St. Anthony’s Feast – Boston, MA – Fujifilm X-T50 – Superia Negative
A common question that I get asked is which Film Simulation Recipes are best for street photography. It’s a popular genre that a lot of people enjoy. I wouldn’t call myself a street photographer per se, but I’ve definitely done it. I dabble in it from time-to-time, but it’s not my primary photographic interest; however, I do believe I have enough experience to give some good suggestions.
With over 400 Fujifilm Recipes on this website and in the Fuji X Weekly App, there are tons of choices. Situationally specific, each one of those 400+ Recipes could be good options for street photography. I want to narrow it down a bit for you, though, by suggesting ten to consider trying. Probably all ten won’t be good options for your style, but perhaps one or maybe a few will be. I’m also skipping over some of the most obvious: Kodachrome 64, Reggie’s Portra, Kodak Portra 400, Kodak Portra 400 v2, and Kodak Gold 200. My assumption is that you have already tried those, or are already aware that those are good options for street photography. Actually, I didn’t choose any Recipes that use Classic Chrome, even though that particular film simulation is by far the most popular by those who use Recipes. This article highlights some Recipes that you might not otherwise consider.
The ten Recipes below are not a comprehensive list, and just because I didn’t include one doesn’t mean it’s not good for street photography. In fact, some that I didn’t list might be better than the ones that I did. Each person has different tastes and styles, so what I suggest might not be the best options for you personally. Feel free to comment below which Film Simulation Recipe—whether in this list or not—is your favorite for street photography. I do think, if you are unsure which to try, at least one of the ten Recipes below will be a good choice for you, and worth trying the next time you are out with your camera in an urban environment.
Yellow Pants, Blue Cart – Los Angeles, CA – Fujifilm X100VI – Appalachian Negative
The Appalachian Negative Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with fifth-generation X-Trans cameras and the newer GFX models. Built on top of the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, it’s produces a warm, amber-washed aesthetic with a distinct retro quality. It has an ability to transform the ordinary into something emotive. It’s good for retaining shadow detail, holding back blown highlights, and infusing everyday moments with a sense of timelessness. This Recipe works best in sunny daylight situations.
The 1976 Kodak Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, and the newer GFX models. It was inspired by the work of Joel Meyerowitz, particularly his mid-1970s street, coastal, small town, and landscape photography. This Recipe uses the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, and combines richly warm colors with strong contrast, producing a vintage analog aesthetic. It’s great for street photography because it brings warmth and depth to mundane moments. Since this Recipe uses Auto White Balance, it works well across a variety of lighting conditions.
Working – Salt Lake City, UT – Fujifilm X-E4 – Kodak Vision3 250D
The Kodak Vision3 250D Film Simulation Recipe is made for X-Trans IV cameras (except the X-T3 and X-T30, which has its own version; there’s also a v2 version for fifth-generation models). It aims to evoke the look of the Kodak Vision3 250D motion picture film as used for still photography. The Eterna film simulation, which has a soft cinematic tonality, is the base; however, this Recipe adds significant contrast, producing a more dramatic aesthetic that still feels film-like. It works best in sunny daylight situations, but can sometimes be good in various light scenarios.
Doggles – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T50 – Nostalgic Americana
The Nostalgic Americana Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with fifth-generation X-Trans cameras and newer GFX models. It draws its inspiration from vintage issues of Arizona Highways magazine from the ’60’s and ’70’s during the American New Color era. This Recipe uses Nostalgic Neg. as its base, and produces a warm yet slightly muted color rendering combined with softened tonality. The result is a distinctly retro rendering that feels sun-warmed and aged. It works especially well for sunny daylight scenes, but can also be good in overcast conditions.
The Eterna Summer Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with “newer” X-Trans IV and all X-Trans V models, plus newer GFX cameras. Specifically, this Recipe, which uses the Eterna film sim., is intended to fit well in a photo series that also contains Classic Chrome-based Recipes. It produces a cinematic aesthetic with warm summertime vibes, and works best in sunny daylight situations.
Dumbo Crowd – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Reala Ace
The Reala Ace Film Simulation Recipe is intended for fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, and can also be used on newer GFX models. It mimics Fujicolor Reala Ace film, but uses Auto White Balance for maximum versatility. Despite the name, it uses Classic Negative and not the new Reala Ace film simulation. It has a 4th-layer Fujicolor negative film aesthetic, and offers a lot of versatility for various light conditions.
Pouring Rain – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T50 – Pacific Blues
The Pacific Blues Film Simulation Recipe is for fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, plus newer GFX models; there’s also a version for X-Trans IV cameras. It uses the Classic Negative film simulation, and was inspired by Lucy Laucht’s Spirit of Summer series, and especially the Positano Blues images. It’s specifically intended for a sunny day at the beach, but it can work well in many other scenarios, including dreary overcast and fog. It’s great for street photography because it can turn everyday scenes into something dramatic without being over-the-top.
Art Mart – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm X100VI – Superia Negative
The Superia Negative Film Simulation Recipe is for fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, plus newer GFX models. It uses the Classic Negative film simulation, and has a similar aesthetic to Fujicolor Superia film. It belongs to the Film Dial Recipe set, which means that the underlying settings work well with all of the different film simulations. This Recipe uses the Auto White Priority White Balance, and is especially versatile.
Friendly Conversation – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T5 – Fujifilm Negative – by Amanda Roesch
The Fujifilm Negative Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with Fujifilm’s fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, plus newer GFX models. It uses the new Reala Ace film sim., and draws inspiration from Fujicolor PRO 160NS film. It feels restrained and natural, but with a distinct analog aesthetic. Because it does so well with skin tone rendering, this Recipe might be the best of these ten options for street portraits. It’s best for sunny daylight situations, but can also do well in a variety of light situations.
Sailer on Sumter – Fort Sumter, SC – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Tri-X 400
The Kodak Tri-X 400 Film Simulation Recipe has compatibility with X-Trans III, IV, and V cameras, plus all GFX models. It uses the Acros film simulation, and is the most popular B&W Recipe on Fuji X Weekly. For some reason, B&W Recipes are not nearly as popular as color. If you have not tried this one, whether for street photography or other situations, now is the time. It’s my personal favorite monochromatic Recipe, and one of my favorites out of all the Recipes.
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
This last Saturday I had a quick adventure to Los Angeles, and it was my first time using my brand-new Fujifilm X-E5. In fact, the picture below, Sky Harbor Tower, was frame 0001. I had plenty of experience with the X-E5 already because Fujifilm had loaned me one shortly after it was announced, but I had to give it back after a couple of weeks. While I’ve had my X-E5 for a week, I didn’t have an opportunity to use it until this trip.
I charged the battery the day before, and set the camera up, programming 11 Recipes into it. The ones I chose for C1-C7 are Kodak Portra 400 v2, Kodak Pro 400, Kodachrome 64, Kodak Tri-X 400, Superia Negative (Film Dial Recipe), Reala Ace, and 1970’s Summer. I set Xpro ’62 as the “Nothing Selected” Recipe in the IQ Menu. On the Film Dial, I programmed Pacific Blues into FS1, Kodak Vericolor VPS into FS2, and 1960 Chrome into FS3. I don’t know if I’ll keep those 11 for awhile or switch some of them out—I’m still deciding—but those are the ones I had available in the camera on this trip. I didn’t use all of them this time around, only five.
The purpose of this trip was to lead a Fujifilm X half photowalk with Samy’s Camera and Fujifilm. If you follow me on Instagram, you’ve already seen the X half pictures. I flew in that morning from Phoenix and flew out of LA that night. It was a quick adventure. I had a lot of fun, and it was great to meet some of you in person and photograph with you.
A lot of times when I travel I take way too much gear with me. I go back-and-forth, actually. I’ll take a ton of gear and feel overwhelmed and burdened by it, so I’ll slim it back to a real minimal kit, but it will slowly get larger and larger and larger over time as I think I might need this or that, then the cycle repeats. I’m at the minimal kit spot right now. The only gear I brought along was the X half and the X-E5 with the 23mm f/2.8 pancake lens, plus one spare battery. Everything else stayed home. This seemed to work out quite well, but I’m sure pretty soon I’ll pack more gear into the bag before heading off on an outing somewhere, and it will once again begin to get bulkier and heavier. I have to remind myself: oftentimes, less is more.
Can – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – 1970’s Summer
Marshaller – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – 1970’s Summer
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Fujifilm has 20 Film Simulations on their latest cameras, and one of my favorites is Nostalgic Negative (also called Nostalgic Neg.). I thought it would be worthwhile to discuss this Film Simulation and compare a few different Recipes. Let’s jump right into this.
Nostalgic Negative is one of Fujifilm’s most recent Film Sims, first appearing in 2021 on the GFX100S, and now found on all of the fifth-generation X-series cameras. Inspired by American New Color photographs of the 1970’s from William Eggleston, Stephen Shore, and Joel Sternfeld (among others), it aims to replicate the look of prints from that era. The result is an aesthetic that feels like a warm memory pulled from your grandparent’s photo album or a shoebox full of old pictures.
Rainbow over Jersey – Jersey City, NJ – Fujifilm X-T50 – 1976 Kodak Recipe
In practice, Nostalgic Neg. sits somewhere between Classic Chrome and Eterna. It carries some of the subtle tonal gentleness of Eterna while achieving a Kodak-esque palette kind of similar to Classic Chrome, but with a unique shadow rendering and warmth. This Film Simulation doesn’t aim for true-to-life results; it’s more like a memory, giving your photos an instant sense of history and emotion.
So far, I’ve published 22 Film Simulation Recipes that use Nostalgic Negative as the base. You can achieve various looks with this Film Sim., and you may not know which one is right for you. I thought it would be a good idea to compare a handful of them directly, which might help you to decide which one(s) to program into your Fujifilm camera. The images below are all camera-made JPEGs from my Fujifilm GFX100S II, reprocessed in-camera using various Recipes, plus one with factory-default settings (no Recipe). I’m considering publishing a whole bunch of similar articles, so let me know if you appreciate this type of comparison.
This last Saturday I taught a class at Nuzira called Fujifilm’s Film Simulations & Fuji X Weekly Recipes — Film-like Photos Without Editing. Overall the class went well; however, for those who couldn’t attend in-person, the first 30 minutes of it did not livestream. I’m not sure what went wrong. But, if you want to catch the last hour, it’s on Nuzira’s YouTube channel. My apologies for the technical trouble.
A request that I had from someone in the class was to share the image that’s at the top of this article, which directly compares Fujifilm’s 20 Film Simulations. The other IQ settings in those photos are factory default (without Recipes). It’s a good way to see how the various Film Sims render the scene differently. If you are not sure what the different Film Simulations do and which ones you might like best, you can probably get a good idea by studying that image.
I don’t have a comparison of Film Simulations with and without Recipes, other than a quick side-by-side from a couple of years ago. It might be worthwhile to do something like that again, but perhaps more robust. With over 400 Recipes, it would be impractical to do all of them, or even most. Still, it might be beneficial to tackle such a project, so that’s something I’ll try to work on. I’m sure it will need to take place over a whole series of articles.
Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Captured with a GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Reala Ace Recipe
While I was at Nuzira, I picked up a Fujifilm X-E5 with the 23mm f/2.8 that I had preordered. I didn’t get my name on the list quick enough to be in the first batch, but (thankfully) the second batch wasn’t far behind. I haven’t set up the camera yet, but I’m hoping I can get to that today. Not unrelated to the previous paragraphs, I plan to write some articles about the X-E5. After all, this is Fujifilm’s very first Recipe camera.
If you are in the Los Angeles area this coming weekend, please join me on a Fujifilm X half photowalk with Samy’s Camera, as part of their 49th Anniversary three-day event. Spaces are limited and won’t likely last long, so be sure to register today! It’s $25 per-person ($27.13 after taxes), but each participant will receive a $25 Samy’s gift card, essentially making it free. Please bring an SD Card so you can take your photos home.
I’ll also be in Minneapolis on September 28th. Details to come, but it’s a don’t-miss kind of event, so if you live in the area, be sure to mark your calendars.
Hillside – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Pro 400
One film can produce many various looks depending on a whole host of factors. How was it shot: overexposed (and by how much), box speed, or underexposed (and by how much)? What gear was used, especially which lens? Were any filters used? What was the exact light situation? How was the film stored and handled? How was it developed, including how fresh were the chemicals, and what was the temperature and pH of the water? If it was printed, how was that handled and what paper was used? If it was scanned, which scanner was used, what were the settings, and what post-processing was done? How are you viewing the photo: print, light table, computer monitor, cellphone screen? There are a thousand factors that can affect the outcome—some a little, some a lot.
Sometimes I’ll get contradicting feedback on a certain Film Simulation Recipe. One person will say, I’ve shot with that film, and the Recipe matches almost exactly; another will say, I’ve shot with that film, and the Recipe is way off. That shouldn’t be surprising for the reasons pointed out in the last paragraph—both statements are probably quite true. There are other factors, of course, that are worth considering. One is called “memory color” (which is often mentioned by Fujifilm), in which we remember a film looking a certain way, but in reality our memory of it is a little off. I’ve experienced this personally, where I thought a certain group of settings looked exactly like some emulsion, but when I actually compared them side-by-side it was not such a close match after all. Which is preferable: memory color accuracy or technical accuracy? There’s no correct answer to that question, but you may prefer one over the other. Another significant factor is that, although Fujifilm does provide a fair amount of tools to customize aesthetics in-camera, there’s only so much that you can do with the options available to achieve a certain look. You can only get so close, and not a 100% match; however, it is surprising how close a Recipe will get sometimes. Also worth mentioning is that digital sensors and silver film behave quite divergently sometimes.
Fujifilm modeled the Classic Chrome Film Simulation after (non-specific) Kodak slide films from the 1980’s and ’90’s. Classic Chrome has some obvious similarities to both Kodachrome and Ektachrome; however, it’s not an exact facsimile of either (think of it more like a fictitious Kodak slide film). It does have a distinct Kodak-esque color palette, so it is a great Film Simulation to build Kodak Recipes on. The Nostalgic Neg. Film Simulation also has a Kodak-like palette, but it is intended to resemble prints from the 1970’s, and not projected slides or scanned film. Eterna and (to a lesser extent) PRO Neg. Std can be modified into Kodak aesthetics; however, they’re not modeled after any Kodak stocks. Circling back to Classic Chrome, I want to emphasize that it is primarily intended to replicate color reversal (slide) film, and not negative film.
Garden Lake – Avondale, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Pro 400
The newest Film Simulation, called Reala Ace, is modeled after color negative film, and most closely resembled Fujicolor PRO 160C. Despite its name, it’s quite obviously inspired by the ISO 160 Fujicolor PRO line of films; basically, it’s a new-and-improved PRO Neg. Film Simulation—a similar yet better iteration of PRO Neg. Std and PRO Neg. Hi (kind of like when Kodak replaced the NC and VC versions of Portra and introduced a new iteration of the films in 2011, except we still have the two PRO Neg. options…). Reala Ace doesn’t have a distinct Kodak palette, but, like PRO Neg. Std, it can be made into a Kodak-like look. The advantage of using Reala Ace instead of Classic Chrome is that it retains that “print film” quality of the Film Simulation.
This new Kodak Pro 400 Recipe came about after some feedback that Reala Ace might be a better foundation for a Kodak Portra 400 look than Classic Chrome. I had previously considered the possibility, but hadn’t put any effort into creating it. So I researched pictures and fiddled with the camera settings. I made a few different versions, which matched some certain examples but were notably off from others. I had to narrow it down to which specific Kodak Portra 400 look I wanted to replicate, and get as close to that as I could, with some compromises. It was definitely a process, and sometimes quite frustrating, but I settled on these settings. One disadvantage of using Reala Ace, obviously, is that, at its core, it’s a Fujicolor look, and sometimes that still comes through. You could think of it as printing Kodak film on Crystal Archive paper instead of Endura or Ektacolor. That’s not what this Recipe mimics, but it is a way to make peace with the issue. Most of these pictures were reprocessed in-camera using this Recipe, and not directly captured with it; however, I do have a bunch of other pictures (that are perhaps “less inspiring”) that were actually captured with the Recipe, but I only included a couple of them.
In the end, I feel that I got close-but-no-cigar. I think, in certain situations with certain subjects and lighting, this Recipe can be quite convincing at mimicking Kodak Portra 400 film. There are pictures in this article that you could put side-by-side with certain Kodak Portra 400 frames, and it would be difficult to distinguish which was the film and which was the Recipe. But there are other images that are so far off that I could not find a matching Portra 400 look (trust me, I tried). So I would say that this Recipe is hit-or-miss, and that’s why I didn’t name it Kodak Portra 400 v3 (although that’s what it’s named in my cameras right now). It’s definitely Portra 400 related. The full name of the film is Kodak Professional Portra 400, so I’m calling this Recipe Kodak Pro 400. There’s also Pro Image 100, another Kodak negative film, and this Recipe by chance isn’t terribly far off from that, either; however, it’s not intended to resemble that emulsion, and isn’t quite as good of a match. Either way, like the other Portra Recipes, how close it is or isn’t depends on which pictures you are looking at.
Walking the Museum Grounds – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Pro 400
I included a lot of sample pictures in this article, which will hopefully help to determine when this Recipe works well and when maybe it’s less than ideal. Like the film, it thrives in daylight, but this might be a better choice than some others in overcast situations. I also included a comparison of this Kodak Pro 400 Recipe with Reggie’s Portra, Kodak Portra 400, and Kodak Portra 400 v2 at the bottom of this article (for Reggie’s Portra and Kodak Portra 400, I set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off). I find it interesting that there are some common settings between this and the Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipe, and also some opposite settings—that’s unintentional, just the way it worked out. Because this Recipe uses Reala Ace, it’s compatible with fifth-generation models, which (as of this writing) are the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. It’s also compatible with the latest GFX cameras: GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF. Those who have been dissatisfied with the Portra 400 Recipes may find that they like this one better; those who love the Portra 400 Recipes might not be convinced that this is an improvement. Personally, I really like it, and I might keep both this and Kodak Portra 400 v2 in my C1-C7, as there are times when one might be preferable over the other.
Film Simulation: Reala Ace Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Strong, Small Color Chrome Effect: Off Color Chrome FX Blue: Strong White Balance: 5200K, +2 Red & -3 Blue Highlight: -2 Shadow: 0 Color: +1 Sharpness: -2 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: -2 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: +1/3 to +1 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Kodak Pro 400 Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-T5 and X100VI:
Birthday Boy – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5
(Not) Riding a Trolley – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
We’re on a Roll – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
AMC – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Electric Sunset – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
California Sunset – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Full Moonrise – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Light, Reflected Light – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Canon Camera – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Sunset in the Mirror – Avondale, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Terminally Waiting – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Warm Wood – Elk, CA- Fujifilm X-T5
Stairs – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Underground Station – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Roundhouse Locomotive – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Shop Interior – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
The Tides – Bodega Bay, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Bodega Bay – Bodega Bay, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Greenwood Cove – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Turquoise Pacific – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Fog over Wild Brush – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Fog Rolling In – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Highway 1 – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Coastal Fog – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Magnolia – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Wet Sidewalk – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Wet Alley – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Red Bull – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Squirrel Box – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
Turn Arrow – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
Corridor – Arlington, VA – Fujifilm X100VI
Gravestones – Arlington, VA – Fujifilm X100VI
Empty Trail – Navarro, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Southwest Sky – Arlington, VA – Fujifilm X100VI
Pilot Paused – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Bus Stop – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
Box Truck – South San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
Jackpot – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Bike, Parking – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Blue Car – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
99 – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
No Parking, unless it’s an RV – Fort Bragg, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
Tall Saguaro – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Comparison
Kodak Pro 400 Recipe
Reggie’s Portra Recipe
Kodak Portra 400 Recipe
Kodak Portra 400 v2
Kodak Pro 400 Recipe
Reggie’s Portra Recipe
Kodak Portra 400 Recipe
Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipe
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Red Coast – Fort Bragg, CA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – This new Aerochrome v2 Recipe
Last year, I started my infrared photography journey when I purchased a Fujifilm X-T4 ES full-spectrum IR camera. Since then, I’ve published seven infrared Film Simulation Recipes for the X-T4 ES, which can also be used on full-spectrum converted X-Trans IV (except the X-T3 & X-T30) and X-Trans V cameras. You must have a full-spectrum model to use these Recipes, which requires an expensive and invasive procedure from a third-party vendor; otherwise, the X-T4 ES (“Extended Spectrum”) is a full-spectrum camera briefly offered by Fujifilm to the general public (it’s very difficult to find, but in my opinion totally worth owning). If you have a “normal” (non-converted) camera, these Recipes will not work.
One camera that people have commonly converted (as common as it gets, anyway) is the Fujifilm X-T3. While the X-T3 is X-Trans IV, it has JPEG options more similar to X-Trans III—it’s missing some that are available on later X-Trans IV models. Because of this, my seven infrared Recipes won’t work on a full-spectrum converted X-T3 or X-T30. Dan Allan has a full-spectrum X-T3, and he really wanted to use my Aerochrome v2 Recipe, so he modified it to be compatible with his camera. It’s not 100% the same, but pretty close, and quite nice. Those with a full-spectrum converted X-T3 or X-T30 can now join the infrared Recipe fun!
Above Left: Original Fujifilm X-T4 ES Aerochrome v2 Recipe; Above Right: This new Aerochrome v2 Recipe for the X-T3/X-T30.
Dan was kind to share his modification with me (and all of you), and also allowed me to publish his wonderful photos in this article, which you’ll find below (thank you, Dan!). If you have an X-Trans III full-spectrum model, this Recipe will work by ignoring Color Chrome Effect, but it will render a little different (feel free to try, though). If you have a Fujifilm X-T4 ES—or an X-Trans IV (other than the X-T3 & X-T30) or X-Trans V camera that has been full-spectrum modified—this Recipe will work by choosing Grain size Small, Color Chrome FX Blue set to Off, and Clarity set to 0. Depending on your preferences, you might actually like this version a bit better. The blue sky is the most obvious difference (interestingly, it seems slightly less divergent in Dan’s pictures than in the set above), but there are other more subtle variances; however, the overall vibe is the same between the original Aerochrome V2 Recipe and the new version. This Recipe requires three filters: Kolari Vision IR Chrome filter, Hoya G(XO) Yellow-Green filter and Tiffen Yellow 2 #8 filter. The IR Chrome filter is intended for infrared photography, while the Yellow-Green and Yellow filters are for B&W film. I’m not sure if the order matters, but I have the Yellow filter first (closest to the lens), the IR Chrome next, and the Yellow-Green last (furthest from the lens).
Edit: Dan informed me that he has the IR Chrome filter first (closest to the lens), followed by the G(XO), and then the Yellow 2 #8 (furthest from the lens). He isn’t sure if the order matters, but it might. He also wanted to mention that his conversion was with Kolari, with their anti-reflection glass, which might have a minimal impact on the outcome vs the X-T4 ES.
Filters: Kolari Vision IR Chrome, Hoya G(XO) Yellow-Green & Tiffen Yellow 2 #8 Film Simulation: Velvia Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Strong Color Chrome Effect: Strong White Balance: 5000K, +7 Red & +7 Blue Highlight: +2 Shadow: 0 Color: +4 Sharpness: 0 High ISO NR: -4 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: 0 to +2/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured by Dan Allen using this Aerochrome v2 Film Simulation Recipe on his full-spectrum converted Fujifilm X-T3:
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
A reader messaged me recently with a confession: while camera shopping the other day, the top factor wasn’t megapixels, ergonomics, battery life, AF speed, size, or any other spec sheet headline. It was how the JPEGs look straight-out-of-camera—the aesthetics of the pictures—and how easy or difficult it is to get that look. Five years ago that might have sounded odd. Today it’s normal.
Fujifilm grasped years ago that “look” is a feature, not a garnish. Their Film Simulations aren’t just color presets; they’re carefully engineered tonal behaviors—contrast, colors, hues—that feel intentional, and are cohesive across the lineup. Fujifilm used their vast experience with film to create their Film Simulations, which is why their camera-made JPEGs are so good. Photographers talk about “Fuji color” like it’s a place you can visit, not just a slider position in a photo editor.
Coastal Mist – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5 – Velvia Film
Film Simulation Recipes fine-tune those Film Simulations into aesthetics that oftentimes replicate classic film stocks. By adjusting the various JPEG settings, you can achieve many different looks straight-out-of-camera: Kodachrome 64, Kodak Gold 200, Fujicolor Superia 100—these are just a few examples. I’ve published over 400 Film Simulation Recipes, found on this website and in the Fuji X Weekly App. Most likely there’s a Recipe that matches your style. As my newest catchphrase says: Shoot more, edit less, and let your camera be your darkroom.
Fujifilm makes it easy to achieve a lot of great (often analog-like) looks. You can reduce or even eliminate post-processing, which saves a lot of time (and quite literally changed my life—no hyperbole). A computer is no longer required. While Fujifilm is head-and-shoulders above the competition when it comes to in-camera JPEG processing, there are other brands that are also good, and worth considering. Ricoh GR cameras, for example, are capable of some excellent straight-out-of-camera looks. There are Nikon Recipes, and Panasonic has LUTs. Leica added a few more profiles, and Sony recently added two more FL (“Film Look”) options. Each has advantages and disadvantages.
Fujifilm is clearly in the lead, but since other brands have taken notice, they shouldn’t feel too comfortable. They need to continue to innovate, with more in-camera looks, more customization, but also more simplicity. Remember: our friend was just as interested in the ease of achieving looks as much as the looks themselves, and to an extent some of the competition actually has a leg up on Fujifilm. It’s easy to overlook the importance of simplicity, but it’s just as critical as robustness—those might seem like contradictory terms, but they’re not.
White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues
There’s another aspect to all of this that needs to be discussed, and that’s the point of diminishing returns. Eventually, spec increases mean less and less. At some point, a camera is more than fast enough, and speed increases are unimportant to most people. The megapixels are more than enough, and increases in resolution are meaningless to the majority of customers. Etc., etc.. There might even be negative side effects to these improvements, which could make them seem regressive to some. This is known as the Inverted U Curve. I think a lot of aspects of digital camera technology are nearing (or have already reached or even surpassed) the peak of the curve, which means that they’ll be less effective as marketing ploys. This provides the opportunity for other things that have traditionally been ignored to take center stage. This is why more and more, the JPEG output is a deciding factor—and in some cases, the deciding factor—in new camera purchases.
If you catch yourself picking a camera because you love how it renders the world, don’t feel silly. That’s not laziness; it’s clarity. It’s normal. Specs used to be the destination; today, for many, they’re just the road—the destination is the look. With Fujifilm’s Film Simulations and my Film Simulation Recipes, it’s never been easier to reach your destination.
I’m really excited, because I just published my first YouTube video in over a year! You might not be aware that Fuji X Weekly has a YouTube channel, but it does. I published two videos (not including Shorts) in 2024 (here and here), and three in 2023 (here, here and here). Those were a lot of fun, but YouTube videos are so much work. They take hours and hours and hours to create from start-to-finish. A good estimation—for those channels without a team of people—is one or two (or sometimes more) hours of editing for every minute of video published. That’s not including the time it takes to record the clips.
The video that just went live is a roadtrip to the Mission San Xavier del Bac in Tucson. This is the oldest still-used building in Arizona, and the oldest church. It’s where the city started (even though now it’s a little outside of town). The mission is a popular location for photography, and even Ansel Adams photographed it. I used 11 different Film Simulation Recipes on a Fujifilm X-E5. The adventure gets a bit wild, so hang onto your proverbial hats. I’ve included the video below—be sure to watch!
We tried a little different style for this new video. It’s a bit more relaxed, but hopefully entertaining. It gets a bit silly at times. Amanda (my wife) filmed it all using her Fujifilm X-S20 and Fujinon 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 lens and an upcoming Recipe for video (look for more details on that in the near-ish future). She also did almost all of the editing. There were some technical difficulties; hopefully a new mic will help alleviate some of the issues on future projects. This is also the longest video we’ve ever published, nearly three times longer than the previous longest. A big hurray for Amanda and all the work she put into it!
Even though I have published videos very infrequently over the last few years, the channel has (surprisingly) grown and grown. There are over 17,000 subscribers currently. Four of the last five videos have over 10,000 views, and two have over 16,000. That’s not bad for a barely-there channel. My hope with this new upload is to kick-off a restart of sorts. While I can’t promise anything, my goal is to publish new videos regularly, and not let so much time pass between them. But, in the meantime, I hope that you enjoy this one.
Old Church – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Classic B&W
I love black-and-white photography. Kodak Tri-X 400 is my favorite monochromatic option, and (unsurprisingly) it’s by far the most popular B&W Recipe. For whatever reason, color Film Simulation Recipes tend to be a lot more popular than monochrome, so there are quite a few more of them; however, I really enjoy publishing a good B&W Recipe, and I’m quite excited about this one in particular. It’s really good, in my humble opinion.
The story behind this Classic B&W Recipe is unusual. While leading a photowalk in Manitou Springs, Colorado, with Mike’s Camera, someone asked me to explain the process of creating a Recipe. So I walked him through the process right there in Manitou Springs on a Fujifilm X-E5, and created this JPEG settings combo while doing so. I remember thinking that it looked nice, but pretty much forgot about it until after I returned home and reviewed the photos. After using it a little more, it quickly became one of my favorite B&W Recipes. Kodak Tri-X 400 still ranks a little higher in my book, but this one is easily a Top 5 for me.
Coffee – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Classic B&W
While I only used this Classic B&W Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5 and X100VI, it is fully compatible with X-Trans IV (except the X-T3 and X-T30) and X-Trans V cameras. For those keeping score, that’s (as of this writing) the X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. You can also use this on the latest GFX cameras, including the GFX100S, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF. For the Fujifilm X-T3, X-T30, and X-Trans III models, consider trying the Analog Monochrome Recipe, which isn’t too dissimilar.
Film Simulation: Acros+G Monochromatic Color (Toning): WC 0 & MG 0 (Off) Dynamic Range: DR200 Grain Effect: Strong, Large Color Chrome Effect: Off Color Chrome FX Blue: Off White Balance: Incandescent, -9 Red & +9 Blue Highlight: +3 Shadow: +4 Sharpness: +1 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: +3 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 12800 Exposure Compensation: 0 to +2/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Classic B&W Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5 and X100VI:
Monochrome Umbrella – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Empty Chair in a Dark Room – Litchfield Park, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Lonely Chair – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Hanging Shadows – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Grey Odadiuc – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Shadow Abstract – Litchfield Park, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Suburban Palm Shadow – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Coffee Cups – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
In the Raw – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Facing North – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Horse on a Ledge – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Baldwin 2 – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Mission Church – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Fujifilm recently loaned me an X-E5 to try out for a week or so. I also got to play with one at the B&H BILD Expo last month, so I was already a bit familiar with the camera before it arrived in the mail. Included with the X-E5 was the brand-new Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 pancake lens, so I’ll also be discussing that in this review, too. Let’s dive right in!
The Fujifilm X-E5 is actually the sixth X-E camera. The X-E1, released in 2012, was the very first, and the third X-series model overall, with only the X100 and X-Pro1 predating it. The X-E2 came out only one year later, followed by the nearly identical X-E2s in 2016. A year after that, Fujifilm released the X-E3, which saw the first significant design change (although it was still pretty similar). The X-E4 came out in 2021, which was the most different, with an emphasis on minimalism, compactness, and affordability; however, it was still similar overall. We have another significant design change with the X-E5, yet it still retains the distinctive look of an X-E series model.
With the X-E5, Fujifilm quite noticeably improved the construction quality—for example, the top plate is a single piece of machined aluminum, and the camera seems less plasticky overall. It just feels more sturdy, more premium, more refined than the X-E4. With a pancake lens attached—like the new 23mm f/2.8—the camera closely resembles an X100VI, which was clearly intentional. The X-E5 is essentially an interchangeable-lens X100VI; for those who have asked for such a camera: here it is! The two models aren’t exactly the same, and they each have their advantages and disadvantages, but they’re certainly similar enough to justify the comparison.
I don’t want to dive too deeply into the specs, but some important notes are that the X-E5 has the same 40-megapixel X-Trans V sensor and processor as the X100VI, X-T50, and X-T5. Like those models, the X-E5 also has IBIS. This is a camera capable of capturing high quality photos and videos. Not surprising, the X-E5 is also much more expensive—plus a tad larger and heavier—than its predecessor.
Like the X-T50 and X-M5, the X-E5 has a Film Dial, although it’s implemented a bit differently. Instead of a knob, it’s a wheel on the back, with a little window on the top plate. This is a really cool design; however, there is a downside: it has fewer Film Simulations. The X-T50 and X-M5 have only eight of the 20 Film Sims on the knob, with three customizable slots for your favorites that were left out; the X-E5 has only six Film Simulations, with three customizable slots. The six Film Sims on the dial are Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, and Acros. Somehow—shockingly and inexplicably—Classic Negative was left out, as was Nostalgic Negative. I know that not all of them could make the cut, but I definitely question why Classic Negative was not included—seems like a sin.
The three customizable slots—called FS1, FS2, and FS3—can be set to any Film Simulation. In addition to that, they can also be customized into Film Simulation Recipes (functionality that should be—and hopefully will be—brought to the X-T50 and X-M5 via a firmware update). This is the very first time that Fujifilm has used the term “Recipe” in a camera—amazing! You can have 11 different Recipes programmed into the X-E5: seven within the C1-C7 Custom Settings presets, one in the IQ Menu set, and three on the Film Dial. The Film Dial also works well with my Universal Negative and Film Dial Recipes, providing extra aesthetic versatility. Only the C1-C7 Recipes can be custom named, so you have to remember what the other four are.
While this is certainly a welcome evolution of this feature, it could be made even better. For example, all of the Film Simulations should have the option for Recipes, and not just FS1/FS2/FS3. One issue with this UI, though, is that Recipes are scattered: some in Custom Settings presets, some on the Film Dial, and one in the IQ Menu. I think, more ideally, you’d find them all in one place. A lot of Fujifilm users would appreciate a Custom Settings Dial instead of a Film Dial, with maybe C1-C9 or C1-C12 (more is better). There are a lot of different ways that this could be addressed, and it’s something that should be addressed for future models. Still, the opportunity to have three extra Recipes programmed into the camera at any one time is quite nice, and I’m thankful for it. This is the main reason why I preordered this camera, even though I own an X-E4 that I really like.
Included with the X-E5 was the new Fujinon XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR pancake. This lens is very similar to the Fujinon 27mm f/2.8 R WR, which happens to be one of my absolute favorite lenses. I’ve been saying for years that Fujifilm should have more pancake lenses in their lineup, since a major selling point of Fujifilm cameras are their compact size and minimal weight. A camera like the X-E5 paired with a handful of tiny pancakes is ideal for traveling. This particular camera and lens combo is especially great for everyday walk-around photography.
The lens is sharp with minimal flaws. It has great close-focus capabilities; it’s not a macro-lens by any means, but with 40mp to crop from, it’s possible to use it for near-macro photography. From a technical point-of-view (and mind you, I didn’t do any serious testing), it’s pretty darn good for what it is, a marvel of engineering; from an artistic point-of-view, it seems to lack a little of the magic (a.k.a. character) that the 27mm f/2.8 and 23mm f/2 lenses are known for. Like the 27mm, it isn’t the quietest Fujinon lens. If you are trying to decide between the 23mm f/2.8 and the 27mm f/2.8, that’s going to be a tough call—personally, I like the 27mm just a bit more; however, the close-focus capabilities of the 23mm is certainly a significant plus. If you are trying to decide between the 23mm f/2.8 and 23mm f/2, that’s also going to be difficult, and your decision might come down to just how small is small enough for you. If you are buying the Fujifilm X-E5, it seems like an easy choice to get it bundled with the 23mm f/2.8, since it’s only $200 more when the lens itself is $500—if you have no intentions of keeping it, just turn around and sell it for $450, which makes the camera more affordable.
Ants & Funyun – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Kodachrome 64
Getting back to the X-E5, the camera has a couple of really cool features, but you can only use one of them, and not both. The first, which is borrowed from the GFX100RF, is called Surround View Mode. It allows you to see outside of the frame when using an aspect ratio other than 3:2, giving a faux optical viewfinder experience (sort of). This is particularly nice when using the 1:1 aspect ratio. The XPan ratio would have been a great addition, but (sadly) it’s still missing on X-series models. The second feature is called Classic Display Mode, which turns the EVF into a really cool retro 1980’s-inspired display. I like both, but I couldn’t figure out how to activate the Classic Display Mode for some time—eventually I asked a Fujifilm tech rep for help. As it turns out, if Surround View Mode is activated, even when using the 3:2 aspect ratio, Classic Display Mode is disabled (and vice versa). Fujifilm: I suggest that Surround View Mode be automatically disabled when in the 3:2 aspect ratio, so that Classic Display Mode can be used; when changing aspect ratios to anything other than 3:2, if Surround View is activated, it would automatically disable Classic Display. This way, you don’t have to jump through hoops to use both of these cool new features.
While the X-E4 saw a lot of buttons removed in the name of minimalism, Fujifilm gave them to the X-E5 in spades. Just the new front control lever alone allows for five customizable functions. The inclusion of the rear command wheel and M/C/S switch means that you shouldn’t be short of camera controls, no matter how many functions you need quick access to. Those who disliked the direction of the X-E4 should especially appreciate its successor.
What else can I tell you about the Fujifilm X-E5? It isn’t weather-sealed (although it seems to have some level of weather resistance—I wouldn’t put it under a faucet, though). It uses the “old” NP-W126S battery. I expected that, as those things would have increased the size, weight, and cost even more. The X-E5 is definitely more premium than previous X-E cameras. I had suggested that Fujifilm prioritize size, weight, and cost by keeping it nearly the same as the X-E4; however, my opinion was clearly in the minority. Most people asked for an interchangeable-lens X100VI, and the X-E5 is as close to that as you’re likely ever going to get. It’s a very nice camera.
It comes with a “nice” price tag, too. In America, it’s $1,700 for the body-only, and $1,900 when bundled with the new 23mm pancake lens. That’s pretty shocking, especially when it’s double the price of the X-E4; however, keep in mind that inflation and tariffs have impacted the price in addition to the more expensive components that Fujifilm used in the camera. Interestingly enough, the X-E1 was $999 in 2012, which is about $1,400 in today’s dollars; add to that tariffs, and you’ve pretty much got the X-E5 price tag, never mind the 40mp sensor, IBIS, and better build quality. While it seems expensive, it is not an entry-level model. And with Fujifilm raising the price (in America) of the X100VI to $1,800, the X-T50 to $1,600, the X-T5 to $1,900, the MSRP of the X-E5 makes a little more sense. I do think it’s worthwhile to buy at $1,700, which is why I have it preordered bundled with the 23mm f/2.8 lens.
Mission San Xavier del Bac – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Kodak Vericolor VPS
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Savannah Central 7069 – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI – Retro Color
When Fujifilm released the X half last month, it included some brand-new filters, including Light Leak, Expired Film, Halation, and many more. One of my personal favorites is called Retro. Fujifilm doesn’t say exactly what the Retro Filter is supposed to resemble, but it’s an obvious vintage aesthetic. It reminds me a bit of Ormond Gigli’s color work of the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, although I’m sure the similarities are coincidental. I do think the filter was inspired by 1960’s era Ektachrome, especially when push-processed, something Kodak began offering in 1968.
The one and only X-series camera that has the Retro Filter is the X half. You won’t find it on the X100VI or X-E5 or any other model; however, it is on Instax Evo cameras. This filter, plus a number of others on the X half, were inherited from the Instax department. In my opinion, Fujifilm should add the Retro and Expired Film Filters to the Advanced Filters section of X-series cameras. Light Leak and Halation should be added as JPEG options that can be applied to Film Simulation Recipes. I hope they do.
Above: Retro Filter on the Fujifilm X half
While the Retro Filter on the X half was the initial inspiration for this new Recipe, I leaned more heavily into a different (yet similar) picture aesthetic that I really like: the Retro Style Smart Filter on my Samsung ST76 digicam. This little pocket point-and-shoot is from 2012, and it’s not particularly great, but I really like the Retro Style Smart Filter on it, which is pretty much the only reason why I use that old digicam. The filter is intended to produce a vintage ’60’s and ’70’s look, although (again) the specifics aren’t identified. While it has some similarities to the Retro Filter on the X half, it is notably divergent—a bit softer, less bold, and more subtle (yet still pronounced). To me, it looks more like prints from that era, more so than push-processed slides.
I did consider both of these picture aesthetics when created this Retro Color Film Simulation Recipe, but I spent more time comparing my X100VI and X-E5 photos to the Samsung ST76 than the X half. That was the vibe that I wanted to emulate, more so than the X half images. I think this Recipe nails the look in certain situations, and is pretty close (but not perfectly matched) in others. I’m pretty satisfied with the end result.
Above: Retro Style Smart Filter on a Samsung ST76
You might ask why I replicated the Retro look from a cheap digicam over the Retro look from the X half. Initially, I was attempting to replicate the X half aesthetic, but I encountered some difficulties early in that process. If I kept at it, perhaps those things could have been overcome. My hope is that Fujifilm brings the Retro Filter to X-series cameras, which might make the Recipe obsolete if I made it. Aside from that, while the Retro aesthetic from the Samsung ST76 and Fujifilm X half both have their positive and unique characteristics, overall I prefer Samsung’s version, as Fujifilm’s can be a little too strong sometimes for my tastes. I like both, and they’re both somewhat similar, but the one that I like best is what I ended up mimicking.
This Recipe produces an aesthetic reminiscent of some photo prints from the 1960’s and ’70’s, maybe captured using Ektachrome X or Ektachrome 200. I did find a few examples of Ektachrome prints from the 1970’s (for example, this one), which aren’t terribly dissimilar, and maybe sit halfway in-between the Retro Color Film Simulation Recipe and the X half‘s Retro Filter. As with anything in film photography, there are a lot of variables that can significantly affect the outcome. I would say that it is the “general aesthetic” that the Recipe recreates more so than a specific film or process.
Triton – Tonopah, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Retro Color
This Retro Color Recipe looks great on sunny days, and can be especially nice during golden hour. Try both a slight underexposure and overexposure—the results are notably different, and you might prefer one over the other. It produces a certain look with overcast sky, which you could either love or hate (most people probably won’t like it). I would avoid this for nighttime situations, but early blue hour is fine. This Recipe wouldn’t be my first choice for portrait photography, although situationally specific, it might be ok for that. If you appreciate a warm, vintage aesthetic, give the Retro Color Recipe a try, as you might really like it.
This is a Patron Early-Access Recipe. If you are a Fuji X Weekly App Patron, you have access to it right now. If not, no worries, as it will eventually be made available to everyone, once it is replaced by a new Early-Access Recipe. It is compatible with all fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, which (as of this writing) are the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. It can also be used on the latest GFX models, including the GFX100 II, GFX100S II and GFX100RF.
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this Retro Color Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X100VI and X-E5:
7 Eleven – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Dusty Steering Wheel – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Sparkless Plug – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Eye Closed – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Inspection – Arlington National Cemetery, VA – Fujifilm X100VI
The Porter Machine – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
2715 – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Mission Arch – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Storm over Mission San Xavier – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Treasury Department – Washington, DC – Fujifilm X100VI
Big Flag – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Bashas on Main Street – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Vacancy at the Motor Hotel – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Afternoon Palm – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Craftsman – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Bougainvillea Sunset – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Tire Pile – Waddell, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Fireplace – Scottsdale, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Fading Sunset – Somewhere over Arizona (I think) – Fujifilm X100VI
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and 400 more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Small Clouds Above the Roof – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 – Pro Neg Recipe
I worked on this Film Simulation Recipe for some time. It wen’t through a lot of iterations, with small tweaks here and there over a few month period, before I landed on the final settings. The idea was to create a generic Kodak-ish color negative film aesthetic, perhaps something similar to ColorPlus 200 or Pro Image 100. While I did look at both of those emulsions a number of times during the development of this Recipe, I didn’t set out to strictly emulate either of them. I think there can be similarities at times to both of those film stocks, but generally speaking this Recipe isn’t a replication of either—or any—film. I hope that makes sense. I do think it does a good job at producing a generic color negative film aesthetic that is by-and-large Kodak-esque, with occasional similarities to both ColorPlus 200 and Pro Image 100.
Pro Neg was a Fuji X Weekly App Patron Early-Access Recipe. The Fuji X Weekly App is free, yet becoming a Fuji X Weekly Patron unlocks the best App experience! One benefit of being a Patron is you get early access to some new Film Simulation Recipes. These Early-Access Recipes will eventually become available free to everyone in time. This one was just replaced by another, so now it’s available to everyone. Patrons help support Fuji X Weekly and, really, without them there would be no App. So I want to give a special “thank you” to all of the Patrons!
Beautiful Bougainvillea Blooms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 – Pro Neg Recipe
This Pro Neg Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-T3 & X-T30, plus all X-Trans III cameras, which are the X-Pro2, X100F, X-E3, X-T2, X-T20, and X-H1. For newer cameras, you’ll have to decide on a Grain size (Small or Large), set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off, and Clarity to 0. This Recipe is also compatible with the GFX100; it can be used on “older” GFX models (50R and 50S), but will render slightly differently (try it anyway).
Film Simulation: PRO Neg. Hi Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Weak Color Chrome Effect: Off/NA White Balance: 9100K, -7 Red & +7 Blue Highlight: +1 Shadow: +1 Color: +1 Sharpness: -1 High ISO NR: -4 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: +1/3 to +1 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Pro Neg Film Simulation Recipe on my Fujifilm X-T30:
Empty Schoolyard – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Backyard Wall View – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Hidden Triangle – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Gila River Hat – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Tree by Field 4 – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Bougainvillea Petals – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Little Cloud Between the Trees – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Twin Palms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Palm Behind Bougainvillea Blossoms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Suburban Colors – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Bougainvillea in the Sky – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Basketball Hoop at Dusk – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Hoop & Tree – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Court Cycle – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Dusk Saguaro – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
One Fallen, One Standing – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Window Reflection – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Yellow Trumpet – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Backyard Rose Blossom – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Fujifilm’s Film Simulations are not mere digital filters. Harnessing more than 70 years of knowledge and experience making photographic and cinematic films, Fujifilm set out to infuse their X and GFX cameras with an analog soul. With a combination of complex elements, these Film Simulations provide a wide variety of looks inspired by film or darkroom techniques. There are 20 different Film Simulations on the latest models, and it can be overwhelming to know where to begin. I like some more than others, but which are best is personal—my preferences might be different than yours. For me, five Film Simulations have emerged as iconic, and are my personal favorites. There are others that didn’t make this cut that I also appreciate and use regularly. Each Film Simulation has its moment when it works really well.
My five favorites are Acros, Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Neg., and Reala Ace. We’ll take a look at each of them. I will also recommend a few Film Simulation Recipes, selected for those who want to experience the full power of Fujifilm’s renown JPEG engine. Recipes use the various JPEG parameters made available by Fujifilm to customize the aesthetic of the Film Simulations, producing a variety of looks that are often based off of classic film stocks.
Acros is Fujifilm’s crowning achievement in monochrome photography. This Film Simulation replicates the tonal response and grain structure of real panchromatic film. It features smooth gradation, deep blacks, and beautiful highlight roll-off. Acros is unique because Grain is applied algorithmically and varies depending on ISO and exposure, giving it an organic analog-like feel. Fujifilm offers three filter variants: Acros+R (simulates the use of a red filter), Acros+Ye (simulations the use of a yellow filter), and Acros+G (simulates the use of a green filter), further mimicking the tonal rendering of black-and-white film.
This Film Simulation shines in genres where texture and tone are essential, especially street photography, portraits, documentary, and minimalism. Acros is ideal when you want to eliminate the distraction of color and focus purely on light and form. When paired with the right Recipe, it can evoke the gritty spirit of classic film stocks like Tri-X, or deliver a softer tonality for quieter moments. The Acros Recipes below are some of my personal favorites.
Classic Chrome was modeled after classic photojournalism photographs, and produces a documentary-style look. The reference pictures were emulsions like Kodachrome and Ektachrome. While Fujifilm will never say Kodak, Classic Chrome has a distinctive Kodak-like color palette. With a slightly lower saturation and stronger contrast than many other Film Simulations, it can be used for a bold-yet-somehow-subdued look.
Classic Chrome is great for many genres. It can be adapted for landscapes, portraits, travel, street and urban scenes, or storytelling photography. It’s the most popular Film Simulation for those who use Recipes, and the most iconic Recipes use Classic Chrome as their foundation. Below are the most popular Film Simulation Recipes—not only that use this Film Sim., but out of all Recipes.
Classic Negative is based on Fujicolor Superia, a line of consumer films known for rich colors and its 4th layer technology, which provided versatility in a variety light situations. It’s a bold Film Simulation with a unique ability: the way it renders is dependent on the brightness of the picture, behaving somewhat similar to the film when overexposed or underexposed—delivering complex, sometimes unpredictable color shifts. Greens can appear silvery, reds can pop or fade depending on the lighting, and skin tones have a nostalgic rendering. The results are reminiscent of pictures found in many photo albums from the 1990’s and early 2000’s.
Classic Negative is especially well suited for snapshots of daily life and family vacations—really, any subject where you want a stylized, analog-inspired aesthetic. It exaggerates contrast in a way that feels emotionally driven, almost like how memory transforms color and mood. It’s one of the most fun Film Simulations to experiment with, and the Recipes built on it often have strong personalities.
Introduced with the GFX100S and later made available in fifth-generation X-Trans V cameras, Nostalgic Neg. was designed to mimic the aesthetic of New American Color prints from the 1970’s. It was inspired by the works of William Eggleston, Stephen Shore, Joel Sternfeld and Richard Misrach, among others. Like Classic Chrome, Nostalgic Neg. has a strong Kodak-like rendering, albeit from a different era. Nostalgic Neg. gives the feeling of looking through an old photo album filled with warm memories, especially prints from the ’60’s and ’70’s.
This Film Simulation excels in storytelling, and is especially great for travel and documentary photography. Nostalgic Neg. is an emotional Film Simulation, and Recipes built on it often lean into the sentimental, creating photos that feel more like visual poetry than true-to-life renderings.
Reala Ace is the newest Film Simulation in Fujifilm’s lineup. It blends natural color fidelity with enhanced contrast and shadow depth, aiming to strike a balance between documentary realism and artistic expression. The tones are clean and accurate, but never sterile—just enough pop to give photographs life without looking overly processed. It’s most similar to PRO Neg. Std, but isn’t exactly like it, either, with an obvious nod to Fujicolor PRO 160C color negative film.
Reala Ace is an excellent choice for all-purpose photography—whether you’re shooting travel, street, portraits, or landscapes. It can be adapted to a wide range of subjects, lighting, and moods. As a base for Recipes, it can be made to produce a variety of different looks. It’s not surprising to me that Reala Ace is becoming a go-to Film Simulation for many photographers.
These five Film Simulations—Acros, Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Neg., and Reala Ace—represent the heart of Fujifilm’s JPEG magic. Each offers a unique way to see the world. They allow you to create finished straight-out-of-camera photographs that look great and don’t need to be edited, especially when combined with Film Simulation Recipes. Film Simulations and Recipes are tools of expression, just like film stocks. Shoot more, edit less, and let your camera become your darkroom. Wow, I need to use that last sentence as a tagline or something.
Coastal Arches – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-S20 – Kodacolor VR 200 – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
I’ve received a lot of questions lately about the Fujifilm X-M5 and X-S20. Specifically, people want to know what generation these two cameras fall under, and which Film Simulation Recipes they should use on their model. I’m not sure why this question has been asked so much lately, but there has definitely been a noticeable spike. Let’s get right into the answer, which is simple and complicated.
Both the X-M5 and X-S20 feature the same 26-megapixel X-Trans IV sensor found in the previous-generation models, such as the X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, and X-T30 II. So it might seem obvious: they must be fourth-generation cameras, right? Not quite. Despite the sensor, both the X-M5 and X-S20 have the new X-Processor 5, the same as the X-T5, X100VI, X-H2, and X-T50, among others. In other words, these two cameras have a foot in both the X-Trans IV and X-Trans V worlds.
While sensor generation typically defines the era of Fujifilm cameras, it’s not just about the sensor itself—it’s also about the image processor, the firmware, and the JPEG engine. The X-Processor 5 brings with it some new Film Simulations, and a slightly divergent rendering (namely, the color blue on Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, Eterna, and Eterna Bleach Bypass). Even though the sensor on the X-M5 and X-S20 are from the prior generation, the JPEG options and rendering are more in line with the latest generation.
Flowering Tree – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-S20 – Summer Sun – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
The most appropriate Film Simulation Recipes for the X-M5 and X-S20 are X-Trans V and not X-Trans IV. Recipes designed for X-Trans IV that use Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, Eterna, and Eterna Bleach Bypass might not look quite right, and will need a Color Chrome FX Blue adjustment. If the X-Trans IV Recipe (that uses one of those four Film Sims) calls for Color Chrome FX Blue set to Strong, use Weak instead; if it calls for Weak, use Off instead. With that simple adjustment, those X-Trans IV Recipes are fully compatible with the X-M5 and X-S20, as are all X-Trans IV (except those intended for the X-T3/X-T30) that aren’t based on those four Film Simulations.
While it’s a bit convoluted, the answers aren’t terribly complicated. Even though the X-M5 and X-S20 are a bit both X-Trans IV & V, they are indeed fifth-generation models. The Recipes that are most appropriate for these two cameras are the ones intended for X-Trans V cameras, like the X-H2s, X-T5, X100VI, etc., etc., but some X-Trans IV Recipes—those that don’t use Classic Chrome, Classic Negative, Eterna, and Eterna Bleach Bypass—are also fully compatible, and some are made compatible simply by reducing Color Chrome FX Blue down by one. Clear as mud? I hope this makes sense for those wondering which Recipes to use on their camera.
Mission San Xavier del Bac – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Kodak Vericolor VPS
Kodak introduced Vericolor color negative film in 1974. It was their professional emulsion for portrait, wedding, and studio photography, and was designed to work well with flashes. Vericolor was a predecessor of Portra, intended to produce pleasing skin tones. There were a handful of different versions produced in the 1970’s and 1980’s, and the line was discontinued in the late-1990’s with the introduction of Portra.
While this Film Simulation Recipe is called Kodak Vericolor VPS, which was an ISO 160 version released in 1979, I think it’s actually more similar to Vericolor II, released in 1977. I had a difficult time finding examples to model this after, and a couple of old photography magazines were my best source. This Recipe definitely has the right vibe for late-1970’s Vericolor, particularly printed pictures from the film. I found it to be quite versatile—excellent for sunny daylight, golden hour, overcast, natural light indoors, and even certain nighttime situations. This could definitely be the go-to Recipe for some of you, especially if you appreciate a late-1970’s or early ’80’s aesthetic.
Manitou & Pike’s Peak – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5 – Kodak Vericolor VPS
Because this Kodak Vericolor VPS Recipe uses the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, it is only compatible with fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, which (as of this writing) are the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. It’s also compatible with the latest GFX models: GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Film Simulation: Nostalgic Neg. Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Strong, Large Color Chrome Effect: Strong Color Chrome FX Blue: Strong White Balance: 4500K, +2 Red & -5 Blue Highlight: -1 Shadow: +2 Color: +3 Sharpness: -1 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: -2 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: +1/3 to +1 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Kodak Vericolor VPS Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5:
Pick Here – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Tree Ghost – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
North Pole – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Alleyway Photography – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Handheld Camera – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Fujifilm Photographer – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Mission – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Pikes Peak Inn – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Gas Tanks – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Suburban Home – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Yellow Bougainvillea Blossoms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Potted Leaves – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Cactus & Wall – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Sunlit Leaves – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Odadiuc – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Indoor Flag – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Superguard – Waddell, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Moon over Sedona – Sedona, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
In-N-Out – Surprise, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Neighborhood Fireworks – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Fujifilm X-E5 in black: B&H, Nuzira Fujifilm X-E5 in silver: B&H, Nuzira
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Mennonite Plow – Ronks, PA – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Nostalgic Film
I get asked fairly regularly which Film Simulation Recipes are the most popular. For me, this is a fascinating topic, but it’s definitely hard to know definitively. While I get a glimpse on social media, my best gauge is the Fuji X Weekly website statistics; specifically, which Recipe articles are viewed the most. I don’t collect any data on the Fuji X Weekly App, so that’s no help—although, if I did, it would likely offer the most accurate picture; however, it would still be impossible to know which Recipes people programmed into their Fujifilm cameras, or how often they used each. Perhaps a survey would be particularly useful, yet even it has its limitations. While certainly a flawed method, page-view website statics offer the best glimpse at which Film Simulation Recipes are the most popular, so that’s what I’m using for this article. These are simply the Top 25 most-viewed Recipes on the Fuji X Weekly website so far in 2025.
It’s been awhile since I did one of these articles—the last time was for January. There’s always some movement from month-to-month, but overall it’s pretty predictable. Taking a six-month view offers more clear picture than a 30-day snapshot. For this reason, I might wait until the end of the year before I do another.
Those Recipes with Kodak brand names in the title—Kodachrome, Portra, Gold, Tri-X, etc., etc.—are usually the most popular. Classic Chrome is the king of film simulations, as the majority of the most-viewed Recipes are based on that film simulation. Classic Negative and Reala Ace are battling for the second and third positions. Acros, Eterna, and Nostalgic Neg. are neck-in-neck-in-neck for fourth, fifth, and sixth places.
Without any further delay, below are the most popular Recipes at the halfway point of 2025!
Top 25 Most Popular Film Simulation Recipes of 2025 (so far…)
Reggie’s Portra is now the number one top Film Simulation Recipe on Fuji X Weekly! It’s always been popular, but interest in this Recipe has soared this year. Reggie Ballesteros created it by modifying my Kodak Portra 400 Recipe to better suit his style and needs. Of the various Portra Recipes, this is the most versatile, and the most popular for portrait photography. This is for X-Trans IV cameras; for X-Trans V, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off.
A Classic Chrome based Recipe for X-Trans IV cameras that was the long-time most popular Film Simulation Recipe for Fujifilm cameras on this website. It’s one of my personal favorites.
Pacific Blues and Reala Ace go back-and-forth for which is the most popular Classic Negative Recipe; currently, it’s Pacific Blues. This particular version is compatible with X-Trans IV models, but there is also an X-Trans V version that’s further down the list. This is another of my personal favorite Recipes.
This version of Kodak Portra 400, which is compatible with X-Trans IV cameras, was once commonly the third most popular Film Simulation Recipe on Fuji X Weekly. While it doesn’t rank as high as it once did, it’s still quite popular.
This is the long-time most popular B&W Recipe on Fuji X Weekly. It’s based on the Acros film simulation, and has compatibility with X-Trans III, X-Trans IV, and X-Trans V models. This is one of my absolute top-favorite Recipes.
This is a somewhat newish Recipe, published on October 31st. It uses the Reala Ace film simulation, which means that it is compatible with X-Trans V cameras.
It is probably unfair to include the Film Dial Recipes in this list because it is not one Recipe, but 14. When it showed up in the Top 25, I was faced with the choice to included it (as unfair as that might be) or not. The Vibrant Arizona article is technically four Recipes, so there is a precedence for its inclusion. I have no idea which of the 14 are the most used.
Like the Film Dial Recipe set, this is actually 14 Recipes and not just one. Its inclusion is a little unfair, but here it is. I have no way of knowing which of the 14 are the most used.
This Recipe uses Classic Chrome and is compatible with both X-Trans IV and X-Trans V models. Interestingly enough, Fujifilm has displayed two of my images at events over the last year, and both were created using this Classic Color Recipe.
Vintage Kodachrome, which is based on Classic Chrome, is one of the older Film Simulation Recipes on Fuji X Weekly, and is compatible with X-Trans III cameras.
This new Recipe, which I’m calling Summer Sun, is bright and warm. If a hot summer day was a picture aesthetic, it’s this. It has a vintage film-like charm, maybe along the lines of Kodak Ultra Color 100UC used with a warming filter (maybe 81C). It’s not specifically modeled after that, but has some similarities nonetheless.
Death of a Chevy – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Summer Sun Recipe
This Summer Sun Recipe is very warm, so it’s definitely not for every subject or light situation. It’s best on a bright sunny day, but can still be okay in partly-sunny situations. It’s compatible with all fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, which (as of this writing) are the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. It’s also compatible with the latest GFX models, specifically the GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Film Simulation: Reala Ace Dynamic Range: DR200 Grain Effect: Strong, Small Color Chrome Effect: Strong Color Chrome FX Blue: Weak White Balance: 7200K, -2 Red & +2 Blue Highlight: -1 Shadow: -2 Color: +4 Sharpness: -1 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: -3 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: 0 to +2/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Summer Sun Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5, X100VI & X-S20:
Manhattan from Hotel Window – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Fruits & Vegetables – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Building Backsides – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Spirits of the Past – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Green Mack – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
It’s Corn – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Newly Planted Palms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Evening Palm Tree – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Suburban Palm – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Flowering Tree – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
Brooklyn Bridge between Trees – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Bridge, Runner – NYC, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
It’s All Greek to Me – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
Red Dumpster – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
Summer Joy – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Hidden Tower – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-S20 – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
Fireworks Stop – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
I’m hesitant to write this review, because the Fujifilm X half is paradoxical. There’s a lot about it that’s conflicting. You can say this aspect of it is great for a certain group of people, but this aspect of it is not. This might be the most unique digital camera ever made, so it’s going to get a lot of attention, but also a lot of criticism. Trying to figure out who will most appreciate the X half (also called X-HF1) has been an intriguing endeavor.
To be completely transparent, it’s important for me to tell you upfront that Fujifilm sent me an X half to keep. Yea! Thank you, Fujifilm. I didn’t pay a dime for the camera. But I did have an X half preordered, so I was planning to spend money on one. I’m doing my best to not let my impressions be colored by Fujifilm’s kind generosity.
There are a few things that are unique about X-HF1. The headline is the vertically-mounted 1″ sensor. As far as I know, this is the very first camera to have a vertical sensor, all others are horizontal—that is, aside from cellphones. A lot of people—younger people especially—tend to photograph vertically on their cellphones, so it was just a matter of time before a camera would have a tall sensor. The X half is revolutionary because it’s the very first. I suspect there will be more in the future, and Fujifilm won’t be the only brand. Speaking of 1″ sensors, the name is a bit misleading. The surface area of a so-called 1″ sensor is the same as old 1″ Vidicon vacuum tube television cameras. So the name (“one inch”) has to do with the tube size of TV cameras from the ’50’s, ’60’s and ’70’s, and not the dimensions of the sensor.
The inspiration for the X half—and where the name comes from—are half-frame film cameras, like the Fujica Half, Olympus Pen, Kodak H35N, and Pentax 17. These cameras use half of a 35mm frame for each picture, orientated tall. Some medium-format cameras also are natively portrait orientated. Cameras that capture vertical photos are not new, but they are new in the digital age. Of course it has to be said that the X-HF1’s sensor isn’t half the size of a full-frame sensor, or even half the size of APS-C; no, the X half‘s “half” is not a mathematical term, but simply a nod to analog half-frame cameras. The 3:4 aspect ratio is also the same as half-frame cameras.
Like a half-frame film camera, the X half is capable of creating diptychs, which are two frames side-by-side combined into one image. You can do this easily in-camera using the Frame Advance Lever, or after-the-fact using the new X half app. It’s a heck-of-a-lot of fun, but I imagine that the novelty will wear off after awhile. While it will put a (customizable) bar in-between the two frames, I wish it had the option for a boarder around the whole image like in the examples above, which was done using a third-party app. Maybe Fujifilm will add this feature to the X half app in the future.
The X-HF1 is as minimalistic as it gets in the X-series. The menu has been simplified and streamlined, and a lot of settings have been left out. You cannot use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera, only the stock Film Simulations and Filters. Not all of the Film Sims made the cut, but most of them are there: Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, Classic Negative, Nostalgic Negative, Eterna, Acros (include +Ye, +R & +G), and Sepia. I would rather have Eterna Bleach Bypass over Sepia, but it’s a good group overall. There are a whole bunch of Filters (called Advanced Filters on other X-series cameras), some of which are borrowed from the Instax Evo cameras. My favorites are Pop Color, Light Leak, Expired Film, and Retro. These cannot be used in addition to Film Simulations—it’s one or the other, and not both. The list of Filters is quite long, and I don’t have an interest in most of them, so I wish that you could customize which ones are available, to make it easier to find and select the ones you actually want to use.
Above: Pop Color Filter
Above: Light Leak Filter
Above: Expired Film Filter
Above: Retro Filter
Pop Color is reminiscent of Fujichrome Fortia. I’d actually like to see it graduate to Film Simulation status. Light Leak, as well as filters like Halation and Vignette, should become JPEG options on other X-series cameras, that can be added to any Film Simulation. Expired Film and Retro should be added as Advanced Filters. Of the three Expired Film options, Green and Neutral are my favorites.
The only customizations that are available are Grain, Portrait Enhancer (which I believe is just Smooth Skin Effect renamed), White Balance (but no WB Shift), and Long Exposure NR. One cool thing is that these are also applied to the Filters, and not just the Film Simulations—I’d love for that to make its way to other X-series cameras. Beyond that, the Film Simulations and Filters cannot be customized to achieve various looks, which is a real bummer for someone like me who uses Recipes extensively.
Top left: Weak / Small Grain. Top right: Strong / Large Grain. Bottom: Actual Ilford Delta P3200 film
I enjoy a little grain in my photos. It adds texture that’s been common in photography for much of its existence. The X-HF1 has faux grain, with four options: Weak/Small, Weak/Large, Strong/Small, and Strong/Large. Grain set to Weak/Small on the X half is a little more pronounced than Strong/Large is on (for example) the X100VI. I wish that there was a less strong option than Weak/Small, because it’s borderline too much; however, since there’s not, I used it almost exclusively. Strong/Large is a bit ridiculous, and is reminiscent of the grain of ultra-high ISO films like Ilford Delta P3200. If you want to achieve an Ilford Delta P3200 look, the X half isn’t far off at all when Grain is set to its maximum parameters.
Another word about Grain is that it slows the camera down, much like Clarity on other X-series cameras. I found this to be odd, and my theory is that when Grain is applied, so is Clarity (maybe -2). I tried to prove this, but couldn’t, so I might be completely wrong. I have another theory that—for Film Simulations, at least, and maybe for Filters—Color is increased as exposure is increased, and is reduced as the exposure is reduced. I also tried to prove this, but got mixed results, so I’m not certain if this is how the camera is programmed, or just a natural effect of over and under exposure.
Above: Classic Negative
The camera seems to apply a heavy-handed noise reduction, and then a heavy-handed sharpening to compensate. I would love to have some control over this, as it’s not my favorite approach. It might be necessary, though, since the X-HF1 has a Bayer sensor instead of X-Trans. One benefit of X-Trans that doesn’t get discussed enough is that it allows noise to be more easily identified and controlled; Fujifilm uses this to make it more film-grain-like, and less of a nuisance. Since this is a Bayer camera, it might require a little stronger noise reduction.
Another benefit of X-Trans is that it has more green pixels (55%, compared to 50% on Bayer), which allows for more luminosity information. This provides a little more dynamic range and high-ISO capabilities. On the X half, dynamic range is quite limited. I would say it’s roughly comparable to DR100 with Highlight and Shadow set to +0.5 on other X-series cameras. It’s fairly easy to clip highlights and/or block up shadows, and is a little like slide film in this regard. Since this camera is JPEG-only (no RAW), you have to be very careful about the exposure.
Above left: ISO 1600. Above right: ISO 4000
I found that I prefer ISO 400 and below on the X half, reminiscent of Sigma Merrill cameras, which has a similar limitation. In a pinch you can go higher, especially if the picture will only be shared to social media, but I tried my best to keep the ISO at or below ISO 400 whenever possible. Because the maximum aperture of the lens is “only” f/2.8, when the sun goes down it can be very challenging to use the camera.
The X-HF1 does have a built-in flash, albeit not a great one. It doesn’t have a hotshoe, only a coldshoe. Flash photography is, unfortunately, not ideal on this camera, which is too bad, since it has a leaf shutter. If Fujifilm someday makes a second version, I hope that it either has a proper flash or a hotshoe (or both), as this current setup is mediocre at best. I kept the flash off most of the time.
Above: Flash photography on the X half
One really cool feature is called Film Camera Mode. You select either 36, 54, or 72 shots, and you are dedicated to that mode until you’ve completed your “roll of film”—which is whatever Film Simulation you chose. I do wish that 24 was an option, as it takes awhile to finish a roll. You cannot review the photos until they’ve been “developed” in the X half app. In this mode, the X-HF1 functions similarly to point-and-shoot film cameras from the 1990’s. You have to use the Frame Advance Lever in-between shots. It’s a ton of fun, but also challenging, because you have no idea if you correctly exposed, focused, or even if you framed it well. I kept forgetting to take the lens cap off, too. My daughter coined the 72 shot roll as the 72 exposure challenge. I’d love for that to become a community-driven trend, where people post their best frames from their 72 exposure “roll” on social media, with the hashtag #72exposurechallenge.
It would be nice if you could use the various Filters in this mode, and not just the Film Simulations. ***Edit: I was on a pre-production firmware; however, after updating to the latest version, I can now use Filters in the Film Camera Mode. Yea! Sorry for the confusion.*** Another thing I’d appreciate is that whatever ISO you have selected is carried over to the Film Camera Mode. Unfortunately, you only get Auto ISO up to ISO 12800, which is totally unusable whenever it goes that high. Fortunately, your Grain and White Balance settings are carried over, so be sure to set those before starting.
Above: X half contact sheet and various frames
Once you develop your “roll” in the app, you get a contact sheet. It would be great if you could long-press on a frame, and it would give you the option of saving that frame with the sprockets, or that frame plus the one next to it (on either side, unless it’s the end of the strip), or the whole strip. Instead, you have to crop the contact sheet in order to accomplish that. But I’m a huge fan of the contact sheet in-general, it’s a really cool idea.
Overall, I enjoyed using the Film Camera Mode, but I found myself not using it as much as the regular shooting mode because you have to be in the mood for it. One of the challenges that I appreciate about the X-HF1 is finding the “right” Film Simulation or Filter, combined with the “best” White Balance, to convey the mood of the scene most appropriately. The X half is so simple that a three-year-old could use it, but to get the most out of it requires thinking a little more deeply about things that are easily taken for granted. It’s been one of the most simple yet most challenging cameras I’ve ever used—the paradox I mentioned in the opening sentence.
Fujifilm X half – Acros Film Simulation
The X half is capable of recording video, but it’s very mediocre. Someone will use it creatively just to prove the point that it can be done, but I think Fujifilm probably should have just left off video, which would have made an interesting statement. Or else, maybe do a faux 8mm thing with sprockets and light leaks and such—that would have been really cool. Food for thought for the next iteration, if there is one someday.
Who should consider buying this camera? I think there are a few obvious answers. First, the X-HF1 has a foot in both the X-series and the Instax world. For those unaware, Instax is bigger than X and GFX combined. I talked to a bunch of people—probably close to ten—who own an Instax camera yet don’t own any X-series model, and they were all highly interested in the X half. Six different people told me that it’s the only Fujifilm camera they want, aside from Instax. The X half is an obvious bridge into the X-series for these folks. Also, some people who shoot point-and-shoot film cameras but are tired of the cost of film will find this to be an intriguing option. At $25 to $50+ per roll (including development and scanning), it won’t take long for the X half to pay for itself. The X-HF1 is sort of like a digital 110 camera, and almost lomography-esque, so it’s not difficult to see the appeal. Third, digicams are all the rage right now among younger people, and this camera can be considered in that category, too.
Above: Various pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
What about current X-series photographers? What about someone like me? The camera is a blast. It’s so much fun. But it’s a toy. It’s not a serious camera for serious photography (I’m sure someone will use it in a serious way just to prove the point that it can be). It’s great for casual snapshots. I used it extensively during nearly three weeks of travel, and it was my most-used camera during that time, even more than my Fujifilm X100VI. I have so many more pictures that I could share, this is only a small sampling. It’s so easy to always have on you, and I would rather use the X half than my iPhone, if only for the tactile experience and Fujifilm colors. If you think you’d enjoy it, it’s probably worthwhile to get. If you wonder why anyone would buy it, it’s probably not for you, and it’s easy to move on.
The biggest criticism is going to be the price. In America, the X half is a steep $850. Across the rest of the world, it’s roughly equivalent to $700 USD. Unfortunately, this was the first camera to include the new tariffs in the price (although Canon and Nikon have just implemented some price increases, and Sony will soon, too), so it’s a bit shocking. Some people will say it should be $200 or $300, and that’s highly unrealistic—just absurd and not even close to any level of reality. Some will say it should be $500, and I’d agree with that if it were pre-Covid; however, there’s been a lot of inflation since then. I believe that $650 to $700 is a fair price. $850 is a little much, but that’s largely not Fujifilm’s fault; hopefully the tariff situation will get resolved soon, and Fujifilm can drop the price to where it should be. I don’t know if that will happen, though, and if the camera sells really well at its current price, there may not be a reason to reduce it.
Above: Various diptych pictures captured with the Fujifilm X half
The last thing that I want to address is the inability to use Film Simulation Recipes with this camera. Recipes are a pretty big thing in the Fujifilm world—the brand-new X-E5 actually uses the word “Recipe” in the camera menu. I appreciate excellent straight-out-of-camera results. While I would love to be able to customize the looks more in the X half, you can still get good picture aesthetics with the limited tools available in the camera. The photography continuum has been leaning towards less editing for a few years now, and this camera is just a natural and seemingly inevitable expression of that.
There’s a lot to like about the Fujifilm X half, and a lot that can be questioned. You have to accept the camera for what it is and forgive it for not being what it’s not; otherwise, it might grind on your nerves. But, for certain, the camera is very enjoyable, and it offers a unique shooting experience not found anywhere else. If you want the X half experience, you have to have an X half. But that unique experience will not appeal to everyone, and maybe not even to most X-series photographers. I do believe this camera will be quite successful, and will bring many people into the X-series fold, mainly from groups that the camera industry has largely ignored. This will be the first X-series camera for a number of people, and someday some of those people will upgrade to a more premium model, perhaps an X-M5, X-E5, or X100VI. I think all of that is very good. It’s quite obvious to me that the Fujifilm X-HF1 will be a trendy camera, especially among younger photographers, and you’re soon going to see X half pictures all over TikTok and Instagram.
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
On Thursday in the early morning hours, Fujifilm announced the brand-new X-E5. I’ve been traveling in an RV up the east side of America, and just got home late last night. Preferably, I would have posted something about it on announcement day, but aside from being on the road, it was also my wife’s birthday. Because of that, I’m just now getting this typed out—I’m pretty much the last to the Fujifilm X-E5 party.
This upcoming Tuesday and Wednesday I will be at the B&H BILD Expo in New York City. A few weeks back Fujifilm invited me to be a part of their booth—specifically, to help with a “Film Simulation Station” (without any details of what that would be)—which, of course, I am honored to be a part of. Fast forward to a few days ago, just before the announcement of the X-E5, I had a conference call (while in the RV stopped in the middle of nowhere in Pennsylvania) that explained what my specific role was going to be: Fujifilm will have X-E5 cameras to touch-and-try, and I’m there to talk about Film Simulation Recipes with anyone who wants to. It’s going to be a great time, so I hope some of you can stop by. It was on that call that I first learned the camera not only has the ability to save three Recipes in the Film Simulation Dial, but that Fujifilm is using the term “Recipe” in the camera and manual.
Back in early 2017 (before I had even started Fuji X Weekly), I published two Film Simulation Recipes on a blog that I used to have prior to this one. When I showed my wife, she thought the term “Recipe” was a bit cringe, but I liked it, so I continued to use it, including when I launched Fuji X Weekly in August of 2017. Mostly by word of mouth, this website grew and grew (10 million page views two years in a row, and still growing), largely because people had an interest in my JPEG Recipes for Fujifilm cameras. Even though Fuji X Weekly began as a Fujifilm X100F journal, very quickly it became most known for Film Simulation Recipes.
In the summer of 2020, I received a message from a talented cinematographer, who had a funny conversation with Fujifilm North America that he wanted to share with me. They had loaned him an X100V for a few weeks; when he returned it, they asked for his feedback. He told them, “I really like shooting with Portra 400 and Tri-X.” They replied, “What do you mean? It’s a digital camera.” He was very surprised that Fujifilm had no idea about Fuji X Weekly, so he informed them.
Shortly after this, Fujifilm North America reached out to me. They were more curious about what I was doing than anything else. They wanted to know what a Recipe is. It was a very positive phone call, and I was thrilled to talk with someone at Fujifilm for the first time. A few emails went back-and-forth, and I was asked to write an article for them. Excitedly, I got it typed out and over to them quickly. They said it was great, and they would forward it up the chain. When it came back down, I was told that they liked my article, but they had to reject it because I had used competing brand names (like Kodak, Portra, Ilford, etc.). There wasn’t much communication after that, except that they wanted to use one of my pictures in an article. In December, Fujifilm sent me a coffee mug for Christmas.
A year later I was invited to be a guest on a Fujifilm tech webinar (did you know that Fujifilm does regular webinars?). The tech team is great. They’re all very knowledgable and helpful, and otherwise good people. They are big fans of Film Simulation Recipes, too. I enjoyed that experience. It was my last interaction with the brand until January of 2024, when Fujifilm North America called out of the blue, stating that they’d like to start working with me.
Dumbo Crowd – Brooklyn, New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Reala Ace Recipe
Last year was epic. Fujifilm invited me to be a part of various things, including a release event for the X-T50 and GFX100S II, a creator retreat, and their annual Create With Us event. I traveled across the country from coast-to-coast, leading photowalks. Incredible! It was such an honor. I will always remember 2024 fondly.
During that time I noticed Fujifilm began to use the term “Recipe” occasionally on their website and social media accounts. A certain X-Photographer noted to me that after years of promoting Recipes with pretty much zero interest or help from Fujifilm, suddenly Recipes were “the thing” within the company. Now, in 2025, “Recipe” is an official Fujifilm feature, and the term is found within the camera menu.
Nikon beat Fujifilm to the punch when they began using the term Recipe a year ago for their JPEG settings. I’m not sure if it will catch on within that community or not (it will be interesting to see), but it is noteworthy that they are trying to capitalize on it. This whole Recipe concept—whether by name or not—is certainly growing and spreading across photography. I think we will see it more and more in the coming years.
I didn’t invent the word “recipe” and I certainly wasn’t the first to use it within the photo world. Apparently, user-created Capture One presets have been called recipes for some time now (I became aware of this last year, I had no idea). Specific darkroom chemicals and development times have been called recipes for many decades. I discovered that a couple people had used the word when describing their Fujifilm JPEG settings before I ever published my first Film Simulation Recipe. I’m not sure if I coined the term Recipe for JPEG camera setting combinations (I might have, but it doesn’t matter if I did or didn’t). What is certain is that if not for this website and the wonderful community that formed around using Recipes (which is the best community in all of photography, IMHO), the word would not be found in the Fujifilm X-E5 today (and it probably wouldn’t be used by Nikon, either). I’m still in disbelief at where we’re at today, I never imagined it would go this far. Some people will read that and think I’m bragging and taking too much credit, but believe me that I’m writing this in all humbleness.
I won’t get to see the Fujifilm X-E5 until Tuesday morning, about two hours before the BILD Expo doors open. Fujifilm tried to get me a loaner camera a little earlier, but due to travel, it just didn’t work out (it’s not their fault—they really did try). Right now I know as much about the X-E5 as the next person (maybe less), so I don’t have any real insights. I’m going to spend this weekend learning more so that I don’t sound completely ignorant at BILD. Once I’ve had a chance to touch it, and maybe even capture a couple of pictures (hopefully I’ll get an opportunity to do that), I’ll be able to speak more about it, so look for a more thorough article in a couple weeks.
What I can say is that the Fujifilm X-E5 is basically an interchangeable-lens X100VI. It’s not exactly that, but it’s as close as you’re going to get. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. The X100VI has an optical viewfinder, shutter/ISO combo dial, leaf shutter, flash, built-in ND-filter, and can be weather-sealed; the X-E5 has a Film Dial, selfie-capable LCD, and you can change lenses. Otherwise, the two cameras are a lot alike. For those that have asked for an interchangeable-lens X100VI, here it is! You are unlikely to get closer to that wish than this camera.
White Bridge across Pond – Charleston, SC – Fujifilm X-E4 – Pacific Blues Recipe
As a more premium iteration of the X-E line, it obviously has seen a price increase. Add to that inflation and tariffs, and you get a $1,700 price tag. That seems like a lot of money (because it is), but remember 1) every major camera maker has indicated that they will be raising their prices soon (Fujifilm is just the first, beginning with the X half and X-E5), and 2) cameras used to be a lot more expensive—for example, the Canon A-1 was $625 in 1978, which is over $3,000 when adjusted for inflation; the Pentax K-5 was $1,750 in 2010, which is nearly $2,600 in today’s money. The X-E1 was $1,000 in 2012, which is $1,400 today when accounting for inflation—add tariffs on top of that, and it’s the same cost as the X-E5. So maybe the price isn’t so unreasonable after all. People will say, “But I can get an X-T5 for the same money!” Or, “For just a few hundred dollars more, I can get [insert camera name here]!” That’s true, for now. Either the prices of those models will increase shortly, or something will happen with the tariffs, and Fujifilm will be able to reduce the price of the X-E5 to what it was intended to be. Those who wanted 40mp and IBIS and the camera to be more premium but didn’t want the cost to go up were not being realistic. Even the X-E4, when accounting for inflation would be over $1,000 today.
The final thing I’ll say about the Fujifilm X-E5 is that, with C1-C7, plus the “bonus 8th Recipe” that you can program into the IQ Menu, plus the three Recipe slots on the Film Dial, it’s possible to have up to 11 Film Simulation Recipes loaded into the camera at any given time. You can only name seven of them, so you’ll have to remember what the other four are. If you use one or both of my “universal” Recipes (here and here), that adds even more flexibility. Awesome! We’ll see if Fujifilm brings that functionality to the X-T50 and X-M5 via a firmware update—I hope they do.
If you are in New York City on Tuesday and Wednesday, be sure to stop by the Fujifilm booth and touch-and-try the X-E5. I’d love to chat Recipes with you, so be sure to look for me. If you are in Colorado Springs on June 28th, I’ll be leading a photowalk with Mike’s Camera (click here for the details and to register); while I won’t have an X-E5 with me, I’d still love to chat with you about it, or any other Fujifilm or photography related topics. I hope to see you soon!
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Fujifilm X-E5 in black: B&H, Nuzira Fujifilm X-E5 in silver: B&H, Nuzira
Anyone who has ever used a Fujifilm X or GFX camera has used Film Simulations. No mater if you are a JPEG photographer or a strict RAW shooter, you use at least one Film Simulations. There’s no getting around it.
Those who claim “I don’t use Film Simulations” on their Fujifilm cameras are not being honest because it’s nearly impossible to disable them (we’ll get into that in a moment). What they are really stating is, “Film Simulations are for those JPEG people; I shoot RAW, so they don’t apply to me.” But, silly goose: they apply to the RAW photographer just as much as to those who shoot straight-out-of-camera. In some cases this may simply be ignorance, not realizing that Provia—the “standard” option—is one of the 20 Film Sims; however, I believe it can also be explained by arrogance: “Film Simulations are for JPEGs, and Real Photographers™ don’t shoot JPEGs.”
Interestingly enough, the most popular Film Simulation by far among strict RAW photographers is Provia, while the most popular Film Simulation by far among those who use Film Simulation Recipes is Classic Chrome. The Provia Film Simulation is intended to be broadly appealing, especially to those without a background in film photography. Classic Chrome is intended to appeal to those who want a film look. For those who use Recipes, Provia isn’t even one of the Top 5 most popular.
There are only two ways to disable the Film Simulations. The easiest and most obvious is to use the Advanced Filters, which, when activated, are in lieu of Film Simulations (although some of those are based on Provia); however, I don’t think the people who loathe Film Sims are using the Advanced Filter options. The second requires a camera with an OVF. Disable the EVF and turn off image playback. Only use the OVF. Then, in Lightroom, change the base color profile to your own or Lightroom’s neutral base. In that way, you never have to look at a Film Simulation.
The problem with saying “I don’t use Film Simulations” is that each time you look at the EVF or review on the LCD the photo you just captured, you are seeing it with a Film Simulation applied, most likely Provia. You are seeing the world through the lens of that Film Sim each time you use your camera. You may or may not use Lightroom’s or Capture One’s version of a particular Film Simulation when you edit your RAW photos (most probably do), but at the time of capture, you are absolutely using a Film Simulation.
Film Simulations are half the fun of Fujifilm cameras. Those who use Recipes already know this. My suspicion is that those who only ever use Provia haven’t tried the other options, or maybe only briefly did when their camera was brand-new before quickly dismissing them. In other words, they may not know what they’re missing. It’s quite possible that they’d like their cameras even more if they explored this feature.
Worn Out – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Classic Chrome – Kodak Portra 400 v2
My suggestion, if you are a strict RAW photographer who would never be caught dead shooting JPEGs, is to try the other Film Simulations. You might find one that better matches your vision more than Provia, which might help you to better visualize the final result at the time of capture. It can be a useful tool; you might find it to be less of a gimmick than you thought it was. Then, hopefully, we can move beyond the “I don’t use Film Simulations” nonsense, which is untrue. If you use a Fujifilm camera, you use Film Simulations. Period. Maybe you only use one, but you still use them.
As for the rest of us who find Film Simulations to be one of the defining features of our cameras, it’s ok to celebrate that. There’s no need to feel “less than” because some jerk talks down to you. If that person found what works best for him or her, that’s wonderful; if you found what works best for you, that’s equally as wonderful. There’s no right or wrong way to do photography, or one way that is superior. What I can say after meeting hundreds of you: these people might be common on the internet, but they are rare in real life. Most people are kind, friendly, and accepting. And, as it turns out, we have more in common than we thought, including that we all use Film Simulations.
