Fujifilm cameras | FUJI X WEEKLY

The Fujifilm Charm — Create With Us Recap

Posted on September 30 by Ritchie Roesch

*Me, at Create With Us, During Setup* – Minneapolis, MN – Fujifilm X-E5 – 1970’s Summer

I returned home late last night from Fujifilm’s Create With Us event in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This was their third annual Create With Us—I was fortunate to be at the last one, too, which was in Austin, Texas. It was a very quick trip: I flew out Saturday evening, and the returning flight landed just before midnight on Sunday. It was a whirlwind, but I’m so glad that I got to be a part of it.

Fujifilm assigned me three jobs: assist with a Fujifilm X-E5 and X-T50 touch-and-try station, cohost a Tech Talk with Christopher Gilbert, and lead a photowalk. The topic of the Tech Talk was straight-out-of-camera photography. Christopher and I discussed the various Film Simulations, how to set up a Film Simulation Recipe in the camera, and how to reprocess a RAW file using the in-camera RAW converter. It was a fun experience, and hopefully educational for those in the audience (the next Tech Talk is on Wednesday, October 1st).

*Rooftop View* – Minneapolis, MN – Fujifilm X-E5 – Kodak Vericolor VPS

The photowalk was great. It was supposed to be limited to 15 attendees, plus myself and two assistants (someone from Fujifilm, and a local photographer), and two models. We ended up with over 25 people in total (including myself, the two assistants, and the two models). The new Fujifilm North America CEO Ryuichi “Richie” Matoba (forgive me if his official title is not exactly that) also attended. He was the CEO of Fujifilm Australia, but as of a month ago Richie was given the reins of the North America office. It was an incredible honor to have him join the photowalk! I didn’t get a chance to talk much with him, but I would love an opportunity for a longer conversation (I have a lot of feedback and ideas), should he happen to read this.

It was an honor to photograph with and meet in-person all those who attended the photowalk. The two models were great, too. I’m grateful for those who stopped by the touch-and-try booth to say hello. It was a really good event, and I’m sure all who attended can attest to that. If there’s ever a Create With Us event near you in the future, be sure to attend—it’s well worth whatever effort it takes to get there.

*Eterna 55* – Minneapolis, MN – Fujifilm X-E5 – Kodak Pro 400

The only camera I brought with me was my Fujifilm X-E5. This is such a great travel camera, and for a quick there-and-back adventure, I really didn’t need anything else. I especially appreciate that you can program up to 11 Recipes into the X-E5. I attached the new Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 pancake lens to the camera, and also brought along a Pentax-110 50mm f/2.8 lens and adapter for a second option. One spare battery, which I didn’t even use, rounded out the kit.

Probably the most interesting thing that I learned at Create With Us was from a somewhat off-handed comment from a Fujifilm employee. It would have been really easy to overlook what was said. I don’t think it was intended to be interpreted as an official statement, but I was fascinated by it, so I want to share it with you: “Each sensor generation has its own unique charm. Some people like the Provia rendering of X-Trans I, some people like the Velvia rendering of X-Trans II—each one is different.” I might not have the quote 100% correct, but that’s the gist of it.

*Eterna Demo* – Minneapolis, MN – Fujifilm X-E5 – Cinematic Film

The insinuation was (at least as I understood it when it was said) is that the small differences in image rendering between sensor generations, and even the much more subtle differences camera-to-camera within the same sensor generation, is intentional and even a feature. It’s kind of like when an emulsion is updated, it looks slightly different than it used to; one person might prefer the “old” version of the film, while another might prefer the updated iteration. For example, when Kodak went from the second to third generation of Kodachome in 1974, some photographers liked the change, and some (like William Eggleston) didn’t. If you preferred the old version of Kodachrome, you were soon out of luck once it sold out. Fujifilm cameras are a different story because you can still buy the old models on the second-hand market. You can find and use the one with the charm that you most prefer. Maybe that’s the X-Pro1. Perhaps it’s the X-T1. It could be the X100F. Possibly it’s the X-E4. Maybe it’s the X-T50. Or some other camera. It’s up to you to find the one that you especially love, and the intention is that you’ll continue making photographs with it for a long time, and not just for a couple of years until the next iteration is released.

The specific hardware and software in the camera plays a role in the image rendering. It would be extraordinarily difficult to 100% match the output of various sensors and processors. You can get very, very close, though; however, 100% exactly matching is not quite possible. That’s certainly a part of it. Maybe you don’t want to perfectly match the output anyway, if it would require ignoring a benefit of the updated technology. It could be that the new technology allows the programmers to better achieve the intended results, which were less possible with the older technology. Perhaps the vision of what those results should be has been tweaked a little over time. All of that is a factor. But that’s not the point that was made: each Fujifilm camera generation has its own unique quality, which was purposefully crafted, and you might especially like the particular charm of one more than the others. Since they’re not all perfectly identical, you get to decide which is your favorite.

Above: Fujifilm X-E5 — Kodak Tri-X 400 — Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport, Arizona

My personal favorite is the fourth generation. I think the JPEG output of the X100V, X-T4, and X-E4 (I own those specific models) is special. The fifth generation, which has the advantage of Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace, is a very close second-favorite for me. There’s an obvious difference in output between those two generations, most notable (but not limited to) how deeply blue is rendered on some film simulations. Whether you prefer either of those two generations—or a different one entirely—is up to you; I really like the output from the Fujifilm X-Pro2, for example.

We’re all unique. Each of us have our own unique styles. We all have our own tastes. As the saying goes: Different strokes for different folks. The beauty of Fujifilm’s approach is that no X-series camera generation is objectively better than another. Each one might be considered subjectively better, just depending on who you ask, but they each have their own charm. You might even prefer certain aspects of one and certain aspects of another, and use both.

Above: Fujifilm X-E5 — Superia Negative — Minneapolis, Minnesota

When it comes to other brands, for the most part you really don’t hear people talk about the picture charm of various models. People don’t discuss the image quality magic of (say) the Canon Rebel T7i or debate which Sony A6000 series model has the best picture profile rendering. This seems more exclusive to Fujifilm, and it’s because Fujifilm intended each iteration to have a unique allure, which sparks the discussions and debates, but more importantly it provides an avenue to connect with and really love the gear you use.

Below are the photographs that I captured on the Create With Us photowalk in Minneapolis with my Fujifilm X-E5.

*Fujifilm X-E5 & Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 — Kodak Portra 400 v2*

*Fujifilm X-E5 & Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 — Superia Negative*

*Fujifilm X-E5 & Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 — Kodachrome 64*

*Fujifilm X-E5 & Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 — Nostalgic Film*

*Fujifilm X-E5 & Pentax-110 50mm f/2.8 — Superia Negative*

*Fujifilm X-E5 & Pentax-110 50mm f/2.8 — Kodak Portra 400 v2*

*Fujifilm X-E5 & Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 — Xpro ’62*

*Fujifilm X-E5 & Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 — Kodak Tri-X 400*

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X-E5 in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-E5 in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira

Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

Let’s Talk About X-Trans VI

Posted on September 3 by Ritchie Roesch

In my estimation, the next generation of Fujifilm cameras is right around the corner, likely to be announced early next year. I’ll tell you why I think that, and I’ll take some guesses at what X-Trans VI could look like—what might be different on the next generation of X-series cameras.

Fujifilm’s generational lifespan for the X-series is about three years. Some are a little longer, some are a little shorter. X-Trans I had the shortest lifespan of only about one year, or maybe two years, depending on how you classify the X-M1, which had an X-Trans I sensor paired with X-Trans II processor. Otherwise, though, three or three-and-a-half years is the average. Even though the X-S20 and X-M5 (and likely the X-T30 III when it is announced soon) have an X-Trans IV sensor, I consider them fifth generation cameras because they have the X-Processor 5 and everything that goes with that—they have some notable similarities to the other fifth generation models (the X-M1, on the other hand, had notable dissimilarities with X-Trans II models). The X-H2/X-H2s kicked off X-Trans V a little over three years ago, so we’re due for the next generation.

Fujifilm has been using the X-E series as a marker for the end of an X-Trans generation—not as the last camera, but as the second-to-last. The X-E1 was the second-to-last X-Trans I camera, with the X-M1 as the last; the X-E2s was released simultaneously with the X70, the last two X-Trans II cameras; the X-E3 was the second-to-last X-Trans III model, with only the X-H1 following; the X-E4 was the second-to-last X-Trans IV release (not including the X-S20 and X-M5), with the X-T30 II as the last. The Fujifilm X-E5 will most likely continue this pattern, and be the second-to-last fifth-generation model, with only the upcoming X-T30 III following. I think it’s safe to say, based on past patterns, that 2025 will be the final year for the fifth-generation, and the sixth-generation will kick off in 2026.

Fujifilm often announces cameras in January/February, which are shipped in February/March. There’s a reasonable chance that will continue; however, not every year sees a camera released at the very beginning. A spring announcement with a late-spring, early-summer release is also common. My best guess is that the first sixth generation camera will be announced on or before the end of May, but probably sooner. Keep in mind this is merely a guess and nothing more.

What will X-Trans VI look like? I think it will be more about speed and efficiency than resolution. X-Trans takes a lot more computing power than Bayer, which not only puts a strain on the processor, but can also be more prone to heat dispersion issues. By emphasizing speed and efficiency improvements, Fujifilm can minimize some of the drawbacks to X-Trans. Besides, 40mp is already more than enough resolution for the format. I’m not sure if Fujifilm plans to continue using the same sensors and just upgrade the processor, or if we’ll see new sensors, too—or maybe a mix. Or it could be that we’ll see “new” sensors that have identical specs to the old ones, with small design improvements.

Sony makes Fujifilm’s camera sensors, as they do for many camera companies. If Fujifilm wants a partially-stacked 40mp APS-C sensor, Sony has to be willing to manufacture and sell it to Fujifilm. I think such a sensor would be well received in an X-H3 and X-T6, and would help to address speed and efficiency. Would Sony make that sensor, and how much more will it cost than the non-stacked version? That’s a good question. I think there is potential for some cameras to have a partially-stacked 40mp sensor (X-H3 and X-T6), and some to have a non-stacked 40mp sensor (for example, X-T60 and X-E6).

What about the X-H3s? Will it continue with the 26mp stacked sensor? If the X-H3 has a partially-stacked sensor, that might narrow the gap sufficiently for Fujifilm to discontinue the X-H2s line altogether. I think it’s possible that Fujifilm offers some small under-the-hood improvements along with the X-Processor 6, and simply call it the X-H2s II (basically, a very minor update). I also think it’s possible that Fujifilm replaces the X-H2s with an X-series version of the upcoming GFX Eterna cinema camera. I’m not sure how well the X-H2 and X-H2s have sold, and if Fujifilm feels that both models are justified in the new generation. If there’s one camera potentially on the chopping block, it’s likely either the X-H2 or the X-H2s; however, my guess is that they both continue, unless an “X Eterna” model is introduced as a sort-of replacement for the X-H2s.

I also wonder if Fujifilm will continue to use the X-Trans IV sensor into the sixth generation. As far as I know, Sony doesn’t offer any APS-C sensor in-between the 26mp that X-Trans IV is built on and the 40mp that X-Trans V is built on. Maybe Sony has been developing (say) a 32mp sensor behind the scenes; after all, Fujifilm was the first and (so far) only customer of the 40mp sensor, so it could happen with another one. If so, Fujifilm would move beyond the X-Trans IV sensor in its lower-resolution sixth generation cameras, like the X-S30, X-M6, and X-T30 IV (perhaps the X-T30 III and X-T50 “merge” into one line, called the X-T60, with a 32mp X-Trans VI sensor). If not, I suspect that the X-Trans IV sensor will live on for a few more years, or maybe they make a minor change to it and call it 26mp X-Trans VI. It might even make sense for Fujifilm to offer three different resolution options.

It’s possible, albeit highly unlikely, that Fujifilm will stop using Sony sensors. Samsung makes pretty good camera sensors, and Fujifilm even helps with some of their technology. They used to manufacture APS-C sensors for their long-defunct NX line, including a 28mp one that was pretty well regarded at the time. I could see Fujifilm using a new sensor maker for X-Trans VI, but I would be highly surprised if that actually happens. Sony is tried-and-true, reliable, and comfortable—if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

My guess is that the next X-Pro, which might be called X-Pro4, X-Pro5, or maybe even X-Pro6, will be announced early next year, and will be the first sixth generation camera. I have no idea what will be different about it. I really hope that it has the XPan aspect ratio—it would be an absolute shame if it doesn’t. The X-Pro1 kicked off X-Trans I, the X-Pro2 launched X-Trans III (there was a significant gap in-between the two), and the X-Pro3 was the first camera with Classic Negative (and some other JPEG goodies). It’s overdue, so it makes sense to me that it will be the first X-Trans VI model.

After that, the X-H3 and X-H3s (or X Eterna) seem like logical options, followed by the X-T6, which might come in late 2026 or early 2027. I could see the X-S30 announced in May of 2027, and with it the new 32mp sensor (if such a sensor happens). Of course, this is all highly speculative. I have no inside information, these are merely guesses that should be taken with a huge amount of salt.

I do think that X-Trans VI should introduce a new Film Simulation or two. While Fujifilm is the in-camera JPEG processing leader, other companies are trying to close the gap, so Fujifilm should not be complacent. Some ideas: PRO Neg. H, that resembles Fujicolor PRO 400H film, and turns pastel with overexposure; Velvia XPRO, which mimics Fujichrome Velvia 50 that has been cross-processed; Fortia, which is simply the Pop Color Advanced Filter graduated to Film Simulation, resembling Fujichrome Fortia film; Natura, a facsimile of Fujicolor Natura 1600; Neopan, a new B&W option similar to Acros but with more contrast. I have many other ideas, but those should get Fujifilm started if they’re not sure what to do.

It shouldn’t stop with Film Simulations. Some other JPEG ideas are: Highlight and Shadow Color Toning, allowing for a split tone aesthetic (available for both color and B&W photos; something like the Monochromatic Color option, but specifically for Highlight and/or Shadow); Faded Shadow Effect (Strong, Weak, Off); Vignetting (Strong, Weak, Off); Halation Effect (Strong, Weak, Off); Light Leak Effect (On, Random, Off); Mid Tone adjustment within the Tone Curve (-2 to +4); Medium Grain size and strength; Extra Strong and Extra Large Grain Effect. Additionally, I’d like to see the Retro and Expired Film Filters from the X half make their way into Advanced Filters, and also the ability to set Grain and perhaps some other customizations within Advanced Filters. Last but certainly not least, all of the 40mp cameras should have the XPan aspect ratio. If Fujifilm introduced just half of those ideas, it would be highly celebrated.

I’d also like to see Fujifilm address the IQ options—the Recipe parameters—linked to other settings, such as AF, sound, etc., within C1-C7. I explained this problem last year, and provided Fujifilm with a potential solution that came from Fred Miranda—if you’re from Fujifilm, you may want to read that article. Also, John Peltier covered this topic in his Fujifilm X-E5 video. There’s more than one way that this could be addressed, and the X-E5 does sort-of somewhat fix it, but I think it’s important to find a solution sooner than later.

We’re nearing the end of the fifth generation of the X-series. In all likelihood, the sixth generation will come in 2026, which is right around the corner. I have no idea what changes that will bring, but it will certainly bring some. While I’m excited for the new cameras, I also want to express my opinion that camera successors come too quickly. If parts can be secured, camera makers should keep manufacturing models for many years. The refresh rate should be five-to-seven years; three years should be an exception and not a rule. Regular firmware updates can keep “old” products fresh. This also means you have to keep building the current models, and situations where a certain one is discontinued and the successor doesn’t come for a couple of years should be avoided. Discontinue the old model when the new one is six months out, and when the new one is released, it should be a substantial update, and not a minor refresh. This seems like a more realistic approach, and is more similar to how the camera industry worked for many, many decades—I hope we can get back to that. In the meantime, I’ll continue to enjoy the cameras I have, which are quite excellent photo-making machines. It’s fun to consider what the future might be, but it’s important to not lose sight of here and now, which is what actually matters.

The Totally Unexpected Camera Coming in 2025… was Completely Expected

Posted on July 9 by Ritchie Roesch

Fujirumors posted an article today entitled BREAKING: This Totally Unexpected Fujifilm Camera is Coming in 2025 – And I Know You Won’t Believe Me. I believe it and even expected it, because I’ve been saying it for over a year. If you regularly read Fuji X Weekly, you probably believe it, too, and might even have expected it yourself. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve predicted it over the last 14 months—probably a good handful. For some (including myself), this is not a surprise in the least.

In the third paragraph of my Fujifilm X-T50 review (published on May 16, 2024), I stated, “The X-T50 is not the successor to the X-T30 II, but a whole new (yet highly similar) line. Fujifilm plans to sell the X-T30 II alongside the X-T50, similarly to what they did with the X-T3 and X-T4 a few years back. This also means that there is a potential future successor to the X-T30 II, perhaps called the X-T30 III or X-T40; I don’t know that for sure, but I think it is a fair assumption. The main thing for you to know is that the X-T50 is not a replacement for any previous model, but a whole new camera.”

Just two months ago, in my article entitled My Hopes for the Fujifilm X-E5 (published on May 21st), I concluded with this: “My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall….” It looks like that guess was pretty much correct.

For those still scratching their heads, Fujirumors just leaked that the X-T30 II’s successor (which isn’t the X-T50) is coming sometime in 2025. And this is taking the Fujifilm community by surprise. Many people apparently assumed that the X-T50 was the X-T30 II’s successor, even though Fujifilm said from the get-go that it wasn’t. Fuji X Weekly might have been the only website that predicted the X-T30 III (or maybe they’ll call it X-T40, but I doubt it). I don’t have any inside information, I only took Fujifilm at their word, and followed the sequence of past releases to predict this outcome. It just made sense to me.

So what will the Fujifilm X-T30 III look like? I think it will be exactly the same as the X-T30 and X-T30 II (which was mostly just a firmware update to the X-T30), except with the X-Processor 5. In other words, it will have Nostalgic Neg. and Reala Ace, but otherwise will be pretty much identical to the X-T30 II. Some are predicting an X-T50 but with the 26mp sensor instead of 40mp, but I don’t think so, personally. There will be a price increase, because of inflation (and, in America, the tariffs). The X-T30 II was $900 in 2021, which is $1,070 today, so don’t be surprised if the X-T30 III is about $1,050-$1,100 USD for the body-only outside of America, and $1,300-$1,400 in the US due to tariffs. That’s just the new normal, I think.

The question that some will certainly ask is why does this camera need to exist. The X-M5 is the new entry-level model. The X-S20 is the hybrid PASM model underneath the X-H2/X-H2s. The X-E5 has been upgraded to a mid-tier camera. The X-T50 is also a mid-tier model. Where does the X-T30 III fit into that? I believe that it will be the lowest-tier non-PASM camera, underneath the X-T50 and X-T5. This line has been historically successful for Fujifilm. It offers a more affordable option for those who want an EVF. But… I think it will also be an indication of what’s to come very soon with the other models (aside from the X-E5 and X half): price increases (at least in America, maybe not worldwide). Other brands have already announced higher prices, and Fujifilm will be doing so soon, too, in my opinion.

Of course, I’ve been wrong about plenty of things before. For every one thing that I’ve predicted correct, I’ve predicted two or three completely incorrect. That’s the trouble with guessing the future (ask Robert Zemeckis). I cannot say with any level of certainty what the X-T30 II’s successor will be like, so my predictions should be taken with a large grain of salt. But the fact is that the X-T30 II’s successor is coming soon, and I’m not surprised by it.

News: Fujifilm X Summit in Prague + Las Vegas X Summit Experience

Posted on March 10 by Ritchie Roesch

In just 10 days—on March 20th—Fujifilm will announce a new product, purportedly a fixed-lens GFX camera, in Prague. This X Summit takes place at 11:00 AM local in the Czech Republic, which is 2:00 AM Pacific Time and 5:00 AM Eastern Time in the United States. I won’t be awake for that. By the time I brew my first cup of coffee, the camera will have been long announced, and preorders already open. If you want to get this camera right away, my recommendation is to set your alarm clock.

Since most Americans will be fast asleep when the announcement happens, Fujifilm North America is having their own party, which they’re calling an X Summit Experience, in Las Vegas at the WPPI Expo. This will be at 10:30 AM Pacific Time on the 20th. If you are in the Las Vegas area, I’m sure it will be worthwhile to stop by—just be sure to register.

Fujifilm did something similar to this with the launch of the X-T50 and GFX100S II. The X Summit for that was in Australia, which was the middle of the night for most of America. So they had an X Summit Experience on a Manhattan rooftop later in the day to celebrate the announcements. I was invited to be a part of that, and it was a ton of fun. So definitely, if you are in Vegas on the 20th, be sure to go. Unfortunately, I won’t be there for this one.

It’s possible that more than one thing will be announced at this X Summit. Four products—two cameras and two lenses—were unveiled at the Sydney X Summit in 2024; however, since nothing has leaked, I would be surprised if anything else was officially announced. But, I do suspect there could be some extras, such as a future product tease, and/or more info on the upcoming GFX Eterna cinema camera. I won’t catch it live, but will probably watch it on YouTube later in the day.

Hidden Gems: Underrated Fujifilm Cameras for SOOC Photography

Posted on March 4 by Ritchie Roesch

Fujifilm is renown in the photography world for blending modern technology with vintage styling, delivering an experience similar to classic film cameras with colors inspired by analog looks. While newer models often steal the spotlight, some older Fujifilm cameras remain hidden gems—overlooked, yet still highly capable. These cameras seem to pair especially well with my Film Simulation Recipes for straight-out-of-camera photos that don’t require editing. If you’re looking for a capable, budget-friendly camera that embraces the magic of Fujifilm’s film simulations, consider these four hidden treasures.

Fujifilm X-T1: The Classic Workhorse

Released in 2014, the Fujifilm X-T1 was a game-changer for the X-series. It introduced the rugged, SLR-style design with dedicated dials that many Fujifilm photographers love. With a 16mp X-Trans II sensor, the X-T1 may not have all the latest film simulations and JPEG options, or stats that impress compared to the latest models, but don’t let that fool you—it still produces fantastic images in 2025.

This was one of the first cameras with Classic Chrome, which is the long-time most popular film simulation for those who use Recipes. Kodachrome II, Kodachrome 64, Classic Kodak Chrome, and Kodacolor are a few of the Classic Chrome Recipes that work beautifully on the X-T1, producing a vintage film-like aesthetic straight-out-of-camera. The Fujifilm X-T1 is an excellent introduction to the Fujifilm experience without breaking the bank, and it’s easy to recommend as someone’s first interchangeable-lens model to learn photography on.

*Fujifilm X-T1 & Kodak Portra 160 Recipe*

*Fujifilm X-T1 & Ektachrome 100SW Recipe*

Fujifilm X-Pro2: The Soul of Film Photography

The Fujifilm X-Pro2 is a dream camera for photographers who love the rangefinder experience. Introduced in 2016, it was the first Fujifilm camera with the 24mp X-Trans III sensor and the first to feature Acros, one of my favorite film simulations. This camera was a notable step forward in emulating film-like results thanks to added JPEG options like faux grain. Of the three X-Pro iterations, the X-Pro2 is my personal favorite.

This camera is a fantastic choice for those who want an analog-like shooting experience. With its optical/electronic hybrid viewfinder and vintage aesthetics, it feels like using an old film camera. Recipes like Vintage Kodachrome, Kodachrome II, Kodak Gold 200, and Acros Push Process (to name a few) look great on the X-Pro2. This camera is especially great for manual vintage lenses, which makes the experience even more retro.

*Fujifilm X-Pro2 & Kodachrome II Recipe*

Fujifilm X-T20: The Compact Powerhouse

When I met Omar Gonzalez on a Manhattan rooftop last year, he seemingly wasn’t carrying a camera. So I asked him if he brought one with him, and, if so, which one? He smiled, and pulled out of his sweater pocket a Fujifilm X-T20. He then told me that the X-T20 is his everyday casual camera for just walking around with. That should speak volumes. He also mentioned that the C1-C7 Custom Setting Presets were filled with Fuji X Weekly Recipes.

With the same X-Trans III sensor as the X-Pro2 and X-T2, the Fujifilm X-T20 offers exceptional image quality in a more compact, lightweight body—ideal for street photographers, travelers, and creatives on the go. Despite its size, the X-T20 retains the essential dials that make Fujifilm cameras so enjoyable to use. Recipes like Provia Slide, Everyday Astia, Agfa Optima, and Agfa Scala produce stunning yet nostalgic images on this camera. The X-T20 is an excellent choice for photographers who want a mix of convenience, quality, and affordability.

*Fujifilm X-T20 & Fujicolor Pro 400H Recipe*

Fujifilm X30: The Forgotten Compact

The Fujifilm X30 might just be the most underrated Fujifilm camera. This fixed-lens compact camera from 2014 features a 2/3-inch 12mp X-Trans II sensor and a 28-112mm (full-frame-equivalent) f/2.0-2.8 lens that has a lot of character. It’s small size is ideal for everyday carry, yet it is quite versatile thanks to the zoom lens.

The pictures from this camera are amazing, with a ton of character—I especially love the lens flare. The photos are instant memories, and that’s the selling point of the X30, as the spec sheet is not especially impressive, and the camera seems a bit outdated in 2025. Recipes like Pro Film, Lomography Color 100, CineStill 800T, and Monochrome Red are excellent options. The X30 is an everyday-carry camera—just grab it while heading out the door on ordinary outings.

Conclusion

While the latest Fujifilm cameras have more features and film simulations, these four underrated models remain exceptional tools for photographers who appreciate the magic of film simulations and Recipes. Each one offers a unique experience: the rugged reliability of the X-T1, the rangefinder soul of the X-Pro2, the compact power of the X-T20, and the travel-friendly versatility of the X30.

When paired with the right Film Simulation Recipes, these cameras prove that you don’t need the newest gear to get great results. If you’re looking for a Fujifilm camera that delivers timeless images and an engaging shooting experience, don’t overlook these hidden gems. You might just discover your new favorite camera.

Find these Film Simulation Recipes in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

My new Fujifilm camera is…

Posted on December 17, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

My latest camera purchased arrived in the mail a few days ago: a Fujifilm GFX100S II. Along with the camera I also got a couple of lenses to go with it: Fujinon GF 80mm f/1.7 and GF 30mm f/3.5. This was, by far, the most money that I’ve ever spent on gear, and it was with some apprehensiveness that I clicked the Proceed with Purchase button. Let me explain why I bought it.

My first GFX experience was with the GFX 50S, which I was able to borrow for a couple of weeks in early 2021. It was a dream-come-true to try, but I was not convinced that it was something I wanted to own. Not only was it pretty far outside of my budget, but it was big, heavy, and slow, and didn’t provide any major advantages to my photography over the X-series. If I was given one I wouldn’t say no, but I wasn’t about to shell out many thousands of dollars for it.

The next GFX experience came earlier this year when Fujifilm invited me to a retreat in the Catskill Mountains of New York. Some photographers, including myself, were loaned preproduction Fujifilm X-T50‘s to try out, and some were loaned preproduction GFX100S II’s. While I didn’t get a chance to use one myself, I did get to see the amazing images that other photographers created with it, including Bryan Minear. I’ll never forget when Bryan and I got completely drenched on an early-morning photo outing in the rain.

A few days later Fujifilm had a rooftop launch party for the GFX100S II and X-T50 in New York City (above Foto Care), and myself and Bryan were enlisted to help. We were placed together at a touch-and-try station for the GF 500mm f/5.6 lens. I didn’t know much about the gear, so I wasn’t particularly helpful. I did get to touch-and-try very briefly, though, but not enough to form any sort of opinions of the gear. I met a number of interesting and talented people, and had an amazing time, so I’m extremely grateful and honored for the opportunity.

Most recently, when Bryan and I cohosted a photowalk in Ann Arbor last month, he let me try out his GFX100S II camera with the Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 lens attached. It was a beast, but also produced amazing images. It was that experience that pushed me over the edge to want one. Prior to this, I would have said that there’s no way I’m buying one, I can’t afford it. Instead, I began looking at what it would take to buy one. I had already began saving for the next camera purchase, so I was already partway along the path, but, you know, GFX is quite expensive.

It might seem like I just suddenly wanted one, like I was smitten with G.A.S., which is partially true. Actually, I’ve been thinking about it for some time now. Specifically, I have had an interest in creating 65:24 XPan panoramas, and the GFX cameras are especially excellent for that. I also want to explore square photographs, and GFX is quite good for that, too. My hope is to make large prints of these images, if I should capture any worthy of being printed.

Above: Me, as photographed by Bryan Minear using a Fujifilm GFX100S II & Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 with the XPan aspect ratio, in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

There’s also the benefit of figuring out which Film Simulation Recipes work best with the camera, and what modifications, if any, need to be considered. I haven’t made much headway with that just yet, but hopefully over the coming weeks I can publish some findings. I’ve had a number of requests for GFX Recipes, but, without any GFX gear, that’s tough to do. I should be able to make some big strides regarding this now that I have a GFX100S II in my hands.

I’m not a big fan of the heft, or the non-tactile controls, but the images are incredible! However, for everyday use, there’s no way that you can tell it’s GFX, and not X-series. In fact, I published a few pictures on Fuji X Weekly that were captured with the GFX100S II, and nobody noticed. You have to crop deeply and/or print very large to really appreciate it, I think. Those who truly “need” GFX are a small group, and I’m not one of them …yet, anyway. I’m making plans where I hope the GFX100S II proves to be a necessity for what I’m creating, so we’ll see if it does.

Above: Vultures circling a desert ridge; photo by Ritchie Roesch with a Fujifilm GFX100S II & Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 with the XPan aspect ratio and Kodachrome 64 Film Simulation Recipe.

I had to sell a couple of items to afford the camera (and to make room on the shelf for it). Even then, it was a stretch to pay for it. I had some trepidation when I ordered it, but I think it might eventually be worthwhile. Now I’ve just got to get it to the places I want to take it to—mostly, National Parks—in order to create the images that I imagine capturing with it.

I’ll try not to bombard you with GFX articles. I plan to keep this website primarily focused on X-series gear, and only sprinkled with with GFX content. But I can’t guarantee that. I might end up absolutely loving the camera, and speaking more about it than I initially intend. Or maybe it will mostly collect dust, as I choose smaller, lighter, more fun gear. Time will tell. But, for this first post, I will share with you some of my first pictures captured with the new camera.

*Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Reggie’s Portra*

*Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Nostalgic Film*

*Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Pacific Blues*

*Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + 1970’s Summer*

*Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Kodachrome 64*

*Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Kodak Gold 200*

*Fujifilm GFX100S II + Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 + Kodak Tri-X 400*

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100S II:
Amazon, B&H, Wex
Fujinon GF 80mm f/1.7:
Amazon, B&H, Wex

Fujifilm: Please Read — A Firmware Update Idea — Fixing C1-C7 on Newer Cameras

Posted on December 15, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

I’ve received a bunch of feedback from Fujifilm photographers over the last few years about one specific thing, and I have never had a good answer to it. But just today I received a note from Fred Miranda with an excellent idea on how Fujifim could possibly fix the issue without too much trouble.

On some X-Trans IV and all X-Trans V cameras, the Custom Settings presets (often called C1-C7) save a lot more than IQ parameters. Focus settings, self timer settings, and even sound settings (and a whole lot more) must be programmed into the Custom Settings. The problem is that if you adjust some parameter because of the situation you are photographing in, the camera will forget this setting and restore whatever is saved into C1-C7 whenever the camera is powered off or goes to sleep.

One example is the focus mode on my Fujifilm X-E4. Since Fujifilm did not include an M/C/S switch, you have to set this within C1-C7. Since I mostly use autofocus lenses, this isn’t typically a problem, but whenever I use a manual focus lens, I need to set it to “M”. Whenever I power the camera Off and then On or change to a different C1-C7 Custom Settings preset, I have to set it back to “M” again. Otherwise, I must reprogram my Custom Settings to be “M” instead of “S” or “C”, and remember to change it back the next time I use an autofocus lens.

Another example is in situations with bright highlights (such as shooting into the sun), I prefer to use DR400 with the Reggie’s Portra Recipe, instead of DR-Auto, which will only choose DR100 or DR200. If I make this change and the camera goes to sleep, when I wake it up, it will be back at DR-Auto, unless I reprogrammed the Custom Settings preset with DR400 (which I’ll have to remember to change back).

There are probably a thousand different examples that I could give, and the specific ones that might annoy you the most might be different than what annoys me, but the larger point is that this is an annoyance for a lot of people. Some learn to “deal with it” (it is what it is) or sometimes they sell their X-Trans V model and return to their older camera. I think it is something that Fujifilm should address, and it might even be an easy fix.

The Custom Settings presets used to not behave this way—in fact, it doesn’t on my X-T30, X-T4 and X100V. C1-C7 used to be just for the IQ settings, which are the Film Simulation Recipe parameters. All the other settings—focus, sound, etc., etc.—were set within the menu. I think this worked well, except that “Base” was confusing (until you realize that it simply means the settings you are currently using). There are advantages and disadvantages to both concepts, so I don’t think simply going back to the old way is the answer. But the new process has some problems, for sure.

Fujifilm’s solution is Auto Update Custom Settings. If you Enable it, when you make a change, the camera will remember that change, and automatically adjust your C1-C7. However, one issue is that if you Enable Auto Update Custom Settings, your C1-C7 will most likely drift out of whack over time, and eventually not resemble what you programmed. This probably works for some, but it isn’t a good option for everyone. I always select Disable.

The proposed solution that Fred Miranda shared with me is a simple firmware update. In the Edit/Save Custom Settings menu, when you select (for example) C1, there are two empty lines: one above Edit/Check, and one below Edit Custom Name. Perhaps at the bottom Fujifilm could add Save IQ Settings Only, with the option to Enable or Disable. It could be default disabled (and, out of the box, the cameras would work the same as they do today), and enabled only if the user wants it to be enabled (what I would choose).

If you Enable Save IQ Settings Only, then all of the other options—AF/MF, Shooting Settings, Wrench, etc.—are greyed out when you program your C1-C7, as you won’t be able to set those within C1-C7. Whatever you have programmed into the Menu when no C1-C7 is selected (a.k.a. “None Selected” or, in the Q-Menu, “A/S/M/P”), is what those settings will be. Basically, it would make your C1-C7 function like it used to, and only be IQ (Recipe) settings.

What’s cool about this is that not only would it give you the choice, but it would give you the choice for each Custom Preset. You could Enable some, and Disable others. It gives you a lot more flexibility with how C1-C7 operates (make it work best for you). This seems like a fairly simple firmware update to create, so it shouldn’t require a lot of resources to implement. An easy fix, as they say, that should make everyone happy.

Now I don’t know if it would work with the PASM models, like the X-H2s, X-H2, X-S20, X-S10, or X-M5. The concept might need to be modified or completely nixed for those cameras, I’m not sure (I don’t own any, personally). But for the X-E4, X-T30 II, X-T5, X100VI, and X-T50, it should work like a charm. The X-T5, X-T50, and X100VI might be a good starting point. And it should definitely be implemented in future cameras—there’s plenty of time to bring this to whatever is in the pipeline.

I want to thank Fred for sharing this idea with me. I hope that Fujifilm reads this, and, if they do, takes it into consideration. This would improve the experience for many on the newer models, and I think it will prove itself worthwhile in the long run.

No, Fujifilm is NOT purposefully causing camera shortages — why this is absurd

Posted on December 5, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

*Captured with a Fujifilm X-T50 using the Fujicolor PRO 160C Warm Recipe*

Back in May, Teiichi Goto, Fujifilm President and CEO, in response to a question about their inventory situation and plan, stated, “The most important point is how much brand strength to create and how to maintain it. Therefore, it would be quite unfortunate to manufacture too much and lower the price. What Fujifilm has been trying to do for a long time is finally coming true now. We intend to drive the entire imaging business, including Instax, while concentrating on building brand strength and not reducing the value of the properties purchased by our customers.” When asked if the current inventory situation is normal, Mr. Goto replied, “Yes.”

A lot of people interpreted that to mean that Fujifilm is purposefully causing market shortages. But they’re wrong, and I’m growing a bit tired of seeing this myth perpetuated over and over. I addressed it once, back in July, making a strong case that Fujifilm is not purposefully creating market shortages, but is simply getting better at “Lean” production. Unfortunately, based on what I keep seeing online, I think it needs to be said again, so here we go.

First, you have to understand that Mr. Goto spoke those words in Japanese, and they were later translated into English. Translating isn’t as easy as Google makes it seem. These two languages are very different. Fujifilm, for a number of years, translated “Daylight” White Balance as “Fine” in English. It’s as much an art as it is a science, and it is quite easy to get wrong, even subtly—small misinterpretations can cause big misunderstandings. This article that I’m typing right now might not fully translate well into Japanese, and could perhaps be misunderstood in that language. With that perspective, I think it’s important to read Mr. Goto’s words with a bit of grace and with a grain of salt.

*Captured with a Fujifilm X-T50 using the Superia Negative Recipe*

In order for someone to come to the conclusion that Mr. Goto’s intended communication was “purposefully create market shortages” one must have zero grace for translation errors, plus make a mental pretzel, because nowhere is that sentiment overtly stated, only vaguely implied. If you squint your eyes just right, it’s right there in-between the lines. Yet people go around stating it as fact. It’s not fact, it’s simply a misunderstanding.

Which brings me to the second point. You cannot understand what Fujifilm said without a basic understanding of the Lean Business Philosophy. If you don’t have that understanding, your local library or book store has an excellent selection on this topic, I’m sure. Just as a teaser, you can read this Harvard Business Review article, which gives a very brief synopsis of what the Lean strategy is. Like a lot of Japanese companies, Fujifilm operates under this philosophy, so understanding it will provide you with the context in which to best understand Mr. Goto’s words.

I have read a book or two on the topic. My interpretation of Teiichi Goto’s statement is this:
– “Brand strength” = not overproducing, which devalues the products.
– “Maintaining brand strength” = better forecasting future market trends, so as to not overproduce.
– Overproducing is bad for both Fujifilm and Fujifilm’s customers.
– Fujifilm has always strived to not overproduce products, but not very successfully; however, they’re getting better at it.
– Getting better at not overproducing is a driving force for Fujifilm.

*Captured with a Fujifilm X100VI using the Texas Sun Recipe*

Now you might think, what’s so bad about overproducing? In the Lean Business Philosophy, overproducing—and overbuying, which is related—is a sin. It’s bad. It’s better to buy one too few parts than one too many. It’s better to produce one too few products than one too many. Overproducing and overbuying means you now have warehousing issues, which cause all sorts of headaches across multiple departments. In order to deal with that, the company will often sell the products at a nice discount in order to get it out of the warehouse. This is bad for the company, because they are likely taking a loss, and it’s bad for the consumer because it reduces the resell value of the product they spent a bunch of money on. Those looking for a bargain might desire overproduction, but the discounts come at a price.

In a perfect world, every company would manufacture just the right amount of every product, so that the demand would be perfectly met, and there would never be any over or under production. But, we don’t live in a perfect world. Demand is difficult to predict, and it is being predicted months and months in advance. It takes quite some time to secure all of the parts from various suppliers, assemble those parts into cameras, and get them onto store shelves. The camera that just came in stock at your local camera store likely began six months ago or more, as Fujifilm approached the various vendors to get the necessary parts to build it, and schedule the manufacturing to get it assembled. They predicted back in the summer that you would be buying the camera in December, and built it based on that prediction. If it was possible to make the exact number of a copies of all of their products to perfectly meet the demand, I’m 100% convinced that Fujifilm would do it. But, like The Price is Right, they don’t want to do that at the expense of going over (especially way over), which is the same as losing.

Fujifilm has guessed wrong many times in the past. Some cameras that were overproduced are the X-E3, X-H1, and X-T4. Those aren’t the only ones, but those are some recent examples. Fujifilm had to sell them at a discount, which reduced their resell value for those who purchased them new. It’s a lose-lose. So they’re working hard to not repeat that. It might mean the camera you want hasn’t been sitting on the shelf at your local camera store collecting dust as it is waiting to be sold, but that’s not a bad thing when you think about it.

*Captured with a Fujifilm X-T4 ES using the Aerochrome v2 Recipe*

But what about the never-available Fujifilm X100VI? That’s an extreme case. It’s not everyday that a camera goes viral, and no camera has ever gone as viral as the X100VI. It holds the record as the most preordered camera in the history of cameras, and the most in-demand camera of 2024, and probably ever. Nobody could have anticipated that, but people think they should have, and, despite manufacturing the X100VI at four-times the rate of the X100V, people accuse Fujifilm of purposefully producing too few in order to artificially inflate demand.

Let’s say that Fujifilm decided to increase production of the X100VI to 60,000 units per month (basically, doubling current numbers). It would take them months to acquire all the parts and get assembly scheduled, meaning that Fujifilm would be predicting that the global demand for the X100VI would be at least 60,000 units per month next summer. But let’s say the market flips between now and then, and demand for the X100VI plummets to only 10,000 units per month (which, incidentally, is closer to what the demand was for the X100V). Because Fujifilm has set into motion six months of 60,000 units, they will have over-manufactured 250,000 copies before the end of next year, a shocking number! Fujifilm has the tough position of trying to keep up with shifting demands while being careful not to overproduce, and predicting all of it months in advance.

Let’s cut Fujifilm a little slack, and have a bit of grace, as they navigate changing market conditions. I don’t envy them, as I’m sure it’s not easy. If Fujifilm is getting better at the Lean strategy, I think that’s good, and not something they should be criticized for. I’m all for maintaining brand strength, because it’s good for all of us.

Your Gift Guide for Affordable Fujifilm Gear

Posted on November 29, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

It’s the holiday season, and Christmas is right around the corner. Maybe you want to give a gift to your photographer friend or family member something that they will absolutely love. Perhaps your spouse, child, grandchild, or niece/nephew is interested in following in your footsteps, and are hoping to find their first “real” camera under the tree. If you are shopping for a fellow photographer or budding photographer, I’ve got some gift ideas for you!

For my 40th birthday, my wife got me a Fujifilm X100V, which was such an incredible gift! For her 40th birthday, I gave her a Fujifilm X-T4. While those were certainly wonderful presents, they were very unusual for us, as we don’t typically spend anywhere near that much for birthdays and Christmas, and probably a lot of you reading this don’t either. There are tons of great more affordable options and it’s easy to get overwhelmed, so for this article I’m going to narrow the premise, which hopefully will provide some of you with a little better clarity.

First off, I’m assuming that you don’t have a small fortune to spend, and so you don’t mind buying used gear, which is more affordable, and perhaps a bit more practical as a gift. MPB, the sponsor of this article (where all my suggested gift ideas can be purchased from), is the largest global platform where you can buy, sell, or trade used photo and video gear—each piece checked by hand before being MPB Approved. If you’re thinking about upgrading or gifting gear this holiday season, embracing used is a great way to keep costs down without compromising on quality. Secondly, this website is Fujifilm-centric, so all of my suggestions will be related to that brand of gear.

Let’s jump right in!

Fujifilm X-T1 — Best learning camera

For someone who wants their first “real” camera to learn photography on, the Fujifilm X-T1 is my top recommendation. First, it has manual tactile controls to learn the principles of photography with (such as the exposure triangle). Second, while it is “old” for digital technology (released in 2014, a full decade ago), it is still very capable. This was Fujifilm’s flagship model when it was introduced, and 10 years later it holds up pretty well. Interestingly, in 2021, Antonio Faccilongo won the World Press Photo Story of the Year with a photograph captured with this model. Third, the X-T1 is quite affordable, and can be purchased for less than $500. You will need a lens to go with it, and my top recommendation is the Fujinon 35mm f/2, which can be had for less than $300 used. Depending on the exact copies you pick, you can get a camera and lens combo for under $800, and even under $700 if you don’t mind a few scuffs.

Fujifilm X-S10 — Affordable hybrid for videography

While many cameras are great for photography, some don’t excel at both stills and video. My top recommendation for an affordable hybrid—a camera that’s good for both stills and video—is the Fujifilm X-S10, which has in-body-image-stabilization (IBIS), an important feature for videography. If you are buying for someone who has shown an interest in creating TikTok or YouTube videos, you’ll want to strongly consider the X-S10. It can be had for under $900, which makes it the most expensive camera in this list; however, I think it pairs well with the Fujinon 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6, which is one of the more affordable lenses at about $150.

Fujifilm X-A2 – Most affordable camera

I get asked somewhat frequently what is the cheapest way to get into Fujifilm, usually from those wanting to buy a camera for their child or grandchild. Is it possible to do so under $500? Well, it is possible, but just barely. The Fujifilm X-A2 can be had for under $350, and the Fujinon 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 is about $150, which brings you in right around $500. The X-A line was Fujifilm’s most budget-friendly series. The X-A2 was released in 2015 and is approaching 10 years old; however, it is still surprisingly capable, with similar technical stats as the Fujifilm X-T1.

Fujifilm X30 — Fun for the one who has everything

For the photographer who has it all, the Fujifilm X30 is a fun little camera! There’s a pretty good chance that the photographer you are shopping for doesn’t have this model. It’s older, and doesn’t have particularly impressive stats, but what it lacks technically it more than makes up for in pure joy. Nobody is going to make a career out of this camera, but for fun snapshots that have a ton of character, the X30 is one to take a close look at. It’s not necessarily cheap at around $700, but at least you don’t have to buy a lens for it, since it is a fixed-lens camera.

Fujinon WCL-X100 II & TCL-X100 II — Conversion lenses for X100-series cameras

If the photographer you are buying for already owns a Fujifilm X100-series camera, like the X100VI, X100V, and X100F, a great addition are the two conversion lenses: WCL-X100 II and TCL-X100 II. These two lenses add versatility to any X100-series camera, and are especially great for travel photography. They’re not terribly expensive, either: the WCL-X100 II is about $200, while the TCL-X100 II is about $230. Choose one, or choose both. If it’s just one, I would give first consideration to the WCL-X100 II.

If you are searching for a holiday gift for the photographer or budding photographer in your life, I hope that this list provided you with some clarity. I always enjoy receiving camera-related clothes and coffee mugs and things like that as gifts, but if you really want to give a camera or lens, those do cost a lot of money, and I think that this list has some excellent suggestions; however, feel free to browse MPB’s current inventory, as you just never know what you might find.

Join me at Fujifilm Create With Us in Austin

Posted on September 6, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

Join me in Austin, Texas, on September 28th! I will be co-leading two photowalks with Fred Agho, one at 1:30 PM and the other at 4:30 PM, as a part of Fujifilm’s Create With Us event. If you live in Austin (or are within driving distance of Austin), this is an event that you won’t want to miss!

What is Create With Us, you ask?

Create With Us is an opportunity for passionate image makers (that’s you!) to create, learn, and network with industry professionals. Take the chance to meet fellow creators who also see the world through a lens.

Photo and video bays give you the chance to test out Fujifilm’s latest X Series and GFX System cameras and lenses. But don’t worry, all brands are welcome! If you’re a stills photographer or videographer, you’re in. 

Join like-minded individuals throughout the day, learning from top industry professionals, in workshops and immersive photowalks around the area. With so much talent under one roof, it’ll be hard not to get inspired. 

When your feet get tired, sit in on demos and short film screenings. You can also treat your camera gear to a complimentary Check and Clean service.

This will be an epic day of learning, creating, networking, and more! You must be registered to attend. Space is limited, so don’t procrastinate—sign up today! I hope to see you in Austin!

Fujifilm X30 — Fujifilm’s Forgotten Retro Compact Zoom

Posted on August 5, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

The Fujifilm X30 is an amazing and fun little camera. All it does is create wonderful pictures. It was quite surprising, and just blew away my expectations! I bet some of you aren’t even aware that this camera exists.

MPB is the sponsor of this article. They loaned me a Fujifilm X30 to try out for a couple of weeks. For those who don’t know, MPB is an online platform where you can buy, sell, or trade used photo and video gear. “At MPB, there’s something for everyone who wants to try something new, hone their skills, or pursue their passion—and it won’t cost the earth.” If you’re in the market for used camera gear, be sure to check out their platform—you can learn more about MPB here. Thank you, MPB, for making this article possible!

The Fujifilm X30 is a compact fixed-lens zoom camera with a tiny 12MP X-Trans II sensor. The third iteration in the series, the X30 was already a bit dated when it was released in 2014. With its discontinuation in 2016, Fujifilm abandoned the series altogether. The camera has a 28mm-112mm full-frame-equivalent f/2-2.8 lens, so it covers a lot of focal lengths. It has pretty good close focus capabilities and even optical image stabilization. There’s a lot to like on paper, but the 2/3″ CMOS sensor is just really small, and I think it’s hard to take a camera seriously with such a tiny sensor—especially when that tech is a decade old or more. That’s all on paper, of course, and real world use is what actually matters.

Despite the tiny sensor, the Fujifilm X30 is actually a similar size (just a tad smaller) to the Fujifilm X-E4 with the Fujinon 18mm f/2 pancake. The camera is not nearly as compact as I had expected. I had anticipated the dimensions to be more similar to the Fujifilm X70—perhaps even be pocketable—but it’s actually noticeably larger. In place of the usual Shutter Dial is a PASM Dial (which was common on Fujifilm’s lower-end models at the time); otherwise, the X30 looks and functions like many other Fujifilm X-series cameras. Because of the tiny sensor, it has significantly lower high-ISO capabilities than the APS-C models—I think it’s best to keep the camera at ISO 800 and below, but I did use ISO 1600 in some low-light situations and it was ok enough.

I programmed seven Film Simulation Recipes into the camera’s C1-C7 Custom Presets: Classic Kodak Chrome, Kodachrome 64, Pro Film, Lomography Color 100, Provia Negative, CineStill 800T, and Monochrome Red. This is a good set that covers most situations. Also, because each one uses a different White Balance type, the camera will remember the White Balance Shift for each. On the older cameras, which aren’t capable of saving a WB Shift within the C1-C7 presets, the experience is much improved if each Recipe uses a different White Balance type. I used Kodachorme 64 the most, and Classic Kodak Chrome second most—at one point or another, each of the seven came in handy.

*Fujifilm X30 – Classic Kodak Chrome Recipe*

*Fujifilm X30 – Lomography Color 100 Recipe*

The pictures from this camera are amazing! They have a ton of character—I especially love the lens flare. I think the photographs are the selling point of the X30. It doesn’t have a ton of resolution, so you probably can only print up to 11″ x 14″ and not likely any larger; however, the files are plenty large enough for web and social media use, which is how most pictures are seen nowadays. I could see myself using this as an everyday-carry. Just grab it while heading out the door on ordinary outings.

Once again, a big “thank you” to MPB for loaning me a Fujifilm X30. It definitely is “outdated” in 2024, but the images that it creates are surprisingly wonderful, which makes it worthwhile to own and use. I think this could also be an excellent option for someone just learning photography. Even though the X30 is an easy to overlook model—especially since compact zooms have largely been forsaken by the industry—the retro design of this camera and especially the nostalgic photographs that it makes are easy to love.

Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured on a Fujifilm X30:

Previously in this series:
Fujifilm X-Pro2 — The camera that got away (again)
Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm F/2 = Interchangeable-Lens Fujifilm X100VI??
Leica Q2 from the perspective of a Fujifilm photographer

Up next: Close Up with the Fujinon XF 30mm F/2.8 R LM WR Macro

BTW, in the top picture the camera is sitting on Kyle McDougall’s book An American Mile. An excellent photoessay, and great for inspiration—I highly recommend it.

Let’s talk Fujifilm AF

Posted on July 29, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

*Captured with a Fujifilm X-M1 camera & Fujinon 90mm f/2 lens*

There have been a lot of vocal complaints recently about Fujifilm’s autofocus. I cannot tell you how many times I’ve seen people online call it “garbage” or “bad” or some other negative term. Every once in awhile a person will comment on Fuji X Weekly with a similar sentiment; however, it’s vocalized a lot less here than elsewhere, it seems. This is a controversy that I’ve tried to steer clear of—people have strong opinions about this topic, and I believe that my take is not going to be well received by those with the strong opinions. But I feel someone needs to say something, so I will.

First, let’s begin with this important perspective: no camera is perfect. Each and every model, no matter the manufacturer, has advantages and disadvantages. No Sony, Canon, Nikon, Fujifilm, etc., etc., will ever be perfect, because each and every person has different wants and needs. Someone will desire a camera that’s especially compact, while someone else will want one with a large grip. The first person would likely greatly dislike a Canon EOS R1, and the second person would likely greatly dislike a Nikon Zfc; however, the first person might like the Zfc and the second person might like the R1. The first person might like a Ricoh GR III significantly more than the Zfc, and the second person might like a Fujifilm GFX100 II a little more than the R1. For the first person, the GR III might be the most perfect camera currently available, while for the second person, the GFX100 II might be. Now realize that there are 10,000 or more various takes on what is or isn’t the “best” camera, and those opinions are likely fluid and evolving.

*Fujifilm X-T30* *— Fujichrome Sensia 100*

Second, let’s not forget that photography has been around for a very long time. It didn’t begin two, five, or ten years ago. People have been capturing amazing photographs for well over 100 years. If you were to grab a Fujifilm X-T5, jump into a DeLorean, and travel back in time just 20 years, you’d blow away the photographers of that time with what would seem like to them impossible camera technology. Yet the photographs captured today are no more impressive than than they were then. Camera gear has advanced tremendously over the last two decades, but the great photographs from today are no more great than they were 30, 40, 50, etc., etc., years ago.

If you disagree with the complaints, a common rebuttal that people will make regarding this topic is that “you must only photograph things that don’t move.” Interestingly, if you Google search photos of the Olympic games from the ’60’s or ’70’s, you can find some really amazing sports images captured well before autofocus was even invented. You can do the same with wildlife photography. They did this on equipment that was far less advanced and sophisticated than what exists today. If they could do it with the gear they had, why can’t you with the gear that you have? (Hint: it’s not the gear, and never has been).

Third, Fujifilm’s autofocus should not be expected to have the same level of performance as pretty much any other camera maker. Both Canon and Nikon’s first autofocus SLRs were released in 1986. Konica made the very first autofocus camera back in the 1970’s, and Minolta made the first “good” autofocus camera in 1985 (Sony cameras trace their heritage to both Konica and Minolta). Fujifilm has been making autofocus cameras for a much shorter time; Fujifilm also has had less R&D money to spend in-general than the Canikony brands. Anyone who expects that Fujifilm’s autofocus would be at the same level as those brands (who had a big head start and more money to spend) hasn’t put much thought into this. Even so, Fujifilm isn’t all that far behind Sony and Canon, and is arguably on par with Nikon. I have a Canon EOS 5DS R, Sony A7 IV, and Nikon Zfc (and have owned other cameras from those brands in the past), and I haven’t personally noticed any difference in autofocus performance between any of those cameras in my photography.

Fujifilm’s autofocus is very good—fantastic, actually. However, Sony and Canon (and arguably Nikon) have a bit more fantastic autofocus system than Fujifilm (as you’d expect). I really don’t understand the complaints about Fujifilm’s autofocus. It is like complaining that a Corvette isn’t a Maserati, and calling the Corvette garbage because it isn’t more like a Maserati. If you want a Maserati, buy a Maserati! Otherwise, appreciate that you have a Corvette.

The fact is that autofocus is a crutch, and I don’t mean that in a bad way. A lot of tech is a crutch, which can make things easier for you—they can oftentimes be quite helpful. I almost always use crutches of some sort in my photography, and I suspect that most other people do as well. But like any crutch, you don’t need it, or, at the least, you can learn how to make it work for you. Someone told me a long time ago that either you control your camera or your camera controls you. That has to be much more true today than when it was told to me. Whatever subject that you are photographing, people have been capturing amazing pictures in that genre for longer than you’ve been alive and with gear much less advanced and “capable” than yours. If they could do it, so can you. Your gear is only a liability if you allow it be—if it is a liability to you, you have the power to not allow it (control your camera vs it controlling you). The gear has never been the issue, but it’s a lot easier to blame the gear than to look inward. It’s important to remember that whatever you are photographing, there are people in that same genre using Fujifilm gear with much success. The gear isn’t a problem for them, so why is it for you?

Which brings us to your choice. If you own a Fujifilm camera and are dissatisfied with the autofocus, you have three options: 1) figure out how to make it work for you (you absolutely have the power to do this), 2) find a different camera that has better autofocus (a more sophisticated crutch), or 3) do neither, and just complain about it and be miserable. I can’t think of any other options, so those are your choices.

The complaints about Fujifilm’s autofocus have really only been over the last couple of years. Yes, there have been discussions about it since the original X100 back in 2011; however, I’ve seen a sharp increase in the complaints over just the last couple of years, and especially over the last year. I believe what accounts for this is people coming to Fujifilm from Canikony brands (especially Canon and Sony), and being dissatisfied with the autofocus of Fujifilm compared to the cameras that they previously had (my question is: why did they leave their previous brand if it was so good??). Fujifilm’s autofocus is not quite as advanced as Sony’s or Canon’s, but that should be expected (as was already outlined), and it doesn’t mean that Fujifilm’s is garbage or bad, only that the photographer needs to rely just a bit more on their own personal skills to compensate for the slightly diminished crutch.

It is true that I’m neither a sports nor wildlife photographer—I’ve dabbled in both at times, but those are not my main photographic interests by any stretch. I do have kids, and have captured a ton of successful pictures of them, as well as many other moving subjects. I don’t personally have any issues with Fujifilm’s autofocus—not even on the older models, which have far less sophisticated autofocus capabilities than the latest fifth-generation cameras. With that said, your photographic wants and needs might be different than mine, which brings us right back to the start: no camera is perfect, and each has advantages and disadvantages. If you don’t feel that a certain one is “right” for you, you have a lot of options. If you feel like the camera is controlling you (and not the other way around), I wholeheartedly believe that you have it within you to take control of your photography.

Fujifilm X-M5???

Posted on July 17, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

According to Fujirumors, the “camera line that most of us thought axed” that Fujifilm will be reviving is the X-M series. Apparently it will be called X-M5 and will be released sometime before the end of the year—September and November are a couple of months that Fujifilm likes to use for announcements, so maybe then. Nothing else is known at this time.

For those who don’t remember, the X-M1 was a short-lived camera near the beginning of the X-series that wasn’t particularly successful. It was unusual in that it had an X-Trans I sensor paired with an X-Trans II processor. It was a predecessor to the X-A line (the X-A1 had an identical body), and positioned lower than the X-E series. While it had a rangefinder look, it was given a PASM dial and didn’t have a viewfinder.

The X-M1 was released in the summer of 2013, right after Fujifilm began rolling out X-Trans II cameras. They also announced the nearly identical X-A1 just a few months afterwards. Those who were more familiar with the X-series and cameras in-general opted for the X-E1 or (a few months later) X-E2 because the X-E1 line was better (build quality, EVF, etc.), while those who were unfamiliar opted for the X-A1 instead because it was cheaper and the advantage of the X-M1 wasn’t obvious or well communicated. The X-M series was axed about a year later, but supplies lasted for another year due to unsold inventory.

While the upcoming camera will be called X-M5, I’m not sure what might be similar or dissimilar compared to the X-M1. I have some guesses, but it’s pure speculation. I have some suggestions for Fujifilm, but it might be too late in the design process to be implemented; however, I’ll give them anyway. I think the X-M5 is actually a smart move because Fujifilm is desperately missing a budget-friendly option for those who wish to get into the X-series but don’t have a ton to spend.

If I were Fujifilm, I would design it with a rangefinder-like shape that’s not too dissimilar to the X100VI and X-E4. In other words, it should look like the X-M1 to a large degree. I think they would be smart to keep the size down as much as possible—in fact, make the X-M5 the smallest interchangeable-lens X-series camera ever produced. Personally, I would ditch the PASM dial and use a shutter knob—the X-H series wen’t from non-PASM to PASM, so no reason X-M can’t go the other route. I doubt that it will have IBIS, unless the idea is not to keep the price down—an X-M5 with IBIS will likely be at least $900-$1,000 for the body alone, an X-M5 without IBIS should be in the $700-$800 range.

I would use the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor paired with the X-Processor V (like the X-S20, which also parallels the X-M1) and the old NP-W126S battery. Because of the small body size and heat dispersion issues, the camera will likely need some performance limitations to prevent it from overheating, which will simultaneously differentiate it from more premium (a.k.a. expensive) models. It won’t likely have an EVF, but it should have a tilting screen similar (identical?) to the one on the X-T50; however, if they do choose to add IBIS, don’t be surprised if it has a flippy screen like the X-S20. I would hope that Fujifilm would give it C1-C7 custom presets, but the X-M1 didn’t, so it’s possible that the X-M5 won’t either; however, that would be a mistake if they did—perhaps just C1-C4 if they feel the need to limit it (please give it C1-C7, though).

It seems like a safe assumption that the X-M5 will sit below the (discontinued) X-E4, eventual future X-E5, and the X-T30 II as Fujifilm’s low-budget base-level camera. Since Fujifilm discontinued both the X-A and X-T000 lines a few years back, there hasn’t been a good option for those on a tight budget to get into the X-series, except to hope for a good deal in the used market. I cannot tell you how many times people have asked me for advice on purchasing an inexpensive Fujifilm camera, but there just aren’t any options for brand-new bodies (the X-T30 II being the closest, currently). With the X-M5, there might finally be an inexpensive camera to recommend.

Fujifilm X-T50 Firmware “Bug” Affecting a Limited Number of Cameras

Posted on July 11, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

***Update: Well, that was fast! Fujifilm has released firmware version 1.02 for the X-T50, which fixes the issue for those who couldn’t update to version 1.01. If you are on version 1.01, version 1.02 is identical for you, so no need to update (although there’s also no harm in doing so, either). If you are on version 1.00, updating to the latest firmware fixes some small and rare bugs that are unlikely to affect you, but possibly could.

Fujifilm just recently updated the firmware on the X-T50 to version 1.01, but there’s been a small and unusual “bug” identified, which only affects certain models. The 1.01 firmware fixes some minor and rare issues; however, the firmware update itself has one issue.

The problem is a weird one: on only certain X-T50 cameras, you cannot update the firmware. That’s the bug. On certain models, you’re “stuck” with version 1.00. That’s no big deal, because version 1.00 isn’t bad whatsoever; version 1.01 was basically only a minor-bug-fix type update. I think the issue must actually be with version 1.00 and not 1.01, but it will all get sorted out soon enough, I’m sure, so no worries.

Specifically, the cameras affected are the silver models (not the black or grey) that were sold with the new kit zoom lens (apparently not the ones sold with 15-45mm lens or body-only) that have these serial numbers: 4BA24662 to 4BA26561, 4BA30592 to 4BA30661, 4BA34838 to 4BA35137, 4BA35678 to 4BA35857, and 4BA37468 to 4BA37687. Fujifilm was quick to acknowledge and apologize for the issue, and they are working on a solution right now.

The Fujifilm X-T50 that’s sitting on my desk in front of me is black, so I’m not affected, personally. However, if I were affected, I wouldn’t worry much. Also, it’s always a good idea to wait at least a few days—if not a few weeks—to update the firmware, unless it is one that fixes a major bug. From my experience with apps, when you fix the coding for something, something else seemingly unrelated can be affected by it; that functionality (whatever it is) wasn’t thoroughly tested because there was no expectation that it would perform any differently than it had before. So waiting a few days or longer before updating is a good rule of thumb that can save you some heartache later.

Which of these cameras could Fujifilm release next??

Posted on July 9, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

Fujirumors is reporting that Fujifilm is in the process of “reviving a camera line that most of us thought axed.” According to Fujirumors, the camera could be released anytime within the next six months. It’s always exciting when new gear is on the horizon, and it’s fun to speculate what it might or might not be. But, until it is actually released, it’s hard to know anything for certain, and so all speculation should be taken with a huge grain of salt.

The idea of a camera line revival made me consider which discontinued camera series could possibly be resurrected (apparently it isn’t the GFX50R). Over the years various series have become defunct, typically (but not always) due of disappointing sales figures. There are a number of options, so let’s briefly consider each.

My biggest hope is for an X70 successor, likely called X80. The X70 was Fujifilm’s closest competitor to the Ricoh GR series. It’s more-or-less a smaller and more wide-angle and less premium (a.k.a. more affordable) X100-series camera. Supposedly the X70 was discontinued (in 2016) because Sony suddenly stopped manufacturing the 16mp sensor found inside it, and the higher megapixel X-Trans sensors were too hot for such a small body, which prevented a successor from happening; perhaps they’ve finally figured out the heat issue (X-Trans IV sensor combined with X Processor 5?). I’ve been asking for an X70 successor for several years now, and with the popularity of Ricoh GR and other compact cameras, it seems like a no-brainer. I hope this is what’s coming, but it definitely might not be.

There are a few cameras that it could theoretically possibly be, but I’d be extremely shocked if it was. An X-S2, for example, which would be a DSLR-shaped fixed-lens super-zoom small-sensor Bayer+PASM followup to the X-S1, is not likely. I’m pretty certain that an S4 Pro is not coming, as the S3 Pro was built inside a Nikon DSLR. I don’t think an X-A30, a stripped down Bayer successor to the X-A20, is on the horizon, either.

Kodak (or, really, JK Imaging using the Kodak brand name) is selling cheap point-and-shoots like hotcakes right now; while a followup to the XF1 might seem strange, maybe it would actually be genius. If this is the upcoming camera, it would be a highly unexpected move, but one that might actually pay off and even possibly return this style to the mainstream. With the popularity of digicams right now, an XF2 isn’t completely out of the realm of possibilities; however, the odds seem pretty slim that this is it.

Perhaps an X40 is the upcoming camera: a pocket-sized retro-styled zoom with an EVF. There’s definitely an interest in an X30 successor—I’ve heard from at least a handful of people who would really like to see one—but I’m not sure if there is enough global demand for it to be worthwhile for Fujifilm; however, I would buy one if they made it. There is certainly a chance, albeit a small one, that an X40 is coming soon.

Kind of in-between an XF2 and X40 could be an XQ3, a followup to the XQ2. I’m very doubtful that Fujifilm will make any more small-sensor X-Trans cameras; however, if they produced an XQ3 (or X40) with a 20mp 1″ sensor, that would be intriguing (outside of the XF2, I don’t think Fujifilm should go any smaller than a 1″ sensor).

I’d actually be quite surprised if they released any new X series cameras with a sensor smaller than APS-C. In all probability, whatever camera Fujifilm is working on is an APS-C model, and not one with a tiny sensor. There are several options that I believe are much more likely than the XF2, X40 or XQ3.

The XF10 was the low-budget Bayer+PASM version of the X70, and it was a bit of a flop. However, with the popularity of Ricoh GR cameras right now, it wouldn’t be surprising if Fujifilm is working on a (hopefully significantly improved) successor, likely called the XF20. While I would much prefer an X80, I wouldn’t be against an XF20, if that’s what it ends up being.

That’s it for the fixed-lens options! Let’s take a look at some possible interchangeable-lens cameras that the upcoming model could possibly be. Fujifilm is supposedly working on a future X-E5 that is not this unknown camera, so I won’t discuss the X-E series in this article.

The X-A line used to be a top seller for Fujifilm, especially in Asian markets. These cameras were low-budget Bayer+PASM models that were not actually manufactured by Fujifilm, but contracted out to a 3rd party for assembly. The last one was the X-A7, which didn’t sell particularly well, and the line was discontinued. It’s possible that Fujifilm will revive this series with an X-A8, and maybe even manufacture it in-house.

Similarly, the X-T000 line was a low-budget Bayer+PASM series not manufactured by Fujifilm. It was basically an X-A camera but in an SLR shape (instead of rangefinder) and with an EVF. It’s unlikely that Fujifilm would revive both the X-A and X-T000 series, but they could bring back one of the two, and if it’s the X-T000 line, the camera would likely be called X-T300.

Last—but far from least—is the X-M2. I think the upcoming camera is more likely to be an X-M1 successor than an X-A8 or X-T300. The X-M1 was basically an X-A1 with an X-Trans sensor; the X-M2 would be a low-budget X-E like camera (but cheaper, with a PASM dial, and without an EVF), utilizing the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor. Fujifilm is desperately missing an affordable base-level camera that allows those on a tight budget to get into the system, and an X-M2 could serve that role. A brown faux-leather version would be quite nice.

If Fujifilm is indeed reviving a once-defunct camera series, it could be any of these (or maybe one that I overlooked—who knows?). There’s not a lot that can be gleaned from this exercise, other than it’s likely to be a more affordable camera, which is great—there aren’t currently a lot of options right now if you don’t have much to spend. My personal preference would be for an X80 (I’d be first in line to buy it!), but the XF20 would be ok if that’s what it ends up being. I think an X-A8, X-T300, or (especially) an X-M2 are also strong possibilities. Basically, we know very little, and it could be just about anything.

Which of these cameras would you be most interested in? Let me know in the comments!

Is Fujifilm Purposefully Causing Shortages to Manipulate the Market?

Posted on July 8, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

The short answer is no. The longer answer is below.

There’s a controversy that’s been brewing for awhile, but has really gained steam over the last couple of weeks, that suggests Fujifilm is purposefully crafting market shortages of products so as to create hype (or, really, FOMO), in an attempt to ensure that their products are constantly in high demand. The roots of this controversy are in the constant shortages of Fujifilm’s products. At one time, you could walk into most camera stores on any given day and buy the camera or lens that you wanted; however, over the last few years, that hasn’t always been the case. Then, just recently, Fujifilm seemed to confirm it.

*Manhattan from Pulaski Bridge* – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – PRO Negative 160C

“The most important point is how much brand strength to create and how to maintain it,” said Teiichi Goto, Fujifilm President and CEO, in response to a question about their inventory situation and plan. “Therefore, it would be quite unfortunate to manufacture too much and lower the price. What Fujifilm has been trying to do for a long time is finally coming true now. We intend to drive the entire imaging business, including Instax, while concentrating on building brand strength and not reducing the value of the properties purchased by our customers.” When asked if the current inventory situation is normal, Mr. Goto replied, “Yes.”

A lot of people responded to this with something to the effect of: “This proves it! Fujifilm is purposefully creating camera shortages to manipulate the market.” But I think they misunderstand it. I wasn’t planning to write this article, but, since I’ve had several people ask me to comment on the controversy, I thought I’d type out my opinion.

I’m completely convinced that if Fujifilm could produce the precise number of gear (cameras, lenses, etc.) for the current demand, so that everyone who wanted to purchase something could do so without waiting, they would. But that’s nearly impossible to correctly estimate. When PetaPixel asked for clarification if they consider insufficient supply to be part of a marketing strategy, Fujifilm responded, “No. Our marketing strategy is to showcase the innovation behind our lineup of digital cameras and lenses to provide creators with a variety of options so they can choose the right tools for their craft.”

*Sign on the Roof* – Gila Bend, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Classic Color

It takes many months for a camera to be manufactured and end up at a camera store. Fujifilm has to secure the parts, get them assembled, and shipped across the world. They are guessing in December what the demand might be in July. And there are limited resources for manufacturing. How many parts can a supplier produce at any given time? How many cameras can an assembly line put together each day? The whole process is much more complex than I think many people assume. Fujifilm not only has to anticipate future demand, but they have to figure out how to meet that within the constrains of many and various limitations.

Demand isn’t steady, but constantly fluctuating. It can spike unexpectedly, and fall off a cliff unexpectedly. If the demand for a certain camera suddenly ceases, Fujifilm needs to anticipate that months and months in advance, or they’ll continue to manufacture tens of thousands of copies of a product that few are buying.

Let’s look at the Fujifilm X100V. It was released in early 2020, and, for about two-and-a-half years, Fujifilm was more-or-less manufacturing the number of copies it needed in order to meet the demand for that camera. Then, suddenly, demand spiked, due to several viral TikTok videos. Fujifilm did not ramp up production (or, if they did, it wasn’t nearly enough) of the X100V, likely because they assumed the hype would quickly dissipate, especially since the camera was approaching three-years-old at the time; however, they guessed wrong.

Sentinel & Merced – Yosemite NP, CA – Fujifilm X100V – Vintage Color

For the X100VI, Fujifilm assumed that doubling the production of the X100V would be enough to meet the anticipated demand for it. Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your perspective, the demand for the X100VI was historic and unprecedented. There were more preorders for the X100VI in China alone than there were X100V’s manufactured in total. Fujifilm has said that they will be increasing production of the X100VI, but I’m not certain to what extent exactly (I’ve heard that it could be 30,000 units per month by sometime in the summer, but I have no idea what the precise numbers are right now).

This is uncharted territory for not just Fujifilm, but for any camera maker. Fujifilm has to try to meet steep current demand while being hyper alert for any changes in future demand. If, for example, they are actually making 30K cameras per month, and suddenly the floor drops and nobody wants one, and they’ve already set in motion the manufacturing of 150K cameras, that could be enough to bankrupt the company (at least the camera division).

Another example is the Fujifilm X-E3 and X-E4 cameras. Fujifilm anticipated that demand for the X-E3 would be greater than it actually was, and made too many copies. Fujifilm had to discount the X-E3, and sometimes significantly, to clear the warehouse. You could still find brand-new (and discounted) X-E3 bodies 18 months after it had been officially discontinued. Fujifilm used the sales figures of the X-E3 to estimate the demand for the X-E4; however, the X-E4 was much more in-demand than the X-E3 was (largely because it was viewed as a top alternative to the impossible-to-find X100V in the aftermath of the viral videos). Fujifilm did not secure enough parts to manufacture nearly enough copies to meet the demand of the X-E4, and likely assumed (incorrectly) that the spike in demand would be short-lived. If you look at eBay, X-E4’s are listed for double the price of X-E3’s, and much higher than the MSRP when they were brand-new.

*Low Sun over Tetons* – Grand Teton NP, WY – Fujifilm X-E4 – Ferrania Solaris FG 400

I bring that up for a specific reason. While consumers prefer over-manufacturing (especially since it usually means one can find bargains, and you can readily buy what you want), producers prefer under-manufacturing. Most ideal is precise-manufacturing, but that is really difficult to achieve; between over and under, every company—including Fujifilm—would much prefer to err on the side of making too few of something than too much. And, if you want the gear that you spent a lot of money on to retain its value, you, too, will prefer them to err on the side of caution.

Toyota created the Toyota Production System in the aftermath of WWII. This system invented what is now referred to as Lean Manufacturing (or Lean Business Philosophy or Lean Strategy Process). Many books have been written on this topic—I have a few on my library shelf, although I’ve only actually read one. To understand Fujifilm’s approach to manufacturing and inventory means understanding the Lean approach, which is used worldwide, especially in Japan. This Harvard Business Review article gives a very brief synopsis of what the Lean strategy is, just to give you an idea; even better, I’m sure your local bookstore has a few books on this topic.

The conclusion is that Fujifilm (along with all manufacturers) is in the tough position of trying to accurately gauge demand for each product they offer, and attempt to produce just the right amount; if they are going to err on one side or the other, they much prefer to err by producing too few copies than too many. Making too many of something reduces its value, while making just the right amount or too few does not. They have to guess what the demand will be many months from now, not just what the current demand is. The current demand might be an indication of future demand, but it also might not. Fujifilm would love to make and sell 50,000 copies of something, but just because they make 50,000 copies of something doesn’t mean that they will actually sell them all. A much better position for Fujifilm is to make 30,00 copies of something, and sell them all. That’s not manipulating the market, but simply good business strategy that provides some stability in a turbulent market.

My Fujifilm X-E5 Wish List

Posted on July 6, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

The Fujifilm X-E4 is one of my absolute favorite Fujifilm cameras. There was a lot of demand for it, then, inexplicably, Fujifilm discontinued the X-E4 while there was still a fairly lengthy backorder list. According to Fujirumors, Fujifilm is working on the X-E5 right now, possibly to be released sometime in 2025. There’s a reasonable chance that Fujifilm will read this, so I thought I’d take the opportunity to express my wish-list for the camera.

The Fujifilm X-E1 was my gateway into the Fujifilm system. The camera, which was released in 2012 and was Fujifilm’s second interchangeable-lens X-series camera (only preceded by the X-Pro1), was praised for its beautiful retro rangefinder design (nicknamed “Sexy One”), but also criticized for its sluggish performance (some of which was rectified in firmware updates). The X-E1 was fairly quickly replaced by the X-E2, and a minor updated version called the X-E2s was released at the end of the X-Trans II lifecycle (beginning the pattern of X-E cameras released near the end of a sensor generation). While the X-E series has a history of somewhat slow sales, the cameras tend to be much beloved by those who own them. The X-E4 did not experience sluggish sales (in fact, Fujifilm was unable to meet the strong demand); however, it was discontinued anyway, presumably because Fujifilm did not secure enough parts to produce more.

I love the Fujifilm X-E4 because it is small and lightweight, which makes it more pleasant to carry around as an everyday camera. When traveling, there’s limited space for gear in the bag, and tough choices must be made; the X-E4 takes up less room than other bodies, so it’s more likely to be chosen over larger and heavier cameras. In fact, the X-E4 and X100V (and now X100VI) have been my go-to travel cameras since 2021. I also appreciate its clean minimalistic design of the camera.

*Pacific Poppies* – Montaña de Oro SP, CA – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe

Fujifilm could simply engrave “X-E5” on the new camera and include the X-Processor 5, but keep everything else completely identical to the X-E4, and it would sell. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. People wanted the X-E4 but simply couldn’t get it. An X-E5 that is just an X-E4 with the new processor and the new film simulations would do quite well, I’m certain of it. The less Fujifilm changes, the better.

With that said, there are some things that would make the X-E5 even better than the X-E4. I do feel the minimalistic approach was perhaps a bit too minimalistic. The five key changes that I would make if I were one of the designers are: 1) bring back the M/C/S switch, 2) add an ISO Ring around the Shutter Knob like the X100 and X-Pro series have, 3) add back the rear command dial, 4) improve the EVF resolution, and 5) add a small grip to the front like the X-E3 has.

These might be unpopular opinions, but I would use the “old” 26mp X-Trans IV sensor in combination with the X-Trans V processor (like the X-S20); IBIS is unnecessary, and should be avoided for weight and cost reasons; the camera doesn’t need to be weather-sealed. Keep the X-E5 as similar to the X-E4 as possible, just refine it a little with a handful of small improvements.

*Fujifilm X-E4 + Fujinon 27mm f/2.8 + Kodak Vision3 250D Recipe*

There’s a massive opportunity that I believe Fujifilm has largely ignored. One of the biggest advantages of APS-C over full-frame is size/weight. There are tradeoffs with anything, and APS-C seems to strike a near perfect balance of size/weight, performance, image quality, and value. While full-frame cameras have been shrinking lately, APS-C has not; instead, the APS-C advantage has been shrinking. This is easily rectified, though, and the X-E5 is one step towards that, but it needs to be kept small, light, and affordable. The other key piece that’s missing are pancake lenses.

Yes, there’s the exceptional Fujinon XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR; however, it’s not often readily available for purchase. Likely, you have to add yourself to a backorder list and wait awhile. There’s also the sort-of pancake (Japanese pancake?) Fujinon XF 18mm f/2 R, but it is old, overpriced, and in desperate need of an update. Otherwise, there aren’t many options—at least not natively; however, there are some 3rd-party pancake lenses that have recently appeared, which is good. Fujifilm needs to add a few more pancakes to the Fujinon lineup, and not be satisfied with just two.

I think a total of five pancake lenses would do the trick. The 27mm f/2.8 already exists, but simply needs to be made available. The 18mm f/2 also already exists, although I would strongly encourage Fujifilm to update it. The three lenses that, in my opinion, Fujifilm should add to the pancake lens lineup are 15mm f/3.5, 23mm f/2.8, and 40mm f/2.8. That gives a good variety, and all five would together make for a fantastic kit.

*Fujifilm X-E4 + Fujinon 18mm f/2 + Fujicolor Superia 800 Recipe*

Since Fujifilm already has two 23mm lenses—the 23mm f/2 and 23mm f/1.4—they might consider something else that they don’t have, perhaps 20mm or 25mm, but definitely something in-between 18mm and 27mm. Instead of 40mm, a longer focal-length could alternatively be chosen, such as 45mm f/3.5 or 55mm f/4. The point is to have something wider than 18mm, something more telephoto than 27mm, and an option in-between the 18mm and 27mm.

A small and lightweight camera—such as the X-E5—combined with a handful of small lenses would make an ideal kit for travel and walk-around photography. It would clearly illustrate a significant advantage of APS-C over full-frame—imagine a camera and five-lens kit that could all fit into a small camera bag! I have no doubt that it would be successful, but it would require that Fujifilm clearly articulate why a small camera with small lenses should be desirable.

I don’t know if the “right” people at Fujifilm will read this, or, if they do, if they’ll listen. But, just in case, I wanted to make sure to get my opinions out there. Now it’s your turn! What would you like to see in a Fujifilm X-E5? What pancake lenses do you think that Fujifilm should make? Let me know in the comments!

The Camera that Fujifilm Should Make Right Now (but probably won’t)

Posted on June 5, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

There’s a digital camera that Fujifilm should absolutely be making right now, and it’s not the X-Pro4, or X-E5, or a full-frame model (although those would be great, too). There’s a specific camera that would fly off the shelves—the X100VI’s historic demand would pale in comparison. What is this camera?

The digital QuickSnap.

The Fujifilm QuickSnap is a disposable 35mm film camera that is beloved for its nostalgic lo-fidelity aesthetic, simplicity, and price. Fujifilm introduced the QuickSnap camera in 1986, with the slogan, “Everybody should enjoy photography with ease.” The QuickSnap was an immediate success, and was immensely popular for a very long time—it was even successful enough to survive the film crash of the 2000’s. People still buy and use QuickSnap cameras; they’re particularly popular for weddings, kids, and lomographers. Many people love the nostalgic experience of one-time-use cameras.

Interestingly, the most sold digital camera right now in Japan is a cheap Kodak digicam. Third and fifth places are also cheap Kodak digicams. Digicams are a dime a dozen (perhaps literally, if you win a collection on an auction site, or rummage through your parents or grandparents house). What’s missing in the photo world is a digital version of the QuickSnap, a film camera that partially inspired the digicam. I have zero doubts that it would be a massive success for Fujifilm, and would probably leave all digicams in the dust.

This is how I envision the digital QuickSnap:

First, it would need a digital sensor that obviously won’t be anywhere close to full-frame, since that would be both ridiculous and expensive. The Fujifilm Mini Evo has a tiny 5mp sensor; it would likely be a mistake to use that one, but they certainly could. I think that a 12mp or 16mp 1/2.3″ would be the most obvious choice, since those can be obtained by Fujifilm rather easily and cheaply. The sensor itself doesn’t matter all that much; however, cost and quality must be balanced extremely carefully. Too poor of image quality will hurt sales, while a too expensive price-tag will also hurt sales.

More important, though, is the picture aesthetic. Fujifilm should program it with their Classic Negative film simulation, including faux grain—something similar to my Fujicolor Superia 800 Recipe. The pictures created by the digital QuickSnap camera should look similar to the pictures that come out of an analog QuickSnap. As much as practical, the pictures need to look alike from the film and digital versions.

Next, it needs to function nearly the same as the analog QuickSnap. It should be super simple: a switch to activate the built-in flash, a wheel to cock the shutter and “advance” to the next frame, a shutter release button, a battery-level indicator, and maybe a one-press picture-transfer to an app. There should not be any LCD or electronic viewfinder to review the pictures.

The very basic optical viewfinder from the film camera should be carried over—the user experience should be as similar to the analog version as possible. Due to the crop factor of the sensor, a new lens will be necessary. The exact sensor size will determine what the lens should be, perhaps something like a 5mm or 6mm f/5.6 plastic lens that’s close to 30mm full-frame equivalent. What is important is that it is focus-free (fixed focus) and produces a similar aesthetic to the film camera.

A critical factor of one-time-use cameras is the film itself; namely, the tolerance for under and over exposure. Since the sensor won’t have this same tolerance, it’s necessary for the digital QuickSnap to have some amount of exposure control. It must have a light meter, as well as some (auto) control over the ISO and shutter speed. For the sake of image quality, the ISO should be capped as low as practical. If Fujifilm could utilize the D-Range Priority technology, I think that would help, too.

The digital QuickSnap should have internal storage that saves only 27 JPEG images. It could count the exposures mechanically exactly like the film camera does, providing an identical experience. Once the 27th picture has been captured, it won’t let you capture anymore until the memory has been cleared, either by wirelessly transferring the images to a mobile app, or via USB. The QuickSnap App should be super simple (and actually work), with an option within the app to auto-connect and transfer once 27 pictures have been recorded, or manually connect and transfer if preferable. The camera should also be able to connect to the Instax app, and transfer (and print) directly from there. The camera should charge via USB, and could also transfer the images using a USB cable. Once the pictures have been removed from the camera, it would then allow the user to capture the next 27 frames.

The QuickSnap App, aside from photo transfers, should have a few simple options, for those who wish to do a little more with their pictures. A retro-styled date stamp. Maybe a few filter overlays that don’t radically change the picture aesthetic (examples: high contrast, low contrast, warm, cool, color boost, reduce color, etc.), and maybe a handful of light-leak affects. The more simple the better. Maybe Fujifilm can even offer a service where 4″ x 6″ prints can be made and mailed out to customers who wish for an even more authentic experience.

While the size and design should still closely resemble the film version, I think the digital QuickSnap must feel a little more sturdy, and not so cheap that it would easily break if dropped. If Fujifilm could offer it for less than $100, that would be most ideal. A camera like that would be a huge hit, thanks to its nostalgic charm, ease of use, straight-out-of-camera aesthetic, and affordability.

You’re welcome, Fujifilm.

Don’t want to wait for a digital QuickSnap, but still want the look? Check out these articles:
Getting a Disposable Camera Look with DispoLens
Getting that ’90’s Film Look with Fujifilm Cameras

For those wondering, the four pictures in this article were captured with a Fujifilm X100VI using the Superia Negative Recipe.

Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm F/2 = Interchangeable-Lens Fujifilm X100VI??

Posted on June 4, 2024 by Ritchie Roesch

*Fujifilm X100VI (left) & Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 (right)*

I’ve seen a number of reviewers state that the new Fujifilm X-T50 is essentially an X100VI, but with interchangeable lenses—especially when combined with the Fujinon XF 23mm F/2 R WR. But is that really true? Is this camera and lens actually a good alternative to the Fujifilm X100VI? Let’s talk about it, and find out.

MPB is the sponsor of this article. They loaned me a Fujinon XF 23mm F/2 R WR to try out for a few weeks; however, they had no idea that I’d be using it with a Fujifilm X-T50. For those who don’t know, MPB is an online platform where you can buy, sell, or trade used photo and video gear. “At MPB, there’s something for everyone who wants to try something new, hone their skills, or pursue their passion—and it won’t cost the earth.” If you’re in the market for used camera gear, be sure to check out their platform—you can learn more about MPB here. Thank you, MPB, for making this article possible!

The premise is simple: the Fujifilm X-T50 and Fujifilm X100VI share a heck-of-a-lot of technical specs, they’re similarly sized, and, when you use the Fujinon 23mm f/2 lens on the X-T50, they have seemingly identical glass. The comparison is natural. But, if we dig deeper, it’s easy to spot some differences, too. In other words, there’s enough in common to consider them quite similar, but enough divergent that they shouldn’t be thought of as alike.

First, the similarities. Both Fujifilm cameras share the same 40mp X-Trans V sensor and processor. They both have IBIS. They use the same (old) NP-W126S batteries. They have the same film simulations. Video specs are identical. The tilting rear LCD is similar. On paper, the lenses are seemingly identical when the Fujinon 23mm f/2 is paired with the X-T50. At first glance you might think that the X-T50 is indeed an interchangeable-lens X100VI.

But there are some significant differences. Most obviously, the X100VI is rangefinder-styled, while the X-T50 is SLR-styled. The X100VI has a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, while the X-T50 has an EVF (not optical), and with a little less resolution. The X100VI has a (nearly) silent leaf shutter and built-in ND filter. The X100VI is weather-sealed (as long as you attach a filter to the lens), while the X-T50 isn’t (note: the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR lens is, in fact, weather-resistant). The X100VI has an ISO ring around the shutter knob; the X-T50 has a Film Dial. The X-T50 with the Fujinon 23mm f/2 is slightly larger than the X100VI. The X100VI is roughly $165 cheaper than the X-T50 with the Fujinon 23mm f/2 when you buy the lens used.

While the lens permanently attached to the X100VI is seemingly identical to the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR, they are actually not the same. Quite similar? Yes. Identical? No. They each have their own character. Things like lens flare, sunstars, micro-contrast, and bokeh are slightly divergent. I cannot say which is better, especially since that is subjective; personally, I like both lenses. If I didn’t own an X100VI, the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR is one that I would definitely have. Even though the characteristic of the two lenses are different, I feel like owning both is perhaps a bit redundant, unless you just really love the 35mm full-frame-equivalent focal length.

*Dumbo Crowd* – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – Reala Ace Recipe

The Fujifilm X-T50 with the 23mm lens offers a similar yet divergent experience than the X100VI, but are they “close enough” for most people? Probably, especially if you cannot find an X100VI because the demand is so high currently. Overall, the X100VI is a more premium camera, and there’s a reason why it’s historically desirable. For the Fujifilm faithful, the X-T50 combined with the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR lens is not likely a sufficient-enough substitute for the X100VI; however, for the casual buyer, it probably is, and it might even make more sense, since you can interchange the lenses.

For those on a budget, you may want to consider the Fujifilm X-T30 II, which is similar to the X-T50 (however, without IBIS, fewer megapixels, and two less film simulations), but is less expensive. The Fujifilm X-T30 II combined with a used Fujinon 23mm f/2 lens will run you roughly $350 less than an X100VI, making it an excellent bargain. Yes, the X-T50 is the “better” camera, but the X-T30 II is nearly as good for significantly less money. The X-T30 II combined with the 23mm lens is more similar to the X100V than the X100VI, but most of the comparisons still apply.

*Manhattan from Pulaski Bridge* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – PRO Negative 160C Recipe

I had a lot of fun photographing with the Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR lens attached to a Fujifilm X-T50. It’s fantastic, a very useful focal length, and a compact size. Because I own a Fujifilm X100VI, I don’t anticipate buying the lens; however, if I didn’t have an X100-series camera, the 23mm f/2 would be essential to have in my kit. Thank you, MPB, for letting me use one for awhile!

Example pictures, captured with a Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR lens on a recent trip to New York City:

*Urban Dog* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – Reala Ace Recipe

*Crochet Wall* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – Reala Ace Recipe

*Ice Cream* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – Nostalgic Film Recipe

*Forklift* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – Kodachrome 64 Recipe

*Urban Reflection* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe

*Food* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – Reala Ace Recipe

*Headlights & Hotel Cab* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – PRO Negative 160C Recipe

*Skyline from Newton Creek* – Fujifilm X-T50 + Fujinon 23mm f/2 – PRO Negative 160C Recipe

Example pictures, captured with a Fujifilm X100VI on a recent trip to New York City:

*Holland Tunnel* – Fujifilm X100VI – Vintage Vibes Recipe

*Bowl & Burger* – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI – Vintage Vibes Recipe

*Yellow Cab* – Fujifilm X100VI – Vintage Vibes Recipe

*Psychic Bike* – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipe

*Red* – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipe

Up next in this series: Leica Q2 from the perspective of a Fujifilm fanatic

Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 300 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

Some Current Camera Deals for Christmas

Posted on December 15, 2023 by Ritchie Roesch

With Christmas just 10 days away, you might be looking for some last-minute camera deals as a gift to yourself or a photographer (or budding photographer) in your family. This website is all about Fujifilm, and for the most part there haven’t been a lot of Fujifilm deals. There hasn’t been a lot for me to recommend to you. You can always pay full price for gear, but you don’t need me to point that out—the service that I’d rather offer is showing where you can save some money. So let’s get into that.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm GFX100S — $1,600 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujifilm X-H2s with MKX 18-55mm — $1,200 off — B&H

Fujifilm X-H2s with MKX 50-135mm — $1,200 off — B&H

Fujifilm GFX50S II — $1,000 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujifilm X-H2s with 150-600mm — $600 off — Amazon

GF 110mm — $550 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 200mm — $500 off — Amazon — B&H

GF 32-64mm — $450 off — Amazon — B&H

GF 45-100mm — $450 off — Amazon — B&H

GF 80mm — $450 off — Amazon — B&H

GF 100-200mm — $400 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 150-600mm — $400 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 100-400mm — $400 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 50mm — $300 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 8-16mm — $200 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 18-120mm — $200 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujifilm X-H2s — $200 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujifilm X-H2 — $150 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 50-140mm — $150 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujifilm X-S10 — $100 off — Amazon — B&H — Moment

Fujinon 16-55mm — $100 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 16mm — $100 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 56mm — $100 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 80mm — $100 off — Amazon — B&H

Fujinon 90mm — $100 off — Amazon — B&H

It’s a really good time to get into GFX if you’ve been thinking about it, as that’s where the best discounts are. The 50mm f/1 lens is $300 off, and that’s the most intriguing bargain to me, personally. The 90mm f/2 is one of my favorite lenses; while the discount is only $100, it is on sale, and it’s an easy one for me to recommend. If you’ve thought about doing some serious cinematography with Fujifilm, the X-H2s bundled with the cinema lenses are significantly discounted. Otherwise, the deals are pretty pedestrian right now.