One benefit of having your own website is that you get to say whatever you want. It’s your platform, and nobody can tell you what you can or cannot state. They’re your opinions; if someone doesn’t like them, they’re free to leave and never come back. As the saying goes, everyone has opinions….
I don’t typically like to comment on the opinions of others, because they’re free to express their own, just as I’m free to express my own. I don’t have to like what they say, just as nobody who visits this website has to agree with everything that I say. We can disagree on things and still be friends (at least it should be that way, and it used to be). Arguments on the internet tend to be pointless endeavors that don’t do much good.
There’s an article I read on a photography website that I’m just really baffled by. I wasn’t going to say anything, though. Is it even my place? After all, they’re allowed to write whatever they want on their own page. If I don’t like it, I’m free to not return. Their article, though, has been bothering me for a few days now, so I thought maybe I should address it. Perhaps you read it, too, and are equally puzzled.
Initially I wasn’t even going to link the article in this post, because maybe I shouldn’t drive traffic to their website. Sometimes when people post outrageous things it is for attention, so maybe I’m doing just what they hoped people would do, and I’m falling for it hook, line and sinker. It’s a fairly popular and well-known page, so you could easily find it if you wanted to. But, for the sake of transparency, the website is The Phoblographer, and the article is their Fujifilm X100VI review by Chris Gampat, the founder and chief-editor of the site.
Here’s an interesting fact about The Phoblographer that I didn’t know until I was researching for this: they don’t have much more traffic than Fuji X Weekly. According to data available on the internet (which might not be 100% accurate), they get roughly about 10% more visitors than I do. They’re way more established, having been founded in 2009 (Fuji X Weekly dates back to 2017). At the current rate of growth, it’s probable that this website will exceed their’s by the end of the year, or possible sooner. I must be doing something very wrong, though, because they’re somehow able to support five employees off of that traffic.
Anyway, Fujifilm gave The Phoblographer a preproduction copy of the X100VI to try out, and Chris Gampat wrote about it. And he gave it a scathing review. Interestingly, Chris gave the X100V a five-star review, saying that it was “the closest they’ve come to a perfect camera.” Somehow, in a little less than four years, with some updates and improvements, it’s gone from nearly perfect to one-star, the lowest Chris could give. If you are Fujifilm and reading this, in the future perhaps you should consider sending your preproduction copies to someone else instead.
Now Chris is entitled to his opinions. He doesn’t have to be all-positive, and I don’t think anyone expects him or anyone else to be overtly optimistic about any gear. Being genuine is valuable. Authenticity is what people want. Overly positive reviews can seem dishonest, but so can overly negative reviews. Especially when the nearly-identical predecessor camera was “close to perfect”; somehow the barely different but definitely improved successor is “the embodiment of the word ‘meh.'” It just doesn’t make any sense. It doesn’t pass the smell test.
On one hand, Chris’ review reads like a toddler-tantrum after not getting his way. I guess he thought the “nearly perfect” camera was somehow due for a major overhaul (ignoring “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” I suppose); since he didn’t get his way, it’s now garbage (or, as he puts it: a TikTok fashion accessory that’s actually a toy camera; Fujifilm betrayed him with this model). Many of the things that he liked about the X100V he now dislikes about the X100VI, despite them being the same. Stomping and kicking and screaming will surely get Fujifilm’s attention, no? Maybe he’s simply upset that this model is so popular, and soon there will be too many Star-Bellied Sneetches with it for his liking (time to get that star removed, eh?). Perhaps their partnerships with other brands is driving the over-the-top negativity? As they say, follow the money and you’ll find the truth. I don’t know what the answer is, but whatever the case, it’s baffling. And dishonest, even though he self-proclaims that he’s being “very honest” in the opening paragraph, and not to believe others. If you have to state that up front, that’s a big red-flag.
What I found humorous is that he doesn’t like anything above ISO 800 for color photography, apparently. I guess he wouldn’t appreciate my GAF 500 Film Simulation Recipe, which uses ISO 12800 on purpose for the aesthetic of it. Or my Expired Eterna Recipe, which can be used as high as ISO 51200!
I’ve not touched or seen in real life a Fujifilm X100VI, but I have a Fujifilm X100V and a Fujifilm X-T5 (which collectively provide for me the experience of the outside and inside of the X100VI), and I disagree completely with many of his complaints. It’s perfectly ok to have some complaints, and I’m not saying Chris doesn’t have some valid criticisms; however, the one-star rating and excessive scathing complaints seem way unfair. Instead, say: I wish they had done this or that, and since they didn’t, it’s four-stars (or three-stars; something that seems remotely fair, unlike one-star). That would be honest and authentic.
In any event, The Phoblographer (faux-blographer?) has lost a lot of credibility with me, personally. I give them a one-star review. It’s clear—when it comes to X-series cameras, anyway—that they’re not a trustworthy source whatsoever. It’s a real shame, too, because I’m sure that they could bring some unique point-of-views to the table that could be valuable to somebody, if only they could get out of their own way (but they couldn’t and so didn’t). They’re missing the boat on what is sure to be the most-desired camera of 2024, and maybe of all time; however, that’s their choice. This was a curios decision that I don’t understand, but it’s important to not take any of it personal. I’m sure that Chris and everyone else at The Phoblographer are very nice people in real life.
Maybe their article will provide them with a much-needed traffic boost. Maybe it will prove to be the beginning of the end for them—the moment that they jumped the shark, so to speak. I have no idea if there will be any positive or negative consequences to their review. I’m just really baffled by it all, and I wonder if Fujifilm—or even the other camera brands—have taken notice. How will they respond? I don’t think the one-star review is having any impact on sales.
I did order the Fujifilm X100VI, approximately six minutes after it was available for preorders. I don’t expect to be in the first batch that’ll be shipped on February 28th, but if mine arrives before the end of March I’ll count myself as lucky. It’s easy to have FOMO (fear of missing out) when this camera is all that everyone seems to be talking about, but just know that whatever camera you have is pretty good. It’s a positive exercise to go back to the old reviews of your gear and read the glowing praise, which serves as a reminder that the cameras we own are plenty good enough. New gear won’t make you a better photographer. A camera like the X100VI can be a lot of fun, and sometimes that enjoyment can motivate us to use our gear more. There are plenty of ways to find renewed enjoyment from our old gear, such as trying different Film Simulation Recipes, using vintage lenses, or simply taking it on adventures. Experiences are often better investments than new gear.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Fujifilm X100VI in black: Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex
Fujifilm X100VI in silver: Amazon, B&H, Moment, Wex
It’s about time someone dressed down Chris Gampat. He’s so obnoxious and annoying that I long ago stopped subscribing to his site. All he does is complain and whenever someone challenges him he blocks them from posting their opinions on his site.
I guess I wasn’t intending to dress him down, but I felt that something needed to be said by someone.
Understood, and I have nothing against him personally, but there’s a lot of noise (and harmful pontification) out there, and I feel a responsible community calls out sources that might be considered biased or disinformation (to whatever degree).
I think calling out AI articles, astroturfing, or “fake news” (disinformation) helps keep a community healthy.
We’ve all been doing this for years… Ken Rockwell, Tony Northrop, Matt Granger, and that YouTube guy with the big ear piercings all come up in the community regularly, and elicit “hey buddy, you might want to look up some other opinions” when they’re quoted by a newbie.
I think that’s helpful, no?
There are plenty of recognizable names that should be taken with a large grain of salt; unfortunately, it isn’t always obvious to newcomers (or even old hats sometimes) who those people are.
He knew exactly what he was doing. He knows full well that the X100VI is an excellent camera by anyone’s measure, but that saying so won’t generate clicks and views. Shameful.
I think he was hoping to maximize clicks (ad revenue) by taking an extreme and controversial (to put it mildly) angle.
I can’t agree more with you Ritchie and your present article!
(And waiting for my X100VI…)
Thanks so much!
Oh, that guy.
A lot of photography articles pop into my news feed, and when I find a notable one I tend to check the by-line. I’ve noticed frequently that when the needle on the “Usefulness Dial” falls all the way down to “Was This Written by AI?”, it’s an article from Phoblographer by Chris Gampat.
Phoblographer’s formula seems to be “say something enticing, and fill the page with noise and affiliate links”. I submit his most recent example, on how to make photos that look like they’re coming from 6×7 film:
https://www.thephoblographer.com/2024/02/16/the-simple-way-to-get-the-magic-the-pentax-67-make/
Now, by the title you might have expected some kind of creative use of tilt/shift, or some new processing app. But I’ll summarize the article to save you the click:
* Use a portrait focal length
* Use a camera that supports ‘real time LUTs’. Valid choices are Canon or Panasonic. (I hope you didn’t just bite through your tongue, Ritchie!)
* Shoot wide open
* Get close
* Center your subject
So, there you have it. If you want your FF camera to look like it quadrupled in sensor size, jam a portrait lens in someone’s face and don’t kill yourself trying to frame the photo. And it would help if you used a camera famous for its film simulations…. like Canon.
It goes on and on, but I suggest you don’t dig deeper, like I did!
🤣
Got to shoot Canon to get those film simulation looks!
🤣 🤣
Thanks for providing the Cliff Notes so that I didn’t have to click the article…..
I thought it was just me. I was scratching my head reading the VI’s review, so I poked around looking for more of his articles. I was equally disappointed. Check the dates on the submitted articles.
I have long suspected that much of what is written there is done by AI. So many weird repetitions, mistakes, sentences that go on forever without meaning, must be AI. Blocked them from my news feed, nothing of value is written on that site these days.
I’ve had a lot of comments that suspect much of it is indeed AI. I have no idea if it’s true (wouldn’t be surprised if it was), but it’s not a good look for them.
So. You haven’t touched the camera. Shot any pictures. Chris has. So, by default because the specs are the same it’s an unknown why. Same. Same.
I don’t understand your comment. I have a Fujifilm X100V, which is nearly identical, and the X-T5, which is internally identical. I also have a more intimate knowledge of Fujifilm cameras in general than probably almost anyone on Earth, including Chris. I’m not giving a review at this time, but I definitely feel plenty qualified to provide commentary on his poor commentary. What’s the problem?
I am an avid follower of Fuji X- Weekly but you are beginning to show toddler-tantrum in your recent articles too. Perhaps, you were overlooked by Fujifilm and didn’t get a production copy of the camera.
I have followed and read many first hands-on reviews of the X100 VI. Some are balanced while others you can discerned a biased take. But at the end of the day, the readers form their own opinion.
I have, and I am trading in my X-T5 for the X100VI to complement my X-H2. I opined the X-100VI for all intent and purpose is an X-T5 with a fixed lens albeit with the compactness to boot. A great daily carry around.
Anyways, keep up with the excellent work! All the best.
Ouch!
I don’t anticipate getting gear from Fujifilm (and that’s ok) for a couple reasons:
– Fujifilm doesn’t like that many Recipes have competing brand names (Kodak, Kodachrome, Portra). A few years ago I talked with someone at Fuji, and they freely admitted this. For this reason, they keep a distance. I can count the number of conversations I’ve had with someone at Fujifilm on one hand. I’d much rather have conversations with them than gear.
– I quote and link to Fujirumors and have had conversations with Patrick. Fujifilm HATES Fujirumors; they told me so in no uncertain terms. My association (as loose as it is) with Fujirumors makes Fujifilm a bit standoffish towards me.
Thankfully, I can afford to buy a new camera once every year or two. I don’t need any new cameras, but for the sake of Recipes, it’s great to have all of the film sims available to me. Since the X-T5 will eventually get Reala Ace, I debated canceling my X100VI order… I had the mouse over the cancel button more than once. My gut (or is it my G.A.S.? 🤣) says to keep it, though, so that’s what I’m doing.
I think you are right, the X100VI will be a great daily carry camera.
I disagree, tkphotosz. Ritchie’s posts have been much what many of us have been thinking about design priorities and exasperation about the Internet losing its mind over the VI. I don’t see that as whining. We’re all just pining for our favorite camera to have been made just slightly more perfect.
(IMHO, they made the perfect changes, and the only improvements left to make to this concept are the standard smaller/lighter/cheaper desires.)
I don’t know why any of us would be disappointed to not get a VI. We know exactly what it is: an XT5 sensor and IBIS jammed into a V. There’s no surprise here, no need to pre-handle the camera to learn about it. Certainly no need for a review.
Sadly, the first review I read about the X100VI was the one from Chris Gampat. I’ve enjoyed the Phoblographer in the past but his review of the X100VI made me wonder what the hell he was smoking. I use the XT5 and the X100V so I know what those cameras are capable of producing. All in all the review sounded bitter and like a petulant teenager.
I am third on the list of my local camera store in Dallas. The Phoblographer is now last on my list for news and reviews of anything related to photography.
Yeah, glad that you didn’t listen! I bet you will absolutely love the camera. You will probably get yours before I get mine, too. 😀
Couldn’t agree more. His whole “review” sounded like a child’s tantrum and made absolutely ZERO sense to me. All he did with his venomous BS was cement him and the phoblographer website as irrelevant and dishonest from this moment forth. (Faux-blographer: god I loved that one!) Anyhow, your response post is both welcomed and warranted, something needed to be said about his pouty and ridiculous rant about this very exciting update to an already fantastic camera. I’ve had a V for almost four years and pre-ordered the VI at exactly 3 minutes past pre-orders opening on BH and I can’t wait to get more utility out of the digital ‘zoom’ (I also have the WCL and TCL and love and use both often) and of course hand held shots as slow as 1 second (with hopefully a 25-50% or better keeper rate). Keep up the excellent, excellent work and thanks again, brother, for sharing your clear and well written thoughts here. I am going to immediately upgrade to the subscription level for your app just based on this brilliant response post.
Thanks!
The main improvements over the “nearly perfect” X100V is that it has some new film sims and the Digital Teleconverter is more useful, plus IBIS if you should need it. I appreciate all of your kindness!
Couldn’t agree more. Faux-blographer… brilliant! Going to subscribe to your app immediately after this on-point post. Thank you brother and keep up the great, and honest, work!
Thanks!
Sorry for the double post, I thought my first post didn’t get submitted correctly so I rewrote something more brief in the interest of expediency – feel free to take this second redundant one down if you wish. Thanks Ritchie 🙏🏼
Something has been going on at that site lately. Many of the articles are contradictory, lacking thought, and the headlines are something you’d expect from Fstoppers, not a once-respected photography blog.
Well said Ritchie.
Thanks! I read some other comments that suggest that they’re using a lot of AI-written content. Perhaps that’s the problem? Definitely not a good look for them, though.
The X100v is a tough act to follow or big shoes to fill. There will be always someone not happy for whatever reason. LOL
I’m happy with my X100V, XT-5 and a XE-4. I feel honored & privileged to have one of each.
(for work & play). I love all three for different reasons. I really don’t need a 100VI and considering the 2024 price the money could go towards a new lens or two. 🙂
That’s a great series of cameras! Those are my favorite and most three used.
Go read his post on instagram. The site is barely making it money wise and he has been outcasted and is bitter. He is having a lot of personal issues too it looks like. I think he is a difficult person that isn’t making it easy on himself and the difficult position he is in financially. So it’s click bait at this point. Gotta keep the lights on and I mean also look at the information about him on the article. It reads like a resume.
The fact he said just buy an M6 like all other x100 users and skip the x1006 is so stupid too.
I had no ideas about his personal issues. It does seem like it’s more about clicks than quality content. In that case, I may have done just what he hoped someone would do.
Hmmm. Since Mr. Gambat had a short-term hands-on experience with the VI, let’s give him some benefit of our doubts. Let’s wait and see what’s he’s talking about. Besides his disappointment of Fujifilm not releasing an XPro4 anytime soon, it could be about failed expectations particularly on the VI’s AF performance. Sure, we’ll try to justify that the X100 series were made for us to shoot slow and easy. For me though, why not make it something preferential as in “even though its AF has drastically improved akin to maybe an XH2s, I’d still shoot the VI slow.” Perhaps Mr. Gambat didn’t consider how smart (maybe) Fujifilm is on taking advantage of the X100v’s popularity by retaining some of its old components which manifests the previous flaws from the V on his experience with the VI such that for him, it’s kind of a rip-off because for him it kind of cripples the VI (like his claim that the 23mm f/2.0 mark II doesn’t resolve efficiently as it was supposedly made for the XTrans4/Processor sensor).
To try to find a similar comparison, I’ve owned a GoPro10. And I’m aware of the updates on the GoPro12. When the Insta360 Ace Pro was released I was floored by its low light capabilities from an action cam where every other device under the category really had very bad low light footages. YET, many had given, may I call, near scathing reviews on the Ace Pro not having 10-bit video, a flip-up screen that would surely break when used in extreme circumstances, a lens guard that’s fixed, etc. By the time I read the bad reviews I already had the Ace Pro for weeks and it’s simply the best for my needs compared to the GoPro10 where it often freezes and render low light footages very unusable without lighting accessories and a gimbal.
If Mr. Gambat’s take on the VI is proven to be true, then maybe it would help many to save their investment by considering some other camera or be glad that they kept their V’s instead until the VII (or X100N, etc.) rolls out.
The AF is the same on the “nearly perfect” X100V, except for some algorithm and processing improvements. He was either dishonest in his review of the X100V, or in his review of the X100VI. Either way, it shows that he’s not trustworthy, at least when it comes to Fujifilm X-series. You cannot give the X100V five-stars and the near identical X100VI one-star and call yourself credible—it’s just not possible. Anyway, there will be a tsunami of evidence in just a couple of days that will prove one way or the other, and I’m feeling pretty confident which way it will go.
This is an excellent comprehensive review of the VI (in its pre-production state): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf9h0OghcVg
So far, I think all’s well. One thing I noticed that may irk some street photographers is shooting at f/8 where from 17:39, Pal2Tech compares images from f/2 to f/16. I read from two commenters somewhere that the VI couldn’t possibly resolve the 40mpx sensor using the old 23mm f/2.0ii. I told myself that’s impossible. But I was surprised that they were right. I’m not a street photographer but I hope this wouldn’t freak them out as they could adjust the aperture by one stop I suppose.
I’m not a pixel peeper really. For me, it makes no difference because the way I shoot doesn’t require me to have ultra-sharp contrasty images. I think Phoblographer’s rating ought to be around 2.5 to 3 for that matter as well as the rest of his grumblings over the VI. Still, we’ll have to see what other “mediocre to negative” reviewers would say and rate. Maybe, Chris Gampat’s just so ingrained into photography and Fujifilm (commends the XPro3 highly), failed expectations just totally freaked him out.
I mean when Coldplay kind of went, “poppish,” as much as I didn’t freak out, it made me stop anticipating their future releases no matter how ultra popular they were. Maybe that’s the closest how Chris Gampat thought about the VI I suppose.
Forget about Phoblographer, Ritchie. It won’t affect majority of the user’s take on the VI. Just continue bringing in those film simulation sauces you’re always wonderful at.
As for me, I’m still thinking that the VI’s too out of my $$$$. So I’ll be taking a look at Fujirumor’s purported mid-year release—An X-Txx camera: https://www.fujirumors.com/these-are-the-three-cameras-fujifilm-will-launch-in-the-first-half-of-2024/
Pal2Tech is definitely one of the more reliable sources out there. Very comprehensive review.
Regarding resolving 40mp or not, I think photographers in general like to make mountains out of pebbles and focus (pun intended) on things that don’t matter while ignoring the things that matter most. Whether it does or doesn’t fully resolve 40mp is such an insignificant thing. I freely use lenses on my X-T5 that supposedly don’t fully resolve 40mp and don’t think twice about it or notice any IQ issues with doing so.
Coldplay’s first two albums were definitely their best, by far. I guess X&Y was ok, but nothing compares to Parachutes and A Rush of Blood to the Head.
A friend of mine commented once after a school auctioneer did something manipulative and underhanded: “Trust is a funny thing. If you ever do something to lose it t, it can take a really like no time to win it back.”
It sounds like a generational pout, demanding more influence in what Fuji is doing and throwing a tantrum when his demands were not met.
But whatever… Not going to follow the link, I don’t have to read it to know it lack integrity and credibility. If this camera deserved 1* then the preproduction reviews I’ve seen from reliable sources would have noticed something catastrophically wrong with it.
Anyway… Still milling it over. It’s like you said, I already have one or two good cameras, and also have finite resources.
Thanks for your good work and great articles. I don’t even own a Fujifilm camera… Yet!
Thanks! I hope that you do get a Fujifilm camera at some point, as I’m sure you will love it. 😀
Thanks! I read that review and was flabbergasted. Did not know he had lauded the x100v. End of my reading the Pho[faux]blographer.
My x100M6 was ordered hours after release. I was travelling, on Kauai, and lost some hours waiting to get usable Internet. I travelled with my x100v and my Sony A7Rv (w/ the 24-70 GM ii, 70-200 Macro & TC14). I used the x100v extensively. Here’s an example:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/QY8gug5UuTJgTq8P9
I shoot RAW and process in LrC to my taste. Never touch the film simulations. I had enough of color film character when my choices were Kodachrome, Ektachrome, and the horrible yellowing Anscochrome. But I was using a Leica III-f with a screw mount collapsible 50mm f2 Summicron. The x100 series brings me back to that gem.
Thanks for sharing the beautiful picture!
I stopped reading that a year ago, after an absolute tragedy of an article was published. Thanks for confirming.
I have never been an avid reader, but just very occasional; however, I will not ever go back, personally. I appreciate the comment!
I read the article a couple of days ago and couldn’t understand what his problem was! Glad I’m not alone in that, so thanks Ritchie.
I have an XT5, XS20 and X100V and whilst the X100VI would complement them nicely, I can’t justify the price (I’m retired, so no pay! 😂)
I’ll continue to enjoy the V for the great camera that it is, especially when used in conjunction with your film sims. 😊 🙏🏻
The X100V is such a great camera, as are your others. Definitely continue to enjoy them. 😀
The review you mention certainly didn’t seem dispassionate; somebody seems to be getting out of bed the wrong side at the moment. I doubt that the lone one star review will have much impact. I’ve never even seen TikTok but I do trust the reviews by the few professionals I know who have had a test copy of the X100VI to try out and they are extremely encouraging. Meanwhile thanks for all you do on Fuji X Weekly. That photo of Sentinel and Merced taken with the Vintage Color simulation is amazing: it could be a painting — and that’s meant as a compliment!
Thanks so much for your kindness! It’s much appreciated! 😀
Shouldn’t care about what Phoblographer writes. That website used to be decent with real people behind it, now everything written there falls into 3 categories:
– paid advertisement masquarading as articles
– negative reviews (when site owner is not bribed to write positive things)
– AI crap – found so many posts obviously written by AI full of weird repetitions, sentences going on forever saying nothing, bad references (ie writing a review of the Zf but referring to the camera as the Zf C or Z6 in the same article).
The times that they had good content is long gone, and paying any kind of attention to phoblographer is such a waste. I blocked their posts on FB and from my news reel as well cause they do not produce anything of value.
Yeah, it seems like they’re not doing real well anymore. Too bad, but it is their own doing.
I’ve long quietly held the opinion that the guy running that side was a snooty supercilious arrogant (insert final insult here) and I’m not remotely surprised to read he’s published a one star review of a camera he previously raved about. Well done for speaking up. the Fauxblographer only ever turned up in my Flipboard feed and the next time it does it’ll be getting muted. They’re utterly useless if this is how they handle disappointment of some kind (which is the only explanation for his pettiness) then they’re worthless as a source of opinions.
I’ve never been an avid reader, but have occasionally clicked on one of their articles when it has come up in my feed. Won’t be doing that anymore….
Reminds me of way back in the day when Ken Rockwell’s review of the X-Pro2 came out.. The X-Pro1 had been biblical… The X-Pro2 was meh. Go figure..
Anyway, there’s way too much fuss made of cameras, launches and reviews, and like nearly everything in the internet photography world, doesn’t focus on the art, but on the tech.
I’ll now go and read this Fauxblographer review 😏…
Now having read it.. I see Chris is ‘legally blind’… I’m bowing out of this discussion.
He should try my Film Simulation Recipes. It’s been really helpful to a number of color blind and legally blind photographers.
I’ve met Ken and he’s a super nice guy, but I do think you’ve got to take his writings with a large grain of salt. I personally prefer to focus more on the art over the technical junk… any camera is more than technically good enough as long as the photographer is, too.
I left quite a long and scathing comment on the review. Surprised he didn’t take it down, but it got a decent amount of support.
But interesting were also the comments of people applauding Chris for telling it how it is and for being honest. But whenever a new model comes out there are always those with the knives out – usually from those using other brands engaging in fanboy tribalism or from those with earlier models enjoying some bias confirmation (exactly as there was with the new sensor in the x-t5).
In his initial review he even wished for IBIS, FFS.
The whole thing reeks of elitism and camera snobbery. It’s become very popular, so he couldn’t possibly be seen using or supporting what the plebs are buying.
For what it’s worth I think his V review swung the other way. It was fairly well balanced, and raised issues that I think were fair having had the V a couple of years. But enough small things to improve on the conclusion of 5* and “nearly perfect camera” seemed too effusive.
An absolute hatchet job, and so obviously so that luckily I doubt anyone could possibly take him as a serious photographer let along photographer blogger.
At least with all things Fuji he has shown again and again over the last couple of years that he just doesn’t get the cameras, who they are for and their strengths and weaknesses. He hates the X-t5 also and with regular click bait lists of best Fuji camera for X purpose he’ll frequently ignore it. Choose the x-h2 for street for its fantastic image quality and colours on the new sensor… More compact and subtle x-t5, what’s that?
He seems to make a lot of affiliate income by cheerleading for Tamron. Best lenses for your Fuji camera… oh, they are all Tamron zooms. Please don’t go down that route!
I definitely think he’s getting paid by a few certain companies. He has to be, because it doesn’t make any sense otherwise.
Much Ado about Nothing (C)
Ritchie is right but… Need we say a word or two about?
In the end, absolutely none of this matters, you are right.
I often wonder why someone who could be considered an influencer would write a review of a product that diametrically refutes a previous review of a similar product. I always suspect an ulterior motive. In this case, I think he is hoping to keep people from buying the VI. Perhaps he had to wait a long time to buy the V because of market saturation and he now sees the same thing happening with the VI. As opinions go, I could be very wrong. That is the nature of opinions, you know. I have never visited his site and I have no idea who this writer is. So, this is just a comment shot out of the dark.
For the record, I would never buy a camera like the X100 because I dislike cameras that have a fixed lens. I would rather buy, and did, an XE4 where I could experiment with different focal lengths. Fujifilm makes some great small prime lenses that I love to use. Small form factor and able to pack in a small messenger bag with several other lenses.
The X-E4 is a great little camera! Especially excellent when paired with the 27mm f/2.8.
I agree with your first and the biggest complain. Which is also mine.
– We didn’t get a camera from Fujifilm! But is their loss! I know you think that you deserve it more and I do not contest that 😀 .
On another note, maybe the problem is that you do not contest their camera, you are already freely enrolled on their bandwagon. The Japanese are “practical” (I think that is how a thief is called these days), if they can take advantage for free, they will do it. Honor? What is that? Overpower them and they will respect you. I know them well (not you, not the other one, they are the main jerks here – but it cannot be helped).
I don’t know if I deserve it, but certainly Omar Gonzales should have gotten one, but I’m pretty sure that he didn’t. Fujifilm should have given him one instead. I can think of a half-dozen people off the top of my head (not myself) who didn’t get a copy but probably should have been offered one.
Old guy here. I’ve had an X100S for 10 years and my big Canon rig has stayed in its bag most of the time since. What I find amusing about the constant desire for more pixels, lower speeds, faster AF etc. with the X100 series is that these days 99.9% of photographers don’t make prints. Who cares about a 40 mp sensor when the image just gets displayed on a screen? As for this reviewer taking exception to another reviewer’s take without having tried the camera himself, I ask: Isn’t there something better to spend your time writing about?
I’m not a big fan of more megapixels. I’ve said many times that 40mp is excessive for most people and purposes. In the case of the X100VI, it makes sense in that the Digital Teleconverter (I don’t think that’s a feature on the X100S) is more useful. Otherwise, it’s unnecessary.
This isn’t a review, and I don’t write a lot of reviews personally (for example, I’ve had the X-T5 for like 18 months, and have never written a review about it). I do write about a lot of things (mostly camera settings), what else should I have written about instead?
OMG – THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH for calling out that hack. Seriously. I have never read anything so silly in my life, and I’ve been waiting on someone, not me, to call him on it.
All that site is interested in is selling things – not fair and objective reviews. Or any insight whatsoever.
This specific article was one of the worst – but his track record is not good.
It was pretty bad. Hopefully people see through the utter nonsense.
I have to be honest, I find the x100VI to be a pointless upgrade on an already perfect camera. Fujifilm used to be the company that takes risks, now they seem to make decisions based purely on financials.
I would love to see an x100 with a new focal length, maybe even combining the x100 line with the x30 line. Digicams are huge right now and a modern Fuji digicam that is adorable will be so unique.
I wouldn’t say that the XI deserves a 1*, but I would say I completely understand some people being really disappointed with it. That said there’s nothing I hate more than blogs who can only give 1 or 5 stars, nothing in between love and hate. It makes it really obvious that an article is clickbait imo
What’s to be disappointed about? It’s essentially the same thing as the “already perfect” X100V, except with some upgrades and improvements. If you have the V, there’s probably not a big reason to upgrade, but there usually isn’t from one generation to the next. The adage is to skip one generation, so those coming from older models will likely see it as a significant update; however, I suspect that most buying the X100VI aren’t upgrading, but are purchasing their first. In that sense, this is an even more perfect camera than the X100V is.
I presently have the x100v and have owned since they were first on the market for sale. I love the camera and it has become my camera of choice. Previously I had the x100f that my grandson has used since I upgraded to the v. The x100f has seen much of this country as well as England, Scotland and now in Japan where he stationed as a Naval officer.
I also have the xt2 that I have used for vacations, weddings, events, travel and family photos. I have several Fuji lenses which work flawlessly with the camera. I have thought about upgrading but since I am happy with the cameras results, why change.
I have used the X 100 V for travel around the country as well as overseas and find it to be my camera choice when traveling. I look forward to seeing more articles on the new x100VI, but again as long as I am happy with the results of the x100v why change…. Time will tell. I agree with the writers who have said the x100v is almost the perfect camera.
I would say, unless you just have to have the new film sims, 40mp, or IBIS, there’s no reason to upgrade from the X100V.
Great comments…but what I liked most is this (that we find at the very end): “There are plenty of ways to find renewed enjoyment from our old gear, such as trying different Film Simulation Recipes, using vintage lenses, or simply taking it on adventures. Experiences are often better investments than new gear”….
He wrote a similar article just the other day titled “7 REASONS TO NOT UPGRADE TO THE FUJIFILM X100VI” where he proceeded to list out two valid complaints and then went on a rant about how the X100VI is for content creator wannabees.
To add insult to injury his final reason was that the Leica M6 is a better alternative, heavily implying that the X100VI is a toy and the Leica is a camera for “real photographers”. To be clear, what he’s saying here is that you’re basically not a real photographer unless you sink $5k into camera equipment. Absolutely baffling conclusion.
I read that, too, and thought it was equally as ridiculous. The thing to note is that the affiliate commission from the Leica is much more than the Fujifilm. I noticed that the more expensive the gear, the more he’s pushing it right now. Gotta earn that commission to pay those employees…..
Thanks so much! I appreciate your kindness!
Ritchie, you seem to need attention also. F Gambpet. Why even care and why feel the need to have this kind of reaction!
Many could call you out as using this article and click bait title to get more clicks and grow more.
Just sayin man, let it go. You should have let it go immediately-says a lot about you you are and what you need to do to grow as a human being.
How old are you dude?
“Legally blind” does not equate to “blind”. It’s a threshold level of visual impairment, not “no eyes”.
It’s also not really relevant.
Well, if this was my attempt at getting attention, I chose an unobvious path. Film Simulation Recipes are, by far, the articles that receive the most views. Articles that discuss Film Simulation Recipes are next up. Articles like this one don’t typically get all that many views. Also, I didn’t promote it in any way (share links on social media, for example).
I would say refer to back to the first two paragraphs of my article….
Also, almost all of your comments across the entire internet are mean or aggressive or angry or crude. Seems like a case of pointing a finger, but having three point right back at you. Just sayin man, says a lot about you, who you are, and what you need to do to grow as a human being.
Just read that scathing review and while I agree that everyone is entitled to the own opinion, this one is quite baffling.
If Chris is confused by the seemingly “small” changes in the new X100VI (uh, new sensor and IBIS do not seem small to me, but okay), he hasn’t been paying attention to the X100 series these past 13 years. I myself had the original x100 and all of the early models (x100, x100s and x100t) look almost identical and the changes were highly incremental. It was only until the F and V did big upgrades in sensor and design come about and even then, the design had a very recognizable look and identity, and uniquely retro experience. I shot that original x100 for almost 10 years until the shutter stopped and it was the slowest, most frustrating, magically quirky and wonderful camera I’ve ever owned.
That was/is the point of this series. It prioritizes — with its impractical OVF, ergonomics and non-PSAM dials— the user experience and enjoyment over specs. That’s it. This is also why the X100 series is something like the heart of Fuji’s brand, even before all this TikTok hype.
I agree with all of that. I’ve never shot with the OG X100, but I’ve heard that it is a magical quirky camera that’s both frustrating and wonderful. It is both the heart and soul of Fujifilm.
I stopped going to his site after his review of the Fujifilm X-S10. I felt like it seemed so difficult for him to imagine use cases outside of his own. I mean shouldn’t reviewers at the very least TRY to be as unbiased or impartial as they can and look at a product from the perspective of its target market or potential users? Maybe he gets more traffic from negative publicity?
I think he’s likely found that negative publicity is good for ad revenue. High-end gear is best for affiliate revenue (his reviews of expensive gear seems to be positive).
Out of principle if it has a sensational headliner, I neither open the article, nor watch the YouTube video. I’m tired of being told nonsense by people I neither know, nor have any respect for. Instead I like to see examples of what people have achieved, how they used their camera and who are also willing to demonstrate their skills.
I read books and follow inspirational artists, irrespective of their style or camera brand they use, inspiration is such a positive motivation to get “out and shoot”.
Over the last 46 years I have owned many cameras including every X100 and feel comfortable to expect the same user experience with the VI as I had with the V .. except with IBIS, 40mp and some other improvements.
I’m glad it has the same battery, as I have a handful of them, and I also have the weather kit from my V, so happy one of those is not included.
I sold my V just 6 weeks ago, and I’ve been using my iPhone as a stop gap. Whilst the results are quite impressive, the whole user experience is not the same. Using a phone changed my approach, composition and attitude.
So I am eagerly awaiting delivery of a shiny new silver VI.
Let me recommend Kyle McDougall’s “An American Mile” book. It was highly inspirational for me, personally.
Everyone is talking about the writing and point of view, and fair enough, but no one has mentioned how he gaffer taped a filter onto the lens, WTF was that!! Funniest thing ever….
I guess buying an adapter kit and correct-sized filter is too much? If you go the third-party route, you can get it for for less than $15 total, and (depending where you live) Amazon will deliver next day or maybe even same day. Surprised he didn’t already have it laying around from the X100V….
Yeah, I was scratching my head during the whole article. And that closing remark about the Leica? Yes, I do aspire to own one – but with a lens/camera set up running about 7x the cost of an X100??? That just ain’t realistic.
I sold my x100T to purchase an XH-1 a few years ago. I miss it. But I still have my old XPro + 28mm pancake. Not the same as an X100, but not bad. Maybe if the distribution line doesn’t fail like it did for the V I’ll try to get the new model.
The Leica model pays much more in affiliate revenue, so if you convince some people to buy that instead, you’re more profitable. I think that’s why.
Fujifilm is making double the VI’s as they did the V’s, so hopefully once the initial hype dies down, it will be a bit easier to get.
I just don’t get what all the hype is over the X100VI. It’s a truly compromised camera, as it has only 1 fixed lens. Sure it is small–so is my X3. Yet, imho, the X3 can run circles around the X100VI, w/the exception of IBIS. I had one of the 1st releases of the original X100 and I returned it as it was too restrictive and compromised. Currently, I shoot w/the X3 as well as a Panasonic Lumix S5IIx. They are both brilliant!
If someone placed a Fujifilm X-T3 and X100V in front of me, I’m picking the X100V, no question about it. That’s just what I like, each person has their own preferences. Different strokes for different folks. What’s limiting for one person is freeing for another. What’s “compromised” for one is perfect for another. We’re all different.
hmmm… the Phoblographer….
I stopped subscribing to that blog when he declared the DSLR was dead and stated that he would never review another DSLR and anyone that was considering owning one was not meant to read his blog….
my commentary was deleted and I was dropped from his subscribing list.. I also deleted my ‘fav’ link to his blog….
thank you for calling his review out for being essentially click-bait…
I think it was beyond even click-bait… it was crazy dishonest and plain wrong, even with all the benefits of the doubt that can be given.
Isn’t Chris legally blind?
Somebody said that, I have no idea. I don’t know him. If so, he should try my Film Simulation Recipes, as many color-blind and legally-bind folks have found it helpful to their photography.
My take on the review is that it is legitimate in that Fuji has had five years to improve the AF performance, battery life, weather sealing, touch screen and menu system.
That might be sour grapes to dedicated Fuji fanboys, but those are valid points, regardless of what the reviewer liked about the model V. Technology is competitive and Fuji is not taking a leading position for a 2024 camera manufacturer. The VI is a mild improvement over the V, but it doesn’t seem very competitive in the market relative to technology.
The X100V came out four years ago, not five.
All of the X100-series successors, since the X100S, have been mild updates from the predecessor. Probably the biggest change was the X100F (from the X100T). I’m not sure what kind of expectations one has, but they need to stay realistic. Fujifilm wasn’t going to do an overhaul. The X100VII won’t be all that much different than the X100VI. The X100VIII won’t be that much different than the X100VII. That’s just the way it is.
Your opinion is that it isn’t very competitive, yet it is the most in-demand camera of all time. No other model ever has had as many preorders at launch as the X100VI. Not just any other Fuji camera, but any camera from any brand ever. In fact, Sonyalpharumors claims that the X100VI had 50 times more preorders within 24 hours than the preorders from the Sony A7cII and Sony A7cR combined. 50 times! Yet people (not necessarily you, but others) will say that Fujifilm should be more like Sony.
Compared to what?
Only if you really use the camera will you appreciate what has been done.
What premium, compact, fixed-lens camera(s) do you rate more highly than the Vi, and why?
If you ordered it from B&H you could be in for a long wait. I had a confirmed order for the black one exactly 3 minutes after the pre-orders began; 12:03 PM CST USA. I spoke with a salesperson at B&H yesterday because I was sort of surprised given how quickly I placed the order it wasn’t going to ship. I was told it would take approximately 6 months to get to my order based on the number of units they expect to receive in the future and where I was in the queue. I called Adorama just to see what they would say. The salesperson there told me they were 1000+ short on the black model and 486 short on the silver. He said if I ordered from them that day it would be 6-9 months before they would be able to fulfill it. I ended up cancelling my pre-order with B&H. I am not sure I would be as excited about the camera after waiting 6 months to receive it. I sold my V last week for $1300. I took literally 5 minutes for it to sell. I guess I should have listed it for more. I have owned every prior version of the X100. In fact I still have my original I got in 2010. I guess I will give it a pass this time. Fuji really seems to have problems with anticipating demand. I’m not sure going forward I would buy any other Fuji equipment. I sold my X Pro 3 yesterday. I really wanted a new camera so I ordered a Nikon Zf with the 40mm lens. It’s arriving today. I made enough off the V and X Pro 3 to get the Zf and put some money in my pocket. The Zf should be familiar. I am 63 and used Nikon film cameras for decades. Best of luck to Fuji going forward. I was a loyal customer for 14 years. I am very happy they are doing well. Hopefully they will sort out their supply problems in the future.
The Phoblogger is an idiot. I read that review initially slack jawed and then laughing hilariously.
That’s crazy. I’m glad B&H was open with you… they wouldn’t tell me much at all.
I think the poor guy at B&H was getting tired of the same question. I wouldn’t have wanted to hear that question over and over again all day. He was pretty short with me. The Adorama guy talked my ears off. So what do I think? I think it probably depends on where you are in the queue and whether you ordered black or silver. My gut feeling is the B&H person was being overly dramatic but I think it would have been longer than 3 months for me. I don’t think the next shipments they are getting (again inferring from Adorama) are going to be as large the initial one. If so that will lead to further delays. Keep in mind they haven’t even opened up orders for Japan yet. When they do, that will probably cut back the number of units they can ship to for example the US. The whole thing was kind of big bummer after I got worked up about it. That’s on me I suppose. That said, when I thought about it I my gut feeling was I would be somewhat disappointed with the camera if I had to wait that long no matter how good it is. The Zf arrived an hour ago. I am charging the battery now. It seems like a very nice camera.
As an aside a friend of mine who shoots Fuji told me about this site. She really likes it a lot. I have to agree it’s excellent. She was also told her VI wouldn’t ship for awhile. Her order was later than mine. Best of luck to you on the camera. Maybe I will think about getting one next year if I live that long and the Nikon doesn’t work out. However, if my X-T5 I listed on Ebay sells I am probably stuck with Nikon going forward. Oh well. It’s been a fun 14 years with Fuji.
Yeah, I heard that X100VI preorders in China alone exceeds the total amount Fuji plans to manufacture over the coming two years. They really need to figure out how to make more copies, double or even triple the current production. But that can’t be easy, and maybe impossible.
I don’t think Fujifilm are capable of making a 1 star product. Whilst I won’t be purchasing the Vi (I have the V and love it), and I do question the battery decision, there can be no doubt it will be an exceptional camera. It will be top quality and will work pretty flawlessly within the sphere of photography it’s been designed for. Those buying it will have a great experience with it.
Exactly! If it fell apart or malfunctioned, then maybe 1-star would be warranted. I’m sure there are legitimate complaints that can be made (no camera is perfect), but those who buy it will love it, I’m pretty certain.
Don’t get why you’d order the X100VI if you have an XT5 and X100V. There is literally so little change in the camera and it looks identical to the predecessor.
Where has the innovation gone? this iteration is like iPhone 14 to iPhone 15..
There’s not usually a big update to the X100-series. Probably the most extensive was the X100F over the X100T.
I ordered the X100VI specifically for Reala Ace.
For my style, the IBIS is a big update, and worth the change. Which is why I have an open order for one. The 40 mp and new processing engine is really just bringing it in line with the current Fuji level.
The lack of stabilisation in the V got me looking at the Q3, leaf shutter, wonderful lens, but its size, no optical view finder, weight, file size and lack of ND filter put me off.
To be honest to all the non X100 fanboys out there I’d like some competition, but there really isn’t anything.
So why can’t there be some real competition to the X100, why can’t the others innovate and come up with something?
I have to think that the massive success of the X100VI has other companies re-thinking some things. Time will tell if anything comes of it or not.
I agree that I was taken aback by the review and found it unreasonably harsh. I give it a small amount of credit, though, as a counterbalance to the overly praiseful fanboy reviews.
At the end of the day I think there are two legitimate potential complaints about the VI (as opposed to the V): that it is not enough of an upgrade and that the higher megapixel count has a negative impact of the IQ. The first complaint is clearly not sufficient for a one-star review, and while the second is more serious it is also debatable at best. The hyperbole of the review does make it read like a temper tantrum.
Not enough of an upgrade? The 40mp sensor, IBIS, and the improvements to auto focus detect, are large step changes for the X100 series form factor. The other two (obvious?) upgrades that could have been made are; a second card slot or some internal memory, and the larger battery. But had those been made, and the price increased commensurately, what would be the range differentiation between the X100 series and the XT series? It would be an XT5 in an X100 body with a fixed lens.
What else would you have liked Fujifilm to upgrade? (Personally, had they developed a monochrome variant of the X100V I’d have sold a kidney to get it).
I would love a monochrome-only version, would be an instant buy from me.
I have an X-T5, and I can assure you that there is not a negative impact on IQ from the 40mp sensor. My complaint about the 40mp sensor is that it is unnecessary for most, and takes up more space on the SD Card/phone/computer/storage than the 26mp, which is already more resolution than the majority of people really need. But IQ? There is not a very big difference at all between the two sensors. Anyone saying the IQ is “worse” or especially significantly or even noticeably “worse” is smoking something, for sure, or has not actually done any real comparisons and is just assuming that it “must be” because it has more resolution.
Ritchie, it’s refreshing and encouraging that you took the time to respond to that ridiculous review. The X100VI is an amazing camera. I now have several Fujifilm cameras and I’m looking seriously in selling off at least one for the X100VI. It’s a smart camera. I can’t fathom not liking it, I think so often we see people just say anything in social media. I never look for perfection in anything. To do so just sets up disappointment and failure. Anyway, kudos to you sir, you did the right thing and to me that means a lot.
Yeah, I mean, it was just so blatantly dishonest (despite claims of being honest). It’s fine to have complaints… I’ve not been shy about my complaints on a given piece of gear, but this was well beyond complaining. It was straight-up deception, and I’m sure with the intent of getting clicks for add revenue. A little deception can be good for comedy, but you’ve got to come clean right away; otherwise, that’s not ok, either. I appreciate your kindness and encouragement!
I own and enjoy shooting with Fuji XT series. I also own canon system and olympus. I still think that the X100 series is an overrated camera, especially with the increase demand of the X100V because of the supply shortage + tiktok hype/influence and now the X100VI (which is overpriced, at least in Australian market). We are entitled to our own opinion…the X100 series is what I’d consider as a point and shoot camera. I have my phone to serve that purpose. I guess it’s hard to relate when you’re not a hardcore fanboy to a system or a particular model. I enjoyed shooting with other Fuji models where I can switch lenses when the need arises. Interesting article though.
I wouldn’t call it a point and shoot. On one hand it’s more capable than any X-T (think leaf shutter and built-in ND filter), but on the other hand it’s limited to one focal length. Limitations improve art, and so some people thrive on it. Certainly the X100 cameras aren’t for everyone, but they are far from a cellphone camera, so very different. While we’re talking about that, though, check out my RitchieCam App if you are on iPhone.
As the VI is coming out, I am actually intending to sell my V and buy a XT5 with the 18mm f/1.4. Any thoughts on that since you seem to own (or will own) all three? I’ve found that I haven’t really NEEDED the compactness I originally bought the X100 for.
I have never owned the 18mm f/1.4 personally, so I can’t tell you much about it. I’m sure it’s excellent. The X-T5 is a great camera. If you don’t need the compactness of the X100V (or leaf shutter, built-in ND-filter, etc), then I’m certain you will love the X-T5 instead. I have both the X100V and X-T5 right now in my camera bag that’s sitting right next to me. Both are excellent, so you won’t regret the X-T5, I’m pretty certain.
I’ve been used to the X100V and also X-Pro3 as well as the earlier X-Pros before the current one came out. I find the handling of all the above excellent so was a bit surprised yesterday that to me the handling of the X-T5 felt very different and somehow a bit fiddly and clumsier. Not saying you or other people would feel the same but probably best as always to try before you buy. You may love it of course but I eas surprised how different it felt.
For Tyler: look at Kevin Mullins’ site — British wedding & street photographer. He uses X100- series and has used 23/1.4 & 56/1.2 extensively for his work but more specifically for you he has the 18/1.4 and has reviewed it very favourably. Hope this helps.
I’ve heard that for the 40Mp sensor, there are only one or two Fujifilm lenses that deliver for that resolution. Is that right? Well, I would expect the lens of X100VI to be already redesigned…
There are, apparently, 20 that resolve the full 40mp sensor. The list is a bit old now, so I’m sure any that come out after will also resolve.
https://www.fujirumors.com/list-of-fujinon-xf-lenses-that-get-maximum-benefit-from-fujifilm-x-h2-and-x-t5-with-40-megapixel-resolution/
Even so, I use some lenses that don’t fully resolve 40mp on my X-T5, and there’s no practical difference in IQ. So I think it’s a bit overstated.
The lens on the ..100VI doesn’t take advantage of the 40MP sensor, so apart from IBIS there is no advantage over the ..100V. End of debate – game over! The ..100VI is a wonderful marketing gimmick designed to sell more cameras, and it appears it’s doing it quite successfully. I think your counterparts harsh criticism is well founded and is something you actually didn’t understand 🤔
Like I said in my reply to your other comment, whether the lens can fully resolve 40mp when wide open is such a minor thing to be concerned about, it’s making a mountain out of a pebble. There’s no real-world-use affect, if it is even true.
Regarding the faux-blographer, he was being over-the-top sensational for the sake of getting clicks in order to gain more ad revenue. His article is knee-deep in dishonesty, which is unacceptable and indefensible (unless you are joining him in that dishonesty). It’s perfectly fine to criticize, and I do a fair amount of it myself. It’s not ok to purposefully mislead people for the sake of getting more ad money because the website it struggling to stay afloat. That’s wrong, and there’s no excuse for it. If you want to cover yourself waist-deep in his excrement, that’s on you, but I won’t put up with it personally. Your comment reads a lot like a troll, and trolls aren’t allowed on my website.
I’ve not read all the comments, so my view might have been covered before. As I see it the X100VI has a resolution upgrade as well as IBIS. Great! But, the lens hasn’t been upgraded and I’ve seen evidence that the lens resolution really isn’t up to the sensor. If true, the sensor upgrade becomes useless. It’s nothing more than a marketing exercise. Not upgrading the lens represents a degree of laziness or just lack of intelligence on the part of Fuji. My comment here is about factual stuff; not just opinion. It can be verified by technical evaluation. There’s 2 more issues. The new sensor and IBIS draws more power so battery life is less – more factual stuff. Finally, the shutter button lacks a tactile pre-focus feel relative to other competing cameras. I think it was reasonable to criticize the VI for these facts despite the V having been brilliant – after all the lens likely has good resolution forits sensor. Having an X100V and an XT5 doesn’t give you the proper basis for forming an opinion about the X100VI. And I’d like to say that I’m a Fuji fan. I have an XH2 and a GFX 100S and a bunch of beautiful hi res Fuji lenses for both. They are stunning. I was interested in the X100VI given all the hype and all the advertising, but ‘no way’ having considered all the facts. Now if Fuji brings out a new PRO with the new sensor and IBIS, then that’s a whole new proposition. But I’d also love to see a new GFX50III.
I agree with your assessment that 40mp is mere marketing. For most people, 16mp is sufficient. For 99+% of photographers, 26mp is more than enough. It’s really only a tiny fraction of one percent that actually need more than that. However, because of ego more than anything, megapixels sell cameras. 100 megapixels is marketing. 61 megapixels is marketing. 50 megapixels is marketing. 40 megapixels is marketing. Almost nobody, unless they crop extremely deeply and/or print huge posters, needs that much resolution. A lot of people will tell you that they do, but the reality is that almost nobody who claims to need it actually does. I don’t. I’m sure you don’t, either (odds are you don’t, but maybe you are a rare exception).
I disagree with the rest.
Can the X100VI lens fully resolve 40mp? I have no idea. I have the camera in my hands; if it cannot, I can’t tell. I have seen a claim that wide-open it cannot, and maybe it can’t. So what? Does it make any real-world difference? No. At best it’s making a mountain out of a pebble. You’re not seeing the forest for the trees.
Fujifilm claims that the battery life has improved over the X100V. I don’t know if I believe that, but it’s definitely not worse. I had said a couple months ago, before the camera was announced, that it most certainly will have a worse battery life, but I was completely wrong. It doesn’t.
I have no idea what you’re talking about regarding half-pressing the shutter release button. It works the same on this camera as all other Fujifilm models, and really all models from all brands.
I have the X100VI and am loving it already. But, like all cameras, it’s not perfect and not for everyone.
The worst part of any camera ecosystem are the fanboys m4/3 and Fuji seem to be the worst . So here we find the cult of Fuji turning on Chris because his findings don’t match yours, but how dull the world would be without differences of opinions.
You don’t need to be a genius or have the camera to know a pancake lens (they are all compromised) is not the best fit for a densely packed sensor, and unless Fuji made recent improvements to autofocus that it will be slower than the competition.
I was set to sign up for the waiting list for this camera and joined the official site on Facebook to check out user images, the film simulations look nothing like and are worse than my collection of photos from old film point and shoots and just flat and lifeless. So the cameras claim to fame is it’s handy size and retro looks that’s a lot of coin for a fashion accessory.
So no surprise not for me at the moment, but I wish you all the best with your creative endeavours. Personally in a world of gushing reviews I find a different opinion refreshing so well done Chris.
There’s no excusing or defending Chris on this. He stepped in a pile of poop, and anyone defending it is doing the same. You cannot say one camera is five-star and nearly perfect, and the improved successor is one-star and trash. There’s zero credibility in that. It stinks, because he has poop on his shoe—and now you do, too. Best to wipe that off before it tracks throughout your whole house.