Fujifilm recently released the GFX100RF; while the press has been largely positive, there have been a lot of criticisms in the comments section of articles and in forums. The complaints mostly revolve around two things: the lack of IBIS, and a maximum aperture of only f/4. What should Fujifilm do about this?
It’s important to understand that the Fujifilm GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo ever made. It’s the most affordable (aside from used) and portable option for digital medium-format photography. That was Fujifilm’s goal for this model, and they achieved it quite fantastically. With that in mind, all of the positive press is easily understood. So what accounts for all the negative comments? I believe there are a few possible explanations.
First, the GFX system is niche, and is not for everyone. Most photographers don’t need it, but some do, and some who don’t “need” it enjoy GFX anyway; however, it’s not mainstream, and likely never will be. Because the initial expectations were that the GFX100RF was a medium-format X100VI, people thought this was going to be a camera for the masses. It’s not. It’s a niche camera in a niche system. While it might offer the best way to dip your toes into GFX before deciding whether or not to take the plunge, it is not a camera that most will appreciate. It will never sell nearly as many copies as the X100VI (although it could become the best-selling GFX model). Perhaps the comparisons to the X-series camera created some unrealistic expectations. Even though there are some similarities to the X100VI and even the X70, this camera is definitely divergent from both, and those comparisons should be taken with a grain of salt. If the new camera was literally a medium-format X100VI, it would be a lot different, including bulkier and more expensive. Some might want that, but this camera is not a medium-format X100-series model. It should be appreciated for what it is (smallest, lightest, cheapest), and not criticized for not being what it was never intended to be (a medium-format X100VI).
Second, I think most of the complaints are from those who have little or no experience with medium-format cameras, and have unrealistic understandings of the norms and physics of the format. Literally, there are some who have said they’d never buy the camera unless it had an f/1.7 lens. Yeah, Fujifilm could do that, but it would be so large, heavy, and expensive, I doubt anyone would buy. My guess is that the majority of those criticizing the camera were never going to buy it, but were always going to find an excuse to pass. Interestingly, the closest medium-format camera-lens combo in size and weight is the Hasselblad 907X (plus CFV 100C back) with the 28mm f/4 lens—which also lacks IBIS, has an f/4 maximum aperture, and costs nearly twice as much as the GFX100RF.
Which brings me to third: trolls. The internet is full of them, and the Fujifilm community is no exception. In fact, I’d say that the number of trolls lurking around Fujifilm content has dramatically increased over the last couple of years. It doesn’t help that one troll can have many accounts, and use a variety of personas. You might see a whole thread conversion, and not realize that it’s just one person talking to themselves using multiple names. It makes them appear to hold a popular opinion, but in reality most disagree. If you are an internet troll, you quite literally need professional help, and I urge you to seek out the mental health help you obviously desperately need. Interestingly, when you meet photographers in-person, you realize that trolls don’t exist in real life, they’re only on the internet. I met hundreds and hundreds of photographers over the last year, and can attest that none of them are trolls. But go to the comments section of most photography sites (thankfully, not this one), and probably anywhere from a quarter to a half of the comments are from trolls. I’d encourage content creators to crack down on internet trolls—if you don’t put up with them, they tend to go away, which makes the experience better for the real people who want to enjoy your website.
Now, this is what I propose to Fujifilm: make an actual medium-format X100VI. Call it the GFX100RF-XL. Give it a 45mm f/2 lens, or, if that’s just an impossible maximum aperture (which it probably is), go with f/2.8. Give it IBIS and an optical viewfinder (maybe like what’s in the X-Pro2). Yes, the body might need to be 25% or even 50% bigger. The lens would likely be 150% or 200% larger, maybe more. It might weigh twice as much as the GFX100RF. It’ll probably cost three thousand dollars more. But there are a lot of people who claim to want this, so give it to them. Let them have the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. If it’s a big success, then they’ll have proven their criticisms both valid and valuable. Win-win. If the camera struggles to sell well, then Fujifilm knows to ignore those people in the future (so you better pony up if Fujifilm does this!).
I do think it’s worth exploring if the demand is actually real—I believe that some of it is real. There are people who would be all over a medium-format X100VI, despite the size, weight, and cost increase. It would be a dream-come-true for them. Why not find out just how many there are? If money was no object to me, I’d happily own both a GFX100RF and a GFX100RF-XL. At the very least, this camera would grab headlines, and bring attention to the brand. Most likely it won’t sell as many copies as the GFX100RF, but it would likely sell well enough to justify its existence, and become a legendary model in time, if not right away.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Photographing Phoenix – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Nostalgic Film
This last weekend, Nuzira, an up-and-coming camera store in Scottsdale, Arizona, that’s Fujifilm-centric, hosted two awesome events. First, on Friday, I co-lead a photowalk in downtown Arizona with Christopher Berry, Ryan Faer, Darin Watkins, and Lucas White (of Nuzira). Then, on Saturday, Christopher held a portrait lighting class at the camera store. Both were so great! Thank you, Nuzira, for making these happen, and I’m honored to have been a part of it.
The photowalk was awesome! I didn’t count, but my estimated guess is that about 35 people came out, give or take a few. It was a great group, with a lot of interesting conversations. Because of the First Friday Art Walk, it was very busy downtown, and unfortunately—due to the crowds—the group got separated at times; however, I think everyone had a good time, and I’d certainly call it a success. These type of community building events are so important, where face-to-face conversations can be had and friendships can be formed, so I hope to see more of these in the future.
My 11-year-old son, Joshua, came along. This was his first photowalk, and he seemed to enjoy the experience. I let him use my Fujifilm X70. I brought a Fujifilm X100VI, and used a TCL-X100 teleconverter lens for most of the pictures. While I like the 23mm (35mm-equivalent) focal length, I prefer the 50mm-equivalent focal-length just a little more. I want to give a special thanks to everyone who came out—it’s because of you that these events happen.
On Saturday morning, Christopher Berry taught a portrait lighting class at the Nuzira store. He’s a talented photographer from Tucson who is insanely skilled at studio lighting. More than 25 years ago I learned studio lighting in college, but that was ages ago, and I don’t remember much—needless to say, I was very rusty. This refresher was long overdue for me, and I’m so glad that Nuzira brought Chris up to teach it. This is something that I’d pay money for, but it was completely free!
The class was great because everyone got some one-on-one hands-on opportunities. It wasn’t just teaching theories, but putting it to practice. While I don’t have much of an interest in portrait photography personally, I was able to gain a deeper understanding of lighting, which is kind of a critical aspect of photography. Thanks, Chris, for all the great information and advice! I learned a lot.
Besides that, I got to see the new Fujifilm GFX100RF and Instax Wide Evo in-person. And there were donuts, too. It was well worth the drive across town. If Nuzira does something like this again, I certainly hope that I can make it, or be a part of it in some way.
Above: Fujifilm GFX100S II & Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 – Film Dial Recipes (the portraits were with the Reala Ace film simulation)
I’d really like to see more photography events happen—not just in Phoenix, but across the country. We can all learn from each other, and in-person connections are, unfortunately, lacking in our modern society. Camera stores, clubs, and manufacturers can help to facilitate events. This shouldn’t be a one-time thing—it would be great to see more photowalks and classes pop up all over the place. I hope they do. And if there is one in your area, definitely make an effort to attend.
On the fourth day of this trip, which was the third full day in Charleston, we spent the entire afternoon and evening at Magnolia Plantation and Gardens. This spot was picked by my wife, Amanda, and I really didn’t know what to expect. Learning my lesson from the prior day, I brought along my Fujifilm X-E4 with the 27mm pancake lens attached, as well as my Fujifilm X-T4 ES infrared camera with the 35mm f/2 lens. The X-T4 ES is currently my favorite model, but it does require the right subjects and light to really do well. Although spring was just beginning to appear, there were still a lot of dormant trees, and a lot of them looked like winter or even late-fall, so I wasn’t sure how well the infrared camera would do.
I was blown away by the beauty of this location—it’s a nature and wildlife photographer’s playground! It seemed like a place you can return to over and over again, and not exhaust the picture opportunities. I can also understand why it is one of the top choices in the area for weddings. From a photographer’s point-of-view, this is a must-see location in Charleston.
The Fujifilm X-E4 with the 27mm pancake lens was perfect. It never got in the way—I kept it in my sweater pocket—and it delivered excellent results. This camera-lens combination is not talked about enough, perhaps because both items have been difficult to find. In my opinion, Fujifilm should prioritize a successor to the discontinued camera, and consider producing another pancake lens or two to go with it. The X-T4 ES was hit-or-miss. I think if we had been there a few weeks later, it would have done better; however, I still got some good photos.
Magnolia Plantation and Gardens is pretty much all we did on this day, but it was definitely a highlight of the trip. If you ever visit Charleston, make sure that this place is on your agenda. This spot alone made the trip from Arizona worthwhile, and I hope to return someday.
Train, Truck & Cart – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
This is a one-year photo-a-day project called 52 Weeks of Photography. Even though it is a year-long undertaking, I’m taking it one week at a time, because it’s a little easier to manage many small blocks than one large chunk. This is the 14th week, so the 14th set of seven images.
The reason why I’m doing this 365 Day project is because I noticed some gaps in-between my images last year. I didn’t pick up my cameras daily. On several occasions, four or five days passed by without a single picture created. Twice in 2024, I skipped a whole week. I want to rectify this, and get back into the habit of daily photography. I also want to elevate the quality of my craft in 2025, and am hoping that this will help.
On The Go – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 & 27mm f/2.8 – Kodak Tri-X 400
The plan is to capture a year’s worth of notable images, either personally or artistically. Ansel Adams famously stated, “Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.” It’s important to keep expectations realistic, but I’m also trying to avoid thoughtless snapshots just to fulfill the day’s requirement. I want to push myself to be better, and hopefully that will happen. Not every photo will be great—in fact, most won’t—but I hope they are all at least decent enough to be shared without embarrassment. And maybe when the whole project is complete, there will be 12 significant pictures (out of the 365) that I’m particularly proud of.
While the previous week was easy for this project, this week was difficult. It started out with some serious jet-lag. Then some of us got sick. Then my family participated in a 72 hour film challenge. All four of my kids are in a creative arts club, which hosts an annual film challenge. The kids form teams, which could be with their peers (which is what my two oldest did last year) or with their family (what they decided on this year… although the two girls were also on another team). So we had 72 hours to write, record, edit, and submit a five minute short film. Then we had an additional 24 hours to make a trailer and poster. All of the films will play in a local movie theater later this month, and sometime after that I’ll share our video in a post, for anyone who might be interested. Making this short film was in addition to all the “normal” things that go on day-to-day, so finding time for photography was difficult on a few of the days.
Without further ado, below are the 14th set of seven pictures from this 52 Weeks of Photography project.
Makoto told PetaPixel, “[O]ur first priority was how to make it smaller and lighter weight.” That’s pretty much the entirety of the article, as the rest is simply explaining why the camera does not have IBIS or a larger maximum aperture than f/4 and other design choices. It’s worth reading, if you are curious about those things. The main point: Fujifilm set out to make it as small and lightweight as possible. Interestingly, they did create mockups of versions with IBIS and larger apertures, but it required the camera to be significantly larger and heavier, which went against their “first priority” of small size and less weight. IBIS alone, according to this interview, would have doubled the camera’s size, because the lens would have to project to a much larger area.
The lens is pretty remarkable in that it is extremely compact for medium-format, and it barely covers the sensor. That’s why IBIS wasn’t practical, as it would have required a different and much larger lens. That’s why the maximum aperture is “only” f/4, as a larger aperture would not only have required a larger lens, but it would likely begin to show vignetting and corner softness when wide open. All of the design choices make sense when viewed through the prism of Fujifilm’s top priority: size and weight. The engineers succeeded, and did so quite fantastically.
Now you might disagree with the “first priority” that Fujifilm gave the GFX100RF team. You might not appreciate that the GFX100RF is the smallest, lightest, and cheapest digital medium-format camera-lens combo that has ever been made. You might have wished that Fujifilm’s top goal was to make this as premium of a camera as possible, or balanced somewhere in-between premium and size/weight/cost. I think that’s where a lot of the criticisms are found. There are some (quite) vocal critics who disagree with the design ethos, and wished that this camera was different.
This is where the second PetaPixel article comes in. Interestingly, interchangeable-lens camera sales are declining year-over-year, while fixed-lens camera sales are increasing because of a renewed interest in compact cameras. Who is leading the fixed-lens camera market? Kodak. Surprised? It’s JK Imaging selling cheap point-and-shoots on Amazon under the Kodak PixPro name—cameras that are basically 15-year-old tech digicams. Second is Fujifilm, thanks to the massive success of the X100VI, which has already outsold all of the previous X100-series models, and also the Instax Evo line. Canon is third—largely because of their nine-year-old (but still in production) ELPH 360 digicam—but declining (the PowerShot V1 will certainly change that trajectory to some degree). Kenko Tokina is fourth with their tiny toy cameras and digicams. Panasonic is fifth and on the rise, due to the sales success of the DC-ZS99. Ricoh is sixth, thanks to the GR III and GR IIIx, and would probably rank higher if they manufactured those cameras at a higher rate to meet the current demand. Most of the fixed-lens cameras that are selling like hotcakes right now are cheap point-and-shoots; the exceptions are the Fujifilm X100VI and Ricoh GR III/GR IIIx.
If you are trying to understand why Fujifilm chose to make size, weight, and cost the priority for the GFX100RF, that’s why. Simply, it’s market trends. By making the camera as small, lightweight, and affordable as possible, Fujifilm gave it the best chance for market success. The early indicators seem to show that it was the best choice, but only time will tell. That’s not going to make those who wish that Fujifilm had made other aspects—like stabilization and maximum aperture—more important feel any better, but I hope it sheds some light on the why, even if you disagree.
With the massive success of the X100VI, if sales figures for the GFX100RF are good, and if Fujifilm were to release some other fixed-lens option (say, the half-frame camera that’s been rumored), it’s quite possible that Fujifilm will find itself at the very top of the fixed-lens market, which is a growing segment. But, I think it’s also quite possible that, as the months pass by, more and more fixed-lens cameras will be released by other manufacturers, heating up the competition, and making it more difficult to stay on top. Getting quality (and exciting) products out ahead of competitors is going to be a big long-term win for Fujifilm in my opinion; however, predicting the future is impossible, and I’ve certainly been wrong plenty of times before, so who knows? It does seem like smart moves to me, though. Overall, the GFX100RF is likely only going to be a small contributor to Fujifilm’s fixed-lens sales numbers (it’s a $4,900 camera, after all, and GFX models don’t move nearly as quickly as X-series), but it will probably do well for the company’s bottom line, which is good if you’d like to see them continue to make interesting cameras well into the future.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
For the third day of this trip, which was the second full day in Charleston, we planned to explore downtown. So after breakfast, we drove towards the City Market, which was on our to-see list. We didn’t have a detailed plan, and decided to just kind of figure it out once there.
I wasn’t fully sure what to expect photographically, and thought there might be some panoramic opportunities, so I decided to bring my Fujifilm GFX100S II with the Fujinon 30mm f/3.5 lens. Big mistake—and by that I mean the camera is much too bulky and heavy to carry around all day. It’s not a good option for walk-around photography. It captures lovely photos, but I won’t be choosing it for situations like this again, where I’ll have it around my neck for hours and hours. I definitely regretted the camera choice for this day. Still, I came away with a handful of good photos, so it wasn’t for nothing.
When we arrived, we saw all these horse-drawn carriages, and thought it looked fun. There are a lot of different options, and we chose Palmetto Carriage Works. I’m not sure which one is best, but we had a great time on ours. It was an excellent way to see the city and learn some history, much of which we would have missed if we had not done this. Besides that, my two daughters love horses, so they were especially happy about it.
After the carriage ride, we walked around a little, then found some lunch (which was a late lunch… we were still on Arizona time). After that, we finally made it to the historic City Market, which was cool. There were a couple photographers selling prints, and many other artists. We explored downtown a little more, before heading to Rainbow Row (colorfully painted historic homes from the late 1700’s) and The Battery (historic promenade along the Charleston Harbor).
I was disappointed to learn that morning golden hour is better for Rainbow Row than evening golden hour, since the buildings are backlit in the afternoon. Still, I did find some little slices of interesting light, so it was nonetheless worthwhile. We were going to spend sunset at The Battery, but the no-see-ums were out in full force, so we didn’t stick around for very long. The bugs weren’t a problem in the city, but by the water it was definitely an issue.
After spending most of the day in downtown Charleston, we decided it was time to head back to the AirBnB. We took the long way back through Mount Pleasant, and I found a Fujifilm sign in the window of a frame shop (turns out they develop film). We ended Day 3 with waffles for dinner. By this time I had exchanged the GFX for my Fujifilm X-E4 with the 27mm pancake lens, which was a relief; however, the photographic day was pretty much over by then. Oh, well. Lesson learned.
Day, Light – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Fujicolor Film
Horses & Carriages – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Nostalgic Film
Storage Sunset – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – The Rockwell – Day 1
My kids had their spring break last week, and Amanda and I had decided to travel somewhere with the family while they were off from school. Although we had wanted to do a trip, we hadn’t made a decision regarding where we were going to go until a few weeks ago. The destination was a last minute decision. We had a few different places in mind, but something was holding us back from choosing one of them.
We didn’t throw darts at a map to decide, but a month ago we were not thinking South Carolina at all. Charleston just kind of came up out of nowhere in our consciousness near the beginning of March. Amanda had wanted to visit South Carolina ever since she did a report on the state in elementary school many years ago, but we never talked about going except for “maybe someday” types of comments. I didn’t know much at all about Charleston or South Carolina personally, but as I looked into it a couple of weeks before spring break, I was really intrigued by what I saw—we all were intrigued, I think, not just me. So we purchased some airline tickets, and less than two weeks later we were at 35,000 feet over El Paso en route to Charleston.
Even though spring break was from March 15th through the 23rd, we had some prior plans, so we couldn’t go exactly over the kids’ time off, and had to modify it a little. Thankfully, the schooling is flexible, and there were no issues with that aspect. As a bonus, flights were cheaper leaving Wednesday and returning Tuesday. It all just seemed to work out really well.
I wasn’t intending to write a travel series for this trip. Even when I got back home, my mind was on other things (such as completing and publishing the Universal Negative Recipe set). Now that nearly a week has gone by since returning back to Arizona, and I’ve had some time to sit on it, I decided that I should share our journey, in case some of you are also considering a trip to Charleston. Or maybe—like me—this city is not on your radar; however, you might just become intrigued as you learn more.
Day 1 — Wednesday, March 19th
Playing at the Playground – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Cinematic Film
We were very busy the days before the trip. All four kids were in The Sound of Music stage performance for the City of Goodyear. Johanna was Gretl von Trapp, while Joshua was Kurt. Joy was a nun and Jonathan was an Austrian. Some family had traveled from out-of-state to see it, and we were hosting until the day before our departure. We hurriedly completed last-minute errands and packed our bags. We got to bed around midnight. Then the alarm sounded at 2:45 am. It was time to get up so we could make our 6 am flight. Yikes!
This day is kind of a blur. We made it to the airport and through security without any issues, but we were definitely dragging. Once on the plane, we all tried to sleep, and I think we all did. We landed in Houston a few hours later, and changed planes. The connecting flight was in a different terminal, but aside from a lot of walking, it was pretty easy. We were still dragging, though. The flight from Houston to Charleston was fine, and we all tried to sleep a little more. This was a lot easier when I was in my 20’s.
We arrived in South Carolina, got our bags and rental car, and headed to our AirBnB, which was in North Charleston. The house was nice, but it’s proximity to Park Circle (a trendy neighborhood) was overstated on the listing, and maybe that’s why it was more affordable than the others in the area. Anyway, we made ourselves at home, maybe even took a short nap, and then it was dinnertime. At this point, the only thing we had eaten all day were the airplane snacks and some trail mix and granola bars we had brought with us.
After dinner, it was nearing sunset, so we found the park that is at the center of Park Circle, and let the kids run around and play for 30 minutes or so. There was a very nice and extensive playground for them to explore, and I can understand why it’s desirable for those with children to be near this location. I had grabbed my Fujifilm X-E4 with the Fujinon 27mm f/2.8 pancake before leaving the house. It’s such an easy camera to carry around, which makes it perfect for travel. I didn’t do much photography on this day, though. As the sun was disappearing, we were getting bit up by no-see-ums, so we called it good, and headed back to our AirBnB for the night.
Red Pole – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – RedScale
Palm & Oak – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Redscale
Day 2 — Thursday, March 20th
Above the Fence – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – Aerochrome v2
Due to the lack of sleep the day before, we decided to not set any alarms and just get rest—have an easy morning. So we slept in. And we were not yet used to the three-hour time difference, so by the time we got going for the day, the day was nearly half over. I suppose this was a recovery day of sorts.
While it was partly sunny in the late-morning and early-afternoon, it soon turned thick overcast and then poured rain for several hours, clearing out just after sunset. We explored Summerville a little, but the rain kept us mostly indoors. We had seen the forecast, so we didn’t make many plans for this day, figuring it best to wait until the weather was better to accomplish our agenda.
I got in a little photography, but not much. I used my Fujifilm GFX100S II with a Fujinon 80mm f/1.7 lens and my Fujifilm X-T4 ES (infrared) with a Fujinon 35mm f/2 lens around the house before the sun disappeared behind the clouds. After dinner, I grabbed a couple of snaps with my Fujifilm X-E4 and 27mm. Two days in, and the number of photographs I had created thus far could be counted on my fingers. I was a bit disappointed by that, but we were still early into the trip, and hadn’t really seen anything yet—the fun stuff was still upcoming.
Dried Plant Decor – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Fujicolor Film
When Fujifilm released the X-T50 last year, it had a new feature: a Film Dial. In my pursuit of figuring out how to use it effectively, I created the Film Dial Recipe set, a group of 14 Recipes that are really just one “Universal Recipe” (set of settings) that work well with any of the 20 film simulations (I grouped all four Acros options together, as well as all four Monochrome; hence 14 Recipes and not 20). This technique makes the X-T50—and now the X-M5, which also has the Film Dial—more versatile than the other X-series cameras for the straight-out-of-camera photographer. At least so I thought.
As it turns out, this technique can be used on any Fujifilm camera, simply by assigning one of the customizable knobs, wheels, rings, or buttons to activate the film simulation menu. The X-S10 and X-S20 have an unmarked knob on top that are factory-default set for this purpose. On other cameras, the rear command dial (R-Dial in the Fn settings menu) can be set to activate the film simulation menu. On my Fujifilm X100VI, I programmed the Control Ring to adjust the film simulation. On one hand the Film Dial is preferable: you can see what the film simulation is set to just by looking at the camera, it can be adjusted with the camera powered off, and it won’t reset when the camera is powered on. On the other hand, the non-Film Dial cameras are preferable: you have quick access to all 20 film simulations, and not limited by the 12 slots found on the Film Dial. There are advantages and disadvantages to both, and I prefer the Film Dial personally. But the light bulb moment for me was realizing that the Film Dial Recipe can be used on many cameras, and not just those with the Film Dial—I use it regularly on several different models, including my X100VI, X-T5, and GFX100S II.
Fujifilm’s film simulations are good straight-out-of-the-box, but with some parameter adjustments, they can become great. To get the most out of the various film simulations, you need to make changes to the factory-default settings (a.k.a. use Film Simulation Recipes). However, the Film Dial becomes problematic when you do this because rarely do multiple film simulations look good with the same Recipe settings. Sometimes they do, such as with Kodak Portra 400 v2, Vintage Vibes, and Ferrania Solaris FG 400, which require the same exact settings (note: set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off on X-Trans V), but use three different film simulations: Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, and Eterna Bleach Bypass. Most of the time, however, whenever you use a different film sim than what the Recipe calls for, the results are less than spectacular, such as when Omar Gonzalez accidentally used Classic Chrome instead of Classic Negative with the Agfa Vista 100 Recipe. Creating a “Universal Recipe” like the Film Dial Recipe is not an easy task.
Not content with having just one “Universal Recipe”, I set out to create another. I’ve been working on this one for more than three months now, and I’m excited to share it with you. It can be used in conjunction with the Film Dial on the X-T50 and X-M5; however, it can also be used on any fifth-generation X-Trans camera or even the latest GFX models. I created this Recipe on my Fujifilm X100VI, and all of the photos below were made using that camera. Also, if you don’t want to use it as a “Universal Recipe” but you like the results of just one of them—such as Classic Negative (a.k.a. “Fujicolor Superia 200”) below—simply use that one standalone. Or pick your favorite three and use it in conjunction with the Film Simulation Bracket feature.
I wanted this new universal option, which I’m calling Universal Negative, to be different than the Film Dial Recipe set. I didn’t want to merely repackage a small adjustment to it; I wanted something significantly divergent, and maybe a tad more film-like. Hopefully that’s what I accomplished here. My plan is to have both this Universal Negative Recipe set and the Film Dial Recipe set programmed into at least one of my cameras (right now it’s my X100VI), which really just opens up the opportunity to achieve various looks in-camera. It’s kind of like having C1-C35, instead of just C1-C7. While this is intended for fifth-generation models (currently: X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, and X-M5), it can also be used on X-Trans IV (except the X-T3 and X-T30); however, blue will render slightly less deeply on Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, Eterna, and Eterna Bleach Bypass, and some film sims won’t be available.
Film Simulation: Any (See Below) Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Strong, Small Color Chrome Effect: Strong Color Chrome FX Blue: Strong White Balance: 4000K, 0 Red & -5 Blue Highlight: 0 Shadow: -2 Color: -2 Sharpness: -2 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: 0 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: -1/3 to +2/3 (typically)
Additionally, for Acros and Monochrome, set Monochromatic Color to WC 0 & MG 0 (a.k.a. Off). Also, Color will be disabled for Acros, Monochrome, and Sepia. For Eterna and Acros, ISO can be up to ISO 12800.
Provia/STD — “Universal Provia”
This “Universal Provia” Recipe doesn’t much resemble real Provia film, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t produce an appealing aesthetic. It is true-to-life with a slight analog vibe, perhaps reminiscent of a Fujicolor Crystal Archive print. It’s kind of a Goldilocks Recipe—not too vibrant or muted, not too contrasty or flat, not too warm or cool. For best results, use in sunny daylight; however, it can do well in shade, indoor natural light, and even blue-hour with artificial light.
Velvia/Vivid — “Velvia 100F”
Velvia was the go-to film for vibrant landscape photography. If you wanted the colors to pop, Velvia 50 slide film is what you’d want to use. There were multiple versions of Velvia, and Velvia 100F (not to be confused with Velvia 100) was the least saturated of them all. This “Velvia 100F” Recipe isn’t strictly modeled after the emulsion, but it is in the ballpark, and close enough to name this after the film. This is an excellent option for colorful pictures that are not over-the-top vibrant. Great for sunny daylight landscapes, golden hour, sunrise/sunset, and even some nighttime situations.
Astia/Soft — “Indoor Astia”
This “Indoor Astia” Recipe is my favorite of all these for indoor natural light photography. It’s also good for sunny daylight, dreary overcast, and nighttime pictures. While this Recipe is more similar to actual Astia 100F film than the film simulation is when set to the factory default settings, it’s not necessarily a good match for the emulsion.
Classic Chrome — “Elite Chrome”
Elite Chrome was Kodak’s consumer-grade version of Ektachrome color slide film, produced in the late-1990’s and early-2000’s. While this “Elite Chrome” Recipe wasn’t modeled after the emulsion, surprisingly it does resemble Elite Chrome 100 film to a degree. For best results, use in sunny daylight; however, it does do well in overcast and blue hour light.
Reala Ace — “Retro Negative”
Reala Ace is Fujifilm’s newest film simulation. It’s purportedly based on Reala film, but it’s not a very close replication of that emulsion, which is in the Superia line, and more similar to Classic Negative. Instead, Reala Ace is nearer to the Fujicolor PRO 160 line, and shares similarities with PRO Neg. Std and PRO Neg. Hi. Reala Ace probably should have been named PRO Neg. C, since it is most similar to Fujicolor PRO 160C film. Of the three “PRO Neg.” film sims, Reala Ace is my personal favorite. This “Retro Negative” Recipe is reminiscent of color negative film from the 1980’s and ’90’s, and might even remind you of some photos printed in magazines from that time frame. I found it is quite excellent for golden hour and blue hour photography; however, it’s good for a lot of different subjects and situations, including rainy days, natural light indoors, and portrait photography.
PRO Neg. Hi — “Fuji Negative”
This “Fuji Negative” Recipe is generally similar to various Fujicolor negative films, without mimicking any one specifically. This is probably my favorite of this group for overcast light, but it also does well in sunny daylight and blue hour.
PRO Neg. Std — “Pulled Negative”
Pulling film means to overexpose a little, then reduce the development time to compensate. The results are lower contrast photos with less pop. You could consider this “Pulled Negative” Recipe a one-stop pulled version of the “Fuji Negative” Recipe above. This Recipe is one of the best of this group for artificial light situations, such as nighttime and indoors.
Classic Negative — “Fujicolor Superia 200”
This “Fujicolor Superia 200” Recipe is probably my favorite of this group. Inadvertently, it’s reminiscent of Fujicolor Superia 200 color negative film, which was introduced in 1998 and discontinued in 2017. I especially like this Recipe for indoor natural and artificial light situations; however, it’s good for many subjects and light scenarios.
Nostalgic Neg. – “Americana Film”
Nostalgic Neg. is the second most recent addition to the film simulation lineup, and is modeled after American New Color images from the 1970’s. The Nostalgic Neg. film simulation has a strong Kodak aesthetic, particularly photographic prints from five decades ago. This is the warmest film sim, which means that this “Americana Film” Recipe is the warmest of this group. It’s great for portraits or any situation where you want a retro rendering.
Eterna/Cinema — “Eterna Film”
This “Eterna Film” Recipe is the second lowest saturated and least contrasty of all the color options in this series. It has a lovely soft cinematic quality that is especially great for taming high-contrast scenes; however, it has a limited use-case where it does well. I had trouble finding scenarios where it was the most appropriate option for the situation, but occasionally I did.
Eterna Bleach Bypass — “Chrome City”
Eterna Bleach Bypass has the lowest saturation and highest contrast of all of the film simulations. Bleach bypass is a development technique where the bleach step is reduced or eliminated, resulting in a high-contrast, low-saturation image that almost appears like a B&W picture over a color picture. It can be used in still photography, but is more commonly found in motion pictures (think Saving Private Ryan). This “Chrome City” Recipe is reminiscent of LomoChrome Metropolis film, which is an emulsion by Lomography that mimics the aesthetic of the bleach bypass technique. The results from this Recipe can be spectacular, and it’s one of my favorites from this group; however, it’s definitely not for every subject or situation.
Fujifilm introduced Neopan Acros black-and-white negative film back in 1952. Neopan Acros came in four versions: ISO 100, ISO 400, ISO 1600, plus an ISO 400 version for C41 development that was actually repackaged Ilford XP2 Super 400. Neopan Acros was briefly discontinued in 2018, and reintroduced in 2019 as Neopan Acros 100 II. Curiously, the new version is actually manufactured by Harman (the parent company of Ilford), although it behaves quite similarly to the original.
Typically, I prefer contrasty black-and-white pictures; however, this “Acros Negative” Recipe is fairly low-contrast. It has to be used thoughtfully, or else the pictures will look slightly muddy. The Acros filter options (+Y, +R, +G) are your friend, and this Recipe thrives on high-contrast scenes. In the right situations, the results can be wonderful. For grainer pictures, use higher ISOs, as the Acros film sim has built-in Grain that increases with the ISO. If I could only pick one Acros option for the “Acros Negative” Recipe, I’d go with Acros+R.
The Monochrome film simulation is simply Provia with the color turned off. It was the standard B&W film sim until the introduction of Acros on X-Trans III. Generally speaking, I like Acros much more than Monochrome, as Acros has more of an analog feel to it; however, Monochrome does have a slightly harsher tonality, so there are times that the Monochrome film simulation could be preferable, and you might choose this “B&W Negative” Recipe. Similar to the “Acros Negative” Recipe above, this one thrives in high contrast light, and the filter options (+Y, +R, +G) are your friends.
Sepia — “B&W Sepia”
Last and least is Sepia. This film simulation has been around for a long time, but very few use it. If Fujifilm discontinued it, most probably wouldn’t even notice. Sepia is a darkroom technique where you bathe B&W prints in a chemical for archival and artistic purposes. Most commonly, Sepia baths are quick, and the toning subtle; however, the prints can be left in longer, resulting in a pronounced reddish/brown tone (this film simulation replicates that), which was popular a hundred or more years ago. For a more subtle effect, simply use either “Acros Negative” or “Monochrome Negative” with Monochromatic Color set to WC +2 MG -2. Most likely you’ll skip this one, but if you’re looking for something different, maybe give it a try.
Find these 14 Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
This is a one-year photo-a-day project called 52 Weeks of Photography. Even though it is a year-long undertaking, I’m taking it one week at a time, because it’s a little easier to manage many small blocks than one large chunk. This is the 13th week, so the 13th set of seven images, which means that I’m 25% finished. Wow, time flies!
The reason why I’m doing this 365 Day project is because I noticed some gaps in-between my images last year. I didn’t pick up my cameras daily. On several occasions, four or five days passed by without a single picture created. Twice in 2024, I skipped a whole week. I want to rectify this, and get back into the habit of daily photography. I also want to elevate the quality of my craft in 2025, and am hoping that this will help.
Sailer on Sumter – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Kodak Tri-X 400
The plan is to capture a year’s worth of notable images, either personally or artistically. Ansel Adams famously stated, “Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.” It’s important to keep expectations realistic, but I’m also trying to avoid thoughtless snapshots just to fulfill the day’s requirement. I want to push myself to be better, and hopefully that will happen. Not every photo will be great—in fact, most won’t—but I hope they are all at least decent enough to be shared without embarrassment. And maybe when the whole project is complete, there will be 12 significant pictures (out of the 365) that I’m particularly proud of.
Because it was my kids’ spring break, I spent the majority of this week in Charleston, South Carolina, which is an incredible city! I had no idea. It wasn’t on my radar, but I’m so glad that we visited. I’ll probably publish a series of articles that better details the trip, for those who might be interested. Anyway, when you travel, photographing every day is easy, so I had no problems completing this week’s assignment.
Without further ado, below are the 13th set of seven pictures from this 52 Weeks of Photography project.
Tuesday, March 18th, 2025
Sunshine on Bougainvillea – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X70 – Pro Film
Wednesday, March 19th, 2025
Storage Sunset – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 & 27mm f/2.8 – The Rockwell
Thursday, March 20th, 2025
Above the Fence – North Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-T4 ES & 35mm f/2 – Aerochrome v2
White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 & Fujinon 27mm – Pacific Blues
It’s better to invest your money in photographic experiences rather than new camera gear. Consider where you could go with the money that the new camera or lens will cost, and how much fun you might have wherever “there” is. I’m not saying never buy new gear, only that there’s no need to get every new thing that comes out, or right away when it is announced. While I have on occasion regretted a certain gear purchase, I’ve never once regretted traveling somewhere for photography.
A few days ago Fujifilm announced the GFX100RF, which I would love to own. Because it is so small and lightweight, I think it’s actually an ideal camera for a photographic project I started late last year, which will take place over a long period of time. This entails large panoramic prints of (hopefully) amazing landscapes, so you can probably understand how this particular camera might seem ideal. In anticipation of the announcement, and the excitement of announcement day, I had a lot of G.A.S. (“Gear Acquisition Syndrome”) and F.O.M.O. (“Fear of Missing Out”). After all, this is something that I really want, and arguably need.
Three Beach Umbrellas – Folly Beach, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 & Fujinon 27mm – Pacific Blues
Knowing that this camera was on the horizon, and knowing that I would have G.A.S. and F.O.M.O., I could have stretched the budget and put in my preorder purchase last week. Technically, I had the money. You see, my wife and I had been planning to take a trip over the kids’ spring break, and we wanted to take the family to someplace we’d never been. When things were becoming a bit more clear what the upcoming camera was going to be, we had a discussion about making the trip shorter and more local so that I could buy the new GFX. We hadn’t purchased any airline tickets yet or made hotel reservations, so it would have been easy. Instead, we decided to hold off on the gear, and use the money to fly to Charleston, South Carolina instead. We just arrived back in Arizona yesterday.
I had no idea just how cool and photogenic Charleston is. It was not a city on my radar. My wife had wanted to visit for quite awhile (since she did a research project on South Carolina in school many years ago), so we purchased airline tickets and found accommodations. We spent the money that we could have used to buy a new camera on an epic cross-country trip. It was amazing! I have zero regrets. It is quite obviously better to invest in experiences than new gear, and I’m quite happy that we chose to travel.
With that said, I feel even more strongly that the Fujifilm GFX100RF is a camera that I will eventually buy. It was such a pain to haul my GFX100S II, plus 80mm f/1.7 and 30mm f/3.5 lenses, through airport terminals and across town as we explored the city. My Fujifilm X-E4 with the 27mm f/2.8 pancake lens was a much better option for travel photography because it is so compact and lightweight. Unfortunately, that camera isn’t going to cut it for my panoramic project, but for general travel photography, it is quite excellent. I only wish there were a couple more pancake lenses available for it. My Fujifilm X100VI would have been great, too; however, I left it at home this time because I had just used it extensively over the last couple of months for a different project, so I wanted to give it a little rest.
Of course, I also brought along my Fujifilm X-T4 ES full-spectrum infrared camera. Of all the cameras I currently own, this is the one I’m having the most fun with right now. I’ve been considering making a book someday with the photos created using the Aerochrome v2 Recipe, but I have a long ways to go before I have a sufficient number of good images worthy of being published in a book. Without taking this camera on various travel experiences, such a book would be unlikely, or at least much less interesting.
Speaking of photographic experiences, I will be co-leading a photowalk with Ryan Faer and Lucas White in downtown Phoenix, Arizona, on Friday, April 4th, in partnership with Nuzira. The exact time and meetup location is TBD, but we will be photographing at the First Friday Art Walk, so that should give you an idea of the location and time (we will probably meet about 6 PM). If you live in the Phoenix area and want an excuse to get out with your camera, be sure to join us! Don’t forget to sign up (click here).
While you are signing up for that photowalk, consider joining Nuzira and my friend Christopher Berry on Saturday, April 5th, for a portrait lighting class at the Nuzira store in Scottsdale. If you have an interest in studio lighting or portrait photography, this is a class you’ll want to attend. The sign up form is on the same page as the photowalk.
This is a one-year photo-a-day project called 52 Weeks of Photography. Even though it is a year-long undertaking, I’m taking it one week at a time, because it’s a little easier to manage many small blocks than one large chunk. This is the 12th week, so the 12th set of seven images.
The reason why I’m doing this 365 Day project is because I noticed some gaps in-between my images last year. I didn’t pick up my cameras daily. On several occasions, four or five days passed by without a single picture created. Twice in 2024, I skipped a whole week. I want to rectify this, and get back into the habit of daily photography. I also want to elevate the quality of my craft in 2025, and am hoping that this will help.
Not Gursky – Goodyear, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
The plan is to capture a year’s worth of notable images, either personally or artistically. Ansel Adams famously stated, “Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.” It’s important to keep expectations realistic, but I’m also trying to avoid thoughtless snapshots just to fulfill the day’s requirement. I want to push myself to be better, and hopefully that will happen. Not every photo will be great—in fact, most won’t—but I hope they are all at least decent enough to be shared without embarrassment. And maybe when the whole project is complete, there will be 12 significant pictures (out of the 365) that I’m particularly proud of.
I did not finish the big Film Simulation Recipe project that last week I told you I was hoping to finish and share. I’m really close, so hopefully soon. I’m pretty sure I have all of the pictures that I need for it, I just have to finish writing it up and putting it together. We’re only a couple days away from the X Summit, and it probably won’t get published before then.
Without further ado, below are the 12th set of seven pictures from this 52 Weeks of Photography project.
Tuesday, March 11th, 2025
Parking Lot Sunset – Goodyear, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
Wednesday, March 12th, 2025
Ducks – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
Thursday, March 13th, 2025
Walk This Way – Goodyear, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
Friday, March 14th, 2025
Blood Moon– Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – The Rockwell
Saturday, March 15th, 2025
Pavilion Abstract– Goodyear, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Triple Exposure – Reggie’s Portra except with Reala Ace, and with a WB Shift adjustments between exposures
Sunday, March 16th, 2025
Girl on the Stairs – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
Fujifilm cameras are special. With 20 Film Simulations (on the latest models) that are crafted using Fujifilm’s vast experience with analog film, and the ability to fine-tune them into Recipes, you can achieve incredible straight-out-of-camera results. I’ve published nearly 400 Film Simulation Recipes, most of which are modeled after the aesthetics of classic film stocks. Some Recipes get all the attention, particularly those that are Classic Chrome-based, like Kodachrome 64 and Kodak Portra 400 v2. In this article, I’m going to suggest some lesser-used gems.
If you’re looking for something new to try—maybe one that is less commonly used—these five underrated Film Simulation Recipes deserve a spot in your camera’s Custom Settings. Give them a try, and you might just find your next go-to look!
Camera Conversation – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T5 – Fujifilm Negative – by Amanda Roesch
Fujifilm has a long history of producing amazing film stocks, and this Fujifilm Negative Recipe is inspired by their color negative films of the past, particularly Fujicolor PRO 160NS. With soft contrast, balanced colors, and a subtle vintage warmth, it creates a beautiful everyday look. Whether you’re shooting portraits, street photography, landscapes, or travel, Fujifilm Negative delivers a timeless feel that works in a variety of lighting conditions. Since this Recipe uses the new Reala Ace film sim, it is only compatible with fifth-generation X-series cameras, plus the newest GFX models.
Saguaro & Abandoned Building – Vulture City, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Ektachrome E100VS v1
If you love vibrant colors, the Kodak Ektachrome E100VS v1 Recipe is a fantastic choice. With an aesthetic similar to the slide film of the same name, which was one of my favorites 20 or 25 years ago, this Recipe produces deep blues, rich reds, and strong contrast that make images pop with its bold colors (thanks to the Velvia film sim that it uses). It’s perfect for colorful urban scenes, sunsets, landscapes, and travel photography. Since it uses Auto White Balance, it’s quite versatile; however, just like the film, it’s not a good choice for portrait photography. This Recipe is compatible with X-Trans IV (except the X-T3/X-T30) and X-Trans V cameras, plus newer GFX models.
The Eterna Film Simulation is often associated with soft, low-contrast tones, but the Eterna Summer Recipe adds warmth, vibrancy, and contrast. Sunlit scenes have a dreamy, vintage, and almost cinematic feel, with soft shadows and bright highlights. It’s especially great for roadtrips, urban scenes, portraits, and hot summer afternoons when you want to capture the golden essence of the season. For best results, use in sunny daylight situations. This Recipe is compatible with “newer” X-Trans IV cameras, all X-Trans V, and many GFX models.
City of Grace Tower – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – CineStill 400D v2
The CineStill 400D v2 Recipe is inspired by CineStill 400D film, which is known for its cinematic feel and warm tones. This Recipe produces soft highlights, slightly punchy colors, and a dream-like quality, making it a good choice for both daytime and blue-hour photography. CineStill 400D v2 uses the Astia Film Simulation, and is great for landscapes and street photography, especially during golden-hour. This Recipe is compatible with X-Trans IV (except the X-T3/X-T30) and X-Trans V cameras, plus the 100mp GFX models.
Fall at Boulder Lake – Clinton, CT – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Negative
The Kodak Negative Recipe, which is reminiscent of some vibrant negative film stocks by Kodak, is quite versatile, thanks to the use of Auto White Balance. It has the right amount of warmth, saturation, and contrast for many subjects and situations. Because it uses the Nostalgic Neg. Film Simulation, it has a vintage feel that is easy to appreciate. This Recipe is only compatible with the fifth-generation X-series cameras, plus the newest GFX models.
Final Thoughts
Rock Rings – Saguaro National Park, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Eterna Summer
These five underrated Film Simulation Recipes are waiting to be discovered! Whether you’re after a nostalgic analog look, a punchy slide film aesthetic, or a dreamy cinematic feel, there’s something here for your next photographic adventure. The best way to find out which Recipes are your favorites is to get out and try them—so load one of these Recipes into your Fujifilm camera and see what magic you can create!
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
While at the CP+ Show in Japan, PetaPixel interviewed Yuji Igarashi, who is the General Manager of the Professional Imaging Group, Imaging Solutions Division, of the Fujifilm Corporation. He said some interesting things regarding the Fujifilm X100VI production situation. Now, it’s important to take it with a grain of salt. Sometimes people will harshly judge an interpretation of what someone said in a different language, lacking grace for interpretation errors and dialect and cultural differences. Keeping that in mind, let’s get into it.
“We’ve more than doubled our production compared to the previous model,” Yuji Igarashi stated. “But on top of that, we are also still increasing production. Now we can produce higher than [15,000 units per month] and we have been, but it’s not like we can produce double that [amount again].”
Not much new there. Fujifilm told us from the outset that they had doubled production from the previous model, from 7,500 units per month to 15,000. We also already knew that for a year now they have been trying to increase production further. Fujifilm told PetaPixel that they have been unable to accomplish 30,000 units per month, but they are definitely beyond 15,000.
“We’ve been doing what we can to increase our production for the X100VI,” Yuji explained, “but the processes are quite complicated—especially for pieces like the top plate. To make these sharp edges, it goes through many processes. So, this type of camera is not so suited for ramping up production.” In other words, they’re doing all that they can, but there are significant challenges that prevent them from churning out even more cameras.
“In one year since we launched this product,” Yuji continued, “compared to the previous models which took us to sell three or four years, we’ve already shipped an equivalent amount.” This was shocking to me. Fujifilm is stating that—even with the manufacturing limitations—they have already built and delivered as many X100VI’s, which was released just one year ago, as the previous iteration over nearly a four year period. Just as many people have an X100VI in their hands as have an X100V, yet it only took Fujifilm one year to do that for the new camera vs four years for the X100V. And it’s a similar situation for the X100F and the previous versions.
This completely shreds the (quite stupid) theory that Fujifilm is purposefully creating shortages in order to manipulate the market. The unprecedented demand of the X100VI was and is real. No camera has been as in-demand as the X100VI ever. In all of history, no model from any brand received more preorders than the X100VI, it’s not even close. Despite building a ton of copies, Fujifilm has not yet met the initial demand, but they’re getting close. “So I know people are quite frustrated when they say it’s still not available,” Yuji said. “I think one issue is that the first-day orders were so big when it was announced, that’s why people say they’ve been waiting for eight, or 10 months, which we totally understand is so frustrating. So until we clear that, some people will still continue to say, ‘We’ve been waiting for 10 months.'”
Now you might say that the math isn’t mathing. If Fujifilm hasn’t been able to quadruple production, how could they possibly build as many units in one year as they did over nearly four? First, Fujifilm produced a bunch of copies in the months prior to the camera’s announcement, in anticipation of strong initial demand. Also, the X100V was effected by the pandemic parts shortage, which for a time limited the number of copies they could manufacture. If Fujifilm managed to make (say) 300,000 units, that would likely be close to the total number of X100V’s manufactured in total. And that 300K guesstimate might be in the ballpark. We know that 180,000 were manufactured at a minimum post launch, and 60,000 might have been manufactured prior to launch. If Fujifilm has been able to increase production by 6,000 units on average over the last 10 months, then you’d have 300K. While that’s a lot of cameras, apparently there were around 500,000 day-one preorders in China alone, so the initial demand has still not been met a whole year later.
Thankfully, slowly but surely Fujifilm is catching up. Here and there the X100VI has been seen in-stock at camera stores, particularly the black version. If you want to buy one, the wait isn’t nearly as long now. You might still have to be patient for a month or maybe a few, but the 10-month-long waits are in the past. It’s a good time to get your order in if you’ve been waiting. Or, if you’ve been hoping to find it at a local camera store, they might just have one right now—maybe.
The challenge for Fujifilm is to tread carefully on production numbers. If they suddenly find that the demand has been met, and they’re building over 20,000 units per month, they could end up overproducing a lot of copies. Since it takes months from the time parts are ordered until finished cameras are delivered, if the market suddenly shifts, it’s possible that Fujifilm could manufacture a hundred thousand copies more than are needed and can be sold. That amount of overproduction would be a tough blow to the bottom line, and possible could cripple the camera division. As wait times dwindle, Fujifilm should strongly considered reducing the number of units that they manufacture monthly. At some point, 15,000 copies each month will be much too much. Hopefully that is a long ways off, but it will arrive eventually, and it will need to be handled quite carefully when it approaches.
This is a one-year photo-a-day project called 52 Weeks of Photography. Even though it is a year-long undertaking, I’m taking it one week at a time, because it’s a little easier to manage many small blocks than one large chunk. This is the 10th week, so the 10th set of seven images. I can’t believe that I’m nearly 1/5th finished!
The reason why I’m doing this 365 Day project is because I noticed some gaps in-between my images last year. I didn’t pick up my cameras daily. On several occasions, four or five days passed by without a single picture created. Twice in 2024, I skipped a whole week. I want to rectify this, and get back into the habit of daily photography. I also want to elevate the quality of my craft in 2025, and am hoping that this will help.
Ford Falcon – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
The plan is to capture a year’s worth of notable images, either personally or artistically. Ansel Adams famously stated, “Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.” It’s important to keep expectations realistic, but I’m also trying to avoid thoughtless snapshots just to fulfill the day’s requirement. I want to push myself to be better, and hopefully that will happen. Not every photo will be great—in fact, most won’t—but I hope they are all at least decent enough to be shared without embarrassment. And maybe when the whole project is complete, there will be 12 significant pictures (out of the 365) that I’m particularly proud of.
A lot of personal things came up this week. There were a couple of time that I thought I was going to fail. Somehow I managed to photograph each day, and I think it is because of the habits formed during the first nine weeks—if the same obstacles had presented themselves earlier in the project, I’m confident that I wouldn’t have completed it. Because those habits had cemented themselves already, it helped tremendously. Life happens, so I built into this project two days that can be missed. At some point I know that I’ll need to use those, but I’d rather save them for later if possible, and thankfully it was possible.
Below are the 10th set of seven pictures from this 52 Weeks of Photography project.
I said something in my Is $5,000 A Bargain or Bust? article that caught a couple people’s attention. In regards to the upcoming fixed-lens GFX camera, I stated, “I really hope for conversion lenses—both wide and telephoto—like the X100-series has. I highly doubt that the WCL-X100 and TCL-X100 will work on it (although it would blow my mind if they somehow did), but something similar should be made for the GFX100RF.” I received two messages from people wanting to further discuss the idea that the wide and telephoto conversion lenses for X100-series cameras might be compatible with the upcoming medium-format model.
Just to be clear from the top, I’m highly skeptical that the WCL-X100 and TCL-X100 will be officially compatible with the GFX100RF. It’s possible that they might be, but that seems like improbable engineering. I don’t think Fujifilm designed the lens on the new camera to be compatible with those two conversion lenses. More likely—if there are conversion lenses—new ones will be designed specifically for the GFX camera. But…
There’s a strong likelihood that you could actually use those two conversion lenses if you want to. Now, the camera is unlikely to account for and fix the distortion (unless the engineers programmed it to). There’s a good chance that the conversion lenses won’t cover the whole frame, or—if it does—there could be strong vignetting and soft corners. But maybe it won’t be as bad as you might think. For example, Pentax Auto-110 lenses, which are tiny, cover the APS-C sensor. The Helios 44-2 lens, which is for 35mm cameras, fully covers the GFX sensor. So there is a possibility that the WCL-X100 and TCL-X100 conversion lenses will cover most or maybe even all of the GFX sensor.
If they don’t, that may not be a big deal. Using a different aspect ratio will likely crop out whatever isn’t covered. If the conversion lenses cover almost all of frame, then the 3:2 ratio might be all you need. If the coverage isn’t quite that good, 16:9, 65:24, and 1:1 should do the trick. Or, with 100mp to work with, a simple crop should do—I could see using the teleconverter lens in conjunction with the in-camera digital teleconverter, which would crop out whatever isn’t covered.
The real question is if the adapter ring on the GFX100RF will be the same size as the X100-series. My guess is no. Most likely it will be larger on the GFX—I think that’s a pretty safe assumption. In the unlikely case that it is the same size, you’d be able to just screw on the conversion lenses just like you would on the X100VI. Much more likely, you would need a step-down ring to attach the conversion lenses. This would have (at least) two side effects: less coverage of the sensor, and more close-focusing capabilities—maybe even macro—like using an extension tube.
My hope is that Fujifilm releases conversion lenses for the upcoming GFX100RF. If they don’t, or if they do but they’re unaffordable or difficult to find in stock, then adapting the WCL-X100 and TCL-X100 should be possible; however, it may not be ideal. There will certainly be some vignetting and soft corners, and they probably will not cover 100% of the GFX sensor, among other potential issues. But, technically speaking, it should work. If I do purchase the upcoming camera at some point in the future, I’ll be sure to test it out and report back to you what I discover.
Fujifilm is renown in the photography world for blending modern technology with vintage styling, delivering an experience similar to classic film cameras with colors inspired by analog looks. While newer models often steal the spotlight, some older Fujifilm cameras remain hidden gems—overlooked, yet still highly capable. These cameras seem to pair especially well with my Film Simulation Recipes for straight-out-of-camera photos that don’t require editing. If you’re looking for a capable, budget-friendly camera that embraces the magic of Fujifilm’s film simulations, consider these four hidden treasures.
Fujifilm X-T1: The Classic Workhorse
Released in 2014, the Fujifilm X-T1 was a game-changer for the X-series. It introduced the rugged, SLR-style design with dedicated dials that many Fujifilm photographers love. With a 16mp X-Trans II sensor, the X-T1 may not have all the latest film simulations and JPEG options, or stats that impress compared to the latest models, but don’t let that fool you—it still produces fantastic images in 2025.
This was one of the first cameras with Classic Chrome, which is the long-time most popular film simulation for those who use Recipes. Kodachrome II, Kodachrome 64, Classic Kodak Chrome, and Kodacolor are a few of the Classic Chrome Recipes that work beautifully on the X-T1, producing a vintage film-like aesthetic straight-out-of-camera. The Fujifilm X-T1 is an excellent introduction to the Fujifilm experience without breaking the bank, and it’s easy to recommend as someone’s first interchangeable-lens model to learn photography on.
Fujifilm X-T1 & Kodak Portra 160 Recipe
Fujifilm X-T1 & Kodak Portra 160 Recipe
Fujifilm X-T1 & Ektachrome 100SW Recipe
Fujifilm X-Pro2: The Soul of Film Photography
The Fujifilm X-Pro2 is a dream camera for photographers who love the rangefinder experience. Introduced in 2016, it was the first Fujifilm camera with the 24mp X-Trans III sensor and the first to feature Acros, one of my favorite film simulations. This camera was a notable step forward in emulating film-like results thanks to added JPEG options like faux grain. Of the three X-Pro iterations, the X-Pro2 is my personal favorite.
This camera is a fantastic choice for those who want an analog-like shooting experience. With its optical/electronic hybrid viewfinder and vintage aesthetics, it feels like using an old film camera. Recipes like Vintage Kodachrome, Kodachrome II, Kodak Gold 200, and Acros Push Process (to name a few) look great on the X-Pro2. This camera is especially great for manual vintage lenses, which makes the experience even more retro.
Fujifilm X-Pro2 & Kodachrome II Recipe
Fujifilm X-Pro2 & Provia Slide Recipe
Fujifilm X-Pro2 & Acros Recipe
Fujifilm X-T20: The Compact Powerhouse
When I met Omar Gonzalez on a Manhattan rooftop last year, he seemingly wasn’t carrying a camera. So I asked him if he brought one with him, and, if so, which one? He smiled, and pulled out of his sweater pocket a Fujifilm X-T20. He then told me that the X-T20 is his everyday casual camera for just walking around with. That should speak volumes. He also mentioned that the C1-C7 Custom Setting Presets were filled with Fuji X Weekly Recipes.
With the same X-Trans III sensor as the X-Pro2 and X-T2, the Fujifilm X-T20 offers exceptional image quality in a more compact, lightweight body—ideal for street photographers, travelers, and creatives on the go. Despite its size, the X-T20 retains the essential dials that make Fujifilm cameras so enjoyable to use. Recipes like Provia Slide, Everyday Astia, Agfa Optima, and Agfa Scala produce stunning yet nostalgic images on this camera. The X-T20 is an excellent choice for photographers who want a mix of convenience, quality, and affordability.
Fujifilm X-T20 & Kodachrome II Recipe
Fujifilm X-T20 & Velvia Recipe
Fujifilm X-T20 & Fujicolor Pro 400H Recipe
Fujifilm X30: The Forgotten Compact
The Fujifilm X30 might just be the most underrated Fujifilm camera. This fixed-lens compact camera from 2014 features a 2/3-inch 12mp X-Trans II sensor and a 28-112mm (full-frame-equivalent) f/2.0-2.8 lens that has a lot of character. It’s small size is ideal for everyday carry, yet it is quite versatile thanks to the zoom lens.
The pictures from this camera are amazing, with a ton of character—I especially love the lens flare. The photos are instant memories, and that’s the selling point of the X30, as the spec sheet is not especially impressive, and the camera seems a bit outdated in 2025. Recipes like Pro Film, Lomography Color 100, CineStill 800T, and Monochrome Red are excellent options. The X30 is an everyday-carry camera—just grab it while heading out the door on ordinary outings.
Fujifilm X30 & Kodachrome 64 Recipe
Fujifilm X30 & Pro Film Recipe
Fujifilm X30 & CineStill 800T Recipe
Conclusion
While the latest Fujifilm cameras have more features and film simulations, these four underrated models remain exceptional tools for photographers who appreciate the magic of film simulations and Recipes. Each one offers a unique experience: the rugged reliability of the X-T1, the rangefinder soul of the X-Pro2, the compact power of the X-T20, and the travel-friendly versatility of the X30.
When paired with the right Film Simulation Recipes, these cameras prove that you don’t need the newest gear to get great results. If you’re looking for a Fujifilm camera that delivers timeless images and an engaging shooting experience, don’t overlook these hidden gems. You might just discover your new favorite camera.
Find these Film Simulation Recipes in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Purportedly, Fujifilm is about to shake up the medium-format world with their upcoming 100mp fixed-lens GFX camera: GFX100RF. This upcoming model, rumored to be priced around $5,000, will feature a high resolution 100mp sensor paired with a fixed 35mm f/4 lens (28mm full-frame-equivalent, or 18.5mm APS-C-equivalent). Apparently, it will be about the same size as an X-Pro model. While this might sound like a dream camera for some, others may wonder whether it’s actually a good value—will it even be worthwhile at that price point. Let’s talk about this.
I want to start with this disclaimer: I don’t have any inside information on the upcoming camera. Fujifilm hasn’t shared anything about it with me, not even if there is a camera forthcoming, or if any camera is forthcoming. I only know as much as the next person, and what I do know I read on Fujirumors. Patrick has a pretty solid track record, so there’s a good chance that everything he has shared about the camera is correct, but until it is announced by Fujifilm, nothing can be known with 100% certainty. In other words, anytime that we’re discussing rumors, it should be taken with a grain of salt. We will all know everything when it is announced in March, and, until then, it’s only speculation.
Some might see the upcoming Fujifilm GFX100RF camera as a fantastic value. Not all that long ago, a digital medium-format camera would set you back at least $10,000, if not $30,000 or even $60,000. When Pentax released the 50mp 645Z in 2014 at “only” $8,500, it shocked the camera world because it seemed to be impossibly inexpensive for what it was. Beginning in 2017, Fujifilm basically took things a step further, and in the process became the leader in medium-format, by offering the GFX50S and GFX50R for $6,500 and $4,500 respectively. Since then, prices have continued to come down while the capabilities of these cameras have increased.
The Fujifilm GFX100S II has an MSRP of $5,000. It has the same sensor and processor as the upcoming GFX100RF. A couple advantages of the GFX100S II are that it is an interchangeable-lens model, and it has IBIS; some disadvantages are that it is much bigger/heavier, it requires the purchase of a lens, and it is PASM (not the traditional Fujifilm tactile controls). Essentially, you exchange IBIS for a lens, and get a retro-styled body about the size of an X-Pro3. The most similar lenses in the GF lineup are the 30mm f/3.5 (closest focal-length) and 50mm f/3.5 (closest size), which cost $1,700 and $1,000 respectively. An argument can be made that the GFX100RF is an excellent value at “only” $5,000, considering that the lens is included.
The big advantage of the upcoming camera is, of course, size and weight, and the retro design. My speculation is that it will be the thinest ever digital medium-format body/lens combination, and maybe even the “smallest” (depending on exactly how one defines that). Comparisons will be made to the Hasselblad 907X (plus CFV 100C back) with the 45mm f/4 or 28mm f/4 lens, which is much more expensive at over $9,000 (interestingly, the Hasselblad does not have IBIS, and we’re talking about f/4 lenses…).
I think a lot of the complaints circling the internet about the upcoming GFX100RF are from those who were unlikely to buy the camera in the first place. There was always going to be an excuse. It doesn’t have IBIS. The maximum aperture is too small. It has a fixed lens. The cost is too much. If only the engineers had pulled off miracle after miracle after miracle, then they would purchase. But since the designers were limited to things like reality, what a stupid camera that nobody will buy! Of course, I disagree with that completely.
Oak Creek – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Nostalgia Negative
The lack of IBIS will deter some, no doubt. There’s a myth that more megapixels make camera shake more noticeable, but that’s simply not true. A blurry picture is blurry no matter the resolution, and a sharp picture is sharp no matter the resolution. The same rules for achieving sharp photos apply exactly the same to 10mp as 100mp. But that doesn’t mean IBIS isn’t a useful feature that’s worthwhile to have. Some see it as essential, and the lack of it on the GFX100RF will prevent them from purchasing; however, I don’t see this as a big issue for most potential buyers.
Also, the f/4 lens is not especially exciting. This maximum aperture is not uncommon on GFX lenses, and produces a depth-of-field similar to f/2 on APS-C. People looking at it from an APS-C or full-frame perspective might find it shocking, but those in the medium-format world will see it as pretty normal, similar to how f/2 is common for the X-series.
The proper take, in my opinion, is that this camera isn’t for everyone, or even for most. The GFX system as a whole is not for everyone, or even for most. The vast majority of photographers don’t need a GFX camera. Some do, and it is available for them. Some don’t, yet enjoy the system anyway. For the majority, the X-system is a better option, in terms of value, enjoyment, size, and even capabilities. It’s not “trash” or “dumb” just because you personally don’t need it, or because it doesn’t have all of the specs that you wished it would, or because it is priced above what you can reasonably pay for a new camera. I think it’s ok to say, “That camera will be nice, but it’s not for me.”
So, then, who will the GFX100RF be for? First, it will be compelling for those who want a compact and lightweight medium-format camera. The size/weight aspect alone will make it desirable. This camera will be great for roadtrips and exploring, something that the other GFX models are not especially ideal for. I suspect that a significant group of GFX owners will buy it as a second camera for this purpose. Second, it will be for those who prefer retro styling and traditional tactile controls. The only other retro GFX camera is the 50R, which is long-discontinued and approaching seven-years-old. While that camera was considered a bit of a sales flop, it has since gained a cult-like following. Retro for Fujifilm isn’t just about trendy styling, it’s about functionality and fun. Third, it will be seen by some as the long-overdue and long-hoped-for successor to the Fujifilm X70, which has grown in popularity over the last several years. The upcoming camera is certainly not a direct followup to the X70, but I think there are enough similarities that some will see it as a spiritual successor nonetheless. Fourth, it will be seen as a larger-sensor X100-like camera, so some of the hype of the X100VI will carry over to the GFX100RF. Fifth, it will serve as a gateway into GFX. The X100-series has been a lot of people’s introduction to Fujifilm; likewise, the GFX100RF will be some people’s first GFX camera. This is because it’s an all-in-one model, and no further investment is needed to get started. It’s a way to dip your toes into the pool before deciding if you want to jump all the way in. Between those five groups, I suspect that sales will be strong, but only time will tell just how well it does.
I really hope for conversion lenses—both wide and telephoto—like the X100-series has. I highly doubt that the WCL-X100 and TCL-X100 will work on it (although it would blow my mind if they somehow did), but something similar should be made for the GFX100RF. A 0.9x wide-converter (25mm full-frame-equivalent, or 16.5mm APS-C-equivalent) or 0.8x wide-converter (22mm full-frame-equivalent, or 14.5mm APS-C-equivalent), and a 1.4x teleconverter (39mm full-frame-equivalent, 26mm APS-C-equivalent), would make the camera much more compelling. If these two conversion lenses were $500 or less each, and a compact three-lens “system” was possible for only $6,000, that would make it seem like a better bargain.
While some are suggesting that the price will cause the upcoming Fujifilm GFX100RF to be a bust, I really don’t think that will be the case; however, GFX is a niche line, and sales figures will never approach that of the X-series. It won’t sell nearly as many copies as the X100VI, or X-M5, or X-T5, etc.. But will it prove to be profitable? I’m pretty confident that it will. And if it is, I’m hopeful that it will convince Fujifilm to begin work on the GFX100R, a long-overdue successor to the GFX50R. If this camera does well, it might bring with it a whole new era of retro-style medium-format cameras.
Yellow Brush, Pink Sand – White Sands NP, NM – Fujifilm GFX100S II + 80mm f1.7 – Kodak Gold Max 400 Expired
Last year, WEX Photo Video asked if I’d be interested in assembling a Fujifilm-related camera bundle. It could be anything that I wanted, just as long as the products made sense together. I decided on a first-time-Fujifilm type of kit. If you are in the market for your very first Fujifilm camera, this bundle would serve as an excellent all-in-one starting point.
The camera I chose for this bundle is the Fujifilm X-T50. It’s simple and fun enough for beginners, yet sophisticated and capable enough for advanced users—in other words, the camera will keep up with you as you grow. No matter where you are on your photographic journey—from brand-new hobbyist to experienced pro—the Fujifilm X-T50 is an excellent camera, so it’s easy to recommend. The silver version is my favorite, so that’s what I chose for the bundle.
“Fuji X Weekly is an amazing resource for photography enthusiasts, especially those diving into the world of Fujifilm. Created by Ritchie Roesch, Fuji X Weekly has become the go-to for Fujifilm photographers looking to explore their camera’s potential. Known for its collection of Film Simulation Recipes, Fuji X Weekly empowers users to recreate the iconic looks of classic film stocks directly in their cameras without the need for post-processing. This bundle celebrates the creativity that Fuji X Weekly represents and is picked by Ritchie to offer you a perfect starting point to explore the Fujifilm system and capture stunning images with ease.”
—Wex Photo Video
What’s a camera without a lens? The Fujinon 35mm f/2 is one of my favorites. It’s small, lightweight, optically excellent, and affordable. I’ve owned this lens for a long time, and still use it regularly. On X-series cameras, because of the APS-C crop factor, it’s a “nifty-fifty” standard prime, something every photographer should have, and the perfect lens for learning composition. The silver version of the Fujinon 35mm f/2 looks strikingly good on the silver X-T50.
To complete the kit, included is a spare NP-W126S battery, SanDisk Extreme 256GB SD Card, and SmallRig Leather Half Case. A memory card is essential to get started, and this SanDisk is one that I personally have in a few of my cameras. The extra battery isn’t essential, but very nice to have—especially for traveling—so I wanted it included. The SmallRig Half Case adds a little style and extra protection.
Altogether, these five items—silver Fujifilm X-T50 camera, silver Fujinon 23mm f/2 lens, spare battery, 256GB SD Card, and leather half case—is an excellent kit for someone just getting started with Fujifilm. With this bundle, you’re good to go—there’s nothing else you need to buy to begin your photographic journey.
This Fuji X Weekly + Wex Photo Video collaborative bundle is not available anywhere else. Fujifilm doesn’t offer the X-T50 and 35mm f/2 as a kit (they should!). The only place you can get these bundled together is at Wex. Right now, this kit is only £1,661.90 (about $2,100 USD). The MSRP for these five items, if purchased separately, is £1,841.90; however, because the X-T50 and 35mm lens are currently on sale, the price is £180 less. There’s no extra discount for purchasing these items together; this is meant to simplify the purchasing process for someone in the market for their first Fujifilm camera.
Find nearly 400 Film Simulation Recipes for Fujifilm cameras in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Across the Grand Expanse – Grand Canyon, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodachrome 64
When it comes to travel photography, nothing quite matches Fujifilm’s Classic Chrome film simulation. Inspired by Kodak’s color slide films—such as Kodachrome and Ektachrome—that were commonly used for documentary photography, Classic Chrome delivers muted tones, rich contrast, and a subtle warmth that evoke the look of classic photojournalism. Whether you’re exploring bustling cities, vast landscapes, or quiet villages, this film simulation brings a distinct analog feel reminiscent of past eras to your images.
The magic of Classic Chrome for travel photography is that it adapts well to various lighting environments, from golden-hour sunsets to harsh midday light to dreary overcast scenes to neon nightscapes. The balance of true-to-life yet expressive colors and rich contrast make it perfect for unpredictable travel conditions, enhancing the mood of a scene, and producing images with a timeless and immersive feel. Classic Chrome doesn’t exaggerate colors—it enhances them in a way that lets the subject take center stage.
Whether you’re capturing a quaint coastal town, the details of a historic city, the vastness of a dusty desert, the vibrancy of a street market, or the bustle of an urban sidewalk, Classic Chrome adapts beautifully. It provides a vintage, editorial look that is just as effective for street photography as it is for landscapes. This film simulation enhances the story within the image, where emotion and authenticity matter more than exaggerated aesthetics.
Classic Chrome is the most popular film simulation among those who use Film Simulation Recipes, and it’s easy to understand why. With 90 Classic Chrome Recipes in the Fuji X Weekly App, there’s bound to be a few that match your style. If you’re unsure which ones to try, below are 10 Recipes that are quite excellent for travel photography.
This is a one-year photo-a-day project called 52 Weeks of Photography. Even though it is a year-long undertaking, I’m taking it one week at a time, because it’s a little easier to manage many small blocks than one large chunk. This is the eighth week, so the eighth set of seven images.
The reason why I’m doing this 365 Day project is because I noticed some gaps in-between my images last year. I didn’t pick up my cameras daily. On several occasions, four or five days passed by without a single picture created. Twice in 2024, I skipped a whole week. I want to rectify this, and get back into the habit of daily photography. I also want to elevate the quality of my craft in 2025, and am hoping that this will help.
GFX100S II & 30mm – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4 & 90mm f/2 – Reggie’s Portra
The plan is to capture a year’s worth of notable images, either personally or artistically. Ansel Adams famously stated, “Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.” It’s important to keep expectations realistic, but I’m also trying to avoid thoughtless snapshots just to fulfill the day’s requirement. I want to push myself to be better, and hopefully that will happen. Not every photo will be great—in fact, most won’t—but I hope they are all at least decent enough to be shared without embarrassment.
I wasn’t especially productive or unproductive this week. There are a handful of photographs that I really like, and a fair number of mediocre ones. I do feel that grabbing a camera and making pictures daily is becoming more natural—I believe the habit is setting in; however, I do need to press myself to be more creative on some days.
Below are the eighth set of seven pictures from this 52 Weeks of Photography project.
Tuesday, February 11th, 2025
Cat Under Arch – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
Wednesday, February 12th, 2025
Night Owl – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 30mm f/3.5 – Kodak Tri-X 400
Thursday, February 13th, 2025
Leaf on a Wet Windshield – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
Friday, February 14th, 2025
Seat Stripes– Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Upcoming Recipe
Saturday, February 15th, 2025
Light on a Dark Wall – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 & 27mm f/2.8 – RedScale
