November | 2025 | FUJI X WEEKLY

The most stolen from photographer in history?

I might be the most stolen from photographer in the history of the world. This might seem like a strange claim, but it’s potentially true. It might not be true, but it certainly could be, so let’s dig into it. To clarify, I’m not claiming to be the victim of the most egregious thefts. I’m not claiming that the monetary value is anywhere near the most. Specifically, what I’m wondering is if I’ve had more photographs stolen than anyone else. In other words, am I the most stolen from photographer by total number of photographs stolen? I think it’s also important to clarify what “stolen” means: unauthorized use or reproduction of my pictures that violate my copyright. As the photographer, I own the rights to my pictures, and if someone uses them without permission outside of “fair use” circumstances, that’s theft. Maybe they’re attempting to earn money, or maybe they’re attempting to gain notoriety, but they’re doing it with my photos and not their own.

I think there are a couple of unique circumstances that make this claim possibly plausible. First, I publish more pictures than most photographers. Because I make hundreds of Film Simulation Recipes, and those Recipes require a lot of sample images (at least 15, and up to 50, per Recipe), I share far more than most. That might be to my disadvantage, because, while the majority of photographers only post their best work, I show you a lot of mediocre pictures along with the good ones; if I only showed my portfolio-quality images, you might think that I’m more talented than my so-so pictures seem to indicate. Second, one theft can be many photos—not just tens of photos, not just hundreds of photos, but thousands of them.

The most egregious example is when someone hacked the Fuji X Weekly App and made a clone of it, which they uploaded to the app store, and made money on until it was (thankfully) removed for copyright violations. I sure hope none of you fell victim to that, and I’m really sorry if you did. The Fuji X Weekly App had about 350 Recipes on it at that time (now there are over 400), and with five pictures per Recipe, that’s about 1,750 copyright violations just in that one circumstance alone. But that’s not the only circumstance, not even close.

Above left: My photo, entitled Morning Mist, captured using my Fujicolor 100 Gold Recipe; Above right: that same photo and Recipe in an app that isn’t mine used without permission.

Aside from some other apps that have my photos in them without permission, there are tons and tons of websites. Today, I did a reverse Google search on 30 of my photos, and 16 of them had at least one circumstance of theft. I don’t know how many pictures are on fujixweekly.com—I estimate that it’s over 10,000—if half of those have been stolen somewhere and are being used illegally across the internet, that’s a massive amount. Some photos have multiple examples of theft just from one image (I counted eight on one of those 16 pictures).

This isn’t anything new. I remember about 12 years ago reading my small town local newspaper, and being shocked to find one of my pictures being used in an advertisement. Over the years I’ve seen several of my photos on the front banner of corporate websites. I’ve tracked down hundreds of thefts and requested they take down my photos, but it’s only a tiny dent in the overall problem. This could be a full-time job, except that it doesn’t earn any money—in fact, it can be quite expensive, especially if attorneys have to get involved. I would quickly go broke if I pursued all the theft.

I think some of it is innocent enough. For example, someone is excited to share their favorite Film Simulation Recipe, so they do—only, instead of using their own photos captured with the Recipe, they use mine, and perhaps “forget” to even give me credit (which wouldn’t make it any less illegal, but perhaps more understandable). Some circumstances are fair use, especially if it’s only one or two picture and I’m given credit and linked back to. There’s definitely instances where the unauthorized use of my picture isn’t theft, and there are examples of it being grey areas, where it could be argued either way. But I’m not talking about that, I’m specifically talking about indisputable examples of blatant theft. Like right now, a large number of my pictures can be printed on t-shirts; I didn’t give permission for that, and I won’t receive a penny of profit should someone order one of those shirts.

Above left: My photo captured about 25 years ago on Kodachrome 64 film; Above right: that same photo can be printed on a t-shirt, without permission or compensation.

Unfortunately, some people think that if they can download a picture from the internet, it’s theirs to freely use. If it’s on the internet, it’s finder’s keeper. Legally that’s not true, but it is true in a practical sense. Who’s going to stop them? I would like to, but that’s a really tough hill to climb. It’s rare that they’re caught, and even if they are, it can very difficult to do anything about it, especially depending on the country where the theft happens in. It’s very easy for them to get away with it.

I posted a video to YouTube once, and it recognized a song in the background that was playing on the radio. I was flagged with a copyright violation, and I had to either silence that section of the video, or else I couldn’t monetize it (this is back when I was monetized on YouTube). Why can’t something like that exist for other art mediums? The technology obviously exists… I was able to reverse-search my photos, but that’s a slow and tedious manual process. Why can’t it be continuously running in the background, with copyright violation notices sent to the offending website owners automatically? I understand that such a service does exist for a fee, but it requires you to manually identify which photos are yours so that it can search for them, and it isn’t always accurate. It would take a long time for me show them all of my pictures, because there are so many. Again, this would be a full time job that doesn’t pay anything.

So far we’re just talking about my pictures. I’ve had entire articles ripped off many times. I’ve seen people post a Recipe that they “created” (sometimes claiming to have spent hours making it), and gladly accepting the praise for how good it is, except that all they did was copy-and-paste it from my website. The argument will be: “Well, sometimes great minds think alike, and it’s only by happenstance that they’re identical.” This ignores that there are 1,418,895,421,643,700 possible JPEG setting combinations (Recipes) on the latest Fujifilm models. That means every person in the world who owns a Fujifilm camera can have their own unique Recipes in each of their C1-C7 Custom Settings presets, and it would still not come anywhere close to exhausting all of the potential Recipes for Fujifilm cameras. ChatGPT says that the odds of two people independently creating the same exact Recipe are about 1-in-4-billion (that’s accounting for how common and uncommon certain settings are). If I were to make four billion Recipes and someone else were to make four billion, one would likely be identical (I’ve only made a little more than 400, not 4 billion). That’s not to say it’s impossible; however, it is extraordinarily unlikely (to put it mildly)—yet I’ve seen it probably close to a hundred times now, which is mathematically impossible. This is plagiarism, which is a type of theft: intellectual theft. We can go back to the guy who hacked my app and created a clone app with over 300 of my Recipes. Or we can look at other apps that use my Recipes without permission or even give credit. That’s a lot of theft, although plagiarism and not pictures.

Above left: My photo, entitled Evening at a Pond, captured using my Kodachrome 64 Recipe; Above right: that same photo and many more of my pictures posted by someone without permission or credit.

For this article, though, I mostly want to focus on the theft of my photos. If only 2,000 of my pictures have ever been stolen (which is the base minimum, it’s probably a lot more), AI says, “That is a huge number, far beyond what most photographers ever experience. For most photographers, the number of confirmed stolen photos is usually single digits to low dozens over a career. Photographers with big online presences sometimes report dozens, maybe a few hundred images, being misused. But that’s typically the ceiling—and even those numbers are considered very high. From a copyright-lawyer perspective, for 2,000+ confirmed infringements, that volume of theft would be considered: ‘Severe, widespread infringement.’ Most photographers will go their entire lives without reaching even 20 verified infringements, let alone 200… let alone 2,000.”

It could certainly be a lot more than 2,000—it could be as high as 10,000! I would have to dig deeply and spend probably months and months tracking it all down, while ignoring everything else in life. When I asked ChatGPT about that amount of image theft, it replied, “It’s extreme, near-unprecedented, and would put that photographer in the top fraction of a fraction of a percent of most-stolen photographers on Earth. Most photographers with decades of work will never have 10,000 confirmed distinct images stolen—even if they are famous.” I don’t know if it has reached that “extreme, near-unprecedented” level yet, but it’s got to be somewhat close, especially if the “grey area” instances are included, where it may or may not be a copyright infringement, just depending on who you ask.

Potentially being the most stolen from photographer in the world means something. If my photos weren’t worth stealing, they wouldn’t be stolen. Same for the Recipes. I never expected this website to grow as large as it has. I never thought I’d be asked to lead photowalks across the country, or give presentations on photography, or be a speaker at camera events. Just recently a Japanese camera company (who wishes to remain anonymous) asked what my most ideal compact camera would be like, and even paid me for my opinions. If having the “most stolen from” trophy is the price to pay for that, it was worth that price. Obviously, most ideally, I would like the thefts to stop. It does real harm. Some people are making money off of my photos right now, which I’ll never see. We are all people, and we need to act kindly to each other. The “golden rule” that I tell my children constantly is to treat others as you want to be treated. If you don’t want people to steal your work, don’t steal theirs. The truth is that most of the theft happens because some people can’t or won’t create their own stuff, so instead they take it from those who can and do. Sadly, this is just a reality of our current world, and there’s not much anyone can do about it.

10 Fujifilm Recipes for a 1980’s Aesthetic

Posted on November 26 by Ritchie Roesch

*Red Barn* – Ronks, PA – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodachrome 64

Last week I published 10 Fujifilm Recipes for a 1970’s Aesthetic, which I think a number of you appreciated. It seemed to be an especially well-liked article. Thomas H commented, “This theme of a collection using the look of films from a certain era or decade is very inspirational. Somehow for me this approach unlocks the mood of film looks in a more ‘accessible’ way by showing the style of a decade rather than as before showing lots of different looks that are possible with a particular sensor generation.” Well, let’s do it again!

This time we’re going to look at the 1980’s. It will require as to hop into our DeLorean, put Huey Lewis in the tape deck, and hit 88 miles per hour. I was born in 1980—great Scott!—so I have a lot of memories of the decade, especially the latter half, but I was not a photographer yet—not for awhile. I only have family photo albums, vintage magazines, and internet archives to guide the way.

*Outatime* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Royal Gold 400

You’ll notice that the majority of the Recipes below use Classic Chrome, and that’s because Classic Chrome is intended to replicate documentary photography found in photojournalism publications in the ’80’s and ’90’s. Fujifilm looked very closely at Kodachrome and Ektachrome photographs. Because of this, Classic Chrome has a distinct Kodak palette. Kodak dominated film sales during the 1980’s, so it makes sense that this film simulation would dominate Recipes intended to mimic the look of that era.

There’s a lot of Film Simulation Recipes that could potentially give an ’80’s look. The list below is not intended to be comprehensive, nor is it intended to be the “best 10” or a ranking of Recipes. It’s simply 10 that I believe will give you a 1980’s aesthetic, if that’s something you’re looking for.

Kodachrome 64

Kodachrome 64 was the iconic film of the 1980’s. It’s the third (and final) era of Kodachrome, introduced in the mid-1970’s and discontinued in 2009. That means it’s just as much a 1970’s, 1990’s, and 2000’s look as it is a 1980’s; however, it would be wrong to exclude it from this era, in my opinion, so that’s why it’s here. I shot many rolls of Kodachrome 64 in the late-1990’s and early-2000’s. It was a very sad day when Kodak announced its discontinuation. The Recipe linked above is specifically for fifth-generation X-Trans and the latest GFX, there’s also a version for X-Trans IV, the X-T3/X-T30, and X-Trans II.

Urban Dreams

This one might initially seem odd because 1) the Recipe has a weird name and 2) it’s not specifically intended as a 1980’s look. So why is it here? Urban Dreams produces a look somewhat similar to Kodachrome 200, a high-ISO version of Kodachrome introduced in 1986 and discontinued in 2006. It was never as popular as Kodachrome 64 or even Kodachrome 25, but it was certainly a well-used film during the latter half of the 1980’s.

Kodacolor

Probably the most obvious 1980’s Film Simulation Recipe is Kodacolor. Kodak used the Kodacolor name for many different emulsions beginning in 1942 and continuing to today. While not nearly as recognizable as Kodachrome or Tri-X, it’s just as historic, if not more so. In the 1970’s and 1980’s, Kodacolor was the most popular line of color films in the world. Kodacolor II (early in the decade) and Kodacolor VR (beginning in 1982) were common in the 1980’s. This Recipe is reminiscent of Kodacolor VR. The Kodacolor Recipe is for X-Trans III cameras plus the X-T3 and X-T30, but there’s also a version for X-Trans II.

Kodacolor VR

This is similar to the Kodacolor Recipe above, but more resembles Kodacolor VR that’s expired or has been improperly handled.

Kodacolor VR 200

This Recipe, which was created by Thomas Schwab, resembles faded prints captured with Kodacolor VR 200 film. Kodak introduced Kodacolor VR 200 in 1982 and discontinued it in 1986, when it was replaced by Kodacolor VR Plus 200, which was only slightly different.

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak introduced Gold in 1986 as Kodacolor VR-G. They changed the name to Kodacolor Gold in 1988, and it wasn’t until the 1990’s that they dropped the “Kodacolor” name from the packaging. Kodak still makes Gold 200, but the emulsion has been updated many times since 1986. While this Recipe isn’t intended to replicate “Kodacolor VR-G” or “Kodacolor Gold” specifically, it nonetheless produces an aesthetic that can be convincing as a late-1980’s look.

1981 Kodak

The 1981 Kodak Recipe was modeled after some old family pictures found in a photo box. These prints were made in July of 1981—a date stamped on the back—and printed on Kodak paper. The other technical details are unknown, but most likely they were captured with a cheap point-and-shoot of some sort with Kodacolor II film. Due to age and improper storage, the prints are faded, with a pronounced warm cast, and colors overall less vibrant than they once were.

Emulsion ’86

This Recipe produces a picture aesthetic that is reminiscent of photos of Expo ’86, a World’s Fair that was in Vancouver, Canada (interestingly, that was the last World’s Fair in North America). I actually went to it, but only remember a little because I was six-years-old. For some reason, the floating McDonald’s is what I remember the most.

Fujicolor Super HG

Fujifilm introduced Fujicolor Super HG in 1986, and discontinued the film in the 1990’s. This Recipe was invented by Thomas Schwab, and it does an excellent job at replicating the look of Fujicolor film from that era.

Kodak T-Max 100

I didn’t include any B&W films in the 1970’s article, which was a massive oversight on my part. Not wanting to make that same mistake, I made sure to include one in this list. Actually this is two Recipes, both made by Dan Allen: Kodak T-Max 100 Hard Tone and Kodak T-Max 100 Soft Tone. Kodak introduced T-Max in 1986, and it was immediately a huge hit. The film is still manufactured today, so it could just as easily be a 1990’s, 2000’s, 2010’s or 2020’s aesthetic.

Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

SOOC Live Update: new time tomorrow

Posted on November 23 by Ritchie Roesch

Just a quick update about tomorrow’s show: it will now be at 9:00 AM Pacific Time, 12:00 noon Eastern. This is one hour earlier (or 13 hours, if you count my mistake of using PM instead of AM… what an error!). So just to clarify, it will be 9:00 AM Pacific, 10:00 AM Mountain, 11:00 AM Central, and 12:00 noon Eastern. You can find the show on the SOOC Live YouTube channel, or by clicking here. I’ve also included it below. I hope that you can join us! And I apologize for the time mixups and changes.

There’s a Built-In FRGMT B&W Recipe on the Fujifilm GFX100RF??!!

Posted on November 21 by Ritchie Roesch

A couple of days ago I saw that Fujifilm is releasing a limited run special-edition of the GFX100RF, designed by fashion designer, producer, and artist Hiroshi Fujiwara, called the GFX100RF Fragment Edition. It looks pretty much the same as a regular GFX100RF, except with smoother leather and a different engraving on the top plate. There’s also a few accessories, including a strap, lens hood, and more. The GFX100RF Fragment Edition will only be available in Japan. It’s pretty cool, I guess.

I didn’t think much of it until yesterday, when a reader emailed me to take a closer look. Aside from a couple of physical changes, there is one internal change to the camera. The Monochrome Film Simulation was removed, and in its place is a custom black-and-white Recipe called FRGMT BW created by Hiroshi. It’s Acros with “stronger grain, tweaked highlight and shadow tone curves, reduced sharpness, less noise reduction, more clarity, and a bit of positive exposure compensation.” This Recipe, instead of being found in C1-C7, is in the Film Simulation Menu.

This is quite interesting. First, before we let this fact slip by, the Recipe includes an exposure compensation boost, which currently isn’t possible to program. You have to adjust the exposure manually, which makes sense, but Fujifilm just demonstrated that they have the ability to include an exposure adjustment within a Recipe. Is this something we’ll see in the future? Perhaps so. Fujifilm also demonstrated that it’s possible to replace a Film Simulation with a Recipe. Maybe you don’t use PRO Neg. Std or Eterna Bleach Bypass or Sepia—wouldn’t it be nice to replace the ones that you don’t use with a Recipe? Or maybe you replace all of the Film Simulations in the Film Simulation Menu with Recipes? There’s a lot of room for customization, and Fujifilm just showed us that it’s possible for them to do it.

I think this is also an indication of what’s to come regarding the future of the Film Dial or Film Era Dial. I suspect that Fujifilm will open up the Film Dial to allow Recipes for all of the positions, and not just FS1/FS2/FS3 (on the X-E5 and X-T30 III, anyway). I suspect that the Film Era Dial will be hard-set Recipes designed by Fujifilm (or photographers they have partnered with), similar to FRGMT B&W. This is speculation, of course.

*FRGMT BW Recipe — Fujifilm GFX100RF — Photo by Manabu Nakanishi via Fujifilm*

I don’t want to read too much into this. It could be a one-time thing, and we’ll never see anything like this again. Nothing may come of it, other than this one special-edition model sold only in Japan. But it is intriguing to consider what it could possibly mean for future models.

So for those wondering what the FRGMT B&W Recipe is, well, here you go! It’s found on Fujifilm’s webpage for the GFX100RF Fragment Edition.

Film Simulation: Acros
Grain: Strong / Large
Highlight: +4
Shadow: +2
Sharpness: -4
High ISO NR: -4
Clarity: +5
Exposure Compensation: +1/3

Obviously not every setting is included, so let’s take a guess on the blanks. Most likely it is Dynamic Range Auto, White Balance Auto (0R & 0B for the WB Shift), Color Chrome Effect and Color Chrome FX Blue Off, Toning Off (WC 0 MG 0), and ISO up to 12800 (based on one of the sample pictures). So if you’re interested in trying it yourself, you absolutely can. In fact, here are a few of my photos, which look pretty good, reprocessed on my Fujifilm X-E5 using the FRGMT B&W Recipe (choosing DR200 in lieu of DR-Auto).

*FRGMT BW Recipe —* Fujifilm X-E5 — Photo by Ritchie Roesch

Is the X Half the Worst Fujifilm-Related Product of 2025?

Posted on November 20 by Ritchie Roesch

Fujirumors recently conducted a survey of the “best” and “worst” Fujifilm-related gear released in 2025. This included Fujifilm cameras—specifically, the X-E5, X-T30 III, X half, GFX100RF, and GFX Eterna 55—as well as lenses, including third-party lenses. Instax was in the list, too. The survey had two questions: which was the best, and which was the worst. The insinuation in the body of the article was that whatever product was chosen as the “worst” would be considered a flop.

No surprise to me, the Fujifilm X-E5 was ranked as the “best” Fujifilm-related product of 2025, receiving nearly 40% of the votes. It’s an excellent camera that’s been pretty well received. A strong argument can be made that the GFX100RF or Eterna 55 are technically the best, but the majority of those voting are likely not in the GFX system. The X-T30 III will probably end up selling more copies than any of the other cameras, which doesn’t necessarily make it the “best” only the best selling due to having the best value. It’s all subjective.

Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half

The Fujifilm X half far and away received the most votes for “worst” Fujifilm-related product, receiving 50% of the responses. I’m not surprised because the survey was on Fujirumors, and the X half is largely not intended for the market that audience generally is. Just like I’d be shocked if the Instax Mini LiPlay won best product on that site, while it wouldn’t be shocking at all if it did so on an Instax-centric website.

The primary customers of the X half are not those in X-series; it’s those with an Instax camera, those who shoot film on a retro point-and-shoot, those who like digicams, and those who have an interest in photography but have no interest in using a mirrorless or DSLR model. They want film-like results without fuss. I would bet that two-thirds of those who have bought an X half don’t own and have never owned an X-series camera, aside from their new X half. If we were to revisit this in a couple of years, I would wager that the X half was the gateway into the X-series for thousands of people, which is exactly what the purpose of that camera is. Someone buys the X half today, next year they buy an X-T30 III or X100VI or something like that.

Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half

The question, of course, is this: does that make the X half the worst Fujifilm-related product of 2025? If it’s successful at bringing in new customers, particularly an often overlook subset of potential customers, isn’t that good? I don’t know exactly how well the X half is or isn’t selling, especially since those statistics are hard to come by. Apparently, it was the number one selling camera in Japan over the summer, significantly outselling the second most popular. After talking with a few different camera stores, it seems to be doing well, but the camera is not nearly as hot as the X100VI or even the X-E5. I hear that it’s more popular in Asian markets than in Europe or America, so maybe that explains it.

I can tell you this: I have an X half, and it was my most-used camera on an RV roadtrip up the Atlantic coast over the summer. It’s fun for casual snapshots, and was perfect for documenting our journey. My wife and I both use it, and sometimes we fight over it. With that said, it will never replace my X-T5 or X-E5 or X100VI or any other model. It’s not that type of camera. It’s going to give you the “worst” image quality of any current X-series model, but in the best way possible. So maybe it is the worst Fujifilm-related product, but that’s what makes it great. And it’s definitely not a flop, it’s just intended for a different group of people than the usual suspects, which certainly can be a great way to expand market share.

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X half in black:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Nuzira
Fujifilm X half in charcoal:
Amazon, B&H

10 Fujifilm Recipes for a 1970’s Aesthetic

Posted on November 19 by Ritchie Roesch

*Corndog* – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI – 1970’s Summer

After yesterday’s post about a potential “Film Era Dial” coming to a future Fujifilm camera (probably the next X-Pro), I thought I’d showcase some Film Simulation Recipes that produce a look from a specific era: the 1970’s. I might make similar articles for other decades, probably the 1980’s and 1990’s. Today, though, we’re heading back in time to bellbottoms, tie-dye, and disco—a time when color photography was gaining popularity, largely thanks to New American Color photographers like Eggleston, Shore, Meyerowitz, Sternfeld, Misrach, Haas and others.

Most likely, a 1970’s aesthetic on a “Film Era Dial” will be based on the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, which is specifically intended to look like prints from the 1970’s. But, there were a variety of “looks” from that period. Many different Recipes can emulate a ’70’s aesthetic, and not just those that use Nostalgic Neg.. For this article, I’ve handpicked 10 Recipes, which you’ll find below, that produce pictures with similarities to images from that era.

Kodachrome II

There are three distinct eras of Kodachrome, the most iconic film of all time. This Recipe is a facsimile of the second era, which was from 1961 to 1974. In other words, this could also be a 1960’s era aesthetic. The third era, which my Kodachrome 64 Recipe mimics, also could be a 1970’s look, although it’s just as much a 1980’s and 1990’s aesthetic. The Kodachrome II Recipe is more of an early-to-mid ’70’s look. The specific version above is for X-Trans III models; for X-Trans IV click here, and for X-Trans II click here.

Vintage Kodacolor

While not specifically intended as a 1970’s aesthetic, the Vintage Kodacolor Recipe does produce photos that have a similarity to some prints from that era. The Kodacolor II 126 is another to consider for a similar aesthetic.

Old Kodak

Old Kodak is another Recipe that’s not necessarily intended to specifically produce a 1970’s aesthetic, but it’s easy to see that it does. It’s also the most “Nostalgic Neg.”-like of the Recipes in this list that don’t use that film simulation.

Old Ektachrome

This Recipe produces an Ektachrome aesthetic that’s reminiscent of magazine photos from the ’60’s and ’70’s. It’s more of a pre-E6 look, maybe more like E3 or E4, which (like Kodachrome II) makes it an early-to-mid ’70’s aesthetic.

GAF 500

GAF 500 (also sold as Anscochrome 500) was an ultra-high ISO (for the time) slide film introduced in 1967 and discontinued in 1977. While it was never as popular as Kodak films (not even close), it’s still one emulsion that the 1970’s were captured on.

Nostalgic Americana

None of the prior five Film Simulation Recipes use Nostalgic Neg., while Nostalgic Americana and the four below all do. This Recipe was modeled after photographs found in vintage Arizona Highways issues from the ’60’s and ’70’s.

Kodak Vericolor VPS

This Recipe is a late-1970’s and early-1980’s color negative film aesthetic.

1976 Kodak

The 1976 Kodak Recipe was modeled after some of Joel Meyerowitz photographs from the mid-1970’s, especially his pictures from 1976 specifically.

1970’s Summer

This Recipe is a facsimile of New American Color style photographs, and produces a warm summertime vibe.

1971 Kodak

1971 Kodak is a Fuji X Weekly App Patron Early-Access Recipe, which means that only App Patrons have access to it at the moment (eventually it will be available to everyone). It’s modeled after some old family prints of my dad from 1971 and 1972, likely shot on Kodacolor-X film.

Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

Will The Next X-Pro Have a Film Era Dial??

Posted on November 18 by Ritchie Roesch

*Fire, Truck* – Lordsburg, NM – Fujifilm GFX100S II – 1970’s Summer Recipe

Fujirumors just posted today that Fujifilm is working on “a dial that lets you choose an era-inspired look for your images.” This will be for some upcoming camera. It sounds like this new dial might be similar to the Film Dial, except instead of Film Simulations (and Film Simulation Recipes on FS1/FS2/FS3 for the X-E5 & X-T30 III), it will be aesthetics that mimic specific eras of photography, presumably something like 1950’s, 1980’s, etc.. So not a Film Dial, but a Film Era Dial.

My best guess is that this will be on the next X-Pro camera, which Fujifilm is working on. I suspect that this camera will be the next model that Fujifilm announces, and it will come early next year. This is simply the first of many rumors we can expect for the X-Pro4 (I’m predicting that it will be called X-Pro5) over the next few months. This is merely speculation, of course, and I have absolutely zero inside information. I do know that Fujifilm wants to do something unique and unexpected with the next X-Pro (they’ve said so a few times now), and this would certainly qualify as that.

I can only guess how the Film Era Dial might work, but it will likely be similar to the Film Dial on the X-E5. Perhaps it will have nine or ten or eleven “eras” plus an Off position. These eras, which will likely be divided by decades, will probably be similar to Recipes, except designed by Fujifilm and not customizable. In this way it could be more like Advanced Filters, which aren’t customizable—you get what you get—but probably more refined and sophisticated, something you’d definitely want to use (in other words: built-in—but not customizable—Recipes). Maybe it’s also a bit X half-ish, with the idea being that it’s super easy to get great retro-like looks straight-out-of-camera. If that’s all true, I’m disappointed to not have been invited to be a part of the creation process; however, I do trust that Fujifilm will do an excellent job with it.

So what does “Film Eras” look like on Fujifilm cameras? It can be different things, but I do have an idea. For example, Sepia prints were popular in the 1920’s; Faded Monochrome gives a nod to really old B&W prints; Vintage Kodachrome mimics an early version of Kodachrome film; Vintage Agfacolor has a 1950’s look; 1960’s Chrome resembles pictures found in magazines during that era; 1976 Kodak is similar to some Joel Meyerowitz photographs from the mid-’70’s; Kodacolor has a distinct ’80’s vibe; Kodachrome 64 was an extremely popular (and iconic) film in the 1990’s; Fujicolor Superia 800 has a 2000’s disposable-film-camera quality; Kodak Portra 400 v2 mimics a Portra 400 aesthetic, a popular film in the 2010’s; and the new Reala Ace film sim has been called the “negative for the new era” so it makes sense to use a Recipe like Fujicolor Film for the 2020’s. I could make probably four or five unique lists like this that demonstrates “photography through the decades” aesthetics using my different Film Simulation Recipes.

1920’s

*Espresso Yourself* – Layton, UT – Fujifilm X100V – Sepia Recipe

1930’s

*Urban Escape* – SLC, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Faded Monochrome Recipe

1940’s

*Onaqui Horses* – Dugway, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Vintage Kodachrome Recipe

1950’s

*Always Moving Ahead* – Rawlins, WY – Fujifilm X-Pro2 – Vintage Agfacolor Recipe

1960’s

*Bell & Cross* – Tumacacori, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – 1960 Chrome Recipe

1970’s

*Rainbow over Jersey* – Jersey City, NJ – Fujifilm X-T50 – 1976 Kodak Recipe

1980’s

*Jon’s ’80’s Era* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 – Kodacolor Recipe

1990’s

*Red Barn* – Ronks, PA – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodachrome 64 Recipe

2000’s

*Hello, I am at Disneyland* – Anaheim, CA – Fujifilm X100VI – Fujicolor Superia 800 Recipe

2010’s

*Sunset Photography* – Laguna Beach, CA – Fujifilm X100V – Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipe

2020’s

*Saltwater Marsh* – Plymouth, MA – Fujifilm X100VI – Fujicolor Film Recipe

I like the general idea of a Film Era Dial, and if anyone can pull it off it’s Fujifilm. I’ll reserve my full judgement until it is released, presumably on the upcoming X-Pro5 early next year. I don’t anticipate it being perfect; the Film Dial isn’t perfect, but it is good, adding aesthetic versatility if you know how to get the most out of it (tune into SOOC Live this coming Monday, as this will be the topic of our conversation). I wonder if the Film Dial will be unique to fifth-generation cameras, and the Film Era Dial will be unique to sixth-generation models. Time will tell.

If you like the idea of the Film Era Dial, you don’t have to wait for it. Simply program into your C1-C7 Recipes for different decades. I gave you some ideas above; perhaps this could turn into a series of articles. Maybe I can give some specific recommendations for each era. What do you think? Is a Film Era Dial a good idea? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!

Film Simulation Dial — Your New Best Friend?

Posted on November 18 by Ritchie Roesch

***Correction: Note the new times. The show will now be at 9:00 AM Pacific, 12:00 noon Eastern.***

Wow, it’s been 11 months since the last episode of SOOC Live! Time sure does fly. It’s not for lack of trying that so much time has passed; our schedules just didn’t work out for most of 2025. But, as a holiday gift to you, Nathalie Boucry and I will be hosting a live broadcast on Monday, November 24th, at 9:00 AM Pacific Time, 12:00 noon PM Eastern. I really hope you can join us!

In this episode, we’ll be discussing one of Fujifilm’s most controversial features: the Film Dial. We’ll talk about the good and the bad, and—much more importantly—how to get the most out of it. If you own a Fujifilm X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, or X-T30 III, this is a must-watch episode; if you don’t own one of those models, but are curious about the Film Dial, be sure to tune in. I look forward to chatting with you live on November 24th!

In other news, I just released an update to the Fuji X Weekly App on Android, which fixes the bug that the app will crash when tilted vertical (landscape) on some operating system versions. It was a weird bug that I believe may have been introduced on version 14. Basically, some coding that worked flawlessly on earlier versions no longer worked on newer operating systems. Usually when a new OS update is released, it screws something up unexpectedly. Sometimes it’s a little thing that’s not a big deal; other times it’s a major problem. It took some serious troubleshooting to find and fix this particular issue. This was only for Android, and did not affect iPhones. A special “thank you” to those who reported the problem and helped troubleshoot it!

I’m also working on a fairly significant app update that hopefully will be ready next month sometime. I can’t give away the details yet, but I think many of you will really appreciate aspects of it. I’m constantly working on updates to the Fuji X Weekly, Ricoh Recipes, and RitchieCam apps (even though it may not always seem like it)—between the apps and this website, I stay really busy. I have a lot of various things in the air, which I can’t wait to share when the time is right—hopefully some will be sooner than later. Some things may not ever work out, that’s the way it goes sometimes and that’s ok. Anyway, if you have time on Monday, be sure to join Nathalie and I on YouTube, I’m really looking forward to chatting with you!

Fujifilm Found in Unexpected Places

Posted on November 14 by Ritchie Roesch

*Refine* – North Salt Lake, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Urban Vintage Chrome

Most people think of Fujifilm as a camera or film company, but that’s not their main business, and it hasn’t been for awhile now. When film sales collapsed on the early 2000’s, Fujifilm diversified into many different industries: medical, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, tech, and chemicals. While photography is a big part of Fujifilm’s heritage and identity, it is only a small part of their company overall nowadays.

At a recent photowalk, someone asked me if I had seen a large building in Mesa, Arizona, with Fujifilm’s name on the side, and wondered if I knew what it was for. I hadn’t seen it, and I had no idea what it was for. I didn’t think much about it, but then it showed up in my news feed. Curiosity got the better of me, so I did a little research. Fujifilm Electronic Materials in Mesa, is quietly an industrial powerhouse. The facility is not dedicated to film or sensors, but to the ultra-pure chemicals that make modern semiconductors possible. It’s a different side of Fujifilm, one that most photographers never hear about. Yet this plant plays a key role in the digital world.

*Sunset Glow & Salt River* – Mesa, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Astia Azure

Inside the Mesa facility, Fujifilm produces high-purity solvents, developers, cleaning agents, and slurries used by chip fabricators to polish, pattern, and prepare silicon wafers. These aren’t camera-sensor chemicals specifically; they’re the chemicals needed for nearly every chip you can imagine: CPUs, GPUs, memory, mobile processors, automotive controllers, and, yes, even camera sensors (although only indirectly). Fujifilm is one of a couple handful of companies that supply ultra-clean chemistry for chip manufacturing, and one of a few in Arizona.

Fujifilm expanded the Mesa site only a few years ago, and they’re planning to significantly expand again, due to exploding demand for semiconductors. The CHIPS Act, combined with billions of dollars in private investment, has turned Arizona into one of the fastest-growing semiconductor hubs in the world. Intel has a large footprint, including the massive Ocotillo campus in Chandler. TSMC is building multiple fabrication plants in Phoenix, including a huge campus in north Phoenix. Amkor, Microchip, and more are found in the area. All those fabricators need chemicals—lot’s of chemicals—and Fujifilm is scaling up to meet that demand.

*Irrigation Pipe* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Plus-X 125

To me, Arizona seems like an odd choice for chip manufacturing. It’s a desert, which means it’s hot and dry, and water is somewhat scarce. Apparently the reasons why Arizona is booming for this industry are available land, business-friendly environments, stable geology, talent (ASU, UofA, and other universities nearby), and—perhaps counterintuitively—the water situation, which is extremely controlled and can support the ultra-pure water required. The dry climate helps with contamination control, and the lack of natural disasters is apparently a big appeal. What was once a small tech outpost has been growing into a full-blown semiconductor ecosystem. Arizona is apparently a new Silicon Valley.

For photographers, this might feel like a distant subject, yet it’s a big part of the larger Fujifilm story: a diverse and resilient company that would not likely be making cameras today if not for things like high-purity solvent manufacturing for microchips. While we’re out with our X100VI or X-T5, Fujifilm is making the unseen materials that help power the digital world our pictures live in. If you happen to pass by that building in Mesa, Arizona, with Fujifilm’s name on the side, you’ll see a facility that helps to shape the silicon heartbeat of modern technology. It’s another reminder that Fujifilm is bigger than cameras. Sometimes the most important parts of a story happen in places we don’t expect.

Just Learn to Shoot & Edit RAW (say the gatekeepers)

Posted on November 13 by Ritchie Roesch

There’s a frustrating comment I receive every now and then. It’s been going on for years and years—pretty much since I started making Film Simulation Recipes—and it continues to this very day. It goes something like this: “If you just learned to edit RAW, you wouldn’t need Recipes.” It can be said many different ways, but that’s always the gist of it. Sometimes it’s stated a bit nicer with a beating around the bush, and sometimes it’s said more harshly, occasionally with swearing. I’ve even been told once that I’m doing much harm to photography. Someone even threatened me physically, should they ever see me on the streets.

All of that is crazy wild. It’s bananas. Did Edwin Land get this reaction with the Polaroid? Maybe, I don’t know. It just seems like a weird response to someone else’s personal workflow choice. It’s gatekeeping.

*Horsetail Falls from Bridge* – Columbia River Gorge, OR – Fujifilm X100V – Improved Velvia Recipe

Gatekeeping, which says that only photography done the “right” way is correct and all other methods are incorrect, is a big problem. To be clear: there’s no right or wrong way to do photography, only whatever works for you personally. Anybody who says otherwise is flat out wrong, and couldn’t be more wrong. But there are, unfortunately, many people who will tell you that photography must be done a certain way or else it’s less legitimate. There are a several reasons why people gate keep, so let’s look at some.

Photography is deeply personal, and many people tie their identity to how “skilled” they think they are. When someone else succeeds with a different method—shooting JPEGs, iPhone photography, etc.—it threatens the fragile belief that their way is the only legitimate path. It’s a defensive shield: If you do it differently and are successful, then my choices—and hence myself—might be less special.

*Pool Remnant* – Rodanthe, NC – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe

Kind of similarly, people who learn a lot can mistake knowledge for superiority. You’re doing it wrong is a shortcut to feeling important. Unfortunately, this kills community. You see it all over the place in forums and comment sections of many websites. This is also used by trolls, who may think they’re knowledgable while oftentimes being quite ignorant.

Photography has a long, technical history. Many photographers were taught rigid rules, such as shoot RAW, use full frame, manual-mode is the only real mode, rule-of-thirds, sunny 16, and many, many more. These types of rules evolve over decades, but they always seem to exist. They serve a purpose: give structure to those early in their journey; however, over time, these types of rules tend to harden into what some believe to be absolute truths. Instead of guidelines that helped for a time, they become laws that must be followed. But, remember, in art rules are meant to be broken.

*Barn by the Tetons* – Grand Teton NP, WY – Fujifilm X-E1 – RAW edit from 2016

Photography used to be expensive, slow, and technical, which meant that only some people were photographers, and most were not. Now everyone has a camera in their pocket, and everybody’s making pictures. For some, that democratization feels like a loss of status. Gatekeeping is a way of preserving a hierarchy that no longer naturally exists. I’m a real photographer because I do it this way, and you’re not because you don’t. It’s a game of king-of-the-hill, except nobody else is playing.

Some photographers confuse process with vision. They think creativity comes from the mechanical steps—RAW workflow, layers and curves, editing rituals—rather than from seeing the world in a certain way. When someone simplifies the process, it feels like “cheating” to them. In the end, what matters is if the photo fulfills the photographer’s vision, not what specific steps it took to get there.

*McWay Falls View* – Big Sur, CA – Sigma DP2 Merrill – RAW edit from 2014

Gatekeeping in photography is almost always born from fear—fear of losing relevance, fear of being wrong, fear of being overshadowed, fear of loss of control, fear of competition, etc.. Creativity, on the other hand, comes from curiosity, play, and the freedom to break rules—rules that gatekeepers cling to as if they define the medium.

Getting back to the original statement that inspired this post—if I just learned to edit RAW—well, I shot and edited RAW for years. There are several pictures I’ve included in this article from that era of my photography when I did shoot and edit RAW. I know how to do it, I just don’t enjoy it, so I no longer choose to do it. I don’t personally find any fulfillment in sitting at a computer for hours making all sorts of various adjustments to my pictures. After doing it for years, I realized that it’s just not for me. And that’s ok. There’s no right or wrong way to do photography. I don’t feel that my photography suffers from a lack of RAW editing; actually, I feel that the restraint produces a more authentic result, which I’m quite pleased with.

*Red Chairs* – Cambria, CA – Nikon D3300 – RAW edit from 2015

Invariably, someone will drag Ansel Adams into this argument. Adams spent hours in the darkroom developing film and printing enlargements, with masterful dodging and burning. That’s how photography should be done, except now it’s Lightroom and not a darkroom. All of this ignores Adams’ love for Polaroid photography, which he called one-step photography. Typically, the first step is image capture, and the second is image development, but Polaroids only required the first step (hence, one-step photography). Adams wrote, “The effect of one-step processing on both amateur and professional creative photography has been revolutionary.” One of his well-known Yosemite pictures was captured on a Polaroid, and most who view it are unaware. He wrote a whole book about this topic. Using Film Simulation Recipes is a type of one-step photography, and it can indeed be revolutionary.

Anyway, just because someone chooses to shoot JPEGs on their Fujifilm camera with Film Simulation Recipes does not mean they don’t know how to edit a RAW file. And even if they don’t, that doesn’t make them any less of a photographer. It’s not how you arrive at the destination, it’s the destination itself—the photograph—that matters, and whether or not it fulfills the vision of the photographer.

Cinematic, Atmospheric Photographs — Why Fujifilm is so popular right now

Posted on November 12 by Ritchie Roesch

*White Bridge across Pond* – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 & Fujinon 27mm f/2.8 – Pacific Blues Recipe

PetaPixel published an interesting article today entitled The Enduring Desirability of the Fujifilm X-Pro by Jaron Schneider. In the post, Jaron shares that Vogue France published a snippet of an interview with Jisoo from the very popular K-Pop group Blackpink, who discusses the Fujifilm X-Pro3.

Jisoo states, “I bought this camera about three years ago. And the photos came out with a really cinematic, atmospheric look. And the day right after I bought this, the members and I had a magazine photo shoot. So I took photos of all the members that day. Rosé also liked this camera so much that she said, ‘oh, Unni, can I buy this, too?’ Of course! So we have this as our couple camera.”

*Rock ‘n’ Roll Guitar* – White House, TN – Fujifilm X-T5 & Fujinon 56mm f/1.2 – Classic Amber Recipe

Jaron goes on to discuss the X-Pro3 and the importance and influence of the X-Pro line. I want to go a completely different direction. What Jisoo, Rosé, and the rest of Blackpink liked about the camera was (very specifically) the cinematic, atmospheric look of the photographs. Presumably, she’s talking about camera-made JPEGs—probably unedited (or lightly edited) straight-out-of-camera images. I have no idea if the pictures in question were captured with factory-default settings, or if Jisoo and Rosé are using Film Simulation Recipes. It would be such an honor to find out that they are using some of my Recipes!

The “enduring desirability” of the X-Pro3 and all other Fujifilm cameras is partially the classic body design, which is oftentimes unique among all current camera brands; it’s also partially—and just as importantly—the aesthetic quality of the pictures that these cameras produce. There’s something special about the camera-made JPEGs that’s highly desirable—the color and tonal nuance of Fujifilm’s Film Simulations give the images a finished, film-like quality without post-processing. That’s a big reason why Fujifilm cameras are so popular right now.

*Corndog* – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI – 1970’s Summer Recipe

You might say, “So what? Just because some K-Pop singer likes a discontinued camera, that doesn’t mean anything.” I disagree. The influence will be noticeable. I suspect that this will cause not only a spike in sales of used X-Pro3 bodies, but also Fujifilm products in-general, including Fujinon pancake lenses, since the 27mm f/2.8 is seen on the camera in the interview. Vogue France has nearly 11 million followers on Instagram. Blackpink has nearly 60 million. Jisoo and Rosé have over 80 million each. If even just a tiny fraction of their following is influenced to buy a Fujifilm camera, it will be a lot of cameras. Don’t forget, it was two South Korean television shows that helped make Instax popular.

Fujifilm could help themselves capitalize on this. They should share the interview as much as possible on their channels. In the past they have used Mr. Bean in their advertising, so why not Blackpink? Most obviously, they should fast track the next X-Pro model. It’s really too bad there are not brand-new X-Pro units to buy right now. The timing of all this could have been much better if Fujifilm had something for Jisoo fans to buy. Still, I think there will be a notable increase in interest in Fujifilm cameras because of this interview. Fans of the group will want to achieve that same cinematic, atmospheric picture quality in their own photos. And, of course, with Film Simulations and especially Film Simulation Recipes, it’s very easy to do—not just with the X-Pro3, but with any Fujifilm model.

3 Forgotten Fujifilm Cameras Worth Remembering

Posted on November 7 by Ritchie Roesch

With so many exciting cameras released over the last couple of years, it’s easy to forget some of the lesser-successful models from the early days of the X-series. With each new announcement, it seems that Fujifilm has hit-after-hit, and it can seem unthinkable that some of their cameras have been sales disappointments. The latest releases have features and advancements that may make older cameras seem obsolete, but they’re not. And why are they not obsolete? It’s because Fujifilm has infused each generation with its own unique charm. If you especially like that charm, the camera can never be obsolete because you need that camera in order to experience it. These three forgotten Fujifilm cameras are full of charm, and are worth remembering.

Fujifilm XF1

If you’re looking for a compact digicam that fuses vintage charm with capable image quality, the Fujifilm XF1 is an excellent choice. Announced in September of 2012, it put the X-series into your pocket. It featured a 12-megapixel 2/3-inch EXR-CMOS sensor (not X-Trans), which was larger than many compact sensors at that time, and a very useful 25-100mm f/1.8-4.9 zoom lens. The XF1 invited photographers to carry something small while still achieving good image quality.

Two things ultimately made the XF1 flop, and hence forgotten. First, it required a somewhat awkward twist of the lens to power on. Second, it was released at a time when pocket digicams were going out of style, particular thanks to advancements in cellphone cameras. Fujifilm never made a followup. Thanks to a resurgence in digicam popularity, cameras like the XF1 are cool again. In fact, this camera is recently seen in Ballad of a Small Player on Netflix. While the XF1 is a compact digicam, the character is very much Fujifilm—yet it has a unique quality that I haven’t found on any other X-series model. If you want a stylish pocketable camera that delivers enjoyable images with personality, the XF1 is definitely worth considering.

Above: Fujifilm XF1 photographs using the Golden Negative Recipe and Provia/STD Recipe

Fujifilm XQ1

Another pocketable X-series camera similar to the XF1 is the Fujifilm XQ1. Announced one year later in 2013, it has a 12mp 2/3-inch X-Trans II sensor. It also has a 25-100mm f/1.8-4.9 zoom lens. In a lot of ways, the XQ1 is the same as the XF1, but it is notably updated and improved, and feels more refined. The XQ1 was a bigger success than the XF1, but it also came during a time of market declines for its class. One-and-a-half years later Fujifilm released a nearly identical successor: the XQ2. After that, the line was discontinued. If Fujifilm has ever considered resuscitating this series, now would be a great time—people would buy it up in droves.

Above: Fujifilm XQ1 photographs using the Astia Recipe, Lomography Color 100 Recipe, and Cross Process Recipe

Fujifilm X-M1

For an interchangeable-lens APS-C model, the Fujifilm X-M1 deserves a look. Announced in June of 2013, it has a 16mp X-Trans I sensor combined with the X-Processor 2, but scaled back as an entry-level model—yet with some advancements like tilting LCD and WiFi. It was a unique model in the X-series, but sales were sluggish, and it was soon discontinued and forgotten.

If not for the X-M5 released last year, which has been quite popular, the X-M1 might still remain largely lost to time. Nobody expected this camera to ever have a successor—it was a shock! It goes to show that 1) timing is everything and 2) any camera line can be revived at any moment. The X-M1 is still surprisingly decent in 2025 considering it was a low-budget model when it came out more than 12 years ago. I can certainly understand while some still use the X-M1 all these years later.

Above: Fujifilm X-M1 photographs captured using the Vivid Color Recipe, Reminiscent Print Recipe, and Monochrome Recipe

10 Underrated Film Simulation Recipes You Probably Skipped (but should try)

Posted on November 7 by Ritchie Roesch

*Sentinel & Merced* – Yosemite NP, CA – Fujifilm X100V – Vintage Color

Some Film Simulation Recipes are extremely popular. Some are classics. Kodachrome 64, Reggie’s Portra, Vibrant Arizona, Kodak Portra 400 v2, Pacific Blues, and many others, are frequently used by a lot of photographers. But there are some others that just seem to get used a lot less. Website page-view statistics indicate that the 10 Recipes below are less popular, which I think is confirmed by the infrequency that I’ve seen them mentioned on social media. Just because they’re not as popular doesn’t mean they’re not good—in fact, some of them are my personal favorites.

The list below does not represent the least popular Recipes on Fuji X Weekly. A few of them are in the Top 50 (out of more than 400), which puts them in the Top 12%-15% or so. Compared to the most popular, though, they’re overshadowed. The 10 Recipes below are often overlooked, and they deserve a bit more attention. If you’ve not tried them yourself, I invite you to load them into your camera and create some photographs—perhaps one or two of them will become favorites for you, too.

Fujicolor Super HG

The Fujicolor Super HG Recipe was created by Thomas Schwab, who has made many fantastic Recipes, including a few on this list. This Recipe, which uses Classic Negative, resembles an older Fujifilm emulsion from the mid-1980’s through the late-1990’s. While it is very similar to Fujicolor Super HG v2, which was a collaborative effort between myself and Thomas, this v1 isn’t nearly as popular, probably because the v2 Recipe is more versatile (due to its white balance); however, this version is really good, and deserves more attention. Fujicolor Super HG is compatible with most X-Trans IV cameras (X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4 & X-T30 II); for fifth-generation models, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak.

Fujicolor NPS 160 Pulled

Another Recipe by Thomas Schwab, Fujicolor NPS 160 Pulled is simply fantastic for indoor and artificial light situations. It’s been one of my personal favorite Recipes for years. I highly recommend it if you’ve never tried it. This Recipe, which also uses Classic Negative, is compatible with most X-Trans IV cameras (X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, and X-T30 II); for fifth-generation models, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak.

Timeless Negative

For whatever reason, Timeless Negative has been my go-to Film Simulation Recipe for holiday snapshots during November and December. It’s quite versatile, so it can be used in a variety of lighting conditions. This particular version uses Eterna and is for most X-Trans IV cameras (X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, and X-T30 II); for fifth-generation models, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off. There’s a version of Timeless Negative that uses Nostalgic Neg., which is also really good, for those who have X-Trans V cameras.

SantaColor

The SantaColor Recipe, which uses Eterna, is a fun one. It doesn’t always work well, but sometimes it works really well. It’s another Recipe that’s for most X-Trans IV cameras (X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, and X-T30 II). You can use it on fifth-generation models, but just note that it will render slightly different.

Ferrania Solaris FG 400

The Ferrania Solaris FG 400 Recipe is simply Kodak Portra 400 v2 with Eterna Bleach Bypass instead of Classic Chrome. Most Recipes don’t look particularly good when you change the film simulation, but in this case it does. This Recipe is compatible with most X-Trans IV cameras (X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, and X-T30 II); for fifth-generation models, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off.

CineStill 400D v1

Definitely not a Recipe for every subject and situation, but CineStill 400D v1 can produce really striking results sometimes. It’s the only Astia-based Recipe in this list. CineStill 400D v1 is for the X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, and X-T30 III cameras.

Thommy’s Ektachrome

As you might have guessed, this is another Recipe by Thomas Schwab. I find that it works well for both sunny and dreary weather. Thommy’s Ektachrome uses the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, which makes it compatible with fifth-generation cameras.

Kodak Vision3 250D v2

This is an updated version of the Kodak Vision3 250D Recipe, but using Nostalgic Neg. instead of Eterna. This is one of those Recipes that doesn’t always work well, but when it does, it really does! Kodak Vision3 250D v2 is compatible with all fifth-generation models.

Vintage Color

Some of my favorite photographs were created using the Vintage Color Recipe. It’s another one that doesn’t always work well, but when it does, it’s really good. This Recipe, which uses Eterna, is for most X-Trans IV cameras (X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4 & X-T30 II); for fifth-generation models, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak.

1960 Chrome

Last—but far from least—is 1960 Chrome, which uses Eterna Bleach Bypass and has compatibility with fourth and fifth generation models. The aesthetic comes from several photographs in various issues of Arizona Highways magazine from the 1960’s. If you’re looking for a vintage aesthetic, this is a great option.

Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.

AI is Helpful and Harmful to Photography

Posted on November 4 by Ritchie Roesch

I watched a Casey Neistat video yesterday about AI, and it made me wonder how this technology will be helpful and harmful for photography. AI is not going away. Photography isn’t going away, either—at least not anytime soon. What kind of impact will AI have on it? How do we move forward?

Let’s start with the harmful. Below are some quick thoughts on why AI is bad for photography:

Devaluation of human craft. AI images lack human story, skill, and effort, yet still compete with actual photos, diminishing appreciation for what is real. Art requires human effort; fake art is faux-art.
Job displacement. Photographers, photo editors, and even models will—and have already begun to—lose work as AI tools and generative systems become cheaper alternatives to paying people to create real pictures.
Authenticity issues. AI blurs the line between real and artificial, contributing to a distrust in images. Oftentimes, our first thought is: is this AI?
Loss of style. As computers take over what once was individual choices, everyone’s photos will start to look alike. There will be fewer and fewer new aesthetics.
Ethical & copyright concerns. AI has been trained on real works by real people without their consent or compensation. Cases currently being hashed out in courts are likely to determine that companies illegally trained their AI models, but the damage has already been done, and the little guys—that’s you and me—will not get even a penny for it, while Disney and other large companies will get large settlements.
Fundamentals skipped. When cameras and software can do everything for you, technical skills and creativity will become less important and less prevalent.
Cultural & artistic dilution. Photography’s value as a historical and artistic medium will erode when infinite machine-created images overshadow real human moments. AI will increase the total number of consumable images available by leaps and bounds, and non-AI images will be more easily lost in the massive pile of AI slop.
Energy consumption. AI takes a lot of power and resources. By 2030, it’s expected that up to 9% of all electricity generated in the U.S. will go to power AI. That’s shocking!

Now, let’s look at the positive. Below are some quick thoughts on why AI is good for photography:

Powerful tools. AI can be used to remove distractions by handling tedious tasks, freeing photographers to focus on other things. A very smart friend of mine told me once, “I’m not afraid of losing my job to AI; I’m afraid of losing my job to someone who’s better at AI than I am.”
More proficiency. AI can help you do more. What once took a team of people can be done with just one or two.
Accessibility. Photography has never been more approachable for beginners, those less experienced, those without expensive gear, and those lacking technical knowledge. And it’s only going to get easier and easier. Literally, anyone and everyone can be (and is already) a photographer.
Authenticity revolution. As AI images and AI altered photographs become more and more common, the natural response will be a yearning for what’s real. Authenticity will become even more valuable. Unedited digital photos and film photography have been gaining popularity, a trend that will continue to grow and grow as a pushback against AI.

My view is that AI is largely bad, but it can be good. It certainly can’t be ignored. So how do we navigate such treacherous waters? I don’t use AI often, but I use it sometimes. Like with most things, moderation is key. Use AI wisely, and not for everything. Let me share some recent examples of how I used AI.

The most obvious is the image at the top, which isn’t particularly good. It illustrates the topic of this article well enough, though. I was able to generate it in a few seconds with just a few words typed out. A few months back I used AI to animate a small section of my YouTube video to help tell a story. Those are pedestrian uses of the technology, and not anything to get excited over.

Where it really came in handy for me is back at the start of summer. I found a deal on an RV rental. This particular unit needed to be relocated from Miami to Boston, and it needed to get there in two weeks. Anyone willing to do it would get 75% off the rental cost. Driving up the East Coast in an RV is something that my wife and I had talked about doing for a few years, but it just wasn’t practical. Suddenly, this discount was available and we happened to have a hole in our calendar, so it was like fate. Even the airline tickets were surprisingly affordable to Miami and from Boston, especially considering that it was a last-minute purchase. The only problem is that we barely had time to pack, let alone plan an entire trip up the Atlantic coast. So I used AI to plan it for me.

I told it when and where I was starting and ending, and let it choose the whole route, including where to park the RV at night. I made some RV park reservations (AI even provided the websites and phone numbers for that), and soon we were on our flight to Miami. While not perfect, AI did a better job at planning the trip than I could have, and it did it in seconds, where it would have taken me hours and hours. I was surprised and impressed. I would definitely do that again.

In fact, I did do it again, but on a much smaller scale. I visited the Great Smoky Mountains for the first time a few weeks ago, specifically for fall color photography. I wasn’t sure where I should take my camera and what time of day might be best for those locations, so I had AI do that research for me. It was tremendously helpful, and saved me probably an hour or two of research.

*Golden Appalachian Light* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5 – Classic Amber Recipe

When I’m creating new Film Simulation Recipes and I’m researching films stocks, I have used AI to help with the investigation. While AI is great for research, it isn’t always right. Sometimes it gives a wrong answer. Sometimes, if you ask it the same question twice, you’ll get two very different answers. These instances of inaccuracy and inconsistency does call into question if AI is trustworthy at all. It seems to be moderately trustworthy, and requires double-checking its responses for anything remotely important.

Different AI models are better at various tasks than others, but none of them are good at creating Film Simulation Recipes—at least not yet. Initially, AI was quite terrible at this, often giving nonexistent or nonsensical settings. It’s better now, but still quite mediocre. It doesn’t have a good grasp on what the practical consequences are of camera setting adjustments. If you ask it to create the exact same look more than once, you’re sure to get two notably divergent answers. As someone once told me: AI will often give a better answer than a complete novice, but rarely a better answer than an expert. You can see the progress over the last couple of years, and I’m sure there will be continued improvements, but we’re not there yet when it comes to Fujifilm Recipes.

I think that navigating AI requires using it. If you are not at least somewhat comfortable with the technology and proficient at it, you might (as my friend worries) lose your job to someone who is better at it than you are. But moderation is still the key. Use it when it might actually be helpful. Don’t use it for everything. In fact, using it for everything might be to your detriment.

Some recent studies suggest that over-dependence on AI can reduce critical thinking skills, memory, and creativity. It might also make you lazier and feel less motivated. A quick Google search reveals headlines like AI Is Making You Dumber, Yet Another Study Finds that AI is Making Us Dumb, Science Shows AI is Probably Making You Dumber, Studies Prove It: AI Makes Us Dumb, and so many more. The key seems to be how you use it, and clearly less is more.

AI can be a powerful tool, and using it affectively can be a great benefit. It can save you a lot of time and increase productivity. It can help open some doors that might otherwise be impractical to open. But there’s also a negative side to it, and overusing it can have negative side effects on your mental health. It seems tricky to navigate. I think, though, that the technology will become more integrated and more seamless, and soon we’ll be using AI without even realizing it. Perhaps, in a few years, things will get sorted out, and it won’t be such a treacherous path. In the meantime, consider moderation as the safest route through this tricky time—not ignoring AI entirely, and not using it for everything, either.

California Coast in Infrared

Posted on November 3 by Ritchie Roesch

I just uploaded a brand-new video to YouTube. Some of you are probably unaware that there even is a Fuji X Weekly YouTube channel because I post so infrequently to it. This is only my second long-form video this year; last year I had two, and the year before that I uploaded three. Still, somehow, the channel has nearly 18,000 subscribers, and most of my videos top 10,000 views. I’d love to create a lot more long-form video content in the future, but it takes a lot of time that is just so hard to come by right now.

This video was filmed a few months ago. Initially I felt bad that it took so long to get it put together and finished, but then Preston Summorrow posted a video a week or so ago that was filmed back in July. If it was alright for him to have a large gap between start and finish, then it’s alright for me, too. I hope that you enjoy my video—I included it below.

I love infrared photography! It is so much fun. The results are just incredible. I have a handful of Infrared Film Simulation Recipes, and my personal favorite is Aerochrome v2. If you are interested in infrared photography, be sure to check back often to follow my personal journey. I know this is a niche genre that most people have a passing interest in at most, but even if you don’t care to try it yourself (or don’t have the opportunity to try it), maybe you’ll enjoy the photographs nonetheless.

My wife, Amanda, is the one who filmed and edited the video. She’s a lot better at it than I am, and she enjoys the process a lot more than I do. I think she did a great job! If you appreciate the video, be sure to leave a nice comment for Amanda. I know she would be encouraged by your gracious feedback.

Fuji X Weekly App Update

Posted on November 3 by Ritchie Roesch

Over the weekend I released a very small update to the Fuji X Weekly App, for both Apple and Android. This was supposed to be included in a much larger and more significant update (that’s coming soon), but I’m still working on some of the upcoming features and improvements, so I decided to just get this smaller one out now. It fixes a minor bug that most of you probably didn’t notice. It also changes the functionality of something, which I thought deserved an explanation.

The functionality change has to do with Filter by WB and Filter by DR. Prior to this update, both of those Filter options were “choose one” types, which means you picked the one option that you wanted. By request, both of those are now “choose one or more,” which means that you can select as many as you’d like.

The reason why you might wish to select more than one White Balance type is that, perhaps, you want to choose all three of the Auto options (Auto, Auto Ambience, and Auto White). Before you couldn’t do that, and you had to pick only one of the Auto options at a time, but now you can select all three if you want. For Dynamic Range, you can select (say) DR-Auto, DR100, and DR200, and filter out all of the Recipes that use DR400 and DR-P (this seems more helpful for reprocessing RAW files in-camera or with X RAW Studio).

This isn’t a game-changer type update, as it will likely have a minimal impact for most people (if at all). But for some, this will help them out a little. The upcoming update, which I’m hopeful will be ready later this month or maybe early next month, will be much more robust, and will directly help all users, providing an improved experience for everyone.

Classic Amber – Fujifilm X-T5 (X-Trans V) Film Simulation Recipe

Posted on November 1 by Ritchie Roesch

*Golden Appalachian Light* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5 – Classic Amber

I made this Classic Amber Film Simulation Recipe before leaving on my trip to Tennessee last month, with the intention of using it on that adventure. I had in mind a warm and contrasty negative film rendering that would pair well with autumn colors. It turned out that I was a little early for the peak fall display, and only found pops of color here-and-there; however, this Recipe ended up being absolutely perfect for the early morning forest, which was still shadowed despite being past sunrise. I also liked it in some other situations, such as sunrise, daytime, and even for concert photography. It works most ideally in low-contrast situations with cool light. This Recipe can easily be too warm and too contrasty, so it’s not for every subject or situation—you may have to use it cautiously. When it works, it really works; when it doesn’t, it really doesn’t.

I didn’t model this Recipe after any specific film. Interestingly enough, after I returned home I researched what it might be closest to, and I was surprised by what I found. This Classic Amber Recipe seems to be the most similar to Kodak Portra 400 that’s been push processed by one stop, and scanned with a Noritsu. I would add that maybe the use of a warming filter with the film, such as an 81B, might help solidify the similarities. If you Google search “Portra 400 push process” you’ll find a number of examples that are surprisingly similar to this Recipe (but, like with any film, you’ll also find many non-similar examples). If push-processed Kodak Portra 400 (perhaps with a warming filter) is the look you’re after, this Recipe (unintentionally) is a good facsimile of it. In the right situations, it’s easy to love the results.

*Corn Crib* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5 – Classic Amber

The Classic Amber Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with all fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, which are the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, and X-T30 III. It’s also compatible with the GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF. While you can technically use it on some fourth-generation X-Trans cameras (X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, and X-T30 II), it will render slightly different (try it anyway, though, and see if you like the results).

Film Simulation: Classic Negative
Dynamic Range: DR400
Grain Effect: Weak, Large
Color Chrome Effect: Strong
Color Chrome FX Blue: Strong
White Balance: Fluorescent 1, +1 Red & -6 Blue
Highlight: -1.5
Shadow: +2.5
Color: +4
Sharpness: -2
High ISO NR: -4
Clarity: -3
ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400
Exposure Compensation: +2/3 to +1 (typically)

Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Classic Amber Film Simulation Recipe on my Fujifilm X-T5:

*Forest Road 1* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Forest Road 2* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Forest Road 3* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Autumn Flowers* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Autumn Blooms* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Bright Bougainvillea* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5

*Suburban Vines* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5

*Arizona Palm* – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5

*Ober (not Uber)* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Smoky Hill* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Pops of Red* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Smoky Mountains* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Morning Mountain* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Morning Light* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Leaves in the Water* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Leaves on River Rock* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Small Waterfall* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Creek & Waterfall* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Four Trees* – Gatlinburg, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Partially Eaten Leaf* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Cabin* – Great Smokey Mountain NP, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Skating Rink Joy* – Woodstock, GA – Fujifilm X-T5

*Rock ‘n’ Roll Guitar* – White House, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Phil Keaggy* – White House, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

*Space Guitar* – White House, TN – Fujifilm X-T5

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X-T5 in black:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira
Fujifilm X-T5 in silver:
Amazon, B&H, Moment, Nuzira

Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.