Why Do Fujifilm Photographers Love Kodak Film Simulation Recipes So Much?

Red Barn – Ronks, PA – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodachrome 64

Someone recently asked me an interesting question: Why do Fujifilm photographers love Kodak-like Film Simulation Recipes so much? The most popular Recipes on Fuji X Weekly are overwhelmingly those that attempt to replicate Kodak films. Recipes with names like Kodachrome, Portra, Gold, and Tri-X consistently dominate the popularity charts, often by significant margins. In fact, looking at the most popular Recipes of 2026 so far, six of the top seven are Kodak-inspired. That’s quite remarkable when you consider that these are Fujifilm cameras we’re talking about, and Fujifilm has its own rich film heritage, including legendary emulsions like Velvia, Provia, Superia, and Acros. Yet, for whatever reason, most Fujifilm photographers seem drawn to Kodak-like aesthetics. I even once disguised my Fujifilm X-T5 to look like a Kodak camera and only used Kodak-inspired Recipes, which was a fun experiment.

I suspect that nostalgia plays a significant role in answering this question. For generations, Kodak was by far the most popular film brand, especially in the United States. If you’re older than 25, there’s a good chance that at least some of your family pictures were captured on Kodak film. Perhaps your parents used Gold 200 or Ultramax 400 to document birthday parties, summer vacations, Thanksgiving dinner, and Christmas morning. Maybe your grandparents photographed their life on Kodachrome slides. Even if you’ve never personally loaded a roll of Kodak film into a camera, you’ve undoubtedly seen countless Kodak photographs throughout your life. Those colors have become deeply embedded in our collective visual memory. When we think about what film photography should look like, there’s a good chance that we’re imagining something produced by Kodak.

Dry Wash in the Painted Desert – Petrified Forest NP, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Ektachrome E100VS v1

Another possibility is that Kodak simply made some really fantastic films over the decades. Kodachrome was legendary for its distinctive colors, contrast, and archival longevity. Portra became a favorite among professional portrait and wedding photographers for its flattering skin tones and relatively subdued colors. Kodak Gold was an affordable consumer film that delivered warm, vibrant photographs. Tri-X was beloved by generations of photojournalists, street and documentary photographers for its tonality and grain. Each of these films had its own unique characteristics, and each developed a dedicated following. They weren’t necessarily better than their Fujifilm counterparts—that’s a matter of personal preference—but they certainly established themselves as iconic photographic emulsions, and for good reason.

Let’s not overlook the aesthetics of the Recipes themselves. Many Kodak-inspired Recipes produce photographs that strike a balance between realism and nostalgia. Oftentimes they are colorful without necessarily being oversaturated, and warm like a happy memory yet still somehow natural. Of course, that’s a broad generalization, as (for example) the Kodachrome 64, Kodak Vision3 250D, Kodak Gold 200, 1976 Kodak, and Kodak Portra 160 v2 Recipes can look quite a bit different from one another. There’s tremendous variety among the various Recipes that attempt to mimic Kodak film stocks. Nevertheless, many of these aesthetics seem to strike a sweet spot between looking modern and resembling something pulled from an old family photo album. There’s something attractive about how these Recipes make pictures look, which people seem to like.

Pool Remnant – Rodanthe, NC – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Tri-X 400

It would be a mistake, however, to overlook the power of a familiar name. Suppose that I publish two nearly identical Recipes, but name one Kodak Portra 400 and the other something completely unrelated to both Kodak and Portra. Which do you think would receive more attention? I actually did this, and can tell you that the one with both Kodak and Portra in the name is much, much more popular than the one without either, despite the very similar picture aesthetics. People recognize the brand name, and many are specifically searching for those particular film aesthetics. Someone who wants their digital photographs to resemble Portra 400 is much more likely to search for that name than an unfamiliar generic Recipe title. This creates something of a snowball effect: popular Recipes receive more attention, which makes them even more popular. The longstanding success of Kodachrome 64, Reggie’s Portra, and Kodak Portra 400 v2 on Fuji X Weekly might be partially explained by this phenomenon.

There’s also the interesting relationship between Fujifilm’s digital technology and Kodak’s photographic heritage. Because Fujifilm allows photographers to customize their JPEG output to a somewhat extensive degree through Film Simulations, White Balance, Highlight, Shadow, Color Chrome Effect, etc., etc., it’s possible to achieve a tremendous variety of aesthetics without ever opening a RAW editor. Rather ironically, one of the most popular ways to use this technology is to imitate films produced by Fujifilm’s longtime competitor! Classic Chrome, in particular, is an excellent foundation for Kodak-inspired Recipes. It’s the underlying Film Simulation for many of the most popular Recipes, including Kodachrome 64, Reggie’s Portra, Kodak Portra 400 v2, and Kodak Gold 200. In a strange twist of fate, Fujifilm photographers help to keep Kodak’s heritage alive in digital photography.

Muffler Cowboy – Atlanta, IL – Fujifilm X-E5 – Kodak Portra 400 v2

For some reason, Recipes inspired by Fujifilm’s emulsions don’t typically receive the same attention. There are many wonderful Superia, Velvia, Astia, and Provia Recipes available, some that are among my personal favorites. Classic Negative, which was inspired by Fujicolor Superia film, is one of my most loved Film Simulations. Yet, even with the popularity of Classic Negative and the more recent Reala Ace Film Simulation, Kodak-inspired Recipes continue to dominate the charts. I don’t believe that this means Kodak made better photographic films than Fujifilm, as both companies produced some truly excellent emulsions. Back in the film days, Velvia was probably my favorite slide film. Rather, I suspect that Kodak’s particular combination of aesthetic familiarity, nostalgia, and name recognition gives it an advantage that’s difficult to overcome.

Probably most fascinating of all this is that many photographers using these Recipes have never shot the original films. Some weren’t even born until after certain emulsions were discontinued. They’re not necessarily recreating their own memories; instead, they’re embracing photographic aesthetics that feel nostalgic, whether they’ve personally experienced it or not. Maybe that’s the real magic of these Recipes: they allow us to make brand-new photographs that somehow feel like old memories. And, for whatever reason, Kodak-like Recipes seem to do that particularly well.

2 comments

  1. Dave T · 4 Hours Ago

    I shot all the old Kodak film stocks mentioned in this article. I still have Kodachrome and Ektachrome slides in my inventory, many of them of family events from my youth. I have a lot more Kodak slides and negatives in my file than any other maker.

    I always preferred the warm colors of Kodachrome over Ektachrome. I love the tonality and grain structure of both Plus-X and Tri-X and prefer the contrast of both over the Ilford films. I never took up with Tmax. I bought a 100ft roll of Plus-X when I bought my first SLR (Argus-Cosina) at about 20-years old. A friend taught me to develop my film in the university darkroom. I still have my notes from his instruction.

    In my Fujifilm cameras, I often have the K64 and Tri-X recipes loaded and use them often. But, I also use the Velvia and Acros in-camera sims significantly as well. I find the Monochrome sim to be very useful, especially combined with the red filter.

    I was never a Portra fan, but then I do not shoot weddings or many portraits. More often than not, any portrait that I shoot will be in black and white.

    All that said, I really enjoyed your article. It was a fun look into the impact of Kodak’s name at a time when they are no longer the dominant company. That is quite a legacy they created.

    Well done.

  2. Malcolm Hayward · 2 Hours Ago

    Kodak used to be universal for colour. The early Fujifilm we saw was awful.
    Agfa was much used in Europe but for accurate work.
    So, no surprise.

    Monochrome.
    Again in Europe, Agfa and especially Ilford. (Kodak the choice of the press snapper.)
    Ilford always tested as having much finer smoother grain than the equivalent Kodak.
    Always preferred for art work.
    Agfa had very even grain, which gave it specialized technical advantages.

    To summarise, your B&W simms are far too grainy for the European Ilford in Europe.
    Agfa was always nice.
    Ilford colour came good with Ciba-Chrome and some. Not relevant here. Ilfocolour was crap.
    Fujifilm came good, so much more recently.

    Kodachrome for “National Geographic”.
    Kodacolour for the “Common Hoard”.
    Vericolour ubiquitous for social photography.
    Ectachrome when vulgar colour is less appropriate.
    10 x 8 for cookery books. Re-touchable by the rich airbrush man.

    What we all remember. Why shouldn’t Kodak simms dominate.

    Add to this, the fantastically good job, Ilford excepted, you are doing yourself.

    Very best rgds.

Leave a Reply