According to Fujirumors, the “camera line that most of us thought axed” that Fujifilm will be reviving is the X-M series. Apparently it will be called X-M5 and will be released sometime before the end of the year—September and November are a couple of months that Fujifilm likes to use for announcements, so maybe then. Nothing else is known at this time.
For those who don’t remember, the X-M1 was a short-lived camera near the beginning of the X-series that wasn’t particularly successful. It was unusual in that it had an X-Trans I sensor paired with an X-Trans II processor. It was a predecessor to the X-A line (the X-A1 had an identical body), and positioned lower than the X-E series. While it had a rangefinder look, it was given a PASM dial and didn’t have a viewfinder.
The X-M1 was released in the summer of 2013, right after Fujifilm began rolling out X-Trans II cameras. They also announced the nearly identical X-A1 just a few months afterwards. Those who were more familiar with the X-series and cameras in-general opted for the X-E1 or (a few months later) X-E2 because the X-E1 line was better (build quality, EVF, etc.), while those who were unfamiliar opted for the X-A1 instead because it was cheaper and the advantage of the X-M1 wasn’t obvious or well communicated. The X-M series was axed about a year later, but supplies lasted for another year due to unsold inventory.
While the upcoming camera will be called X-M5, I’m not sure what might be similar or dissimilar compared to the X-M1. I have some guesses, but it’s pure speculation. I have some suggestions for Fujifilm, but it might be too late in the design process to be implemented; however, I’ll give them anyway. I think the X-M5 is actually a smart move because Fujifilm is desperately missing a budget-friendly option for those who wish to get into the X-series but don’t have a ton to spend.
If I were Fujifilm, I would design it with a rangefinder-like shape that’s not too dissimilar to the X100VI and X-E4. In other words, it should look like the X-M1 to a large degree. I think they would be smart to keep the size down as much as possible—in fact, make the X-M5 the smallest interchangeable-lens X-series camera ever produced. Personally, I would ditch the PASM dial and use a shutter knob—the X-H series wen’t from non-PASM to PASM, so no reason X-M can’t go the other route. I doubt that it will have IBIS, unless the idea is not to keep the price down—an X-M5 with IBIS will likely be at least $900-$1,000 for the body alone, an X-M5 without IBIS should be in the $700-$800 range.
I would use the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor paired with the X-Processor V (like the X-S20, which also parallels the X-M1) and the old NP-W126S battery. Because of the small body size and heat dispersion issues, the camera will likely need some performance limitations to prevent it from overheating, which will simultaneously differentiate it from more premium (a.k.a. expensive) models. It won’t likely have an EVF, but it should have a tilting screen similar (identical?) to the one on the X-T50; however, if they do choose to add IBIS, don’t be surprised if it has a flippy screen like the X-S20. I would hope that Fujifilm would give it C1-C7 custom presets, but the X-M1 didn’t, so it’s possible that the X-M5 won’t either; however, that would be a mistake if they did—perhaps just C1-C4 if they feel the need to limit it (please give it C1-C7, though).
It seems like a safe assumption that the X-M5 will sit below the (discontinued) X-E4, eventual future X-E5, and the X-T30 II as Fujifilm’s low-budget base-level camera. Since Fujifilm discontinued both the X-A and X-T000 lines a few years back, there hasn’t been a good option for those on a tight budget to get into the X-series, except to hope for a good deal in the used market. I cannot tell you how many times people have asked me for advice on purchasing an inexpensive Fujifilm camera, but there just aren’t any options for brand-new bodies (the X-T30 II being the closest, currently). With the X-M5, there might finally be an inexpensive camera to recommend.
Fujifilm quietly released a special edition of the Fujifilm X-T4, and nobody noticed. Specifically, it’s the X-T4 ES (“Extended Spectrum”), which is a full-spectrum infrared camera. Digital camera sensors are sensitive to light outside of what humans can see, and a filter is added to the top of the sensor to block those wavelengths so that you get normal-looking colors. The Fujifilm X-T4 ES is an ordinary X-T4, just without the infrared filter over the sensor, allowing the camera to capture invisible light, which dramatically transforms an ordinary scene into something dreamlike.
I’ve wanted to try infrared photography for decades. A long time ago I shot one roll (I believe it was Ektachrome EIR, but I don’t remember for certain); however, none of the frames turned out—mostly because I really didn’t know what I was doing way back then. More recently, I learned that many Fujifilm cameras have some IR sensitivity, so I made several infrared photographs with a non-converted camera; however, that was only a tease.
The problem with modern infrared photography is that (with a few exceptions) it requires you to ship out your old gear to have an expensive and invasive procedure performed in order to remove the IR filter. There are a couple of places that will do it, and at a few different times I strongly considered sending out my old X-T1 to be converted to full-spectrum. You can also buy one that’s already done, but it will either be a used model with a roughly $500 premium, or a new model with that same premium and without a warranty. Two years ago I suggested that Fujifilm should offer an IR camera, and now they have, so I bought it!
The Fujifilm X-T4 ES is not the first infrared camera made by Fujifilm. The first was the S3 Pro UVIR in 2006, followed by the IS-1 (infrared version of the FinePix S9100) in 2007, then X-T1 IR in 2015, then GFX100 IR in 2020, and finally the X-T4 ES in 2024. However, the X-T4 ES is the first made available to the general public, as the others were specifically for “forensic, scientific, and cultural preservation applications.” Fujifilm very quietly released the X-T4 ES only on their website and with almost no promotion. Nobody even noticed it! Well, almost nobody—the camera was sold out within about a week. I’m not sure how many copies were produced—whatever the number, they were gone very quickly. I think it goes to show that there is a demand for such a camera, and Fujifilm should do something similar soon, but have more units available for purchase.
Yesterday a Fujifilm X-T4 ES arrived at my doorstep. I’m very underprepared, and excitedly waiting for some infrared filters to arrive in the mail (you need various filters to control the light to achieve different outcomes) within the coming week; however, I was surprised to learn that my old color filters for B&W film photography work for infrared. Also, unfiltered full-spectrum pictures can be quite interesting, too. I have so much to learn, and a ton of experiments to do, but so far I’m thrilled and amazed by the results—there’s a ton of potential!
I’ve only captured a small number of photographs with the new camera, and just right around the house—nothing even remotely series. The general rule of thumb that I have seen online is that IR pictures require significant editing (including color channel swaps) to get good results, particularly for color images. Of course—you know me—I’m interested in straight-out-of-camera pictures that don’t require editing, so my goal is to create Film Simulation Recipes for use with the full-spectrum Fujifilm X-T4 ES. I have a long ways to go, so it will likely be awhile before I publish anything. With that said, the pictures below are all unedited camera-made JPEGs that I’ve captured with my Fujifilm X-T4 ES, so maybe it won’t take so long afterall.
A straight-out-of-camera B&W IR picture from my Fujifilm X-E4
I’ve had a fascination with infrared photography for a very long time. Using light beyond the visible spectrum to create pictures often produces unusual results—an ordinary scene can become extraordinary with infrared photography. While I’ve been interested in this type of photography for awhile, I’ve not experimented much with it. Many years ago I shot a roll of IR film, but it didn’t turn out very well; that’s mostly my entire IR experience. I’m an infrared novice.
Even though digital cameras have a filter to block infrared light, many cameras are still IR sensitive. You can test your camera by pointing a TV remote (which works via infrared light) at it. When you press a button on the remote, if your camera is IR sensitive, you’ll see the infrared light in the LCD or electronic viewfinder. It turns out that my Fujifilm X-E4 is indeed IR sensitive (I believe that many Fujifilm cameras are). A few years ago I experimented using a non-IR converted X-E4 with a 720nm IR filter, and I indeed got some infrared pictures.
The big problem with IR photography, of course, is that—at least for color pictures—it requires significant editing, including swapping color channels. If you are a JPEG photographer who doesn’t want to hassle with all that, your options are quite limited. Black-and-white IR is a completely different story; you can get dramatic results out-of-camera without much trouble. For color, either you’ve got to be happy with a red picture, or you’ve got to edit. If you have a full-spectrum camera, there is one option that doesn’t require editing, but it does require that the camera be full-spectrum and not just IR converted.
SOOC JPEG from my Fujifilm X-E4 using a 720nm IR filter.
Same picture after a crude R/B color channel swap and a quick edit.
Anyway, I’m writing all of this because I told you that I’d update you regarding the Fujifilm X-T4 ES (Extended Spectrum) camera that I ordered from the Fujifilm website. Right in the middle of my move, I received an email from Fujifilm (the “monthly content roundup” email that many of you might also receive), and towards the bottom of it was an add for the Fujifilm X-T4 ES. “Look into the infrared extended spectrum and document the results in beautiful detail with this specialist version of the popular X-T4.”
There was a link in the email to the official Fujifilm online store where the X-T4 ES was listed with very little information about what it is exactly. Even though I did not know much about the specifics of its IR capabilities, I decided to order the camera anyway. The link no longer works (and hasn’t for a week-and-a-half), and the X-T4 ES can no longer be found on the website. I assumed that either the listing was a mistake, or it was sold out quickly.
Then today (two weeks after ordering) I received an email stating that the camera has shipped. Apparently the Fujifilm X-T4 ES has traversed from New Jersey to Tennessee, and just departed Memphis for Arizona within the last few minutes. It’s supposed to arrive at my door on Monday. Yea!
I searched the internet, and found very little information about the Fujifilm X-T4 ES. It was briefly listed at B&H (apparently mistakenly) back in February of last year. Fujifilm has made two other IR models—the X-T1 and GFX100—but those were specifically for “forensic, scientific, and cultural preservation applications, and will not be made available to general customers for personal use.” But the X-T4 ES was made available to the general public, just in a very limited quantity and without much fanfare. I’m not sure what “extended spectrum” even means, so that’s something I look forward to finding out.
It won’t be much longer before I’m capturing infrared pictures on a dedicated Fujifilm IR camera, but in the meantime, I have a lot of questions and very few answers. Once I have the Fujifilm X-T4 ES in my hands, I’ll be able to tell you a lot more about it. Stay tuned!
***Update: Well, that was fast! Fujifilm has released firmware version 1.02 for the X-T50, which fixes the issue for those who couldn’t update to version 1.01. If you are on version 1.01, version 1.02 is identical for you, so no need to update (although there’s also no harm in doing so, either). If you are on version 1.00, updating to the latest firmware fixes some small and rare bugs that are unlikely to affect you, but possibly could.
Fujifilm just recently updated the firmware on the X-T50 to version 1.01, but there’s been a small and unusual “bug” identified, which only affects certain models. The 1.01 firmware fixes some minor and rare issues; however, the firmware update itself has one issue.
The problem is a weird one: on only certain X-T50 cameras, you cannot update the firmware. That’s the bug. On certain models, you’re “stuck” with version 1.00. That’s no big deal, because version 1.00 isn’t bad whatsoever; version 1.01 was basically only a minor-bug-fix type update. I think the issue must actually be with version 1.00 and not 1.01, but it will all get sorted out soon enough, I’m sure, so no worries.
Specifically, the cameras affected are the silver models (not the black or grey) that were sold with the new kit zoom lens (apparently not the ones sold with 15-45mm lens or body-only) that have these serial numbers: 4BA24662 to 4BA26561, 4BA30592 to 4BA30661, 4BA34838 to 4BA35137, 4BA35678 to 4BA35857, and 4BA37468 to 4BA37687. Fujifilm was quick to acknowledge and apologize for the issue, and they are working on a solution right now.
The Fujifilm X-T50 that’s sitting on my desk in front of me is black, so I’m not affected, personally. However, if I were affected, I wouldn’t worry much. Also, it’s always a good idea to wait at least a few days—if not a few weeks—to update the firmware, unless it is one that fixes a major bug. From my experience with apps, when you fix the coding for something, something else seemingly unrelated can be affected by it; that functionality (whatever it is) wasn’t thoroughly tested because there was no expectation that it would perform any differently than it had before. So waiting a few days or longer before updating is a good rule of thumb that can save you some heartache later.
Fujirumors is reporting that Fujifilm is in the process of “reviving a camera line that most of us thought axed.” According to Fujirumors, the camera could be released anytime within the next six months. It’s always exciting when new gear is on the horizon, and it’s fun to speculate what it might or might not be. But, until it is actually released, it’s hard to know anything for certain, and so all speculation should be taken with a huge grain of salt.
The idea of a camera line revival made me consider which discontinued camera series could possibly be resurrected (apparently it isn’t the GFX50R). Over the years various series have become defunct, typically (but not always) due of disappointing sales figures. There are a number of options, so let’s briefly consider each.
My biggest hope is for an X70 successor, likely called X80. The X70 was Fujifilm’s closest competitor to the Ricoh GR series. It’s more-or-less a smaller and more wide-angle and less premium (a.k.a. more affordable) X100-series camera. Supposedly the X70 was discontinued (in 2016) because Sony suddenly stopped manufacturing the 16mp sensor found inside it, and the higher megapixel X-Trans sensors were too hot for such a small body, which prevented a successor from happening; perhaps they’ve finally figured out the heat issue (X-Trans IV sensor combined with X Processor 5?). I’ve been asking for an X70 successor for several years now, and with the popularity of Ricoh GR and other compact cameras, it seems like a no-brainer. I hope this is what’s coming, but it definitely might not be.
There are a few cameras that it could theoretically possibly be, but I’d be extremely shocked if it was. An X-S2, for example, which would be a DSLR-shaped fixed-lens super-zoom small-sensor Bayer+PASM followup to the X-S1, is not likely. I’m pretty certain that an S4 Pro is not coming, as the S3 Pro was built inside a Nikon DSLR. I don’t think an X-A30, a stripped down Bayer successor to the X-A20, is on the horizon, either.
Kodak (or, really, JK Imaging using the Kodak brand name) is selling cheap point-and-shoots like hotcakes right now; while a followup to the XF1 might seem strange, maybe it would actually be genius. If this is the upcoming camera, it would be a highly unexpected move, but one that might actually pay off and even possibly return this style to the mainstream. With the popularity of digicams right now, an XF2 isn’t completely out of the realm of possibilities; however, the odds seem pretty slim that this is it.
Perhaps an X40 is the upcoming camera: a pocket-sized retro-styled zoom with an EVF. There’s definitely an interest in an X30 successor—I’ve heard from at least a handful of people who would really like to see one—but I’m not sure if there is enough global demand for it to be worthwhile for Fujifilm; however, I would buy one if they made it. There is certainly a chance, albeit a small one, that an X40 is coming soon.
Kind of in-between an XF2 and X40 could be an XQ3, a followup to the XQ2. I’m very doubtful that Fujifilm will make any more small-sensor X-Trans cameras; however, if they produced an XQ3 (or X40) with a 20mp 1″ sensor, that would be intriguing (outside of the XF2, I don’t think Fujifilm should go any smaller than a 1″ sensor).
I’d actually be quite surprised if they released any new X series cameras with a sensor smaller than APS-C. In all probability, whatever camera Fujifilm is working on is an APS-C model, and not one with a tiny sensor. There are several options that I believe are much more likely than the XF2, X40 or XQ3.
The XF10 was the low-budget Bayer+PASM version of the X70, and it was a bit of a flop. However, with the popularity of Ricoh GR cameras right now, it wouldn’t be surprising if Fujifilm is working on a (hopefully significantly improved) successor, likely called the XF20. While I would much prefer an X80, I wouldn’t be against an XF20, if that’s what it ends up being.
That’s it for the fixed-lens options! Let’s take a look at some possible interchangeable-lens cameras that the upcoming model could possibly be. Fujifilm is supposedly working on a future X-E5 that is not this unknown camera, so I won’t discuss the X-E series in this article.
The X-A line used to be a top seller for Fujifilm, especially in Asian markets. These cameras were low-budget Bayer+PASM models that were not actually manufactured by Fujifilm, but contracted out to a 3rd party for assembly. The last one was the X-A7, which didn’t sell particularly well, and the line was discontinued. It’s possible that Fujifilm will revive this series with an X-A8, and maybe even manufacture it in-house.
Similarly, the X-T000 line was a low-budget Bayer+PASM series not manufactured by Fujifilm. It was basically an X-A camera but in an SLR shape (instead of rangefinder) and with an EVF. It’s unlikely that Fujifilm would revive both the X-A and X-T000 series, but they could bring back one of the two, and if it’s the X-T000 line, the camera would likely be called X-T300.
Last—but far from least—is the X-M2. I think the upcoming camera is more likely to be an X-M1 successor than an X-A8 or X-T300. The X-M1 was basically an X-A1 with an X-Trans sensor; the X-M2 would be a low-budget X-E like camera (but cheaper, with a PASM dial, and without an EVF), utilizing the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor. Fujifilm is desperately missing an affordable base-level camera that allows those on a tight budget to get into the system, and an X-M2 could serve that role. A brown faux-leather version would be quite nice.
If Fujifilm is indeed reviving a once-defunct camera series, it could be any of these (or maybe one that I overlooked—who knows?). There’s not a lot that can be gleaned from this exercise, other than it’s likely to be a more affordable camera, which is great—there aren’t currently a lot of options right now if you don’t have much to spend. My personal preference would be for an X80 (I’d be first in line to buy it!), but the XF20 would be ok if that’s what it ends up being. I think an X-A8, X-T300, or (especially) an X-M2 are also strong possibilities. Basically, we know very little, and it could be just about anything.
Which of these cameras would you be most interested in? Let me know in the comments!
The short answer is no. The longer answer is below.
There’s a controversy that’s been brewing for awhile, but has really gained steam over the last couple of weeks, that suggests Fujifilm is purposefully crafting market shortages of products so as to create hype (or, really, FOMO), in an attempt to ensure that their products are constantly in high demand. The roots of this controversy are in the constant shortages of Fujifilm’s products. At one time, you could walk into most camera stores on any given day and buy the camera or lens that you wanted; however, over the last few years, that hasn’t always been the case. Then, just recently, Fujifilm seemed to confirm it.
Manhattan from Pulaski Bridge – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – PRO Negative 160C
“The most important point is how much brand strength to create and how to maintain it,” said Teiichi Goto, Fujifilm President and CEO, in response to a question about their inventory situation and plan. “Therefore, it would be quite unfortunate to manufacture too much and lower the price. What Fujifilm has been trying to do for a long time is finally coming true now. We intend to drive the entire imaging business, including Instax, while concentrating on building brand strength and not reducing the value of the properties purchased by our customers.” When asked if the current inventory situation is normal, Mr. Goto replied, “Yes.”
A lot of people responded to this with something to the effect of: “This proves it! Fujifilm is purposefully creating camera shortages to manipulate the market.” But I think they misunderstand it. I wasn’t planning to write this article, but, since I’ve had several people ask me to comment on the controversy, I thought I’d type out my opinion.
I’m completely convinced that if Fujifilm could produce the precise number of gear (cameras, lenses, etc.) for the current demand, so that everyone who wanted to purchase something could do so without waiting, they would. But that’s nearly impossible to correctly estimate. When PetaPixel asked for clarification if they consider insufficient supply to be part of a marketing strategy, Fujifilm responded, “No. Our marketing strategy is to showcase the innovation behind our lineup of digital cameras and lenses to provide creators with a variety of options so they can choose the right tools for their craft.”
Sign on the Roof – Gila Bend, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Classic Color
It takes many months for a camera to be manufactured and end up at a camera store. Fujifilm has to secure the parts, get them assembled, and shipped across the world. They are guessing in December what the demand might be in July. And there are limited resources for manufacturing. How many parts can a supplier produce at any given time? How many cameras can an assembly line put together each day? The whole process is much more complex than I think many people assume. Fujifilm not only has to anticipate future demand, but they have to figure out how to meet that within the constrains of many and various limitations.
Demand isn’t steady, but constantly fluctuating. It can spike unexpectedly, and fall off a cliff unexpectedly. If the demand for a certain camera suddenly ceases, Fujifilm needs to anticipate that months and months in advance, or they’ll continue to manufacture tens of thousands of copies of a product that few are buying.
Let’s look at the Fujifilm X100V. It was released in early 2020, and, for about two-and-a-half years, Fujifilm was more-or-less manufacturing the number of copies it needed in order to meet the demand for that camera. Then, suddenly, demand spiked, due to several viral TikTok videos. Fujifilm did not ramp up production (or, if they did, it wasn’t nearly enough) of the X100V, likely because they assumed the hype would quickly dissipate, especially since the camera was approaching three-years-old at the time; however, they guessed wrong.
Sentinel & Merced – Yosemite NP, CA – Fujifilm X100V – Vintage Color
For the X100VI, Fujifilm assumed that doubling the production of the X100V would be enough to meet the anticipated demand for it. Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your perspective, the demand for the X100VI was historic and unprecedented. There were more preorders for the X100VI in China alone than there were X100V’s manufactured in total. Fujifilm has said that they will be increasing production of the X100VI, but I’m not certain to what extent exactly (I’ve heard that it could be 30,000 units per month by sometime in the summer, but I have no idea what the precise numbers are right now).
This is uncharted territory for not just Fujifilm, but for any camera maker. Fujifilm has to try to meet steep current demand while being hyper alert for any changes in future demand. If, for example, they are actually making 30K cameras per month, and suddenly the floor drops and nobody wants one, and they’ve already set in motion the manufacturing of 150K cameras, that could be enough to bankrupt the company (at least the camera division).
Another example is the Fujifilm X-E3 and X-E4 cameras. Fujifilm anticipated that demand for the X-E3 would be greater than it actually was, and made too many copies. Fujifilm had to discount the X-E3, and sometimes significantly, to clear the warehouse. You could still find brand-new (and discounted) X-E3 bodies 18 months after it had been officially discontinued. Fujifilm used the sales figures of the X-E3 to estimate the demand for the X-E4; however, the X-E4 was much more in-demand than the X-E3 was (largely because it was viewed as a top alternative to the impossible-to-find X100V in the aftermath of the viral videos). Fujifilm did not secure enough parts to manufacture nearly enough copies to meet the demand of the X-E4, and likely assumed (incorrectly) that the spike in demand would be short-lived. If you look at eBay, X-E4’s are listed for double the price of X-E3’s, and much higher than the MSRP when they were brand-new.
I bring that up for a specific reason. While consumers prefer over-manufacturing (especially since it usually means one can find bargains, and you can readily buy what you want), producers prefer under-manufacturing. Most ideal is precise-manufacturing, but that is really difficult to achieve; between over and under, every company—including Fujifilm—would much prefer to err on the side of making too few of something than too much. And, if you want the gear that you spent a lot of money on to retain its value, you, too, will prefer them to err on the side of caution.
Toyota created the Toyota Production System in the aftermath of WWII. This system invented what is now referred to as Lean Manufacturing (or Lean Business Philosophy or Lean Strategy Process). Many books have been written on this topic—I have a few on my library shelf, although I’ve only actually read one. To understand Fujifilm’s approach to manufacturing and inventory means understanding the Lean approach, which is used worldwide, especially in Japan. This Harvard Business Review article gives a very brief synopsis of what the Lean strategy is, just to give you an idea; even better, I’m sure your local bookstore has a few books on this topic.
The conclusion is that Fujifilm (along with all manufacturers) is in the tough position of trying to accurately gauge demand for each product they offer, and attempt to produce just the right amount; if they are going to err on one side or the other, they much prefer to err by producing too few copies than too many. Making too many of something reduces its value, while making just the right amount or too few does not. They have to guess what the demand will be many months from now, not just what the current demand is. The current demand might be an indication of future demand, but it also might not. Fujifilm would love to make and sell 50,000 copies of something, but just because they make 50,000 copies of something doesn’t mean that they will actually sell them all. A much better position for Fujifilm is to make 30,00 copies of something, and sell them all. That’s not manipulating the market, but simply good business strategy that provides some stability in a turbulent market.
The Fujifilm X-E4 is one of my absolute favorite Fujifilm cameras. There was a lot of demand for it, then, inexplicably, Fujifilm discontinued the X-E4 while there was still a fairly lengthy backorder list. According to Fujirumors, Fujifilm is working on the X-E5 right now, possibly to be released sometime in 2025. There’s a reasonable chance that Fujifilm will read this, so I thought I’d take the opportunity to express my wish-list for the camera.
The Fujifilm X-E1 was my gateway into the Fujifilm system. The camera, which was released in 2012 and was Fujifilm’s second interchangeable-lens X-series camera (only preceded by the X-Pro1), was praised for its beautiful retro rangefinder design (nicknamed “Sexy One”), but also criticized for its sluggish performance (some of which was rectified in firmware updates). The X-E1 was fairly quickly replaced by the X-E2, and a minor updated version called the X-E2s was released at the end of the X-Trans II lifecycle (beginning the pattern of X-E cameras released near the end of a sensor generation). While the X-E series has a history of somewhat slow sales, the cameras tend to be much beloved by those who own them. The X-E4 did not experience sluggish sales (in fact, Fujifilm was unable to meet the strong demand); however, it was discontinued anyway, presumably because Fujifilm did not secure enough parts to produce more.
I love the Fujifilm X-E4 because it is small and lightweight, which makes it more pleasant to carry around as an everyday camera. When traveling, there’s limited space for gear in the bag, and tough choices must be made; the X-E4 takes up less room than other bodies, so it’s more likely to be chosen over larger and heavier cameras. In fact, the X-E4 and X100V (and now X100VI) have been my go-to travel cameras since 2021. I also appreciate its clean minimalistic design of the camera.
Fujifilm could simply engrave “X-E5” on the new camera and include the X-Processor 5, but keep everything else completely identical to the X-E4, and it would sell. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. People wanted the X-E4 but simply couldn’t get it. An X-E5 that is just an X-E4 with the new processor and the new film simulations would do quite well, I’m certain of it. The less Fujifilm changes, the better.
With that said, there are some things that would make the X-E5 even better than the X-E4. I do feel the minimalistic approach was perhaps a bit too minimalistic. The five key changes that I would make if I were one of the designers are: 1) bring back the M/C/S switch, 2) add an ISO Ring around the Shutter Knob like the X100 and X-Pro series have, 3) add back the rear command dial, 4) improve the EVF resolution, and 5) add a small grip to the front like the X-E3 has.
These might be unpopular opinions, but I would use the “old” 26mp X-Trans IV sensor in combination with the X-Trans V processor (like the X-S20); IBIS is unnecessary, and should be avoided for weight and cost reasons; the camera doesn’t need to be weather-sealed. Keep the X-E5 as similar to the X-E4 as possible, just refine it a little with a handful of small improvements.
There’s a massive opportunity that I believe Fujifilm has largely ignored. One of the biggest advantages of APS-C over full-frame is size/weight. There are tradeoffs with anything, and APS-C seems to strike a near perfect balance of size/weight, performance, image quality, and value. While full-frame cameras have been shrinking lately, APS-C has not; instead, the APS-C advantage has been shrinking. This is easily rectified, though, and the X-E5 is one step towards that, but it needs to be kept small, light, and affordable. The other key piece that’s missing are pancake lenses.
Yes, there’s the exceptional Fujinon XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR; however, it’s not often readily available for purchase. Likely, you have to add yourself to a backorder list and wait awhile. There’s also the sort-of pancake (Japanese pancake?) Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R, but it is old, overpriced, and in desperate need of an update. Otherwise, there aren’t many options—at least not natively; however, there are some 3rd-party pancake lenses that have recently appeared, which is good. Fujifilm needs to add a few more pancakes to the Fujinon lineup, and not be satisfied with just two.
I think a total of five pancake lenses would do the trick. The 27mm f/2.8 already exists, but simply needs to be made available. The 18mm f/2 also already exists, although I would strongly encourage Fujifilm to update it. The three lenses that, in my opinion, Fujifilm should add to the pancake lens lineup are 15mm f/3.5, 23mm f/2.8, and 40mm f/2.8. That gives a good variety, and all five would together make for a fantastic kit.
Since Fujifilm already has two 23mm lenses—the 23mm f/2 and 23mm f/1.4—they might consider something else that they don’t have, perhaps 20mm or 25mm, but definitely something in-between 18mm and 27mm. Instead of 40mm, a longer focal-length could alternatively be chosen, such as 45mm f/3.5 or 55mm f/4. The point is to have something wider than 18mm, something more telephoto than 27mm, and an option in-between the 18mm and 27mm.
A small and lightweight camera—such as the X-E5—combined with a handful of small lenses would make an ideal kit for travel and walk-around photography. It would clearly illustrate a significant advantage of APS-C over full-frame—imagine a camera and five-lens kit that could all fit into a small camera bag! I have no doubt that it would be successful, but it would require that Fujifilm clearly articulate why a small camera with small lenses should be desirable.
I don’t know if the “right” people at Fujifilm will read this, or, if they do, if they’ll listen. But, just in case, I wanted to make sure to get my opinions out there. Now it’s your turn! What would you like to see in a Fujifilm X-E5? What pancake lenses do you think that Fujifilm should make? Let me know in the comments!
The last time that I used my Fujifilm X-T30 was in early December. Yesterday was the first instance I had made any pictures with it in over six months, the longest time in-between use. Once it was my most-used camera; there was a time when I really, really liked the X-T30.
I purchased my Fujifilm X-T30 brand-new in 2019, right when it was announced in February. I used it extensively for about 15 months, until my wife gave me an X100V for my birthday. I still regularly photographed with it for awhile (although not nearly as much as before the X100V), until I purchased a Fujifilm X-E4 in March of 2021. Ever since then, my X-T30 has mostly sat on the shelf collecting dust. Every now-and-then I still capture some images with it. At first it was once every few weeks, then once every couple of months—the time gap has been growing longer and longer. Finally, it surpassed six months.
You might think that it’s time to sell it. If I’m not using the camera, perhaps someone else could. I’m sure there are people contemplating a used X-T30 right now. But I kind of want to hold onto it awhile longer. I have a lot of memories with the camera. In fact, just today my wife was showing me some family pictures from 2019 and early 2020, and in a number of them I have an X-T30 in my hands or around my neck. Maybe I should consider parting ways with it, but I’m not ready to do so just yet.
Especially after yesterday. I dusted the camera off, attached a TTArtisan 27mm f/2.8 lens, loaded it with my Kodacolor Recipe, and captured a bunch of pictures—I’ve included four of those images above. It was so much fun! My kids enjoyed being photographed, too. I’m not a portrait photographer, but I sometimes pretend to be one. The X-T30 is a great little camera, and I particularly appreciate the diminutive size and weight of it. The Kodacolor Recipe is one of my favorites, especially for a 1980’s vibe.
While I’d prefer a Fujifilm X-T30 II or especially a Fujifilm X-T50, the X-T30—the original one from 2019—is still very good. Just because some new camera comes along that’s “better” doesn’t mean that the camera you own and use is somehow not good. The Fujifilm X-T30 is still worth owning and using in 2024, and will be for awhile to come. I definitely need to use it more often than I have recently, and not allow so much time to go by in-between picking it up.
There’s a digital camera that Fujifilm should absolutely be making right now, and it’s not the X-Pro4, or X-E5, or a full-frame model (although those would be great, too). There’s a specific camera that would fly off the shelves—the X100VI’s historic demand would pale in comparison. What is this camera?
The digital QuickSnap.
The Fujifilm QuickSnap is a disposable 35mm film camera that is beloved for its nostalgic lo-fidelity aesthetic, simplicity, and price. Fujifilm introduced the QuickSnap camera in 1986, with the slogan, “Everybody should enjoy photography with ease.” The QuickSnap was an immediate success, and was immensely popular for a very long time—it was even successful enough to survive the film crash of the 2000’s. People still buy and use QuickSnap cameras; they’re particularly popular for weddings, kids, and lomographers. Many people love the nostalgic experience of one-time-use cameras.
Interestingly, the most sold digital camera right now in Japan is a cheap Kodak digicam. Third and fifth places are also cheap Kodak digicams. Digicams are a dime a dozen (perhaps literally, if you win a collection on an auction site, or rummage through your parents or grandparents house). What’s missing in the photo world is a digital version of the QuickSnap, a film camera that partially inspired the digicam. I have zero doubts that it would be a massive success for Fujifilm, and would probably leave all digicams in the dust.
This is how I envision the digital QuickSnap:
First, it would need a digital sensor that obviously won’t be anywhere close to full-frame, since that would be both ridiculous and expensive. The Fujifilm Mini Evo has a tiny 5mp sensor; it would likely be a mistake to use that one, but they certainly could. I think that a 12mp or 16mp 1/2.3″ would be the most obvious choice, since those can be obtained by Fujifilm rather easily and cheaply. The sensor itself doesn’t matter all that much; however, cost and quality must be balanced extremely carefully. Too poor of image quality will hurt sales, while a too expensive price-tag will also hurt sales.
More important, though, is the picture aesthetic. Fujifilm should program it with their Classic Negative film simulation, including faux grain—something similar to my Fujicolor Superia 800 Recipe. The pictures created by the digital QuickSnap camera should look similar to the pictures that come out of an analog QuickSnap. As much as practical, the pictures need to look alike from the film and digital versions.
Next, it needs to function nearly the same as the analog QuickSnap. It should be super simple: a switch to activate the built-in flash, a wheel to cock the shutter and “advance” to the next frame, a shutter release button, a battery-level indicator, and maybe a one-press picture-transfer to an app. There should not be any LCD or electronic viewfinder to review the pictures.
The very basic optical viewfinder from the film camera should be carried over—the user experience should be as similar to the analog version as possible. Due to the crop factor of the sensor, a new lens will be necessary. The exact sensor size will determine what the lens should be, perhaps something like a 5mm or 6mm f/5.6 plastic lens that’s close to 30mm full-frame equivalent. What is important is that it is focus-free (fixed focus) and produces a similar aesthetic to the film camera.
A critical factor of one-time-use cameras is the film itself; namely, the tolerance for under and over exposure. Since the sensor won’t have this same tolerance, it’s necessary for the digital QuickSnap to have some amount of exposure control. It must have a light meter, as well as some (auto) control over the ISO and shutter speed. For the sake of image quality, the ISO should be capped as low as practical. If Fujifilm could utilize the D-Range Priority technology, I think that would help, too.
The digital QuickSnap should have internal storage that saves only 27 JPEG images. It could count the exposures mechanically exactly like the film camera does, providing an identical experience. Once the 27th picture has been captured, it won’t let you capture anymore until the memory has been cleared, either by wirelessly transferring the images to a mobile app, or via USB. The QuickSnap App should be super simple (and actually work), with an option within the app to auto-connect and transfer once 27 pictures have been recorded, or manually connect and transfer if preferable. The camera should also be able to connect to the Instax app, and transfer (and print) directly from there. The camera should charge via USB, and could also transfer the images using a USB cable. Once the pictures have been removed from the camera, it would then allow the user to capture the next 27 frames.
The QuickSnap App, aside from photo transfers, should have a few simple options, for those who wish to do a little more with their pictures. A retro-styled date stamp. Maybe a few filter overlays that don’t radically change the picture aesthetic (examples: high contrast, low contrast, warm, cool, color boost, reduce color, etc.), and maybe a handful of light-leak affects. The more simple the better. Maybe Fujifilm can even offer a service where 4″ x 6″ prints can be made and mailed out to customers who wish for an even more authentic experience.
While the size and design should still closely resemble the film version, I think the digital QuickSnap must feel a little more sturdy, and not so cheap that it would easily break if dropped. If Fujifilm could offer it for less than $100, that would be most ideal. A camera like that would be a huge hit, thanks to its nostalgic charm, ease of use, straight-out-of-camera aesthetic, and affordability.
I’ve seen a number of reviewers state that the new Fujifilm X-T50 is essentially an X100VI, but with interchangeable lenses—especially when combined with the Fujinon XF 23mm F/2 R WR. But is that really true? Is this camera and lens actually a good alternative to the Fujifilm X100VI? Let’s talk about it, and find out.
MPB is the sponsor of this article. They loaned me a Fujinon XF 23mm F/2 R WR to try out for a few weeks; however, they had no idea that I’d be using it with a Fujifilm X-T50. For those who don’t know, MPB is an online platform where you can buy, sell, or trade used photo and video gear. “At MPB, there’s something for everyone who wants to try something new, hone their skills, or pursue their passion—and it won’t cost the earth.” If you’re in the market for used camera gear, be sure to check out their platform—you can learn more about MPB here. Thank you, MPB, for making this article possible!
The premise is simple: the Fujifilm X-T50 and Fujifilm X100VI share a heck-of-a-lot of technical specs, they’re similarly sized, and, when you use the Fujinon 23mm f/2 lens on the X-T50, they have seemingly identical glass. The comparison is natural. But, if we dig deeper, it’s easy to spot some differences, too. In other words, there’s enough in common to consider them quite similar, but enough divergent that they shouldn’t be thought of as alike.
First, the similarities. Both Fujifilm cameras share the same 40mp X-Trans V sensor and processor. They both have IBIS. They use the same (old) NP-W126S batteries. They have the same film simulations. Video specs are identical. The tilting rear LCD is similar. On paper, the lenses are seemingly identical when the Fujinon 23mm f/2 is paired with the X-T50. At first glance you might think that the X-T50 is indeed an interchangeable-lens X100VI.
But there are some significant differences. Most obviously, the X100VI is rangefinder-styled, while the X-T50 is SLR-styled. The X100VI has a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, while the X-T50 has an EVF (not optical), and with a little less resolution. The X100VI has a (nearly) silent leaf shutter and built-in ND filter. The X100VI is weather-sealed (as long as you attach a filter to the lens), while the X-T50 isn’t (note: the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR lens is, in fact, weather-resistant). The X100VI has an ISO ring around the shutter knob; the X-T50 has a Film Dial. The X-T50 with the Fujinon 23mm f/2 is slightly larger than the X100VI. The X100VI is roughly $165 cheaper than the X-T50 with the Fujinon 23mm f/2 when you buy the lens used.
While the lens permanently attached to the X100VI is seemingly identical to the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR, they are actually not the same. Quite similar? Yes. Identical? No. They each have their own character. Things like lens flare, sunstars, micro-contrast, and bokeh are slightly divergent. I cannot say which is better, especially since that is subjective; personally, I like both lenses. If I didn’t own an X100VI, the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR is one that I would definitely have. Even though the characteristic of the two lenses are different, I feel like owning both is perhaps a bit redundant, unless you just really love the 35mm full-frame-equivalent focal length.
The Fujifilm X-T50 with the 23mm lens offers a similar yet divergent experience than the X100VI, but are they “close enough” for most people? Probably, especially if you cannot find an X100VI because the demand is so high currently. Overall, the X100VI is a more premium camera, and there’s a reason why it’s historically desirable. For the Fujifilm faithful, the X-T50 combined with the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR lens is not likely a sufficient-enough substitute for the X100VI; however, for the casual buyer, it probably is, and it might even make more sense, since you can interchange the lenses.
For those on a budget, you may want to consider the Fujifilm X-T30 II, which is similar to the X-T50 (however, without IBIS, fewer megapixels, and two less film simulations), but is less expensive. The Fujifilm X-T30 II combined with a used Fujinon 23mm f/2 lens will run you roughly $350 less than an X100VI, making it an excellent bargain. Yes, the X-T50 is the “better” camera, but the X-T30 II is nearly as good for significantly less money. The X-T30 II combined with the 23mm lens is more similar to the X100V than the X100VI, but most of the comparisons still apply.
I had a lot of fun photographing with the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR lens attached to a Fujifilm X-T50. It’s fantastic, a very useful focal length, and a compact size. Because I own a Fujifilm X100VI, I don’t anticipate buying the lens; however, if I didn’t have an X100-series camera, the 23mm f/2 would be essential to have in my kit. Thank you, MPB, for letting me use one for awhile!
Example pictures, captured with a Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR lens on a recent trip to New York City:
Up next in this series: Leica Q2 from the perspective of a Fujifilm fanatic
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 300 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
The brand-new Fujifilm X-T50 was just announced! It’s both surprising and intriguing. This might be Fujifilm’s most contentious model since the X-Pro3, but it shouldn’t be controversial at all. What exactly is the X-T50? Is it the right camera for you? I’ll try to answer those questions in this article.
The double-digit X-T line has traditionally been Fujifilm’s mid-level, enthusiast-grade, interchangeable-lens, SLR-styled models (that’s a mouthful!). It’s the little brother of the single-digit X-T cameras, like the X-T2 and X-T3. With the discontinuation of the low-end triple-digit X-T series, the double-digit X-T cameras have become Fujifilm’s de facto entry-level option. The Fujifilm X-T30 II, which was released in November of 2021, is the current base model, although it’s neither cheap in quality or price—it’s still a mid-tier APS-C camera.
The X-T50 is not the successor to the X-T30 II, but a whole new (yet highly similar) line. Fujifilm plans to sell the X-T30 II alongside the X-T50, similarly to what they did with the X-T3 and X-T4 a few years back. This also means that there is a potential future successor to the X-T30 II, perhaps called the X-T30 III or X-T40; I don’t know that for sure, but I think it is a fair assumption. The main thing for you to know is that the X-T50 is not a replacement for any previous model, but a whole new camera.
There are some key things that set the X-T50 apart from the X-T30 II. First is the 40mp X-Trans V sensor, the same sensor found in the X-H2, X-T5, and X100VI; the X-T30 II has the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor. Second, like the other 40mp cameras, the X-T50 has IBIS; the X-T30 II doesn’t. Perhaps the biggest difference—and the one that is most contentious—is the Film Dial. The X-T30 II has a Drive Dial on top, but in its place on the X-T50 is a brand new knob for switching between the film simulations (Drive is a button on the X-T50, like on the X100VI and X-E4). Aside from that, the X-T50 is a tad bigger than the X-T30 II, has a more rounded design, and costs quite a bit more ($1,400 for the body-only). The X-T50 is more premium than the X-T30 II, but, unsurprisingly, it’s not at the same level as the X-T5. I’d call it an upper-mid-tier model, higher than the X-T30 II but lower than the X-T5.
The Film Dial is a brilliant move by Fujifilm. I know that some may not “get it” and that’s ok; not every camera is for every person. Film simulations are such an intrinsic part of the Fujifilm experience for many users. Placing it on top of the camera in a position of importance makes film simulations a more immersive experience, one that invites exploration. The Film Dial alone will sell the X-T50; 40mp, IBIS, 6K video, etc., are merely bonuses. By simply taking an already existing and loved feature, and moving it from an Fn button or Menu position to the top plate, Fujifilm reinvented the functionality of their camera.
It’s not that the X-T50 does something that the X-T5 (or any other Fujifilm camera) doesn’t, it’s only how it is presented to the photographer. You can use the exact same Film Simulation Recipes on the X-T50 that you can on the X-T5, X100VI, and X-H2, and the analog-like output is identical between each of those models. What is unique about the X-T50 is that a turn of the Film Dial will instantly change the film-like aesthetic. That experience differentiates this cameras from all the others—not just other Fujifilm models, but from every brand. The Film Dial makes the X-T50 a “digital film” camera.
I don’t want to get too deeply into what the Film Dial is and how to get the most out of it, because I have a whole article that explains it in detail (click here). What’s important to know is that the knob only changes the film simulation and nothing else. On the dial, there are eight (out of the 20) hard-set film sims (Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Neg., and Acros), plus three customizable positions for your favorites that were left out. The “C” position simply disables the Film Dial.
If Fujifilm had asked for my input, I would have suggested a couple of changes. First, a C1-C7 Dial (or, better yet, a C1-C11 Dial, since there are 12 positions) would have been most ideal for those who use Film Simulation Recipes. That would’ve been less contentious, and I think a lot of current Fujifilm users would be excited for that; however, I understand why Fujifilm didn’t choose that route: a Film Dial is more inviting and less intimidating to the uninitiated. My advice to Fujifilm is to release an X-T55, which would be the exact same camera, but with a C1-C7 (or C1-C11) Dial in lieu of the Film Dial. Second, since they didn’t do that, I think it would have been really cool if each film simulation on the Film Dial could be customized into a Recipe. If Highlight, Shadow, Color, Dynamic Range, Grain, etc., etc., etc., could be custom set to each film sim on the Film Dial, that would be awesome. While Fujifilm could make that change with a Kaizen firmware update (and I very much hope they do), it would be surprising if they did. But, no worries, because I’ve figured out a good strategy for how to use the Film Dial as-is, and it’s highly enjoyable.
There are probably a number of people who are concerned that the X-T50 uses the “old” NP-W126 battery, and not the new NP-W235. I took this camera with me on multiple trips, and shot with it literally all day several times, and only once did I actually have to use a spare battery. So as long as you have two NP-W126 batteries, you should be good-to-go. Perhaps a second spare is a good idea if you record a lot of video footage.
So who is the Fujifilm X-T50 for? Is it worth buying? Should a different camera be considered instead? There are a few groups that the X-T50 makes a lot of sense for, and a couple of groups that I think it could potentially be a good option for.
First, the Fujifilm X-T50 is great for those who shoot film, but want to get into digital photography. With film prices so high right now, there are a number of analog photographers who are seriously considering their first digital camera. Or perhaps they haven’t picked up a digital camera in a long time because they didn’t appreciate the experience of it, and are searching for something that is more reminiscent of film photography. I can relate to this, personally. I have no doubts that it will be highly appealing to this group of people—after all, the X-T50 is Fujifilm’s “digital film” camera.
Next up are those who succumbed to the Fujifilm X100VI hype but cannot secure a camera due to the unprecedented demand. Specifically, I’m talking about those who are not current Fujifilm users—those who have a different brand of camera or perhaps no “real” camera at all currently. They will see the X-T50 as an alternative that they have a better chance at actually getting their hands on. Since most of the specs are exactly the same, it won’t take much to convince someone in this group to buy it instead of the X100VI. Obviously, there are some significant differences between the two models, but there are enough similarities that the X100VI’s demand (and Fujifilm’s inability to fulfill it) will notably fuel X-T50 sales. The X100VI’s hype is real, and, in my opinion, well deserved; the X-T50 is not an X100VI, but certainly close enough for many people.
Third, the X-T50 will be appealing to video content creators who desire streamlined color grading. The Film Dial works in video mode, and film simulations can reduce or even eliminate some editing steps. This is an underrated and underutilized aspect of Fujifilm cameras that I think will be employed more on the X-T50 simply because of the Film Dial.
Then there are Fujifilm X-T5 owners who want a smaller and lighter option—but with an identical output—to be a companion camera. Some might appreciate the divergent shooting experience, while others might not. I think, for this group, the X-T50 is contentions, and either you’re intrigued by it or put off, and your opinion has likely already been made.
The last group are those who have an older double-digit X-T camera, or perhaps even a triple-digit model, and are eager to upgrade to something brand-new. The X-T5 is a little too big, heavy, and/or expensive for you, while the X-T30 II doesn’t have the latest two film simulations or features like 6K video and IBIS. If you appreciate the Film Dial, the X-T50 could be perfect; otherwise, this might not be the double-digital X-T camera that you were wishing for.
I really like the Fujifilm X-T50, personally. It’s fun, and offers a divergent experience from the other retro-inspired models. But, no camera is perfect, and none are for everyone. Each person has their own preferences. I think the X-T50 will, generally speaking, appeal more to non-Fujifilm photographers than current Fujifilm owners. On one hand, that’s really good. The X-T50 will be a lot of people’s gateway into Fujifilm. On the other hand, there are plenty of people who will complain that Fujifilm should have designed it another way. I do wish that the new knob had been implemented just a little differently, but I completely understand why they did it. Just because this camera might be more well-received by those buying their first Fujifilm model, doesn’t mean that current Fujifilm enthusiasts can’t or won’t like it, too, because I think many will (I enjoyed it); however, there are some who definitely won’t.
The Fujifilm X-T50 is brilliant, as it blurs the line a little between digital and analog, and gives users a unique photography experience. I have no doubts that the Fujifilm X-T50 will be a huge success, and the new Film Dial will be a big reason for it.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and over 300 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Yesterday’s Fuji X Weekly + Nuzira collaborative Fujifilm photowalk in Scottsdale, Arizona, was a huge success! Altogether, 16 people showed up, including myself and Lucas White of Nuzira. It was a great group of photographers, and I think everyone had a good time. Most were local to the Phoenix metro area, but three came from Ohio and one from South Dakota—they were in the area, and it just happened to work out that they could attend. It was such an honor to co-lead everyone through Old Town Scottsdale!
The weather cooperated wonderfully, but it didn’t initially seem like it was going to. May is typically a hot month—the average high temperature right now is 90° Fahrenheit; however, a cool-front passed through shortly before the photowalk, which kept it at a more reasonable 82° at the start, and 77° by the end. Because of the frontal system, the wind howled most of the day, and clouds covered the sky. Just as the photowalk was about to begin, the wind calmed and the clouds cleared, revealing endless blue. Really, it couldn’t have been better.
Most people had an X100-series camera, ranging from an X100T to the new X100VI. The other cameras I saw were an X-T100, X-T20, X-E4, X-S10, X-S20, X-Pro3, and X-T5. The camera I brought was my X100VI, which is perfect for walk-around photography. Lucas had a bag full of gear, which he graciously let anyone try out if they wanted. Fujifilm provided some stickers and pins to give away, and Sigma provided multi-use tools (screwdriver/wrench/bottle-opener, etc., combo) with their logo.
The Film Simulation Recipes that I used for the photowalk were Kodak Portra 400 v2, Kodachrome 64, Kodak Tri-X 400, and two upcoming Recipes that have not yet been published, one based on Nostalgic Neg. and the other on Reala Ace. As we were walking around, I was stopped by someone who recognized that I had a Fujifilm camera, but seemed only vaguely familiar. “I’ve heard about those,” he stated. “Can I see some of the pictures?” So I showed him the images I had just captured on the photowalk. “It’s just like the Reels!” He took note of the camera name, said “thanks” and walked away.
It was great to meet everyone who attended, and have some face-to-face conversations about Fujifilm gear, Film Simulation Recipes, and photography. Every time I looked around, I noticed that those in attendance were talking with each other; it was great to help facilitate community. Fujifilm cameras and Recipes seem to bring people together.
I want to give a big “thank you” to those who came out and joined us! I appreciate you taking time out of your busy day to meet up, chat, and photograph. I hope to see everyone again sometime in the future!
Back in 2018, I briefly owned a Fujifilm X-Pro2. I loved that camera! It was so much fun, and the perfect compliment to my Fujifilm X100F. To this day it remains my absolute favorite interchangeable-lens model by Fujifilm that I’ve ever purchased. Unfortunately, I had to sell it.
You see, I didn’t have a lot of money back then to spend on (what was at the time) my hobby. I’m sure that many of you can relate. I found a good deal on a used X-Pro2, but I really couldn’t afford it. Using PayPal credit, I was able to hold onto the camera for about six months, but when the interest came due, I had to let it go. I had high hopes that I could find a way to keep it, but it just didn’t work out. The day that I mailed the X-Pro2 off to its new owner was a sad one (although I’m sure it was quite happy for them). I’ve thought about that camera—and the summer of 2018 when I briefly owned it—many times since. I’ve often wondered if I’d like it just as much today as I did then.
Thankfully, the kind folks at MPB, who are fans of Fuji X Weekly and Film Simulation Recipes, provided me with the opportunity to find out. MPB is the sponsor of this article—this is the first ever sponsored post on this website, by the way—and they loaned me a Fujifilm X-Pro2 to try out for two weeks. For those who don’t know, MPB is an online platform where you can buy, sell, or trade used photo and video gear. “At MPB, there’s something for everyone who wants to try something new, hone their skills, or pursue their passion—and it won’t cost the earth.” If you’re in the market for used camera gear, be sure to check out their website—you can learn more about MPB here. Thank you, MPB, for making this article possible!
Fujifilm released the X-Pro2 eight years ago, in 2016. It’s a rangefinder-styled 24mp APS-C mirrorless camera with a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder. The X-Pro2, which resembles a classic film camera, is rock-solid, and feels like it could last forever, even if you tossed it around a little. In my opinion, the X-Pro series is one of the most beautifully designed camera lines of all time. The X-Pro2 was an instant classic when it was newly released, and will continue to be for many years to come.
I chose the specific Fujifilm X-Pro2 that I wanted to borrow from the MPB website the same as if I were buying it. When the box arrived in the mail, the camera was exactly as the website described. The camera functioned like it was brand-new; the body had a few minor signs of wear, which I was well aware of due to the gear-specific ‘cosmetic condition’ rating displayed on the platform. There were no surprises, and I got precisely what I was expecting to get. Did I mention that the X-Pro2 is a beautiful camera?
When I had the X-Pro2 back in 2018, I brought it along with me on some epic roadtrips. It went with me to the Black Hills in South Dakota. It traveled with me through Colorado and New Mexico, including The Great Sand Dunes and Taos. I have many great memories associated with the X-Pro2. Was how I felt more about those adventures than the camera itself? Or was the camera truly that great?
As I was removing the X-Pro2 from the box, many of those memories came flooding back. It was a great joy to hold it once again. This time, I wouldn’t be able to take it on any roadtrips. Would I feel the same without some travel experiences to go along with the camera? I wondered what I would think about the X-Pro2 all these years later—would it hold up to the test of time?
Back in 2018, I mostly used three lenses with the X-Pro2: Fujinon 60mm f/2.4, Fujinon 16mm f/1.4, and Meike 35mm f/1.7. Of those three, the only one that I still own is the Meike, so I used it extensively during the two weeks that I had the X-Pro2. I also tried a Helios 44-2, Pentax-110 50mm f/2.8, and 7Artisans 35mm f/0.95. Each of those four lenses have unique characteristics and strengths. The X-Pro2 is especially fun to pair with vintage and manual lenses, and I very much enjoyed that approach with it.
I shoot JPEGs, and rarely edit my pictures (aside from some cropping/straightening). I found that this approach works very well for me. The photographs in this article are all camera-made JPEGs that are not post-processed. The Film Simulation Recipes that I used with the camera six years ago were mainly Kodachrome II, Dramatic Classic Chrome, Vintage Agfacolor, Acros, Acros Push Process, and Agfa Scala. A few of those pictures remain personal favorites to this day.
Above: My Fujifilm X-Pro2 photos from 2018.
For this project, the seven Recipes that I programmed into the C1-C7 Custom Presets on the X-Pro2 were Kodachrome II, Kodak Gold 200, Kodacolor, Classic Kodak, Color Negative, Provia Slide, and Acros. The Kodachrome II and Acros Recipes require the same White Balance type but different White Balance Shifts, so I used the Kodachrome II shift with the Acros Recipe; however, towards the end of the project I replaced Kodachrome II with Analog Monochrome, and switched the Acros WB Shift to be correct for that Recipe. You cannot program a WB Shift into the X-Pro2’s C1-C7 presets (like you can with newer Fujifilm models), but if each Recipe uses a different WB type (or share the same WB type and WB Shift), you don’t have to remember to adjust the WB Shift when changing Custom Presets, and you get a better user experience.
When reviewing the pictures after I returned the camera, I discovered that the Film Simulation Recipes I had used the most were Provia Slide, Acros, Kodak Gold 200, Kodachrome II, and Kodacolor (in that order). Provia Slide is a brand-new Recipe that I created on the X-Pro2, and it wouldn’t exist if MPB hadn’t loaned me the camera, and is a very positive side effect of their sponsorship. I’m quite happy with how several of these images turned out, even if I only had the local sights to capture.
Using Film Simulation Recipes on the Fujifilm X-Pro2 provides a film-like shooting experience and output, especially when combined with vintage or manual lenses. It’s an analog approach with the convenience of digital. Since the pictures don’t need to be edited, you can download them straight from the camera using WiFi and immediately share them—or send them off to be printed—right from your phone. That can save you a lot of time and hassle, while making the process more enjoyable and authentic.
Above: My Fujifilm X-Pro2 photos from 2024.
It was once again heartbreaking to mail off the Fujifilm X-Pro2. I very much wanted to keep it. The camera is just as great in 2024 as it was in 2018. I can’t help but think that 20 years from now the X-Pro2 will be sought after for the photographic experience and picture aesthetic that it provides. There aren’t very many digital cameras you can say that about. I feel like in today’s age where new camera models are constantly being released, and photographers just have to have the latest-and-greatest, it’s easy to overlook legendary cameras like the X-Pro2. And I do very much mean that the Fujifilm X-Pro2 is legendary—those who own it already know it, and those who don’t haven’t yet discovered it.
Will I buy a Fujifilm X-Pro2, this time to keep? I’d love to and I hope to, but I already own way too many cameras, so I’d first need to part ways with at least a couple that I rarely use. The X-Pro2 is extremely tempting. I don’t have an answer one way or the other yet, but the X-Pro2 is one that I certainly wish that I had.
Grab your Fujifilm camera and join myself and Lucas White of Nuzira THIS Sunday, May 5th, for a free photowalk in Scottsdale, Arizona! Meet us at the Arizona Canal South Bridge promenade near the Pinball Wizard Public Art display at 5:30 PM. Explore the blending of modern cosmopolitan with off-beat western heritage through pictures. There will be the potential for street/urban, architecture, automobile, and landscape photography. It will be an opportunity to meet fellow Fujifilm photographers, and to chat about Fujifilm gear, film simulations, and Film Simulation Recipes. We’re going to have lots of fun!
If you think you might attend, please RSVP by May 3rd (click here). If you are in the area, I really hope to meet you there!
Come join Ritchie Roesch of Fuji X Weekly and Lucas White of Nuzira on Sunday, May 5th, for an epic photowalk around Old Town Scottsdale, Arizona! Bring your Fujifilm gear to the Arizona Canal South Bridge promenade near the Pinball Wizard Public Art display at 5:30 PM. Explore the blending of modern cosmopolitan with off-beat western heritage through pictures. There will be the potential for street/urban, architecture, automobile, and landscape photography. It will be an opportunity to meet fellow Fujifilm photographers, and to chat about Fujifilm gear, film simulations, and Film Simulation Recipes. We’re going to have lots of fun!
Please RSVP by May 3rd so that we know how many are coming. Click here for more details and to RSVP. If you’re in the area, I hope to see you on May 5th from 5:30 to 7 PM for this Fujifilm-centric event! This photowalk is free, and family-friendly.
Join me on a free Fujifilm-centric photowalk on Sunday, May 5th, in Old Town Scottsdale, Arizona, at 5:30 PM. Explore the blending of modern cosmopolitan with off-beat western heritage through pictures. There will be the potential for street/urban, architecture, automobile, and landscape photography. It will be an opportunity to meet fellow Fujifilm photographers, and to chat about Fujifilm gear, film simulations, and Film Simulation Recipes.
Mark your calendars now! More details coming soon, so stay tuned.
Recently, a lot of people have asked me which Fujifilm cameras do I recommend. Should they buy an X100VI? X-T5? X-H2? X-S20? You get the idea. This is an impossible question for me to answer because it is personal; what I might like in a camera you might dislike, as each person’s needs, experiences, and priorities are different. Still, I’ll try to give some thoughtful answers.
To make this even more challenging, some Fujifilm cameras are difficult to get. As the saying goes, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Should you patiently wait for the Fujifilm X100VI? Or should you get an X-T30 II or X-T5 instead? I cannot tell you what you should or shouldn’t do, I can only offer my opinions, which should be taken with a grain of salt.
I learned photography during the film era, and used full-manual cameras for many years. Because of this, PASM mode-dial cameras never made sense to me and were always an awkward experience. Fujifilm’s retro designs and tactile controls are like home to me. For this reason, I’m not personally a big fan of the Fujifilm’s models that trade those for mode dials, such as the X-S10, X-S20, X-H2, and X-H2s. This is not to say that those are bad cameras (because they’re not), only that they’re not for me—you might, in fact, love them very much.
This article is specifically about new cameras, and not models that have been discontinued and are now only available used. I might make a part two that covers used models; there are so many to choose from, that’s a different beast altogether. For the sake of simplicity, I’m just talking about what is currently available brand-new.
Now, let’s get to it!
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Best Overall: Fujifilm X-T5
Whether you are a photographer, videographer, or both, the Fujifilm X-T5 is the top allrounder. It’s Fujifilm’s most premium model with retro tactile controls. It has a 40mp X-Trans V sensor, IBIS, weather-sealing, dual-card slots—just excellent specs. There’s so much to love about this camera, but no camera is perfect; however, this is in my opinion the closest to perfect among the current interchangeable-lens options. I’ve been using mine for about a year-and-a-half now, and still really enjoying it.
The Fujifilm X-T30 II is currently Fujifilm’s most entry-level model, but don’t be fooled: this camera is highly capable. It has a 26mp X-Trans IV sensor, which is my personal favorite Fujifilm sensor generation. It’s not as feature rich as other models—it doesn’t have IBIS, weather-sealing, or dual-card slots—but it is more than good enough for most people, especially if you plan to use it more for still photography than video. The X-T30 II can sometimes be difficult to find—it was purportedly discontinued at one point, but new copies seem to appear now and then. If you have less than $1,000 to spend, the X-T30 II is definitely your best bet.
The Fujifilm X100VI is the camera that everyone wants but few can actually get. It’s the wildly successful successor to the X100V, which was also hard to find after it became a social-media sensation two-and-a-half years after it was initially released. The X100VI has a 40mp X-Trans V sensor, IBIS, and is (for the most part) weather-sealed. It has great stats; most importantly, it’s a lot of fun to use. The fixed lens, leaf shutter, built-in ND filter, and relatively compact size make it a joy to use. My wife gifted me an X100V for my birthday four years ago; just three weeks ago my X100VI arrived in the mail—these are my desert island cameras, and if I could only have one for the rest of my life, I’d be quite happy with either one of them. If you can get one, in my opinion it’s worth doing so; however, they’re definitely not for everyone, so only you can determine if you’ll appreciate it or not. Aside from that, the X100VI is not easy to get, and you might have to wait awhile for one to become available.
You might have noticed that I began including affiliate links for Nuzira. Most likely you’ve never heard of them, so let me introduce you—it’s actually a fascinating story.
Located at 9420 East Doubletree Ranch Road—a nondescript industrial business park in Scottsdale, Arizona—is Nuzira. Walking in the door to Suite 107, I was immediately greeted by Lollipop, a kind and gentle dog with a short tail that wags quickly. As I stepped inside, I shook hands Lucas, who has a warm smile and an affinity for fedoras. This isn’t a typical camera store.
Nuzira began in 2009 when Lucas and Jennifer White, a husband-and-wife team, began supplying materials for government contracts. When certain agencies, such as the U.S. military, need specific items that they don’t normally have on hand, Nuzira can find and supply those. They’re a purchaser, a middleman between manufacturers and organizations. One day, they were contracted to provide some videography equipment, and that was an aha moment for them. You see, Lucas and Jennifer are hobby photographers, and they thought, why don’t we sell cameras? Why not include their personal passion in their business? So they decided that their company could also be a camera store.
Lucas and Jennifer put together an e-commerce website—Nuzira.com—as their main storefront. Their driving philosophy is to empower creators to thrive, and they have some big ideas for how to achieve that. While Nuzira has been around for 15 years, they’ve been a camera store for less than one, and a lot of their plans are still developing, and will take time to become reality. After speaking with Lucas, I have no doubts that it will get there. Their mission to foster a community of visual enthusiasts is in the early stages, but expect it to grow into something substantial.
Going back to Suite 107 in Scottsdale, Nuzira doesn’t look like a camera store. The front door opens to a small waiting room that is also the receiving room, where UPS, FedEx, and other curriers are the regulars. Next to that is a shipping room, where packages are prepared for transport. In the back are a couple of storage and supply rooms—the warehouse. To the right of the front door is Lucas and Jennifer’s office, which is currently doubling as the physical Nuzira store. You can walk in and buy cameras and lenses and accessories, but it’s not necessarily a good place to browse. It is, however, a great place to discuss photography with Lucas, who loves to talk shop. And if you need something specific, he might just have it in stock. One day they will have a more proper store, Lucas told me, but they’re still working out the details.
Nuzira is an authorized Fujifilm dealer. Both Lucas and Jennifer primarily use Fujifilm gear for their own photography, so that’s mostly what they carry. They also sell products by Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, Blackmagic, Manfrotto, NiSi, and more. Largely, though, it’s Fujifilm stuff. If you are anywhere in the U.S. and are buying Fujifilm gear, Nuzira.com is a great option. If you are in the Phoenix area, consider stopping in—Lollipop will give you a friendly greeting, and Lucas will be very happy to talk cameras with you.
My Fujifilm X100VI arrived in the mail yesterday. Eagerly I opened the box, pulled out the X100V (but with an “I” after the “V”), placed a freshly charged battery inside, inserted an SD Card, programmed my C1-C7 custom settings presets, and went out shooting. The main reason why I wanted the X100VI was for the brand-new Reala Ace film simulation. I think a big reason why Fujifilm cameras are so in-demand right now are the film simulations and the many Film Simulation Recipes that can achieve various film-like looks straight-out-of-camera, no editing needed. Anytime that Fujifilm adds a new film sim is a good time, and is always a top reason for myself to spend money on a new camera that I don’t actually need.
My very first impression of the X100VI is that it’s an X100V. The two models are identical twins at initial glance. That’s not a bad thing whatsoever, because I absolutely love my X100V; if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. The new camera is slightly heavier (but, really, you need to have one in each hand to be able to tell), and there’s a small amount of noise when you shake the X100VI due to the IBIS inside, but otherwise there’s not a lot to distinguish the two apart. Internally, the new camera has IBIS (which I haven’t had a chance to test yet since I only used it in bright daylight so far), the 40mp X-Trans V sensor and processor, and the latest JPEG options, including Eterna Bleach Bypass, Nostalgic Neg., and Reala Ace—all of which are the largest distinctions between the old and new versions.
I tried Reala Ace right away. The new film simulation was named after Fujicolor Superia Reala Ace 100 color negative film, a version of Fujicolor Superia Reala 100 that was only sold in Japan. Reala was introduced in the late-1990’s and discontinued in 2013, and was the first Superia film (although initially it didn’t have Superia in the name), the first with their 4th emulsion layer. The Classic Negative film simulation, which is closely modeled after Superia film, is the best way to replicate Reala on your Fujifilm camera; specifically, try my Fujicolor Reala 100 Film Simulation Recipe. My Reala Ace Recipe was intended to mimic the new Reala Ace film sim using Classic Negative, but it can also be thought of as a v2 for replicating Fujicolor Reala film. Unfortunately, the new Reala Ace film simulation is not modeled after the film that it was named after.
When there are not many example photographs of a new film sim, there’s not a lot to go on for replicating it. It’s impossible to know if the samples are straight-out-of-camera with everything set to factory defaults, or if some of the parameters were adjusted, or if post-editing was done, unless the photographer discloses that. When Reala Ace was introduced on the GFX100 II, I believe that many of the samples that initially came out were post-edited to some degree (one photographer did specifically state that their’s was), and that makes sense since most GFX owners are not shooting SOOC JPEGs. My Reala Ace Recipe is probably as close as one can get to the Reala Ace film sim using Classic Negative, and is more similar to the actual film than the Reala Ace film sim is; overall, my Recipe is only a so-so match to the new film sim, and is off in several aspects.
My Reala Ace Film Simulation Recipe
Default Reala Ace film sim, except DR200, Grain Weak/Small & High ISO NR -4
Fujifilm placed the Reala Ace film simulation right above PRO Neg. Hi in the film sim list, and I quickly discovered why. The two PRO Neg. film simulations are not closely modeled after any emulsions, but are generally inspired by Fujifilm’s PRO lines of film, such as PRO 160S, PRO 160NS, PRO 160C, and PRO 400H. The main difference between PRO Neg. Hi and PRO Neg. Std is that the Hi version has more contrast and saturation, and the Std version has less. Reala Ace is quite similar to both PRO Neg. Std and PRO Neg. Hi, and you can more-or-less approximate the Reala Ace film sim with either. I found that PRO Neg. Std is actually the best option for replicating Reala Ace, so if your camera has PRO Neg. Std, you pretty much have Reala Ace. Fujifilm should have named the new film sim PRO Neg. C, since it is the third version of PRO Neg. (“C” is the third letter in the alphabet), and the emulsion that the new film sim is most similar to is Fujicolor PRO 160C (and not Reala).
To get close to Reala Ace (PRO Neg. C) using PRO Neg. Std, make these adjustments: – For Reala Ace, I set both Highlight and Shadow to -0.5. Additionally, I used DR200, Grain Weak/Small, and High ISO NR -4; otherwise, everything else was factory defaults (Off, Auto, or 0). – For PRO Neg. Std, I set Highlight to +1, Shadow to -0.5, Color to +2, Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak, DR200, and Grain Weak/Small; otherwise, everything else was factory defaults (Off, Auto, or 0). You might question why, for example, I didn’t keep Reala Ace at Highlight/Shadow 0, and on PRO Neg. Std simply adjust Highlight to +1.5? I tried that, but for whatever reason, the changes I made are an ever-so-slightly closer match. Both are acceptable, though.
Can you guess which is Reala Ace (PRO Neg. C) and which is PRO Neg. Std in the sets below, Pic 1 or Pic 2?
Pic 1
Pic 2
Pic 1
Pic 2
Pic 1
Pic 2
There are, of course, some small differences. Reala Ace renders blue slightly deeper, but applying Color Chrome FX Blue Weak to PRO Neg. Std is a little too much to exactly match; CCEB Extra-Weak would be perfect, but that doesn’t exist. A WB Shift of -0.5 Blue (-1 Blue is too much) to PRO Neg. Std would be good if you could; I used Auto WB, but if you used Kelvin instead, you could try something like 5100K on PRO Neg. Std to replicate 5000K on Reala Ace. Setting Color to +2.5 on PRO Neg. Std would be great, but that doesn’t exist, either. There are small differences in both Highlight and Shadow rendering, but you’d need 0.25 adjustments to more accurately match them. There is a level of fine-tuning required to precisely replicate Reala Ace that’s not available on Fujifilm cameras, but you can get pretty darn close nonetheless.
The larger point is that if you want a Reala Ace (PRO Neg. C) film simulation look, all you really need is PRO Neg. Std. Simply increase Highlight by +1 and Color by +2 and you’re pretty much there—a little more fine-tuning can get you slightly closer. You can’t 100% match them, but you can get pretty darn close—nobody would be able to tell without a side-by-side comparison, and even then it’s not completely obvious without studying closely.
Reala Ace film simulation
For those still wondering which is which in the photos above, Pic 1 in each set is PRO Neg. Std, and Pic 2 is Reala Ace. You can spot the differences when you know what to look for, but otherwise they’re very similar. Reala Ace is a little nicer at factory defaults than PRO Neg. Std, perhaps more like PRO Neg. Std that has been adjusted into a Film Simulation Recipe. I think there is potential for some new Recipes utilizing Reala Ace as the base; overall, I prefer my Reala Ace Recipe that uses Classic Negative. I am looking forward to seeing what can be done with the new film sim, so expect some Reala Ace (PRO Neg. C) Recipes soon!
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
My Fujifilm X100VI preorder was completed six minutes after the camera went live at the the top of the hour during the X Summit. It didn’t ship today. The store that I ordered from is not saying when it might ship, only that it could be weeks or months. I’m not worried or upset, though.
I’m guessing that many of you might be in the same boat as me. I’m sure some reading this didn’t preorder the new camera, but, with record-demand (not just for a Fujifilm model… the X100VI apparently had more preorders than any other camera by any brand ever), it’s a safe bet that many of you did order it. If you weren’t super quick (I thought I was, but obviously wasn’t quick enough), your order likely didn’t ship today. I’m sure that some of you did, in fact, receive a notice today that yours has shipped, and even a few of you might already have it in your possession. That’s awesome! Enjoy your new camera. For the rest of us, it’s easy to feel empty or even envious. If you preordered the X100VI but your copy wasn’t in the first batch, let me give you some reasons not to be dismayed.
First, in time, you’ll get your new camera. Just be patient. The hype will subside, new copies will be made, and it will get to you before you know it. Waiting a few weeks or months is not a big deal. Yes, we’re used to everything being instant. But a little delay won’t hurt you. Just take a deep breath in and out, and let the FOMO go. Know that it’s going to work out alright, and before you know it you’ll be shooting with the new model.
Second, the X100VI won’t be a night-and-day difference from your other Fujifilm gear. It likely is an upgrade, but it’s not going to be a massive upgrade, unless you’re coming from an early X-series model. Keeping expectations in check will not only help limit disappointments, but also help with patience.
Third, whatever camera you do have already, it’s plenty good enough. It’s a positive exercise to go back to the old reviews of your gear and read the glowing praise, which serves as a reminder that the cameras we own are actually pretty darn good. New gear won’t make you a better photographer. A camera like the X100VI can be a lot of fun, and sometimes that enjoyment can motivate us to use our gear more; however, there are plenty of ways to find renewed enjoyment from our old gear, such as trying different Film Simulation Recipes, using vintage lenses, or simply taking it on adventures.
So if you’re feeling disappointed that you’ll have to wait a bit longer for your new camera, I hope that this helps you feel a little better. A little patience will help ease your anxiousness, and a little fresh air is good for the spirit. So grab your current camera, whatever it is, and go out right now and shoot with it.
If you didn’t order the new Fujifilm X100VI but would like to, you’ll likely have a significant wait, but eventually it will be in stock.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
