Mission San Xavier del Bac – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Kodak Vericolor VPS
Kodak introduced Vericolor color negative film in 1974. It was their professional emulsion for portrait, wedding, and studio photography, and was designed to work well with flashes. Vericolor was a predecessor of Portra, intended to produce pleasing skin tones. There were a handful of different versions produced in the 1970’s and 1980’s, and the line was discontinued in the late-1990’s with the introduction of Portra.
While this Film Simulation Recipe is called Kodak Vericolor VPS, which was an ISO 160 version released in 1979, I think it’s actually more similar to Vericolor II, released in 1977. I had a difficult time finding examples to model this after, and a couple of old photography magazines were my best source. This Recipe definitely has the right vibe for late-1970’s Vericolor, particularly printed pictures from the film. I found it to be quite versatile—excellent for sunny daylight, golden hour, overcast, natural light indoors, and even certain nighttime situations. This could definitely be the go-to Recipe for some of you, especially if you appreciate a late-1970’s or early ’80’s aesthetic.
Manitou & Pike’s Peak – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5 – Kodak Vericolor VPS
Because this Kodak Vericolor VPS Recipe uses the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, it is only compatible with fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, which (as of this writing) are the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. It’s also compatible with the latest GFX models: GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Film Simulation: Nostalgic Neg. Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Strong, Large Color Chrome Effect: Strong Color Chrome FX Blue: Strong White Balance: 4500K, +2 Red & -5 Blue Highlight: -1 Shadow: +2 Color: +3 Sharpness: -1 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: -2 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: +1/3 to +1 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Kodak Vericolor VPS Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5:
Pick Here – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Tree Ghost – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
North Pole – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Alleyway Photography – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Handheld Camera – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Fujifilm Photographer – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Mission – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Pikes Peak Inn – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Gas Tanks – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Suburban Home – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Yellow Bougainvillea Blossoms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Potted Leaves – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Cactus & Wall – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Sunlit Leaves – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Odadiuc – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Indoor Flag – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Superguard – Waddell, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Moon over Sedona – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
In-N-Out – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Neighborhood Fireworks – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Fujifilm X-E5 in black: B&H, Nuzira Fujifilm X-E5 in silver: B&H, Nuzira
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
A Kodak Moment – Antelope Island SP, UT – Fujifilm X-T20
Yesterday, the New York Times published a story entitled The Kodak Brand Gets a Second Life. In South Korea, there are over 120 Kodak Apparel stores that sell shirts, hats, sunglasses, handbags, luggage, and more with the Kodak logo on them. Kodak Apparel isn’t a part of Eastman Kodak, but a different company called Highlight Brands that simply licenses the name from Kodak. While Kodak Apparel is currently huge in South Korea, it hasn’t quite caught on worldwide… yet.
The New York Times suggests that this is a part of an international trend that’s being dubbed newtro, a combination of new and retro. Newtro describes something that is brand-new but seems to be or nods to something that’s vintage. Many Fujifilm cameras, like the X-E5, X100VI, X-T5, X-T50, X-M5, and X half, fall into this category. The X-Pro would, too, if they were currently making one.
What’s old is cool again. While antiques and vintage things are “in” right now, so are things that just seem to be retro or pay homage to that. It shouldn’t be surprising that Kodak clothes are extremely trendy in South Korea. What is surprising is that companies like Kodak and Fujifilm aren’t doing more to capitalize on the newtro movement. Yes, Fujifilm is certainly benefiting from it when it comes to camera sales, but they could be doing so much more.
People want to sport their favorite brands. As my kids would say, they want their fit to be fire. I would wear a Kodak Film shirt, and carry Kodachrome duffle bag. These things need to become available everywhere, and not just in South Korea. While Fujifilm does have a merch store, it’s pretty small with only a handful of options, and most if it isn’t newtro. Even if they have no interest in becoming an apparel brand, Fujifilm could license out their logo—especially their old emblems and trademarks—for other companies to use. I don’t know if they realize just how big this could be.
Fujifilm Drip – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Pacific Blues
Shirts, sweaters, jackets, and things like that are obvious options that both Kodak and Fujifilm should sell (or license to a third-party to sell). But camera accessories—straps, bags, etc.—should not be overlooked. For Kodak, why not license to a camera brand? There could be a Leica M11 Kodak collectors edition, with some red and yellow trim, for example. Or—shockingly—a Kodak edition of a Fujifilm camera, something like my faux Kodak Retina.
Fujifilm’s recommitment to retro-styled bodies comes at an opportune time. With the historic demand of the X100VI, which has already outsold any previous X100-series camera, Fujifilm is working overtime on production—this camera has been a massive hit. Just this year Fujifilm released the GFX100RF, X half, and X-E5. Newtro doesn’t just apply to physical products, though. Fujifilm’s Film Simulations (and, of course, Recipes) are a big part of the appeal. Think of them as newtro aesthetics. They’re not quite film but a big nod to the retro look that film has produced for a very long time. Fujifilm has a massive leg-up on this compared to their competition, and it is an under appreciated aspect of their success. I think, though, that we’re seeing just the tip of the iceberg, and there’s a huge untapped potential. Kodak and Fujifilm both have big opportunities, and they could learn from each other how to fully capitalize on it.
Mennonite Plow – Ronks, PA – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Nostalgic Film
I get asked fairly regularly which Film Simulation Recipes are the most popular. For me, this is a fascinating topic, but it’s definitely hard to know definitively. While I get a glimpse on social media, my best gauge is the Fuji X Weekly website statistics; specifically, which Recipe articles are viewed the most. I don’t collect any data on the Fuji X Weekly App, so that’s no help—although, if I did, it would likely offer the most accurate picture; however, it would still be impossible to know which Recipes people programmed into their Fujifilm cameras, or how often they used each. Perhaps a survey would be particularly useful, yet even it has its limitations. While certainly a flawed method, page-view website statics offer the best glimpse at which Film Simulation Recipes are the most popular, so that’s what I’m using for this article. These are simply the Top 25 most-viewed Recipes on the Fuji X Weekly website so far in 2025.
It’s been awhile since I did one of these articles—the last time was for January. There’s always some movement from month-to-month, but overall it’s pretty predictable. Taking a six-month view offers more clear picture than a 30-day snapshot. For this reason, I might wait until the end of the year before I do another.
Those Recipes with Kodak brand names in the title—Kodachrome, Portra, Gold, Tri-X, etc., etc.—are usually the most popular. Classic Chrome is the king of film simulations, as the majority of the most-viewed Recipes are based on that film simulation. Classic Negative and Reala Ace are battling for the second and third positions. Acros, Eterna, and Nostalgic Neg. are neck-in-neck-in-neck for fourth, fifth, and sixth places.
Without any further delay, below are the most popular Recipes at the halfway point of 2025!
Top 25 Most Popular Film Simulation Recipes of 2025 (so far…)
Reggie’s Portra is now the number one top Film Simulation Recipe on Fuji X Weekly! It’s always been popular, but interest in this Recipe has soared this year. Reggie Ballesteros created it by modifying my Kodak Portra 400 Recipe to better suit his style and needs. Of the various Portra Recipes, this is the most versatile, and the most popular for portrait photography. This is for X-Trans IV cameras; for X-Trans V, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off.
A Classic Chrome based Recipe for X-Trans IV cameras that was the long-time most popular Film Simulation Recipe for Fujifilm cameras on this website. It’s one of my personal favorites.
Pacific Blues and Reala Ace go back-and-forth for which is the most popular Classic Negative Recipe; currently, it’s Pacific Blues. This particular version is compatible with X-Trans IV models, but there is also an X-Trans V version that’s further down the list. This is another of my personal favorite Recipes.
This version of Kodak Portra 400, which is compatible with X-Trans IV cameras, was once commonly the third most popular Film Simulation Recipe on Fuji X Weekly. While it doesn’t rank as high as it once did, it’s still quite popular.
This is the long-time most popular B&W Recipe on Fuji X Weekly. It’s based on the Acros film simulation, and has compatibility with X-Trans III, X-Trans IV, and X-Trans V models. This is one of my absolute top-favorite Recipes.
This is a somewhat newish Recipe, published on October 31st. It uses the Reala Ace film simulation, which means that it is compatible with X-Trans V cameras.
It is probably unfair to include the Film Dial Recipes in this list because it is not one Recipe, but 14. When it showed up in the Top 25, I was faced with the choice to included it (as unfair as that might be) or not. The Vibrant Arizona article is technically four Recipes, so there is a precedence for its inclusion. I have no idea which of the 14 are the most used.
Like the Film Dial Recipe set, this is actually 14 Recipes and not just one. Its inclusion is a little unfair, but here it is. I have no way of knowing which of the 14 are the most used.
This Recipe uses Classic Chrome and is compatible with both X-Trans IV and X-Trans V models. Interestingly enough, Fujifilm has displayed two of my images at events over the last year, and both were created using this Classic Color Recipe.
Vintage Kodachrome, which is based on Classic Chrome, is one of the older Film Simulation Recipes on Fuji X Weekly, and is compatible with X-Trans III cameras.
This new Recipe, which I’m calling Summer Sun, is bright and warm. If a hot summer day was a picture aesthetic, it’s this. It has a vintage film-like charm, maybe along the lines of Kodak Ultra Color 100UC used with a warming filter (maybe 81C). It’s not specifically modeled after that, but has some similarities nonetheless.
Death of a Chevy – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Summer Sun Recipe
This Summer Sun Recipe is very warm, so it’s definitely not for every subject or light situation. It’s best on a bright sunny day, but can still be okay in partly-sunny situations. It’s compatible with all fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, which (as of this writing) are the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. It’s also compatible with the latest GFX models, specifically the GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Film Simulation: Reala Ace Dynamic Range: DR200 Grain Effect: Strong, Small Color Chrome Effect: Strong Color Chrome FX Blue: Weak White Balance: 7200K, -2 Red & +2 Blue Highlight: -1 Shadow: -2 Color: +4 Sharpness: -1 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: -3 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: 0 to +2/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Summer Sun Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5, X100VI & X-S20:
Manhattan from Hotel Window – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Fruits & Vegetables – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Building Backsides – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Spirits of the Past – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Green Mack – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
It’s Corn – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Newly Planted Palms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Evening Palm Tree – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Suburban Palm – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Flowering Tree – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
Brooklyn Bridge between Trees – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Bridge, Runner – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
It’s All Greek to Me – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
Red Dumpster – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
Summer Joy – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Hidden Tower – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
Fireworks Stop – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
I’m hesitant to write this review, because the Fujifilm X half is paradoxical. There’s a lot about it that’s conflicting. You can say this aspect of it is great for a certain group of people, but this aspect of it is not. This might be the most unique digital camera ever made, so it’s going to get a lot of attention, but also a lot of criticism. Trying to figure out who will most appreciate the X half (also called X-HF1) has been an intriguing endeavor.
To be completely transparent, it’s important for me to tell you upfront that Fujifilm sent me an X half to keep. Yea! Thank you, Fujifilm. I didn’t pay a dime for the camera. But I did have an X half preordered, so I was planning to spend money on one. I’m doing my best to not let my impressions be colored by Fujifilm’s kind generosity.
There are a few things that are unique about X-HF1. The headline is the vertically-mounted 1″ sensor. As far as I know, this is the very first camera to have a vertical sensor, all others are horizontal—that is, aside from cellphones. A lot of people—younger people especially—tend to photograph vertically on their cellphones, so it was just a matter of time before a camera would have a tall sensor. The X half is revolutionary because it’s the very first. I suspect there will be more in the future, and Fujifilm won’t be the only brand. Speaking of 1″ sensors, the name is a bit misleading. The surface area of a so-called 1″ sensor is the same as old 1″ Vidicon vacuum tube television cameras. So the name (“one inch”) has to do with the tube size of TV cameras from the ’50’s, ’60’s and ’70’s, and not the dimensions of the sensor.
The inspiration for the X half—and where the name comes from—are half-frame film cameras, like the Fujica Half, Olympus Pen, Kodak H35N, and Pentax 17. These cameras use half of a 35mm frame for each picture, orientated tall. Some medium-format cameras also are natively portrait orientated. Cameras that capture vertical photos are not new, but they are new in the digital age. Of course it has to be said that the X-HF1’s sensor isn’t half the size of a full-frame sensor, or even half the size of APS-C; no, the X half‘s “half” is not a mathematical term, but simply a nod to analog half-frame cameras. The 3:4 aspect ratio is also the same as half-frame cameras.
Like a half-frame film camera, the X half is capable of creating diptychs, which are two frames side-by-side combined into one image. You can do this easily in-camera using the Frame Advance Lever, or after-the-fact using the new X half app. It’s a heck-of-a-lot of fun, but I imagine that the novelty will wear off after awhile. While it will put a (customizable) bar in-between the two frames, I wish it had the option for a boarder around the whole image like in the examples above, which was done using a third-party app. Maybe Fujifilm will add this feature to the X half app in the future.
The X-HF1 is as minimalistic as it gets in the X-series. The menu has been simplified and streamlined, and a lot of settings have been left out. You cannot use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera, only the stock Film Simulations and Filters. Not all of the Film Sims made the cut, but most of them are there: Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Negative, Eterna, Acros (include +Ye, +R & +G), and Sepia. I would rather have Eterna Bleach Bypass over Sepia, but it’s a good group overall. There are a whole bunch of Filters (called Advanced Filters on other X-series cameras), some of which are borrowed from the Instax Evo cameras. My favorites are Pop Color, Light Leak, Expired Film, and Retro. These cannot be used in addition to Film Simulations—it’s one or the other, and not both. The list of Filters is quite long, and I don’t have an interest in most of them, so I wish that you could customize which ones are available, to make it easier to find and select the ones you actually want to use.
Above: Pop Color Filter
Above: Light Leak Filter
Above: Expired Film Filter
Above: Retro Filter
Pop Color is reminiscent of Fujichrome Fortia. I’d actually like to see it graduate to Film Simulation status. Light Leak, as well as filters like Halation and Vignette, should become JPEG options on other X-series cameras, that can be added to any Film Simulation. Expired Film and Retro should be added as Advanced Filters. Of the three Expired Film options, Green and Neutral are my favorites.
The only customizations that are available are Grain, Portrait Enhancer (which I believe is just Smooth Skin Effect renamed), White Balance (but no WB Shift), and Long Exposure NR. One cool thing is that these are also applied to the Filters, and not just the Film Simulations—I’d love for that to make its way to other X-series cameras. Beyond that, the Film Simulations and Filters cannot be customized to achieve various looks, which is a real bummer for someone like me who uses Recipes extensively.
Top left: Weak / Small Grain. Top right: Strong / Large Grain. Bottom: Actual Ilford Delta P3200 film
I enjoy a little grain in my photos. It adds texture that’s been common in photography for much of its existence. The X-HF1 has faux grain, with four options: Weak/Small, Weak/Large, Strong/Small, and Strong/Large. Grain set to Weak/Small on the X half is a little more pronounced than Strong/Large is on (for example) the X100VI. I wish that there was a less strong option than Weak/Small, because it’s borderline too much; however, since there’s not, I used it almost exclusively. Strong/Large is a bit ridiculous, and is reminiscent of the grain of ultra-high ISO films like Ilford Delta P3200. If you want to achieve an Ilford Delta P3200 look, the X half isn’t far off at all when Grain is set to its maximum parameters.
Another word about Grain is that it slows the camera down, much like Clarity on other X-series cameras. I found this to be odd, and my theory is that when Grain is applied, so is Clarity (maybe -2). I tried to prove this, but couldn’t, so I might be completely wrong. I have another theory that—for Film Simulations, at least, and maybe for Filters—Color is increased as exposure is increased, and is reduced as the exposure is reduced. I also tried to prove this, but got mixed results, so I’m not certain if this is how the camera is programmed, or just a natural effect of over and under exposure.
Above: Classic Negative
The camera seems to apply a heavy-handed noise reduction, and then a heavy-handed sharpening to compensate. I would love to have some control over this, as it’s not my favorite approach. It might be necessary, though, since the X-HF1 has a Bayer sensor instead of X-Trans. One benefit of X-Trans that doesn’t get discussed enough is that it allows noise to be more easily identified and controlled; Fujifilm uses this to make it more film-grain-like, and less of a nuisance. Since this is a Bayer camera, it might require a little stronger noise reduction.
Another benefit of X-Trans is that it has more green pixels (55%, compared to 50% on Bayer), which allows for more luminosity information. This provides a little more dynamic range and high-ISO capabilities. On the X half, dynamic range is quite limited. I would say it’s roughly comparable to DR100 with Highlight and Shadow set to +0.5 on other X-series cameras. It’s fairly easy to clip highlights and/or block up shadows, and is a little like slide film in this regard. Since this camera is JPEG-only (no RAW), you have to be very careful about the exposure.
Above left: ISO 1600. Above right: ISO 4000
I found that I prefer ISO 400 and below on the X half, reminiscent of Sigma Merrill cameras, which has a similar limitation. In a pinch you can go higher, especially if the picture will only be shared to social media, but I tried my best to keep the ISO at or below ISO 400 whenever possible. Because the maximum aperture of the lens is “only” f/2.8, when the sun goes down it can be very challenging to use the camera.
The X-HF1 does have a built-in flash, albeit not a great one. It doesn’t have a hotshoe, only a coldshoe. Flash photography is, unfortunately, not ideal on this camera, which is too bad, since it has a leaf shutter. If Fujifilm someday makes a second version, I hope that it either has a proper flash or a hotshoe (or both), as this current setup is mediocre at best. I kept the flash off most of the time.
Above: Flash photography on the X half
One really cool feature is called Film Camera Mode. You select either 36, 54, or 72 shots, and you are dedicated to that mode until you’ve completed your “roll of film”—which is whatever Film Simulation you chose. I do wish that 24 was an option, as it takes awhile to finish a roll. You cannot review the photos until they’ve been “developed” in the X half app. In this mode, the X-HF1 functions similarly to point-and-shoot film cameras from the 1990’s. You have to use the Frame Advance Lever in-between shots. It’s a ton of fun, but also challenging, because you have no idea if you correctly exposed, focused, or even if you framed it well. I kept forgetting to take the lens cap off, too. My daughter coined the 72 shot roll as the 72 exposure challenge. I’d love for that to become a community-driven trend, where people post their best frames from their 72 exposure “roll” on social media, with the hashtag #72exposurechallenge.
It would be nice if you could use the various Filters in this mode, and not just the Film Simulations. ***Edit: I was on a pre-production firmware; however, after updating to the latest version, I can now use Filters in the Film Camera Mode. Yea! Sorry for the confusion.*** Another thing I’d appreciate is that whatever ISO you have selected is carried over to the Film Camera Mode. Unfortunately, you only get Auto ISO up to ISO 12800, which is totally unusable whenever it goes that high. Fortunately, your Grain and White Balance settings are carried over, so be sure to set those before starting.
Above: X half contact sheet and various frames
Once you develop your “roll” in the app, you get a contact sheet. It would be great if you could long-press on a frame, and it would give you the option of saving that frame with the sprockets, or that frame plus the one next to it (on either side, unless it’s the end of the strip), or the whole strip. Instead, you have to crop the contact sheet in order to accomplish that. But I’m a huge fan of the contact sheet in-general, it’s a really cool idea.
Overall, I enjoyed using the Film Camera Mode, but I found myself not using it as much as the regular shooting mode because you have to be in the mood for it. One of the challenges that I appreciate about the X-HF1 is finding the “right” Film Simulation or Filter, combined with the “best” White Balance, to convey the mood of the scene most appropriately. The X half is so simple that a three-year-old could use it, but to get the most out of it requires thinking a little more deeply about things that are easily taken for granted. It’s been one of the most simple yet most challenging cameras I’ve ever used—the paradox I mentioned in the opening sentence.
Fujifilm X half – Acros Film Simulation
The X half is capable of recording video, but it’s very mediocre. Someone will use it creatively just to prove the point that it can be done, but I think Fujifilm probably should have just left off video, which would have made an interesting statement. Or else, maybe do a faux 8mm thing with sprockets and light leaks and such—that would have been really cool. Food for thought for the next iteration, if there is one someday.
Who should consider buying this camera? I think there are a few obvious answers. First, the X-HF1 has a foot in both the X-series and the Instax world. For those unaware, Instax is bigger than X and GFX combined. I talked to a bunch of people—probably close to ten—who own an Instax camera yet don’t own any X-series model, and they were all highly interested in the X half. Six different people told me that it’s the only Fujifilm camera they want, aside from Instax. The X half is an obvious bridge into the X-series for these folks. Also, some people who shoot point-and-shoot film cameras but are tired of the cost of film will find this to be an intriguing option. At $25 to $50+ per roll (including development and scanning), it won’t take long for the X half to pay for itself. The X-HF1 is sort of like a digital 110 camera, and almost lomography-esque, so it’s not difficult to see the appeal. Third, digicams are all the rage right now among younger people, and this camera can be considered in that category, too.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
What about current X-series photographers? What about someone like me? The camera is a blast. It’s so much fun. But it’s a toy. It’s not a serious camera for serious photography (I’m sure someone will use it in a serious way just to prove the point that it can be). It’s great for casual snapshots. I used it extensively during nearly three weeks of travel, and it was my most-used camera during that time, even more than my Fujifilm X100VI. I have so many more pictures that I could share, this is only a small sampling. It’s so easy to always have on you, and I would rather use the X half than my iPhone, if only for the tactile experience and Fujifilm colors. If you think you’d enjoy it, it’s probably worthwhile to get. If you wonder why anyone would buy it, it’s probably not for you, and it’s easy to move on.
The biggest criticism is going to be the price. In America, the X half is a steep $850. Across the rest of the world, it’s roughly equivalent to $700 USD. Unfortunately, this was the first camera to include the new tariffs in the price (although Canon and Nikon have just implemented some price increases, and Sony will soon, too), so it’s a bit shocking. Some people will say it should be $200 or $300, and that’s highly unrealistic—just absurd and not even close to any level of reality. Some will say it should be $500, and I’d agree with that if it were pre-Covid; however, there’s been a lot of inflation since then. I believe that $650 to $700 is a fair price. $850 is a little much, but that’s largely not Fujifilm’s fault; hopefully the tariff situation will get resolved soon, and Fujifilm can drop the price to where it should be. I don’t know if that will happen, though, and if the camera sells really well at its current price, there may not be a reason to reduce it.
Above: Various diptych pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
The last thing that I want to address is the inability to use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera. Recipes are a pretty big thing in the Fujifilm world—the brand-new X-E5 actually uses the word “Recipe” in the camera menu. I appreciate excellent straight-out-of-camera results. While I would love to be able to customize the looks more in the X half, you can still get good picture aesthetics with the limited tools available in the camera. The photography continuum has been leaning towards less editing for a few years now, and this camera is just a natural and seemingly inevitable expression of that.
There’s a lot to like about the Fujifilm X half, and a lot that can be questioned. You have to accept the camera for what it is and forgive it for not being what it’s not; otherwise, it might grind on your nerves. But, for certain, the camera is very enjoyable, and it offers a unique shooting experience not found anywhere else. If you want the X half experience, you have to have an X half. But that unique experience will not appeal to everyone, and maybe not even to most X-series photographers. I do believe this camera will be quite successful, and will bring many people into the X-series fold, mainly from groups that the camera industry has largely ignored. This will be the first X-series camera for a number of people, and someday some of those people will upgrade to a more premium model, perhaps an X-M5, X-E5, or X100VI. I think all of that is very good. It’s quite obvious to me that the Fujifilm X-HF1 will be a trendy camera, especially among younger photographers, and you’re soon going to see X half pictures all over TikTok and Instagram.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
I just got back from the B&H BILD Expo in New York City late last night. I’ve been traveling almost the entire month of June. Today is only the third day so far that I’m actually home. There’s a lot that I need to get caught up on, and I apologize for being slow to respond. If you’ve sent me an email and I haven’t yet answered back, I’ll try to do so before the end of next week.
This was my first BILD Expo. Last year I led some photowalks at the NAB Show in New York, which was held in the same building (Javits Center). While both events were large, BILD was bigger and had a larger attendance in my estimation. I don’t know how many came out, but I heard it was over 10,000! It seemed like a huge success.
Fujifilm brought me out to help with their Fujifilm X-E5 touch-and-try station; specifically, I was in charge of the Recipe podium. My purpose was to talk about Film Simulation Recipes, and how those can be used with the X-E5. It was an honor to have my photo (created with the Classic Color Recipe) printed on the top of the Classic Chrome podium. There were five podiums—each with an X-E5 on top—and a Lego display in the middle. The Legos were just as big of an attraction as the new camera, so kudos to whoever had the idea to do that.
It was so great to meet lots of you in person. I have no idea how many stopped by to say hello, but it was a large number. I shook a lot of hands. I wish I could have talked longer with each of you, but it wasn’t an ideal situation for that, unfortunately. I spoke with Omar Gonzalez, Jason Vong and Vivienne (she showed me an incredible picture that she captured of the cherry blossoms in Japan using a Fujifilm X100VI and Recipe), Cam Mackey, Jared Polin (Fro Knows), and more. I have a lot of stories that I could tell, but my favorite is stumbling across someone from Ohio who was on my photowalk in Scottsdale last year at a chicken restaurant in Manhattan.
Because I was tethered to the Recipe podium, I didn’t get a chance to see very much of the BILD Expo. Even though I was there from before the doors opened until after the doors closed, I only experienced a tiny bit of it, so I cannot say much. Omar Gonzalez and Cam Mackey both have good recaps (I’m in Cam’s video, actually). Unfortunately, I didn’t take very many photos of the event because I was so busy. Now that I’m back home, I wish that I had made a bigger effort to use my camera more.
What I can say is that the Fujifilm X-E5 got a lot of attention—there was constantly a crowd. Thousands of people gave it a try, and the feedback was mostly positive. For every “it’s too expensive” there were ten “it’s priced right” or “that’s a bargain,” which I think is because of the build quality. There’s a notable difference in how the X-E5 looks and feels compared to the X-E4. Holding the X-E5 is more like holding the X100VI. There’s no denying that the X-E5 isn’t cheap, though. Because my podium was right next to the X half station, I got a close look at the interest in that camera, which was massive. I had nearly as many questions about the X half as I did the X-E5, and at least a handful of people told me that it’s the only Fujifilm camera they have an interest in. There were a few lulls in X half crowds on Day 2, while the X-E5 station remained consistently busy on both days. I also got to see the new GFX Eterna camera in person, which was cool. I think it will be a pretty unique cinematic tool.
That’s it for BILD. My wife and I walked around New York City a few times (the photos above were captured on my Fujifilm X100VI using the Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe). Photographically, it’s probably the best city in America, just because there are picture opportunities literally everywhere. You can’t help but be a great photographer. Just walk around with your camera and you’ll find something incredible. I would have loved to have stayed longer, but I’m also so glad to be home—it was amazing to sleep in my own bed for a change.
I’m hoping to finish my review of the Fujifilm X half in the next few days, and right after that I’ll have a writeup on the Fujifilm X-E5. I actually have an X-E5 right in front of me, but I only get to use it for a few days (I better hurry this up!). Then, next week, on Saturday, June 28th, I’ll be in Colorado Springs for a photowalk (click here to register). I hope to see you there!
In the Heritage Leather collection are six options: three colors and two sizes. The three colors are black, tan, and—my personal favorite—green. I picked the green color personally, and we called it “Fuji X Weekly Green” for obvious reasons—it even includes the Fuji X Weekly “X” logo stamped into the leather (the black and tan options do not). I’m using the Fuji X Weekly Green Heritage Straps personally on several of my Fujifilm cameras. The two sizes are 28″ and 38″, providing both a short and long option.
A refined evolution of Evergreen’s original minimalist strap (which I also use and like), the Heritage Leather strap is crafted from premium full-grain leather, oil-dyed and wax-finished for a natural look that develops a deep patina over time. The traditional split ring setup is compatible with most cameras, both vintage and new. Designed to echo the timeless look of classic rangefinder straps while adding a soft microfiber suede backing for comfort during long shoots. Lightweight and unobtrusive, this strap stays out of your way but holds up to serious use. Works with Fujifilm, Leica, Nikon, Canon, Sony, and vintage 35mm cameras—basically any camera that uses split ring connectors.
A Fujifilm X half diptych, which has nothing to do with this post.
I had previously told you to expect an announcement today, but it has been delayed by one day. It will now be tomorrow. Sorry about that. Check back tomorrow, as I’m really excited about this, and cannot wait to share it!
On Thursday in the early morning hours, Fujifilm announced the brand-new X-E5. I’ve been traveling in an RV up the east side of America, and just got home late last night. Preferably, I would have posted something about it on announcement day, but aside from being on the road, it was also my wife’s birthday. Because of that, I’m just now getting this typed out—I’m pretty much the last to the Fujifilm X-E5 party.
This upcoming Tuesday and Wednesday I will be at the B&H BILD Expo in New York City. A few weeks back Fujifilm invited me to be a part of their booth—specifically, to help with a “Film Simulation Station” (without any details of what that would be)—which, of course, I am honored to be a part of. Fast forward to a few days ago, just before the announcement of the X-E5, I had a conference call (while in the RV stopped in the middle of nowhere in Pennsylvania) that explained what my specific role was going to be: Fujifilm will have X-E5 cameras to touch-and-try, and I’m there to talk about Film Simulation Recipes with anyone who wants to. It’s going to be a great time, so I hope some of you can stop by. It was on that call that I first learned the camera not only has the ability to save three Recipes in the Film Simulation Dial, but that Fujifilm is using the term “Recipe” in the camera and manual.
Back in early 2017 (before I had even started Fuji X Weekly), I published two Film Simulation Recipes on a blog that I used to have prior to this one. When I showed my wife, she thought the term “Recipe” was a bit cringe, but I liked it, so I continued to use it, including when I launched Fuji X Weekly in August of 2017. Mostly by word of mouth, this website grew and grew (10 million page views two years in a row, and still growing), largely because people had an interest in my JPEG Recipes for Fujifilm cameras. Even though Fuji X Weekly began as a Fujifilm X100F journal, very quickly it became most known for Film Simulation Recipes.
In the summer of 2020, I received a message from a talented cinematographer, who had a funny conversation with Fujifilm North America that he wanted to share with me. They had loaned him an X100V for a few weeks; when he returned it, they asked for his feedback. He told them, “I really like shooting with Portra 400 and Tri-X.” They replied, “What do you mean? It’s a digital camera.” He was very surprised that Fujifilm had no idea about Fuji X Weekly, so he informed them.
Shortly after this, Fujifilm North America reached out to me. They were more curious about what I was doing than anything else. They wanted to know what a Recipe is. It was a very positive phone call, and I was thrilled to talk with someone at Fujifilm for the first time. A few emails went back-and-forth, and I was asked to write an article for them. Excitedly, I got it typed out and over to them quickly. They said it was great, and they would forward it up the chain. When it came back down, I was told that they liked my article, but they had to reject it because I had used competing brand names (like Kodak, Portra, Ilford, etc.). There wasn’t much communication after that, except that they wanted to use one of my pictures in an article. In December, Fujifilm sent me a coffee mug for Christmas.
A year later I was invited to be a guest on a Fujifilm tech webinar (did you know that Fujifilm does regular webinars?). The tech team is great. They’re all very knowledgable and helpful, and otherwise good people. They are big fans of Film Simulation Recipes, too. I enjoyed that experience. It was my last interaction with the brand until January of 2024, when Fujifilm North America called out of the blue, stating that they’d like to start working with me.
Dumbo Crowd – Brooklyn, New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Reala Ace Recipe
Last year was epic. Fujifilm invited me to be a part of various things, including a release event for the X-T50 and GFX100S II, a creator retreat, and their annual Create With Us event. I traveled across the country from coast-to-coast, leading photowalks. Incredible! It was such an honor. I will always remember 2024 fondly.
During that time I noticed Fujifilm began to use the term “Recipe” occasionally on their website and social media accounts. A certain X-Photographer noted to me that after years of promoting Recipes with pretty much zero interest or help from Fujifilm, suddenly Recipes were “the thing” within the company. Now, in 2025, “Recipe” is an official Fujifilm feature, and the term is found within the camera menu.
Nikon beat Fujifilm to the punch when they began using the term Recipe a year ago for their JPEG settings. I’m not sure if it will catch on within that community or not (it will be interesting to see), but it is noteworthy that they are trying to capitalize on it. This whole Recipe concept—whether by name or not—is certainly growing and spreading across photography. I think we will see it more and more in the coming years.
I didn’t invent the word “recipe” and I certainly wasn’t the first to use it within the photo world. Apparently, user-created Capture One presets have been called recipes for some time now (I became aware of this last year, I had no idea). Specific darkroom chemicals and development times have been called recipes for many decades. I discovered that a couple people had used the word when describing their Fujifilm JPEG settings before I ever published my first Film Simulation Recipe. I’m not sure if I coined the term Recipe for JPEG camera setting combinations (I might have, but it doesn’t matter if I did or didn’t). What is certain is that if not for this website and the wonderful community that formed around using Recipes (which is the best community in all of photography, IMHO), the word would not be found in the Fujifilm X-E5 today (and it probably wouldn’t be used by Nikon, either). I’m still in disbelief at where we’re at today, I never imagined it would go this far. Some people will read that and think I’m bragging and taking too much credit, but believe me that I’m writing this in all humbleness.
I won’t get to see the Fujifilm X-E5 until Tuesday morning, about two hours before the BILD Expo doors open. Fujifilm tried to get me a loaner camera a little earlier, but due to travel, it just didn’t work out (it’s not their fault—they really did try). Right now I know as much about the X-E5 as the next person (maybe less), so I don’t have any real insights. I’m going to spend this weekend learning more so that I don’t sound completely ignorant at BILD. Once I’ve had a chance to touch it, and maybe even capture a couple of pictures (hopefully I’ll get an opportunity to do that), I’ll be able to speak more about it, so look for a more thorough article in a couple weeks.
What I can say is that the Fujifilm X-E5 is basically an interchangeable-lens X100VI. It’s not exactly that, but it’s as close as you’re going to get. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. The X100VI has an optical viewfinder, shutter/ISO combo dial, leaf shutter, flash, built-in ND-filter, and can be weather-sealed; the X-E5 has a Film Dial, selfie-capable LCD, and you can change lenses. Otherwise, the two cameras are a lot alike. For those that have asked for an interchangeable-lens X100VI, here it is! You are unlikely to get closer to that wish than this camera.
White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe
As a more premium iteration of the X-E line, it obviously has seen a price increase. Add to that inflation and tariffs, and you get a $1,700 price tag. That seems like a lot of money (because it is), but remember 1) every major camera maker has indicated that they will be raising their prices soon (Fujifilm is just the first, beginning with the X half and X-E5), and 2) cameras used to be a lot more expensive—for example, the Canon A-1 was $625 in 1978, which is over $3,000 when adjusted for inflation; the Pentax K-5 was $1,750 in 2010, which is nearly $2,600 in today’s money. The X-E1 was $1,000 in 2012, which is $1,400 today when accounting for inflation—add tariffs on top of that, and it’s the same cost as the X-E5. So maybe the price isn’t so unreasonable after all. People will say, “But I can get an X-T5 for the same money!” Or, “For just a few hundred dollars more, I can get [insert camera name here]!” That’s true, for now. Either the prices of those models will increase shortly, or something will happen with the tariffs, and Fujifilm will be able to reduce the price of the X-E5 to what it was intended to be. Those who wanted 40mp and IBIS and the camera to be more premium but didn’t want the cost to go up were not being realistic. Even the X-E4, when accounting for inflation would be over $1,000 today.
The final thing I’ll say about the Fujifilm X-E5 is that, with C1-C7, plus the “bonus 8th Recipe” that you can program into the IQ Menu, plus the three Recipe slots on the Film Dial, it’s possible to have up to 11 Film Simulation Recipes loaded into the camera at any given time. You can only name seven of them, so you’ll have to remember what the other four are. If you use one or both of my “universal” Recipes (here and here), that adds even more flexibility. Awesome! We’ll see if Fujifilm brings that functionality to the X-T50 and X-M5 via a firmware update—I hope they do.
If you are in New York City on Tuesday and Wednesday, be sure to stop by the Fujifilm booth and touch-and-try the X-E5. I’d love to chat Recipes with you, so be sure to look for me. If you are in Colorado Springs on June 28th, I’ll be leading a photowalk with Mike’s Camera (click here for the details and to register); while I won’t have an X-E5 with me, I’d still love to chat with you about it, or any other Fujifilm or photography related topics. I hope to see you soon!
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Fujifilm X-E5 in black: B&H, Nuzira Fujifilm X-E5 in silver: B&H, Nuzira
It has been quiet on this website over the last handful of days. I’m traveling up the east coast of America in an RV right now with my wife and four kids. We rented a motorhome, and are driving it from Miami to Boston. The trip is a little over halfway complete. We’ve seen so much, and had wonderful experiences, even though it has rained every single day. It’s been a great opportunity to try out the Fujifilm X half, and I’ll have a full review soon, which you can expect probably next week. Even though I’ve been on the road, I’ve still be busy behind-the-scenes with all sorts of projects.
First up is a surprise that I’ll announce in six days, on June 14th. It’s something that has been in the works for quite some time, and I’m really excited to share. I’m not going to say what it is just yet, so this paragraph stands as the first teaser. I’ll have the full reveal this coming Saturday—stay tuned!
Right after that, on June 17th and 18th, I’ll be in New York City for the B&H BILD Expo. Fujifilm is flying me out to help man their booth, which is where you’ll find me. If you go, be sure to stop by and say hi, as I’d love to meet you in person. The event is free (you do have to register), so if you are anywhere near the New York City area, be sure to join in on the fun.
223 – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X-HF1
On Saturday, June 28th, I will be leading a photowalk in Manitou Springs, Colorado, with Mike’s Camera and Fujifilm. We will meet at Mike’s Camera in Colorado Springs at 11:30 AM for a meet-and-greet, and to help with gear questions and setup Recipes. Around 12:00 noon we’ll caravan to Manitou Springs, and regroup at the Pikes Peak Library District. We’ll explore the scenic and quirky mountain town of Manitou Springs with our cameras for about two hours, before departing back to Mike’s Camera, where we’ll finish the event with some light refreshments. The cost is $25 per person; however, at the end of the event, each registrant will receive a $25 off coupon for use at Mike’s Camera, which basically makes the photowalk free. You must register (click here), and spaces are limited, so be sure to sign up today. If you live in Colorado or will be visiting that weekend, I hope you can come out for what will surely be an epic photowalk!
Mike’s Camera is doing so much for the photography community near their various stores. Not everyone lives in a place that has a store like this; those that do are quite lucky, so be sure to take full advantage of it: attend a class or join a photowalk. It’s an incredible honor to be a part of this community-building with Mike’s Camera, even though I don’t live anywhere near one of their locations.
There are a number of other exciting things in the works—these are just the ones coming up within the next three weeks. Hopefully soon I’ll be able to share even more news. There’s a ton to look forward to, including a camera announcement on the 12th. It will be great to see some of you in New York City and Colorado Springs this month!
I got a surprise package in the mail from Fujifilm: the brand-new X half! I will write a review of the camera in a few weeks probably—I haven’t had it nearly long enough to provide any proper insights. It’s a fun little camera, with some positive and negative aspects. We’ll talk about all of that at some point in the future. Today I want to write about how Fujifilm could implement some features of this camera into future X-series models.
Specifically, I want to discuss a few of the new Filters. Filters are not Film Simulations (although some of them are based on Provia); on all other X-series models, these are known as Advanced Filters. The X half has the usual array: Toy Camera, Miniature Effect, Pop Color, High-Key, Low-Key, Dynamic Tone, Soft Focus, and Partial Color. There are also some new ones, that apparently are borrowed from the Instax Evo line: Canvas, Retro, Vignette, Blur, Fisheye, Color Shift, Mirror, Double Exposure, Light Leak, Halation, and Expired Film. Some of these are uninteresting, and probably should have been left off the camera so that one could navigate the menu faster. But some of these are great, and should be included in future X-series models—just maybe not in the same way.
My favorite is Light Leak. With this filter, the camera puts a random faux light leak on your images. You don’t know what you’re going to get, and that serendipity can be thrilling, especially when it just really works with the image. I would love Light Leak to become a JPEG option (like Color Chrome Effect and Grain) on all X-series cameras moving forward. You should have three choices: All (where every picture gets a light leak), Random (where some pictures get it, but most don’t), or Off (for those who don’t want it at all). This would be such a fun thing for Fujifilm to add, and it seems like it wouldn’t be very difficult to do.
Film Leak Filter — Fujifilm X half
Next up is Expired Film, which has three options: Green, Red, and Neutral. This should be a new Advanced Filter on future X-series cameras. On the X half, your Grain settings get applied to the Filters (at least some of them; I haven’t tested them all yet), and not just the Film Simulations; however, on the X-series, you can’t apply Grain to the Advanced Filters. So this is actually two suggestions for Fujifilm: add Expired Film to Advanced Filters, and allow Grain to be selected for Advanced Filters.
Expired Film (Green) Filter — Fujifilm X half diptych
Third is Halation, which puts a red glow around bright highlights. This Filter should be a JPEG option that can be applied to any Film Simulation. I suggest three choices: Off, Weak, Strong. I would love to pair this effect with my CineStill 800T Recipe to more accurately mimic the film. The X half is not necessarily a great option for nighttime photography, so it’s almost a waste on this camera, but I definitely see potential for this effect on other X-series models.
Halation Filter — Fujifilm X half
I haven’t used Retro yet, but I’m sure it would be fine to join the Advanced Filter club. Vignette should probably be added as a JPEG option (like Color Chrome Effect and Grain). In my opinion, Fujifilm should graduate Pop Color to Film Simulation, and call it Fortia. In-camera diptychs are just a ton of fun, but I don’t see that coming to other cameras. The Film Camera Mode is pretty cool, and I’d like to see something similar be included in the next X-Pro or X100-series model (although maybe implemented slightly differently). The X half has plenty of unique features and functions, which is what makes it an interesting camera. In my opinion, some of these need to find their way into other models, and not remain solely on the X half.
Anyone who has ever used a Fujifilm X or GFX camera has used Film Simulations. No mater if you are a JPEG photographer or a strict RAW shooter, you use at least one Film Simulations. There’s no getting around it.
Those who claim “I don’t use Film Simulations” on their Fujifilm cameras are not being honest because it’s nearly impossible to disable them (we’ll get into that in a moment). What they are really stating is, “Film Simulations are for those JPEG people; I shoot RAW, so they don’t apply to me.” But, silly goose: they apply to the RAW photographer just as much as to those who shoot straight-out-of-camera. In some cases this may simply be ignorance, not realizing that Provia—the “standard” option—is one of the 20 Film Sims; however, I believe it can also be explained by arrogance: “Film Simulations are for JPEGs, and Real Photographers™ don’t shoot JPEGs.”
Interestingly enough, the most popular Film Simulation by far among strict RAW photographers is Provia, while the most popular Film Simulation by far among those who use Film Simulation Recipes is Classic Chrome. The Provia Film Simulation is intended to be broadly appealing, especially to those without a background in film photography. Classic Chrome is intended to appeal to those who want a film look. For those who use Recipes, Provia isn’t even one of the Top 5 most popular.
There are only two ways to disable the Film Simulations. The easiest and most obvious is to use the Advanced Filters, which, when activated, are in lieu of Film Simulations (although some of those are based on Provia); however, I don’t think the people who loathe Film Sims are using the Advanced Filter options. The second requires a camera with an OVF. Disable the EVF and turn off image playback. Only use the OVF. Then, in Lightroom, change the base color profile to your own or Lightroom’s neutral base. In that way, you never have to look at a Film Simulation.
The problem with saying “I don’t use Film Simulations” is that each time you look at the EVF or review on the LCD the photo you just captured, you are seeing it with a Film Simulation applied, most likely Provia. You are seeing the world through the lens of that Film Sim each time you use your camera. You may or may not use Lightroom’s or Capture One’s version of a particular Film Simulation when you edit your RAW photos (most probably do), but at the time of capture, you are absolutely using a Film Simulation.
Film Simulations are half the fun of Fujifilm cameras. Those who use Recipes already know this. My suspicion is that those who only ever use Provia haven’t tried the other options, or maybe only briefly did when their camera was brand-new before quickly dismissing them. In other words, they may not know what they’re missing. It’s quite possible that they’d like their cameras even more if they explored this feature.
Worn Out – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Classic Chrome – Kodak Portra 400 v2
My suggestion, if you are a strict RAW photographer who would never be caught dead shooting JPEGs, is to try the other Film Simulations. You might find one that better matches your vision more than Provia, which might help you to better visualize the final result at the time of capture. It can be a useful tool; you might find it to be less of a gimmick than you thought it was. Then, hopefully, we can move beyond the “I don’t use Film Simulations” nonsense, which is untrue. If you use a Fujifilm camera, you use Film Simulations. Period. Maybe you only use one, but you still use them.
As for the rest of us who find Film Simulations to be one of the defining features of our cameras, it’s ok to celebrate that. There’s no need to feel “less than” because some jerk talks down to you. If that person found what works best for him or her, that’s wonderful; if you found what works best for you, that’s equally as wonderful. There’s no right or wrong way to do photography, or one way that is superior. What I can say after meeting hundreds of you: these people might be common on the internet, but they are rare in real life. Most people are kind, friendly, and accepting. And, as it turns out, we have more in common than we thought, including that we all use Film Simulations.
In 1978, Pentax surprised the photographic world with the Auto 110, a tiny interchangeable-lens SLR that used 110 film cartridges. It was the smallest ILC ever made. For only $249, you got the body, a 24mm f/2.8 lens, a case, and a strap. Pentax discontinued the Auto 110 in 1986.
The concept of this camera was portability and simplicity. It was the smallest and lightest SLR ever made—probably the only one that’s pocketable. It was one of the most simple SLRs to operate. In order to accomplish these goals, Pentax built it around the 110 film format, which was considered subpar and only for amateurs. And that was the paradox: interchangeable-lens SLRs were for enthusiasts and pros, while 110 film was not.
Serious photographers would never, ever use 110 film. The camera was fully auto except for focus; at the time, anything auto was largely considered for novices, as “real photographers” used full manual. Interchangeable-lens SLR cameras were the standard for hobbyists and professionals. The Pentax Auto 110 occupied a weird space of being too robust and expensive for the uninitiated, yet too lackluster for anyone remotely serious. Who would buy it? While plenty of photographers scoffed at the Pentax Auto 110, it sold fairly well, and Pentax continued to make it for eight years—a pretty long run. So how did Pentax pull it off? Why was the camera not a flop?
There is a market for compact, unique, fun, less-serious cameras. The Pentax Auto 110 was able to get the most out of the small film format, delivering image quality that was plenty good enough for everyday moments. No, the pictures weren’t going to grace the cover of magazines or hang on museum walls, but they could be placed into photo albums, or in an 8″x10″ frame and hung in the hallway. It was so small and lightweight that the camera didn’t get in the way, and could be easily carried everywhere. It was simple enough to operate that most anyone could do it, as the complications of larger SLRs were removed. At the very least, it was a conversation starter (still is).
The Auto 110 was more affordable than other SLRs, at only $249. The Canon A-1, released the same year, was $625 (with a 50mm lens). Pentax released the iconic K1000 two years prior—in 1976—with an MSRP of $299 (with a 50mm lens), so for just $50 more one could get a much more respectable camera. It’s pretty interestingly if you adjust these numbers for inflation: $249 in 1978 is $1,230 today, $299 is $1,477, and $625 is $3,087! None of these cameras were cheap, not even the Auto 110.
Which brings me to what I want to discuss today, and that’s the cost of the Fujifilm X half. Unless something unexpected happens, this will be the last post about the new camera until after I get back from the B&H BILD Expo next month, so if you are tired of hearing about it, just bear with me a moment—I promise that we’ll get to other things. Let’s dive in!
Probably the biggest criticism of the X half is the price. $850 seems like a lot of money, because it is. The camera is a little expensive. I’ve seen plenty of people say that if it was $400 or $500, that would be the right cost. If it was 2015, I might agree, but there’s been some significant inflation since then. $500 in 2015 is $680 today, which is what I estimate would be a fair price for this camera (I said $700, but close enough). The reality is that things are expensive in 2025. And if you consider that the X half is probably the first to be adjusted for the tariffs, I think it’s more of a foreshadowing of what’s to come across the entire camera market in the coming months.
Yet the X half is still much cheaper—$380 cheaper—than the Pentax Auto 110 was in 1978, accounting for inflation. I knew the late-1970’s were rough economically, but I didn’t realize just how expensive things were. While there is plenty that’s divergent, I see some parallels between the Auto 110 and the X half, namely portability, simplicity, and casual fun. If the X half was transported back in time to 1978, it would sell for $172, which would have been considered a good bargain for the time; however, in 2025, $850 is a lot of money for what it is. Even as prices seem to skyrocket, it’s still much better than it was in the late-1970’s.
So where does that leave us? I think it’s good to have a healthy historical perspective, but that doesn’t help the wallet feel any less empty. I don’t know the future, but I think it’s unlikely that the tariffs are fully settled, and as things fall into place over the coming months, the opportunity to lower the price is a strong possibility. If the camera sells really well, and the backorder list is long, even if Fujifilm could drop the price, they would be silly to do so (but who knows, maybe they will). I don’t see the historic X100VI demand, but all indications are that preorder sales have been strong. I believe that the camera will do quite well for Fujifilm. Time will tell, though.
If you can accept the X half for what it is, and forgive it for not being what it’s not, it could be a really fun camera for capturing everyday moments. It’s not a serious camera for serious photography, yet it is priced nearly as if it is—just like the Pentax Auto 110 was. If you think you’d enjoy it, then consider grabbing one at some point; if not, it’s very easy to pass, and consider a more advanced model instead—you can get a Fujifilm X-T30 II with a lens today for less than a Pentax K1000 with a lens cost in the late-1970’s, adjusting for inflation. There are plenty of options for those that want an enthusiast or pro camera. The X half is one of a kind—the most unique digital camera ever made—and as such, it’s not going to be for everyone, and that’s ok.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
One of the disappointing aspects of the upcoming Fujifilm X half, which was just announced a couple days ago, is the video capabilities. Instead of allowing 9:16 1080p, the camera produces a 3:4 1080p video, which is less than HD once cropped to 9:16 for TikTok, Reels, and Shorts. It could have been an appealing feature for social media content creators, but the implementation fell short for that purpose.
One easy fix for this is to simply allow 9:16 1080p via a firmware update by taking full use of the sensor height. I don’t think that would be an especially difficult firmware to implement (could even be released by the time the camera is shipped), and would make the X half much more useful for video; however, one issue is still the mic. The built-in mic is so-so (as built-in mics typically are), and there is no option for an external mic. So either you deal with the quality of the built-in microphone, or you record the audio separately and sync it in software.
Another solution, which would be harder for Fujifilm to do but would better match the camera’s analog concept (and likely would excite some people), is to make an 8mm mode. Fujifilm could either make a lofi 4:3 crop from the 3:4 readout, or they could make you rotate the camera 90º to take full advantage of the resolution. I think either way would be acceptable, or even better is to offer the choice. In this mode, the camera would add sprockets to the edge, and simulate 8mm video camera aesthetics. Also in this mode, no sound is recorded. Clips created in this mode would look similar to the YouTube video below:
This would be a much more difficult firmware to create, but in-camera 8mm simulation would definitely be welcomed by some, and turn a disappointing feature into something that might actually get used. It would be viewed positively for the most part, I think, by those who purchase the camera. It’s doubtful that such a firmware could be made ready before the camera ships, but it could be a cool update for later in the summer. Or, should Fujifilm not want to create such a firmware update, if a successor eventually comes someday in the future, this is something to strongly consider for that camera. I do think there would be interest in an 8mm-like video feature, and the X half seems like an excellent candidate for it.
Also, the Evergreen + Fuji X Weekly case for the Fujifilm X100-series cameras is (and has been) out of stock on Amazon and directly from Evergreen Cases; however, it is still in stock at B&H, for those who might be interested.
One thing that might have been missed with the Fujifilm X half announcement is that the next X Summit will be in Shanghai on June 12th, which is less than three weeks away. I’m not sure what time, but most likely it will be in the early morning hours in the United States, or maybe late PM on the 11th for those on the west coast.
What gear will be announced? I don’t have any inside information—I find out the same way that you all do. I’m guessing a camera and lens, but that’s only a guess. Fujifilm will unveil it soon enough, though, so we won’t have to speculate for much longer.
It’s a bit unusual for Fujifilm to release two cameras so close together. It’s exciting times, even if one or both models are not all that interesting to you, personally. I’ve been saving up for a GFX100RF (still have a ways to go), but I might just divert those funds to what Fujifilm just released and is about to release.
Not very long after this X Summit is the B&H BILD Expo at the Javits Center in Manhattan on June 17th and 18th. Fujifilm invited me to come out to be a part of it, although I’m not sure yet what my role will be. This is a big event that you won’t want to miss! Peter McKinnon is one of the headline speakers, but there are many others, too. David Geffin, Kyler Steele, and Jasmine Quiñones are three that I personally recommend. It’s a free event (but you have to register), so if you are in the NYC area, be sure to attend—come say “hi” and chat a little.
I’m sure that Fujifilm will have on display a GFX100RF, X half, and whatever gear is upcoming. You can probably hold them, and it’s an opportunity to ask any questions you might have about these items from people who have personally used them and know them inside and out. Even if you don’t have any interest in that, be sure to stop by anyway—this is going to be a great time, and well worth the effort to get to.
There’s been a lot of negativity within the community about the new Fujifilm X half camera. A lot of positivity, too, but definitely a lot of gloom. I think it stems from a misunderstanding of who the camera is for. Understanding better the intended market segment might help to make sense of the camera. I think it’s also important to state that just because a particular model is not for you personally, doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t exist—if it becomes commercially successful (which I’m confident it will be), that is a strong argument that it should indeed exist because it obviously filled a market void, but maybe just not the particular void affecting you. It’s certainly ok to express your opinions about it, but preferably in a kind and constructive way. Not everything I said was positive because in all honesty, not everything about it is roses and rainbows; however, that doesn’t mean the camera is junk. With that out of the way, let’s get into this.
So who is the Fujifilm X half for? In my opinion, there are several primary groups. And just because someone doesn’t fit any of those groups, that doesn’t mean they won’t buy or appreciate the camera. I think this is a polarizing model that is definitely not for everyone, or even for most people. Some of you will love it, some of you will hate it, and that’s ok. This camera isn’t for everyone who regularly reads this website. In fact, the target audience most likely has never heard of Fuji X Weekly, or is maybe only vaguely familiar (but probably not).
One group is those who have recently discovered the joys of film photography, particularly those who have purchased the Pentax 17 or Kodak H35N—but not exclusively those people. Some have a 35mm point-and-shoot from the ’90’s. Some have been using Fujifilm Quicksnap disposable cameras. Film photography has seen a significant resurgence from the younger generation; however, it’s been hindered by the high cost of film and development, and sometimes the lack of availability. A camera that provides a similar experience and even aesthetic, but with the convenience of digital and with a one-time-fee entry point will be appealing to some of these people.
Another group is the digicam lovers. Surprisingly, the number one digital camera brand in Japan in 2024 was Kodak (actually, JK Imaging using the Kodak brand name). They’re selling a ton of cheap digicams that are basically 15-year-old tech and designs. Nobody in the camera world takes this seriously, but it is a sizable demographic. Retro digicams from 15 or 20 years ago are all the rage right now, too. The X half offers a graduation of sorts for those looking for a more premium option.
A third group is Instax users. Instax is the camera division’s money maker much more than the X-series is. Instant film photography is big and has been for awhile, and Fujifilm is king of the hill. At some point one can outgrow Instax; the Evo series is supposed to help with that, but it’s not a big step. So how can Fujifilm convince Instax photographers to take the leap into the X-series world? With a digital camera that offers a simple and analog-like experience with some Instax compatibility, of course!
In my opinion, those are the three main groups. That’s a pretty large umbrella, and you only need a small portion from each to sell a lot of copies. If you are not in one of those groups, you may still find the camera appealing, and might buy and love it (I might be one of those people); however, you’re not necessarily the target market for the X half. What’s fascinating—genius, really—is that this is a potential stepping stone into the system from the bottom. There’s always a lot of discussions about market share, and convincing those from other brands to join the fold. This camera is intended to bring in outsiders, and grow the brand unconventionally yet organically. Then, later, some of these people will buy an X-M5, X-T50, X100VI, etc., as their second X-series camera. I bet thousands get into the system this way.
Unfortunately, some of those who aren’t the target market have been trashing the camera online (not on this website, but elsewhere), and—much worse—speaking harshly of those who might buy it. My estimation is that the majority of sales will come from first-time Fujifilm photographers. I think it will sell fairly well to the existing X-series customer base because it’s a fun concept, but primarily it’s going to be someone’s first dip into the X-series pool. Instead of degrading these folks for liking and buying the camera, we should gladly welcome them into the community. If they have a good experience, they may just stick around for awhile, and that’s a very good thing for the brand and photography in-general. I think we need to be more welcoming and accepting of these newcomers, and not criticize them for making the purchase. I don’t think anyone here is doing that, but I’ve definitely seen it elsewhere, and it’s not healthy. It’s ok if this camera isn’t for you, but it is certainly for someone, and they’re going to absolutely love it.
Fujifilm announced a new camera last night called X half. It also goes by the name X-HF1, apparently. This is a 32mm (full-frame-equivalent) f/2.8 fixed-lens compact camera with a vertically mounted 1″ sensor, and is probably the most unique digital camera ever made—or, at the least, it offers the most unique photographic experience in all of digital photography. This isn’t a review, but I did want to give my thoughts on the release.
I haven’t used the camera, or even seen it in-person. I was up late last night watching the announcement and various review videos that were published, trying to figure out what this camera is. Now I’m awake typing this article after less than five hours of sleep, so if there are any typos, please excuse me. I’ve barely started my first cup of coffee. Anyway, Fujifilm released two videos, which I’ve included below.
In the weeks leading up to the release, I published two article about the X-HF1, speculating what it might be. The first was Why the Upcoming Fujifilm Half-Frame Camera is Genius, and I guessed that this was going to be an amazing camera, specifically designed for both a film-like photographic experience and recording vertical videos for TikToks and Reels. The second was What if the upcoming Fujifilm Xhalf is something different?, where I second-guessed my prior article, and wondered if the camera was going to be stripped down, less video-centric, and more Instax than X-series. Well, the X half seems to fall right in-between (maybe closer to the second take), and both articles had some things right and some wrong.
The new camera is intended to produce a film-like experience, and is capable of doing so in a unique way. In Film Camera Mode, you choose your “film” (Film Simulation) and how many frames (36, 54, or 72), and then you shoot through the Optical Viewfinder until the roll is fully exposed, using the frame advance lever in-between shots. You cannot see your pictures until after the roll is finished and “developed” in their new app that is just for this camera. I think this is super cool, and I hope this mode comes to some future camera, maybe the upcoming X-E5. There is a missed opportunity: Fujifilm offers photo printing services, so you should be able to order 4″x6″ prints of your roll of “film” from the new app. It would be so much fun to order prints, then wait until they arrive in the mail before reviewing the pictures. It would encourage people to print their photos, which isn’t done nearly enough nowadays. And it would be a way for Fujifilm to make some extra money on a service they already offer. Maybe they’ll update the app to include this in the future, as it seems like an obvious oversight.
The X half has a 20mp 1″ Bayer sensor, but only uses 18mp because it crops out 2mp to accommodate the 3:4 aspect ratio (the sensor is 2:3). If you want to crop your pictures to 2:3, you’ll lose a little more resolution, but it is still plenty for social media and web use, as well as prints smaller than 16″x24″. It would have been nice if one could choose to use the full sensor and the 2:3 aspect ratio, but with the X-HF1, Fujifilm significantly stripped down the menu and customizations. They made the camera about simplicity, but in doing so you lose out on some of what makes Fujifilm cameras special; namely, you cannot use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera, since you cannot control the various parameters like you can on any other X-series model.
Instead of 20 Film Simulations, this camera only has 13: Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Negative, Eterna, Acros, Acros+Y/+R/+G, an Sepia. It’s too bad Sepia made the cut over PRO Neg. Hi, PRO Neg. Std, and Eterna Bleach Bypass. While you cannot use Recipes, the Film Simulations seem to produce a slightly divergent look than the standard Film Sims, almost as if Fujifilm programmed each with its own Recipe, for what that’s worth. There are also so-called Advanced Filters, including a few new ones borrowed from the Instax Evo cameras.
While the X half does shoot vertical video, the quality seems suspect. I’m sure there are some who will appreciate this and will create some interesting content with it, but it’s a big miss in my opinion. They should have allowed 1080p in the 9:16 aspect ratio so it would have been more useful for social media video creation. The X-HF1 could have been a trendy camera for TikToks, Reels, and Shorts, but I just don’t see that happening with the video implementation. The capability of video-video and still-video diptychs are a bit intriguing, but I don’t think that will catch on as anything more than a passing curiosity. Or don’t included video capabilities at all—I think that would have made a bigger statement (and would have been viewed more positively) than how it was implemented.
So what do I make of the X half? It looks nice. It’s very compact, which is perfect for everyday carry or travel. It’s minimalistic, which can be good. It offers a very unique shooting experience that looks like a lot of fun. It seems like a bridge between Instax and the X-series, and I think it’s fair to consider it more like a very-high-end Instax Evo camera without a printer than a bottom-end X-series model (it’s basically both). It will certainly be a very controversial camera (maybe the most), with perhaps the biggest controversy being the price: an MSRP of $850, which seems high for what it is. Some people are going to love it, and some are going to hate it. I think it will be especially popular with Gen Z and Gen Alpha, who are currently fascinated with classic digicams and film cameras, including half-frame models like the Pentax 17. Me? I applaud Fujifilm for daring to be different, and going way outside the box. I did preorder one last night, but I’m a bit unsure if I’m actually going to like it or not. Now excuse me while I pour that second cup of coffee….
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
One of Fujifilm’s most beloved lines is the X-E series. While never the most popular, X-E cameras have a passionate cult-like following. My first Fujifilm camera was an X-E1, so I have a special place in my heart for the line. The X-E4 is currently my favorite for travel photography, especially when paired with pancake lenses. At this time, Fujifilm doesn’t offer an X-E camera—the last one was the X-E4, but it was discontinued over two years ago.
The X-E1, which was announced in the fall of 2012, was a striking camera that caught a lot of people’s attention with its retro styling and compact design; however, there were some initial issues (later rectified via firmware updates) that hindered the perception of it. One year later, Fujifilm released the X-E2, which had a new sensor and was largely free of the problems that had given its predecessor bad press. This was a successful model for Fujifilm, but the X-series was still pretty new, with a small (but quickly growing) market share. The X-E2s was released three years later; it was almost just a firmware update disguised as a new camera, and Fujifilm later gave that same firmware to the X-E2. A lot of people consider the X-E2 and the X-E2s (which had a pretty short run) to be the same camera, because they basically are (although not 100%). In the fall of 2017, Fujifilm announced the X-E3, at a time when the X-series seemed to be hitting its stride, with several commercially successful models coming before (X-Pro2, X100F, X-T2, X-T20). I think there were some high sales expectations for the X-E3; however, demand turned out to be sluggish, and the camera had to be discounted in order to move the inventory. Because it was considered a bit of a “flop” (too many copies were manufactured for the actual demand), there were some rumblings that the X-E3 might be the last model in that series. Thankfully it wasn’t.
White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe
In March of 2021, Fujifilm released the X-E4. I preordered my copy the moment it was announced; if I hadn’t, I might not own one today. Fujifilm used the sales figures of the X-E3 to estimate the demand for its successor, which was a fair assumption, but what they didn’t know is that the X100V was about to go viral, and it was going to take the X-E4 with it. Demand for the X-E4 turned out to be much greater than it had been for the X-E3; however, as luck would have it, this was during the Covid global parts shortage, and Fujifilm had trouble securing materials to manufacture more copies. Two years after it was released, and with a very long backorder list, the camera was discontinued.
Because there was so much unfulfilled demand, the second-hand market for the X-E4 went nuts. It was pretty common to find a used X-E4 selling for 50% more than the MSRP of a new model, and sometimes double. Crazy! If sales had been slow, it very well might have been the final nail in the X-E coffin; however, sales were good, except that Fujifilm discontinued the camera at the peak of its popularity because they ran out of parts. Now, a little over two years later, apparently a new model is forthcoming. Interestingly, in 2023 I predicted that the X-E5 might come in the spring of 2025… not a bad guess, only slightly off. Let me quickly discuss what I hope for with the X-E5.
Beach Chairs – Folly Beach, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Velvia Film
A lot of people wanted to buy the X-E4 but just couldn’t find one in stock, so I wouldn’t change much. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. There are five things I would do different, and otherwise I’d leave it alone. I don’t think Fujifilm needs to reinvent the wheel here.
The five things that I would change, which would make the X-E5 pretty much perfect in my eyes, are simple: use the Shutter/ISO combo dial of the X100/X-Pro series, include an M/C/S switch, include a rear command dial, improve the EVF resolution, and use the X-Processor 5. That’s it. Keep the design the same, keep the sensor the same, use the same battery—keep almost all of it the same. Do this, and it will be a very successful camera.
Some people will demand IBIS and claim that the X-E5 must have it or the camera’s a dud. I don’t care if it does or doesn’t have IBIS, I’m fine either way. For still photography, IBIS is nice, but is oftentimes very overstated. It’s not a critical feature whatsoever for most people and circumstances. It does add weight (and probably size), cost, and battery life—in other words, there are tradeoffs. I’m ok with either choice, but I definitely lean towards its exclusion.
Will it have a small grip like the X-E3? It could, but if it doesn’t have IBIS, it’s lightweight enough that the omission is not a problem (it’s not a problem on the X-E4); personally, I’d welcome it for times when a larger lens is attached to the camera. They could include a built-in flash (the X-E1 and X-E2 had a flash), but it doesn’t bother me even slightly that the X-E4 doesn’t have one. I’d be a little surprised if the X-E5 has the 40mp X-Trans V sensor, but it certainly could. I’m more inclined to believe that it will have the 26mp X-Trans IV sensor like the X-S20 and X-M5, if for no other reason than to keep the cost down. The Film Dial? I like it personally, and I’d be curious to see how it might be implemented, but it doesn’t seem like an easy addition (the EVF is in the way), so I’m guessing no, the camera won’t have it.
One final point I’d like to make in this article is in regards to timing. The X-E1 was the second-to-last X-Trans I camera (X-M1 was last), the X-E2s was the second-to-last X-Trans II camera (X70 was last), the X-E3 was the second-to-last X-Trans III camera (X-H1 was last), and the X-E4 was the second-to-last X-Processor 4 model (X-T30 II was last). Fujifilm has used the X-E series to mark the sunset of each generation, with one camera model to follow. It’s reasonable to assume that we’re nearing the end of the fifth-generation. My prediction, which is merely a guess and nothing more, is that an X-T30 III (an X-T30 II but with X-Processor 5) will be announced in the fall, and the X-Pro4 (maybe called X-Pro5), which will be the first sixth-generation camera, will be announced in January or February of 2026. I’ve guessed wrong many times before, so take this with a massive grain of salt.
This is a one-year photo-a-day project called 52 Weeks of Photography. Even though it is a year-long undertaking, I’m taking it one week at a time, because it’s a little easier to manage many small blocks than one large chunk. This is the 20th week, so the 20th set of seven images.
The reason why I’m doing this 365 Day project is because I noticed some gaps in-between my images last year. I didn’t pick up my cameras daily. On several occasions, four or five days passed by without a single picture created. Twice in 2024, I skipped a whole week. I want to rectify this, and get back into the habit of daily photography. I also want to elevate the quality of my craft in 2025, and am hoping that this will help.
Mountain Grass & Flowers – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Velvia Slide
The plan is to capture a year’s worth of notable images, either personally or artistically. Ansel Adams famously stated, “Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.” It’s important to keep expectations realistic, but I’m also trying to avoid thoughtless snapshots just to fulfill the day’s requirement. I want to push myself to be better, and hopefully that will happen. Not every photo will be great—in fact, most won’t—but I hope they are all at least decent enough to be shared without embarrassment. And maybe when the whole project is complete, there will be 12 significant pictures (out of the 365) that I’m particularly proud of.
This was an exceptionally busy week, but I managed to pick up a camera each day, at least for a few pictures. A couple of days produced a number of good photos, and a couple of days not so much. I flew out to Denver to lead a photowalk in Boulder with Mike’s Camera. That was a lot of fun, and also by far my most photographically productive day of this week.
Flatiron from Behind – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm X100VI & TCL – The Rockwell
Interestingly, I was just reviewing my pictures created over the last few years for an upcoming project, and almost all of my favorite photos—at least 80%—were made while traveling. My guess is that 80%+ of my total photos were captured local near my home, but that accounted for at most 20% of my favorites, while less than 20% were made while on a trip somewhere, yet that accounted for the majority of my favorites.
What I takeaway from this is that I need to be more creative at home. I need to view my local area more as a first-time tourist and less as a resident who has seen the sites a hundred times. I also need to make a better effort to get to the local places that are photographically interesting. I need my local photography hit-rate to be closer to my travel photography hit-rate. With all of that said, when you visit amazing places, it’s a lot easier to create amazing pictures, so maybe that accounts for a good deal of it, too.
Without further ado, below are the 20th set of seven pictures from this 52 Weeks of Photography project.
Tuesday, May 6th, 2025
Half Moon Between Branches – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Superia Negative
Wednesday, May 7th, 2025
Growing, Building – Litchfield Park, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 & 27mm f/2.8 – Superia Negative
Thursday, May 8th, 2025
Hanging Flower Pot – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Superia Negative
Friday, May 9th, 2025
Ricoh Camera, Phoenix Film – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Nostalgic Film
Mountain Grass & Flowers – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Velvia Slide Recipe
Back in January, I published the Provia Summer Patron Early-Access Recipe, which was supposed to kick off a series of Early-Access Recipes to help clear out the backlog. I never intended for the Early-Access Recipes to be locked for as long as they have been, so I decided to fix that in 2025. My goal for this series was to publish a new Recipe every three to four weeks; however, it’s now May, and this is only the second one. I will try to do better moving forward.
My intention for the Velvia Slide Recipe was a replication of Velvia 100 color reversal (slide) film, which should not be confused with Velvia 50 or Velvia 100F (although Velvia 100 is pretty similar to Velvia 50). I never used Velvia 100 (I have used Velvia 50 many times), so I relied on online resources, as well as my Velvia 50 slides. I feel like, in the right light, this Recipe does quite well at mimicking it, but it’s not always correct. It’s sometimes really convincing and sometimes less so; however, either way, I really like the look of it.
Book & Fake Succulent – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4 – Velvia Slide Recipe
While there are many Film Simulation Recipes that use Velvia, this one is not quite like any that I’ve previously published. Perhaps Kodak Ektachrome E100VS and Improved Velvia are the closest. It works best in sunny daylight, but can also be good for natural light indoors. It’s especially well suited for colorful landscape photography.
This is a Patron Early-Access Recipe. If you are a Fuji X Weekly App Patron, you have access to it right now. If not, no worries, as it will eventually be made available to everyone, once it is replaced by a new Early-Access Recipe. With the exception of the X-T3 and X-T30, it is compatible with all fourth and fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, which (as of this writing) are the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, and X-M5. It can also be used on the newer GFX models, including the GFX100S, GFX100S II, GFX100 II, and GFZ100RF.
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this Velvia Slide Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-T4, X-S20, and GFX100S II:
Bougainvillea in Spring – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Oleander Branch in Bloom – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Garden Flowers – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
Blooming Bougainvillea – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Yellow Bougainvillea Backlit – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Palm Branch Curve – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Toyotires – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
Palm Trunk – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Spring Sun – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Setting Sun – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
Hawk Perched on Desert Rocks – Rock Springs, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Old Dog – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Lake Waves – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T4
Flatirons – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Mohawk Mountain – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and 400 more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
