/8 + The Rockwell Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/8 + Summer of 1960 Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/5 + Kodak Gold 200 Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/11 + Reala Ace Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/7.1 + Fujicolor Reala 100 Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/5.6 + Fujicolor Reala 100 Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/1.8 + Fujicolor NPS 160 Pulled Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/5 + Fujicolor Reala 100 Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/1.8 + Reala Ace Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/5 + Fujicolor Super HG v2 Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/4 + Kodak Gold 200 Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/2.8 + Reala Ace Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T5 & TTArtisan 35mm f/1.8 AF @ f/4.5 + Emulsion ’86 Recipe*

Creative Collective 053: Going Ultra-Wide for Dramatic Photographs

Posted on August 15, 2023 by Ritchie Roesch

*Panic Purchases* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Rokinon 12mm

Dramatic photographs are statement pieces that grab the viewer’s attention. There are several techniques that you could employ to capture dramatic pictures, including light, subject matter, and composition/point-of-view. In this article I will discuss a particular piece of gear that often delivers dramatic results: the ultra-wide lens.

New 27mm f/2.8 Pancake Alternative by TTArtisan

Posted on October 29, 2022 by Ritchie Roesch

*TTArtisan 27mm f/2.8 … photo courtesy of Pergear*

I’ve told you before that the Fujinon 27mm f/2.8 is my favorite lens. I have the new version with the aperture ring and weather-sealing—the old version is optically identical (and the autofocus is identical), but it lacks an aperture ring and weather-sealing and costs just a little more for some reason. While the “Mark II” 27mm f/2.8 is the better option, it can be a little difficult to find. Fujifilm has had a difficult time getting the lens to stores, and stores sell out pretty quickly after they receive them. A number of you have stated your frustration trying to get your hands on one. There is a new alternative, though: the TTArtisan 27mm f/2.8 Autofocus.

I’ve shot before with a different TTArtisan lens—the 35mm f/1.4—on a Nikon Zfc, and was actually impressed by the image quality. It was no Fujinon or Zeiss or anything like that, but it was noticeably superior to the Nikkor 28mm lens that came with that camera. I suspect that this one will be similar: deliver decent image quality, have character, be solidly-built, and cost a lot less. In fact, the MSRP is only $160 (or $150 if you buy direct from Pergear), which is very affordable for an autofocus lens. If you can’t find the Fujinon 27mm, or if you cannot afford the Fujinon lens, this seems like a good alternative to consider.

I believe that the TTArtisan 27mm f/2.8 is a little bigger than the Fujinon 27mm f/2.8, so it isn’t quite as pancake, but more like the Fujinon 18mm f/2 pancake. It has a rear-lens-cap USB connection for firmware updates, which I think is interesting. I’ve never used this lens personally to verify any of this, but maybe someday I will.

I personally wish that TTArtisan would have instead created a different focal length pancake lens—maybe that’s in the plans, who knows?—and I think a 23mm pancake or 50mm pancake or 12mm pancake would be nice options. For reasons that I don’t understand, there aren’t nearly enough good pancake options for Fujifilm cameras. I mean, a selling point of APS-C is the compact size (compared to full-frame), so why not offer more tiny lenses to take advantage of it? I do believe that competition is good, so I’m happy to see this TTArtisan lens as an option for Fujifilm photographers, and I hope they make more lenses that are similar in the future.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

TTArtisan 27mm f/2.8 Autofocus Amazon

Fujinon XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR Amazon B&H

Fujifilm Deals

Posted on November 22, 2021 by Ritchie Roesch

There are a few new Fujifilm deals that were announced today. A couple are worth noting, namely $400 off of the X-T3 and $1,500 off the GFX50R! If you’ve been considering getting into the GFX system, this might be your best opportunity. For those looking out for a deal (perhaps for holiday shopping), those Fujifilm items that are currently on sale can be found below.

Cameras:
Fujifilm X-T3 – Save $400 – B&H Amazon
Fujifilm X-T4 – Save $200 – B&H Amazon
Fujifilm X-T30 – Save $100 – B&H Amazon

Lenses:
Fujinon 23mm f/1.4 – Save $200 – B&H Amazon
Fujinon 50mm f/1 – Save $200 – B&H Amazon

GFX:
GFX50R – Save $1,500 – B&H Amazon

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Lens Review: Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R

Posted on March 3, 2021 by Ritchie Roesch

The Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R lens is the strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. This is a lens that I want to love because of its small size and very useful focal-length, but I don’t love it because its way overpriced and has a disappointing focus system. I’m getting a little ahead of myself, though; I have plenty that I want to discuss about the Fujinon 18mm f/2 before giving my conclusion.

This is one of two “pancake” lenses offered by Fujifilm; the other is the 27mm f/2.8. Whereas the 27mm is a true pancake, the 18mm f/2 is only sort-of one, as it’s a little on the large size for this category. Think of it more of a Japanese pancake than an American flapjack, or maybe it’s a short stack. The 18mm f/2 is compact glass for when you want a little less girth and weight, but it’s not quite as small as one might hope for.

In this lens are eight elements in seven groups with seven semi-rounded blades. You won’t get great sunstars. Bokeh is pretty good, although not something you’ll experience much because it’s a wide-angle lens. The 18mm focal-length is full-frame equivalent to 27mm. The minimum focus distance is about seven inches, which is pretty good. The maximum aperture is f/2 and the minimum is f/16, with 1/3-stop intermediate clicks. The lens accepts 52mm threaded filters.

The Fujinon 18mm f/2 lens is sharp in the center at all apertures. It’s slightly soft on the edges at all apertures, but more so when wide-open, so it’s best to stop down to at least f/2.8 or f/4 if you can. I didn’t notice any vignetting. There’s not much distortion, and I didn’t notice any chromatic aberrations; I wonder if it’s because the camera is correcting this—as you probably know, I shoot JPEGs, and I didn’t inspect the RAW files. Image quality from this lens is clearly Fujinon, and I’m quite happy with how it renders pictures.

This is one of Fujifilm’s oldest X-series lenses, and it shows. It’s in desperate need of a refresh. Autofocus is the slowest I’ve experienced in a Fujinon model, outside of macro lenses that have a long range to cycle through. It’s also the loudest. I found manual-focus, which is focus-by-wire, to be somewhat unpleasant. The focus system on this lens is disappointing, but ultimately it is sufficient for most situations, so you just have to put up with it. Hopefully at some point Fujifilm makes a new version with a better focus motor.

The 18mm f/2 is quite prone to lens flare, which you might love or hate depending on how you feel about it. Fujifilm does provide a lens hood that’s highly effective, but it adds significant length, which defeats the point of it being a pancake lens—with the hood it makes this lens the same size as the 16mm f2.8. I’m personally okay with the flare, so I don’t use the hood.

The Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R lens isn’t weather-sealed (which only matters if your camera is), it doesn’t have any image stabilization (which isn’t a big deal on a wide-angle lens), and it’s slow and loud compared to other Fujinon lenses. Yet it retails for $600! The only thing special about the 18mm f/2 is that it’s small and lightweight, which is why I bought it and why I plan to keep it, but I wouldn’t pay $600 for it.

If you can find one for a good price, it might be worth owning. Otherwise, there are better options to consider, including the 14mm f/2.8, 16mm f/2.8, 16mm f/1.4, 8-16mm f/2.8, 10-24mm f/4, 16-55mm f/2.8, 18-55mm f/2.8-f/4, 16-80mm f/4, and 18-135mm f/3.5-f/5.6. Heck, the 15-45mm f/3.5-f/5.6 and 16-50mm f/3.5-f/5.6 might even be better options! Pretty much any Fujinon lens that covers this or a similar focal length will have some advantages over the 18mm f/2. The one and only reason to buy the Fujinon 18mm f/2 lens is if you need a small pancake-like wide-angle lens to attach to your camera. If you need that, this lens is your best bet because it’s your only option.

Ah, but the pictures captured through this lens are quite nice, even if the experience of capturing them is less than ideal. That’s why I said this is the strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. You have to know this going into it, or you’ll likely be disappointed. If you can put up with the quirks and can get it for a good price, you’ll find glass capable of capturing beautiful images, and that’s what matters most. I don’t love the lens, but I do like it and plan to use it frequently.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R Amazon B&H

Example photographs captured with the Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R lens on a Fujifilm X-T30:

*Shallow Lake* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Calm Canal* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Farmington Bay Reeds* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Sky Reflections in the Water* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*International Fence* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Red Steel Pile* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Dirty Shore & Reflections* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Algae & Broken Reeds* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Puddle in the Path* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Still Water Reeds* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Seagull Over Reeds* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Wetlands Under Pastel Sky* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Structure Abstract* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Bucket in a Basket* – Layton, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Sidewalk Intersection* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Three Seagulls* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Tree & Reflection* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

*Dramatic Sky Over Shallow Lake* – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 & Fujinon 18mm f/2

Help Fuji X Weekly

Nobody pays me to write the content found on fujixweekly.com. There’s a real cost to operating and maintaining this site, not to mention all the time that I pour into it. If you appreciated this article, please consider making a one-time gift contribution. Thank you!

$2.00