Two or three weeks ago, Fujirumors reported that Fujifilm is working on a Film Era Dial that will be found on some upcoming camera. I made the false assumption that it must be the upcoming X-Pro, which is most likely the next X-series camera to be released (although it might not be), possibly early next year. I’m glad that I used words like “guess” and “suspect” and clarified that “I have absolutely zero inside information” because apparently my guess and suspicions were completely wrong. The camera that Fujifilm is going to put this new feature on, according to Fujirumors, is not an X-series model, but an Instax Evo camera.
Some of you just sighed with relief. You don’t want a Film Era Dial or even a Film Dial. Personally, I like the Film Dial. It’s not perfect, but Fujifilm has been working to improve it (and hopefully will continue to do so). I think the Film Era Dial could be a really cool concept if it’s done right. They could screw it all up and make it really cheesy, or they could do a great job with it and it becomes a beloved feature (or anything in-between). For now, it’s apparently not coming to the X-series, only to an Instax Evo model. Maybe it will be on the next X half, which is kind of a cross between Instax Evo and the X-series. It could someday find its way to the X-series, but apparently not yet. I’m probably in the minority of people who are a bit disappointed to hear this news.
Fujirumors just posted today that Fujifilm is working on “a dial that lets you choose an era-inspired look for your images.” This will be for some upcoming camera. It sounds like this new dial might be similar to the Film Dial, except instead of Film Simulations (and Film Simulation Recipes on FS1/FS2/FS3 for the X-E5 & X-T30 III), it will be aesthetics that mimic specific eras of photography, presumably something like 1950’s, 1980’s, etc.. So not a Film Dial, but a Film Era Dial.
My best guess is that this will be on the next X-Pro camera, which Fujifilm is working on. I suspect that this camera will be the next model that Fujifilm announces, and it will come early next year. This is simply the first of many rumors we can expect for the X-Pro4 (I’m predicting that it will be called X-Pro5) over the next few months. This is merely speculation, of course, and I have absolutely zero inside information. I do know that Fujifilm wants to do something unique and unexpected with the next X-Pro (they’ve said so a few times now), and this would certainly qualify as that.
I can only guess how the Film Era Dial might work, but it will likely be similar to the Film Dial on the X-E5. Perhaps it will have nine or ten or eleven “eras” plus an Off position. These eras, which will likely be divided by decades, will probably be similar to Recipes, except designed by Fujifilm and not customizable. In this way it could be more like Advanced Filters, which aren’t customizable—you get what you get—but probably more refined and sophisticated, something you’d definitely want to use (in other words: built-in—but not customizable—Recipes). Maybe it’s also a bit X half-ish, with the idea being that it’s super easy to get great retro-like looks straight-out-of-camera. If that’s all true, I’m disappointed to not have been invited to be a part of the creation process; however, I do trust that Fujifilm will do an excellent job with it.
So what does “Film Eras” look like on Fujifilm cameras? It can be different things, but I do have an idea. For example, Sepia prints were popular in the 1920’s; Faded Monochrome gives a nod to really old B&W prints; Vintage Kodachrome mimics an early version of Kodachrome film; Vintage Agfacolor has a 1950’s look; 1960’s Chrome resembles pictures found in magazines during that era; 1976 Kodak is similar to some Joel Meyerowitz photographs from the mid-’70’s; Kodacolor has a distinct ’80’s vibe; Kodachrome 64 was an extremely popular (and iconic) film in the 1990’s; Fujicolor Superia 800 has a 2000’s disposable-film-camera quality; Kodak Portra 400 v2 mimics a Portra 400 aesthetic, a popular film in the 2010’s; and the new Reala Ace film sim has been called the “negative for the new era” so it makes sense to use a Recipe like Fujicolor Film for the 2020’s. I could make probably four or five unique lists like this that demonstrates “photography through the decades” aesthetics using my different Film Simulation Recipes.
I like the general idea of a Film Era Dial, and if anyone can pull it off it’s Fujifilm. I’ll reserve my full judgement until it is released, presumably on the upcoming X-Pro5 early next year. I don’t anticipate it being perfect; the Film Dial isn’t perfect, but it is good, adding aesthetic versatility if you know how to get the most out of it (tune into SOOC Live this coming Monday, as this will be the topic of our conversation). I wonder if the Film Dial will be unique to fifth-generation cameras, and the Film Era Dial will be unique to sixth-generation models. Time will tell.
If you like the idea of the Film Era Dial, you don’t have to wait for it. Simply program into your C1-C7 Recipes for different decades. I gave you some ideas above; perhaps this could turn into a series of articles. Maybe I can give some specific recommendations for each era. What do you think? Is a Film Era Dial a good idea? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!
Fujirumors posted an article today entitled BREAKING: This Totally Unexpected Fujifilm Camera is Coming in 2025 – And I Know You Won’t Believe Me. I believe it and even expected it, because I’ve been saying it for over a year. If you regularly read Fuji X Weekly, you probably believe it, too, and might even have expected it yourself. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve predicted it over the last 14 months—probably a good handful. For some (including myself), this is not a surprise in the least.
In the third paragraph of my Fujifilm X-T50 review (published on May 16, 2024), I stated, “The X-T50 is not the successor to the X-T30 II, but a whole new (yet highly similar) line. Fujifilm plans to sell the X-T30 II alongside the X-T50, similarly to what they did with the X-T3 and X-T4 a few years back. This also means that there is a potential future successor to the X-T30 II, perhaps called the X-T30 III or X-T40; I don’t know that for sure, but I think it is a fair assumption. The main thing for you to know is that the X-T50 is not a replacement for any previous model, but a whole new camera.”
Just two months ago, in my article entitled My Hopes for the Fujifilm X-E5 (published on May 21st), I concluded with this: “My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall….” It looks like that guess was pretty much correct.
For those still scratching their heads, Fujirumors just leaked that the X-T30 II’s successor (which isn’t the X-T50) is coming sometime in 2025. And this is taking the Fujifilm community by surprise. Many people apparently assumed that the X-T50 was the X-T30 II’s successor, even though Fujifilm said from the get-go that it wasn’t. Fuji X Weekly might have been the only website that predicted the X-T30 III (or maybe they’ll call it X-T40, but I doubt it). I don’t have any inside information, I only took Fujifilm at their word, and followed the sequence of past releases to predict this outcome. It just made sense to me.
So what will the Fujifilm X-T30 III look like? I think it will be exactly the same as the X-T30 and X-T30 II (which was mostly just a firmware update to the X-T30), except with the X-Processor 5. In other words, it will have Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace, but otherwise will be pretty much identical to the X-T30 II. Some are predicting an X-T50 but with the 26mp sensor instead of 40mp, but I don’t think so, personally. There will be a price increase, because of inflation (and, in America, the tariffs). The X-T30 II was $900 in 2021, which is $1,070 today, so don’t be surprised if the X-T30 III is about $1,050-$1,100 USD for the body-only outside of America, and $1,300-$1,400 in the US due to tariffs. That’s just the new normal, I think.
The question that some will certainly ask is why does this camera need to exist. The X-M5 is the new entry-level model. The X-S20 is the hybrid PASM model underneath the X-H2/X-H2s. The X-E5 has been upgraded to a mid-tier camera. The X-T50 is also a mid-tier model. Where does the X-T30 III fit into that? I believe that it will be the lowest-tier non-PASM camera, underneath the X-T50 and X-T5. This line has been historically successful for Fujifilm. It offers a more affordable option for those who want an EVF. But… I think it will also be an indication of what’s to come very soon with the other models (aside from the X-E5 and X half): price increases (at least in America, maybe not worldwide). Other brands have already announced higher prices, and Fujifilm will be doing so soon, too, in my opinion.
Of course, I’ve been wrong about plenty of things before. For every one thing that I’ve predicted correct, I’ve predicted two or three completely incorrect. That’s the trouble with guessing the future (ask Robert Zemeckis). I cannot say with any level of certainty what the X-T30 II’s successor will be like, so my predictions should be taken with a large grain of salt. But the fact is that the X-T30 II’s successor is coming soon, and I’m not surprised by it.
After I published Why the Upcoming Fujifilm Half-Frame Camera is Genius last week, I had some further thoughts about what this camera may or may not be. Did I have it all wrong? What if the Xhalf isn’t what I am expecting? Perhaps it is an entirely different concept.
I’m not suggesting that the Xhalf won’t be a vertically orientated 20mp 1″ sensor camera, or that it won’t be able to capture diptychs (two images side-by-side), because that’s all true. And it will indeed be a compact fixed-lens camera. There are some things we know, but there’s also a lot that we don’t know, and are just speculating.
As I’ve thought about it, I wonder if video will even be integrated into the camera. After all, it will have a small rear LCD (orientated vertically) and an OVF (not an EVF), which doesn’t seem like an ideal configuration for videography. It will apparently have a mode where you cannot review your pictures until you’ve captured a whole simulated roll of film, which sounds like a photo-centric design with the intention of a film-like experience. So it might not have video capabilities, and—if so—this isn’t going to be a camera for TikTok content creators, as I speculated it would be. My guess is that it will have some capability to record video, but there is certainly the possibility that it won’t or that it will be quite limited, and, if that is true, I definitely got the concept wrong.
There’s also the menu. It will surely need to be simplified for the vertical screen, right? In other words, it might not have all of the features that are standard on other X-series models. I don’t know what exactly, but if the idea is simplicity and a film-like experience, the UI will certainly be unlike any X-series camera. I suspect that it won’t have all of the bells and whistles that we’re accustomed to on the latest models. Which bells and which whistles are excluded will be interesting to know, and depending on just how far Fujifilm goes with this, it could certainly cripple the camera. Or maybe they’ve come up with a clever solution, and this worry is for nothing.
Most X-series cameras are announced in conjunction with an X Summit. There are a few exceptions, but the list is small, and it’s been awhile. Supposedly, the Xhalf will be announced in a little over two weeks, on May 22; however, there has been no X Summit announcement. It’s possible that Fujifilm will announce an X Summit at any moment, but if this camera comes without an X Summit event, what does that indicate? I don’t want to read too much into this, but maybe Fujifilm views the Xhalf as a bridge between Instax and the X-series. Perhaps it will even offer connectivity to Instax printers, unlike most X-series models.
In other words, the Xhalf might be the least premium X-series camera in a long, long time (…if Fujifilm even considers it to be a part of the X-series). It’s probably more in the ballpark of an X10 or XF1 than X100VI or even the X70. It might be more along the lines of the Instax Evo Wide, except with a better sensor and without a built-in printer. Or maybe like a cross between a Fujifilm Clear Shot S AF and a Fujica Mini half-frame, except digital, and also a little like the Fujica 35-SE (or similar model). I’m just wondering out loud, as I certainly don’t know—I’m just playing devil’s advocate to last week’s article.
For certain, the upcoming camera will offer a divergent camera experience. It will be unique—not just in Fujifilm’s lineup, but in all of photography. Whether this camera turns out to be the “genius” model that I initially speculated, or a lower-tier iteration, I think either way it will be lots of fun.
Fujifilm recently teased this silhouette of the upcoming half-frame camera.
Fujifilm is about to change the way we think about cameras—with a twist that’s so obvious, you’ll wonder why no one did it sooner. A vertical half-frame digital camera, inspired by film classics but built for the social-media age. Here’s why this little camera might just be the most brilliant idea Fujifilm has had in years.
When I first heard rumors that Fujifilm was developing a digital half-frame camera with a 1″ sensor that is mounted vertically, plus a vertically-oriented LCD screen, I thought it could be interesting, but I didn’t really grasp the significance of it. The more I sat with the idea, the more I realized that this camera will be a game-changer. It’s a brilliant move that taps deep into both photographic tradition and modern needs. It’s a camera that looks back and forward at the same time, while firmly fitting in with current trends.
First, let’s talk about the sensor orientation. Instead of the typical horizontal orientation, the sensor itself is vertical. In today’s world, vertical is king for short-form video (Instagram Reels, TikToks, YouTube Shorts). Even websites and blogs are increasingly favoring vertical imagery—whether stills or video—because most people view them on their phones. Our cellphones have been teaching us to see vertically for over a decade. Fujifilm recognized an obvious truth: if a large segment of the population is shooting vertical most of the time, why not design a camera that’s naturally optimized for it? I think it’s just a matter of time before we see longer-form videos in the vertical format, and maybe even televisions and computer monitors orientated tall (or perhaps in a plus shape) in a few years. Vertical is the future, and the future is now; however, the tech industry has been a little slow to embrace this—perhaps because it upends 137 years of motion picture and nearly a hundred years of television norms.
But it goes deeper than just trendy vertical videos. This camera harkens back to the classic half-frame film cameras of the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80’s, such as the Canon Demi, Olympus Pen F, Konica Recorder, and many others. Just within the last couple of years, the Kodak H35N and Pentax 17 have been analog hits. These cameras shoot two vertical frames on a standard 35mm negative (hence the term “half-frame”), allowing photographers to get twice the number of exposures per roll. Diptychs—two frames that work together as a pair—encourage creativity, storytelling, and experimentation. Fujifilm is embracing this with their upcoming X-series camera. Digital diptychs will be an invitation to think differently, to see differently. It’s not just about creating one great shot; it’s about how two moments side-by-side can create greater meaning.
The elephant in the room is the sensor size. A 1″ sensor is not the same size as a half-frame of 35mm film; actually, APS-C is pretty much half of full-frame. A 1″ sensor is basically half the size of APS-C, so it could be thought of as half-frame compared to APS-C. I think the camera will be more the spirit of half-frame than the technical definition, which will drive some people nuts. While there are some current cameras with a 1″ sensor—such as the Sony RX100 VII—it’s not all that common nowadays, and might be thought of as less-than-capable. For diptychs and vertical videos, it will be more than enough, and I don’t think it will be a point of contention for most people. Plus, the smaller sensor size allows for a more compact design. In other words, it might be a camera you’ll actually take everywhere, and not collect dust because it’s inconvenient to carry.
With the sensor orientated vertical, it just makes sense that LCD screen will be vertical, too. No awkward wrist contortions needed when composing tall shots. No fighting against a UI that’s stuck thinking horizontal. Once again, Fujifilm is demonstrating that they understand how people actually shoot—obviously not everyone, but a large segment of the population, for sure. This will be an obvious camera for social media content creators considering an upgrade from their cellphones.
With the rumored ability to lock in a Film Simulation Recipe for a specified number of shots (probably 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72, but I don’t know for sure), this camera will provide an analog-like experience unlike any other. It reminds me of the “wrench” that Peter McKinnon mentioned a couple of years ago. It’s this blending of retro with modern that perhaps seems unnecessary, but might actually be refreshing. And cool.
Some might say this camera will be too niche, but I think it’s visionary. In a world flooded with generic lookalike cameras chasing megapixels and meaningless specs, Fujifilm is daring to make a model that’s fun, soulful, and vintage-yet-forward-thinking, that’s perfectly suited for how we share our lives today. When this camera is officially unveiled, it will become an instant classic, I’m confident in that prediction. It’s a genius move that is perfect for this new era of vertical-first content creation. Aside from that, it’s retro and pocketable, which are quite trendy right now.
Fujifilm teased a new upcoming camera on their social media accounts. Not much is known about it. The biggest clue is the title: Half the Size, Twice the Story. The camera appears to be quite small, perhaps similar to the Fujifilm X30, but maybe smaller than that—it could be even smaller than the X70. It’s hard to say from the teaser.
Interestingly, there appears to be a small film simulation screen (kind of like the X-Pro3, but shaped differently, and maybe with less information) on the rear. Looks pretty cool, from the little that can be seen.
There’s been talk for awhile now of a “half frame” model that’s essentially a digital version of the Pentax 17 half-frame 35mm film camera. I don’t know if this is that, or even what that means exactly, but it could be. And if it is, it will be a lot of fun. I don’t think anyone will use it as a professional camera (of course it could be, and someone will do so just to prove the point, I’m sure), but as an enjoyable carry-everywhere model, or as a first camera for your kids, it could be quite tempting. This is just speculation, obviously—not much is known, not even when it might be released.
And there’s also the question of availability in the United States. Word on the street is that Fujifilm is pausing shipments into America until the tariff stuff settles—I don’t know if that’s true or not, just something I’ve heard more than once, so it could be true. If it is true, I’m not certain if it will be for all gear or only some, or for how long, or if prices will be raised once resumed. This isn’t a political comment, so please, no political talk in the comments section (they will be removed). Availability of some Fujifilm products has been scarce over the last couple of years (ever since the X100V went viral roughly 30 months ago), and this will likely compound the issue in the USA, but maybe have the opposite effect elsewhere in the world. Whatever the new camera is, I’m highly interested, and I’m keeping my fingers crossed that it will be available in America whenever it is announced.
Purportedly, Fujifilm is about to shake up the medium-format world with their upcoming 100mp fixed-lens GFX camera: GFX100RF. This upcoming model, rumored to be priced around $5,000, will feature a high resolution 100mp sensor paired with a fixed 35mm f/4 lens (28mm full-frame-equivalent, or 18.5mm APS-C-equivalent). Apparently, it will be about the same size as an X-Pro model. While this might sound like a dream camera for some, others may wonder whether it’s actually a good value—will it even be worthwhile at that price point. Let’s talk about this.
I want to start with this disclaimer: I don’t have any inside information on the upcoming camera. Fujifilm hasn’t shared anything about it with me, not even if there is a camera forthcoming, or if any camera is forthcoming. I only know as much as the next person, and what I do know I read on Fujirumors. Patrick has a pretty solid track record, so there’s a good chance that everything he has shared about the camera is correct, but until it is announced by Fujifilm, nothing can be known with 100% certainty. In other words, anytime that we’re discussing rumors, it should be taken with a grain of salt. We will all know everything when it is announced in March, and, until then, it’s only speculation.
Some might see the upcoming Fujifilm GFX100RF camera as a fantastic value. Not all that long ago, a digital medium-format camera would set you back at least $10,000, if not $30,000 or even $60,000. When Pentax released the 50mp 645Z in 2014 at “only” $8,500, it shocked the camera world because it seemed to be impossibly inexpensive for what it was. Beginning in 2017, Fujifilm basically took things a step further, and in the process became the leader in medium-format, by offering the GFX50S and GFX50R for $6,500 and $4,500 respectively. Since then, prices have continued to come down while the capabilities of these cameras have increased.
The Fujifilm GFX100S II has an MSRP of $5,000. It has the same sensor and processor as the upcoming GFX100RF. A couple advantages of the GFX100S II are that it is an interchangeable-lens model, and it has IBIS; some disadvantages are that it is much bigger/heavier, it requires the purchase of a lens, and it is PASM (not the traditional Fujifilm tactile controls). Essentially, you exchange IBIS for a lens, and get a retro-styled body about the size of an X-Pro3. The most similar lenses in the GF lineup are the 30mm f/3.5 (closest focal-length) and 50mm f/3.5 (closest size), which cost $1,700 and $1,000 respectively. An argument can be made that the GFX100RF is an excellent value at “only” $5,000, considering that the lens is included.
The big advantage of the upcoming camera is, of course, size and weight, and the retro design. My speculation is that it will be the thinest ever digital medium-format body/lens combination, and maybe even the “smallest” (depending on exactly how one defines that). Comparisons will be made to the Hasselblad 907X (plus CFV 100C back) with the 45mm f/4 or 28mm f/4 lens, which is much more expensive at over $9,000 (interestingly, the Hasselblad does not have IBIS, and we’re talking about f/4 lenses…).
I think a lot of the complaints circling the internet about the upcoming GFX100RF are from those who were unlikely to buy the camera in the first place. There was always going to be an excuse. It doesn’t have IBIS. The maximum aperture is too small. It has a fixed lens. The cost is too much. If only the engineers had pulled off miracle after miracle after miracle, then they would purchase. But since the designers were limited to things like reality, what a stupid camera that nobody will buy! Of course, I disagree with that completely.
Oak Creek – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Nostalgia Negative
The lack of IBIS will deter some, no doubt. There’s a myth that more megapixels make camera shake more noticeable, but that’s simply not true. A blurry picture is blurry no matter the resolution, and a sharp picture is sharp no matter the resolution. The same rules for achieving sharp photos apply exactly the same to 10mp as 100mp. But that doesn’t mean IBIS isn’t a useful feature that’s worthwhile to have. Some see it as essential, and the lack of it on the GFX100RF will prevent them from purchasing; however, I don’t see this as a big issue for most potential buyers.
Also, the f/4 lens is not especially exciting. This maximum aperture is not uncommon on GFX lenses, and produces a depth-of-field similar to f/2 on APS-C. People looking at it from an APS-C or full-frame perspective might find it shocking, but those in the medium-format world will see it as pretty normal, similar to how f/2 is common for the X-series.
The proper take, in my opinion, is that this camera isn’t for everyone, or even for most. The GFX system as a whole is not for everyone, or even for most. The vast majority of photographers don’t need a GFX camera. Some do, and it is available for them. Some don’t, yet enjoy the system anyway. For the majority, the X-system is a better option, in terms of value, enjoyment, size, and even capabilities. It’s not “trash” or “dumb” just because you personally don’t need it, or because it doesn’t have all of the specs that you wished it would, or because it is priced above what you can reasonably pay for a new camera. I think it’s ok to say, “That camera will be nice, but it’s not for me.”
So, then, who will the GFX100RF be for? First, it will be compelling for those who want a compact and lightweight medium-format camera. The size/weight aspect alone will make it desirable. This camera will be great for roadtrips and exploring, something that the other GFX models are not especially ideal for. I suspect that a significant group of GFX owners will buy it as a second camera for this purpose. Second, it will be for those who prefer retro styling and traditional tactile controls. The only other retro GFX camera is the 50R, which is long-discontinued and approaching seven-years-old. While that camera was considered a bit of a sales flop, it has since gained a cult-like following. Retro for Fujifilm isn’t just about trendy styling, it’s about functionality and fun. Third, it will be seen by some as the long-overdue and long-hoped-for successor to the Fujifilm X70, which has grown in popularity over the last several years. The upcoming camera is certainly not a direct followup to the X70, but I think there are enough similarities that some will see it as a spiritual successor nonetheless. Fourth, it will be seen as a larger-sensor X100-like camera, so some of the hype of the X100VI will carry over to the GFX100RF. Fifth, it will serve as a gateway into GFX. The X100-series has been a lot of people’s introduction to Fujifilm; likewise, the GFX100RF will be some people’s first GFX camera. This is because it’s an all-in-one model, and no further investment is needed to get started. It’s a way to dip your toes into the pool before deciding if you want to jump all the way in. Between those five groups, I suspect that sales will be strong, but only time will tell just how well it does.
I really hope for conversion lenses—both wide and telephoto—like the X100-series has. I highly doubt that the WCL-X100 and TCL-X100 will work on it (although it would blow my mind if they somehow did), but something similar should be made for the GFX100RF. A 0.9x wide-converter (25mm full-frame-equivalent, or 16.5mm APS-C-equivalent) or 0.8x wide-converter (22mm full-frame-equivalent, or 14.5mm APS-C-equivalent), and a 1.4x teleconverter (39mm full-frame-equivalent, 26mm APS-C-equivalent), would make the camera much more compelling. If these two conversion lenses were $500 or less each, and a compact three-lens “system” was possible for only $6,000, that would make it seem like a better bargain.
While some are suggesting that the price will cause the upcoming Fujifilm GFX100RF to be a bust, I really don’t think that will be the case; however, GFX is a niche line, and sales figures will never approach that of the X-series. It won’t sell nearly as many copies as the X100VI, or X-M5, or X-T5, etc.. But will it prove to be profitable? I’m pretty confident that it will. And if it is, I’m hopeful that it will convince Fujifilm to begin work on the GFX100R, a long-overdue successor to the GFX50R. If this camera does well, it might bring with it a whole new era of retro-style medium-format cameras.
Yellow Brush, Pink Sand – White Sands NP, NM – Fujifilm GFX100S II + 80mm f1.7 – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired
There’s been a lot of discussions about the rumored upcoming Fujifilm GFX100RF, which might get announced next month. Supposedly, it will be a compact 100mp medium-format fixed-lens camera similar to the X100-series and about the size of an X-Pro3. It won’t have IBIS, and the lens will be 35mm f/4, which are major points of contention for some. I figured that this might be a good opportunity to explore if those two design choices will be crippling for the camera, or if it is much ado about nothing.
I don’t have any inside information on the upcoming camera. Fujifilm hasn’t shared anything about it with me, not even if there is a camera forthcoming. I only know as much as the next person, and what I do know I read on Fujirumors. Patrick has a pretty solid track record, so there’s a good chance that everything he has shared about the camera is correct, but until it is announced by Fujifilm, nothing can be known with 100% certainty. In other words, anytime that we’re discussing rumors, it should be taken with a grain of salt.
Personally, I’m really excited for the GFX100RF. I believe that an X100-like GFX camera is going to be a major success for Fujifilm. While I don’t anticipate it being as viral as the X100VI, I do think it will have strong demand. It’s also about time that Fujifilm offers a GFX camera with manual tactile controls (is not PASM). The only other one is the long-discontinued GFX50R. If the GFX100RF is a big success, I bet that Fujifilm will begin work on a long-hoped-for GFX50R successor. If sales of the GFX100RF turn out to be disappointing, I don’t anticipate a retro-styled GFX camera for a long time, if ever. In my opinion, this is a crucial release, a lot hinges on it.
Fujifilm GFX100S II & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/4 – PRO Negative 160C
The upcoming GFX100RF will essentially be the digital version of the Fujifilm GA645W, a fixed-lens 120 film camera from the 1990’s. The GA645W has a 45mm f/5.6 lens, which is 25mm full-frame-equivalent, and with a depth-of-field similar to f/3.2. The GFX100RF will have a 35mm f/4 lens, which is 28mm full-frame-equivalent, and with a depth-of-field similar to f/3.2. It’s not quite as wide as the GA645W, but pretty close. The Fujifilm X70, with its 18.5mm (28mm full-frame-equivalent) lens, might also be considered comparable.
Some people have said that f/4 is much too small for a maximum aperture on the upcoming GFX camera, since f/4 is not especially impressive. Unfortunately, a larger maximum aperture lens would require the camera to be bigger and heavier. Would an f/2.8 lens be nice? For sure, yes. But, at what cost? I’m sure Fujifilm was faced with a lot of difficult choices as they developed the prototype, and as they weighed the pros and cons, they made what they felt were the best decisions. So we have f/4, which is not uncommon for GFX. I count six GF lenses in the current lineup with a maximum aperture of f/4, plus two at f/3.5, and four with a maximum aperture smaller than f/4. Only five GF lenses have a maximum aperture larger than f/3.5. The decision to go with f/4 should not be all that surprising, and I doubt many—if any—in the GFX world were shocked by it.
Fujifilm GFX100S II at ISO 6400 & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/4 – Kodak Tri-X 400
GFX cameras are good for high-ISO photography. It’s kind of a paradox of digital medium-format: it’s good that it’s better at high-ISOs, because you’re going to need it, since the maximum apertures are typically not as large as smaller sensor formats. There are pros and cons to everything. Unsurprisingly, you’re going to find tradeoffs. It is what it is.
Not all Fujifilm cameras have in-body-image-stabilization (IBIS), but most of the GFX models do (only the original two don’t). There are a couple of situations where IBIS is especially helpful, plus a few where it can be nice to have. One is video. IBIS is not a requirement for video, but it is particularly convenient when handholding without a gimbal. Another is telephoto lenses. The longer the lens, the more useful IBIS is. Low-light situations without a tripod is an example of when it can be nice to have. For many circumstances, IBIS is not particularly necessary, especially for wide-angle lenses. Some who say that they need IBIS might discover that their photography wouldn’t suffer if it was turned off—they’re not giving themselves enough credit for how well they can hold still.
Fujifilm GFX100S II at 1/20 & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/16 – Kodak Tri-X 400
The rule of thumb is that, without IBIS, whatever the focal length of the lens is (or in the case of Fujifilm cameras, the full-frame-equivalent focal length), the minimum shutter speed should be a similar number. For example, if the X-series lens is 16mm, which is 24mm full-frame-equivalent, the slowest hand-held shutter speed is around 1/25. If the lens is 90mm, which has a full-frame-equivalent focal length of 135mm, the slowest hand-held shutter speed is around 1/125. With good techniques, you can often get a sharp picture with even slower shutter speeds. For the GFX100RF, with its 35mm lens (28mm full-frame-equivalent), the slowest hand-held shutter speed will be about 1/30.
There’s a myth floating around that IBIS is more necessary with 100mp sensors than with lower-resolution sensors. That’s simply not true. More resolution does not equal a bigger need for IBIS in order to get sharp photographs. A 100mp sensor has no more or less of a need for IBIS than a 12mp sensor. A sharp photo is a sharp photo no matter the resolution, and a blurry image is blurry no matter the resolution. The myth is false, and not based on reality.
Fujifilm GFX100S II at 1/25 & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/9 – Superia Negative
Massive crop from the above photo
I put all of this to the test yesterday. Obviously, I don’t have access to a GFX100RF. I’m sure some people have it in their hands right now, but I don’t. I do own a GFX100S II and a Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 lens (which doesn’t have OIS). So I turned IBIS off. I kept the aperture at f/4 or smaller. I did my best to simulate the upcoming camera, although the GFX100S II is much larger and heavier, and with PASM. The 30mm lens is 24mm full-frame-equivalent (16mm on X-series), so a little wider than what the GFX100RF will have.
The f/4 maximum aperture wasn’t a major issue. Wide-angle photography is not known for shallow depths-of-field. While it is possible to achieve a shallow depth-of-field, I don’t anticipate this being a major selling point of the camera. I imagine that “f/8 and be there” will be a much more typical shooting philosophy. In low-light situations, I did have to increase the ISO higher than I would have had to if I had used my X-series gear, but thankfully the camera does well with high-ISO.
I tested handholding the camera at slow shutter speeds. Unsurprisingly, I consistently achieved sharp photographs at 1/25, with probably a 90% success rate. At 1/20, the success rate was closer to 60%. At 1/15, the success rate was probably 30%. I was able to get one sharp photo at 1/13. Because the lens on the GFX100RF will be a little less wide-angle, the shutter speed should be increased slightly. I suspect that it will be roughly a 90% rate at 1/30, 60% at 1/25, 30% at 1/20, and maybe 10% at 1/15. Obviously, results will vary from person-to-person, depending on your technique and ability to hold still.
Fujifilm GFX100S II at 1/13 & Fujinon GF 30mm f/3.5 at f/4 – Superia Negative
Massive crop from the above photo
While IBIS would have been a nice feature, I don’t think its exclusion is a major issue. I’m sure it was a compromise in order to keep the size, weight, and price down. This camera—like every other camera that’s ever been made—is not for everyone. It has advantages and disadvantages. It will be especially great for some situations and use-cases, and not so much for others. Personally, I plan to buy it; however, probably not on the announcement day. Like the GFX100S II, I’ll have to save up and probably sell some gear in order to afford it. I think it’s going to be a lot of fun, so I’m excited to try it someday when the opportunity comes.
I’ve had several people ask me what my opinions are of the upcoming Fujifilm GFX100RF fixed-lens X100-like GFX camera, which will supposedly be announced in the first quarter of 2025. Apparently, according to Fujirumors, the camera will be about the size of an X-Pro, have the 100mp GFX sensor, a 35mm (28mm full-frame-equivalent) f/4 lens, and will not have IBIS. That’s all that they’ve reported so far.
I don’t currently own any GFX cameras. They’re outside of my budget, are large and heavy compared to the X-series, and I think my use-case for one would be fairly limited. But, something like the GFX100RF would be interesting to me because the size and weight are likely to be less than typical GFX gear, and probably less expensive than a GFX100S II plus a lens. It would be a good way to dip my toes into GFX without having to buy a whole new system, or lug around something large and heavy.
One criticism that the camera is likely to receive is the lack of IBIS, but I think not having IBIS is just fine for a camera like this. First, outside of video and low-light situations, IBIS is really unnecessary for wide-angle lenses. Second, it adds size, weight, and cost, so its exclusion might actually be beneficial. Third, I think the whole “you need IBIS on 100mp because you can see even the smallest blur” argument is overstated. On this camera, IBIS would be occasionally nice to have, but far from essential, so it doesn’t bother me that the GFX100RF will apparently not have it.
The lens choice will probably be debated for a long time. Since fixed-lens cameras are stuck at whatever focal-length they are, you have to really like what it is. The 35mm lens on a GFX is like 18mm on APS-C (think Fujifilm X70 and Ricoh GR), or 28mm on full frame (think Leica Q3). That’s obviously a very popular focal-length, but it’s not for everyone. I personally prefer less wide-angle lenses most of the time (the X100VI, for example, is sometimes too wide for me). I completely understand the focal length choice for the GFX100RF; however, I kind of wish it was more like 50mm (40mm full-frame-equivalent), but that’s just my preference, and probably not what would be most desired by the majority of potential buyers.
And let’s not forget the maximum aperture of “only” f/4. That’s not an impressive maximum aperture, but also not unusual for medium-format. A larger maximum aperture would require a larger and heavier (and more expensive) lens, which would defeat the purpose of the GFX100RF. Back in 2021 I talked about this a bit: while GFX has a potentially smaller depth-of-field and better low-light capabilities, the fact that the maximum apertures are often smaller means that you oftentimes can’t fully realize those advantages. It’s a catch-22. Although f/2.8 would have been nice, f/4 as a maximum aperture is completely unsurprising to me, and probably required some engineering magic to even make that work.
We will have to wait a few more months to really know what the GFX100RF camera will be like, but what I can tell you is that this is the most excited I have been for a GFX model in a very long time. I need to prepare now—make room in both my budget and in my camera bag—for when it is announced. I’m sure, like the X100VI, if you’re not quick to order, there will be a wait to get your hands on one, as I’m pretty sure that this will be a popular camera.
Well, apparently Ricoh will not be announcing a GR IV anytime soon, according to Pentax Rumors. Additionally, the supposed GR IV Monochrome camera will likely never happen.
When Fujirumors reported it last week, I suggested that the news should be taken with a grain of salt. It just didn’t make sense to me. Not because these cameras wouldn’t be massively successful or that I wouldn’t be personally interested, but because Pentax Rumors didn’t report it first, and the GR III and GR IIIx are selling very well, so there should be no eagerness from the brand to replace them.
Pentax doesn’t update their lineup as often as other manufacturers. I think that’s good, and that camera companies—including Fujifilm—discontinue models much too quickly. A normal production lifespan should be four-to-five years, then, when the next generation is released, it’s a notable refresh. With quickly advancing digital technology and stiff competition, it can be tough to wait that long, so maybe don’t listen to me; however, I think replacing cameras every two or three years (sometimes less) is just difficult to sustain and seemingly unnecessary.
I don’t believe there is any need for Ricoh to replace the GR III anytime soon, as long as they continue to offer Kaizen firmware updates to keep it fresh. Same for the Fujifilm models in the current lineup that are getting older, such as the X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, and X-T5. There’s been talk within the community recently about successors, but there’s no need for Fujifilm to release them anytime soon. I would suggest 2026, personally, or maybe even 2027. That’s probably an unpopular opinion, but I’d like to see Fujifilm manufacture models for more than just a couple years before discontinuing them. I don’t mind that an X-Pro4 hasn’t been announced yet, but it’s too bad that the X-Pro3 was discontinued. Ditto for the X-E5 and X-E4. The X-E4 should still be being manufactured right now, since it was discontinued with such a large demand and long backorder list.
I think we reached a point awhile ago where we can keep our cameras for many years and they’re still excellent and not obsolete. Obviously that’s a tough position for manufacturers, because perhaps consumers aren’t buying as many copies since they’re waiting longer to upgrade. My opinion is that if camera makers design and release desirable models—maybe unconventional yet intriguing or exciting cameras—it will drive sales. The Ricoh GR III and Fujifilm X100VI are both excellent examples of this. Neither are cameras that you really need, but they’re both ones that a lot of people want. They are desirable because they’re fun, and not just soulless tools packed with the latest technical advances. Fujifilm—perhaps more than any brand—is good at making those types of cameras. It’s really fueled their success, and will continue to do so well into the future.
This comes from Fujirumors, and not Pentax Rumors, so I’m not sure how much salt needs to be taken with it. On the one hand, Fujirumors has a reputation of accuracy; on the other hand, you’d expect it to break on Pentax Rumors first. One the one hand, the GR III series is five-years-old now (approaching six), so it’s pretty old for a still-in-production digital camera and very logical that an update is imminent; on the other hand, Ricoh has done a good job of keeping it fresh with firmware updates, and demand for this camera is still sky high. I don’t think Ricoh “needs” to release a GR IV, but it would sell like hotcakes if they did.
Why am I talking about this on Fuji X Weekly? For starters, I have Recipes for Ricoh GR cameras, so this is an excellent excuse for a shameless plug. If this camera does indeed come, I will buy it. If a B&W-only version comes later, I’ll buy that, too. GR cameras are great because they are so small. They’re more pocketable than Fujifilm, which makes them excellent for travel or everyday carry. I don’t think they’re as fun (or quite as good) as Fujifilm cameras, but for casual photography, they can still be quite fun (and good). Which brings me to this: Fujifilm should fast-track the long-overdue X70 successor, presumably called X80.
The X70 was Fujifilm’s closest competitor to the Ricoh GR. It has traditional tactile manual controls—one aspect of what makes Fujifilm special—and Fujifilm’s excellent Film Simulations. An X80 would be immensely popular, and its exclusion from the X-series lineup is a missed opportunity. I hope that it is in Fujifilm’s plans, and if it’s not, I would encourage them to add it to the plans as quickly as possible. Many of us are eager for an X70 successor. And also for a B&W-only camera (maybe called “Acros Edition”), perhaps in an X100 or X-Pro body.
According to Fujirumors, Fujifilm is working on a new camera that will have a sensor size never before used by Fujifilm. I have no idea what that means, but I thought it might be fun to speculate what some of the possibilities are. Who knows if this is an X-series camera… it could be GFX. It could be a digicam or something like the XP80 waterproof camera. It could be Instax, since they have the EVO and PAL models. It could be something else entirely. For the sake of this article, I will assume that it is X-series; however, it very well might not be. I think this is one of those times where it’s best to keep expectations in check and not get your hopes up too high. Still, it can be fun to guess.
My very first thought is that it could be an X30-like successor—perhaps called X50—with a 1″ sensor. The Fujifilm X30 had a tiny 2/3″ 12mp X-Trans II sensor, but was still a good compact zoom, and is fun to use even in 2024. While a successor would need to be significantly different, I do believe that if it has a 1″ 20mp X-Trans V sensor, a 9mm to 37mm (24mm to 100mm full-frame-equivalent) f/2-4 zoom lens, IBIS, EVF, and retro tactile controls (no PASM, please), it will do quite well. There is a renewed interest in these types of cameras right now. Alternatively, a fixed-focal-length wide-angle option could be good, too.
Another idea would be to use the sensor found in the latest GoPro models. It has a tiny 1/1.9″ 27mp sensor with an unusual (almost square) 8:7 aspect ratio. The benefit of the unusual sensor shape is it allows for vertical videos without having to tilt the camera sideways, so obviously it would be a video-centric model, perhaps in the action camera realm. Most likely this would not technically be an X-series model, but it is possible that Fujifilm could use an X-Trans array. I don’t think this is a likely option, unless Fujifilm has thought of some way to stand out in what is already a crowded scene.
I doubt that Fujifilm has any interest in Micro-4/3. I think that MFT is too close to APS-C that they would only compete against themselves; aside from that, MFT is basically a declining market. Still, it is possible that an X100-like or X70-like compact fixed-lens MFT camera is in the works, I just see it as highly unlikely.
An intriguing option that I’ve suggested a couple of times (first in 2019, actually) is APS-H. There aren’t a lot of APS-H cameras anymore, but it used to be more common. Canon made some, as did Sigma. Since APS-H is about 15% larger than APS-C, not all APS-C lenses cover the entire frame. Sigma’s solution was to automatically crop to APS-C for the lenses without full coverage, and I would suggest that Fujifilm take the same approach. While some Fujifilm lenses will fully cover APS-H, some—the majority, actually—won’t; for those that don’t, the camera would automatically crop to APS-C.
The reason why Fujifilm might do this—and the camera that Fujifilm might do this for—is XPan on the future X-Pro4 (or maybe called X-Pro5). Where APS-C lenses struggle to cover APS-H are the corners, so the not-fully-covered lenses would be just fine for the XPan aspect-ratio, since the corners are cropped out. The roughly 50mp APS-H sensor would produce roughly 27mp XPan images. For lenses without full coverage with the 3:2 aspect ratio, you’d still get a 40mp APS-C photo; however, for the lenses with full coverage, you’d get the full 50mp-ish picture.
The only other option I can think of that makes sense is perhaps a full-frame X100-like camera. I don’t believe that Fujifilm has any interest in creating a new lens mount, so I would be completely shocked if Fujifilm made any interchangeable-lens full-frame models. Fujifilm would mostly be competing against themselves, and would undercut both their X and GFX lines; aside from that, the full-frame market is quite crowded and highly competitive. But, a premium fixed-lens full-frame camera might sell very well. Fujifilm would have to do something to differentiate it from the X100VI so that they aren’t directly competing against each other, and I have no doubts that they can.
If I were to bet on what it will be, my guess is none of these, that it’s not an X-series camera. If it is in the X-series, I think the top odds are that it is a 1″ sensor compact camera of some sort. An APS-H X-Pro with the XPan aspect ratio would be super cool, but unlikely in my opinion. With the massive demand for the X100VI, a full-frame version could be a huge sales success. Eventually we will know for sure, but for now we can only speculate, and most of those guesses will turn out to be wrong. Still, it’s fun to dream.
According to Fujirumors, the “camera line that most of us thought axed” that Fujifilm will be reviving is the X-M series. Apparently it will be called X-M5 and will be released sometime before the end of the year—September and November are a couple of months that Fujifilm likes to use for announcements, so maybe then. Nothing else is known at this time.
For those who don’t remember, the X-M1 was a short-lived camera near the beginning of the X-series that wasn’t particularly successful. It was unusual in that it had an X-Trans I sensor paired with an X-Trans II processor. It was a predecessor to the X-A line (the X-A1 had an identical body), and positioned lower than the X-E series. While it had a rangefinder look, it was given a PASM dial and didn’t have a viewfinder.
The X-M1 was released in the summer of 2013, right after Fujifilm began rolling out X-Trans II cameras. They also announced the nearly identical X-A1 just a few months afterwards. Those who were more familiar with the X-series and cameras in-general opted for the X-E1 or (a few months later) X-E2 because the X-E1 line was better (build quality, EVF, etc.), while those who were unfamiliar opted for the X-A1 instead because it was cheaper and the advantage of the X-M1 wasn’t obvious or well communicated. The X-M series was axed about a year later, but supplies lasted for another year due to unsold inventory.
While the upcoming camera will be called X-M5, I’m not sure what might be similar or dissimilar compared to the X-M1. I have some guesses, but it’s pure speculation. I have some suggestions for Fujifilm, but it might be too late in the design process to be implemented; however, I’ll give them anyway. I think the X-M5 is actually a smart move because Fujifilm is desperately missing a budget-friendly option for those who wish to get into the X-series but don’t have a ton to spend.
If I were Fujifilm, I would design it with a rangefinder-like shape that’s not too dissimilar to the X100VI and X-E4. In other words, it should look like the X-M1 to a large degree. I think they would be smart to keep the size down as much as possible—in fact, make the X-M5 the smallest interchangeable-lens X-series camera ever produced. Personally, I would ditch the PASM dial and use a shutter knob—the X-H series wen’t from non-PASM to PASM, so no reason X-M can’t go the other route. I doubt that it will have IBIS, unless the idea is not to keep the price down—an X-M5 with IBIS will likely be at least $900-$1,000 for the body alone, an X-M5 without IBIS should be in the $700-$800 range.
I would use the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor paired with the X-Processor V (like the X-S20, which also parallels the X-M1) and the old NP-W126S battery. Because of the small body size and heat dispersion issues, the camera will likely need some performance limitations to prevent it from overheating, which will simultaneously differentiate it from more premium (a.k.a. expensive) models. It won’t likely have an EVF, but it should have a tilting screen similar (identical?) to the one on the X-T50; however, if they do choose to add IBIS, don’t be surprised if it has a flippy screen like the X-S20. I would hope that Fujifilm would give it C1-C7 custom presets, but the X-M1 didn’t, so it’s possible that the X-M5 won’t either; however, that would be a mistake if they did—perhaps just C1-C4 if they feel the need to limit it (please give it C1-C7, though).
It seems like a safe assumption that the X-M5 will sit below the (discontinued) X-E4, eventual future X-E5, and the X-T30 II as Fujifilm’s low-budget base-level camera. Since Fujifilm discontinued both the X-A and X-T000 lines a few years back, there hasn’t been a good option for those on a tight budget to get into the X-series, except to hope for a good deal in the used market. I cannot tell you how many times people have asked me for advice on purchasing an inexpensive Fujifilm camera, but there just aren’t any options for brand-new bodies (the X-T30 II being the closest, currently). With the X-M5, there might finally be an inexpensive camera to recommend.
Fujirumors is reporting that Fujifilm is in the process of “reviving a camera line that most of us thought axed.” According to Fujirumors, the camera could be released anytime within the next six months. It’s always exciting when new gear is on the horizon, and it’s fun to speculate what it might or might not be. But, until it is actually released, it’s hard to know anything for certain, and so all speculation should be taken with a huge grain of salt.
The idea of a camera line revival made me consider which discontinued camera series could possibly be resurrected (apparently it isn’t the GFX50R). Over the years various series have become defunct, typically (but not always) due of disappointing sales figures. There are a number of options, so let’s briefly consider each.
My biggest hope is for an X70 successor, likely called X80. The X70 was Fujifilm’s closest competitor to the Ricoh GR series. It’s more-or-less a smaller and more wide-angle and less premium (a.k.a. more affordable) X100-series camera. Supposedly the X70 was discontinued (in 2016) because Sony suddenly stopped manufacturing the 16mp sensor found inside it, and the higher megapixel X-Trans sensors were too hot for such a small body, which prevented a successor from happening; perhaps they’ve finally figured out the heat issue (X-Trans IV sensor combined with X Processor 5?). I’ve been asking for an X70 successor for several years now, and with the popularity of Ricoh GR and other compact cameras, it seems like a no-brainer. I hope this is what’s coming, but it definitely might not be.
There are a few cameras that it could theoretically possibly be, but I’d be extremely shocked if it was. An X-S2, for example, which would be a DSLR-shaped fixed-lens super-zoom small-sensor Bayer+PASM followup to the X-S1, is not likely. I’m pretty certain that an S4 Pro is not coming, as the S3 Pro was built inside a Nikon DSLR. I don’t think an X-A30, a stripped down Bayer successor to the X-A20, is on the horizon, either.
Kodak (or, really, JK Imaging using the Kodak brand name) is selling cheap point-and-shoots like hotcakes right now; while a followup to the XF1 might seem strange, maybe it would actually be genius. If this is the upcoming camera, it would be a highly unexpected move, but one that might actually pay off and even possibly return this style to the mainstream. With the popularity of digicams right now, an XF2 isn’t completely out of the realm of possibilities; however, the odds seem pretty slim that this is it.
Perhaps an X40 is the upcoming camera: a pocket-sized retro-styled zoom with an EVF. There’s definitely an interest in an X30 successor—I’ve heard from at least a handful of people who would really like to see one—but I’m not sure if there is enough global demand for it to be worthwhile for Fujifilm; however, I would buy one if they made it. There is certainly a chance, albeit a small one, that an X40 is coming soon.
Kind of in-between an XF2 and X40 could be an XQ3, a followup to the XQ2. I’m very doubtful that Fujifilm will make any more small-sensor X-Trans cameras; however, if they produced an XQ3 (or X40) with a 20mp 1″ sensor, that would be intriguing (outside of the XF2, I don’t think Fujifilm should go any smaller than a 1″ sensor).
I’d actually be quite surprised if they released any new X series cameras with a sensor smaller than APS-C. In all probability, whatever camera Fujifilm is working on is an APS-C model, and not one with a tiny sensor. There are several options that I believe are much more likely than the XF2, X40 or XQ3.
The XF10 was the low-budget Bayer+PASM version of the X70, and it was a bit of a flop. However, with the popularity of Ricoh GR cameras right now, it wouldn’t be surprising if Fujifilm is working on a (hopefully significantly improved) successor, likely called the XF20. While I would much prefer an X80, I wouldn’t be against an XF20, if that’s what it ends up being.
That’s it for the fixed-lens options! Let’s take a look at some possible interchangeable-lens cameras that the upcoming model could possibly be. Fujifilm is supposedly working on a future X-E5 that is not this unknown camera, so I won’t discuss the X-E series in this article.
The X-A line used to be a top seller for Fujifilm, especially in Asian markets. These cameras were low-budget Bayer+PASM models that were not actually manufactured by Fujifilm, but contracted out to a 3rd party for assembly. The last one was the X-A7, which didn’t sell particularly well, and the line was discontinued. It’s possible that Fujifilm will revive this series with an X-A8, and maybe even manufacture it in-house.
Similarly, the X-T000 line was a low-budget Bayer+PASM series not manufactured by Fujifilm. It was basically an X-A camera but in an SLR shape (instead of rangefinder) and with an EVF. It’s unlikely that Fujifilm would revive both the X-A and X-T000 series, but they could bring back one of the two, and if it’s the X-T000 line, the camera would likely be called X-T300.
Last—but far from least—is the X-M2. I think the upcoming camera is more likely to be an X-M1 successor than an X-A8 or X-T300. The X-M1 was basically an X-A1 with an X-Trans sensor; the X-M2 would be a low-budget X-E like camera (but cheaper, with a PASM dial, and without an EVF), utilizing the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor. Fujifilm is desperately missing an affordable base-level camera that allows those on a tight budget to get into the system, and an X-M2 could serve that role. A brown faux-leather version would be quite nice.
If Fujifilm is indeed reviving a once-defunct camera series, it could be any of these (or maybe one that I overlooked—who knows?). There’s not a lot that can be gleaned from this exercise, other than it’s likely to be a more affordable camera, which is great—there aren’t currently a lot of options right now if you don’t have much to spend. My personal preference would be for an X80 (I’d be first in line to buy it!), but the XF20 would be ok if that’s what it ends up being. I think an X-A8, X-T300, or (especially) an X-M2 are also strong possibilities. Basically, we know very little, and it could be just about anything.
Which of these cameras would you be most interested in? Let me know in the comments!
Let me apologize right up front for the slowdown in articles lately. I’ve been really busy the last few weeks, and especially the last two weeks, and particularly the last handful of days. I’m hopeful that the chaos will calm down soon—perhaps in another week—and I can get back to publishing the amount and quality of content that you are used to seeing on Fuji X Weekly.
Anyway, Fujifilm just released a teaser video ahead of their May 15/16 X Summit in Sydney (10 PM Pacific, 1 AM Eastern). From the video, it appears like they’re going to announce a camera and lens. It definitely looks intriguing. I might have to catch the X Summit the morning after because it is so late here in America. It’s only seven days away, which means we’ll know all of the details by this time next week.
I browsed Fujirumors today, to catch up on the latest buzz. I found two articles that I want to briefly comment on. First, Fujifilm apparently is working on an X100-like GFX model (no PASM, please!), which might possibly be released sometime next year. Second, Fujifilm apparently has began the initial work on a potential digital X-Pan camera to be released in 2028. I don’t know if there’s any truth to either of those, and even if there is, there’s plenty of time for Fujifilm to switch directions. However, if there is any kernel of truth, my response is: heck, yeah! I’d buy both. Take my money, Fujifilm!
I think both of those potential future cameras qualify as “wow” products, which Fujifilm talked about a couple years ago. If they are indeed in the process of creating those two models, I would just offer my encouragement to keep at it, Fujifilm, and make it happen. It seems as though there are exciting times ahead for Fujifilm photographers!
This time next week, the upcoming Fujifilm X100VI will be official. We already know some things about it, but there’s also plenty that we don’t; however, soon we’ll know everything. Fujirumors is the place to find all the latest leaked specs. I don’t have any inside information, and Fuji X Weekly isn’t a rumor site, but I do like to talk about upcoming gear, especially if it’s a model that I am particularly interested in (such as the Fujifilm X100V successor). Fujifilm is going to announce the new camera at their upcoming X Summit on February 19th/20th, and all will be clear then.
The date of the X Summit—whether the 19th or 20th—depends on your time zone. It will be in Toyko at 2:30 PM on the 20th, which means that it will be 10:30 PM on the 19th in Phoenix. That’s 9:30 PM for those in the Pacific time zone, and 12:30 AM (just after midnight) for those in Eastern time. Preorders should be open immediately following the event, so if you want to be first in line, you might be up really late on the 19th, or up really early on the 20th if you’re in Europe or Africa.
I’m going to tune in to this particular X Summit. I don’t always watch them—in fact, I don’t catch the majority of them. This is one that I’m particularly interested in, so I’ll definitely tune in.
Then, on the 20th at 10 AM Phoenix time, which is 9 AM Pacific and noon Eastern, Nathalie Boucry and I will discuss the X Summit and the newly announced camera, plus whatever else was said—there’s some talk about possibly a new lens or major X App update or possible firmware updates. I have no idea what else besides the X100VI will be announced (if anything), but whatever it is, we’ll talk with you about it live on YouTube. This will be Episode 2 of the current SOOC Live season. I hope that you can join us!
Fujirumors is reporting which battery the upcoming Fujifilm X100VI will use: the old NP-W126S.
A lot of Fuji X Weekly readers frequently visit Fujirumors. There’s some crossover between the audience of both websites; however, I’m not a rumor site, and I don’t personally have inside information on upcoming gear. I can only comment about what other people report, and Fujirumors has a reputation of being correct a whole lot more than incorrect. If you want the inside scoop, that’s where you need to go. But I do get asked to comment on the things that Fujirumors reports. Just within the last couple of hours, three different people reached out to me for my opinion on the latest rumor.
I think a lot of photographers—myself included—speculated that, since the X100VI will have IBIS, it will also have the new WP-235 battery. Between the 40mp sensor and the in-body-image-stabilization, there’s a lot of potential battery drainage, so the old battery would be insufficient, and the new battery would be a requirement. In order to use the bigger battery, the camera would need to be larger, at least a little. Plus, the new battery is a tad heavier. The assumption was that the new camera would be a hair bigger and a little heavier to accommodate IBIS and the WP-235 battery.
The X100VI will indeed be a hair bigger—but literally just a hair—as apparently the lens needs to extend just 1mm further out to make room for the IBIS, but otherwise it will be basically identical to its predecessor. I’m sure the camera will be just a smidge heavier, too, but not much at all. By using the old battery—the same battery that the X100V takes—Fujifilm prioritized size and weight on the new model. It seems as though more will be the same than different between the X100V and X100VI, and that’s not bad whatsoever. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
But it definitely raises some questions regarding battery consumption. The expected battery life on the X100F was 390 pictures, and it increased to 420 on the X100V. Those numbers are decent enough, but not necessarily impressive; plenty of battery life most of the time, yet occasionally insufficient. Of course, battery life depends on a whole host of factors, so your mileage might vary. I used to own a Sigma DP Merrill camera that got between 35 and 40 exposures on a battery—about as many frames as a roll of 36 exp film. So it’s nowhere near that; however, it’s also not particularly close to the 580 shots that the X-T5 is rated at. The X-S20, with the old sensor and new battery, can apparently get 750 exposures, which illustrates that the new sensor drains the battery significantly more than the old sensor. So what kind of battery life are we looking at? I’m sure that the Fujifilm programmers worked some magic to maximize efficiency, but it would be pretty shocking if the X100VI can get more than 350 shots… it might even be less than 300. I have no idea, this is mere speculation, and I could certainly be wrong. I’ve been wrong plenty of times before, so definitely take all of this with a grain of salt.
There are, of course, some things that one can do to mitigate battery drainage. For example, on my X-T5, if I know I’ll be shooting all day and need the batteries to last, I’ll turn Image Stabilization Off, and only use it when I need it (most of the time I don’t need it). On my X100V, I like to keep the rear LCD off and use the Optical Viewfinder, which not only gives a film-like shooting experience, but also saves battery. It’s possible to make the battery last quite awhile if you need it to. And, as always, you can keep a spare or two nearby. If you are in a studio, you could always use a tethered faux battery that plugs into the wall.
I think it’s clear that the X100VI—much like the X100V—is a photographer’s camera more than a cinematography tool. With the heat issues and battery drainage—sure, it’s possible to use it for video with much success, but it is far from ideal for that purpose. I don’t use my X100V for video, and don’t anticipate using the X100VI for video, either, even with IBIS. Can you? Absolutely. Is it the best option? Absolutely not.
I’m actually a little glad that the X100VI will take the old NP-W126S, and that Fujifilm prioritized size and weight over battery life. The way I use the camera, I get significantly more than 420 exposures on a fully-charged battery. I can turn IBIS off, and only activate it when I need to, which I’m sure won’t be very often. It’s good to have IBIS as an option, but the reality is that it’s not all that important on a camera like the X100. Size and weight matter more to me. I don’t think Fujifilm’s battery choice will be a big deal for most people (it won’t be for me), but for some it might make the X100V an intriguing choice over the X100VI, just depending on how long the battery will last on the upcoming camera.
Fujirumors shared a couple of new Fujifilm X100VI rumors, and a lot of people have reached out to me asking for my reaction or commentary regarding them. I think it can be a lot of fun to speculate on what might be, but it’s important to remember that all will become clear in just a few weeks, when Fujifilm has their X Summit on the 19th/20th (date dependent on your time zone). I also want to give the disclaimer that I don’t have any inside information, and everything should be taken with a grain of salt, and not too seriously.
The first of the new rumors shared by Fujirumors is that the X100VI will have the new Reala Ace film simulation. Hallelujah! I thought that maybe it might, but it’s good to know that it will. Honestly, Fujifilm should have introduced Reala Ace on this camera, as it’ll have a much bigger marketing impact on X-series than GFX. Also, it’s important to remember that it won’t be 100% identical on X-Trans as it is on GFX, because the sensors are different… the most noticeable divergence will likely be shadow rendering. It will be pretty darn close, though, and I definitely look forward to trying it myself. Also, I’d be (pleasantly) surprised if Fujifilm gives Reala Ace to the X-T5 and X-H2. They should, but they probably won’t.
Dodge Van Steering Wheel – Buena Park, CA – Fujifilm X-T5 – Reala Ace Recipe
The second of the new rumors shared by Fujirumors is that the X100VI will only be 1mm thicker than the X100V. I don’t really know what this means, because (as far as I understand) the thickness is measured from the end of the lens to the back of the viewfinder cover. Within that space there is a lot of room for redesign. I highly doubt that Fujifilm did anything drastic (I’m pretty sure it will look nearly identical to the X100V), but the camera will have IBIS, which also likely means that it has the larger NP-W235 battery. Obviously all of that takes up space, and something’s got to give. Heat dispersion is an issue that must be dealt with. Will the new camera have a different rear screen (maybe similar to the X-T5)? If so, that might require slightly more space. It might be simply that the IBIS unit requires the sensor to be 1mm forward, so the lens needs to be moved 1mm outward to accommodate (this would be my bet). It could also be that the grip is a tad bigger; if it is, some will appreciate that and others might not. I don’t have a lot to say about this other than I’m sure the Fujifilm engineers pulled off a small miracle in the design, but also there is probably a bit more to the story than merely 1mm. There are still a lot of questions, but—like I said—all will be clear in just under three weeks when Fujifilm unveils it.
I’m really looking forward to the Fujifilm X100VI. I have an X100V that I’m not selling, but I’m very tempted by the successor, so I’ve only got a few weeks to figure out how to afford it, if I decide to preorder. The X100VI might just be the most ideal travel camera ever made… that is, of course, my opinion and mere speculation based on personal experience with the X100V and what the X100VI might be. Time will tell, though, and not too long from now, either.
We talked about the upcoming Fujifilm X100VI a bit yesterday, and today we got another interesting tidbit that’s worth discussing. According to Fujirumors, Fujifilm is planning to release at least one Limited Edition version of the X100VI, and it sounds like it might possibly be available to purchase on launch day.
Of course, Fujifilm has made some Limited Edition models in the past. Who can forget the USA Flag version of the X-A3? Nothing says ‘Merica quite like this.
Fujifilm X-A3 Limited Edition USA Flag
So I thought it would be fun to speculate what Limited Edition versions of the X100VI they could potentially release. Not long ago Fujifilm made the Disney version of the X100V. While I didn’t care for it personally, at least it wasn’t the red, white, and blue X-A3. There are a number of possible options that could actually be really cool. The Brown Edition of the X100F was snazzy, and I was tempted by it at the time.
I’ve thought of several options that Fujifilm could go with. The one that, by far, excites me the most is the Acros Edition, a B&W-only model. I doubt that Fujifilm will do this, but it would be extraordinarily epic if they did, and they absolutely should. Some other ideas are Graphite Silver (like the X-T1/X-T2), Dura Black / Dura Silver (like the X-Pro3), or Brown (like the X100F). Leica made a Limited Edition model with faux patina, maybe Fujifilm will do something similar? How about one with a different lens? They could make a more wide-angle or more telephoto version.
Fujifilm X100V Limited Edition Disney
The Disney Edition doesn’t excite me, but one with the classic Fujifilm logo on it could be decent, if done right. How about one with Mount Fuji? Maybe they should have a Fuji X Weekly model? It could have my Teton X logo printed on the front. Just kidding, of course.
I have no idea what the Limited Edition X100VI will look like. It could be something really cool or extremely outlandish. If it’s especially cool, it will make the camera even more tempting. I suppose that we’ll find out soon enough.
I had speculated that it would be called X100Z, but I was wrong. A lot of people thought it would be X100R, but that was also incorrect. Instead, Fujifilm took the boring route, and chose X100VI as the name. How very Sony of them, right?
Will people pronounce it X100-Vee-Eye, X100-Six, X100-The-Sixth, or X100-Mark-Six? I will call the camera X100-Vee-Eye personally; however, it’s not a very exciting name. I’m sure Fujifilm had a list of potential names on a dry-erase board at their Japan office, and they looked at that short list daily for months. After much consideration and deliberation, they chose the option they felt was the safest. Playing it safe is often riskier than being bold, and the potential reward is almost always smaller. Fujifilm should have gone with a striking name, something that rolls off the tongue and stirs the imagination. Something that grabs your attention and demands that you take a closer look. X100V did that, but X100VI does not. X100Z, X100R, X100X, X100G—names like that—stand out much more than X100 VI, X100 VII, X100 VIII, X100 IX, etc.; one set it exciting and imaginative and surprising, while the other is boring and clinical and routine.
The name is probably the least important aspect of the camera; however, a boring name does not give confidence to the rest of the model. If Fujifilm is unwilling to take a small risk with the name, what else about it are they playing safe? The original X100, which launched the entire X-series (note: the X-Pro1, which came out about a year-and-a-half later, was the first X-mount and first X-Trans), was a very daring product that took the camera industry by surprise. Since the release of the X100, Fujifilm has done a lot of risk-taking, and most often it has worked out really well for them. Nowadays it seems as though Fujifilm wants to evolve to become more like the Canikony brands, which too-often values caution and complacency over bold risks.
In any event, I’m sure that the X100VI will be an excellent camera, every bit as good as the X100V, and just a bit better. What will be different about it? Nothing is known at this point. My guess is that it will have the 40mp X-Trans V sensor and processor, as well as the latest JPEG options (maybe not Reala Ace; however, don’t worry, because I have a Film Simulation Recipe that mimics it), but otherwise will be 99% the same as the X100V. That’s only speculation, and as was demonstrated at the top of this article, my guesses are not always right. Fujifilm could very well give the X100-series a pretty significant refresh with the VI iteration, but if the name is any indication, it seems like they plan to play it as safe as they can this time around.
