I’m not a concert photographer. I attend maybe one or two each year, and generally don’t have good seats; besides, the events often have a “no camera” policy. But I get asked quite frequently which Film Simulation Recipes are best for concert photography. I never have a good answer (only guesses), so when the opportunity came to try out various Recipes at a rock concert, I jumped at the chance. All of these pictures were captured from my seat at the back-right corner of the venue—not the best spot, but not terrible, either.
This will be a series of articles, with this post serving as Part 1. I loaded eight Recipes into my Fujifilm X-T5 (plus 11 in my X-E5), and reshuffled a bit at intermission. This was actually a three-day concert, so I did this multiple times. Later, I reprocessed some of the RAW files in-camera to see how some additional Recipes would do. For Part 1, the twelve Recipes are Superia Negative, Fujicolor PRO 160C Warm, Velvia Film, Cinematic Film (those four are all Film Dial Recipes), Reala Ace, Pacific Blues, Superia Xtra 400, Nostalgic Americana, Nostalgia Negative, Kodak Negative, Kodak Portra 400 v2, and Kodak Ektachrome E100VS v1. The one requirement that I gave myself is that the Recipes needed to use DR400 to help keep the highlights in check.
All of these 12 Recipes seemed to do well. None were busts. My favorites were the Classic Negative-based Recipes: Superia Negative, Pacific Blues, Reala Ace, and Superia Xtra 400. I can definitely recommend those, especially Superia Negative and Reala Ace. I also liked the Nostalgic Neg.-based Recipes: Nostalgic Americana, Nostalgia Negative, and Kodak Negative. My least favorite were the Velvia-based Recipes: Velvia Film and Kodak Ektachrome E100VS v1. That’s not to say those Recipes were bad, only that I liked the others better. I think any of these 12 would work, but, in the future, I’d probably choose a few Classic Negative options, plus one or two Nostalgic Neg., and call it good.
The band in top photo is We Came From Space, which you’ll see a little more of in the upcoming parts (I’m not sure yet just how many posts there will be in this series, but likely three). They’re a classic rock/synth rock/blues rock/prog rock/pop fusion with out-of-this-world talent (sorry for the pun). All the remaining photos are of Cosmic Cathedral, a groove-oriented progressive rock super group featuring Phil Keaggy on guitars/vocals, Neal Morse on keyboards/guitar/vocals, Bryon House on bass, and Chester Thompson on drums (if you’ve ever seen Genesis or Phil Collins live, you’ve likely heard Chester keeping time). A number of additional musicians joined the band to complete the sound. This was their first concert as a band, and it was such a great show!
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and hundreds more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
I just got back into town from an epic 10-day trip. I’ve been up since 1:30 AM, so I apologize for the typos that will inevitably be found in this article. This is a followup to my last post, which I wanted to write while traveling, but it just didn’t work out. The basic premise of this is simple: if I were to design the ultimate Film Dial for Fujifilm, what would that look like?
Fujifilm introduced the Film Dial on the X-T50 about a year-and-a-half ago. They included one on the X-M5. The upcoming X-T30 III will apparently have one, too. The Fujifilm X-E5 also has one, although implemented slightly differently. It’s safe to say that the Film Dial is sticking around for awhile, and for good reason: it places one of Fujifilm’s most important and beloved features in a highly visible and easily accessible position on the camera. The initial implementation of it is good, but certainly not perfect. There’s room for improvement, and I believe Fujifilm is working towards that. As they make it better, don’t be surprised to find it on more and more models in the future.
Going forward, I believe there will be two variations of the Film Dial: knob and wheel. The knob version is found on the X-T50, X-M5, and the upcoming X-T30 III; the wheel version is currently only on the X-E5, but it could be included on the eventual X-Pro3 successor, as well as the someday X100VII. They’re similar, but not identical—the knob version has eight Film Simulations (plus three custom slots, as well as “C” which is Off), while the wheel version has only six Film Sims. The wheel Film Dial has the ability to save Recipes into FS1/FS2/FS3, and hopefully that functionality comes to the knob version at some point.
Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Great Smoky Mountains NP, TN – Velvia Film (Film Dial Recipe)
Whether we’re talking about the knob or wheel Film Dial, very simply it could be made much better. Perhaps this is something Fujifilm will consider for X-Trans VI, which will likely debut next year. The Film Dial should have the ability to save Film Simulation Recipes for each Film Simulation, and not just FS1/FS2/FS3. Undoubtedly, it can be done. It could even be done retroactively for the X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, and X-T30 III via a firmware update, probably somewhat easily.
For the most ideal setup, though, I would take it a step further. Each Film Simulation should have the ability to store up to three Recipes. You could program three different Velvia Recipes into the Velvia slot, for example. To select which one of the three you want would be via a switch, maybe around the knob (for the knob version) or on the back of the camera (for the wheel version). It would have Recipe 1, 2, 3, Off as the options. Recipe Off would simply mean that the Film Dial would function as it does now, where it changes the Film Simulation and nothing else. Whatever JPEG parameters are programmed into the IQ Menu set is what it would default to, aside from (of course) the Film Simulation. Recipe 1, 2, 3 would be which of the three Recipes you want to use. If a Recipe hasn’t been programmed into that slot, the camera would prompt you to add one. These Recipes should have the ability of a custom name, so you can remember which is which.
FS1/FS2/FS3 would no longer need to take up three positions on the Film Dial; instead, you’d have FS-C, and the Recipe 1, 2, 3 switch would determine which FS1/FS2/FS3 you have selected (Recipe Off with FS-C selected would default to whichever Film Simulation you have set it to be within the camera’s menu). Also, the C position would no longer be necessary, opening up three Film Dial positions for Film Simulations that were previously left out. For the knob version, that might be PRO Neg (selecting either Hi or Std from within the menu), Eterna Bleach Bypass, and Monochrome; for the wheel version, it would likely be PRO Neg (again, selecting either Hi or Std from within the menu), Classic Negative, and Nostalgic Neg..
Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Great Smoky Mountains NP, TN – Kodak Pro 400
Since this setup would allow users to program up to 30 Recipes on the wheel Film Dial, and up to 36 Recipes on the knob Film Dial, Custom Settings presets (C1-C7 on most cameras, C1-C6 on some, and C1-C4 on others) would no longer be necessary for Recipes. In other words, Fujifilm should not include the IQ Menu options within Custom Settings presets. You’d still have C1-C7, for example, but it would be focus settings and sound settings and things like that, and not Recipe settings. This would solve an issue that a lot of people have vocalized about how Custom Presets currently work, while also greatly increasing the number of Recipes that can be programmed into the camera at any one time. It’s a big win-win.
There are a few other things that Fujifilm should do. First, when it comes to Acros and Monochrome, there needs to be a way to switch between the +Ye, +R, and +G filter options quickly and easily when using the Film Dial. Maybe a customizable Fn button? Second, the camera should come factory-default with Recipes programmed into the Recipe 1 position for all of the Film Simulations (except, perhaps, for FS1). It could be Recipes that Fujifilm themselves have created, or they could tap into the community for this (I’d be happy to help). Lastly, there should be a way to transfer Recipes directly from your phone to the camera (again, I’d be happy to help).
That’s how I believe the Film Dial should most ideally be implemented. It would greatly increase the number of potential Recipes available in-camera, and it would solve a menu problem that many have complained about. Not everyone will love it (particularly the anti-Film Sim, RAW-only, JPEG-never types), but I’m confident that most people will appreciate it, and it would certainly be a major selling point for whichever cameras have the Film Dial.
Fujifilm’s Film Dial is probably the third most controversial design decision from the brand. First is the entirety of the X half camera, which has a vertically orientated sensor and frame advance lever. Second is the backwards-mounted rear LCD on the X-Pro3. Unlike the other controversies, the Film Dial is not just found on one model, but three (soon to be four) with certainly more to come in the future. With these contentious features, it’s understandable that people have mixed reactions.
Some people love the Film Dial. Some people could take-it-or-leave-it and its inclusion or exclusion is unimportant. Some people don’t mind it, but would prefer a different dial instead. And some people just loathe it.
Fujifilm had sent me an X-T50 to try out prior to its announcement. I didn’t know what the Film Dial was—it looked cool, but how do you use it? Initially, I didn’t really like it. I shoot with Film Simulation Recipes, and most Recipes work well with one specific Film Simulation and not nearly as well with others. Since the Film Dial (except on the X-E5… we’ll get to that later) only changes the Film Simulation and nothing else, it seemed like a useless feature to my photography. But then I had an epiphany: what if there was a “universal” Recipeor two, which was specifically designed for use with any and all Film Simulations? The Film Dial would become an important tool for maximizing in-camera picture aesthetics. So I went from disliking it to loving it rather quickly.
I think some of the criticisms are valid. Is a Film Dial more useful than a Drive Dial or ISO Dial? Fujifilm has never replaced an ISO Dial with a Film Dial, and I hope they never do. Complaining that a Film Dial was implemented instead of an ISO Dial is a little silly since the camera lines in question never had an ISO Dial in the first place. Still, of the two potential knobs, many people would prefer ISO over Film Simulation, and perhaps that is something Fujifilm should take into consideration. Fujifilm has replaced the Drive Dial with the Film Dial, and, for those who commonly use the Drive Dial, I can see how that might be annoying. Instead of a knob on top, Drive is now a button like on the X-E, X100, and X-Pro series. Most ideal might be to use a dual knob like the ISO/Drive dial on the X-T series (except Film Simulations instead of ISO), but Fujifilm hasn’t tried that yet—who knows, they might at some point. I don’t think this is a big deal for most people, but it is understandable. There was a similar sentiment when the four-way D-Pad was removed on most models, and it turned out that the majority acclimated without much heartache. My guess is that the lack of a Drive Knob on certain models will prove to be rather trivial in the long run.
The majority of complaints are from the loathers. They really hate the Film Dial and don’t even want to see it when they look at their camera. It bothers them deeply. Some even claim that they’ll leave the brand over its inclusion. It’s like kryptonite or something. I find this very, very strange. It’s weird. The main issue seems to be that the Film Dial is something they’d never, ever use. They dislike Film Simulations so much that they don’t want anyone to even think that they might (gasp!) use one. Of course the irony is that, outside of some drastic measures, they’re using one: Provia. That’s how their camera sees the world, and where their RAW edits begin. Yes, they can manipulate the files any which way and make any number of unique adjustments, but you have to admit that using Provia has at least a small influence over the final edited photo. Almost all of the Film Simulation haters are using a Film Simulation if they shoot a Fujifilm camera, but they’re either ignorant to that fact or they’re fully aware and are just being dishonest.
For (nearly) the last 15 years, many people have been buying and using Fujifilm cameras without digging into the menus, and as such never ventured beyond the Provia/STD Film Simulation. I’ve had a number of people tell me this. They’ve owned many Fujifilm cameras over the years, and never bothered to change the various IQ Menu items like Film Simulation, Dynamic Range, Color, etc., etc., until recently. When people say that they don’t use Film Simulations, what they often mean is that they’ve never tried anything other than Provia. They don’t know what they’re missing, and perhaps they don’t realize that it can be beneficial to their photography.
For example, a strictly RAW photographer might dismiss Film Simulations (and only use Provia), but not realize that a different Film Simulation might help them to better pre-visualize the shot. Perhaps a different Film Simulation is a closer aesthetic match to their style, and seeing the scene in those colors might help them, and maybe even improve their photography. I know of several photographers—some fairly well known—that use Recipes for this purpose. They’re not JPEG photographers—they RAW edit, and a couple even sell Lightroom presets—but the Recipes help them to visualize the finished photo while in the field, which helps them produce better pictures. Those who dismiss Film Simulations forfeit this great tool.
There’s no right or wrong way to do photography. There’s no right or wrong way to use Film Simulations or Recipes (I’m surprised sometimes how people use Recipes, occasionally in very unexpected ways). Do what works best for you, whatever that is. If you only ever want to use Provia and factory-default IQ settings, that’s cool. I just don’t understand the disdain that some have for the other Film Sims, and (more importantly) for those who appreciate them. There shouldn’t be such hate. There are some buttons that I never use on some of my cameras, and I don’t look at those buttons with disgust or think less than of people who do use them—it would be ridiculous of me to do so. How silly and strange would that be! Yet there are people who do just that when it comes to the Film Dial, and are very open about it, plastering it across the internet.
A long-time Fujifilm photographer told me recently that he never bothered with the various Film Simulations because he shoots RAW and didn’t see the point in trying them. Then he purchased a Fujifilm X-T50. Seeing the Film Dial on the top of the camera made him curious, so he began to try the different Film Sims, and he realized that he likes some more than Provia, especially Classic Negative. Eventually this led him to find Film Simulation Recipes, and he begun shooting JPEGs for the first time. He told me that none of this would have happened if the camera had a Drive Dial instead of a Film Dial. That’s why Fujifilm is putting one of their greatest assets—their amazing in-camera profiles—right on top of their cameras for all to see, and super convenient to use. It was such a great move by the brand.
The Film Dial isn’t perfect, though. First, the X-T50 and X-M5 (along with the upcoming X-T30 III) should have the ability to save Recipes into FS1, FS2, and FS3, just like the Fujifilm X-E5. I really hope Fujifilm does that. Second, why can’t all of the Film Simulations on the Film Dial have the ability to save Recipes? I should be able to program a Provia Recipe, a Velvia Recipe, an Astia Recipe, a Classic Chrome Recipe, etc., etc., into the various slots on the dial. That would be strongly welcomed by a large portion of Fujifilm’s customers. Third, Classic Negative was inexplicably left off the X-E5 Film Dial; I know that not every Film Simulation can make the cut, but Classic Negative should have been included. There’s room for improvement, and I think Fujifilm is working towards making it better.
Personally, I like the Film Dial and appreciate seeing it on more and more cameras. It can be quite useful, especially when paired with a “universal” Recipe. And it will only improve with time. Those who complain about the Film Dial, there’s validity to some of the criticisms and Fujifilm should ponder those; however, some criticisms are just plain silly. Those who say that it’s dumb or garbage or makes them feel sick or want to change brands—I just don’t get it. Nobody said that you have to use the Film Dial (simply keep it set to C), or even that you have to buy a camera with a Film Dial. Nobody is forcing you to do it. And the world doesn’t revolve around you, anyway. People use cameras in all sorts of ways, and all of those ways are valid. Fujifilm has no obligation to make a camera for your preferences and your preferences alone. To think otherwise is strange and narcissistic. The Film Dial is not kryptonite, and you’re not Superman. It can be a useful tool if you take a moment to figure out how to best utilize it for your photographic circumstances—even if you’re a strictly RAW shooter who dislikes Film Simulations, it can be used to your advantage. For the JPEG photographer, it adds significant straight-out-of-camera aesthetic versatility. In other words, the Film Dial is awesome! I think it’s quite smart for Fujifilm to prominently place it on particular cameras, like the X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5.
Backlit Lupine – Sun City, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Thommy’s Ektachrome
I get feedback sometimes that many of the Fuji X Weekly Film Simulation Recipes produce too strong of a warm, yellowish cast. Often this feedback is specific to artificial light photography. The majority of Recipes, like film, are intended for sunny daylight conditions, and when you use them in a different light scenario the results can be a mixed bag. My best suggestion is to—again, like film—use the most appropriate Recipe for the specific situation. Other feedback I get is that some Recipes are too warm even in the most ideal daylight situations. Of course, this is a personal taste situation—what one person might love, another might hate. We each have our own preferences and styles. With over 400 Recipes on this website and the Fuji X Weekly App, there’s bound to be at least one that fits your photography well.
This article is for those who are in search of cooler Recipes—ones that are less warm, and with a blueish cast and not yellow. Of course, it should be noted that Recipes which utilize Auto White Balance are much less prone to being too warm. That might be your best option, and if you are a Fuji X Weekly App Patron, you can find those really easily using the Filter by White Balance feature in the App. For this article, I wasn’t specifically considering AWB, and only one in this list uses it. These Recipes are specifically intended to produce (to varying degrees) a cool, blueish cast in sunny daylight conditions—some much more so than others. If you are trying to avoid yellowish results, the 15 Film Simulation Recipes below are ones to consider. This is not an exhaustive list, and there are many others worth trying that are not mentioned here.
Illuminated Houses – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Jeff Davenport Night
The Jeff Davenport Night Recipe, as the name implies, is for nighttime photography. When used during daylight, you get a strong blue cast. For sunny situations, I find that it works best during overly warm golden hour light, and especially when you want to convey that it’s literally cold outside. It should come as no surprise that it works especially well in artificial light conditions. This Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-T3, X-T30, and GFX100.
Lake Grass – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – CineStill 800T
Like the film of the same name, this Recipe is intended for nighttime and artificial light scenarios. It’s not nearly as blue during sunny daylight as Jeff Davenport Night, but it still has a strong cool cast. This Recipe is for the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF; there’s also a version for the X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, and GFX100S, a version for X-Trans III cameras plus the X-T3 and X-T30, and a version for X-Trans II.
Toyota – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodacolor VR 200
This Recipe, which was made by Thomas Schwab, resembles a version of Kodacolor film from the early 1980’s, especially prints that have begun to color-fade. This one still has a touch of warmth, but is cooler than a lot of daylight-balanced Recipes. Kodacolor VR 200 is for the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF; for the X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, and GFX100S, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Strong.
Old Man at the Vista – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Thommy’s Ektachrome
Another Recipe created by Thomas Schwab, this one is similar to Kodak Ektachrome images printed in classic magazines like National Geographic and Arizona Highways. It’s intended for daylight photography, and still has a touch of warmth, but has a cooler rendering than a lot of other Recipes. This is compatible with the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
This Recipe also mimics Kodak Ektachrome film, but more specifically the new version of the emulsion. It was made with a little assistance from Dan Allen, and is currently an App Patron Early-Access Recipe (only available to FXW App subscribers, currently). Like the two previous Recipes, this one is also intended for sunny daylight situations, and it, too, has a touch of warmth, but less so than a lot of the other options. This Recipe is for the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Elephant Seal Along Rocky Shore – San Simeon, CA – Fujifilm X-E4 – Chrome Slide
This is yet another Recipe that’s intended for sunny daylight situations, but will often produce a cool cast, with a bit of an Ektachrome-like quality to it. This Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, and GFX100S; for the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak.
Bougainvillea Blue – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 – Kodachrome Blue
The Kodachrome Blue Recipe mimics improperly scanned Kodachrome slides. Due to its unique design, Kodachrome is the most difficult slide film to accurately scan, and therefor there are a lot of examples of the film with a blue cast, including some of my own that the lab did a poor job scanning. This Recipe is daylight-balanced, but often produces a somewhat cool cast. The Kodachrome Blue Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, and GFX100S; for the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak.
Yellow Beanie – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI – Fujicolor Blue
This Recipe is also intended for sunny daylight, but has a slight blue cast caused simply from removing some red that’s naturally in the Classic Negative film simulation. Fujicolor Blue is currently an App Patron Early-Access Recipe (only available to FXW App subscribers, currently). It’s compatible with the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
A Sub Above the Dumpster – Pasadena, CA – Fujifilm X-E4 – Nostalgic Print
This Recipe mimics the aesthetic of prints from one-hour labs on Crystal Archive paper (at least one specific print). Like a lot of the Recipes in this list, it’s intended for sunny daylight photography, and can have a touch of warmth, but overall the photos have a slight cool cast. This Recipe is for the Fujifilm X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, GFX100S, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Winter Reeds – Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Classic Slide
Kind of roughly a Kodak Elite Chrome aesthetic, this is yet another daylight-balanced Recipe with a slightly cool cast. Classic Slide is compatible with the Fujifilm X-Pro2, X100F, X-T2, X-T20, X-E3, X-H1, X-T3, X-T30, and GFX100.
Clearing Clouds Over Winter Ridge– Farmington, UT – Fujifilm X-Pro3 – Standard Provia
A slightly cooler, more contrasty, and more vibrant rendering than the Provia film simulation with everything set to factory defaults. This Recipe is for the Fujifilm X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, GFX100S, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Mushos for 5$ – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 – Fujichrome Provia 100F
This Recipe mimics a popular Fujichrome slide film, and as such has a cooler cast than many that replicate Kodak emulsions. It’s compatible with the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, and GFX100S; for the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak.
Park City Downtown – Park City, UT – Fujifilm X-E4 – AgfaChrome RS 100
More of a European color aesthetic, this Recipe is daylight-balanced, but isn’t nearly as warm as a lot of the other options. This is for the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, and GFX100S; for the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak.
Please Don’t – Salt Lake City, UT – Fujifilm X-Pro3 – Agfa Ultra 100
This Recipe is not too dissimilar from the one above. It’s for the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, and GFX100S; for the X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF, set Color Chrome FX Blue to Weak.
Refine – North Salt Lake, UT – Fujifilm X-T30 – Urban Vintage Chrome
This Recipe was also created by Thomas Schwab, and it has kind of a bleach bypass aesthetic. It has a tinge of warmth, but overall is not nearly as yellow as a lot of other Recipes, and the colors quite muted. This one is like a more contrasty version of the Nostalgic Print Recipe. It’s compatible with the Fujifilm X-Pro2, X100F, X-T2, X-T20, X-E3, X-H1, X-T3, X-T30, and GFX100.
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and hundreds more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Buckeye Motor Hotel– Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Summer Sun
So far in 2025, I have published 29 Film Simulation Recipes; however, 14 of those were a part of the Universal Negative Recipe set, which if you only counted that as one Recipe (and not 14), that means I’ve published 16. For the purpose of this article I’m counting all 14, so 29 total. Of those, I wanted to share which 10 are my personal favorites and why you might want to try them yourself. The list below are not in any particular order. Let’s dive in!
Mission San Xavier del Bac – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Kodak Vericolor VPS
I published the Kodak Vericolor VPS Recipe on July 7th. It uses the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, and has a retro negative film aesthetic. It’s surprisingly versatile—I’ve had good results in sunny daylight, overcast, indoor, and even at night. This Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
99 – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Pro 400
This is the second most recent Recipe, published earlier this month on September 5th. It’s an alternative Kodak Portra 400 aesthetic, using the Reala Ace film simulation. Like the first Recipe, this one is surprisingly versatile—I’ve had good results in sunny daylight, overcast, indoor, and even at night. This Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Harkins at Night – Goodyear, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 – Kodak Portra do Sol
The Kodak Portra do Sol Recipe, which was created by Gilson Teixeira, was published back on April 23rd. It’s a modification of my Bright Kodak Recipe, and uses Classic Chrome film simulation. This is excellent in sunny daylight conditions, and works pretty well in blue hour, as well. It’s intended for the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, and GFX100S.
Summer Joy – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Summer Sun
I published this Summer Sun Recipe, which uses the Reala Ace film simulation, on June 26th. It’s along the lines of Bright Summer, Eterna Summer, Summer of ’59, 1970’s Summer, California Summer, Texas Sun, Kodak Portra 800 v3, and others. Summer Sun works best in sunny daylight conditions, and is compatible with the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Golden CVS – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-S20 – Provia Summer – Photo by Jonathan Roesch
The Provia Summer Recipe is a Fuji X Weekly App Patron Early-Access Recipe, published way back on January 22nd. Unsurprisingly, it uses the Provia film simulation. Like Summer Sun, it is also along the lines of those same “Summer” Recipes, and it works best in sunny daylight situation (I did have some good luck at night with this). Provia Summer is compatible with the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100S, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Mountain Grass & Flowers – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Velvia Slide
This is another Fuji X Weekly App Patron Early-Access Recipe, published on May 19th. It has a Fujichrome aesthetic similar to Velvia 100, and works best in sunny daylight, but can be good in some other light situations sometimes. This Recipe, which uses the Velvia film simulation, is compatible with the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100S, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Cactus in Early Spring – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Retro Negative
This is a Universal Negative Recipe, which was published back on March 28th. It uses the Reala Ace film simulation, and is roughly reminiscent of photo prints from the 1990’s. It’s surprisingly versatile—I’ve had good results in sunny daylight, overcast, indoor, and even at night. This Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Don’t be Shamed – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm X100VI – Fujicolor Superia 200
Another Universal Negative Recipe that was published back on March 28th, the Fujicolor Superia 200 Recipe, which uses the Classic Negative film simulation, is reminiscent of the film of the same name. Like Retro Negative, this is surprisingly versatile—I’ve had good results in sunny daylight, overcast, indoor, and even at night. This Recipe is intended for the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
The Classic B&W Recipe was invented on a photowalk in Colorado. It uses the Acros+G film simulation, and was published on August 2nd. It’s already one of my personal favorite B&W Recipes. It’s compatible with the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100S, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
This is the latest Recipe, published just a few days ago on September 20th. It uses the Acros film simulation, and was invented by Dylan Van Matre with some help from Anders Linborg. It’s going to be a fan favorite, I already know it. I don’t think it will overtake the Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe as the most popular B&W Recipe, but it might become the second most popular—we’ll see. This Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, X-E5, GFX100S, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF.
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and hundreds more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Coastal Photographer – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Plus-X 125
This new Kodak Plus-X 125 Film Simulation Recipes comes to us curtesy of Dylan Van Matre. “The short story is that I’ve been a film shooter for a long time,” Dylan told me, “and one of my favorite films during that time has been Kodak Plus-X 125. When I moved to Fuji and discovered Film Simulation Recipes, one of the films I looked for was Kodak Plus-X 125. It was a favorite of mine during the early 90’s. I couldn’t find one published by someone else, so I endeavored to make my own. I enlisted the help of Anders Linborg to learn about Recipes and how to create them.”
“When I decided to try and create this Recipe,” Dylan continued, “I thought that I should try and learn from someone who has created ones that I enjoyed and felt were accurate. Anders with his Kodak Tri-X 400 Recipe (and others) immediately came to mind. I emailed him inquiring about his creation process. Anders was kind enough to respond, and he gave me a great check list on how to go about creating a Recipes. I download the specification sheet for Plus-X 125 film and found the spectrum analysis chart. I found the most prominent peak on the chart and made a note on the frequency that it’s located. That’s how I decide upon my white balance.”
Irrigation Pipe – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Plus-X 125
“From there I picked the response curve that I felt was most appropriate,” Dylan said, “which led me to the Acros film simulation. After that I used the reference images I had, which were a bunch of Plus-X scans from the early 90’s, and I starting shooting with my Fujifilm camera. I’ve shot in all kinds of lighting conditions over the last couple years, making tweaks here and there. After some fine-tuning, I had created a Recipe that I feel most represents Plus-X 125 film. I want to thank Andors Linborg for his amazing advise, and I want to thank Ritchie for his amazing website.”
Included in the email was a private link to some of Dylan’s photos captured with this Kodak Plus-X 125 Film Simulation Recipe, as well as some of his scans of actual Kodak Plus-X 125 film. It was quite obvious to me comparing the two that this Recipe is a good match, and Dylan did an excellent job creating it. He certainly put in a lot of research and effort to get this right. Thank you, Dylan Van Matre, for creating and sharing this Recipe!
Cactus & Barbed Wire Fence – Rock Springs, AZ – Fujifilm X-E4 – Kodak Plus-X 125
Plus-X was a long-running classic B&W negative film by Kodak, known for its fine grain, sharpness, and moderate contrast that made it popular for both professional and amateur photographers. Originally introduced in 1938 as a motion picture film, it evolved over the decades. The ISO 125 version was released in 1954. After more than 70 years in production, Kodak discontinued Plus-X in 2010, with the last batch shipping in 2011, marking the end of an era for one of the company’s longest-running emulsions. This Recipe is compatible with X-Trans IV (except the X-T3/X-T30) and X-Trans V cameras, as well as newer GFX models.
Film Simulation: Acros (including +Ye, +R, or +G) Monochromatic Color (Toning): WC 0 & MG 0 (Off) Dynamic Range: DR200 Grain Effect: Weak, Large Color Chrome Effect: Strong Color Chrome FX Blue: Off White Balance: Daylight, +9 Red & +9 Blue Highlight: -1 Shadow: +1 Sharpness: -1 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: +2 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: -1/3 to -2/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Kodak Plus-X 125 Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-T5, X100VI, X-E4 & GFX100S II:
Distant Dust Storm – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5
Estrella Mountains from White Tank Foothills – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5
Spewing Water – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Truck Junk Yard – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm GFX100S II
Table 18 – Avondale, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Sunlit Banister – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5
Saguaro & Dark Storm – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifim X-E4
Closed for Storm Damage – Navarro, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
Post in the Water – Bodega Bay, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Coastal Cove – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Desert Saguaro – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Wild at Heart – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5 – Photo by Amanda Roesch
Angled Doorway – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
St. Anthony’s Feast – Boston, MA – Fujifilm X-T50 – Superia Negative
A common question that I get asked is which Film Simulation Recipes are best for street photography. It’s a popular genre that a lot of people enjoy. I wouldn’t call myself a street photographer per se, but I’ve definitely done it. I dabble in it from time-to-time, but it’s not my primary photographic interest; however, I do believe I have enough experience to give some good suggestions.
With over 400 Fujifilm Recipes on this website and in the Fuji X Weekly App, there are tons of choices. Situationally specific, each one of those 400+ Recipes could be good options for street photography. I want to narrow it down a bit for you, though, by suggesting ten to consider trying. Probably all ten won’t be good options for your style, but perhaps one or maybe a few will be. I’m also skipping over some of the most obvious: Kodachrome 64, Reggie’s Portra, Kodak Portra 400, Kodak Portra 400 v2, and Kodak Gold 200. My assumption is that you have already tried those, or are already aware that those are good options for street photography. Actually, I didn’t choose any Recipes that use Classic Chrome, even though that particular film simulation is by far the most popular by those who use Recipes. This article highlights some Recipes that you might not otherwise consider.
The ten Recipes below are not a comprehensive list, and just because I didn’t include one doesn’t mean it’s not good for street photography. In fact, some that I didn’t list might be better than the ones that I did. Each person has different tastes and styles, so what I suggest might not be the best options for you personally. Feel free to comment below which Film Simulation Recipe—whether in this list or not—is your favorite for street photography. I do think, if you are unsure which to try, at least one of the ten Recipes below will be a good choice for you, and worth trying the next time you are out with your camera in an urban environment.
Yellow Pants, Blue Cart – Los Angeles, CA – Fujifilm X100VI – Appalachian Negative
The Appalachian Negative Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with fifth-generation X-Trans cameras and the newer GFX models. Built on top of the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, it’s produces a warm, amber-washed aesthetic with a distinct retro quality. It has an ability to transform the ordinary into something emotive. It’s good for retaining shadow detail, holding back blown highlights, and infusing everyday moments with a sense of timelessness. This Recipe works best in sunny daylight situations.
The 1976 Kodak Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, and the newer GFX models. It was inspired by the work of Joel Meyerowitz, particularly his mid-1970s street, coastal, small town, and landscape photography. This Recipe uses the Nostalgic Neg. film simulation, and combines richly warm colors with strong contrast, producing a vintage analog aesthetic. It’s great for street photography because it brings warmth and depth to mundane moments. Since this Recipe uses Auto White Balance, it works well across a variety of lighting conditions.
Working – Salt Lake City, UT – Fujifilm X-E4 – Kodak Vision3 250D
The Kodak Vision3 250D Film Simulation Recipe is made for X-Trans IV cameras (except the X-T3 and X-T30, which has its own version; there’s also a v2 version for fifth-generation models). It aims to evoke the look of the Kodak Vision3 250D motion picture film as used for still photography. The Eterna film simulation, which has a soft cinematic tonality, is the base; however, this Recipe adds significant contrast, producing a more dramatic aesthetic that still feels film-like. It works best in sunny daylight situations, but can sometimes be good in various light scenarios.
Doggles – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T50 – Nostalgic Americana
The Nostalgic Americana Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with fifth-generation X-Trans cameras and newer GFX models. It draws its inspiration from vintage issues of Arizona Highways magazine from the ’60’s and ’70’s during the American New Color era. This Recipe uses Nostalgic Neg. as its base, and produces a warm yet slightly muted color rendering combined with softened tonality. The result is a distinctly retro rendering that feels sun-warmed and aged. It works especially well for sunny daylight scenes, but can also be good in overcast conditions.
The Eterna Summer Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with “newer” X-Trans IV and all X-Trans V models, plus newer GFX cameras. Specifically, this Recipe, which uses the Eterna film sim., is intended to fit well in a photo series that also contains Classic Chrome-based Recipes. It produces a cinematic aesthetic with warm summertime vibes, and works best in sunny daylight situations.
Dumbo Crowd – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X-T50 – Reala Ace
The Reala Ace Film Simulation Recipe is intended for fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, and can also be used on newer GFX models. It mimics Fujicolor Reala Ace film, but uses Auto White Balance for maximum versatility. Despite the name, it uses Classic Negative and not the new Reala Ace film simulation. It has a 4th-layer Fujicolor negative film aesthetic, and offers a lot of versatility for various light conditions.
Pouring Rain – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T50 – Pacific Blues
The Pacific Blues Film Simulation Recipe is for fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, plus newer GFX models; there’s also a version for X-Trans IV cameras. It uses the Classic Negative film simulation, and was inspired by Lucy Laucht’s Spirit of Summer series, and especially the Positano Blues images. It’s specifically intended for a sunny day at the beach, but it can work well in many other scenarios, including dreary overcast and fog. It’s great for street photography because it can turn everyday scenes into something dramatic without being over-the-top.
Art Mart – Boulder, CO – Fujifilm X100VI – Superia Negative
The Superia Negative Film Simulation Recipe is for fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, plus newer GFX models. It uses the Classic Negative film simulation, and has a similar aesthetic to Fujicolor Superia film. It belongs to the Film Dial Recipe set, which means that the underlying settings work well with all of the different film simulations. This Recipe uses the Auto White Priority White Balance, and is especially versatile.
Friendly Conversation – Philadelphia, PA – Fujifilm X-T5 – Fujifilm Negative – by Amanda Roesch
The Fujifilm Negative Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with Fujifilm’s fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, plus newer GFX models. It uses the new Reala Ace film sim., and draws inspiration from Fujicolor PRO 160NS film. It feels restrained and natural, but with a distinct analog aesthetic. Because it does so well with skin tone rendering, this Recipe might be the best of these ten options for street portraits. It’s best for sunny daylight situations, but can also do well in a variety of light situations.
Sailer on Sumter – Fort Sumter, SC – Fujifilm GFX100S II – Kodak Tri-X 400
The Kodak Tri-X 400 Film Simulation Recipe has compatibility with X-Trans III, IV, and V cameras, plus all GFX models. It uses the Acros film simulation, and is the most popular B&W Recipe on Fuji X Weekly. For some reason, B&W Recipes are not nearly as popular as color. If you have not tried this one, whether for street photography or other situations, now is the time. It’s my personal favorite monochromatic Recipe, and one of my favorites out of all the Recipes.
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
This last Saturday I had a quick adventure to Los Angeles, and it was my first time using my brand-new Fujifilm X-E5. In fact, the picture below, Sky Harbor Tower, was frame 0001. I had plenty of experience with the X-E5 already because Fujifilm had loaned me one shortly after it was announced, but I had to give it back after a couple of weeks. While I’ve had my X-E5 for a week, I didn’t have an opportunity to use it until this trip.
I charged the battery the day before, and set the camera up, programming 11 Recipes into it. The ones I chose for C1-C7 are Kodak Portra 400 v2, Kodak Pro 400, Kodachrome 64, Kodak Tri-X 400, Superia Negative (Film Dial Recipe), Reala Ace, and 1970’s Summer. I set Xpro ’62 as the “Nothing Selected” Recipe in the IQ Menu. On the Film Dial, I programmed Pacific Blues into FS1, Kodak Vericolor VPS into FS2, and 1960 Chrome into FS3. I don’t know if I’ll keep those 11 for awhile or switch some of them out—I’m still deciding—but those are the ones I had available in the camera on this trip. I didn’t use all of them this time around, only five.
The purpose of this trip was to lead a Fujifilm X half photowalk with Samy’s Camera and Fujifilm. If you follow me on Instagram, you’ve already seen the X half pictures. I flew in that morning from Phoenix and flew out of LA that night. It was a quick adventure. I had a lot of fun, and it was great to meet some of you in person and photograph with you.
A lot of times when I travel I take way too much gear with me. I go back-and-forth, actually. I’ll take a ton of gear and feel overwhelmed and burdened by it, so I’ll slim it back to a real minimal kit, but it will slowly get larger and larger and larger over time as I think I might need this or that, then the cycle repeats. I’m at the minimal kit spot right now. The only gear I brought along was the X half and the X-E5 with the 23mm f/2.8 pancake lens, plus one spare battery. Everything else stayed home. This seemed to work out quite well, but I’m sure pretty soon I’ll pack more gear into the bag before heading off on an outing somewhere, and it will once again begin to get bulkier and heavier. I have to remind myself: oftentimes, less is more.
Can – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – 1970’s Summer
Marshaller – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – 1970’s Summer
Find these Film Simulation Recipes and many more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Fujifilm has 20 Film Simulations on their latest cameras, and one of my favorites is Nostalgic Negative (also called Nostalgic Neg.). I thought it would be worthwhile to discuss this Film Simulation and compare a few different Recipes. Let’s jump right into this.
Nostalgic Negative is one of Fujifilm’s most recent Film Sims, first appearing in 2021 on the GFX100S, and now found on all of the fifth-generation X-series cameras. Inspired by American New Color photographs of the 1970’s from William Eggleston, Stephen Shore, and Joel Sternfeld (among others), it aims to replicate the look of prints from that era. The result is an aesthetic that feels like a warm memory pulled from your grandparent’s photo album or a shoebox full of old pictures.
Rainbow over Jersey – Jersey City, NJ – Fujifilm X-T50 – 1976 Kodak Recipe
In practice, Nostalgic Neg. sits somewhere between Classic Chrome and Eterna. It carries some of the subtle tonal gentleness of Eterna while achieving a Kodak-esque palette kind of similar to Classic Chrome, but with a unique shadow rendering and warmth. This Film Simulation doesn’t aim for true-to-life results; it’s more like a memory, giving your photos an instant sense of history and emotion.
So far, I’ve published 22 Film Simulation Recipes that use Nostalgic Negative as the base. You can achieve various looks with this Film Sim., and you may not know which one is right for you. I thought it would be a good idea to compare a handful of them directly, which might help you to decide which one(s) to program into your Fujifilm camera. The images below are all camera-made JPEGs from my Fujifilm GFX100S II, reprocessed in-camera using various Recipes, plus one with factory-default settings (no Recipe). I’m considering publishing a whole bunch of similar articles, so let me know if you appreciate this type of comparison.
There’s a strange article up on PetaPixel entitled Stop Making Digital Look Like Film by Bimal Nepal, that I want to offer a rebuttal to. I understand that there’s only so much that happens within the photo world on any given day, and on the slow days you might put out a controversial piece (a.k.a. click bait) to get views and such, especially when ad revenue is a major part of the business strategy. I don’t necessarily have a problem with that—after all, I have written some controversial articles, and I also have advertisements on my website—but I do think PetaPixel should be careful not to overplay it, or they risk losing credibility. I can’t imagine that the editors actually agree with this piece (I hope not), but they’re certainly promoting it. An article that explores why people like the film look when using digital cameras would have been significantly more interesting. Published just one day later, Film Photography in 2025 Is Bluer and Less Saturated is actually quite fascinating, and (ironically and surprisingly) somewhat related to the article in question. My guess—based only on the number of comments—is that the click bait article got a lot more attention, and I suspect that will encourage more similar content in the future, unfortunately.
The main problem with Bimal’s piece is that it demands you change your photography. You aren’t doing it right. The title is second-person declarative: “(You) stop making digital look like film.” It’s a command, and you are being told what to do. The body of the post continues the sentiment. It would not be controversial had the author simply stated, “This is why I don’t make my digital pictures look like film.” That’s great. We all have our reasons for doing what we do, and maybe we can even learn from each other. But the article is more like: my way is right, your way is wrong. It’s just like the whole “You must shoot RAW” thing, which is tired, outdated, inaccurate, and needs to stop. It would have been equally as wrong if the author had demanded that everyone apply (say) VCSO filters to their pictures.
There’s no right or wrong way to do photography. There are thousands of paths, and you might take multiple trails at various times. If something works for you, that’s awesome! That’s what matters—finding what works for you personally. If someone tells you that you are doing photography wrong, and especially if they tell you that you must do it their way, I strongly advise you to take that advice for what it’s worth, which is not much of anything, certainly not two pennies (or a click to PetaPixel). You do photography however you want to do photography, whatever that looks like.
I might be reading too much into this, but the author seems to dislike Fujifilm, and especially the Fujifilm Recipe community (that’s you and I), which is known for analog aesthetics on digital images. He never states Fujifilm specifically, but what caught my attention was the mention of Film Simulations. In another PetaPixel article, he seems to dislike mirrorless cameras, or—perhaps more accurately—prefers DSLRs to mirrorless. Fujifilm, of course, does not make DSLRs (at least not since the S5 Pro, which was built on a Nikon D200, and is long discontinued), and all of their cameras for the last 20 years feature Film Simulations. Like I said, I could be connecting dots that were never meant to connect, and making much more of this than the author intended, but it seems like Fujifilm photographers in particular are doing digital photography all wrong, if you were to ask Bimal.
So let me get to the rebuttal. Below are five reasons why a photographer might prefer to make their digital photographs look like film—five reasons why you may want to continue making your pictures appear analog.
Modern digital cameras are really good. They produce images that are especially clean and clear, free from defects and artifacts, which was nearly impossible in the film era. It’s great but also sterile, like a hospital room prepped for surgery. This might be preferable, but I find it boring, lacking character. Adding an analog aesthetic to digital pictures can make them less perfect, which can more easily convey certain feelings or moods. This is just my opinion, and it’s perfectly ok to disagree with it. There’s no right or wrong answer here, just personal preferences. Personally, I don’t like my pictures to appear so perfect, so clinical, so digital.
Film is Appealing
Canon AE-1 – Kodachrome 64 35mm film
The reason why I like the aesthetic of film is because it has character. It has texture. Each emulsion has unique qualities. There are emotions that each look conveys to the viewer. It can be serendipitous, with wonderful surprises. Film photography requires much patience and thoughtfulness. One must have a willingness to fail and an acceptance for when that inevitably happens. Those are good qualities, but they’re born out of frustrating circumstances. I love the look of film, but not always the process of analog photography.
A common response to this article is going to be, “If you like the look of film, just shoot film.” Yeah, that’s great and all, and certainly something I have done for many years, but digital is much faster, more reliable, more flexible, and probably less expensive (depending on how many rolls of film you shoot). Digital cameras are so much more convenient than film, and that’s why I like digital photography. If there’s a way to get the best of both worlds—the convenience of digital with the look of film—that’s a major win-win. And, thankfully, you can get the best of both worlds. There’s nothing wrong with digital photography, there’s nothing wrong with film photography, and there’s nothing wrong with mimicking film-like looks with digital cameras.
The pictures produced by Fujifilm cameras feel authentic and film-like because they reflect in-camera processing designed by Fujifilm utilizing their renown film heritage. When you use Film Simulation Recipes, what you see is what you get, and the pictures don’t require manipulation—they’re not “photoshopped” (which, right or wrong, has become a bad word in recent times). Like using a particular film across a series of photos, choosing one Recipe can give your images a cohesive, intentional, and stylized aesthetic. Not having to edit allows for a simple and efficient workflow, which can save you a lot of time while increasing your productivity.
Last but far from least, shooting straight-out-of-camera JPEGs using Film Simulation Recipes is fun. A lot of people do it because they enjoy it. I can’t tell you how many times people have told me that using Recipes has made photography fun for them again. You should be enjoying the process of making pictures, and if you’re not, it might be time to ask yourself why, and consider if you should make any changes to your process. Maybe you don’t find Recipes and camera-made JPEGs enjoyable, and that’s ok. Different strokes for different folks. But a lot of people do find it fun, and it’s become a big part of the Fujifilm appeal. The Fujifilm Recipe community continues to grow and grow, and for good reason.
These five points highlight why a Fujifilm photographer using Film Simulation Recipes might love making their digital images look like film. Recipes combine some of film’s iconic character with digital’s convenience, consistency, and immediacy. There’s a very large community who appreciates the aesthetics of film and use it to purposefully convey certain feelings and moods through their pictures, but they also appreciate the ease of digital. The ability to combine both into a simplified workflow is quite attractive, which is why so many people are making their digital pictures look like film—and, no, unless they want to, they should not stop.
This last Saturday I taught a class at Nuzira called Fujifilm’s Film Simulations & Fuji X Weekly Recipes — Film-like Photos Without Editing. Overall the class went well; however, for those who couldn’t attend in-person, the first 30 minutes of it did not livestream. I’m not sure what went wrong. But, if you want to catch the last hour, it’s on Nuzira’s YouTube channel. My apologies for the technical trouble.
A request that I had from someone in the class was to share the image that’s at the top of this article, which directly compares Fujifilm’s 20 Film Simulations. The other IQ settings in those photos are factory default (without Recipes). It’s a good way to see how the various Film Sims render the scene differently. If you are not sure what the different Film Simulations do and which ones you might like best, you can probably get a good idea by studying that image.
I don’t have a comparison of Film Simulations with and without Recipes, other than a quick side-by-side from a couple of years ago. It might be worthwhile to do something like that again, but perhaps more robust. With over 400 Recipes, it would be impractical to do all of them, or even most. Still, it might be beneficial to tackle such a project, so that’s something I’ll try to work on. I’m sure it will need to take place over a whole series of articles.
Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Captured with a GFX100S II & 80mm f/1.7 – Reala Ace Recipe
While I was at Nuzira, I picked up a Fujifilm X-E5 with the 23mm f/2.8 that I had preordered. I didn’t get my name on the list quick enough to be in the first batch, but (thankfully) the second batch wasn’t far behind. I haven’t set up the camera yet, but I’m hoping I can get to that today. Not unrelated to the previous paragraphs, I plan to write some articles about the X-E5. After all, this is Fujifilm’s very first Recipe camera.
If you are in the Los Angeles area this coming weekend, please join me on a Fujifilm X half photowalk with Samy’s Camera, as part of their 49th Anniversary three-day event. Spaces are limited and won’t likely last long, so be sure to register today! It’s $25 per-person ($27.13 after taxes), but each participant will receive a $25 Samy’s gift card, essentially making it free. Please bring an SD Card so you can take your photos home.
I’ll also be in Minneapolis on September 28th. Details to come, but it’s a don’t-miss kind of event, so if you live in the area, be sure to mark your calendars.
Hillside – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5 – Kodak Pro 400
One film can produce many various looks depending on a whole host of factors. How was it shot: overexposed (and by how much), box speed, or underexposed (and by how much)? What gear was used, especially which lens? Were any filters used? What was the exact light situation? How was the film stored and handled? How was it developed, including how fresh were the chemicals, and what was the temperature and pH of the water? If it was printed, how was that handled and what paper was used? If it was scanned, which scanner was used, what were the settings, and what post-processing was done? How are you viewing the photo: print, light table, computer monitor, cellphone screen? There are a thousand factors that can affect the outcome—some a little, some a lot.
Sometimes I’ll get contradicting feedback on a certain Film Simulation Recipe. One person will say, I’ve shot with that film, and the Recipe matches almost exactly; another will say, I’ve shot with that film, and the Recipe is way off. That shouldn’t be surprising for the reasons pointed out in the last paragraph—both statements are probably quite true. There are other factors, of course, that are worth considering. One is called “memory color” (which is often mentioned by Fujifilm), in which we remember a film looking a certain way, but in reality our memory of it is a little off. I’ve experienced this personally, where I thought a certain group of settings looked exactly like some emulsion, but when I actually compared them side-by-side it was not such a close match after all. Which is preferable: memory color accuracy or technical accuracy? There’s no correct answer to that question, but you may prefer one over the other. Another significant factor is that, although Fujifilm does provide a fair amount of tools to customize aesthetics in-camera, there’s only so much that you can do with the options available to achieve a certain look. You can only get so close, and not a 100% match; however, it is surprising how close a Recipe will get sometimes. Also worth mentioning is that digital sensors and silver film behave quite divergently sometimes.
Fujifilm modeled the Classic Chrome Film Simulation after (non-specific) Kodak slide films from the 1980’s and ’90’s. Classic Chrome has some obvious similarities to both Kodachrome and Ektachrome; however, it’s not an exact facsimile of either (think of it more like a fictitious Kodak slide film). It does have a distinct Kodak-esque color palette, so it is a great Film Simulation to build Kodak Recipes on. The Nostalgic Neg. Film Simulation also has a Kodak-like palette, but it is intended to resemble prints from the 1970’s, and not projected slides or scanned film. Eterna and (to a lesser extent) PRO Neg. Std can be modified into Kodak aesthetics; however, they’re not modeled after any Kodak stocks. Circling back to Classic Chrome, I want to emphasize that it is primarily intended to replicate color reversal (slide) film, and not negative film.
Garden Lake – Avondale, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Pro 400
The newest Film Simulation, called Reala Ace, is modeled after color negative film, and most closely resembled Fujicolor PRO 160C. Despite its name, it’s quite obviously inspired by the ISO 160 Fujicolor PRO line of films; basically, it’s a new-and-improved PRO Neg. Film Simulation—a similar yet better iteration of PRO Neg. Std and PRO Neg. Hi (kind of like when Kodak replaced the NC and VC versions of Portra and introduced a new iteration of the films in 2011, except we still have the two PRO Neg. options…). Reala Ace doesn’t have a distinct Kodak palette, but, like PRO Neg. Std, it can be made into a Kodak-like look. The advantage of using Reala Ace instead of Classic Chrome is that it retains that “print film” quality of the Film Simulation.
This new Kodak Pro 400 Recipe came about after some feedback that Reala Ace might be a better foundation for a Kodak Portra 400 look than Classic Chrome. I had previously considered the possibility, but hadn’t put any effort into creating it. So I researched pictures and fiddled with the camera settings. I made a few different versions, which matched some certain examples but were notably off from others. I had to narrow it down to which specific Kodak Portra 400 look I wanted to replicate, and get as close to that as I could, with some compromises. It was definitely a process, and sometimes quite frustrating, but I settled on these settings. One disadvantage of using Reala Ace, obviously, is that, at its core, it’s a Fujicolor look, and sometimes that still comes through. You could think of it as printing Kodak film on Crystal Archive paper instead of Endura or Ektacolor. That’s not what this Recipe mimics, but it is a way to make peace with the issue. Most of these pictures were reprocessed in-camera using this Recipe, and not directly captured with it; however, I do have a bunch of other pictures (that are perhaps “less inspiring”) that were actually captured with the Recipe, but I only included a couple of them.
In the end, I feel that I got close-but-no-cigar. I think, in certain situations with certain subjects and lighting, this Recipe can be quite convincing at mimicking Kodak Portra 400 film. There are pictures in this article that you could put side-by-side with certain Kodak Portra 400 frames, and it would be difficult to distinguish which was the film and which was the Recipe. But there are other images that are so far off that I could not find a matching Portra 400 look (trust me, I tried). So I would say that this Recipe is hit-or-miss, and that’s why I didn’t name it Kodak Portra 400 v3 (although that’s what it’s named in my cameras right now). It’s definitely Portra 400 related. The full name of the film is Kodak Professional Portra 400, so I’m calling this Recipe Kodak Pro 400. There’s also Pro Image 100, another Kodak negative film, and this Recipe by chance isn’t terribly far off from that, either; however, it’s not intended to resemble that emulsion, and isn’t quite as good of a match. Either way, like the other Portra Recipes, how close it is or isn’t depends on which pictures you are looking at.
Walking the Museum Grounds – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI – Kodak Pro 400
I included a lot of sample pictures in this article, which will hopefully help to determine when this Recipe works well and when maybe it’s less than ideal. Like the film, it thrives in daylight, but this might be a better choice than some others in overcast situations. I also included a comparison of this Kodak Pro 400 Recipe with Reggie’s Portra, Kodak Portra 400, and Kodak Portra 400 v2 at the bottom of this article (for Reggie’s Portra and Kodak Portra 400, I set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off). I find it interesting that there are some common settings between this and the Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipe, and also some opposite settings—that’s unintentional, just the way it worked out. Because this Recipe uses Reala Ace, it’s compatible with fifth-generation models, which (as of this writing) are the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. It’s also compatible with the latest GFX cameras: GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF. Those who have been dissatisfied with the Portra 400 Recipes may find that they like this one better; those who love the Portra 400 Recipes might not be convinced that this is an improvement. Personally, I really like it, and I might keep both this and Kodak Portra 400 v2 in my C1-C7, as there are times when one might be preferable over the other.
Film Simulation: Reala Ace Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Strong, Small Color Chrome Effect: Off Color Chrome FX Blue: Strong White Balance: 5200K, +2 Red & -3 Blue Highlight: -2 Shadow: 0 Color: +1 Sharpness: -2 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: -2 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: +1/3 to +1 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Kodak Pro 400 Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-T5 and X100VI:
Birthday Boy – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T5
(Not) Riding a Trolley – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
We’re on a Roll – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
AMC – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Electric Sunset – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
California Sunset – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Full Moonrise – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Light, Reflected Light – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Canon Camera – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Sunset in the Mirror – Avondale, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Terminally Waiting – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Warm Wood – Elk, CA- Fujifilm X-T5
Stairs – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Underground Station – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Roundhouse Locomotive – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Shop Interior – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
The Tides – Bodega Bay, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Bodega Bay – Bodega Bay, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Greenwood Cove – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Turquoise Pacific – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Fog over Wild Brush – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Fog Rolling In – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Highway 1 – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Coastal Fog – Elk, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Magnolia – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Wet Sidewalk – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Wet Alley – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Red Bull – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Squirrel Box – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
Turn Arrow – Washington, D.C. – Fujifilm X100VI
Corridor – Arlington, VA – Fujifilm X100VI
Gravestones – Arlington, VA – Fujifilm X100VI
Empty Trail – Navarro, CA – Fujifilm X-T5
Southwest Sky – Arlington, VA – Fujifilm X100VI
Pilot Paused – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Bus Stop – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
Box Truck – South San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
Jackpot – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Bike, Parking – New York City, NY – Fujifilm X100VI
Blue Car – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
99 – San Francisco, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
No Parking, unless it’s an RV – Fort Bragg, CA – Fujifilm X100VI
Tall Saguaro – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Comparison
Kodak Pro 400 Recipe
Reggie’s Portra Recipe
Kodak Portra 400 Recipe
Kodak Portra 400 v2
Kodak Pro 400 Recipe
Reggie’s Portra Recipe
Kodak Portra 400 Recipe
Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipe
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Also, for those in Southern California, be sure to join me on September 13th at 2:00 PM for a Fujifilm X half photowalk with Samy’s Camera, as part of their 49th Anniversary three-day event. Spaces are limited and won’t likely last long, so be sure to register today! It’s $25 per-person ($27.13 after taxes), but each participant will receive a $25 Samy’s gift card, essentially making it free. Please bring an SD Card so you can take your photos home.
Red Coast – Fort Bragg, CA – Fujifilm X-T4 ES – This new Aerochrome v2 Recipe
Last year, I started my infrared photography journey when I purchased a Fujifilm X-T4 ES full-spectrum IR camera. Since then, I’ve published seven infrared Film Simulation Recipes for the X-T4 ES, which can also be used on full-spectrum converted X-Trans IV (except the X-T3 & X-T30) and X-Trans V cameras. You must have a full-spectrum model to use these Recipes, which requires an expensive and invasive procedure from a third-party vendor; otherwise, the X-T4 ES (“Extended Spectrum”) is a full-spectrum camera briefly offered by Fujifilm to the general public (it’s very difficult to find, but in my opinion totally worth owning). If you have a “normal” (non-converted) camera, these Recipes will not work.
One camera that people have commonly converted (as common as it gets, anyway) is the Fujifilm X-T3. While the X-T3 is X-Trans IV, it has JPEG options more similar to X-Trans III—it’s missing some that are available on later X-Trans IV models. Because of this, my seven infrared Recipes won’t work on a full-spectrum converted X-T3 or X-T30. Dan Allan has a full-spectrum X-T3, and he really wanted to use my Aerochrome v2 Recipe, so he modified it to be compatible with his camera. It’s not 100% the same, but pretty close, and quite nice. Those with a full-spectrum converted X-T3 or X-T30 can now join the infrared Recipe fun!
Above Left: Original Fujifilm X-T4 ES Aerochrome v2 Recipe; Above Right: This new Aerochrome v2 Recipe for the X-T3/X-T30.
Dan was kind to share his modification with me (and all of you), and also allowed me to publish his wonderful photos in this article, which you’ll find below (thank you, Dan!). If you have an X-Trans III full-spectrum model, this Recipe will work by ignoring Color Chrome Effect, but it will render a little different (feel free to try, though). If you have a Fujifilm X-T4 ES—or an X-Trans IV (other than the X-T3 & X-T30) or X-Trans V camera that has been full-spectrum modified—this Recipe will work by choosing Grain size Small, Color Chrome FX Blue set to Off, and Clarity set to 0. Depending on your preferences, you might actually like this version a bit better. The blue sky is the most obvious difference (interestingly, it seems slightly less divergent in Dan’s pictures than in the set above), but there are other more subtle variances; however, the overall vibe is the same between the original Aerochrome V2 Recipe and the new version. This Recipe requires three filters: Kolari Vision IR Chrome filter, Hoya G(XO) Yellow-Green filter and Tiffen Yellow 2 #8 filter. The IR Chrome filter is intended for infrared photography, while the Yellow-Green and Yellow filters are for B&W film. I’m not sure if the order matters, but I have the Yellow filter first (closest to the lens), the IR Chrome next, and the Yellow-Green last (furthest from the lens).
Edit: Dan informed me that he has the IR Chrome filter first (closest to the lens), followed by the G(XO), and then the Yellow 2 #8 (furthest from the lens). He isn’t sure if the order matters, but it might. He also wanted to mention that his conversion was with Kolari, with their anti-reflection glass, which might have a minimal impact on the outcome vs the X-T4 ES.
Filters: Kolari Vision IR Chrome, Hoya G(XO) Yellow-Green & Tiffen Yellow 2 #8 Film Simulation: Velvia Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Strong Color Chrome Effect: Strong White Balance: 5000K, +7 Red & +7 Blue Highlight: +2 Shadow: 0 Color: +4 Sharpness: 0 High ISO NR: -4 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: 0 to +2/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured by Dan Allen using this Aerochrome v2 Film Simulation Recipe on his full-spectrum converted Fujifilm X-T3:
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
Full-Spectrum Fujifilm X-T3 & Aerochrome v2 Recipe — Photo by Dan Allen
I’m really excited, because I just published my first YouTube video in over a year! You might not be aware that Fuji X Weekly has a YouTube channel, but it does. I published two videos (not including Shorts) in 2024 (here and here), and three in 2023 (here, here and here). Those were a lot of fun, but YouTube videos are so much work. They take hours and hours and hours to create from start-to-finish. A good estimation—for those channels without a team of people—is one or two (or sometimes more) hours of editing for every minute of video published. That’s not including the time it takes to record the clips.
The video that just went live is a roadtrip to the Mission San Xavier del Bac in Tucson. This is the oldest still-used building in Arizona, and the oldest church. It’s where the city started (even though now it’s a little outside of town). The mission is a popular location for photography, and even Ansel Adams photographed it. I used 11 different Film Simulation Recipes on a Fujifilm X-E5. The adventure gets a bit wild, so hang onto your proverbial hats. I’ve included the video below—be sure to watch!
We tried a little different style for this new video. It’s a bit more relaxed, but hopefully entertaining. It gets a bit silly at times. Amanda (my wife) filmed it all using her Fujifilm X-S20 and Fujinon 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 lens and an upcoming Recipe for video (look for more details on that in the near-ish future). She also did almost all of the editing. There were some technical difficulties; hopefully a new mic will help alleviate some of the issues on future projects. This is also the longest video we’ve ever published, nearly three times longer than the previous longest. A big hurray for Amanda and all the work she put into it!
Even though I have published videos very infrequently over the last few years, the channel has (surprisingly) grown and grown. There are over 17,000 subscribers currently. Four of the last five videos have over 10,000 views, and two have over 16,000. That’s not bad for a barely-there channel. My hope with this new upload is to kick-off a restart of sorts. While I can’t promise anything, my goal is to publish new videos regularly, and not let so much time pass between them. But, in the meantime, I hope that you enjoy this one.
Old Church – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Classic B&W
I love black-and-white photography. Kodak Tri-X 400 is my favorite monochromatic option, and (unsurprisingly) it’s by far the most popular B&W Recipe. For whatever reason, color Film Simulation Recipes tend to be a lot more popular than monochrome, so there are quite a few more of them; however, I really enjoy publishing a good B&W Recipe, and I’m quite excited about this one in particular. It’s really good, in my humble opinion.
The story behind this Classic B&W Recipe is unusual. While leading a photowalk in Manitou Springs, Colorado, with Mike’s Camera, someone asked me to explain the process of creating a Recipe. So I walked him through the process right there in Manitou Springs on a Fujifilm X-E5, and created this JPEG settings combo while doing so. I remember thinking that it looked nice, but pretty much forgot about it until after I returned home and reviewed the photos. After using it a little more, it quickly became one of my favorite B&W Recipes. Kodak Tri-X 400 still ranks a little higher in my book, but this one is easily a Top 5 for me.
Coffee – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 – Classic B&W
While I only used this Classic B&W Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5 and X100VI, it is fully compatible with X-Trans IV (except the X-T3 and X-T30) and X-Trans V cameras. For those keeping score, that’s (as of this writing) the X-Pro3, X100V, X-T4, X-S10, X-E4, X-T30 II, X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. You can also use this on the latest GFX cameras, including the GFX100S, GFX100 II, GFX100S II, and GFX100RF. For the Fujifilm X-T3, X-T30, and X-Trans III models, consider trying the Analog Monochrome Recipe, which isn’t too dissimilar.
Film Simulation: Acros+G Monochromatic Color (Toning): WC 0 & MG 0 (Off) Dynamic Range: DR200 Grain Effect: Strong, Large Color Chrome Effect: Off Color Chrome FX Blue: Off White Balance: Incandescent, -9 Red & +9 Blue Highlight: +3 Shadow: +4 Sharpness: +1 High ISO NR: -4 Clarity: +3 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 12800 Exposure Compensation: 0 to +2/3 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Classic B&W Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X-E5 and X100VI:
Monochrome Umbrella – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Empty Chair in a Dark Room – Litchfield Park, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Lonely Chair – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Hanging Shadows – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Grey Odadiuc – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Shadow Abstract – Litchfield Park, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Suburban Palm Shadow – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Coffee Cups – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
In the Raw – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Facing North – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Horse on a Ledge – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Baldwin 2 – Manitou Springs, CO – Fujifilm X-E5
Mission Church – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and over 400 more on the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Fujifilm recently loaned me an X-E5 to try out for a week or so. I also got to play with one at the B&H BILD Expo last month, so I was already a bit familiar with the camera before it arrived in the mail. Included with the X-E5 was the brand-new Fujinon 23mm f/2.8 pancake lens, so I’ll also be discussing that in this review, too. Let’s dive right in!
The Fujifilm X-E5 is actually the sixth X-E camera. The X-E1, released in 2012, was the very first, and the third X-series model overall, with only the X100 and X-Pro1 predating it. The X-E2 came out only one year later, followed by the nearly identical X-E2s in 2016. A year after that, Fujifilm released the X-E3, which saw the first significant design change (although it was still pretty similar). The X-E4 came out in 2021, which was the most different, with an emphasis on minimalism, compactness, and affordability; however, it was still similar overall. We have another significant design change with the X-E5, yet it still retains the distinctive look of an X-E series model.
With the X-E5, Fujifilm quite noticeably improved the construction quality—for example, the top plate is a single piece of machined aluminum, and the camera seems less plasticky overall. It just feels more sturdy, more premium, more refined than the X-E4. With a pancake lens attached—like the new 23mm f/2.8—the camera closely resembles an X100VI, which was clearly intentional. The X-E5 is essentially an interchangeable-lens X100VI; for those who have asked for such a camera: here it is! The two models aren’t exactly the same, and they each have their advantages and disadvantages, but they’re certainly similar enough to justify the comparison.
I don’t want to dive too deeply into the specs, but some important notes are that the X-E5 has the same 40-megapixel X-Trans V sensor and processor as the X100VI, X-T50, and X-T5. Like those models, the X-E5 also has IBIS. This is a camera capable of capturing high quality photos and videos. Not surprising, the X-E5 is also much more expensive—plus a tad larger and heavier—than its predecessor.
Like the X-T50 and X-M5, the X-E5 has a Film Dial, although it’s implemented a bit differently. Instead of a knob, it’s a wheel on the back, with a little window on the top plate. This is a really cool design; however, there is a downside: it has fewer Film Simulations. The X-T50 and X-M5 have only eight of the 20 Film Sims on the knob, with three customizable slots for your favorites that were left out; the X-E5 has only six Film Simulations, with three customizable slots. The six Film Sims on the dial are Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Reala Ace, and Acros. Somehow—shockingly and inexplicably—Classic Negative was left out, as was Nostalgic Negative. I know that not all of them could make the cut, but I definitely question why Classic Negative was not included—seems like a sin.
The three customizable slots—called FS1, FS2, and FS3—can be set to any Film Simulation. In addition to that, they can also be customized into Film Simulation Recipes (functionality that should be—and hopefully will be—brought to the X-T50 and X-M5 via a firmware update). This is the very first time that Fujifilm has used the term “Recipe” in a camera—amazing! You can have 11 different Recipes programmed into the X-E5: seven within the C1-C7 Custom Settings presets, one in the IQ Menu set, and three on the Film Dial. The Film Dial also works well with my Universal Negative and Film Dial Recipes, providing extra aesthetic versatility. Only the C1-C7 Recipes can be custom named, so you have to remember what the other four are.
While this is certainly a welcome evolution of this feature, it could be made even better. For example, all of the Film Simulations should have the option for Recipes, and not just FS1/FS2/FS3. One issue with this UI, though, is that Recipes are scattered: some in Custom Settings presets, some on the Film Dial, and one in the IQ Menu. I think, more ideally, you’d find them all in one place. A lot of Fujifilm users would appreciate a Custom Settings Dial instead of a Film Dial, with maybe C1-C9 or C1-C12 (more is better). There are a lot of different ways that this could be addressed, and it’s something that should be addressed for future models. Still, the opportunity to have three extra Recipes programmed into the camera at any one time is quite nice, and I’m thankful for it. This is the main reason why I preordered this camera, even though I own an X-E4 that I really like.
Included with the X-E5 was the new Fujinon XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR pancake. This lens is very similar to the Fujinon 27mm f/2.8 R WR, which happens to be one of my absolute favorite lenses. I’ve been saying for years that Fujifilm should have more pancake lenses in their lineup, since a major selling point of Fujifilm cameras are their compact size and minimal weight. A camera like the X-E5 paired with a handful of tiny pancakes is ideal for traveling. This particular camera and lens combo is especially great for everyday walk-around photography.
The lens is sharp with minimal flaws. It has great close-focus capabilities; it’s not a macro-lens by any means, but with 40mp to crop from, it’s possible to use it for near-macro photography. From a technical point-of-view (and mind you, I didn’t do any serious testing), it’s pretty darn good for what it is, a marvel of engineering; from an artistic point-of-view, it seems to lack a little of the magic (a.k.a. character) that the 27mm f/2.8 and 23mm f/2 lenses are known for. Like the 27mm, it isn’t the quietest Fujinon lens. If you are trying to decide between the 23mm f/2.8 and the 27mm f/2.8, that’s going to be a tough call—personally, I like the 27mm just a bit more; however, the close-focus capabilities of the 23mm is certainly a significant plus. If you are trying to decide between the 23mm f/2.8 and 23mm f/2, that’s also going to be difficult, and your decision might come down to just how small is small enough for you. If you are buying the Fujifilm X-E5, it seems like an easy choice to get it bundled with the 23mm f/2.8, since it’s only $200 more when the lens itself is $500—if you have no intentions of keeping it, just turn around and sell it for $450, which makes the camera more affordable.
Ants & Funyun – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Kodachrome 64
Getting back to the X-E5, the camera has a couple of really cool features, but you can only use one of them, and not both. The first, which is borrowed from the GFX100RF, is called Surround View Mode. It allows you to see outside of the frame when using an aspect ratio other than 3:2, giving a faux optical viewfinder experience (sort of). This is particularly nice when using the 1:1 aspect ratio. The XPan ratio would have been a great addition, but (sadly) it’s still missing on X-series models. The second feature is called Classic Display Mode, which turns the EVF into a really cool retro 1980’s-inspired display. I like both, but I couldn’t figure out how to activate the Classic Display Mode for some time—eventually I asked a Fujifilm tech rep for help. As it turns out, if Surround View Mode is activated, even when using the 3:2 aspect ratio, Classic Display Mode is disabled (and vice versa). Fujifilm: I suggest that Surround View Mode be automatically disabled when in the 3:2 aspect ratio, so that Classic Display Mode can be used; when changing aspect ratios to anything other than 3:2, if Surround View is activated, it would automatically disable Classic Display. This way, you don’t have to jump through hoops to use both of these cool new features.
While the X-E4 saw a lot of buttons removed in the name of minimalism, Fujifilm gave them to the X-E5 in spades. Just the new front control lever alone allows for five customizable functions. The inclusion of the rear command wheel and M/C/S switch means that you shouldn’t be short of camera controls, no matter how many functions you need quick access to. Those who disliked the direction of the X-E4 should especially appreciate its successor.
What else can I tell you about the Fujifilm X-E5? It isn’t weather-sealed (although it seems to have some level of weather resistance—I wouldn’t put it under a faucet, though). It uses the “old” NP-W126S battery. I expected that, as those things would have increased the size, weight, and cost even more. The X-E5 is definitely more premium than previous X-E cameras. I had suggested that Fujifilm prioritize size, weight, and cost by keeping it nearly the same as the X-E4; however, my opinion was clearly in the minority. Most people asked for an interchangeable-lens X100VI, and the X-E5 is as close to that as you’re likely ever going to get. It’s a very nice camera.
It comes with a “nice” price tag, too. In America, it’s $1,700 for the body-only, and $1,900 when bundled with the new 23mm pancake lens. That’s pretty shocking, especially when it’s double the price of the X-E4; however, keep in mind that inflation and tariffs have impacted the price in addition to the more expensive components that Fujifilm used in the camera. Interestingly enough, the X-E1 was $999 in 2012, which is about $1,400 in today’s dollars; add to that tariffs, and you’ve pretty much got the X-E5 price tag, never mind the 40mp sensor, IBIS, and better build quality. While it seems expensive, it is not an entry-level model. And with Fujifilm raising the price (in America) of the X100VI to $1,800, the X-T50 to $1,600, the X-T5 to $1,900, the MSRP of the X-E5 makes a little more sense. I do think it’s worthwhile to buy at $1,700, which is why I have it preordered bundled with the 23mm f/2.8 lens.
Mission San Xavier del Bac – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5 & 23mm f/2.8 – Kodak Vericolor VPS
This post contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.
Right now, people are talking about Fujifilm Recipes. Thanks to models like the new Fujifilm X-E5, which is the first camera to use the term “Recipe” inside the menu, more and more people are discovering the joys of Film Simulation Recipes. Interestingly enough, not only are camera-made JPEGs no longer stigmatized, they’re actually “in” right now—they’re cool.
Yesterday, DPReview posted an article by Mitchell Clark entitled Why the Fujifilm X-E5 turned me into a film recipes fan. The article specifically mentions two Fuji X Weekly Recipes: Ilford HP5 Plus 400 that Anders Lindborg created and 1976 Kodak that I created. Interestingly, it’s written from the perspective of someone who’s always dismissed camera-made JPEGs and Recipes. But, after trying some while preparing for an upcoming Fujifilm X-E5 review, not only did the author have a change of heart, but it also affected how he thought about the scene he was photographing (in a positive way). This article makes it ok for those who have never tried Recipes to do so, and explains that you might not realize what you’re missing out on.
“Photos look great right out of the camera,” Ben wrote. “Strange as it may sound to seasoned photo nerds, I went into my trip with the GFX100RF with the intention of shooting JPEGs—essentially using this $5,000 camera the way my parents documented family vacations with their film point-and-shoots. And guess what? It worked spectacularly well.” He went on to specifically mention my Kodachrome 64 and Kodak Portra 400 v2 Recipes.
Above, clockwise from top-left: Kodachrome 64, Kodak Portra 400 v2, 1976 Kodak, and Ilford HP5 Plus 400 Recipes
Of course, it’s not just large photography sites or major newspapers that are talking about Fujifilm Recipes. I’ve had the privilege of visiting many camera stores recently, from the small but up-and-coming Nuzira that’s local to me in Arizona, to B&H in Manhattan, and a whole bunch of others in-between. I was even interviewed recently by Mike’s Camera. No matter the store, the story is the same: people are interested in Recipes, and they’re being talked about by both customers and employees. As one sales representative told me at a major store, “Half of my sales of Fujifilm cameras are a direct result of your App.”
I didn’t make Film Simulation Recipes to sell cameras, but nonetheless it has become a major selling point, and now even an official feature. I made Recipes to help people—including myself—more quickly and easily achieve desired picture aesthetics, in a way that’s often more fun and authentic. It’s simply a way to help others, and be a positive part of the photography continuum. As I wrote last week: Shoot more, edit less, and let your camera become your darkroom.
Savannah Central 7069 – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI – Retro Color
When Fujifilm released the X half last month, it included some brand-new filters, including Light Leak, Expired Film, Halation, and many more. One of my personal favorites is called Retro. Fujifilm doesn’t say exactly what the Retro Filter is supposed to resemble, but it’s an obvious vintage aesthetic. It reminds me a bit of Ormond Gigli’s color work of the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, although I’m sure the similarities are coincidental. I do think the filter was inspired by 1960’s era Ektachrome, especially when push-processed, something Kodak began offering in 1968.
The one and only X-series camera that has the Retro Filter is the X half. You won’t find it on the X100VI or X-E5 or any other model; however, it is on Instax Evo cameras. This filter, plus a number of others on the X half, were inherited from the Instax department. In my opinion, Fujifilm should add the Retro and Expired Film Filters to the Advanced Filters section of X-series cameras. Light Leak and Halation should be added as JPEG options that can be applied to Film Simulation Recipes. I hope they do.
Above: Retro Filter on the Fujifilm X half
While the Retro Filter on the X half was the initial inspiration for this new Recipe, I leaned more heavily into a different (yet similar) picture aesthetic that I really like: the Retro Style Smart Filter on my Samsung ST76 digicam. This little pocket point-and-shoot is from 2012, and it’s not particularly great, but I really like the Retro Style Smart Filter on it, which is pretty much the only reason why I use that old digicam. The filter is intended to produce a vintage ’60’s and ’70’s look, although (again) the specifics aren’t identified. While it has some similarities to the Retro Filter on the X half, it is notably divergent—a bit softer, less bold, and more subtle (yet still pronounced). To me, it looks more like prints from that era, more so than push-processed slides.
I did consider both of these picture aesthetics when created this Retro Color Film Simulation Recipe, but I spent more time comparing my X100VI and X-E5 photos to the Samsung ST76 than the X half. That was the vibe that I wanted to emulate, more so than the X half images. I think this Recipe nails the look in certain situations, and is pretty close (but not perfectly matched) in others. I’m pretty satisfied with the end result.
Above: Retro Style Smart Filter on a Samsung ST76
You might ask why I replicated the Retro look from a cheap digicam over the Retro look from the X half. Initially, I was attempting to replicate the X half aesthetic, but I encountered some difficulties early in that process. If I kept at it, perhaps those things could have been overcome. My hope is that Fujifilm brings the Retro Filter to X-series cameras, which might make the Recipe obsolete if I made it. Aside from that, while the Retro aesthetic from the Samsung ST76 and Fujifilm X half both have their positive and unique characteristics, overall I prefer Samsung’s version, as Fujifilm’s can be a little too strong sometimes for my tastes. I like both, and they’re both somewhat similar, but the one that I like best is what I ended up mimicking.
This Recipe produces an aesthetic reminiscent of some photo prints from the 1960’s and ’70’s, maybe captured using Ektachrome X or Ektachrome 200. I did find a few examples of Ektachrome prints from the 1970’s (for example, this one), which aren’t terribly dissimilar, and maybe sit halfway in-between the Retro Color Film Simulation Recipe and the X half‘s Retro Filter. As with anything in film photography, there are a lot of variables that can significantly affect the outcome. I would say that it is the “general aesthetic” that the Recipe recreates more so than a specific film or process.
Triton – Tonopah, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI – Retro Color
This Retro Color Recipe looks great on sunny days, and can be especially nice during golden hour. Try both a slight underexposure and overexposure—the results are notably different, and you might prefer one over the other. It produces a certain look with overcast sky, which you could either love or hate (most people probably won’t like it). I would avoid this for nighttime situations, but early blue hour is fine. This Recipe wouldn’t be my first choice for portrait photography, although situationally specific, it might be ok for that. If you appreciate a warm, vintage aesthetic, give the Retro Color Recipe a try, as you might really like it.
This is a Patron Early-Access Recipe. If you are a Fuji X Weekly App Patron, you have access to it right now. If not, no worries, as it will eventually be made available to everyone, once it is replaced by a new Early-Access Recipe. It is compatible with all fifth-generation X-Trans cameras, which (as of this writing) are the Fujifilm X-H2s, X-H2, X-T5, X-S20, X100VI, X-T50, X-M5, and X-E5. It can also be used on the latest GFX models, including the GFX100 II, GFX100S II and GFX100RF.
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs using this Retro Color Film Simulation Recipe on a Fujifilm X100VI and X-E5:
7 Eleven – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Dusty Steering Wheel – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Sparkless Plug – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Eye Closed – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Inspection – Arlington National Cemetery, VA – Fujifilm X100VI
The Porter Machine – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
2715 – Savannah, GA – Fujifilm X100VI
Mission Arch – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Storm over Mission San Xavier – Tucson, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Treasury Department – Washington, DC – Fujifilm X100VI
Big Flag – Phoenix, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Bashas on Main Street – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Vacancy at the Motor Hotel – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Afternoon Palm – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Craftsman – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Bougainvillea Sunset – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Tire Pile – Waddell, AZ – Fujifilm X-E5
Fireplace – Scottsdale, AZ – Fujifilm X100VI
Fading Sunset – Somewhere over Arizona (I think) – Fujifilm X100VI
Find this Film Simulation Recipe and 400 more in the Fuji X Weekly App! Consider becoming a Patron subscriber to unlock the best App experience and to support Fuji X Weekly.
Small Clouds Above the Roof – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 – Pro Neg Recipe
I worked on this Film Simulation Recipe for some time. It wen’t through a lot of iterations, with small tweaks here and there over a few month period, before I landed on the final settings. The idea was to create a generic Kodak-ish color negative film aesthetic, perhaps something similar to ColorPlus 200 or Pro Image 100. While I did look at both of those emulsions a number of times during the development of this Recipe, I didn’t set out to strictly emulate either of them. I think there can be similarities at times to both of those film stocks, but generally speaking this Recipe isn’t a replication of either—or any—film. I hope that makes sense. I do think it does a good job at producing a generic color negative film aesthetic that is by-and-large Kodak-esque, with occasional similarities to both ColorPlus 200 and Pro Image 100.
Pro Neg was a Fuji X Weekly App Patron Early-Access Recipe. The Fuji X Weekly App is free, yet becoming a Fuji X Weekly Patron unlocks the best App experience! One benefit of being a Patron is you get early access to some new Film Simulation Recipes. These Early-Access Recipes will eventually become available free to everyone in time. This one was just replaced by another, so now it’s available to everyone. Patrons help support Fuji X Weekly and, really, without them there would be no App. So I want to give a special “thank you” to all of the Patrons!
Beautiful Bougainvillea Blooms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30 – Pro Neg Recipe
This Pro Neg Film Simulation Recipe is compatible with the Fujifilm X-T3 & X-T30, plus all X-Trans III cameras, which are the X-Pro2, X100F, X-E3, X-T2, X-T20, and X-H1. For newer cameras, you’ll have to decide on a Grain size (Small or Large), set Color Chrome FX Blue to Off, and Clarity to 0. This Recipe is also compatible with the GFX100; it can be used on “older” GFX models (50R and 50S), but will render slightly differently (try it anyway).
Film Simulation: PRO Neg. Hi Dynamic Range: DR400 Grain Effect: Weak Color Chrome Effect: Off/NA White Balance: 9100K, -7 Red & +7 Blue Highlight: +1 Shadow: +1 Color: +1 Sharpness: -1 High ISO NR: -4 ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure Compensation: +1/3 to +1 (typically)
Example photographs, all camera-made JPEGs captured using this Pro Neg Film Simulation Recipe on my Fujifilm X-T30:
Empty Schoolyard – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Backyard Wall View – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Hidden Triangle – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Gila River Hat – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Tree by Field 4 – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Bougainvillea Petals – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Little Cloud Between the Trees – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Twin Palms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Palm Behind Bougainvillea Blossoms – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Suburban Colors – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Bougainvillea in the Sky – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Basketball Hoop at Dusk – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Hoop & Tree – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Court Cycle – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Dusk Saguaro – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
One Fallen, One Standing – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Window Reflection – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Yellow Trumpet – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
Backyard Rose Blossom – Buckeye, AZ – Fujifilm X-T30
