Fujifilm X100V Film Simulation Recipe: Kodachrome 1

Kodak Blossoms – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X100V – “Kodachrome 1”

Kodachrome
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summer
Makes you think all the world’s a sunny day

Kodachrome is probably the most iconic photographic film ever made. It was legendary, and many people saw the world through its colors. Kodak produced Kodachrome film from 1935 through 2009, when it was suddenly discontinued.

The Kodachrome name has been used for many different films over the years. The first Kodachrome product was a two-glass-plate color negative that was introduced in 1915. Like all other color photography methods of its time, the results weren’t particularly good and the product not especially successful.

Forest Brooks – Fruit Heights, UT – Fujifilm X100V – “Kodachrome 1”

In 1935 Kodak released its next Kodachrome, which was a color transparency film with an ISO of 10. This Kodachrome was the first color film that produced reasonably accurate colors and was the first commercially successful color film. It became the standard film for color photography for a couple decades, and was even Ansel Adams’ preferred choice for color work. The December 1946 issue of Arizona Highways, which was the first all-color magazine in the world, featured Barry Goldwater’s Kodachrome images.

Kodak made significant improvements to Kodachrome, and in 1961 released Kodachrome II. This film boasted more accurate colors, sharper images, finer grain, and a faster ISO of 25. While it was still similar to the previous Kodachrome, it was better in pretty much every way. A year later Kodachrome-X was introduced, which had an ISO of 64.

Another generation of Kodachrome, which came out in 1974, saw Kodachrome II replaced by Kodachrome 25 and Kodachrome-X replaced by Kodachrome 64. The differences between this version and the previous weren’t huge with nearly identical image quality. The biggest change was going from the K-12 to the K-14 development process (which was a little less complex, but still complex). This generation of Kodachrome is what most people think of when they picture (pun intended) the film, gracing the pages of magazines like National Geographic.

CPI – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X100V – “Kodachrome 1”

I personally have shot plenty of Kodachrome, mostly Kodachrome 64. It was a good general use film that produced sharp images and pleasing colors. I haven’t used it in more than a decade. Its days are gone. Even if you can find an old roll of the film, there are no labs in the world that will develop it.

This Kodachrome 1 film simulation recipe is meant to mimic that first era of Kodachrome. This isn’t your parent’s or grandparent’s Kodachrome, it’s your great-grandparent’s. This Kodachrome 1 recipe is actually an updated version of my Vintage Kodachrome recipe. Since the new Fujifilm cameras have more JPEG options, such as Clarity, Color Chrome Effect and Color Chrome Effect Blue, it’s possible to get more accurate or at least different looks out-of-camera. This recipe is very similar to the original version, but I hope this one is just a tad better. It’s only compatible with the X100V, X-Pro3 and X-T4 cameras; if you don’t have one of those cameras, give the Vintage Kodachrome recipe a try. Both the old and this new version have a great vintage analog look that I’m sure many of you will appreciate. I want to give a big “thank you” to Fuji X Weekly reader Thomas Schwab for his help with updating this recipe.

Classic Chrome
Dynamic Range: DR400
Highlight: +4
Shadow: -2
Color: +4
Noise Reduction: -4
Sharpening: -2
Clarity: +1
Grain Effect: Strong, Small
Color Chrome Effect: Strong
Color Chrome Effect Blue: Weak
White Balance: Auto, +2 Red & -4 Blue
ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400
Exposure Compensation: -1/3 to -1 (typically)

Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this Kodachrome 1 film simulation recipe on my Fujifilm X100V:

Reel 2 Reel – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X100V
Behind the Grocery Store – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X100V
American Neighborhood – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X100V
Open Window Blinds – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X100V
Playing Cards – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X100V
Summer Bloom – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X100V
Forest Edge – Fruit Heights, UT – Fujifilm X100V
Dead Tree Trunk – Fruit Heights, UT – Fujifilm X100V
Trees of Life & Death – Fruit Heights, UT – Fujifilm X100V
Sunlight & Leaves – Fruit Heights, UT – Fujifilm X100V

See also: Film Simulation Recipes

This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.

Fujifilm X100V Black    Amazon   B&H
Fujifilm X100V Silver   Amazon   B&H

Fujifilm X100F Review Blog

Help Fuji X Weekly

Nobody pays me to write the content found on fujixweekly.com. There's a real cost to operating and maintaining this site, not to mention all the time that I pour into it. If you appreciated this article, please consider making a one-time gift contribution. Thank you!

$2.00

11 comments

  1. Pingback: Film Simulation Recipe Compatibility: X-Trans IV | Fuji X Weekly
  2. Pingback: What I’ve Been Working On (New Film Simulation Recipes Coming Soon!) | Fuji X Weekly
  3. Daniele · 10 Days Ago

    Hi, I’m completely new to fuji world, I’m thinking about switching to fuji for my personal works (street, travel, moments and generic shots) since I’m particularly interested in film simulation and minimizing post production time. What makes this recipe impossible to use on a Bayer fuji camera? Is it about some parameters missing (like Color Chrome effect, shadows, highlights…)? Why older X Trans can’t reproduce recipes made for latest X Trans sensors?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · 10 Days Ago

      Yes, the Bayer cameras (and older X-Trans) don’t have all of the JPEG options, so you can’t achieve this look exactly. Besides that, with each sensor type/generation, there are some subtle differences in how pictures are rendered, even with identical settings.

      Like

  4. Vladimir · 7 Days Ago

    Ritchie, hello.
    Please tell me the meaning of simultaneous use in the settings:
    Dynamic Range: DR400
    Highlight: +4
    In my opinion, the values of one parameter a are excluded by the other.

    What is your understanding of the interaction of these two settings.

    Sincerely, Vladimir

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · 6 Days Ago

      So I use the Highlight and Shadow setting to set the contrast curve. The DR settings prevent clipped highlights. There’s some overlap in what they do, but it’s not 1:1 the same. For example, try this recipe, except change DR to 200 and Highlight to +3, and then try DR 100 with Highlight set to +2. You’ll notice that it doesn’t produce identical results to DR400 and +4 Highlight. I hope this helps!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Vladimir · 6 Days Ago

        Thanks, Ritchie.
        The logic is clear.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Patrick Vincent Aquino · 5 Days Ago

    Amazing work. Have you tried making a new Cinestill 800T recipe using Classic Negative as a base?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · 5 Days Ago

      I’m in the process of making a new CineStill 800T, but not with Classic Negative (Eterna is the base). Classic Negative has a lot of contrast, but I’ll have to play around with it maybe using DR-Priority Weak or Strong and see how that looks. Great suggestion!

      Like

  6. Michael Grünbeck · 4 Days Ago

    Thank your for your great work Richie! It’s a great addition to the Kodachrome 64 simulation. I have programmed both, as the Kodachrome 1 is a bit more flexible. Are you planning to do a new Ektachrome Simulation for the X100V-generation-sensors?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ritchie Roesch · 18 Hours Ago

      Thanks! Yes, a new Ektachrome recipe is on my to-do list. I appreciate the comment!

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s